TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

quaggas Archive

View 0 posts and 35 comments by quaggas on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
-1

Not to disagree with your main point, but jobs do pay you when you leave sometimes. You can get severance pay if you are laid off or fired without cause. If you are working a job, you tailor other parts of your lifestyle as if that job is going to continue. You buy or rent a house nearby, and you expect the maintenance of that cost to be covered by the job. So when you lose that job, you use the severance to carry you to the next job. Maybe you have to move, so you can afford to live on your new…
/r/MensRights14/06/19 05:41 PM
5

If you don't elect her, you're a misogynist, obviously.
/r/MensRights26/10/18 06:12 AM
1

Looked pretty good on my girlfriend when she maintained that kind of style for a while.
/r/MensRights12/07/18 04:50 AM
0

You're seriously suggesting that the system that exists now is fair? I sure want the assurance that if I am accused of a crime by anyone, that I will be treated fairly and legally. What rule did she break in this situation? The rule against including someone in a sexual encounter they regret? The rule against sleeping with someone when they and their partner are drunk and both consented (evidenced by him going to get a condom before the encounter)? None of those are illegal, and I would really h…
/r/MensRights01/06/16 07:37 PM
0

But my point still stands. Would you not rather have actual law enforcement investigate potential crimes, rather than an internal HR department with no oversight, no special training in criminal investigation, and no recourse if they think you are guilty? Besides, you don't need a victim that is willing to press charges to still form a case against someone. Victims just make the most compelling evidence. You can still convict someone with only pictures and physical evidence.
/r/MensRights01/06/16 03:47 PM
0

An alleged rapist, because as I have said in almost every reply to you, the truth of the case has not been established. This was not properly investigated by an actual law enforcement body, it was investigated by a university department. Universities do not have the right nor the power to find anyone guilty or innocent of any crime.
/r/MensRights01/06/16 03:44 PM
0

But this woman has still not been tried by a court! Does nobody care about innocent until proven guilty? I am appalled that you don't care about this. No matter what the truth is in this case, every single person deserves a fair trial before they are called a rapist.
/r/MensRights01/06/16 03:41 PM
1

You do realize that is a contradiction though? He accuses her of a crime to one institution, then doesn't to the next. The reason we are talking about this is that crimes should not be investigated by universities. If I am your coworker, and I accuse you of raping me, would you want your boss to take that accusation to the police, or just to HR? If I talk to HR, have you fired for something that you maintain you didn't do, then decide not to press charges, would you not feel like your rights are…
/r/MensRights01/06/16 10:59 AM
1

They should have been required to report rape to the police. How are you not getting this? This young woman, rapist or not, should not have been tried by a university body with no law enforcement oversight. Maybe she is guilty. Fine, how about we let a real court decide that, rather than a Title IX board that has no oversight? Maybe she isn't, and instead, this male student is a false rape accuser. Wouldn't you like to see false accusers punished? Please just take a little step back from this sp…
/r/MensRights01/06/16 10:42 AM
1

Then let's do the right thing, the just thing, and withhold judgement until the courts decide. Were you in her shoes, you would want the same, right?
/r/MensRights01/06/16 10:26 AM
4

And if this is a false claim? Doesn't she, like every accused, deserve to have the truth found out before action is taken against her? Doesn't he, like every accuser, need to prove his assertions correct before action is taken? If the genders were reversed, that would be fair. Treating one gender differently than another is exactly what we are all working against, right?
/r/MensRights01/06/16 10:22 AM
4

The fact that he isn't pressing charges is the point. You should not suffer legal repercussions for non-legal matters. False accusers have been treating the Title IX system as a quick-draw expulsion towards men they don't like for years now. This should be a police matter, as are all crimes. The accused has the right to a real investigation, by real law enforcement. The whole issue with the Title IX outrage for all this time is that the accused is punished without a legal trial, and suffers cons…
/r/MensRights01/06/16 09:58 AM
9

That is an article. When a court of law has determined the truth, then we can make these statements. Reacting to this exact situation of guilty until proven innocent has been a cornerstone of the MRM for years, let's not be sexist because the accused is a woman.
/r/MensRights01/06/16 09:35 AM
1

So now we are talking about the United States, fine. In that case, yeah, many reparations have been made, to little effect. The reserves are basically run as semi-sovereign nations. Native tribe members are free from state taxes, don't have to follow most state laws on the reserve, and have some other privileges. Does this make up for the losses in the past? No. Not at all. But what do you propose? That they are given back the continent? That they are immune from following the laws of the land? …
/r/MensRights30/05/16 08:37 PM
2

He said that rates of domestic violence were highest among indigenous communities. That was a fact based on a recent study, that he was quoting. He made no judgement towards any members of that community, he made no statements about the potential causes, or other factors. It was just a quote. And yeah, sure. European colonists did a lot of bad things. In the 1700s. None of those people are alive today. Let me repeat that. None of them are alive. Guilt is not genetic. Neither I nor you are respon…
/r/MensRights30/05/16 07:24 PM
3

Do you seriously not see the difference between "highest rate of domestic violence" and "most violent?" They are two very different comments with different contexts. Then you go ahead and lay down some good old white guilt into the mix. I can guarantee that Mr. Mark Latham didn't steal a country either. Arguments like this are why we source what we say.
/r/MensRights30/05/16 05:34 PM
4

He said nothing of the sort. He said that the incidence of domestic violence was higher in indigenous communities. To clarify, the difference between what you said and what he said is that his statement was a factually-based single fact based on a study that exists in the world. Your statement was a broad-reaching oversimplification based on a biased interpretation of what someone said once. This is why we measure what we say, to not fall into the trap of "they said X, which means they actually …
/r/MensRights30/05/16 08:56 AM
1

I never said it was comic fans. It was "comic fans"-the people who never cared until the writers decided to pander-who were the audience initially. Comic fans didn't like it for a lot of reasons, and the non-fans who got excited lost interest quite quickly.
/r/MensRights28/05/16 07:26 PM
1

There are Native American tribes that are right now. You can go and ask them. Does that lead to a better society? I have no earthly idea, but I would guess not. Society is about more than just who is in charge.
/r/MensRights28/05/16 06:05 PM
5

I would highly recommend it. And if there is one voice you can trust for all your entertainment needs, it's an anonymous internet guy in an unrelated comment thread.
/r/MensRights28/05/16 06:01 PM
1

The problem with Fem-Thor was that it was a blatant grab at publicity. It was a very attractive conversation topic to the comic community, started a lot of arguments and made some headlines. Then the trend-seeking crowd realized that they didn't care all that much about the character, or the comic. You know what you have when people don't care about your character? A dead comic. It died because the immaculate icing couldn't save a dry and bland cake.
/r/MensRights28/05/16 05:50 PM
8

I think the next logical step is to stop discriminating on less educated or fortunate employees. I have a simple plan, we take the average wage of every employee, from the CEO to the toilet cleaner, and pay everyone the exact same wage. If you disagree, remember that your pay grade derives from your privilege. If you weren't so good in interviews, you would never have been hired.
/r/MensRights27/05/16 07:19 PM
10

And the insurance. As soon as you start administrating a club like that, it's hard to avoid people trying to pin you for accidents.
/r/MensRights29/10/15 07:02 PM
21

I don't really care about or like sports, but even I know that changing the channel away from the game in a bar is really stupid. What about the other 70 people in the bar, many of whom wanted to watch that? I guess they don't matter as much as muh goddess.
/r/MensRights16/08/15 04:42 PM
2

Fuck that "richer or poorer" nonsense, right?
/r/MensRights16/08/15 08:29 AM
6

I couldn't post my comment on the original article, so I'll settle for here. I'm not going to call you names, and I'm glad your open relationship worked out for you, but this article is garbage. Now, don't get me wrong, there is nothing wrong with an open relationship, or a group relationship, or any of that. But this is not a feminist issue. This is you learning to respect your wife and yourself. By writing this in the way you have, you are putting the impetus on all other men, maybe not to fol…
/r/MensRights17/07/15 06:03 PM
5

And I really thought that I had a chance in Discus this time around.
/r/MensRights05/07/15 05:08 AM
3

Yeah, but for some reason, its way less palatable when it's about industry rather than art.
/r/MensRights21/03/15 09:14 PM
2

It's a badly written novel offering a wretched philosophy. I can stomach Rand in The Fountainhead, partly because I read it as all about artistic integrity.
/r/MensRights21/03/15 08:03 PM
2

I wear my jeans until they fall apart, but I just lost about 30 pounds, and had to start all over. I've never hated clothes shopping more. I also wear out my shoes in less than a year, by walking almost everywhere.
/r/MensRights18/08/13 05:49 PM
5

Or they just don't know, and assume anyone who disagrees with them is a misogynist.
/r/MensRights29/01/13 09:59 AM
3

I politely disagree. For me at least, it had much more to do with the idea of equality. If I had been born a few decades earlier, the idea of equality would be much more relevant. Now, equality has been achieved, for the most part, and it is time to throw the brakes on the feminist movement.
/r/MensRights29/01/13 09:21 AM
6

Totally agree. I think TJ TheAmazingAtheist said it best: Feminism is the idea that equality between the genders can be achieved by focusing on the issues of one of them.
/r/MensRights29/01/13 09:09 AM
6

I used to say I agreed with Feminists, but I now think of myself as a Humanist. Feminism on the surface seems like humanism, but it is fundamentally different.
/r/MensRights29/01/13 08:29 AM
11

It feels like he was explaining to a rock. They just asked the same questions over and over. Every category means every category.
/r/MensRights29/01/13 08:25 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter