TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

questionull Archive

View 0 posts and 32 comments by questionull on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
0

How do I get back into the happy-to-see-you-let's-fuck mindset? By agreeing with your husband, having the courage to obey him, and honouring the privacy and sanctity of your marriage by not discussing it with other people.
/r/TheRedPill11/08/14 05:46 PM
2

Here’s what we do want to kill: the concept of masculinity Heh. She means she wants to kill masculinity itself, not the concept. If she could somehow kill the concept then she would be literally unable to contemplate killing the real thing.
/r/TheRedPill11/08/14 03:45 PM
0

You misunderstand me. I don't want to assign blame. I don't know what the answer is. I simply want to understand. Or look at it from a TRP point of view: if I act against my conscience, won't that tend to reduce my SMV in the long term?
/r/TheRedPill01/08/14 03:57 AM
1

Argumentum ad nauseam.
/r/TheRedPill01/08/14 02:41 AM
0

On the contrary, RPers are showing reluctance to confront a potentially unpleasant truth. If I'm plugged in, it shouldn't be hard to point out the holes in my arguments through rational explanation. So where's the explanation? Btw, the upvote button couldn't be less accurate IMO. The highest scoring comment on this subthread starts by suggesting that woman have agency and then begins the next paragraph with 'sluts will be sluts' -- a flat contradiction.
/r/TheRedPill01/08/14 02:38 AM
0

I question that assumption. People can become shitty or less shitty as a result of their actions, and they can be influenced by other people.
/r/TheRedPill01/08/14 02:07 AM
0

Besides, why does it matter to you? Because there's a truth of the matter of whether it's right to sleep with other men's wives and debate is a means of (sometimes) getting to the truth. The lack of argument is not encouraging. Clearly, this issue matters to the other commenters as much as it does to me, else why the downvotes?
/r/TheRedPill01/08/14 01:57 AM
0

No, the miner didn't intend for the bullet to hit JFK, whereas the putative strong man can intend to seduce another man's wife.
/r/TheRedPill31/07/14 09:34 PM
-8

Are people born sluts? As if the only thing preventing women from cheating are strong men that they are powerless to resist. No, not the only thing, but a contributing factor. And one could argue that a 'strong' man wouldn't harm a marriage for the sake of a few moments of fleeting pleasure. I think there's a fairly sound analogy in the legal concept of entrapment.
/r/TheRedPill31/07/14 08:57 PM
-14

If she is going to go around jumping on dicks, why not have one of them be yours? Well, because it might have been the first time for her and if he hadn't tempted her she might not have done it.
/r/TheRedPill31/07/14 08:41 PM
6

No, I think it's that he is slightly defensive over these issues because of previous public statements he made. With regard to the pedophilia issue, he came in for criticism over this part of his recently published autobiography: "I would watch games of squash from the gallery, waiting for the game to end so I could slip down and practise by myself. One day – I must have been about eleven – there was a master in the gallery with me. He pulled me onto his knee and put his hand inside my shorts. H…
/r/TheRedPill29/07/14 08:37 PM
3

Oh, I'm sure they do happen. See my point about graffiti. Covert and hidden social phenomena are rather fascinating. But difficult to quantify.
/r/TheRedPill29/07/14 02:32 AM
1

when she refuses they actually follow her down the street while calling her a whore. OK, what's their motivation for following and calling her a 'whore'? Is it because they feel humiliated and want revenge, or are they trying to change her mind? I'd like to understand.
/r/TheRedPill28/07/14 09:50 PM
3

But with this policy hoo-ha they get extra attention as well as deterring betas more effectively.
/r/TheRedPill28/07/14 05:39 PM
2

You're so right. I haven't witnessed any cat-calling or flashing either. Which suggests to me that it's rare. Mind you, neither have I witnessed graffiti-spraying, yet there's plenty of evidence that it goes on. One would need to set up an urban version of a birdwatcher hide in order to try to collect the necessary evidence. And work with models wearing mics.
/r/TheRedPill28/07/14 05:35 PM
9

SlutWalk speaker: You realize that you're a little girl, you're told a number of things, right? You're told, 'You've gotta be, you gotta look a certain way, you gotta be a certain kind of pretty.' Right? You also are told that 'This world is violent and that you need to watch your back every second.' You're also told that 'Anything that happens to you on the streets -- you're responsible for. It's your responsibility.' In my view this is a basic but common error. These statements are pure infere…
/r/TheRedPill27/07/14 05:04 PM
1

It is women who define what is masculine. It is men who define what is feminine. That's neat. I used to be quite frustrated by women talking about things like masculinity and 'real men' because I had no idea what they meant. And, to be fair, I don't think they could have described it either, it was just something they felt.
/r/TheRedPill26/07/14 05:56 PM
25

