TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

quasimotor Archive

View 10 posts and 196 comments by quasimotor on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
9

Patriarchy hurts men too! /s
/r/MensRights28/02/19 08:44 PM
13

Wait. You don't want to subsidize this? Bigot!
/r/PussyPassDenied31/07/17 11:14 AM
5

Our whole society has "you gay nigga" cancer now.
/r/PussyPassDenied31/07/17 11:13 AM
3

They have higher T levels than the average white male. Really makes you think...
/r/PussyPassDenied31/07/17 11:09 AM
23

You gay.
/r/PussyPassDenied31/07/17 11:08 AM
2

Hahaha! Nice one.
/r/MensRights07/07/16 11:07 AM
8

Bring back trial by combat!
/r/MensRights06/07/16 09:02 PM
9

Here's a few links for anyone interested in delving into this perspective. http://www.socialmatter.net http://socialpathology.blogspot.com/?m=1 https://americanmorals.wordpress.com
/r/TheRedPill04/06/16 01:59 PM
5

That was sublime. Thank you.
/r/TheRedPill03/06/16 03:59 AM
18

Once we are free from fear of being called "racists" we can accomplish anything.
/r/TheRedPill03/06/16 03:56 AM
1

Tap on the sub name at the top, then tap the up arrow icon in the center of your bottom nav. You'll see the option to "show sidebar".
/r/MensRights04/09/14 05:10 PM
20

"Empowered"
/r/MensRights19/04/13 12:39 AM
1

Oooh! Scandalous! Gimme more examples.
/r/MensRights09/03/13 02:02 AM
1

I can't believe this is getting downvoted. Well said. And refreshing to hear someone articulate how the problem goes beyond feminism. We spend so much time here arguing over feminism we often don't get down to the deeper issues. Perhaps it could be because fighting feminism is comparatively easy. Men were getting a raw deal long before feminism came along and the only way men will start to be treated like human beings as opposed to exclusively "human sex machines"/"human shields"/"walking ATMs" …
/r/MensRights21/02/13 04:27 AM
11

Excellent points. Men are actually really emotional (duh!) and do act on emotion. We just don't think about men's emotions as emotions. Wanna see some emotional men? Go to any sporting event. It's not rationality that causes that fandom. Men just get associated with different emotions, negative emotions, or maybe it's the other way around.
/r/MensRights21/02/13 04:08 AM
1

Prevent completely is not what you said. Now you're changing goalposts. This is pointless.
/r/MensRights20/02/13 11:45 AM
1

You just contradicted yourself in the same comment. Both statements are true. (Including the one that said: "If the accuser faces punishment, they're a lot less likely to make a false accusation.") I don't think the threat of punishment is enough to prevent false accusations.
/r/MensRights19/02/13 11:13 PM
1

If the accuser faces punishment, they're a lot less likely to recant a false accusation. If the accuser faces punishment, they're a lot less likely to make a false accusation. FIFY
/r/MensRights19/02/13 10:29 PM
5

Nope, not even a single one of them, which is why I make no judgements of him or his character in any way. Perhaps this is why you're so confused about how UofT protesters misrepresented Dr. Warren Farrell's words. I did answer your question. I'll quote myself: The only thing at issue is whether the quotes are a misrepresentation of the author's viewpoint. Have feminists had their words taken out of context and misrepresented? Yes. And when that happens, is it wrong? Yes. It's unfortunate. And u…
/r/MensRights18/02/13 09:57 PM
2

I feel like I need more "context" for this one. /s
/r/MensRights18/02/13 09:32 PM
6

Feminists would disagree. And they'd be wrong. Not all opinions are equally valid. Have you read all of these articles and the authors background work to ensure that these women are bigots? Do I have to read all of them to know for sure? I wasn't speaking about all the other authors in the list either, only Bev Jo. And I can tell you I read enough to satisfy my doubts. She's a bigot. Have you read all of Warren Farrell's books? Maybe at the very end of his last book he'll write "I hate all women…
/r/MensRights18/02/13 09:23 PM
1

It was not an analogy. Women were property, and so were children. It's not that they were property because men were responsible for them either. I was simply attempting to show the other side of the coin- when this was true for women, this was true for men. Furthermore, the idea of people as property has only recently fallen out of fashion. So when women and children were property of men, so too were men property of others as slaves etc. We're just not getting the whole picture when we talk abou…
/r/MensRights18/02/13 09:13 PM
8

What is the difference between us taking these quotes out of context and feminists taking Warren Farrell out of context in exact the same way? I'd bet you're asking this rhetorically, but if you'd like my answer, here goes: Warren Farrell is not a bigot. In order to "prove" he's a misogynist you have to cherry pick quotes. Bev Jo, for example, (the author of the above quoted text) is an open bigot toward men. She makes no bones about it. Did you read the article he linked to- "The Crimes of Mank…
/r/MensRights18/02/13 09:00 PM
1

Well, that explains a lot.
/r/MensRights18/02/13 07:23 PM
0

A principle of statutory interpretation should not be used as rule of common speech interpretation, or more so, political speeches. I'm talking about prevailing social attitudes, not law. But whatever… And "violence against adults is ok". When? War. (Fought mostly by men, toward whom violence is acceptable.) And something for you to think. In many countries, is ok to phisically punish a children who done something wrong, but it is forbidden to do the same against an adult. ...And in many countri…
/r/MensRights18/02/13 02:55 PM
1

I'm looking for specific examples, such as: "Women were property." - and men had the responsibility for that highly valued property. If a woman committed a crime, her husband would be held accountable. (Women are intrinsically valuable, men's value is derived from protecting and providing for women.) "Women couldn't even vote until 1920." - Well, not exactly, but most men couldn't vote until 1850 when property/tax requirements were lifted. (Classic feminist apex fallacy) "A man could force his w…
/r/MensRights18/02/13 02:30 PM
2

Hey everyone but Swedish, English, American or British people! (BTW English people are British, anyway…) There is one universal truth, applicable to all countries, cultures and communities: my car is blue??? Try again. It means that if I say that violence against children is unaccetable, then I am saying that violence adults its ok? Yes you are. Expressio unius est exclusio alterius. The expression of one thing is the exclusion of another. And you'd be right! Violence against adults is ok ("ok" …
/r/MensRights18/02/13 01:23 PM
3

I don't think people read past the first paragraph of what you said, hence the down votes. I'd particularly liked this though To many people, the very notion of "violence against men" is nonsensical. It's like talking about "violence against screwdrivers."
/r/MensRights18/02/13 01:07 PM
2

If we apply your logic to that statement we can derive: There is one universal truth, applicable to all countries, cultures and communities: violence against animals is acceptable, excusable, and tolerable. Good point. I'd say that pretty much holds true. Violence against animals is perfectly acceptable for the most part. Unless you're talking with a vegan. Expressio unius est exclusio alterius. The expression of one thing is the exclusion of another.
/r/MensRights18/02/13 01:03 PM
11

Challenging the notion of "The Historical Oppression of Women" gets some serious pushback from otherwise reasonable people. It's so deeply ingrained. They might agree that things are unequal now between men and women, but they look at that as a modern phenomenon and completely buy into the "historical oppression of women". Certainly, the treatment of women in certain historical/cultural contexts could objectively be deemed better/worse than now, but the idea that somehow women were always unifor…
/r/MensRights17/02/13 09:50 PM
5

Lately the feminist/extreme couponing movement has been in an uproar about how discontinuing Saturday mail will disproportionately affect female coupon collectors. I always knew the U.S. Mail was sexist.
/r/MensRights17/02/13 09:36 PM
2

This story has made the Front Page!
/r/MensRights17/02/13 02:18 PM
3

Literally strawman.
/r/MensRights14/02/13 03:23 AM
3

Secretly = without involving cheating spouse and biased family courts.
/r/MensRights14/02/13 03:21 AM
6

The intent of law and its impact are two different things. While the intent may not be discrimination, the impact may be just that. If the impact of a law is discriminatory, it's a discriminatory law.
/r/MensRights14/02/13 03:06 AM
1

Interesting question. I would love to see a study done on that. Yet while they may not costitute a majority there are now more elected officials who are women than ever before.
/r/MensRights13/02/13 12:45 PM
5

Not always subtle, lol. I was thinking more along the lines of relational aggression. Great example though. It's pretty convenient to ignore all the women in the government too. And spending the power... And educational access...
/r/MensRights12/02/13 11:34 PM
6

Watched video, got dumber. Having listened to the Gweek podcast linked here earlier has opened my eyes to how incredibly cynical these hate/click-mongers really are. I just didn't know they were that dumb. It would be funny if people weren't actually reading them.
/r/MensRights12/02/13 09:42 PM
12

They assert that women have no power And therein lies the central fallacy of feminist theory. They've defined power as something only a man can have, ignoring any manner of ways women have always (perhaps more subtlety) influenced society. They assert that women have no power If that statement were attributed to an MHRA, it would be deemed sexist. Because it is.
/r/MensRights12/02/13 08:21 PM
5

There's nothing wrong with "objectification" I think its natural, but it can be problematic. Especially when somehow its considered more problematic when women are objectified, and men's objectification remains invisible. It's a similar to how partner violence is perceived. This just points out the double standard. do we really need to buy into every feminist sound-byte just to prove that we too are oppressed Thank you. We would do well to develop our own vocabulary of gender discourse. "Objecti…
/r/MensRights12/02/13 07:04 PM
3

Emergency crews responding to the father's 911 call found Flores' pants and underwear pulled down on his lifeless body. The girl was examined at a hospital, and Lavaca County District Attorney Heather McMinn said forensic evidence and witness accounts corroborated the father's story that his daughter was being sexually molested. He had the right (and responsibility) to use deadly force to stop a sexual assault. Case closed.
/r/MensRights12/02/13 06:47 PM
5

You're just mad because they are challenging your privilege. /s
/r/MensRights12/02/13 06:29 PM
2

It's a wonder that kind of stuff doesn't happen more. And I'm not sure it's a good idea to point this out. They might catch on...
/r/MensRights12/02/13 06:22 PM
2

Source, for the poor?
/r/MensRights12/02/13 06:16 PM
3

Pretty much sums it up.
/r/MensRights12/02/13 03:59 PM
2

Gynocentrism.
/r/MensRights09/02/13 06:00 PM
4

To paraphrase Warren Farrell: Our need to believe women is surpassed only by our need to believe women are innocent. So we believe when they say they were abused, and disbelieve when they say they were lying about the abuse.
/r/MensRights08/02/13 12:10 PM
9

thousands of years of wrong? Citation needed.
/r/MensRights06/02/13 03:37 AM
1

thanks for this one!
/r/MensRights04/02/13 11:42 PM
1

I think this is next on my reading list. I've really enjoyed her columns. Looking forward to getting my hands on this one.
/r/MensRights04/02/13 02:16 PM
2

Its just that it was never pushed on them. I guess if you knew their parents you'd see the irony. When you're told its all a "social construct" long enough you start to believe it. Spoiler alert: its not.
/r/MensRights04/02/13 05:53 AM
1

Oh. That GID.
/r/MensRights04/02/13 03:05 AM
13

It's isolating. There's a reason these topics are taboo. You're suddenly much harder to manipulate. Im lucky enough to have an amazing wife who's sympathetic to the MRM. Id be in trouble otherwise. Raising my kids has gotten interesting too. As they both learn their respective gender roles am at a loss. I simply try and encourage them in whatever they do. He plays shootem up. And she plays princess. They're so gendertypical its silly. It's clearly got some deep biological roots because my wife a…
/r/MensRights03/02/13 10:17 PM
0

When it comes to getting out our message, we need to focus on reaching men. If we can't convince men, appealing to feminists is irrelevant. Talk to your dads, brothers,uncles, sons, nephews, etc. You'll find there's plenty of resistance there. Its hard to confront your own disposability. As long as men keep taking the hero bribe, and viewing each other as competitors for the ultimate prize of female attention and approval, we'll get nowhere.
/r/MensRights03/02/13 09:59 PM
1

GID? gastrointestinal disorder?
/r/MensRights03/02/13 09:33 PM
2

I've noticed none of these (including Myth of Male Power) are available at my local library. Edit: A search for "feminism" results in 184 titles.
/r/MensRights03/02/13 07:40 PM
3

Feminism's hey-day Wishful thinking maybe. But it had gained a certain mainstream appeal. Everyone was calling themselves a feminist then. Although, it is certainly more institutionally entrenched today. However I would say today is NOT the heyday of feminism, precisely because of us, the MRM! We are at long last mounting a challenge to their monopoly of the gender monolog!
/r/MensRights03/02/13 07:28 PM
0

Quick question. Unrelated. How many reddit accounts do you have? jimmyzinn23232, jimmyzinn6, jimmyzinn77x, jimmyzinn121212 Are there more? Edit: And why are three of them less than three days old?
/r/MensRights03/02/13 06:29 PM
32

Not a big fan of this having "offensive" stuff taken down. Don't like it when feminists do it, and I'm not going to start to like it when MRAs or whoever else does it. Agreed. But... Don't like it? Don't play it. I don't think that's enough. Simply because this is a perfect opportunity to draw attention to the double standard applied to partner violence. If pointing that out causes it to get banned, so be it. If it starts a wider discussion that causes people to recognize their own cognitive dis…
/r/MensRights03/02/13 05:55 PM
8

Wow! The stats for minority men are particularly appalling. Black women are nearly twice as likely to earn a college degree as black men. At some historically black colleges, the gap is astounding: Fisk is now 64 female; Howard, 67 percent; Clark Atlanta, 75 percent. The economist Andrew M. Sum and his colleagues at the Center for Labor Market Studies at Northeastern University examined the Boston Public Schools and found that for the graduating class of 2007, there were 191 black girls for ever…
/r/MensRights03/02/13 05:37 PM
4

It's right in the side bar for fucks sake. FAQ "5. If r/MR is not anti-female, why are there "Women Behaving Badly" articles? Western societies seem to believe that women are not violent or do not commit crimes. Reduced sentencing for women as compared to men and overwhelming evidence for gender parity in domestic violence with higher police records of male perpetrated domestic violence indicate that there is very much a view that men are "bad" and women are "good". Society accepts that men shou…
/r/MensRights03/02/13 04:41 PM
2

There is no point. I found that out myself. You could've done better, but it wouldn't have mattered. Despite what the other commenters seem to think, I appreciated the link. I think we need to hone our ability to open people's eyes. It's hard. We are challenging some very deeply ingrained aspects of our biological inheritance, for example: male disposability. People are going to resist, but we need to engage them, succeed, fail, and share to improve our ability to get our message out. If the tit…
/r/MensRights03/02/13 04:15 PM
4

By my count he mentioned "white people" once. I personally didn't take exception to that. Now, if you mean he's racist against black people, you might have an argument there.
/r/MensRights03/02/13 03:40 PM
5

The primary victims of male suicide have always been women. ...And the primary victims of boys' fatherlessness have always been the mothers who have to look after their unruly sons. ...And the primary victims of divorce are the women who are oppressed by the alimony they are forced to accept in lieu of getting a job to support themselves. ...And the primary victims of family court are the wives of the lawyers and judges who are so busy working they have little time to spend with them. ...And the…
/r/MensRights03/02/13 06:05 AM
3

He just equated "white people" with the government. Which is not too far off. I can forgive that. Setting aside the white people = government comment, he's making a point that is echoed in many corners of the MRM: the government is incentivizing and subsidizing the bad behavior of women.
/r/MensRights03/02/13 05:27 AM
9

I think we should do more to speak to the struggles of black men as men. The racism is so visible the sexism is almost completely invisible. Black men are being legislated out of the family and into the penitentiary. This guy actually has a number of good points. (And we think we have a message problem!)
/r/MensRights03/02/13 05:21 AM
36

Fucking scary, dude. Or maybe funny if I were in a different mood. I thought this was satire at first.
/r/MensRights03/02/13 04:55 AM
73

Holy Shit. The comments. I couldn't read the whole thing so I skipped to the comments. The comments were worse than I ever could've imagined the OP to be. People actually read this and agreed. Their minds were blown. They were transformed by this schlock. Pure elation. I can't begin to formulate thoughts that y chromosome dumb no walk have elbow dinosaur pete of how not flood why two deaf meter womb...
/r/MensRights03/02/13 04:25 AM
2

Agreed. Part of the problem is that we place all of the responsibility for initiating romantic overtures on men and boys. People underestimate the pressure of that expectation. Women and girls are completely absolved of any responsibility for communicating forthrightly. Their expectation is to play hard to get, send mixed signals, and keep him guessing. Is it any wonder things go wrong once physical intimacy is involved?
/r/MensRights01/02/13 02:56 PM
3

which ironically, is an accurate portrayal of men.
/r/MensRights29/01/13 05:59 PM
2

/sarcasm
/r/MensRights28/01/13 05:58 PM
6

Can we stop bashing feminists? I don't see how this is a men's rights issue /s.
/r/MensRights28/01/13 12:20 PM
2

I'm glad I posted this in r/MRmemes instead, with a title that gave it some context.
/r/MensRights28/01/13 02:08 AM
3

It doesnt make sense until you remember, men = rapists. /s
/r/MensRights27/01/13 02:53 AM
79

Please stop. Not because I don't enjoy it. I do. But this truly belongs in r/tumblrinaction. The funniest fucking subreddit of all time. I found it last night and laughed til i cried multiple times. Enjoy.
/r/MensRights22/01/13 10:21 PM
8

Outcomes certainly do not need to be equal. But if we are serious about encouraging people to move beyond traditional gender roles in occupation, encouraging men to become teachers is the place to start. Why "now more than ever"? Boys. Because boys do need male role models. Fatherlessness is endemic. Boys are struggling in K-12, and men disappearing from colleges and universities. (And this is where our opposition is entrenched and institutionalized.) Most children will go through the first 6-7 …
/r/MensRights22/01/13 10:12 PM
3

Nice guys don't have Reddit accounts Had a rice roll over that one.
/r/MensRights22/01/13 12:14 AM
4

If you are looking for further reading into the flawed study showing the efficacy of MGM in preventing the transmission of AIDS that has been woozled its way into common knowledge, I found this for ya: When bad science kills, or how to spread AIDS by Brian D. Earp.
/r/MensRights21/01/13 07:58 PM
0

I think when JockeVXO said "despicable", he meant "dangerous".
/r/MensRights21/01/13 12:12 AM
3

If you have the time, and you really want to know, read the Myth of Male Power by Dr. Warren Farrell.
/r/MensRights20/01/13 11:09 PM
0

BREAKING NEWS! PROOF OF THE PATRIARCHY!
/r/MensRights20/01/13 11:06 PM
1

Is an MRA - defends a loathsome ideology that demonizes men. Is an MRA - more concerned with female approval than his own dignity. (This belongs in r/MRmemes anyway.) Edit: link
/r/MensRights20/01/13 10:47 PM
7

I don't think anybody minds anti-feminism rants Clearly, some do. This is a constant sticking point around here. IMO, the furtherance of Men's Rights is antifeminism. What MR discussion is there to be had in which feminism is not a legitimate issue? Which MR issue does not find fierce opposition from feminists? If you've got them please bring them up. Let's discuss!
/r/MensRights20/01/13 06:46 PM
11

Thanks, I just peeked in over there. Good stuff! Plenty of what winds up on the front page here would be more appropriate in r/MensRants. Check it out, people. (I do wish people would stop bitching about us bitching about feminism, though. Read the friggin' sidebar. Jeez.)
/r/MensRights20/01/13 03:11 PM
7

Are we really having this conversation again?
/r/MensRights20/01/13 03:03 PM
14

Well, that makes one thing they're right about. Men don't have reproductive rights. This would help, though.
/r/MensRights20/01/13 01:03 AM
5

"Men can stop rape" ergo, "Women can't stop rape" Men have agency and therefore responsibility. Women have no agency and no responsibility. SO many problems with this type of thinking. Does this really need to be pointed out to you?
/r/MensRights19/01/13 05:14 PM
7

Not only was she driving drunk, with kids in the car, she assaulted a police officer, and she still got away with it. Because of PMS.
/r/MensRights19/01/13 04:06 PM
6

Totally disagree with OP. Since coming here, every person I've talked about MR with has been totally receptive. Male and female. Suddenly they feel safe to open up about their abusive gfs/wives. Or single guys admit that they are disillusioned with women and their double standards. Divorced guys open up. There's some real pain there. we all know guys who have been through it. It's gives men permission to feel. MR is therapeutic. I bet if you're all preachy and self righteous, our your audience i…
/r/MensRights18/01/13 01:10 AM
1

Fuck it. I signed it.
/r/MensRights17/01/13 11:49 PM
3

Thanks for that one.
/r/MensRights16/01/13 05:02 AM
21

Initially, voting rights were extended to white male property holders, universal suffrage came later. edit: clarity
/r/MensRights16/01/13 01:40 AM
8

Niiiiiiice. /s
/r/MensRights15/01/13 11:57 AM
1

Sure. But I think that if you want to challenge cultural assumptions about the way men are "objectified" you could do better than 17, or whatever. The real issue is male disposability. This is a widespread unquestioned notion of masculinity than runs deeper than teen magazine's shitty dating advice. Everyone buys into it, men and women. Maybe these are two different issues. But you can take away all this "objectification" and crass sexualization on both sides, and you'd still have male disposabi…
/r/MensRights15/01/13 03:40 AM
0

That's sexual harassment.
/r/MensRights15/01/13 01:32 AM
9

My favorite: You don't see it because you live with it everyday "What about female privilege?" I just don't see it. (from a post I saw here previously)
/r/MensRights15/01/13 01:29 AM
3

What good is race and gender if it doesn't get you money/social status? Duh.
/r/MensRights15/01/13 01:26 AM
2

Honestly, getting exposed to the MRM has opened my eyes to so many things. The "american l/r divide and rule" is one of them. I suppose I am a victim of it though. Shit. We all are. But you'll be happy to know you won't find much partisan ideology coming from me. Cheers!
/r/MensRights15/01/13 01:19 AM
1

This magazine is drivel. Analyzing it will reveal nothing. Maxim would be comparable of drivel from the other side of the isle. And feminists could easily use it to make their points. This is low hanging fruit. We should aim higher.
/r/MensRights15/01/13 12:18 AM
1

Both statements are nonsense. He's not the one making them though. You clearly don't agree with him (which is fine with me), but you are misrepresenting his positions. And when that fails, resorting to ad hominem. Glad you're not a leftist though, cuz I just friended you. You've got a great post history! It's just your comments that suck ass.
/r/MensRights15/01/13 12:09 AM
1

He didn't say "individualism" was our natural state. But that the "nuclear family" was our best chance at living beyond government dependency and that leftists/feminists/collectivists have undermined the family. What he did say was that the nuclear family occurs naturally when populations are higher, and survival is easier. But you probably didn't hear that because you were distracted by the words on the screen: "LEFTISM POISONS EVERYTHING IT TOUCHES". Either that or you had already turned the v…
/r/MensRights14/01/13 11:07 PM
1

I forgot the "/s". Sorry. I was commenting on comedy. I thought you'd understand.
/r/MensRights14/01/13 12:15 PM
-1

According to a post from SRS r/feminism is now under control of MRAs. Edit: Srs link removed. Please forgive me. I downvoted myself it it makes you feel any better.
/r/MensRights14/01/13 01:47 AM
3

Apparently, were not the only ones who are debating this.
/r/MensRights14/01/13 01:33 AM
6

You're a fucking misogynist scthum! edit: forgot the /s
/r/MensRights14/01/13 01:28 AM
19

This could be a stretch but it reminds me of women's in group bias So very quick to agree/congratulate/affirm one another. My wife tells me all the time how the women she works with talk about their husbands/boyfriends being lazy, dumb, blah blah blah. And they all just lap it up. Tell them women are saints, they'll agree. Men are bastards, mmm hmm. It's like they are supportive to a fault. (NAWALT! I know my wife is a perfect exception, thanks.) We seem to have the exact opposite problem as men…
/r/MensRights14/01/13 01:24 AM
-2

This is feminism discrediting itself. That was my point.
/r/MensRights14/01/13 01:12 AM
2

I've been thinking about this a lot today. I still don't know. I wish some others had weighed in, would made a nice topic for discussion.
/r/MensRights13/01/13 08:59 PM
-3

This "appeal to worse problems" is the same fallacy feminists use to dismiss "what about the menz" rights. I think that's the point if it being posted here. OP needs feminism to save her from the suffering of being beautiful smart and ambitious in the first world. But men don't need equal rights in family court, parental rights, reproductive choice, due process etc. because "women have it worse" (citation needed).
/r/MensRights13/01/13 01:36 PM
6

Breaking news: Man verbally abused for years, and after finally being struck by his pothead wife, smashes her head in with a hammer. Everyone defends him. Just kidding. That never happened.
/r/MensRights11/01/13 12:19 PM
3

Last I checked PMS was a myth. I guess whatever works to avoid taking responsibility for your actions is ok for the fairer sex.
/r/MensRights11/01/13 04:28 AM
1

Conversely, that silly stuff can be posted in r/mrmemes if you just need a good laugh, or something to repost on FB. Edit: formatting
/r/MensRights11/01/13 12:43 AM
1

Yes! I just saw "Cool It" on Netflix. Lazy me. It's hysteria all the damn way. Rape hysteria. Climate change hysteria. Hysteria hysteria. The end result is always that we can't deal with the real issues rationally. Rape exists. Climate change exists. Instead of working to mitigate the damage or manage the consequences, the focus is on fear mongering.
/r/MensRights11/01/13 12:28 AM
1

Exactly.
/r/MensRights11/01/13 12:15 AM
3

there isn't anything that can't be denied and questioned Exactly.
/r/MensRights10/01/13 05:22 AM
3

Wasn't really disagreeing. But not knowing about "sexual assault", or not calling it "sexual assault" doesn't strip it of its character of humiliation. If we don't help kids to deal with these thing, they wind up as adults who cant deal with these things, and we wind up here.
/r/MensRights10/01/13 05:16 AM
1

Many other crimes have actual evidence. Rape is often he said/she said. Taking the polygraph test could just as easily be viewed as an opportunity to bolster one's own claims in lieu of any other evidence. Just sayin' We honestly should not be prosecuting crimes without evidence. That's a basic tenet of our legal system. If women were encouraged to take more responsibility for their own safety we certainly could prevent at least some rapes. But that's called "blaming the victim". Apparently, avo…
/r/MensRights10/01/13 04:58 AM
14

Anyone who has spent any amount of time around groups of children (boys and girls) knows that they can be very cruel, exclusionary, and sadistic. Somehow, we like to ignore this in favor of the view that children are pure and innocent. In truth, they demonstrate many of the same base characteristics we deplore in adults. Even babies who are pure and innocent, are purely selfish and self-centered. These are human characteristics. Attributing them along gender lines is at best useless and at worst…
/r/MensRights10/01/13 04:41 AM
20

Let me help you read. The boy was assaulted. He was 5. The GIRL was alleged PERPETRATOR. She was 7. How would you describe being forced into a bathroom stall, punched in the the stomach, and forced to expose yourself?
/r/MensRights10/01/13 04:13 AM
2

Men Can Stop Money Laundering Well, they do make up 96% of money launderers! Edit: /s Edit #2: Perhaps it also needs pointing out that the victim of murder is not the one making the accusation.
/r/MensRights10/01/13 02:41 AM
0

If its critical of women it must be satire.
/r/MensRights09/01/13 08:16 PM
2

M 30s- USA- Midwest FOR MRM!
/r/MensRights08/01/13 11:08 PM
1

Would that not also have constituted his rape? They were both presumably coerced to have sex without either party's consent. It's kind of proxy rape, I guess, in that the slave's master used both of them to rape each other.
/r/MensRights08/01/13 11:04 PM
9

“female initiation of partner violence is the leading reason for the woman becoming a victim of subsequent violence.” In other words: She was asking for it, officer." BULL. FUCKING. SHIT.
/r/MensRights08/01/13 08:50 PM
8

This is apparently not an unusual feminist position
/r/MensRights08/01/13 08:38 PM
-2

What are you suggesting?
/r/MensRights07/01/13 01:04 AM
2

We need to keep an eye on this one.
/r/MensRights06/01/13 05:30 PM
0

Care to elaborate? I'm interested.
/r/MensRights06/01/13 03:22 PM
-4

Why is this getting down voted? It's seems like a legit issue. This debunks two prevalent myths that impede recognition of MR issues. Women are incapable of violence. Males are never victimized for being male. Furthermore it show the concerted effort that social scientist have made to avoid reporting these types of findings.
/r/MensRights06/01/13 12:19 AM
1

"Maybe she just wanted to rekindle their old flame." The very first sentence is both a joke and an excuse for her behavior. Wow.
/r/MensRights05/01/13 07:54 PM
3

That's insane! Agreed. It seems obvious after minimal research and consideration of the topic, that anyone who boasts certainty about these figures is pushing something other than solid science. What we do know is this: False rape accusations occur. And when they do they can be devastating. We believe is this: ALL people have the right to due process. Edit: formatting ninja style
/r/MensRights05/01/13 07:41 PM
1

Aaaaaand... she just deleted her account.
/r/MensRights04/01/13 12:17 AM
2

I think it's a worthwhile reminder that women, contrary to popular belief, are more than capable of violence against their intimate partners. This false perception leads to many of the actual "rights" issues we face as men.
/r/MensRights03/01/13 10:25 PM
8

"He served 24 years in custody" (italics mine). WTF he was in PRISON call it what it was.
/r/MensRights03/01/13 07:13 AM
1

... And I totally didn't poke holes in those condoms either.
/r/MensRights03/01/13 03:28 AM
3

What if someone tells lies and misleads you into having sex when you otherwise wouldn't have? "I love you." Rape.
/r/MensRights03/01/13 02:25 AM
4

Devils' advocate here. You've overlooked perhaps the most common definition of "pussy", and its meaning in the context of the term, a vulgar word for vagina. While not inherently derogatory, crude. It wouldn't sound much better as "vagina pass" though ( no alliteration). Some women/feminists might say that it reduces a woman to her genitalia, which is objectifying, and in turn misogynistic (unlike the v- monologues, of course). But isn't that the definition of the "pussy pass"- privilege awarded…
/r/MensRights02/01/13 06:57 AM
3

I couldn't make it past 1:10. The smug smile he had on his face was truly disturbing. There's no point in even trying to refute someone who is so blind. Edit: and narcissistic.
/r/MensRights02/01/13 05:01 AM
12

This post is not an a "sweeping generalization" of feminists. It is a valid critique of feminism, and its theoretical underpinnings. Much of what's been on the front page, and in the comments around here for the past few days has been related to feminism, posted by feminist sympathizers with the MRM, who are always, like you, surprised that "we" are so anti-feminist. Hence the reference in the title of this post to its own timing. The feminist movement itself is a Men's Rights issue (though it m…
/r/MensRights02/01/13 04:04 AM
1

Uh oh. Logic. You must hate feelings. /s
/r/MensRights01/01/13 07:23 PM
2

That's what I was thinking to, but, "female privilege" buys into their whole language and discourse about kyriarchy, etc. I think we should attempt to define/create our own language to discuss these things, but I'm not sure "pussy pass" is it. Other suggestions?
/r/MensRights01/01/13 07:19 PM
1

Except that comment was heavily downvoted. (Don't people get how reddit works?) So how can that be used as an example of how this thread is misogynistic? As a whole, clearly, the r/mr hive mind is not so. People (feminists) are going to call us what they already believe us to be. Period. IMO critiquing/debunking/destroying modern feminism is a prerequisite for the MRM. That's why we will always be labeled "misogynist".
/r/MensRights01/01/13 07:15 PM
1

Or casually peruse the sidebar...
/r/MensRights01/01/13 04:51 PM
2

Oppressive societies oppress women. Oppressive societies oppress men. Brutal societies are brutal toward women. Brutal societies are brutal toward men.
/r/MensRights31/12/12 07:00 PM
43

Is greed a male trait now, too? That's rich.
/r/MensRights31/12/12 05:50 AM
0

Here's a fun link on female advantages. Surely, there are some. Most telling is the reaction to the suggestion that women might have it better than men in a few categories. Highly irrational. I couldn't help but to respond to the virgin/slut shaming nonsense. I love the ad hominem "basement dweller" attacks, which were really slightly veiled attempts at male virgin shaming. Read: "he's just mad at women because he can't get laid" blah blah blah
/r/MensRights30/12/12 10:07 PM
1

Just enough to laugh my ass off.
/r/MensRights30/12/12 09:59 PM
5

Lots of the angry commenters are participants in both SRS and... wait for it... r/malefashionadvice! ROFL It's not enough to control what we can say and think... now they want to tell us how to dress, too!!!
/r/MensRights30/12/12 09:35 PM
3

This truth is shocking indeed. I'd like to see statistics of weight by gender. There's a good chance we'd be outweighed. Literally. I'm a slender man and I see women everyday that could flatten me like a pancake. Scary, when they are the protected class. I think I'll start my own sub r/thinmensrights.
/r/MensRights30/12/12 07:26 PM
5

GWW articulated an interesting perspective on this in a recent AVfM podcast. The basic idea was that these stereotypes aren't really good for anyone. You are either the degrader or the degraded. Sex is viewed as an act based on manipulation and coercion, rather than mutual enjoyment. Glad to see some research calling this the bullshit that it is.
/r/MensRights30/12/12 05:31 PM
-1

Annoyed Picard...
/r/MensRights30/12/12 05:17 PM
15

I'll admit I didn't really see the problem with this at first. Your comment made me see the light. Of course, the problem is that when you reverse the pronouns, the statement "he flirted with my friend, he deserved a slap" doesn't elicit the same response at all. People would flatly agree. For fucks sake, people laugh about men having their penises cut off! A slap doesn't even register on the offense-o-meter. Men are pigs, right? If he flirts with her it's only a matter of time before he rapes h…
/r/MensRights30/12/12 03:42 PM
14

Your freedom of speech ends where my ears begin! /s
/r/MensRights30/12/12 03:26 PM
23

Exactly.
/r/MensRights28/12/12 12:28 AM
-1

Legally the shooter was not a child.
/r/MensRights28/12/12 12:27 AM
4

Well, I suppose these events, if true, do lend some credence to the concept of "rape culture" that we often dismiss as feminist rape hysteria propaganda.
/r/MensRights25/12/12 11:50 PM
5

Randomly watching ET right now. Thanks for the insight.
/r/MensRights24/12/12 01:08 AM
3

Her fifteen minutes were up nearly ten years ago. What a joke.
/r/MensRights22/12/12 08:17 PM
6

Didn't read the word "rape" once. It was always "sex". This implies that the five year old boy actually wanted it, right? Are you kidding me?
/r/MensRights22/12/12 07:59 PM
1

Of course, she alleged sexual abuse. Think about it: Why would an abusive father buy his daughter a gun? And ammo. I wonder: if this happened today would she'd even be convicted?
/r/MensRights22/12/12 07:24 PM
3

Given the state of the economy, our universities, and a broken and divided congress in the US, I'd had to agree. I wonder though if MR could actually be the thing that wakes people up to reforming the system...
/r/MensRights22/12/12 06:51 PM
16

Agreed that the names "feminism" & "mens rights" can be problematic. But the naming is not the source of the hypocrisy. Feminism claims to address the issues of men, and actually disenfranchises them. The MRM doesn't claim to solve women's issues, and then work against them. That would be hypocrisy.
/r/MensRights21/12/12 04:12 AM
24

Suicide attempts are about equal though. Men are merely privileged with the competence to succeed. /s
/r/MensRights19/12/12 12:26 AM
1

I was jut going to post this question! I was thinking also that the article on Mens Rights Movement was a little light, and seemed to have as much criticism as substance. I definitely think there should be more info on both pages.
/r/MensRights15/12/12 06:34 AM
5

Thanks for the link! Eye opening.
/r/MensRights14/12/12 04:43 AM
1

I can't believe you are the first and only to mention this in this thread! Really goes to show how men getting rape is not even part of the conversation, as does the fact that the thread even fucking exists.
/r/MensRights13/12/12 12:27 PM
1

Ok, then this: women are collectively too weak to grant consent, therefore all penetrative hetero intercourse is rape... Even when the man is asleep? Just trying to underscore the insanity at work here.
/r/MensRights13/12/12 12:09 PM
3

According to some feminists "a man can rape a woman without touching her." Why do men need to be awake?
/r/MensRights13/12/12 02:50 AM
3

This "critique" doesn't address a single actual MR issue. Misandry is real, but I don't think its a man's right to not be hated. What does any of this have to do with being a "functional" movement? It should have been titled, "How can MRAs can be approved of by feminists?"
/r/MensRights13/12/12 02:48 AM
3

"Oh my! I didn't realize after years of drug use, being a 10bag heroin addict, that Valium and Percocet would get me high, ya know my arthritis..." This speaks to the sexist legal system in which women have no agency in their lives. She was probably abused by a man at some point, so how could she be held responsible for a lifetime of drug abuse and the reckless murder of and innocent man?
/r/MensRights12/12/12 06:27 AM
6

What I think Demonspawn is getting at (not that I entirely agree/disagree) is that the reduction of the importance of these traditional gender roles has contributed to massive upheaval within our society. We don't always notice because we're excited by our new found freedoms- "Holy shit! We can fuck whenever we want to now! Party on!" (Look at the 60's/70's sexual revolution) And the consequences, perhaps disastrous, don't always manifest themselves immediately. He may be taking some leaps of lo…
/r/MensRights12/12/12 03:18 AM
1

Ken Burns is an asshole.
/r/MensRights12/12/12 03:02 AM
7

But if we don't have equal numbers of female biologists we'll never be able to trust the data that supports biological gender differences.
/r/MensRights12/12/12 02:54 AM
2

Do it! Show the world how sensitive and reasonable and open to change men can be.
/r/MensRights12/12/12 01:56 AM
0

Right. Not attacking women, just the ideology that depends on their always being the victim.
/r/MensRights12/12/12 01:25 AM
12

Are you fucking kidding me? I was just starting to feel all mushy inside. Now I'm pissed off again.
/r/MensRights12/12/12 01:23 AM
-3

Rule of thumb: if most comments are questions about if its relevant, it's not. I kept waiting for the article to mention how the father's warnings about the mother were ignored, or his rights were infringed upon. It's just a tragedy, move along.
/r/MensRights11/12/12 05:26 AM
7

She is amazing. I wish I had more hours in the day. I've been watching her vids one by one. Spot on use of this thing called 'logic'.
/r/MensRights11/12/12 05:15 AM
3

http://www.avoiceformen.com/mens-rights/whats-the-difference/
/r/MensRights11/12/12 03:09 AM
0

Why are people upvoting this, and NOT the AMA request itself? Here, I'll make it easy: http://www.reddit.com/r/IAmA/comments/14n1lq/ama_request_manu_sareen_danish_minister_for/
/r/MensRights11/12/12 03:08 AM
7

This focus on actions and results. If MRAs just become male versions of feminazis, the world is going to suck x2. If men are supposedly more logical and rational, then let's use that to our advantage, and present level-headed legal arguments, and challenge the assumptions of gender neutering ideologies with science! I also think women promoting the MRM seem to have a lot of intrinsic value. Could it be that the voice of the MRM is a woman's?
/r/MensRights11/12/12 03:02 AM
0

Thanks for the great questions, gentlemen.
/r/MensRights11/12/12 02:27 AM
2

Poe's Law at it again. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poe's_law
/r/MensRights11/12/12 02:17 AM
1

The follow through... http://www.reddit.com/r/IAmA/comments/14n1lq/ama_request_manu_sareen_danish_minister_for/
/r/MensRights11/12/12 01:51 AM
5

No soap could make a difference. I find r/spacedicks cleansing by comparison. What do you suggest?
/r/MensRights10/12/12 02:22 AM
3

We need 5 questions to ask him. You go first.
/r/MensRights09/12/12 10:42 PM
2

Good to know. The real MR issue is that, as it stands, any SEX can be considered rape after the fact when the burden of proof is unconstitutionally placed upon the accused. So really, "rape" is not the focus here but due process and equal rights under the law.
/r/MensRights09/12/12 10:34 PM
14

This is what we should be celebrating! Lets get this guy to do an AMA or something. Just typing out loud...
/r/MensRights09/12/12 09:08 PM
5

Honestly, gentlemen, why the fuck are we analyzing this? This is not discourse. This is celebrity gossip. Listening to those buffoons makes my feel sick and dumb. Let's focus on anything else, please. BTW what the FUCK does this even have to do with Mens Rights?
/r/MensRights09/12/12 09:04 PM
3

In the sense that it's prone to media sensationalism and irrationality, I agree that it is "overplayed". (See gay marriage/abortion) What's more is that the subtlety and nuance of human sexuality is all too often overlooked, and replaced by the legally useful but reductionist definitions of sex, consent, rape, etc. However, I don't think that it does justice to dismiss all rape claims that don't bear "choke marks". First of all, plenty of consensual sex can leave choke marks. Plenty of male rape…
/r/MensRights09/12/12 08:51 PM
2

Poe's Law. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poe's_law
/r/MensRights09/12/12 07:40 PM
26

I saw this as I was lurking around SRS. They were appalled... by the misogynistic comments that accompanied the video. I know, disgusting right?
/r/MensRights09/12/12 07:33 PM
2

Holy Shit. Shocked. Shaking. MRM is most definitely needed.
/r/MensRights08/12/12 05:12 PM
1

She said "get that light out of my face" not "stop recording me"
/r/MensRights08/12/12 04:35 PM
1

"moment of weakness"
/r/MensRights08/12/12 04:33 PM
5

She's truly deplorable. Why is she even still around? She has no talent. She's fake-hot. Publicly scientifically illiterate. And her schtick is being obnoxious.
/r/MensRights19/11/12 10:38 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter