TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

quandjereveauxloups Archive

View 0 posts and 280 comments by quandjereveauxloups on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
15

Not many here are going to disagree with you. I personally fully agree that idealogues are discriminatory if they demand women being submissive to men (or vice-versa).
/r/MensRights27/07/26 10:03 PM
6

Everyone has barriers. Now, I won't say that women and POC don't have more barriers in some instances, but they aren't as prevalent anymore and fading as time goes. As for the pay gap, the very little of it there actually is, like I said, highly dependent on women's choices. And I never said they don't contribute to the base numbers, you're trying to put words in my mouth. I said the the main reason is women's choices. They choose to not work overtime. They choose to work lower paying office job…
/r/MensRights09/07/26 02:03 PM
7

due to the glass ceiling, maternity leave, etc. The glass ceiling is false. There are too many female CEO's and in other executive positions for that to be a valid argument anymore. It's not the 80's. Maternity leave falls into women's choices. They choose to not work as many hours, or in a lot of the trades that make a good living, and to have babies. It sucks that their career has to suffer for them to have kids, but it also makes sense. There are studies that show the ridiculousness of the pa…
/r/MensRights09/07/26 01:21 PM
1

Oh yeah, thanks! Not sure why I didn't catch that before.
/r/MensRights04/07/26 03:41 PM
1

I'm sorry, but TDS? I'm drawing a blank :p. But yeah, the wording of their first comment showed that they probably wouldn't get it.
/r/MensRights04/07/26 03:11 PM
6

I understand what the post is about. But if you bring a topic up, it's fair game. Also, I wasn't trying to be a dick, I was making a matter-of-fact statement. Nothing more. It's telling that you're not open to that.
/r/MensRights04/07/26 11:27 AM
7

and still carry their AR and guns Not sure if you know, but the "AR" in AR15 stands for Armalite Rifle. So saying carry their AR and guns is redundant, they're both referring to guns.
/r/MensRights04/07/26 11:01 AM
4

https://old.reddit.com/r/science/comments/1qacr0u/a_new_study_in_more_than_15000_men_investigated/ Courtesy of u/Slow_Outcum420.
/r/MensRights04/07/26 10:57 AM
6

It's the UK, so in this instance I have no idea what would happen if the genders were reversed. I know in the US there is a (not widely used) saying that if you want to kill someone, do it with a car. I have seen reports of motorists killing cyclists and only getting misdemeanor charges. I'm not sure if the UK has that saying too, but sadly, this outcome wouldn't surprise me regardless of gender.
/r/MensRights03/07/26 12:09 PM
1

I would guess France?
/r/MensRights01/07/26 12:05 AM
1

It's understandable. I misunderstood it at first, as well, and didn't reread it until I saw a couple other comments referring to it. It took a few times before I saw what they were talking about, it's almost like it's translated straight-across from another language with different formatting rules.
/r/MensRights29/06/26 08:37 PM
15

It took me a couple reads to see what they're saying. But they're saying if the roles were reversed, people would use that example as "proof" of male entitlement to women's bodies. The way it was worded lends to different interpretations, but I don't think they're off base.
/r/MensRights29/06/26 12:41 PM
6

Whether or not that is true has absolutely no bearing on reality. The fact that you defer to insulting them shows you don't have a valid point, or that you base your belief on emotion.
/r/MensRights12/06/26 12:06 PM
6

In an active war scenario? No official is going to authorize any man who doesn't want to fight, to leave. They are trying to hold the country together, while the men are trying to avoid dying. I think the saddest part is the rest of the world hasn't stepped in to stop the war.
/r/MensRights06/06/26 05:29 PM
8

I wasn't aware of that, thanks for letting me know!
/r/MensRights05/06/26 02:55 PM
8

I believe a lot of it is economical. Women have the same (or better) job prospects as men do. Women (some) want providers, so they look for men who make more than them. Usually they have to increase the age range they look at to find men who are stable, established, and higher income. Some younger women just want to be taken care of, so they find an older man well off enough to where she doesn't have to work.
/r/MensRights03/06/26 02:31 PM
12

Honest question: if you honestly hate them and their tweets, why not just block them instead of giving them exposure to more people? I get spreading awareness, but really, these people should not get any more attention than they already do.
/r/MensRights31/05/26 04:36 PM
6

Interesting, and good, to hear! I hope they make things better for men over there!
/r/MensRights29/05/26 01:38 PM
7

I'm not familiar, so I can't say. But I see some of the sexist bullshit coming out of the UK, and wonder how so many people think what they're doing is ok.
/r/MensRights29/05/26 01:21 PM
19

The UK is way worse than the US on that, too.
/r/MensRights29/05/26 01:07 PM
15

Women are notorious for leaving out bits of information that paint them in a negative light. People are notorious for it, not just women. Don't get me wrong, with the info that I have, I'm on his side. But let's not pretend that leaving out info to look better is a mostly feminine trait. I've seen plenty of men do it, too. In my opinion, it's more of an asshole trait rather than a gendered one.
/r/MensRights28/05/26 02:23 PM
6

I'll be honest, I would usually walk away from a conversation like that before they got the chance to say that. I'm too old to get into nonsensical debates with people, I'll just walk away. Usually I would tell them that what they said is so ridiculous, I'm not going to bother saying anything more. I couldn't care less what they think about it, not lumping that kind of stress on myself is more important to me.
/r/MensRights26/05/26 06:14 PM
20

Which is funny because they're saying that young boys in school have more power than the female teachers that are put directly in charge of the boys. So I guess the 12 year old boy seduced and/or overpowered the adult woman into sex and he raped her? Because surely a woman wouldn't consent to sex with a boy, women are better than that! /s
/r/MensRights26/05/26 04:20 PM
21

Most of the people I see being completely irrational and making a scene are women. I think at one point the social conditioning excuse had more merit, but I think it's mostly dead at this point in time.
/r/MensRights20/05/26 02:55 PM
12

And just to note that I can’t entertain any discussion about men generally being more deserving than women - suggesting that there’s a natural hierarchy of ability or value doesn’t hold up scientifically or ethically. I'm not sure why you had to note that, I didn't bring up anything about deserving for anyone. I don't believe people "deserve" their degree or field choice. They have to earn it.
/r/MensRights20/05/26 02:47 PM
18

They aren't, and neither am I. However, if you look at the jobs women are going into, engineering is one that not as many women go for. Shooting for 50/50 representation in any field is a fool's errand. There aren't the same amount of people interested in the same fields. And until you get the same amount of SAHD's as you do SAHM's, there will always be a disparity.
/r/MensRights20/05/26 02:25 PM
7

The only thing I usually say about the past is that feminism was never about equality. Too many people will try to say that it started off good and there are just some bad actors, etc., but there was never a point where it was like that.
/r/MensRights18/05/26 08:51 PM
50

A big issue with feminism is they act like gender equality means making life better for women, when it’s actually about treating men and women the same. I'm sorry, but feminism has never been about equal treatment. There are feminists (who are actually egalitarians) who believe in equal treatment. But the movement itself is about female superiority.
/r/MensRights18/05/26 07:06 PM
4

It can also be in the best interest of the child to know family history of illnesses.
/r/MensRights14/05/26 12:34 PM
14

I’d like nothing more than to see the “women are wonderful and can do no wrong” crowd crumble over the results. First, please understand that I'm overall agreeing with you. But that crowd won't crumble, they'll double-down. Too many of them refuse to see the truth, and will use as many mental gymnastics as necessary to maintain it. As for retroactive, I honestly think that would cost too much. But requiring the test for any child support/paternity suits would be a great step forward.
/r/MensRights13/05/26 07:41 PM
5

I am yet to discuss it in real life with some feminists Don't. It will always be one excuse or another. You can't argue with people who will not argue in good faith.
/r/MensRights07/05/26 05:37 PM
23

Ah, the old: "he was an asshole and therefore deserved it" defense.
/r/MensRights29/04/26 02:26 PM
5

I just trimmed my rose bush, and have a couple good looking branches. If you like thorns, I've got the girl for you!
/r/MensRights28/04/26 12:45 PM
7

It's also severely underreported. Could be fear of the partner, knowing nothing will happen from it, and a misplaced definition of masculinity.
/r/MensRights24/04/26 05:36 PM
2

First, I appreciate that you were clear that you didn't mean all men. Second, I have only seen one instance of men being mad about a woman's space. It was a while after women-only gyms came up. What had happened is no one was mad about a woman-only space, until feminism also started breaking into men-only spaces. When all of men-only spaces were under attack, men only went after the women-only gyms. To follow your lead, I don't mean all of feminists/men/women. Many people just didn't care and th…
/r/MensRights22/04/26 07:58 PM
8

Trans Exclusive Radical Feminist.
/r/MensRights22/04/26 07:44 PM
9

Have to say, when the term "Canadian women are...", it's a blanket statement that does mean all. Even saying a majority is a bit of a stretch, in my opinion. Maybe if you said a majority of the women you interact with, it would be a better descriptor?
/r/MensRights22/04/26 03:56 PM
11

Porque no los dos?
/r/MensRights22/04/26 01:28 PM
2

I actually attended a semester at a university and checked out the gym. There was no segregated space or hours, people were just expected to act like adults. And that's the real problem, some people don't want to act like adults. When I go to the gym, I pick a spot to look at while I lift, then concentrate on what I'm doing. Some people aren't capable of that, they have to stare at the women or record everything, or assume any man looking somewhere is looking at them.
/r/MensRights22/04/26 01:23 PM
2

Even old school stuff like chivalry, men stand on the side closest to the road so the car hits him instead as if men can shrug off car hits. Just to let you know, it started because people used to have chamber pots they would void themselves in, then literally throw it out the window into the street. Men would stand on the outside so if someone did that while they were walking with a woman, it would get on them instead of the woman.
/r/MensRights22/04/26 01:19 PM
16

I have no doubt it'll turn into an avalanche. That's why I would either fight to get it changed, or leave. I'm a firm believer in voting with my wallet, regardless if there are 100 people waiting to take my place.
/r/MensRights21/04/26 09:22 PM
106

From the article: “How can we do it and advertise it so students know it’s a space for them, but still open to all?” You can't. If it's a safe space because men aren't allowed, then it's not open to all. You would think with all the cognitive dissonance they would have realized somewhere that those two things are mutually exclusive. And it's for 2 hours a week. Which is good for the men who want to work out there. But it's still discriminatory. Personally, I would find out how hard I would have …
/r/MensRights21/04/26 05:13 PM
1

I'm sorry you had that experience. It's really fucked up that he did that to you. I hope you are happy with your life as it is now.
/r/MensRights21/04/26 02:15 PM
2

My vision of true equality is that everyone should be equally sexualized. I think you're on to something there, friend.
/r/MensRights21/04/26 02:11 PM
9

Still comes down to women hating men for women's issues. It's still completely unfair, and not something that should be defended.
/r/MensRights16/04/26 04:07 PM
7

And women aren't as aggressive or oppressive towards men as men are to women so gay men largely have no reason to be misogynistic. Lol wut?
/r/MensRights16/04/26 04:02 PM
7

So imagining not having privileges as a woman would make men grow cold? Lol. I get that it sucks for many women out there cause some guys can't filter themselves (and they should be called out for it). But saying that lesbians hate men more because they don't get "average female privilege" shows a bigger problem with the lesbian community than anything else.
/r/MensRights16/04/26 04:00 PM
40

If you're in the UK, that's the best idea for you. If I lived there, I would try to move someplace where I wouldn't have my life destroyed by someone I've never met, just because they want attention or whatever.
/r/MensRights15/04/26 06:31 PM
234

Feminists are arguing for equity in employment so that they have 50/50 of every single role. I have to interject there: they want 50% female employment in cushy high-paying jobs. They're not beating down the doors to be plumbers, boilermakers, roofers, etc.
/r/MensRights03/04/26 08:15 PM
23

Aren’t the leaders men ? Feminists didn’t draft men for the wars whatsoever. The "leaders" pander to whoever will keep them in power. They don't have to believe in the laws that they make, because they know they and their families will be exempt. All they care about is keeping power and pushing their agenda which keeps them in power.
/r/MensRights03/04/26 08:13 PM
1

Well, since one of the mods posted it, I would say it came from the mod who posted it. Or some really interesting interpretation of what was in the article.
/r/MensRights28/03/26 03:37 PM
3

Which country has laws about gender equality, and actually exercises them?
/r/MensRights28/03/26 03:33 PM
0

Why would I throw logic out the window to put myself at the forefront? It is what it is. If humanity survives the next world war, women will start being protected as a valuable commodity (not saying women are objects), and men will be on the forefront of any type of fighting. Because most likely, they will be able to afford losing some men.
/r/MensRights24/03/26 07:01 PM
2

The fact that one man can produce many children and women can only produce a limited amount. Add the fact that women cannot procreate while already pregnant and gestation is ~9 months, it makes women more vital to the survival of the species. Also take into account that childbirth is 0% risk for men and can be deadly for women, the amount of women who can reproduce dwindles. There is also a limit on how many kids a woman can have, while men can reproduce well into later years. Say you have 20 me…
/r/MensRights24/03/26 05:45 PM
11

If you look at a purely propagation-of-the-species viewpoint, men are more expendable than women, but not completely expendable.
/r/MensRights24/03/26 05:35 PM
5

No, because any man can fill that spot. But if women are down for a longer period (9 months), they are more valuable.
/r/MensRights24/03/26 05:33 PM
1

In the US (not sure if it's used everywhere), we have a term called penis envy. They want to have one, but don't, and they are envious. They take it out on men because that's what they wish they were.
/r/MensRights16/03/26 01:42 PM
3

I was just asking why people are quick to call it misogynistic Because it takes men out of the available pool for women. Supply and demand is one of their main strengths. If you reduce the supply, the demand can increase. Some women take advantage of that (a lot of the over-demanding women), because they're relying on the lack of supply to make their life for them. If you start taking men out of the available pool, it reduces demand. Reduced demand means the product has less value. Aka, women wo…
/r/MensRights10/03/26 02:16 PM
10

Judge Clarke said: 'I take the view that she was a sexual predator. This has taken resources away from genuine crime and genuine victims.' So Judge Clarke does not see false allegations as a real crime, and does not see men as real victims. I think the sad part is that I see this so much, I automatically assume it's the UK. I can't help from feeling bad for the gents in the UK who have to deal with this bullshit.
/r/MensRights09/03/26 01:51 PM
2

Who the fuck calls it romping? Looking at the end of the URL the article came from, it was the UK. It is not legally possible to rape a man in the UK, plus they are playing hardcore feminism over there.
/r/MensRights03/03/26 12:39 AM
3

r/lostredditors
/r/MensRights03/03/26 12:37 AM
12

I got slapped in the face by a woman, at a bus stop (during daytime), just for asking how she was doing. I literally asked the same way I would ask any stranger, regardless of gender. I told that story once when someone said women don't commit violence unless they're pushed to. I got blamed for somehow asking her how she's doing, the wrong way? And then others said that something probably happened to her, and I should not be upset about it. Any time I tried to defend myself, I got downvoted to h…
/r/MensRights01/03/26 03:25 PM
3

The only things I would add is to the end of point 6. Paternity tests should be mandatory for all live births, and no circumcision under the age of 16-18 without medical necessity.
/r/MensRights27/02/26 07:17 PM
7

Honestly I'm all for women being in the workplace. The days where an average divorced man could pay alimony and child support while still having a decent place to live. Nowadays, it could put them in a refrigerator box under an overpass. But the divorce laws and precedents need to be changed to catch up to the times.
/r/MensRights25/02/26 09:05 PM
6

What's really fun is the NY Times someone made a context post that blows her whole tweet to smithereens. Edit to add: mistakenly thought it was NYT that made the comment.
/r/MensRights25/02/26 08:58 PM
6

California has a history of throwing out prenups. I wish we could normalize it, but the courts view women far too favorably to accomplish it.
/r/MensRights20/02/26 05:21 PM
9

I'm a stay-at-home-dad, my wife is the breadwinner. Tell me again how she's a prostitute?
/r/MensRights20/02/26 05:19 PM
30

Even if it isn't, the chance that someone in a similar situation may see it and be helped is worth it, imo.
/r/MensRights19/02/26 07:58 PM
7

The confusion is why you have a either for or against mindset. No one said women's lives are disposable. We're saying men's lives aren't more disposable than women's. But you take that as saying women's lives are? You need to up your reading comprehension and maybe stop trying to be offended.
/r/MensRights10/02/26 11:18 PM
8

I'm saying that women's lives aren't more important that men's lives. I'm also saying men shouldn't be obligated to protect women. To say women need men's protection infantilizes them, and says that they're incapable of protecting themselves. Not only is that notion misogynistic, it's misandristic, and against equality.
/r/MensRights10/02/26 10:14 PM
9

Where did I say that? Are you perhaps attributing a comment I didn't make, to me?
/r/MensRights10/02/26 09:11 PM
19

I mean, you're basically infantilizing women by saying that they aren't capable of taking care of themselves. And why is it more important for men's lives to be disposable than women's?
/r/MensRights10/02/26 02:33 PM
14

My wife is physically affectionate a lot. And if I ever feel like I need it, all I have to do is ask. It works the other way, too. When she starts feeling overwhelmed, she'll lay her head on my chest and listen to my heart beat. I can actually feel the tension leave her body when she does that.
/r/MensRights09/02/26 04:43 PM
5

Are you actually saying that if a man stabbed a woman to death, the comments would all be people saying it was ok for him to do it? That we can't ruin his bright future? If so, you're living in completely different reality than the rest of us.
/r/MensRights08/02/26 02:55 PM
4

Especially in this post Ozympic world, you can't tell which woman is a feminist that will falsely accuse from a sane one. Are you trying to say that only larger women are feminists who will falsely accuse you? Like, that's a really fucked up brush to paint with. I agree with the rest. They won't see how wrong their ideals are, and that's what's needed.
/r/MensRights05/02/26 06:20 PM
8

But why the sexism? As ridiculous as I see some things in the UK go, my only guess is that they made a big show about supporting women initially, and now they have to keep doing things to keep the money/power flowing. They're basically grasping at straws now to have a headline to stay relevant. Because as soon as they can't do anything else for women, they'll look for someone who can.
/r/MensRights29/01/26 03:16 PM
-1

I don't know for sure, but logically, they probably don't have women in the goon squads.
/r/MensRights28/01/26 01:25 PM
8

Did you see the country? Australia is almost as lenient on women as the UK.
/r/MensRights27/01/26 08:12 PM
1

milktoast Just to let you know, the proper spelling is "milquetoast". You're meaning still comes across, though.
/r/MensRights27/01/26 06:02 PM
9

I can see where you're coming from, but it's a pretty jaded view. I was in a car wreck and was in shock. Men and women that didn't even know me came out to help. No one asked me how I felt about women. If I see someone stuck and I'm able to help, I probably will. Man or woman, or however they identify doesn't matter to me. The only thing that would make me abandon them like that is if someone else showed up to help, or they were being rude to me. If I'm actively helping and a woman degrades men,…
/r/MensRights26/01/26 03:31 PM
9

Since he was a carpenter, I would imagine his skin would have been at least a bit darker brown from working outside. Not black, but definitely not white.
/r/MensRights25/01/26 02:19 PM
2

Domo arigato, Mr. Roboto ;)
/r/MensRights25/01/26 02:16 PM
16

Come on now, you aren't allowed to lower their dating pool. /s
/r/MensRights24/01/26 08:58 PM
16

That doesn't surprise me.
/r/MensRights20/01/26 11:45 PM
26

"Women fear for their lives rejecting men at a bar and walking back to their car" So why do they go to the bar? Why don't they create a space women can go to where they don't have to worry about that?
/r/MensRights20/01/26 07:28 PM
3

It makes sense that you'd hire the poor person because they must've faced more adversity right. That's a critical flaw in her thinking. Why would someone automatically hire a poor person because they may have had to struggle more with their life? All else being equal, I would make new criteria. Who interviewed better? Who seemed to have a better grasp of the requirements? Make different tests to ask questions about different things, and see who can shift their thinking better. It's one of the re…
/r/MensRights17/01/26 05:08 PM
0

I'm not the DA and don't know the details. I do know that there are too many people who get unfairly light sentencing. I would encourage other Virginians to write to their representatives and have this looked into.
/r/MensRights17/01/26 12:11 AM
1

doesn't acknowledge how favorable the plea deal should be (yes I know there's probably a lot that goes into that) or which cases seem to warrant the full ire of the state. There is a lot that goes into that, and it's a case-by-case basis. Someone familiar with practicing criminal law may be able to give insight. And they'll know a hell of a lot more than me :p. The cases that get the full ire, if I'm not mistaken, are pretty much the ones that are too high profile or don't get a plea. Even murde…
/r/MensRights16/01/26 11:19 PM
17

In the US, white men are not a protected class. It's impossible to legally speaking commit a hate crime against a white male. Because some victims are white and some are black, it's harder to prove hate crime. If any victims were girls, or all the male victims were non-white, they could probably get it.
/r/MensRights16/01/26 11:08 PM
7

Not a legal expert, but pleas tend to be done to save the taxpayers some money. Do I think she should get the max? Yes. But it will cost the state a lot more money to go through the whole trial. So, they let her plead guilty, and she gets a reduced sentence. Saves time and money, and justice is allegedly served. In this case, I would donate to a fund to fully prosecute people like her.
/r/MensRights16/01/26 11:05 PM
24

Many men will laugh because it's a coping mechanism. Same reason many men develop very dark senses of humor. When you have no other outlet for the bad shit happening, laughing can help.
/r/MensRights13/01/26 07:02 PM
2

it's irking you because you've become oversensitive to people ragging on men. I've been dealing with that for 49 years, so it's not that. I usually just shrug and let it go. I think it really is just that I'm so sick of people discussing women's issues, and people saying "what about men". It's an issue women deal with, keep it about women. In here, we were talking about negative things women have done, and you came in and said "what about men". You also come across as incredibly patronizing and …
/r/MensRights13/01/26 06:57 PM
3

If it helps, this internet stranger is very proud of you for that. It sucks that your therapist was that bad. I would have been pissed, personally. But you're on the right track for you, and that's fucking amazing.
/r/MensRights13/01/26 05:19 PM
2

but let's not be unfair in the OTHER direction; Please forgive me if I'm being an asshole. But something about that sentence irks me, and I'm trying to put my finger on why. I think most of it is that it's taking a discussion about things women have done, and saying "well what about men". On the other hand, correcting misinformation is incredibly important. But in this case, I don't think it was the right way to do it. The problem with Elizabeth is that the veracity of the claims has always been…
/r/MensRights13/01/26 03:03 PM
3

I am so sorry you went through that, friend. I hope you have a support system that can help. Not trying to push it on you, but if you haven't tried therapy, it may be able to help. There are male therapists out there that deal with men's trauma.
/r/MensRights13/01/26 02:49 PM
13

Men are the victims of random violence more than women. Men are generally less safe than women when walking around at night. But of course the night time streets are only safe for men, and there's a rapist on every corner.
/r/MensRights13/01/26 02:45 PM
5

Yup. If men were a hivemind and inclined to rape whoever whenever, we would probably live in a "free use" world. I won't lie, I think it would be awesome to have a free use world. However, I would be 100% against it if anyone was not on board. I would never want it to be forced.
/r/MensRights13/01/26 02:44 PM
2

If you took that as heated ranting, that's projection on your part. There was nothing heated about it. Condescending? Yeah, I'll give you that. And if you don't understand what that was supposed to be, maybe try re-reading it a few times and see how it connects to the comment I was referring to? If you still don't get it, I'm sorry, I'm not going to take the time to explain it any further.
/r/MensRights08/01/26 08:42 PM
1

I'm not, but I am part of the Grammar Police. I'm here to serve and correct :p. But really, they need to get called out. How you wrote your comment was correct, and they completely missed the point of your post.
/r/MensRights08/01/26 05:21 PM
1

I'm very sorry it happened to you. I hope you are able to get any help you need. To answer your question of why should we sympathize: because we're still all humans. We can care that something horrible has happened to someone. I don't know you, but my heart goes out to you. I believe that "believe all victims" is, to a point, bullshit. I look at it more from a law enforcement/investigative viewpoint, though. If a victim comes to me, regardless of gender, I will believe them until an investigatio…
/r/MensRights08/01/26 04:38 PM
1

I'm sorry, but it's not obvious. u/DentdeLion_ specified they're sorry that person did that to OP and other people didn't give support. So when OP said: people not person, the obvious thing to do is replace the one instance of person with people, not understand that they're referring to something that was already said correctly.
/r/MensRights08/01/26 04:29 PM
1

its a well documented fact that women receive lighter sentences for the exact crime Edit to add: I completely agree that women do, overall, receive lighter sentences. I am not arguing that point at all. Here's the fun part about that: all cases are different, and sometimes one person deserves more time than the other. If that AI answer is correct, he literally deserves more time because he did a lot more in the fraud scheme. It's ok to call out the differences between male and female sentencing,…
/r/MensRights05/01/26 03:16 PM
0

I use AI Overview for some information. It can be good and helpful. I would never use it for gendered arguments. AI has been trained to favor women over men. And while a more diverse workplace can outperform a more narrow one, it still depends on the people in it.
/r/MensRights03/01/26 04:09 PM
1

Oh please. They'll still be out there hating men, but hoping a rich, handsome, loving, bad-boy will sweep them off their feet and keep them rich and entertained.
/r/MensRights03/01/26 04:05 PM
25

For a minute, let make a mental leap worthy of those feminists: They're trying to normalize sexually abusing children. If the students are incels, and the colleagues want to stop them from being incels, that could mean that they want to be the cause of them not being celibate. Sounds to me like they're trying to normalize female educators grooming and causing these boys from being incels.
/r/MensRights20/12/25 05:44 PM
11

Don't worry friend, your English is good enough to be understood. Good on you for learning a new language, and keep at it!
/r/MensRights19/12/25 05:33 PM
9

This is not a list pointed at actually protecting children. This is a list to ban any type of sex-change operations before someone turns 18. It is literally anti-trans, and that's pretty much it. No politician cares about male circumcision, unless they care about the anti-aging products they/their partner uses, or they're monetarily invested in such items.
/r/MensRights19/12/25 05:31 PM
10

I hear people saying that women discount their feelings and make them feel shitter. But the comment section on so many reels/ posts/ newstories often suggest that it is men discounting the feelings of fellow men. My ex-wife always told my son, when he was young, to man up if he got hurt. That's how she raised him after she remarried. Boys were tough and didn't cry. In the little time I had him, I tried to teach him it's ok to cry, it's ok to hurt, and if he got hurt when he was with me, I comfor…
/r/MensRights19/12/25 05:23 PM
24

Of course not. It's a female revenge fantasy of how oppressed they feel, and how hard they have to fight to get out of it. It's not based in reality. When Trump won the first election, some people were literally terrified that Handmaid's Tale was going to come to 100% fruition.
/r/MensRights16/12/25 05:14 PM
9

I agree, and not just Canada. It should be illegal everywhere.
/r/MensRights16/12/25 04:48 PM
14

It is in Ontario: Horne v. Public Service Alliance of Canada 2024 https://www.canlii.org/en/on/onhrt/doc/2024/2024hrto1788/2024hrto1788.html [17] The respondent submitted that the Plan is a “special program” within the meaning of s. 14 of the Code, the purpose of which is to protect affirmative action programs and to promote substantive equality. It asserted that section 14 is a complete defence to an allegation of discrimination when, as here, the challenge to the program comes from someone who…
/r/MensRights16/12/25 03:30 PM
22

Why does race need to come into it? Nobody here is denying that black people have had a huge influence on music.
/r/MensRights11/12/25 06:58 PM
19

I disagree. We need misandry to be a much more widely known and reviled world, much like misogyny is among many.
/r/MensRights11/12/25 06:56 PM
5

If you read through the comments, you'll see people saying shit like: it's just a joke/you can tell she was joking/etc. Then in the same post say that the album gave them the impression: men=bad, sex=good. When I pointed out the hypocrisy, I got downvoted to hell. Gotta remember to make a throwaway for any comments that show a person's hypocrisy.
/r/MensRights11/12/25 06:52 PM
1

What's weird? He saved her from being raped as a literal child. Then he had sex with her...checks notes...at the appropriate age for the time period. Was it rape? Who knows? But holding todays lens to ancient history is going to show major flaws. They did what was appropriate at the time. Just like today, we do what we consider appropriate. In a couple thousand years, people will look back at what we did and call us barbarians. It wouldn't be fair for them to look at us through their lens, becau…
/r/MensRights11/12/25 06:22 PM
-1

He married her when she was nine. I believe the "normal" age for starting sex back then was 14-15. I'm not sure what was so hard about comprehending my post. Let me try breaking it down more: 1.) He married her when she was nine to prevent her uncle from raping her. 2.) He waited until she was the right age, in this case probably 14-15, before he consummated the marriage. Also, I did say I'm defending it, I also said I wasn't even sure if it was true. If he did rape her at 9, then I would absolu…
/r/MensRights11/12/25 06:15 PM
9

In case you couldn't tell, we want equal rights and responsibilities for men and women. We don't all believe women should stay in the home unless escorted by a male relative. Islam is still pretty far behind with how it treats women, most of us here don't believe women are below us.
/r/MensRights11/12/25 03:06 PM
-1

Not defending it or even saying it's true, but I've heard that he married her to keep her from being raped by her uncle, and didn't consummate until she was the right age[, I believe it was 14-15 at that time]. Of course, that could be copium. But you're 100% right, no Abrahamic religion is the answer. Most others aren't, either. Edited for people who somehow thought I was defending child rape.
/r/MensRights11/12/25 03:00 PM
8

Realistically many women want to pay half anyway, because they don’t want to be creating an expectation, which his narrative promotes. I'm not in today's dating world, and if I was, I would be in a higher age bracket than most. That being said, in my age bracket, it could be hit or miss. I've known women on both sides of the fence, but I think many women in my generation expect the man to pay, still. It would be interesting to hear from some younger people, but I've seen in here (and the r/Niceg…
/r/MensRights09/12/25 08:34 PM
3

I think I see what you're saying. Definitely easy to misread, I would recommend editing it so clear up what you mean.
/r/MensRights09/12/25 06:55 PM
2

By all means, do. Most men can't make that claim, though I know a few guys who have a much higher number than me. But I was a turbo-slut when I was younger. I had a lot of fun, got passed around friend groups, etc. I wasn't looking for lovers, I was looking for sex.
/r/MensRights09/12/25 06:24 PM
25

“A woman is not going to have sex with a man who splits the bill with her.” Has no one seen how fucked up this is? I'm not going on a date to get laid, I'm going on a date to get to know the person. He's not only telling men they're the problem, he's reducing women to sexual objects to be bought. The whole splitting the check thing started when women started making more money, and was a way to help prevent date rape. Too many men who grew up in the 50's-70's (some people are still like this now)…
/r/MensRights09/12/25 05:18 PM
7

Lol, I've had sex with over 100 women. Guess how many dates I paid the whole bill for?
/r/MensRights09/12/25 05:12 PM
14

You can absolutely trash feminism and still accept what it's supposed to be. Feminism is supposed to be about equality. I accept the premise of equality. Feminism is actually about female supremacy, and that's how it ruined society. And we can all absolutely trash it, because the movement says it's one thing when it's really something completely different.
/r/MensRights09/12/25 05:11 PM
7

I definitely agree, and part of why I spoke of preparedness. My grandma used to tell me that if I don't go places where bad things usually happen, there's a good chance nothing bad will happen to me. Of course, I did the opposite. I was also very lucky, but I still have to say that a majority of the people are at least not bad.
/r/MensRights30/11/25 06:46 PM
10

I'm, at a point now where I find it harder and harder to care that these people make their own life worse by holding all of these ridiculous notions. Can't walk safely at night? Why the fuck are you trying to walk in dangerous neighborhoods at night? Oh. Not unsafe neighborhoods? Why the fuck are you scared? Better yet, take some personal responsibility. I hate seeing how much women tell men we need to teach other men, or do this or that so they feel safe. First, if they want men to know somethi…
/r/MensRights30/11/25 06:18 PM
3

It's so bad and destructive I almost feel like some of this behavior is a psyop to help make the most hateful conservatives ever more popular. It's like they're trying to turn the world into an "us vs them" world where it's a battle for who gets to have rights and who doesn't. That's exactly what both sides are doing. Creating rifts and divides so they keep money and power. Don't get me wrong, I'm not saying both sides are equally bad. But the Dems have some things they need to fix, and the Repu…
/r/MensRights25/11/25 03:05 PM
16

Crime is one part of equality. And I seriously doubt most women would want their sentences to match men. They're already trying to get rid of women's prisons in the UK. And the real problem, I think, is that you're not willing to take on anyone's points. You keep deflecting and being condescending. If you came here just to troll, I hope you're happy with yourself. If you came to have a discussion, you did a horrible job.
/r/MensRights21/11/25 09:28 PM
2

No. Unfortunately, that would have been throwing my vote away. I wish we had a good 3rd party, though.
/r/MensRights20/11/25 01:50 PM
1

I'm a left-leaning centrist, as I said above. Probably pretty easy to guess.
/r/MensRights20/11/25 01:35 PM
1

I think what you might be missing is that "common sense" regulations to you are a slippery slope to others. I'm a left-leaning centrist and gun owner, and I don't trust the Dems to not take away gun rights. Just like I don't trust the Republicans to not take human rights. Please understand, I really, really don't want to get into a gun control debate. I will say there are some Dems that absolutely want all the guns, and others that aren't so rabid. All I'm saying is, as a party, the Dems need to…
/r/MensRights19/11/25 09:44 PM
2

I'm not confused or spiteful. I just really don't feel up to debating this. You seem like you're acting purposely obtuse, and it just doesn't seem worth the effort to interact with you.
/r/MensRights19/11/25 09:03 PM
4

Yeah, I'm not going to talk in circles with you. Please re-read the thread so you don't lose your place. It's pretty obvious what I'm talking about.
/r/MensRights19/11/25 06:44 PM
3

I'd say cherry picking. Pick one of the multiple points that's easiest to turn, and focus on that. Then you can ignore everything else.
/r/MensRights19/11/25 06:41 PM
8

You've never heard of feminism?
/r/MensRights19/11/25 06:39 PM
10

The common denominator here is feminists. Going into feminists subs is never going to give you a fair chance. I've seen women go into feminist subs, bring up men, then get destroyed for it. There are "feminists" out there that are actually for equality, but most are out for female supremacy. You will never get a fair shake on a feminist subreddit, if you let them know you're male. The left is about promoting feminism, etc. The left does equal misandry. They are constantly pandering to women's is…
/r/MensRights19/11/25 06:36 PM
26

They're honestly probably just being "internet tough", or running with fantasies because they feel powerless. I have revenge fantasies sometimes, usually when I'm driving. I am not taking the chance of hurting a bunch of people over 1 dumbass. The problem will come with those who internalize what they're saying. Where it becomes less of a fantasy, and more of a hope, then into a lifestyle. And honestly, while their methods are abhorrent and should not be tolerated, I would love to see what would…
/r/MensRights18/11/25 02:48 PM
13

That's interesting, thanks!
/r/MensRights13/11/25 06:24 PM
13

That's a good point, thanks for bringing it up!
/r/MensRights13/11/25 06:11 PM
26

Feminarchy Is that a term being used? I would think "matriarchy" would fit better.
/r/MensRights13/11/25 05:39 PM
27

And the fun part is, it's a double-edged sword! If they only have conscription for men, they will (hopefully) have a greater amount of options of jobs. When they bring women in, they generally get fewer combat choices and more admin choices. That forces more men to take combat roles, because the admin roles were all taken by women. There's no truly fair way of doing it that I can think of right now, but I know there are better ways. But the governments would have to give up their facade of femin…
/r/MensRights13/11/25 05:39 PM
4

Hard to tell them they're wrong when they gang up and downvote you so much the comment isn't seen anymore :p. Too many of them can't see past their own nose, though. But you're right, MR isn't about sexism, and it doesn't require misogyny to survive. It only needs misandry.
/r/MensRights12/11/25 05:55 PM
20

Here's an opinion that I usually find to be unpopular. I usually expect better, too. However, ever since they closed the incel subreddit, we got a lot of unsavory (because of their words and actions, not due to just being an incel) characters. I've seen threads in here that make me want to unsub, but there are still a lot of good threads. If the more extreme types are in the thread, anything other than "hurr durr women bad" gets you downvoted to hell. I would hope it would get downvoted to hell …
/r/MensRights12/11/25 05:00 PM
11

All I see is someone racist against white people. Maybe reassess yourself and your beliefs on race?
/r/MensRights10/11/25 06:02 PM
15

Just like some people think all men are trash, some people think all white men are racist. It's pretty sad, but some people just don't have good interactions with those from other races. Or, they believe propaganda designed to keep the race divide going.
/r/MensRights10/11/25 06:01 PM
94

Young women don't want boyfriends, all of it is men's fault.
/r/MensRights07/11/25 02:14 PM
32

Some women never get "baby fever". Other women have a strong biological clock that can drive them towards doing crazy things (it's not a justification). Every person is different. I've known men who go baby-crazy because they really want to be a father.
/r/MensRights07/11/25 02:11 PM
14

I'm not trying to sound like a dick, but it may come across that way: Stop worrying about some future potential boogeyman, and teach your daughter how to take care of herself. Teach her to pay attention to her surroundings, and always have an escape route. Teach her self-defense (that actually works) that will help her escape. Teach her to not fear every man because they could be a rapist. Teaching your daughter to be comfortable and confident in herself is one of the best things you can do.
/r/MensRights07/11/25 01:06 AM
1

I mean, Musk and Trump are doing the same things. At least Musk has stayed out of the news since he stole all the data he wanted.
/r/MensRights31/10/25 09:11 PM
3

That happened on my last account. It said something like you have to delete all posts and comments from this sub on your history, then basically apologize and promise to be a good boy. I don't remember the exact wording, but it was demeaning as fuck. And it's why I didn't put it on this account after my last was banned. I'm not going to grovel for my beliefs, nor change them just to be a part of a sub.
/r/MensRights31/10/25 09:06 PM
7

Personally, I prefer to be blocked. If they're so stuck in delusions that they can't see that men have problems, I don't want to be there.
/r/MensRights31/10/25 09:02 PM
1

I mean, they didn't. It doesn't change that they're over-privileged today, but let's not pretend that there were not times in history where women were oppressed. Before the 1960's were a bad time for many women. They were vulnerable in many different ways. A man could get a woman pregnant, then go to a different state, join the military, and be gone. Or if a man just up and left. Women weren't able to get into some of the better-paying jobs to take care of themselves/any kids involved. Of course…
/r/MensRights28/10/25 10:04 PM
4

And a soft girl lifestyle. Funny how they went from having to have every opportunity a man does, to having to also have a lifestyle where she's solely supported by a man.
/r/MensRights18/10/25 11:46 PM
8

How about the example of underaged boys having to pay child support to their former teacher/rapist?
/r/MensRights18/10/25 11:44 PM
12

I think if her idea is to go into an all-male space and just kill some men because feminism makes it ok, she should just stop having ideas. But yeah, there are better places that will bring much more attention for her to sneak into.
/r/MensRights16/10/25 06:22 PM
3

contains an inbuilt (and probably erroneous) assumption that men will rebuild do everything for them. As a blanket statement it doesn't work. there are many capable and willing women out there. But just like that city that's in (I think) Mexico, men can be there during the day to fix the things they don't have the skills or strength to work on. Makes me wonder if it's going to turn into the same thing anywhere else they do it.
/r/MensRights16/10/25 04:01 PM
18

Notice that her narrative is based on harm, disruption and anger. Like the part about landing, killing some monks, and having to explain she did it for feminism. Can she hear herself? Does she think that's ok? Too much feminism is a revenge fantasy against imagined or past oppression. And all current men are guilty, so it's ok. It just boggles my brain.
/r/MensRights16/10/25 03:58 PM
2

I wrote this long rant as a reply to another comment that looks pretty buried. I believe it waw one of your comments, OP, but I wanted others to be able to see it more easily if they're willing to do the reading. It does answer your question of what I think, though not in the way most people would think. And for reference, I am a man. I've been in that woman's situation a couple times. If you don't know what it's like, you're lucky. You also don't know shit about what it can do to you. Part of y…
/r/MensRights13/10/25 05:21 PM
19

I mean, how many times have men been called sexist because some Hollywood woman-power movie flopped? They literally say that it flopped because men didn't support it, when it was garbage that men didn't want to support. My favorite line of questions for feminists is: 1.) you're a feminist, so you're for equality, right? 2.) if you're for equality, which mens' issues do you fight for? It usually ends with them saying something that proves they're for female superiority, or they blow up and deflec…
/r/MensRights11/10/25 01:13 PM
17

Ya'll are also forgetting the fact that when they started dating, he was 15 and she was 18. They moved in together when he was 16. I know the UK has a different age of consent law, but I believe that's still illegal. And how long did they know each other before dating?
/r/MensRights06/10/25 03:30 PM
8

I have direct experience with that. Please understand, my primary concerns for any of my children is/was that they are healthy and happy. Gender was a tertiary concern A lot of people lost respect for me when I was disappointed we were having a girl. I took a lot of shit for that. I didn't love her any less, and when she was born, any leftover disappointment disappeared. People just looked at me like I was crazy when I was disappointed my second was not a girl. I was actually hoping for another …
/r/MensRights03/10/25 04:58 PM
13

Not getting into the rest of the disagreement, but asking if someone would say that about a baby is a strawman argument, at best. I'm all for discussing, but at least, please, do it in good faith.
/r/MensRights28/09/25 06:34 PM
6

I have a feeling that most of the women who subscribe to that bullshit are the same that subscribe to the "men are afraid women will laugh at them, women are afraid men will kill them" bullshit. Too many are either internet tough people and don't fully believe it in reality, or they're too scared to say it to someone's face. Of course, not realizing most men would be surprised and probably apologize for the woman's experience.
/r/MensRights22/09/25 07:21 PM
10

But it's ok, because it makes them feel better, and it's not like they think all men are really like that. And of course everyone knows they don't mean every man all the time. /s It's not like the younger girls and women are going to see that plastered all over the place, and start to internalize it, because it's ok, right? It's funny when women do things they fear men will do, because it's a reversal. So funny! /s
/r/MensRights22/09/25 06:37 PM
-1

There's no misandry in my post, there are also no blanket statements. If you want to show scientific proof that your claims are right, I'll gladly advocate for not castrating male dogs. And those "cheap vets" you speak of can do much more for more animals than I can, so I kind of have to rely on them.
/r/MensRights18/09/25 06:01 PM
1

There are other benefits (to everyone except the dog) to castration. It can calm aggression and stop them from spraying.
/r/MensRights18/09/25 04:09 PM
5

Use nuke, return to monke.
/r/MensRights18/09/25 04:08 PM
105

She initially faced 624. Wisconsin's DoC wanted 24-32 while the ADA wanted 100. When deciding the sentence, the judge said Nelson-Koch’s impact on the victim and his family was a major factor. However, he also said that her purported character was a mitigating factor and that a person with her educational and employment history isn’t “someone who normally would be in the criminal justice system facing 600 years in prison.” On the other hand, Skiles completely disagreed. According to the police d…
/r/PussyPassDenied12/09/25 08:40 PM
1

TL;DR: don't listen to people on the internet about dating. Advice on how to improve yourself? Sure. Just check on it first to make sure it's healthy. So, the first thing you need to do is work on your self-image. The second is to stop worrying about what they think about required reading. The third, find a hobby or three, and make sure at least one is active. Make sure you're exercising other ways too, to prevent uneven muscles. Also, it's ok to try out different hobbies, but do things you actu…
/r/MensRights11/09/25 09:01 PM
6

Yeah, it would probably get scrapped pretty quickly because it wouldn't agree with the current narrative.
/r/MensRights11/09/25 08:40 PM
3

I remember the "1 out of 4 journalists killed are women" push a while ago. I was like: so, do you just want to send men? Cause there's nothing you're going to be able to do to keep journalists safe if they're out there.
/r/MensRights11/09/25 01:52 PM
39

I mean, male already translates to disposable throughout pretty much the entire world. They speedran "innocent until proven guilty" to "if you're a male, guilty until proven innocent, and then many will still think you did it, and you may still suffer for it".
/r/MensRights11/09/25 01:46 PM
50

OK, so what happens when gangs start sending their women to commit crimes like theft, Grand Theft auto, murder, etc? bUt WoMeN dOn'T cOmMiT cRiMeS! /s
/r/MensRights11/09/25 01:39 PM
2

No problem. You do a lot of good for this community. It's possible that they're just not reading usernames (I know I'm usually guilty of it), but the way they're reacting to everything is weird. It almost like it's a fake thing being put up to make men look bad. If anyone says anything negative, they go off. Then they have accounts coming in with one-liners like: "It was the best choice I ever made and changed my life!". I'm glad you take no offense from them, but this is probably like tepid wat…
/r/MensRights10/09/25 06:35 PM
3

It is you who whines like a baby at anything proactive being done. Are you REALLY saying that /u/TheTinMenBlog whines like a baby at anything proactive being done? Are you fucking kidding me? They spread massive amounts of awareness with sources. You're getting defensive and either doubling-down or deflecting, instead of either trying to prove you're not lying or even just saying people have the right to think what they want, but ask them to check it out. If you can look at those two paragraphs …
/r/MensRights10/09/25 05:40 PM
7

Just guessing here, but I think they mean some kind of collapse or apocalypse that will make survival of the fittest relevant again. Basically, something will happen to make the weak and stupid die off, and only the strong and/or smart will survive. Then society will rebuild itself with a bit of a jumpstart and hopefully better handling of power.
/r/MensRights04/09/25 04:01 PM
31

And she even posted that they were very kind to her and it was a nice interaction. How DARE those male officers! (/s)
/r/MensRights02/09/25 08:19 PM
1

It would definitely be an interesting forum to sit in while the details were hammered out!
/r/MensRights02/09/25 05:39 PM
4

If I understand correctly, you're saying that if you defend yourself and attack back, you wouldn't be able to press charges? If that's the way you mean it, I wouldn't agree with it that way. If it's agreed upon before the combat, then I agree. But in a surprise attack, the victim should be able to fight back and press charges. Then you get the grey area of what constitutes agreement. But honestly, I think it could be worked out. And in this day and age of cell phones, I think getting proof of ag…
/r/MensRights02/09/25 03:36 PM
11

I doubt women are seen as children anymore. WAWE is still in effect in most places. I have seen it slipping a little bit in some place. Since a lot more women are being shown to be unreasonable/instigators, more people are slowly having the scales removed from their eyes.
/r/MensRights02/09/25 03:31 PM
5

Or Jennifer Roberson's Sword Dancer saga and book covers.
/r/MensRights23/08/25 07:04 PM
1

They'd call him what he is, a psycho. The WAWE in full force.
/r/MensRights20/08/25 03:18 PM
25

Man does something bad to woman's car: OMG he's a psycho, imprison him for life! He's dangerous to all women! Woman does something bad to man's car: Lol, he deserved it. My personal take: all those people saying she's smiling means he deserved it need a hard lesson in the signs of psychopathy. Because the more I read, the more I thought: she's literally psycho. Now, I'm not qualified to diagnose. Not by any means. But I am qualified to judge things as I see them (as are all people), and she's a …
/r/MensRights19/08/25 06:45 PM
8

In France, a paternity test has to be court ordered. There is no other legal way to get one. There are DNA tests that can be ordered by medical personnel, but it has to be necessary to treat a patient (and I don't know if they're allowed to share the results).
/r/MensRights09/08/25 12:22 PM
16

They couldn't properly tell you anything, because they are just being bullies for the women. It's called "violence by proxy". They think you would not be intimidated by them bullying you directly, so they sent people they thought you would be intimidated by. I would highly suggest, if it's legal in your area, to get a voice-activated recording pen. It will help if they accuse you of saying anything. In fact, I recommend all men look into it. If your location is one-person consent for recording, …
/r/MensRights30/07/25 01:16 PM
4

Happy to help!
/r/MensRights28/07/25 10:49 PM
50

I'm with you. Just linking an article is bullshit, at least give some info. Not everyone wants to click on random links. I copied the first two paragraphs, it kind of sums it up: Men are neck deep in a loneliness epidemic, much of which has to do with male spaces disappearing or no longer being frequented as often as they were in the past. The workplace, churches, social clubs, and bars are no longer places where men gather to casually socialize and build friendships. And even if they do congreg…
/r/MensRights28/07/25 07:39 PM
3

Things started going to shit when they banned the incel subreddit. I have seen a few complaints from some women after FDS was basically shut down and they went to podcasts, too. If you don't give the lowest denominator a free space, they'll take over other spaces.
/r/MensRights26/07/25 04:45 PM
23

I can say that they do get misogynistic lurkers there. Sometimes they even comment. However. If a misogynist makes a comment that doesn't fully fall in line with their thinking, or if someone (or a bot) finds out the commenter is not a woman, the consequences are swift. The person would be banned, and the comment removed. I've seen actual women get their comments removed because they didn't fall in line with the thread-think.
/r/MensRights25/07/25 12:43 PM
74

Just like that one place that had an article talking about objectifying women in the Olympics and how wrong it is, then also having an article talking about Olympic men's bulges.
/r/MensRights17/07/25 01:59 PM
40

Please. Proper journalism takes effort and skill. Half of these "journalists" would probably get fired if they had to go to proper journalism. And to be clear, I'm referring to men and women. They're all capable of drivel.
/r/MensRights17/07/25 01:58 PM
13

I mean, that's part of human nature. How many men got up in arms about the shitty Gillette commercial where it was telling men that they suck, and need to police each other? I think women absolutely should get up in arms about this. I don't care if it's because they find it insulting, or it hurts their ego. Men and boys should not be responsible for policing women's actions, and women and girls should not be responsible for policing men's. Men should not have to police other men, just like women…
/r/MensRights11/07/25 09:37 PM
4

I have no idea why you're being downvoted. You qualify that you're anti-natalist, which while unnecessary (imo), isn't a bad thing in-and-of itself. Then you say something completely reasonable about partnering with someone with mutual respect. Again, nothing bad. You don't berate people for their choices, you're not pushing your beliefs on others, and you're not turning it into something it's not.
/r/MensRights10/07/25 04:41 PM
17

No, we're downvoting because they are brushing off valid concerns. What's sad is that you're jumping to (incorrect) conclusions, and defending the brushing off of valid concerns.
/r/MensRights05/07/25 03:48 PM
13

You absolutely read it incorrectly if you think an actual question is a statement. They are saying: "Men are doing more housework. Are women doing more yard/garage work?" The statement equivalent, is that it's a backhanded way of saying that men are stepping up inside the house, but women are not stepping up outside the house.
/r/MensRights04/07/25 01:52 PM
34

How was the r/incels subreddit looked at, it has been banned for 7 years?
/r/MensRights26/06/25 01:08 PM
10

It's rarely called rape when a woman does it, regardless of country.
/r/PussyPassDenied26/06/25 12:03 AM
15

Don't forget the age gaps of older women and younger men being perfectly fine. 45w>20m? You go girl, get that young dick! 45m>20w? Omg, you fucking creep! you groomed her and are abusing her! I would say they can't have it both ways, but, feminism wouldn't have any standards if they weren't double.
/r/MensRights25/06/25 01:15 PM
4

Oh no! A whole 4 years! I've been noticing a trend where people who care about the age gap are getting more and more tight about it. When I was growing up, a 4 year age gap didn't really matter. It wasn't uncommon for a high school senior to date a freshman. I'm not saying it was necessarily a good thing/there were good intentions, but it wasn't usually a big deal. For adults, a 12+ year age gap wasn't usually a big deal. Especially if the younger person was in their mid 20's+. But some people I…
/r/MensRights25/06/25 01:11 PM
8

The point would be to get health info, but still hide paternity info.
/r/MensRights23/06/25 10:58 PM
20

They would probably just make the law that paternity cannot be revealed/the info gets sealed.
/r/MensRights23/06/25 10:51 PM
26

The worst thing to happen to this sub was the incel subreddit getting banned.
/r/MensRights21/06/25 12:09 PM
5

I think the word you meant was drivel?
/r/MensRights17/06/25 06:28 PM
2

You're better off staying home. I would think the current administration would prove that wrong. I'm not saying the left is any better, but at least they're more honest about it.
/r/MensRights12/06/25 08:17 PM
6

I'm all for them trying. They may even get somewhere with it, and I'm not afraid to have my thoughts challenged. When my views get challenged and shown to be wrong, I can learn from it. I'll change my views, and grow from learning something new. When they're challenged and proven to be right, it just reinforces that I'm right.
/r/MensRights10/06/25 05:09 PM
9

It looks like it got removed. Edit to add: depending on why it got removed, you may just want to link the article and ask what they think.
/r/MensRights10/06/25 05:03 PM
4

Yes.
/r/MensRights10/06/25 04:45 PM
8

She didn't hit the wall, she was the victim of an acid attack. She was a professional model and her ex-boyfriend tried to destroy her. It may not entirely excuse it, but it definitely explains why she values beauty so much. Don't get me wrong, she sounds really out of touch. But I do have empathy for her. She was stabbed, raped, and then attacked with acid causing pretty bad damage and blindness in one eye. I wouldn't wish that on most people.
/r/MensRights07/06/25 01:03 PM
12

I'm pretty sure that's because men will be taking over and doing everything. Women will become a commodity again (like in the Stone Age) so the race can survive. But you'll see traditional gender roles rearing their ugly head with full force. And a lot of people are going to have to follow the new rules, regardless of how they feel about them, if they want to keep living.
/r/MensRights07/06/25 12:55 PM
1

I mean, women settle nowadays when they're used up or don't have better prospects. No reason they wouldn't, and faster, if they had to approach men. Not saying them settling is a good thing, but it would cause more women to take the risk.
/r/MensRights03/06/25 01:03 AM
2

resting heart rate (low indicates general fitness) My resting heart rate is 55bpm. Not because I'm physically fit, but because I had a video game addiction and barely moved from my computer for 7 years. My heart is deconditioned. So far, I've climbed up to good enough condition that I don't go into AFIB for jogging across the street. I know that as a general rule resting heart rate can be a good indicator, but not always.
/r/MensRights03/06/25 12:56 AM
7

I seriously doubt women would get rejected all that often, though it would be more than they have to deal with now. But it would make dating much easier if the women were the ones that have to approach. I know Bumble tried that, and apparently there are enough users there to keep it afloat. But really, it would be nice to have the power of mate selection. But I know it won't happen, at least in my lifetime.
/r/MensRights02/06/25 06:51 PM
3

Unfortunately society has taken "sex sells" to a whole new level.
/r/MensRights02/06/25 04:55 PM
2

Change it to 10'5.
/r/MensRights02/06/25 04:38 PM
6

You know something else that you can change about yourself? Your race. I think you missed a 't in there.
/r/MensRights02/06/25 04:38 PM
4

Or reverse the number if the inches are 6 or greater. I'm 5'9, so I would say I'm 9'5.
/r/MensRights02/06/25 04:37 PM
99

I really wish men would band together and just stop pursuing women. Turn the tables, and make women pursue men. Of course, society would just blame men for women being lonely, but eventually, women probably would pursue men.
/r/MensRights02/06/25 04:35 PM
3

Personally, I wouldn't. But then again, I wouldn't put any money into a dating app. I think it's important to note, though, that I'm almost 50. While I would use a dating app, it wouldn't be my primary search tool.
/r/MensRights02/06/25 04:33 PM
2

Hopefully it's not. A lot of those things are symptoms of personality disorders, which are less common than "normal" personality traits. Of course, many people may have one or two of those symptoms without being diagnosable, just like many people share at least one or two general personality traits with some of the best and worst people in history. If you're mainly finding potential partners that have these personality traits, you're either in the wrong place, or it's something with you. I'm not…
/r/MensRights02/06/25 02:17 PM
3

I agree that housing prices are out of control. But how much your apartment costs vs a mortgage has a huge amount of variables to it. For example, a studio apartment in NYC can pretty easily be more expensive than my mortgage in a moderate-sized tourist city. If I'm not mistaken, location is one of the biggest factors in housing cost.
/r/MensRights31/05/25 07:27 PM
10

a housing market where rent is more expensive than a mortgage Of course it is. Rent has to pay the mortgage on the property, as well as provide cash for repairs, and hopefully some profit. If I had a rental property and rented it for less than the mortgage, I would be paying for someone to live in my property.
/r/MensRights31/05/25 07:10 PM
6

I learned something new today, and I really appreciate it. Thanks! That's super interesting!
/r/MensRights31/05/25 02:13 PM
28

I find your lack of punctuation disturbing. Well, not really, since you're being pretty judgy and way over the top. Their capitalization isn't insane. It's interesting how Ukrainian isn't capitalized like it should be, but EU is. Also, by should be capitalized since it's the first word of the sentence. But overall, a little off, but not insane.
/r/MensRights30/05/25 06:27 PM
4

It's possible that that's what's going on. However, when you appeal, it's supposed to go to an actual person for review. And an actual person said that I was threatening violence or physical harm.
/r/MensRights28/05/25 03:40 PM
9

I've noticed Reddit has been getting more aggressive with their censoring. I got a warning just for saying "if I had fuck you money, I would make their life hell". I appealed, and they said the warning stands. I've seen other comments that actually do refer to committing I've seen a lot more "[ Removed by Reddit ]" comments recently, as well. Not sure why, but the admins are going nuts with it.
/r/MensRights28/05/25 01:51 PM
48

Because a woman did it. It wasn't grooming. If anything, it was his fault for being so charming. /s
/r/MensRights26/05/25 08:26 PM
4

First and foremost, I completely support your position. You should not be shamed, cajoled, or pushed to date someone you don't want to. And it's ok to have standards. If body composition is important to you, then hold that standard. Keep that spine nice and shiny (I know I'm singing to the choir, but I hope some encouragement may help). If you want people to leave you alone about it more, maybe ask them what type of lifestyle the person has. Tell whoever that you're incredibly active, and want s…
/r/MensRights28/04/25 08:12 PM
1

Race has nothing to do with it. Then my comment doesn't apply to you. The costume implies racism, and my comment implicitly says "..."scared" of cities when it's really just racism."
/r/MensRights25/04/25 12:06 PM
46

I'm a fat dude, but someone saying they failed high school PE seems like a much more unfuckable trait than someone being concerned for their physical wellbeing, even if it is overboard a little. She sounds like she's grasping for attention. That costume is obviously a dig at conservative country-folk who are "scared" of cities when it's really just racism. But of course, it has to be about gender, right? Big (literally) strong (figuratively) woman isn't scared to walk around NYC at 3am, so no on…
/r/MensRights20/04/25 05:36 PM
167

Because just by saying that "they need more men" in anything goes against the narrative of "men bad", and "men aren't needed in society". But they're starting to figure out, just a little, that things are fucked up. Hopefully, they'll actually see that the problem they have getting men into these positions is because of how men are treated in those positions.
/r/MensRights03/04/25 12:05 PM
13

It makes me wonder how many of the intimate partner deaths were from hetero- vs. homo- relationships. It's already been shown that lesbian relationships have the highest rate of DV, I wonder how that translates to deaths.
/r/MensRights02/04/25 01:52 PM
7

I completely agree with you, though I find it kind of funny that I know a couple of teens who would rather rent than own. They don't want to deal with the issues of home ownership. Then again, they didn't want to learn how to take care of a car, either (oil/tire change, checking fluids, feeling changes). Some of that will probably change, though. At least I hope it does, one of them is my kid :p.
/r/MensRights23/03/25 11:18 AM
22

I'm sorry that happened to you, bro. It wasn't your fault, and it's still not your fault. Your feelings are valid, no matter what anyone else says. I hope you're able to get any help you may need.
/r/MensRights20/03/25 07:21 PM
5

I'm in the US, not using a VPN, and it still said Access Denied for me.
/r/PussyPassDenied17/03/25 01:08 PM
19

Per capita? Yes. By raw numbers? Possibly, but the US is the 3rd most populous country in the world.
/r/PussyPassDenied15/03/25 01:36 PM
10

All you're doing is driving traffic to her. In this day and age, "there's no such thing as bad press" is more relevant than ever. Outrage drives clicks, that's why there's so much rage bait. People want to voice their anger at who/whatever made them angry, and it creates more clicks and more money. People as a whole need to stop feeding them. Don't post the stuff, don't click on it. Ignore the bad actors. If we starve them of attention for bad behavior, they'll stop behaving badly at some point.…
/r/PussyPassDenied15/03/25 01:29 PM
4

I was wondering what would happen if she tried that with a cassowary or emu egg.
/r/PussyPassDenied15/03/25 01:26 PM
45

Too many people are too quick to blame their country as a whole for the shitty people in it. A VAST majority of Americans would never even dream of doing something so stupid. We need to start throwing the bad apples out of the bunch instead of letting them ruin it. And every country has it's shitty tourists.
/r/PussyPassDenied15/03/25 01:24 PM
1

Why did you even talk to her that much? You should have said bye and blocked her as soon as she better to be a mother to a girl than a boy. After that lead in, did you really expect something different? What the fuck is with all these guys tolerating a boatload of misandry before they cut it off? Get some self respect!
/r/MensRights12/03/25 11:25 PM
9

But why are women favored then? Race isn't near the dividing factor it used to be. The elites need to keep the masses divided, so they can remain elites. Cue up the next dividing topic: gender. It's even better than race, because it does affect everyone. You don't have female or male only towns/cities (except that one in Mexico, I think it is, and they have men there during the day). With race, some people only saw other races through the media. With gender, it's everywhere. That's why it contin…
/r/MensRights11/03/25 04:31 PM
15

Maybe you should start gender-reversing anything that is gendered, and see how you feel. It can be the first step in understanding actual equality. Would it be ok for a man to show porn of himself with a woman in her place of business? Does it outrage you to think about it? If your answers are no and yes, respectively, then look at your comment again and understand that your lack of outrage is called misandry.
/r/PussyPassDenied09/03/25 05:57 PM
11

That's not PPD.
/r/PussyPassDenied06/03/25 09:26 PM
12

Tell him to stop mansplaining.
/r/MensRights06/03/25 01:28 PM
1

In other words: 98% of detained youth are boys, girls most effected.
/r/MensRights05/03/25 09:26 PM
1

First time I've seen it. Reposts aren't always bad.
/r/MensRights05/03/25 09:25 PM
1

That's pretty awesome, I'm glad you're in a career that you love! I do wish people would chill with looking down at people in the trades. It's possible to make a lot of money there, if that's what people want to call success. But too many people are stuck with "college=more money".
/r/MensRights04/03/25 12:51 PM
13

I completely agree. There've been multiple studies that show it's false. But, they never gain traction.
/r/MensRights04/03/25 12:59 AM
52

