| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | After going through (or are in) a really nasty marriage/divorce/custody-battle, how do you avoid having a negative attitude in general about all women?"I think lots of men here can attest that the woman they divorced was not the same woman they married." I always believed that marriage included personal compromises that would lead to a shared position a position that represented the relationship rather than the individual. Like I'm a liberal but the relationship is conservative sort of thing. My partner/wife acted more like a special interest group always lobbying for her own interests. She in fact was exactly the same person during divorce th… | /r/MensRights | 28/05/11 05:00 PM |
| 1 | After going through (or are in) a really nasty marriage/divorce/custody-battle, how do you avoid having a negative attitude in general about all women?Good point, but I think we all default to emotionally objectifying to protect ourselves. It's called blame, to make it work for you you need only sell it. These are basic self worth issues. They work the same for both genders. Underlying this is the notion that women experience this as a result of subordination in a relationship. I've always felt this to be bullshit, translation: if I can't control the relationship, I am subordinated, I am oppressed, I am the victim. Once convinced of this all i… | /r/MensRights | 28/05/11 04:23 PM |
| 1 | After going through (or are in) a really nasty marriage/divorce/custody-battle, how do you avoid having a negative attitude in general about all women?Taken literally, the best way to avoid a negative attitude is to avoid women, which is like avoiding evidence that supports a bad attitude. By comparison the best way to avoid a bad attitude with the law is don't get arrested. Works for broccoli too. Emotional boundaries help as do electric fences. | /r/MensRights | 28/05/11 03:59 PM |
| 1 | A New Super Bowl Hoax that Eclipses the Last One in its Sheer Depravitywhy don't you go to the links read the material inform yourself and share something more than your disbelief and lack of ability for thought. You are responsible to inform yourself. | /r/MensRights | 19/01/11 12:18 AM |
| 2 | A New Super Bowl Hoax that Eclipses the Last One in its Sheer DepravityNever mind take back the night......how about the democratic or republican conventions. You don't think there's prostitution going on during a political convention? Probably more than all others combined. | /r/MensRights | 19/01/11 12:12 AM |
| 1 | A New Super Bowl Hoax that Eclipses the Last One in its Sheer DepravityAgain I ask.......Have you stopped beating your girlfriend??? I'm not saying you do or you don't, I'm just concerned about her and her claims!!! | /r/MensRights | 18/01/11 05:55 AM |
| 2 | A New Super Bowl Hoax that Eclipses the Last One in its Sheer Depravity"legions of traffickers" let's put aside the denigration of men for a moment and challenge ourselves as taxpayers. 554 investigations by 4 federally funded task forces in the state of Texas. Yielded a 5% conviction rate IN FOUR YEARS. Sex related CHARGES not convictions yielded less than ONE per month over 48 months. This is a non issue whipped up with hysteria for the likes of you. So put your money where your mouth is. How much will you personally contribute to an incompetent organization of g… | /r/MensRights | 18/01/11 05:13 AM |
| 3 | A New Super Bowl Hoax that Eclipses the Last One in its Sheer Depravity"legions of traffickers" let's put aside the denigration of men for a moment and challenge ourselves as taxpayers. 554 investigations by 4 federally funded task forces in the state of Texas. Yielded a 5% conviction rate IN FOUR YEARS. Sex related CHARGES not convictions yielded less than ONE per month over 48 months. This is a non issue whipped up with hysteria for the likes of you. So put your money where your mouth is. How much will you personally contribute to an incompetent organization of g… | /r/MensRights | 18/01/11 05:13 AM |
| 3 | A New Super Bowl Hoax that Eclipses the Last One in its Sheer Depravity"legions of traffickers" let's put aside the denigration of men for a moment and challenge ourselves as taxpayers. 554 investigations by 4 federally funded task forces in the state of Texas. Yielded a 5% conviction rate IN FOUR YEARS. Sex related CHARGES not convictions yielded less than ONE per month over 48 months. This is a non issue whipped up with hysteria for the likes of you. So put your money where your mouth is. How much will you personally contribute to an incompetent organization of g… | /r/MensRights | 18/01/11 05:11 AM |
| 5 | A New Super Bowl Hoax that Eclipses the Last One in its Sheer Depravity"legions of traffickers" let's put aside the denigration of men for a moment and challenge ourselves as taxpayers. 554 investigations by 4 federally funded task forces in the state of Texas. Yielded a 5% conviction rate IN FOUR YEARS. Sex related CHARGES not convictions yielded less than ONE per month over 48 months. This is a non issue whipped up with hysteria for the likes of you. So put your money where your mouth is. How much will you personally contribute to an incompetent organization of g… | /r/MensRights | 18/01/11 04:46 AM |
| 2 | MRM: Hiding in Plain View?It would seem that men have always been hiding in plain sight. MRA's have been standing at the forefront like fathers to sons asking why. Too many why's have been ignored by MSM and what has been often referred to as a fight for equality. I believe it would be indicative of our culture if a men's movement simply disappeared. After all is that not what men do, is that not what men have always done. | /r/MensRights | 07/12/10 05:04 PM |
| 1 | A thought about the Men's Rights movementWhy constrain ourselves with myopia, or misdirection. Suffragettes of the 19th century were far from original, most simply plagiarized sentiments that were spoken no less than a thousand years before their time. Of course women of the 19th century did not identify themselves as feminists that term was not recognized until the 20th century as an import from France. But heh so much for original. | /r/MensRights | 09/11/10 05:34 AM |
| 1 | Gentlemen, I give you the newest catchphrase for the Men's Rights Movement in response to the "wage gap": The Risk Gap.If men are being paid more than women which I personally do not believe. Why is this an issue for men???????????? When was the last time you heard a woman arguing a mens issue on behalf of men????? If you believe a men's movement has no momentum, why do you fixate on wasting your time with womens issues. It's been all about women's issues for fifty plus years, give it a rest. They are equal now, they don't need all you white knights putting their issues first. Stop allowing them to co-opt the di… | /r/MensRights | 05/11/10 06:02 PM |
| 1 | Gentlemen, I give you the newest catchphrase for the Men's Rights Movement in response to the "wage gap": The Risk Gap.There was a study done in Britain carried out by one of the ministries of industry. When their results showed that in fact women hold most wealth and were receiving higher pay than men, they shelved the study and buried it. Which speaks to their integrity towards equality. | /r/MensRights | 05/11/10 05:47 PM |
| 1 | A thought about the Men's Rights movementThank you. Your reply removes your ambiguity and clarifies your doublespeak. It is obvious that questioning rhetorical dogma is immediately labeled extremist by you. I would not solicit "sympathy" from any quarter of the population for any movement. But I would challenge integrity, intellectual honesty and justice under the law. These tenets require you to give nothing to me or anyone else that you wouldn't give yourself. If it's wrong fix it. Spare us all the rhetoric. Nobody needs to be suckle… | /r/MensRights | 05/11/10 06:37 AM |
| 1 | A thought about the Men's Rights movement"Most feminists are NOT looking to eradicate men" I'm curious would this be like saying most men don't rape women? Or is it only your language that's viable as a defining expression? Just curious if this movement your proposing will also embrace these double standards. Criticizing the language of one gender, while condoning hate speech from the other. Feminism is a hate movement. It is institutionally entrenched as a Corporate Franchise as profitable as any other business. What you are proposing… | /r/MensRights | 05/11/10 03:12 AM |
| 1 | A thought about the Men's Rights movementI would guess that like some you could waste your time arguing with closet feminists and give them more hate ammunition. Or get into your own game and ignore them. The great thing with "gentle, friendly manner" it's hard to deflect the issue that it surrounds. No one has anything crazy to link back to. The course is slow but steady. This isn't desert storm, in most cases your dealing with people who believe that information is being exaggerated or somehow misrepresented. | /r/MensRights | 31/10/10 10:07 PM |
| 2 | A thought about the Men's Rights movementThis is exactly how critical mass will be achieved. Once achieved it will unleash itself by it's own momentum and volition. This is the organic expression of masculinity..without politic, prejudice or restraint. I'm aroused!! | /r/MensRights | 31/10/10 03:36 AM |
| 2 | A thought about the Men's Rights movementA personal view of the MRM does not for me include interaction or more specifically a dialogue with women. Or a requirement to be nice, or solicit feminine support. I believe men first must give themselves rights, primarily the right to understand and perceive their identity in the context of relationships intimate, familial and social. This is being achieved through a dialogue of men. Egalitarian people such as Erin Pizzy are a happenstance of social experience. She is not ideologically driven … | /r/MensRights | 30/10/10 02:11 PM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter