TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

questionmonger Archive

View 0 posts and 16 comments by questionmonger on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

I'm terribly sorry about your karma, good g[ent][le]sir.
/r/MensRights11/12/13 08:04 PM
0

So, then, the point of making that statement was . . .?
/r/MensRights09/12/13 07:12 AM
0

So, what you're telling me is that you meant that as a compliment?
/r/MensRights09/12/13 07:08 AM
-1

Ascribing stupidity/lack of logic to women as a class? That's pretty sexist. Oh, also using "women" as a personal attack.
/r/MensRights09/12/13 04:52 AM
1

Lots of "MURICA!" in this thread.
/r/MensRights04/12/13 10:58 PM
1

You completely misread what I'm saying. I did not say that there is no correlation between being tall and being smart, I said there's no overlap. No overlap, as in, nobody can be both tall and smart. Imagine a Venn diagram, but the circles don't intersect. Here you go: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Height_and_intelligence I have now provided evidence of an overlap between height and intelligence. I am now making a positive claim, which nullifies your negative claim unless you can refute it. That'…
/r/MensRights02/12/13 04:01 AM
0

There is no overlap between tall people and smart people. I don't need to prove this because I'm not claiming a positive, hurrdurr! That's completely correct, you nitwit. The onus would be on someone to prove that there was a correlation between height and intelligence. Failing the ability to show a correlation, the reasonable conclusion would be that it doesn't exist. Yeah, now I'm gonna wait here while you somehow magically make up some excuse for how all of that is a negative claim that doesn…
/r/MensRights02/12/13 03:54 AM
0

Claiming that there is no overlap between certain groups is not a negative, it's a positive claim. "Claiming that there is no God is not a negative, it is a positive claim." Oh wait, no it isn't. The term "no overlap" denotes a negative. I think you're getting confused with this because the claim you're making can be rephrased as saying "X (overlap between these groups) does not exist". If it can be rephrased as that and still retain the same meaning, then for all intents and purposes it is the …
/r/MensRights02/12/13 03:33 AM
-1

First of all, absence of evidence isn't evidence of absence, you're just asserting that there is no overlap between those groups. You didn't actually prove that it's the case Did you just ask me to prove a negative? LMAO. Could it possibly instead have something to do with how neither men's rights nor white nationalism are widely accepted politically correct ideas to talk about, while LGBT activism, feminism, liberalism, and civil rights are? And why do these two movements share this common char…
/r/MensRights02/12/13 03:16 AM
-1

LOL, not very bright are you? Let me spell it out for you; There is an overlap between MRAs and White Nationalists. There is not an overlap between the groups I mentioned in my previous posts. Why is this?
/r/MensRights02/12/13 03:10 AM
-1

Find me a large contingent of white nationalist liberals, feminists, LGBT activists, and civil rights activists. Until then, your comparison is invalid.
/r/MensRights02/12/13 03:01 AM
-6

At the very least, white nationalist groups are full of MRA types.
/r/MensRights01/12/13 03:13 PM
5

I suppose I should have clarified; I was referring specifically to the United States and the laws that govern our citizens here. That's absolutely terrifying that there's a precedent for that in India, however.
/r/MensRights20/05/13 01:24 AM
14

Criminalizing "friendzoning" sounds exactly like breech of promise laws that governments used to have to prevent men from leading women on. But we don't have them anymore, right? I imagine that's because such a law is unjust and draconian. Advocating for draconian laws to be passed against women is radical. Men already undergo forced abortion and considering that men's bodies also hormonally prime them for fatherhood... Interesting. Have a source on this? Also what are the psychological effects …
/r/MensRights19/05/13 07:37 PM
12

One Two Three There may have been more, but I think three examples should suffice for now. EDIT: Sorry, forgot to add the guy who wants to make "suitor abuse" illegal. Here
/r/MensRights19/05/13 07:24 PM
24

There are no radical MRAs I dunno, there are some pretty radical stances. What about the folks who were advocating for the government to force women to get abortions, or that guy who wanted to criminalize le friendzoning? I'm also pretty sure I've seen a couple people lauding that guy who was in the news a couple days ago for sneaking his pregnant girlfriend abortion pills as an activist. And lets not forget to mention Paul Elam's call for the Jury Nullification of rape cases.
/r/MensRights19/05/13 06:48 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter