qwertpoi Archive

Upvotes	Title	Category	Author	Subreddit	Date (UTC)

Upvotes	Comment on	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
36	Incels got banned. What does that mean for TRP? Also, the advice of "buck up bro, if you get a high-paying job you'll get women to have sex with you!" is definitely not very encouraging. First the difficulty of acquiring such a job, second the knowledge that you'll never get women on your looks or personality...	/r/TheRedPill	08/11/17 07:20 PM
9	If you get married.. you might not lose 50%. You might lose 150%. Depends on the state. In most cases 50% is the STARTING point, and then the judge can raise or lower it based on other factors, usually based on the wife's ability to look after herself and maintain the standard of living to which she is accustomed.	/r/TheRedPill	08/09/16 03:09 PM
6	Feminism: it's always rights for women and responsibilities for men. Just so happens that the people who are attacking men's rights most aggressively are people who call themselves feminists, and feminism and its adherents are doing little to reign them in. If Feminists won't control their own, then you need some outside force to oppose its excesses and abuses.	/r/MensRights	31/08/16 01:49 AM
12	Feminism: it's always rights for women and responsibilities for men. I think the worst were the ones who were saying that a man owes child support because the child was not a party to the decision to conceive it and deserves to have support if it is brought into the world. Which creates an interesting double standard. The child has no right to live if the woman decides to abort it (despite the fact that the child's interests aren't represented in that decision) YET if the child is born suddenly it is entitled to the man's support, even if the man had not consente…	/r/MensRights	31/08/16 01:47 AM
273	Minecraft creator Notch Steps Up to Take on Man Hating Bigots with Bonus Shutting Down of a White Knight and How Being Successful isn't a crime! Juicy! The thing is they HAVEN'T accomplished all their goals... there are still millions of women being oppressed in dozens of countries around the world. But given that those countries are often run by People of Color and it would take actual WORK to go over there and influence change, they've pretty much reverted to using Feminism to bolster their own status and line their own pockets. White women are arguably the least oppressed and downtrodden group on earth at the moment, and they're using femini…	/r/PussyPassDenied	22/06/16 02:41 PM
4	[FR] Erased the idea of getting laid and went to a party to have fun, ended up fucking two separate girls. Context and delivery are fucking EVERYTHING with that. Don't do it if you're too awkward because it WILL come across like you're stating your true inner racist beliefs. But if you're at a party, the mood is light, and everyone is in a good mood, a well delivered offensive one-liner will go over well. Even if the girl IS offended, the pressure is on her to let it go rather than to spoil the mood. And throw in self-depreciation to show you consider yourself fair game. In the context it makes it mu…	/r/TheRedPill	31/05/16 08:38 PM
5	Feminist Karen DeCrow on Male Reproductive Rights Or, to put it more simply: "If you want men out of your uterus, then you have to get out of their wallet."	/r/MensRights	26/08/15 12:58 AM
2	Hillary Clinton 'to announce 2016 presidential campaign' - Get ready for cries of "SEXISM!" whenever she gets criticized. So you're suggesting voting third party?	/r/MensRights	10/04/15 08:54 PM
3	More wage gap mythology and first world problems : "There's a Biking Gender Gap. And It Has a Real Economic Impact." Yeah, when I saw the 'inability to carry children' I was like, WHAT? I've seen tons of people biking around with their kids in tow. This is clearly a case of being ignorant of your options and not some bias in bicycling against women. The market has considered these needs and provided solutions. Why are they ignoring them?	/r/MensRights	09/12/14 08:15 PM
2	Germany to Require 30 Pct Women in Top Boardrooms. Another nail in the coffin for Europe. The women may have no ability what so ever but still will be appointed. And there you have it. Actual evidence that this is a net negative for economic performance. I'm sure the German government has given full consideration to the implications of this rule before choosing to implement it. They surely wouldn't ignore reality, would they?	/r/MensRights	26/11/14 08:34 PM