I can't help thinking that the optimum strategy for a young woman who wants a lasting marriage and a happy family might be to identify a young beta male (of roughly her age) who is likely to grow into an alpha male. I don't know what the characteristics of such a young man would be. Somebody with a good heart who takes his work very seriously I suppose. Any suggestions?
/r/TheRedPill25/07/14 11:33 PM
0

There's one kind of alpha that I think cannot be beta-fied, because there's nothing for women to work with. He's a spiritual alpha, an Abraham figure, the opposite of Dark Triad. Can't think of a decent term for him. I'm mentioning this because relationships may be part of the means of becoming more like such a person (or non-person, since he lacks ego). Close relationships bring to the surface all kinds of unconscious baggage and they act like a mirror for the soul. It's a mirror that you can't…
/r/TheRedPill23/07/14 04:04 AM
1

I would agree with you that if she consents in the legal sense then it is not, legally speaking, rape. And women need to accept this, whatever their feels are. However, I think that also men will have to accept that the definition of rape will likely continue to gradually expand in the years to come, as our knowledge increases. But I don't see this as necessarily being a problem. Strong men like to play according to the rules, and win. If it were somehow impossible to rape a woman, there'd be le…
/r/TheRedPill22/07/14 10:44 PM
1

Part of the problem around 'rape' here is a philosophical one to do with the issue of consent. What some or most women understand by consent is sex that doesn't feel exploitative (or isn't later re-interpreted as such). What most men understand by consent is that there was no verbal refusal or physical resistance (absent kinkiness). This is more like a legal definition. I think most rational people prefer the legal definition to the 'feels' definition. However, agreement isn't a merely a legalis…
/r/TheRedPill22/07/14 04:05 PM
6

Interesting post. Your friends liked you for your mind and your conversation. But it seems like you wanted physical relationships too (else why the tall handsome stereotype?) Their female partners picked up on that. Btw, I agree that women are enforcers of sexual prohibitions, but how do you know they used gay-shaming tactics in the three cases you cite?
/r/TheRedPill22/07/14 02:28 PM
1

I think mothers are generally considered evil if they neglect their children. But, yeah, there isn't much else.
/r/TheRedPill21/07/14 09:56 PM
1

I agree with you. One can see flaws without hating, without trying to make guilty. There is another distinction. One can see problems in someone's behaviour without condemning the person. I guess it's a question of motivation. Strong people are trying to create something worthwhile and they fix faults along the way, whereas weak people are deliberately fault-finding in order to try to feel less bad about themselves.
/r/TheRedPill20/07/14 02:32 PM
1

Ah, that's a nice distinction, thank you. I came across a quote from Voltaire yesterday: "Madness is to think of too many things in succession too fast, or of one thing too exclusively.” Your definition of hatred falls into the latter category ('or of one thing too exclusively') and is therefore a form of madness according to Voltaire.
/r/TheRedPill20/07/14 02:26 PM
1

What's the difference between hate and disdain?
/r/TheRedPill20/07/14 01:01 AM
6

Being PC is also a way to protect oneself from other PCers, so it's a self-reinforcing behaviour. Pointing out the flaws in other people, trying to make them guilty, or make oneself the victim, is a way many people seem to get more power. The strategy exploits the Christian idea of standing up for the weak, which is fairly standard morality across the West. By contrast, truly good people seem to have a hard time finding fault with anyone (including themselves).
/r/TheRedPill19/07/14 11:32 PM
15

Calling some group a "hate group" is a way of trying to shut it down. It is itself a form of hatred. Hence the expression "Hear no evil, see no evil, speak no evil."
/r/TheRedPill19/07/14 11:06 PM
14

Great stuff. But what happens when two RPers approach one another on the same street?
/r/TheRedPill18/07/14 05:03 PM
14

One way to stop blaming anybody (self or others) is to realise that sexual game has up till now been largely unconscious. There's no way that most women could have duped most men for so long had they not been duped themselves. The reality is that we are dealing here with memes and genes, not with intentional behaviour. We're all starting to grow up some more now.
/r/TheRedPill18/07/14 12:05 PM
1

He has fantastic intelligence and strength, apart from his seeming inability to laugh at himself. Agree and amplify would have been stronger -- or perhaps he was avoiding that in order to maintain his iron grip on the conversation.
/r/TheRedPill18/07/14 11:32 AM
6

Good, clear analysis. Thank you. It's worth noting that everyone's answers to truth-seeking questions are to some extent are affected by personality and overall disposition. So a given answer may be a form of self-expression, an attempt to curry favour, to impress a third party, to protect oneself from attack, to deceive for amusement, to say what is true, what one wishes were true, or what one fears may be true, etc, etc. I just wish more people would realise that with practice it's possible to…
/r/TheRedPill13/07/14 06:06 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter