qarlap Archive

Upvotes	Title	Category	Author	Subreddit	Date (UTC)

Upvotes	Comment on	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
3	Can we return the sub to leftist male advocacy? You're not left of center if you have no anticapitalist stance, fyi. You're a liberal.	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	09/02/25 02:11 AM
1	Traditional masculinity shouldn’t be something men strive for Sorry, I'm not informed on that. I would assume a bias for neoteny; women appear to have a stronger selective pressure to be more neotenous. This ("gynocentrism") is talking about sociocultural not biological bias. Certainly the latter could motivate the former.	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	26/01/25 09:14 PM
7	Traditional masculinity shouldn’t be something men strive for There's been a lot written on the latter if you look up gynocentrism. This isn't inherent but a recent historical sociocultural phemonenon.	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	26/01/25 05:35 PM
2	[Male health]: Why do almost all mammals have foreskins? Yes? I'm not sure how that's germane to the current topic of conversation.	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	21/12/24 03:50 PM
3	[Male health]: Why do almost all mammals have foreskins? Yes? That acknowledgment was true historically. The modern scientific rhetoric is one based in erogenous denial.	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	21/12/24 04:41 AM
12	[Male health]: Why do almost all mammals have foreskins? I see your point with the animal comparison. Various vertebrate penile sheaths are homologous (like phalanges of bird wing v. phalanges of mammalian hands). However humans are unique in several ways (such as language faculties) and this is just such an example. While animal sheaths are prepuces, and the human foreskin is a prepuce, animal sheaths are not foreskin. The difference is anatomical and biomechanical. In animals, the prepuce has its attachment site at the base of the penile shaft. The …	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	19/12/24 08:27 PM
1	Society needs to understand that men can easily be physically abused in straight relationships Rights and laws are two different conceptual objects entirely. However, ethics is just another framework like the law. Both are just as invented and socially sanctioned as the other. You cannot assert your rights if they are not recognized. Laws constrain people from infringing upon others' rights. Laypersons must resort to communally agreed upon authority to exercise rights under the law. If someone ignores the rule of law, it is only its observance by the rest that protects another. In this sy…	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	12/12/24 09:41 AM
1	Society needs to understand that men can easily be physically abused in straight relationships You don't get to choose your participation in law outside of a courtroom. You are constrained by them under threat of punishment. Break them means ignoring them. That's not participating; following the law is "observing". You're not otherwise using them in any real sense unless you are a lawyer or policymaker.	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	12/12/24 06:50 AM
1	Society needs to understand that men can easily be physically abused in straight relationships You don't use laws at all; you're bound by them. If you "use" laws, you are practicing law: i.e., a lawyer.	/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates	12/12/24 06:23 AM
10	Baby boys are almost 18 times more likely to die from circumcision than an adult man is from penile cancer That statement could be misread to imply that men with phimosis have an increased risk of penile cancer. Such a statement would be misleading. There's no causal relation between the two. Smegma is benign and has also been shown not to cause any cancers. Almost all cases of penile cancer are likely viral, caused by HPV strains and other viruses, all of which are sexually transmitted. Circumcised men are also subject to penile cancer. In fact, circumcision is associated with higher rates for STD o…	/r/MensRights	20/09/24 11:07 PM