1	Germany to Require 30 Pct Women in Top Boardrooms. Another nail in the coffin for Europe. The women may have no ability what so ever but still will be appointed. This will likely mean a pretty big boost in pay for boardwomen, possibly one that will boost them over the men, all else being equal. I don't know how any other German laws will affect this, but the ostensible affect of this is to make any semi-competent female board member a very valuable commodity. Depending on the penalties in place for noncompliance then companies will be fighting heavily to hire on female board members, which of course will drive up their demand. Given a relatively fixed su…	/r/MensRights	26/11/14 07:54 PM
11	Great response to the viral feminist propaganda from FCKH8, "Potty Mouthed Princesses" It worked in the sense that anybody who was already on board loved it and shared it and it did go viral. It definitely, SERIOUSLY backfired because people weren't getting mad that little girls were using profanity (that they don't even comprehend at that age, probably) but people got angry that they were using children to propagate a false and inflammatory message. I mean, I support free speech 100%. But using children as the vessels for your speech just tells me that you're perfecting fine with…	/r/MensRights	26/10/14 10:02 AM
6	Cracked mocks male victims of domestic violence. Yeah, Cracked has made their position on that situation perfectly clear. When I saw that they gave Zoey Quinn an article all to her own and didn't bother giving anyone else a hearing, I really realized how deep the 'rabbit hole' goes. Now you've got a bunch of ostensibly unrelated media platforms functionally colluding to instantiate one particular narrative of events against any and all critiques. Its heavy-handed, self-preserving propaganda, and it all starts reminding me of Soviet style revis…	/r/MensRights	22/10/14 11:36 PM
1	Harvard Law professors take a stand against draconian new sexual assault policies There's also the potential for this law to create new problems. For instance, even if there weren't a significant incidence of false rape accusations before, this may actually lead to an increase simply by providing a nifty little tool for making accusations and avoiding consequences. That is to say, even if most people wouldn't abuse such a law, the few that would will actively seek to use this new 'tool' to their advantage. As an extreme comparison, it'd be like a law that made it illegal to i…	/r/MensRights	16/10/14 12:17 AM
7	Cracked.com takes things to another level: video about sexist stereotypes in ads turns into an open attack on Men's Rights. One of the most annoying/terrifying things about modern feminism is how it can slowly infiltrate something you held dear and then, out of almost nowhere, suddenly dominate it completely demolish whatever it used to be and create a new mouthpiece in its place. It can happen to your favorite creator or group easily. A person who before was a perfectly reasonable, rational adult gets hit by the SJW bug and boom, everything is sexist, racist, and problematic and its all WHITE MENS' fault. Doesn't ma…	/r/MensRights	01/10/14 05:51 PM
23	The tragic loss of personal responsibility and the article which got a Forbes writer fired for discussing the sad state of modern campus life I'm somewhat at a loss as to which part of this article was objectionable. The title? Hyperbolized to be sure but that is literally the norm for internet writing. Feminist writers (and hell, mainstream writers) have made more ridiculous claims in their headlines and gone on to say worse in their piece. The offhanded remarks against female drunkenness? I can see people taking that wrong but its all well within the bounds of polite and reasonable discourse. Hes commenting on his own observations a…	/r/MensRights	25/09/14 06:19 PM
9	This "Unlearn Sexism" sign has been put around Ryerson University campus. Fact: Sexism is a one way street. Seriously. There's a difference between 'oppression' and 'basic hygiene and appearance standards.' Nobody (well, almost nobody) is saying you have to adhere to the standards, but people are generally expected to meet some standards. If you think the standards are unfair its fine to protest them, but holy cow don't tell people who willingly adhere to different standards that they're being 'oppressive.' You're not entitled to social acceptance, amazingly enough.	/r/MensRights	10/09/14 04:08 AM
18	This "Unlearn Sexism" sign has been put around Ryerson University campus. Fact: Sexism is a one way street. Wow. This thread here is basically the most poignant summation of why the MRM exists I've ever read. Shame /r/bestof doesn't take submissions from here anymore.	/r/MensRights	10/09/14 04:02 AM
18	5 Feminist Myths That Will Not Die Its necessary in order for their 'patriarchy theory' to make sense. Men have to be the sole blameworthy actors. If a woman does something blameworthy, they excuse her by denying her agency, since 'the patriarchy' made her do it. If women have agency, then the patriarchy theory cracks and falls apart. And without patriarchy theory, they can't blame all men for all bad things that happen, which is the power they value most highly.	/r/MensRights	02/09/14 09:43 PM
1	Truly Radical Feminism I always hated the fact that feminism predicated itself off of a perceived male superiority, especially a superiority that they implicate across all aspects of life. Yup. Modern Feminism fails due to the insistence of modern feminists on basing their ideas on outdated Patriarchy theory. The idea that society is built on every level to advantage men over women is simply inaccurate when you can point towards many examples where men are specifically disadvantaged by society and others where women a…	/r/MensRights	20/08/14 09:32 AM
1	TIL men can't be objectified by women. It's only bad when men do it. Because reasons. Give me a list of the circumstances under which women can objectify men, and then a list of the circumstances under which men can objectify women. Now find the overlap, that is, the circumstances in which either gender can objectify the other. How prevalent are those circumstance in real life? The central difference they're claiming is that its because "men haven’t experienced systematic, centuries-long objectification like women have." Since men can't experience centuries of systematic objectif…	/r/MensRights	07/08/14 08:57 PM
18	TIL men can't be objectified by women. It's only bad when men do it. Because reasons. This is really what gets me. Its not as if the feminists are saying "yes women can objectify men, but men do it more and its more harmful when they do it." They're not arguing that its an inequality in that sense. They're saying that women literally cannot, under any set of circumstances, objectify a man. As in it never happens and even if it did happen, it didn't. Because apparently there is only patriarchy and equality, nothing in between. And to justify it, they craft a very specific and deli…	/r/MensRights	05/08/14 10:43 PM
7	‘Women against feminism’ movement grows -Today Show It does mean something, but they clearly don't follow the dictionary definition. Similarly, if you point out that the dictionary definition of 'sexism' simply means prejudice or discrimination against another person based on their gender, they'll vehemently claim "that's wrong though! Women can't be sexist!" Simply put, they can't declare the that dictionary definition of Feminism is the one that we should apply to them if they themselves don't want the dictionary definition of sexism applied to…	/r/MensRights	04/08/14 03:10 AM
17	Thunderf00t! "IF Men acted like FEMINISTS!" That's some top-notch satire. I like the central point that the standard 'mooks' in most video games and movies... the ones that are mowed down by the dozen by the heroes and are discarded without concern by villains are almost universally men. Regardless of the race or gender or age or sexuality of the protagonist, the enemies they'll be demolishing will almost assuredly be male. Yet if a video game dares to portray the abuse of a single female character, even if its in a negative light, THAT i…	/r/MensRights	29/06/14 02:27 AM
2	"You cannot be sexist toward men." I also have to wonder about this: If they can be prejudiced and its fine for them to be prejudiced, then it implies that prejudice is not a bad thing, in and of itself. So if they say that prejudice is not a bad thing in and of itself, how can prejudice + power be a bad thing? Unless power is a bad thing by itself (which MAY be their assertion), prejudice wouldn't just become a bad thing because the person holding it has power. So either they have to admit that prejudice is also a bad thing (whi…	/r/MensRights	23/06/14 05:46 AM
42	"You cannot be sexist toward men." Note that they acknowledge in this post that you CAN be prejudiced against men, but by their definitions being prejudiced isn't as bad as being 'racist' or 'sexist' because you have no POWER!!! I suspect this is how they justify their blatant prejudice (read: racism and sexism) against the groups they've deemed as powerful, and can do this without any sense of irony. "I may be racially prejudiced, but at least I'm not RACIST!" Sounds silly when you put it like that, yes?	/r/MensRights	22/06/14 12:06 PM
16	Is this what they mean by "Male Privilege" Yes, but there's little risk of death or grievous injury, and you're not subjecting your body to things that will probably create problems down the line like cancer.	/r/MensRights	12/06/14 10:32 PM
126	Is this what they mean by "Male Privilege" I find it very telling that its very common to complain about the gender wage gap, yet they only seem to focus on the, shall we say, 'cushy' jobs that rarely require much risk. You've got men out there doing the jobs that are absolute shit but are also key to the existence of modern society, and are paid accordingly, and you've got feminists demanding a larger role for women in the workplace, but you do not see many women lining up to do the shit jobs. I think the saying goes "Its easy to compla…	/r/MensRights	12/06/14 08:04 PM
28	A debate tactic I'm gettin' real sick of. The jerkass response would be thusly: 130 million women in the U.S. have never been raped in their lifetime 81.7% of women have never had a rape attempted against them. 97.8% of women were not raped before the age of 12, 92.3% of women were never raped before the age of 17 Every 90 seconds, 313,999,999 people in the U.S. are not sexually assaulted. If they think stating context-free big numbers makes a point, then the above points are just as valid. Most women aren't going to be put in that situ…	/r/MensRights	07/06/14 08:54 PM
4	Bullshit article of the day So what I'm getting is that death threats shouldn't be taken seriously if a woman or feminist makes them? Bit sexist, no?	/r/MensRights	04/06/14 07:04 PM
8	"Teach boys that girls are not sexual objects" I'm just going to say this: I do not think it is possible to 'teach away' puberty. Boys (and girls!) at that age are pumped full of hormones that make them biologically inclined to view certain things as 'sexual,' to arouse them, and to cause them to desire sexual contact. If a girl is wearing a low cut top and she crosses the line of vision of a teen boy, no amount of 'teaching' is going to stop him from zeroing in on the cleavage, at least at first. Its not that he views her as a sexual object…	/r/MensRights	02/06/14 01:24 AM
11	"Reverse Sexism Does Not Exist" It also ignores that there are clearly places where women can oppress men complete independent of any 'patriarchal' system. This is just an example of them twisting evidence to suit their theories rather than adjusting or abandoning their theory (which they can't afford to do). And this of course also runs counter to their 'equality' narrative. If they literally cannot imagine any scenario under which 'reverse sexism' (horrible term) can exist, then they are saying that women must be inherently …	/r/MensRights	27/05/14 10:45 PM
48	60 Minutes admits feminism has stifled scientific research which is now showing the genders are very different on a cellular level. The same /r/science that currently has an article about how women produce different breast milk depending on whether they have a male or female baby, on the front page? http://www.reddit.com/r/science/comments/1y4pod/mothers_milk_made_to_order_for_boys_girls_mothers/ You sure?	/r/MensRights	17/02/14 04:43 PM
11	More women enrolling at universities -- no gender equality issue seen Among undergraduates, female numbers in architecture and building have remained at about 38-40 per cent; in engineering they have stayed at about 14 per cent, but in information technology their proportion has fallen from 23 per cent to 15 per cent over the past 10 years. Although women are in the majority in the other seven main fields, they dominate education by a ratio of four to one and in health by three to one. In the broad field of society and culture, two out of three students are female…	/r/MensRights	25/11/13 04:53 PM
-4	X-post from /r/AnythingGoesPics on gender equality I prefer the term 'individual rights' since it accounts for the possibility of other sentient life other than Homo Sapiens.	/r/MensRights	28/09/13 06:02 PM
2	Why feminism doesn't ask for women to take on hard labour jobs? I think I would have a lot more respect for feminism if I saw them demanding to do the hard dangerous jobs as well as the 'fun' ones. But you NEVER see signs at protests demanding "more women coal miners!" or "I want to risk my life on a daily basis too!" If they're truly about equality in any meaningful sense, they should be calling for logging companies and roofers to hire more women. I'd like to see some signs like "Garbage man? More like Garbage person! I can heft trash around all day too!" …	/r/MensRights	13/09/13 04:36 AM