There are people who truly enjoy and seek out blue collar jobs. It's not always people who can't get into college, or do well in classroom scenarios. My brother is a plumber. He started out in high school just cleaning the shop and keeping it stocked. He listened and paid attention, and learned about different things, so some of the guys would take him on jobs. Now he owns 2 shops and holds a city government office. Also, which blue collar jobs are in danger because of automation and AI? I'm not…
/r/MensRights03/03/25 08:31 PM
65

Please. They'll still tout it the same way until enough people realize that it's not true. They'll suppress it as much as they can, so they can keep that facet of victimhood. Once too many people start calling them out, that's when it won't matter anymore.
/r/MensRights03/03/25 02:24 PM
4

while women who openly practice their misandry get a slap on the wrist or get little to no consequences at all. praised. FTFY
/r/MensRights01/03/25 07:33 PM
6

"Misandry kills as well. Unfortunately, abuse and violence by women is so underreported, under-investigated, under-punished, and swept under the rug that people don't truly see how bad violence by women really is. Also, violence-by-proxy is used by many women, so they can avoid responsibility. In the past, societal gender roles and rules made it easy for women to get away with, and now the feminist movement has taken on that mantle to suppress male victimhood."
/r/MensRights28/02/25 04:34 PM
1

Sorry, I meant that reply for a different thread. Bit of a r/lostredditors moment, there. Your first reply to me is absolutely correct.
/r/MensRights27/02/25 08:23 PM
5

If in the US, that's a big fat lawsuit.
/r/MensRights27/02/25 05:57 PM
70

has the UK become hostile against blokes (Emphasis mine.) Become? No. It's been hostile to men for at least a decade, probably much longer (I don't know for sure, I don't follow UK politics). Australia is pretty bad for it, as well.
/r/MensRights27/02/25 12:12 PM
26

It's the UK. It's ok to discriminate against men there, as long as no women are affected. You could take a discrimination case to the courts, but they'll laugh as soon as they see the victim is a man.
/r/MensRights27/02/25 12:08 PM
21

I'm like why? Because they wanted to elicit deeper emotions. If the victim was a male, people wouldn't get as deeply outraged, or as deeply horrified. Also, there's a chance more people would watch it because of a female victim. So yeah, probably marketing, as well.
/r/MensRights24/02/25 10:14 PM
9

If you want to know why: internet points. Likes, subscribes, views, whatever it is they're going for. The world is so gynocentric right now, that anything a woman does better than a man is overly celebrated. They post it for the attention they get from it. And there's definitely a double standard going on. If a man posted the same about a woman, as you said, they would be hated on. There's also the double-edged sword of "you got beat up by a girl" vs. "you beat a girl up". They tell you that you…
/r/MensRights15/02/25 04:30 PM
2

I don't know, it may come up. A lot of people want the US to be a fundamental Christian country. It's funny how they hate Muslim countries, but it's ok for their religion to rule. They hypocrisy is frightening. I think a revolution may come up, but it's going to be a while and take a lot more stupidity. If the US was the size of France, I think we would have revolted already.
/r/MensRights15/02/25 01:45 PM
3

That's why I said "most cases", so it's not a blanket that covers everything. I do know about nocturnal emissions. The whole thing is just ridiculous, in my opinion.
/r/MensRights15/02/25 01:38 PM
11

It's releasing an egg without intent to fertilize. The difference is, in most cases, releasing sperm is intentional rather than a passive bodily function. Edit to add: I'm not saying it's right, just stating what it is.
/r/MensRights15/02/25 01:25 PM
49

Unfortunately, in my experience, family courts don't care about perjury that much/often. They're supposed to be deciding the outcomes of kids' lives, how the fuck can they gloss over a parent lying on the stand? If they're lying there, they'll lie in other places.
/r/MensRights12/02/25 10:45 PM
14

It's not always the father that makes that choice.
/r/MensRights09/02/25 04:12 PM
20

Honestly, in this case, I'm ok with her just filming. If she interfered, they could arrest her, too. Then she goes to jail while he still goes to war. They both lose. Another point to consider is that if she had interfered and been arrested, that video probably would have never made it out of her phone. Lastly, I know if I was in that situation, I would rather her do exactly what she did. I wouldn't want her to go to jail, no point in both of us suffering by imprisonment. If she's free, she may …
/r/MensRights09/02/25 12:07 AM
13

Allegedly! That's ignorant!
/r/MensRights07/02/25 02:57 PM
10

I know it's not much, but I gave my son and daughter talks at the same time. And I would tell them both how to treat men and women, and make sure they knew that relationships aren't supposed to be one-sided.
/r/MensRights07/02/25 12:52 AM
6

or that it effects men at all. It does. Men are the ones these "soft girls" want to have pay for everything. While I will say the men would be using the younger women for their youth/beauty/body (of course emotions could come into play), these women want to use men for money. And they're trying to paint it in a light that makes it seem like everyone should do it. It also points to how women are still trying to keep men in the "protector/provider" pigeonhole, and can actually show a little insigh…
/r/MensRights07/02/25 12:16 AM
3

From a purely financial standpoint, that makes a lot of sense. Life insurance can be expensive, and there's not really a point to having a higher policy on the person who doesn't contribute as much financially.
/r/MensRights07/02/25 12:11 AM
3

From my view point, no one needs to apologize for having been a feminist. It's very easy to fall into it, when everything people hear is about how it's for equality. Just like some people believe that 8 spiders a year are swallowed while sleeping, it's misinformation that's out there that gets believed. It doesn't make you a bad person.
/r/MensRights06/02/25 01:26 PM
2

But also please be aware that some women are just born with it & no matter what they wear some cleavage is visible. That's incredibly false. Just because a huge majority of women you come in contact with or see show cleavage, doesn't mean it's impossible to hide. They just don't want to enough to wear the clothes that would hide it. Another option to women who advertise it, they may not think it's their best or only asset, but they may understand that sex sells. So it's not their best or only, b…
/r/MensRights04/02/25 04:03 PM
14

It's called the "Women are Wonderful" effect.
/r/MensRights03/02/25 05:35 PM
17

You have to let people handle it how they can. It's a lot of money and time to try to get her for false accusation, and even if successful, if she doesn't have money OP can't get money. Sure, she'll have a judgement over her for her whole life, but it won't give OP the time and money back. Honestly, for women, all they have to do is find a man to take care of them so they don't have to work. They can live a nice life even owing millions like that, and if they don't make money, they can't start p…
/r/MensRights31/01/25 05:48 PM
2

If they know who the father is, they're supposed to. But I personally know at least 1 person who honestly didn't know who the father was. It took a while, but they finally allowed her to apply without putting anyone down. If the state came after someone misidentified, they should be able to clear it up by a paternity test. Though how much it may cost them before it's cleared, I don't know.
/r/MensRights27/01/25 09:36 PM
28

Because it's the state that would "suffer" if the men didn't. It's one of the reasons they won't make paternity tests mandatory at birth. If she doesn't know (or refuses to say) who the real father is, she will probably qualify for a lot of social assistance programs. The state doesn't want to do that if they can put some guy on the hook for it.
/r/MensRights27/01/25 01:14 PM
0

They didn't even read the article, so that should say something. It specifies that the victim's mother has custody of the infant.
/r/PussyPassDenied20/01/25 01:57 PM
16

They are rare but exist in society Are you saying female predators are rare? Cause they're not. They're all over the place. But boys get told they're lucky, when they report it. And adult men get laughed at or told to shut up, they got lucky, when they report it. The entire reason people think female predators are rare, is the fact that they're underreported and under-prosecuted.
/r/MensRights16/01/25 11:28 PM
1

I know you're not seeking legal advice, but the best things you can do are: 1.) delete this post 2.) delete any other social media post about this case, and don't make any new ones 3.) talk to your lawyer I know it's not what you want to hear, but if you're guilty, do the minimum that you can and move on. If you're not, then follow the advice of your lawyer. Maybe get a second opinion on the case if you need to. But keep all of it out of cyberspace.
/r/MensRights12/01/25 04:12 PM
66

Men are considered expendable. Been that way since the dawn of time. Maybe in a couple thousand years, if humanity survives that long, society will figure out that men deserve to be protected, too.
/r/MensRights10/01/25 02:01 PM
5

I had thought about taking a "gender studies" class to see what kind of rhetoric they were spewing. I spoke to a few people in this sub who had, and I was glad I didn't sign up. I don't know if I would have made it through the class. I would have to argue every point that was obviously wrong, and it would not be good for anyone.
/r/MensRights07/01/25 01:15 AM
2

I believe that because the wording allows for that interpretation. The only other things I've said here are about the CDC definition, which I stated doesn't allow for made-to-penetrate to count as rape.
/r/MensRights06/01/25 02:16 PM
2

but yet again CDC, FBI or Penal Codes only recognize rape as penetration by penis That's not true in all cases. According to the FBI, the definition is: Penetration, no matter how slight, of the vagina or anus with any body part or object, or oral penetration by a sex organ of another person, without the consent of the victim. The CDC differentiates rape and forced-to-penetrate, which is ridiculous. The AI Overview response to "CDC definition of rape" is: any completed or attempted unwanted pene…
/r/MensRights05/01/25 07:02 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter