TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

qianxiaonai Archive

View 0 posts and 53 comments by qianxiaonai on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

Men are better at 'mental rotation' in IQ test. Women are better at 'reading and verbal' in IQ test. We're dumber and more intelligent at different capabilities. Women can listen to different letters spoken into different ears at same time. They're more agreeable. They're care oriented. Obviously more emotional. Plenty of differences.
/r/MensRights04/03/22 03:51 PM
4

We could grant an extension to the mother's right to abort children. The kid is already grown up? No problem. Her body, her choice. This is not about rationality.
/r/MensRights04/03/22 03:05 PM
5

Women prefer fiction. Men prefer non-fiction. There are reasons why some things are dominated by one sex or the other.
/r/MensRights04/03/22 03:03 PM
0

It's been said that respect is a house built on a foundation of fear. Imagine if I behaved so badly my provider and protector could no longer commit himself to me. I'd fear the loss of commitment and respect his sacrifices! Oh wait, so I can disrespect him, take his house, his kids, half his stuff, legally tax him, and abduct his kids? OK
/r/MensRights03/03/22 09:34 PM
0

We can't acquire knowledge about the world without generalising. That's what science does, effectively generalises, e.g. dropped objects fall. Indeed, if we can't judge and discern categories based on our perceptions then we won't know what to eat and drink. Only a radical fool would make a general statement "that's not true for ALL women" and follow it up with a nonsequitor that invalidates the first bit "stop generalising". This must be why Shakespeare wrote "life is a tale told by an idiot, f…
/r/MensRights03/03/22 09:32 PM
7

We've got to shed tears in privacy. Women are viscerally disgusted by a weak man.
/r/MensRights02/03/22 02:19 PM
2

Read the equality act. It means they've committed a criminal offence and are guilty until they can prove themselves innocent. One could send an open letter explaining this. Also one could make non-crime police reports about this gender discrimination. The female supremacy makes no sense. Especially if you go one up and identify as female. Let the snakeof post modernity eat its own tail.
/r/MensRights02/03/22 11:17 AM
6

Psychology is a female dominated profession. In Leathal Weapon, Riggs negged the psychologist witch, and their polarity energised the film. But now, we're in late stage feminism and the witch is so powerful that no one can cross her, without being cancelled. We ought to make feminists into the baddies in action films. Let's pull the band aid off and be explicit about the evil aspect of female supremacy. Bosd bitches making themselves into the man they desire and self-parnering is clearly a socia…
/r/MensRights28/02/22 11:26 AM
-2

Daughters' test for their father's love by acting outrageously. If the father protects her by maintaining control and reasonable rules under his roof then the test is passed. It's built in to women to shit test. However, if the father drinks the poison of feminism, and says daughter is equal so can behave in a risky way then her fails her test and daughter feels unloved. We should widely teach female psychology.
/r/MensRights28/02/22 10:20 AM
7

Problem with hysterical women is they get brain freeze and double down being wrong. It's to do with oxytocin telling them now you're out of the group. And they don't want responsibility for making decisions so try to do it covertly and impose secrecy after the fact. We've got to openly share this. Just imagine if people knew that the constitution doesn't apply in family courts, and the profiteers gouge children's childhood itself to liquidate our social institutions for profit today.
/r/MensRights28/02/22 10:09 AM
2

Family court destroys the family and imposes a court order of secrecy irrationally for illogical reasons. That's toxic feminity at its worst.
/r/MensRights28/02/22 10:04 AM
7

If this was publicised there'd be a revolution. Basically women are shit testing. It's like when a girl demands to watch a movie but refuses all particular movies. Ditch that bitch by withdrawing attention, affection, and commitment. She'll cry tactical tears, play victim, then after her period finishes she'll realise she was unreasonable. Men and women can't come together under impossible girl rules. High maintenance now means child support. They've gone too far. It's unconstitutional and offen…
/r/MensRights28/02/22 10:03 AM
1

Victory is a bit hollow though. I think the women are shit testing. They want a judge to call them out as in the story of Judgement of Soloman. You may as well ignore her once she's proven willing to act unreasonably - especially since any move means you lose worse. Family court always produces outcomes worse than the initial state for them family. It's part of Marx goal to "aufheben die familie", i.e. abolish the family. That's why they attack motherhood and fatherhood.
/r/MensRights28/02/22 09:51 AM
3

He might be paying for another man's children too. Cuckoldry runs at 10% according to Ian Cumming chief executive of Health Education England.
/r/MensRights27/02/22 10:11 PM
3

Yeah. We're actually just great apes. When shit goes down like famine, house fire, asteroid strike, pandemic, solar storm, volcanic eruption etc. We revert to archetypal programming that has always worked so far. And we adapt our cultures. War is like that too. Sadly, a war of aggression triggers to total war mode in all of us.
/r/MensRights27/02/22 08:59 PM
8

Women play not to lose. Men play to win. As both strategies promote reproductively successful outcome.
/r/MensRights27/02/22 07:25 AM
1

Feminism is a supremacy movement.
/r/MensRights26/02/22 02:56 PM
6

The feminist who wrote the article claimed the other woman 'had a pretty clear animus against her step mum'. I hope animus possession makes it to mainstream awareness. It explains hysterical women and the Cinderella effect.
/r/MensRights26/02/22 02:43 PM
2

We'd need a strategic reserve of tactical panty liners if the conflict extended beyond 28 days.
/r/MensRights25/02/22 09:26 PM
1

War is inimicable to civilization. We ought to have rule of law. But it breaks down during wartime. And besides laws can be wrong, and applied by corrupt institutions. Imagine it from each person's point of view, feel the pain, and understand the unfortunate reasons why.
/r/MensRights25/02/22 03:27 PM
9

Women are the majority. Although that might change if we conscript them and send them to battlefields. Plus, they don't like hierarchies or military discipline. They'd rather come to consensus by talking things through as a group. Battlefield mud might be good for the skin, but how can you do your hair and make up when supply lines are stretched to breaking point. Do we even have a NATO standard issue battle bra?
/r/MensRights25/02/22 03:11 PM
4

Judges will be able to order retroactive abortion on male perpetrators by tying to artillery. Typical sentences will include taxes on unrelated men to pay for the female victims cash flow draining asset purchases.
/r/MensRights25/02/22 01:02 PM
11

Special courts? With special prisons? They can swear on the Communist Manifesto, replace statues of justice with Lyssa, and use temperature sensors to ensure women only enter if they're about to menstruate. Women also prefer fiction to non-fiction. So accordingly, evidence will be presented in the form of a glossy gossip magazine. There'll be free period products and a grand library of victimology literature for the legal cannon.
/r/MensRights25/02/22 12:59 PM
8

If we dropped feminists behind enemy lines, they'd activate war brides mode and compete to submit to the resident hypergamous best options.
/r/MensRights25/02/22 10:20 AM
-3

We should just issue women with side arms and a licence to kill. Because they're the real victims.
/r/MensRights25/02/22 10:02 AM
2

I think words are powerful. Always document what happens, and keep records. It's costly for corrupt institutions to knowingly impose bad judgements. Even when they call it contempt of court to call out unconstitutional, illegal, unfair, unjust or wrong judgements. Eventually, the snake of post modernity ends up eating its own tail.
/r/MensRights24/02/22 05:05 PM
1

They're feminist false flag organisations. They're trained to profile you as a perpetrator. That is a suspect with no rights.
/r/MensRights24/02/22 04:59 PM
1

As men, we ought to focus on genetic engineering to set heights to 6'2". Or the meta verse. Or use feminist collective thinking to restore equity by taxing fat women to pay short men a stipend equal to the value of the hot to the men's sexual market value.
/r/MensRights24/02/22 04:37 PM
1

Feminism is a projection of the female psyche. The patriarchy is to feminism as international Jewry was to Hitler; a made up global conspiracy. Used to agitate ever increasing and outragous injustices. Splitting good and bad so bad is all them. Good is all us. A supremacy movement for women who constitute the majority of developed country populations.
/r/MensRights24/02/22 04:25 PM
1

As men, I think we're on our own. However, we are rational problem solvers who systematise. Hence we have books and YouTube. And the gym. And an honour code with crews of other men. This is potentially more powerful than the female mode of having no secrets and talking ones guts out with lots of women. Start with stoicism and no more mr nice guy, practical female psychology, male action plan etc.
/r/MensRights24/02/22 01:59 PM
1

Boys are born at a rate of 106 to 100 girls. Eggs are the biggest cell in the human body. You're born with 1-2 million eggs and they mature once a month at most from age 12-50 (up to 450 mature eggs). Sperm are small and you get 100 million a day. Most of our ancestors are women. Women usually reproduced but men often didn't. Those women shared an alpha man as a hareem member. Those millions of extra men were sex starved slaves, soldiers, and degenerates. And pornhub wasn't even available for mo…
/r/MensRights24/02/22 01:53 PM
1

I think we'll always have the poor. But we haven't always had the productivity benefits of 2022 technology. We might end up with universal basic income. Or biotechnology could boost most people's IQ. Safety improvements will continue too. But we'll always have a normal distribution of danger in jobs and women who play it safe will prefer safe jobs. Women play not to lose. Men play to win.
/r/MensRights24/02/22 01:47 PM
1

The next generation should know about the female dual mating strategy (alpha flux, beta bucks) and Hypergamy (women date up, 58% higher income man is my 'equal' or I'm not happy and love him but not in love with him). They can watch videos on tiktok without censorship hopefully.
/r/MensRights24/02/22 01:41 PM
1

Rob Henderson (an orphan washed through state care system, an air force veteran, and Yale and Cambridge academic who's been on Jordan Peterson's podcast) published a study on twitter showing height and income needed to offset for women's preferences on twitter. If you're 5 foot then you need 317k extra annual income to match a 6 foot man in sexual market value.
/r/MensRights24/02/22 01:38 PM
-2

It's certainly nuanced. I don't think there should be so much abortion though. It's hit African Americans hard through past 50 years leading to an effective genocide. Also, it should require sign off from both parents, and maybe grandparents. 70 million abortions per year is approximate death toll of all of world war 2. Why are we nuking all these wombs. We're liquidating our inheritance from our hard working ancestors to produce a generation of hedonist who are failing to pay forward debt to ne…
/r/MensRights24/02/22 01:32 PM
1

Also, while we're at it, isn't sexual orientation a protected characteristic under the equality act. That crazy woman needs to explain herself because she may be committing a series of criminal offences and she's guilty until proven innocent under the Equality Act 2010 that was passed in the UK parliament. You might as well record her (potentially a tort but not an offence) and make a police report.
/r/MensRights24/02/22 01:26 PM
1

Although in the end, security is enforced by men. Even the most radical home detonating feminists rely on a call to uniformed men with weapons. And their female first family courts ultimately rely on the state that's kept in place by a monopoly on violence backed by a professional force of men under arms.
/r/MensRights24/02/22 01:18 PM
2

Crazy women fight crazy women. There's no White Knight instinct to stop it, and they fight dirty because they operate as if their emotional state determines reality. It's not logic first (e.g. I am responsible for obeying laws). It's emotion first (i.e. I am angry so any act of violence is justified). That's why you should never argue with your hysterical wife. Walk don't talk. She enjoys drama. Women get a kick out of emotions and there isn't the physicality of the numerous beatings and kicking…
/r/MensRights24/02/22 01:16 PM
3

Yeah, it's like a war. There are no rules in war. And a civil war at that between blood relatives. There's no family court outcome that improves on the starting state. It doesn't even pretend to follow the constitution or common law or justice. It's as fair and rational as a hysterically angry woman. It's part of the Marxist frankfurt school's long march through the institutions hatched by Marx when he wrote "aufheben die Familie" (usually translated as abolish the family) in Das Kapital the com…
/r/MensRights24/02/22 12:33 PM
0

I wouldn't expect gratitude. It's a numbers game. If you have the drive, then it should be fun. Work on yourself and ply some game to make them compete for you. Avoid commitment but enjoy her company. If she goes sour then walk don't talk. And if she tries to use gynocratic jujitsu to enslave you then ditch the bitch. Rinse and repeat. Don't advance from playboy to boyfriend or husband unless she's a unicorn (they don't exist).
/r/MensRights24/02/22 12:26 PM
35

"Women are the primary victims of war. Women lose their husbands, their fathers, their sons in combat.", Hillary Clinton at a 1998 D.V. event. That is toxic femininity, shorn of rationality, and taking no responsibility. It makes as much sense as "Men have always been the primary victims of rape. It traumatises their wives, their mothers, and their daughters". The feminists would probably find their rape fantasy realised on a large scale, and the post war economic boom would build a great set of…
/r/MensRights24/02/22 11:36 AM
1

Thanks for the thoughts. I'd add that better at sports points to a shared goal or set of values to judge. But the ideologues would deconstruct that as hetero male white rational logical bad feels. That's why the women's basketball leagues lowered the baskets. That's why they increase pay for lower performance. It's a naked power grab to enslave the male other as provider and protector from nature. A constitution and common law rewriting female majority supremacy movement. Abortion has been estim…
/r/MensRights24/02/22 09:44 AM
14

"just give me all your money", "what's mine is mine, and what's yours is mine", real words that have come out of my wife's mouth. Women evolved to outsource provisioning to men. Until 2010 in England a man had a common law duty to maintain his wife. Until 1970 the husband had conjugal rights. Someone please explain what institution rises to replace the state sponsored single mother free tampon child support ocracy - oh yeas, the female courts where the best interest of the child is whatever the …
/r/MensRights23/02/22 08:46 PM
3

I think it's about child care. I've had a group of teachers abduct my son when he was crying outside kindergarden. Literally rip the crying boy from my arms. Contrary to feminism which demonises mothers, in the hind brain the female drones in the feminine collective embody the belief that childcare is for mommies.
/r/MensRights23/02/22 12:01 PM
1

In UK, the male domestic violence charity is a feminist false flag. Their training includes biased questions to peg you as a perpetrator, ie a person with presumption of guilt and no human rights.
/r/MensRights23/02/22 11:24 AM
1

We could easily train an AI to recognise arousing images. And legally label them as such on any app with more than a city sized user base. Pointing out women producing fomo or prostitution artefacts would probably shame them back into civility. Let's name all the demons.
/r/MensRights23/02/22 10:55 AM
2

We should spread the word on the unconscionable nature of marriage contracts. They're options on the liberty of the man. Hence more valuable to the woman. That's before mentioning the family courts which do not have due process (no presumption of innocence) and are not open. Young men should not sign marriage contracts and avoid women in States with common law marriage.
/r/MensRights23/02/22 10:19 AM
2

Yeah, we're going to end sex apartheid by the gender bigots. Or whatever awful verbiage the post modernists would use to deconstruct fair play and common sense. And oddly enough, we'll get back male female leagues since men will be on top after a season or two of matches. And women will be reincentivised to value their unique calling to the vocation of marriage and motherhood. It's almost like a rape fantasy from a lazy self published fanfiction like 50 shades.
/r/MensRights23/02/22 10:14 AM
1

I tend to agree. It makes me think, we can reboot our morality based on actual evolved psychological/biological tenancies. Even if we've ditched marriage and religion and all that.
/r/MensRights23/02/22 10:10 AM
1

There's magic in the 30s. Jesus carried the cross at age 33. US Presidents must be 35 or over. There's often a reflection and understanding of childhood and family of origin. Often having children of ones own makes one a fully fledged adult. As do elderly parents or an inheritance from burying them. It's at this age we reconcile the Madonna Whore complex in our ideas of women and a creative phase starts in late 30s.
/r/MensRights23/02/22 10:04 AM
-7

But their pain doesn't count? Ho ho. My 3 year old shows off "but I didn't cry though".
/r/MensRights23/02/22 10:01 AM
0

If you don't believe women enjoy interpersonal strife look at the women's magazine section in a shop. Just loads of drama and emotional reactivity that's irrational. Look at the men's section, muscle, cars, boats, fish, and women's bodies.
/r/MensRights23/02/22 09:51 AM
1

Bro, tell her it's fate. She'll go along with that because she's solipsistic and instinctively externalises responsibility for her reality. Problem is if you talk rationally she gets existential fear that you don't love her (womanese for exclusive title to your provisions and protection). Women operate emotion first and actually enjoy interpersonal strife.
/r/MensRights23/02/22 09:47 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter