TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

qwerty133 Archive

View 1 posts and 121 comments by qwerty133 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
38

qwerty133/r/MensRights29/02/12 09:29 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Others in this thread have already spelled it out, but once again, it's just such an incredible absurdity that he says we should promote marriage and encourage fatherhood when his policies have done nothing but discourage marriage and fatherhood.
/r/MensRights18/02/13 11:33 PM
24

No, even worse, she just doesn't care. She literally and explicitly thinks innocent people from the "other" group should have their lives destroyed in one of the most brutal fashions possible so that people from her own group can supposedly benefit. She is a real-life monster.
/r/MensRights18/02/13 11:26 PM
4

I'm glad you put the one before the other rather than the reverse, because the old "The real victims of false rape accusations are female victims of rape!" thing annoys me to no end.
/r/MensRights14/07/12 05:41 AM
5

Absolutely. If her own standard of anyone who says anything offensive is to be assaulted was followed, she would be in a hospital bed, because her post is abhorrent.
/r/MensRights10/07/12 06:14 AM
2

Feminists, if they actually understand the hateful ideology they are representing, are indeed out to get him, and the ones who don't fully understand the ideology they are associating themselves with when they identify as feminist (most of them) are serving the interests of the ones who are out to get him.
/r/MensRights08/07/12 02:55 AM
1

He seems to be saying that without making money for someone else, men have no masculine identity, and now one needs to be created for them. Uh, no? To put it bluntly, if without making money for other people you don't have a masculine identity, I feel sorry for you. There's some masculine pride in taking care of your loved ones, and there is some in being financially successful too. But to try to reduce masculinity to that, or to even try to claim that that is a central part of masculinity, is p…
/r/MensRights08/07/12 02:46 AM
1

A man's body is worth every bit as much as a woman's body and deserves exactly as much protection. If you observe that men's bodies, or black people's bodies, or poor people's bodies receive less protection against attack, the conclusion isn't "It's because they are worth less" it is "This is unacceptable discrimination and must be changed."
/r/MensRights06/07/12 08:01 PM
10

It's one of the most absurd and infuriating things. If you don't have the right to defend yourself you don't have rights period.
/r/MensRights05/07/12 04:41 PM
4

Absolutely. Go to a trashy club sometime (except don't). Hell, go anywhere. A man knows that if he throws a drink in a man's face, strikes another man, or in any way attacks another man, he will have to fight, possibly with someone who will seriously injure him, possibly with someone with weapons. Many women on the other hand do these things expecting to not be held accountable for their actions by the victim or to be defended by every man around her.
/r/MensRights02/07/12 09:34 PM
11

Except they do claim they are the only group that can push society towards equality, try to silence and disenfranchise anyone that disagrees with them, and actively work to take basic human rights away from men.
/r/MensRights30/06/12 04:12 AM
1

I'm of two minds about whether or not it makes sense to keep posting trash articles like this.
/r/MensRights27/06/12 07:48 PM
0

This is more or less my initial reaction. I don't find this very consequential at all so I guess I'll have to leave the analysis to those who do.
/r/MensRights27/06/12 07:02 AM
14

You really hit the nail on the head. I once saw a thread in 2XC saying precisely the hypothetical dialogue you just wrote (except without the male response) and ended up trying to enlighten them with essentially the hypothetical male response you wrote. Most of them just didn't get it and couldn't escape the narrative that seems to dominate their thinking. Despite the fact that men are the target of violence at a rate far, far higher than women and have none of the social and legal protections t…
/r/MensRights27/06/12 05:22 AM
1

Looks like there's some pretty crappy comments in that thread...
/r/MensRights22/06/12 10:53 PM
12

I posted this half a year ago and this is still what I think about the issue of so-called "nice guys": It's a complicated issue, but one thing that sticks out to me here is that at least some of the time, this "nice guy" meme is just a Just World Fallacy. A woman sees a guy who conforms to the things they say they want in a man and treats her well, but lacks confidence and forcefulness and all the other primal things women are actually attracted to, and so is not attracted to him (perhaps even t…
/r/MensRights22/06/12 10:45 PM
1

Creep shaming is a lot bigger than the things you are talking about though. The most important part of the issue imho has nothing to do with dating or sex, it is that creep shaming leads directly to violence and legal discrimination against men, or rather, is a weapon often used to initiate violence and legal discrimination against men.
/r/MensRights21/06/12 05:38 AM
1

Grossly inappropriate.
/r/MensRights16/06/12 12:04 AM
3

Then let men take their money elsewhere so they can become the women-only store they aspire to be and let these guys lose 40% or whatever of their business.
/r/MensRights09/06/12 07:50 PM
4

It's also the same as saying "It is not possible to be racist against black people." And in a lot of ways that is a more representative analogy of the situation men face.
/r/MensRights09/06/12 07:46 PM
7

If it was the other way around they would be shouting about the laughable concept of the "War on Women!"
/r/MensRights07/06/12 12:28 AM
1

As if this has ever actually occurred in the history of the universe. Maybe if our bureaucracies were staffed by robots it could be determined when two candidates were objectively, mathematically equal, and then and only then could one of those two candidates be institutionally discriminated against to achieve some social engineering goal. In practice this is totally impossible and laughably naive, as our bureaucracies are staffed by very much imperfect humans, and any type of legalized discrimi…
/r/MensRights04/06/12 06:27 AM
5

Really? That was the best you could do to try and push away a concept that makes you uncomfortable, deploying the tired fallacy that a difference in magnitude makes comparison impossible? If that's the best you can do then move on.
/r/MensRights24/05/12 03:55 AM
25

Every time I think feminism can't get any more abominable it does. That someone would call a shift towards equality a "glass escalator" and talk about it as a bad thing bad thing because it represents a minority (men in female-dominated professions) getting marginally closer to parity with the entrenched majority, is despicable. These people are the modern day equivalent of Apartheid supporters.
/r/MensRights23/05/12 01:18 AM
5

I'll leave it to someone else to go into detail about how marginal a defense a pre-nup is, because of how judges will just throw them out on a whim.
/r/MensRights20/05/12 04:56 AM
3

"Needless to say, being nominated an "academic" or an "expert in the field" (and being paid, largely by public funding, to play the part) does not provide any evidence of your actual ability or willingness to reason and confront the inconsistencies of your own worldviews." Yep. Considering the state of academia right now, it sometimes means just the opposite.
/r/MensRights20/05/12 02:31 AM
4

Of course. If you want to oppress people it helps to first pretend they belong to a shadowy cabal that is secretly trying to oppress you. It doesn't mean jack if some crazy guy whips out his dick at you on the subway because he was crazy and horny, but when that guy is actually a secret agent of the "Patriarchy" conspiracy, you can try to use him to justify taking away the rights of everyone else with a dick and lavish all sorts of bonus "rights" on yourself.
/r/MensRights20/05/12 02:25 AM
5

I wouldn't have thought much of this but the content of this article is really telling and awful. It isn't even a case of this being one of those things where we have to imagine the scenario with genders reversed and mull things over and come to conclude that there is sexism going on, because it is just so shameless and jarringly blatant in this article. It is almost from the very first paragraph excuses and explanations, and almost every sentence is either implicitly or explicitly framing the s…
/r/MensRights19/05/12 08:52 AM
8

Except of course that isn't remotely consistent, it's just absurd hand-wavey nonsense they tell each other to justify their disgusting prejudice.
/r/MensRights16/05/12 05:42 AM
2

Sort of, but there's no true equivalent because creep-shaming isn't just a call to degrade the character of the man in question, it's also a call to mob or police violence against him.
/r/MensRights15/05/12 06:05 AM
5

A fucking disgrace in every way possible.
/r/MensRights15/05/12 06:00 AM
10

I doubt this useless pretentious douche ever had much in common with men.
/r/MensRights14/05/12 05:00 AM
3

Gross.
/r/MensRights11/05/12 06:50 PM
5

It's really not so much cunning as fucking retarded.
/r/MensRights01/05/12 12:29 AM
2

Gross. What more needs to be said? She is just a disgusting human being.
/r/MensRights25/04/12 06:59 PM
10

I love how they are referring to the absence of discrimination as being discrimination. The word's meaning has been completely inverted by these people. What is discrimination of course is giving a person less requirements to gain a job because of what is between their legs.
/r/MensRights14/04/12 08:58 PM
9

It's nice that for once a judge actually respects a contract made between two free people rather than tearing it up and inventing some imaginary, unsigned contract that the man somehow is supposed to have implicitly agreed to that says his ex-wife gets to take everything he ever worked for.
/r/MensRights08/04/12 10:59 PM
2

Because they are delusional morons and actively committed to remaining delusional morons.
/r/MensRights07/04/12 02:25 AM
5

It's kind of hard for me to take seriously a guy who made a show as tiresome and unfunny as Two and A Half Men.
/r/MensRights03/04/12 02:12 AM
16

Exactly. This is the real "rape culture".
/r/MensRights02/04/12 05:57 AM
5

That's okay, I'm sure now that young city-dwelling women are making more than young city-dwelling men the media will begin asking if young men are discriminated against - oh wait, they're just calling them losers and manchildren.
/r/MensRights02/04/12 01:58 AM
6

Well she was stealing your property imho, so in a perfect world it should be okay to use force to get it back but obviously this isn't a perfect world...
/r/MensRights02/04/12 12:55 AM
16

You are conflating feminism with women's rights. I very much support women's rights, and on its merits I oppose feminism, and I think most in this sub-reddit are the same. I see very few opponents of women's rights here, and I'm fairly inclined to think these continual accusations are just some form of gaslighting.
/r/MensRights01/04/12 03:02 AM
25

I'd say you hit the nail on the head, especially after looking at that picture linked of the woman in question, and I don't say that to be mean either.
/r/MensRights27/03/12 08:48 PM
1

Thanks for this. Do you think it makes sense to interpret this as implying that boys are less "mature" than girls though? There is a huge difference between the biological term 'mature' describing an organism that cannot be expected to continue changing as time passes, and the colloquial term 'mature' meaning more aware, responsible, intelligent, or whatever else a person might define it as. I certainly wouldn't look at data describing how girls brains start to shrink sooner than boys brains do …
/r/MensRights27/03/12 08:27 PM
1

I'm guessing you know more about MRI studies of brain development than I do but what you are saying makes no sense to me. I don't know how you would ever go about defining "maturity" let alone measure it through MRI studies.
/r/MensRights27/03/12 05:02 AM
1

Quite right, except that youngish urban women statistically make even more than youngish urban men, so not only is the wage gap myth a myth, it is today even more out of touch with reality than before.
/r/MensRights24/03/12 03:05 AM
17

...and this after all the furor over hazing in fraternities.
/r/MensRights23/03/12 03:54 PM
3

The so-called war on women is the left's version of the war on Christmas.
/r/MensRights17/03/12 01:26 AM
9

I think it's silly to have a bunch of stuff about online dating on there and leave out all the really galling female privileges/male disprivileges. I'm concerned about a man being thrown in prison for a crime he didn't commit. I'm concerned about institutionalized discrimination in government, the workplace, and academia. I'm a lot less concerned about a man being able to get a date.
/r/MensRights16/03/12 06:23 AM
15

Stoicism has a place, but at the moment I'm more convinced that our stoicism as a gender is holding us back. We are being walked all over, and the longer we stay silent the longer the people removing our rights and cheering on the removal of our rights will be able to show their bigotry in public. The current atmosphere is one in which bigoted individuals are patting themselves on the back while decent people are afraid to speak up. The squeaky wheel has been getting the grease for a long time n…
/r/MensRights15/03/12 03:15 AM
-1

Hit the nail on the head with the post title. People are so ready to gobble up this meme that women are unique in having their private lives invaded by government that they completely ignore the staggering degree to which it happens to men, and even cheer it on. It would be perversely funny if it weren't so tragic.
/r/MensRights14/03/12 06:54 AM
1

Ha, I'd assume so.
/r/MensRights14/03/12 01:23 AM
3

It compares because slave owners were people who kidnapped other people and raped and mutilated them while forcing them to labor on plantations. That's just about the worst thing you can call a person, it is grossly offensive and cheapens the atrocity that was slavery. To call some guy working at McDonalds a wage slave, and his boss a slave owner, is very offensive, yet not uncommon among leftist commentators. And yeah, people were angry about the Michael J. Fox thing, but there wasn't this leve…
/r/MensRights14/03/12 01:00 AM
3

I disagree that Limbaugh pulled out all the stops, he is a tremendous dick and always has been, but I don't think his rhetorical flourishes were any more outrageous than what is typical. For instance, partisans routinely describe minimum wage labor as slave labor, and this is just as offensive a comparison if not far more so, as calling someone a prostitute for some equally contrived reason. And we didn't see this level of outrage even when Limbaugh accused Michael J. Fox of faking his Parkinson…
/r/MensRights14/03/12 12:50 AM
1

Not to mention, simply fabricated statistics.
/r/MensRights12/03/12 02:20 AM
2

Can we please not co-opt this "patriarchy" nonsense? It would make far more sense to call it "matriarchy" but even better yet is to simply call it what it is rather than play these silly conspiracy theory games - 'misandrist'.
/r/MensRights12/03/12 02:18 AM
1

Because the lie results in enormous damage to the victim? (Extreme mental anguish, destruction of their good name and social standing, legal costs, health costs, the very real possibility of being thrown into the inhumane rape dungeon called prison, the very real possibility of never being able to find work or decent housing ever again, the very real possibility of losing your family and children) I have absolutely no idea where you are coming from to think accusing someone of a crime with conse…
/r/MensRights12/03/12 02:08 AM
1

Pretty much this. There will always be dumb posts in every reddit. At least here what very few dumb posts there are get downvoted into oblivion rather than pulled to the top, unlike in some other popular reddits. I'd consider most of these continual accusations of r/Mensrights being misogynistic to be gaslighting, or simply people's feelings of umbrage at having their privileges and misconceptions pointed out.
/r/MensRights12/03/12 01:56 AM
3

The type of person that propagates this ridiculous idea that men are sub-citizens who should not morally be allowed to defend themselves against an attacker, is the worst type of person.
/r/MensRights12/03/12 01:43 AM
1

Yeah, I was agreeing with you I have no idea why people downvoted you.
/r/MensRights07/03/12 06:58 AM
12

The term ghettos makes no sense in this context. 'Old Girls' Clubs' or something similar would be more appropriate given the implications of the article. Yet of course, in titling this article they use a word that implies that women are somehow victims rather than beneficiaries or perpetrators.
/r/MensRights06/03/12 11:27 PM
3

What you say is technically accurate but in this case I feel it is petty and trifling to have a thread about some largely irrelevant thing a teen girls posted on facebook, when there are serious issues to deal with.
/r/MensRights04/03/12 05:25 AM
1

I would spend no time listening to what a Feminist has to say about prostitution. Feminists have the blood of every sex worker that is raped or murdered on their hands. These people would be working in heated buildings with doctors, bouncers, and break rooms and could earn in minutes what most people earn in a week, were it not for the anti-choice prostitution laws Feminists have helped prop-up. Instead they are on the streets and back alleys.
/r/MensRights03/03/12 11:54 PM
3

You put it exactly right. She thought she belonged to a privileged class that could hurt others without consequence. This is little different than some slavemaster or member of the landed gentry going around thinking they can smack up the commoners and get away with it. She got precisely what she deserved, and the guy doing the punching didn't come anywhere close to exceeding his rights to defend himself.
/r/MensRights03/03/12 11:46 PM
1

I couldn't agree more.
/r/MensRights01/03/12 06:39 AM
1

I agree, but it will be harder, and our audience will have to be the rarer breed that is good-hearted and intelligent people, we will have a hard time converting the dregs the way they have.
/r/MensRights01/03/12 02:40 AM
1

You're right that feminists are propagandists, but he is right in that that they are propagandizing to an audience that is willing to drink the kool-aid it is given. Men couldn't for example expect to write up a version of the feminist Duluth model and have meat-head, white-knight cops violently enforce it. They enforce these things because they enjoy playing out their ancient primal fantasies of beating up the other guy to secure the approval of the woman.
/r/MensRights01/03/12 02:30 AM
6

I'm not surprised that people who's jobs require that they understand the full workings of a mechanical system, and punish being objectively wrong (no matter how much they might intuit, feel, or assume themselves to be right) with the catastrophic failure of that system, are also able to understand the workings of our human systems.
/r/MensRights01/03/12 02:12 AM
8

You pretty much summed it up. It's very hard to not be sensationalist about the current state of men's rights because the sum result of all these oppressive and laughably unjust government policies is more or less men living in some sort of state of slavery where they have no rights, nothing they create or work for can't be stolen from them, no prison is too inhumane to throw them in, and no amount of innocence or due diligence can protect them. Not every man will necessarily meet one of the awf…
/r/MensRights01/03/12 01:57 AM
7

Agreed. Men are trained to hide their fears, especially in front of women, and this is part of the reason for the misunderstanding.
/r/MensRights29/02/12 10:12 PM
5

Sounds good to me.
/r/MensRights14/01/12 11:12 PM
0

Agreed. I don't know why people think it's okay for some innocent person's life to be wrecked and have the guilty person suffer equal or lesser consequences.
/r/MensRights14/01/12 10:21 PM
2

What a tremendous piece of shit.
/r/MensRights11/01/12 12:04 AM
3

Exactly. What a disgrace.
/r/MensRights31/12/11 02:32 AM
3

A room full of people complicit in your sexual assault and regular assault. What an infuriating story.
/r/MensRights26/12/11 04:52 AM
17

It's a complicated issue, but one thing that sticks out to me here is that at least some of the time, this "nice guy" meme is just a Just World Fallacy. A woman sees a guy who conforms to the things they say they want in a man and treats her well, but lacks confidence and forcefulness and all the other primal things women are actually attracted to, and so is not attracted to him (perhaps even though she realizes that she "should" be, going by her own stated criteria). This needs an explanation t…
/r/MensRights22/12/11 08:45 PM
9

No one who describes the children they care for as "rapists" and talks explicitly about how they regret taking care of these children because they are male, should ever be allowed to work with children at a daycare. And it's a similar case with people working at universities, municipalities, etc. In cases like this people have an ethical responsibility to inform the relevant employers and the public they are supposed to serve about what kind of dangerous people they have in their employ.
/r/MensRights22/12/11 12:16 AM
2

Three years is not nearly enough for this ape. If you claim the right to violence, you take the full responsibility for that violence. I'm willing to be convinced otherwise, but I don't think this asshole should be treated any differently than someone who beat someone else at random. Because that is what he did. If you don't want to take the risk that your drunken, macho, egotistical perceptions of the World don't align with reality and allow you to do something abominable, than don't fucking as…
/r/MensRights15/12/11 08:22 PM
2

Sick fucks.
/r/MensRights15/12/11 06:55 AM
1

Peer pressure is something everyone has to deal with. It's the force that slows down progress and holds together bad systems and debunked ideas, and it's what good people have always had to overcome. The only advice I can give you is to do what you believe is right. I definitely don't think making sure good fathers have the ability to take care of their children conflicts with what you've experienced. If parents of both genders are given the chance to take care of their children, then the good p…
/r/MensRights13/12/11 12:03 PM
6

That's great news. If you are attacked you have a moral responsibility to ensure your safety, not the safety of the criminals. Victims should be given every reasonable benefit of doubt when it comes to their self-defense, and continuing to defend one's self from two unknown aggressors, who attacked you without provocation, and who possibly have weapons, until they completely submit, rather than stop simply because the aggressors are temporarily off their feet, is within that area of reasonable s…
/r/MensRights03/12/11 07:37 AM
3

Right you are, I didn't notice him admonishing the guy on my first watch, that is lame. I just appreciated that he acknowledged that a woman is capable of domestic violence and that it is unacceptable.
/r/MensRights02/12/11 05:48 AM
3

The commentary was surprisingly aware and insightful.
/r/MensRights02/12/11 01:49 AM
2

Sounds good to me, at least with the cursory look I gave the article. In terms of the reduced rights they have and the burdens they bear, women in the Third World are comparable to men in the West in some ways, as far as such a comparison is even possible. They definitely don't have many similarities with women living in the West, despite the attempts of western feminists to co-opt their suffering.
/r/MensRights27/11/11 04:41 AM
4

What the fuck is this
/r/MensRights24/11/11 06:02 PM
11

Utterly disgusting.
/r/MensRights23/11/11 06:26 AM
2

I agree with Nick entirely for recognizing that people should be free to do what they want with what is theirs. If those interested in Men's Rights consider this a worthwhile issue, then they should use the power of their feet, words, and wallets to rectify the situation. However, I think there is also an argument for using a corrupt system against itself to bring down that system, by utilizing these misguided forced equality measures.
/r/MensRights23/11/11 06:23 AM
3

What planet are you living on?
/r/MensRights20/11/11 11:04 AM
3

None of what you've posted here makes sense. Because racism is taboo, "men of all races are defended from prejudice before us"? That makes zero sense. And the assertion you make in your second paragraph makes no sense either. Why? Why does it follow that people getting more upset about the word 'Nigger' then the word 'Bitch' means what you claim it does? You seem to be making all sorts of weird red herrings, and your core argument changes even from sentence to sentence. And these are just the gl…
/r/MensRights20/11/11 11:00 AM
3

Uh, people do have issues with sexist slurs. What's more, it makes little sense to me that you are asking why racial and religious slurs are taken seriously but (according to you) sexist slurs aren't, because racial and religious slurs being taken seriously are the exception to the rule - as far as I can tell most slurs aren't taken seriously at all, there are a million different more or less "acceptable" ways to be called ugly for instance. Many qualities of a person can be used as targets to m…
/r/MensRights20/11/11 10:44 AM
5

This doesn't seem to have anything to do with Men's Rights.
/r/MensRights19/11/11 10:48 AM
5

Holy crap, what a scumbag.
/r/MensRights19/11/11 03:43 AM
7

You get my upvote for showing up and being cordial.
/r/MensRights18/11/11 10:49 AM
8

Okay, this made me laugh.
/r/MensRights18/11/11 10:47 AM
3

Poignant and dignified. I wonder what it means that one of the main demographics youtube reports as watching this video are women in their 30s and early 40s.
/r/MensRights18/11/11 10:32 AM
7

You should write a letter to this guy's boss. He's an ass to think less of you for not kowtowing to outdated chivalry, but more importantly he's totally out of line to speak to a paying member of the public in that way.
/r/MensRights17/11/11 07:25 AM
2

"1. A gentleman may not injure a woman or, through inaction, allow a woman to come to harm. 2. A gentleman must obey the orders given to it by women, except where such orders would conflict with the First Law. 3. A gentleman must protect its own existence as long as such protection does not conflict with the First or Second Laws."
/r/MensRights11/11/11 04:15 AM
8

Pretty subpar troll. 2/10
/r/MensRights09/11/11 08:53 AM
7

I would say men do it very rarely compared to women, yet usually seem to be the ones blamed for it. We like women that like sex.
/r/MensRights09/11/11 03:51 AM
8

This is the real slut shaming. Women slut shame each other, that is, they bully each other for wanting to have sex, and then they slut shame the men that want to have sex with them, because the male slur for someone who wants to have sex isn't slut, it's creep. Of course, that slur has a lot of other uses too.
/r/MensRights09/11/11 02:39 AM
2

I really appreciated your post, gills.
/r/MensRights08/11/11 10:05 AM
1

What I mean is that people, law-makers and police included, can say 'oh you got victimized because X', because doing this is easier and less troubling than recognizing that X should be safe and working to make it so.
/r/MensRights07/11/11 11:21 PM
6

There are two completely correct sides to this thing, and they need to be carefully accommodated. People deserve to know how best to defend themselves from criminals, but they also deserve to not be blamed for being victimized - only the criminals deserve blame. There is a danger that society can emphasize ways in which potential victims need to alter their behavior, instead of emphasizing the need to make criminals alter their behavior. There is also the possibility that we can unthinkingly con…
/r/MensRights07/11/11 05:28 AM
45

Why would anyone read or care about r/srs?
/r/MensRights06/11/11 11:27 AM
6

The quotes in that article are vomit inducing.
/r/MensRights04/11/11 11:26 AM
3

You hit the nail on the head.
/r/MensRights04/11/11 08:49 AM
1

Damn right there is.
/r/MensRights04/11/11 08:44 AM
1

I don't even know what this is supposed to mean.
/r/MensRights04/11/11 06:48 AM
2

I'm sorry but the science isn't with you, certainly not on the whole and as far as I can tell not even on the health care point that you have focused on. I did exactly what you asked in regards to your point on health care and found no preponderance of evidence in favour of your claim that women are discriminated against in healthcare. And I've read more than enough to know that the wage disparity myth has been thoroughly debunked. I'm not sure what your comment about slut walks has to do anythi…
/r/MensRights03/11/11 06:21 AM
1

You sound like a well-intentioned guy but you've internalized a lot of things that are just not true. Men do not gain more from the prejudices of society than we lose. I'll address the two points you made. Firstly, women are not discriminated against in health care, men are: It has been proven that they receive poorer health care than women, and even poorer health care still if they are unmarried or without a family. They receive a fraction of the spending women do for diseases that affect them.…
/r/MensRights03/11/11 12:38 AM
2

This guy rules.
/r/MensRights02/11/11 08:18 PM
10

What is this shit doing in Men's Rights? I don't care that someone on facebook made a lame joke and then someone else made another lame joke and then some retards in a lame forum got upset about it or whatever.
/r/MensRights31/10/11 07:41 AM
0

No, of course not. Exactly what is entailed in this right to not be "emotionally abused" that you believe exists? Should people be arrested or sued because the things they said made someone feel sad? How does this right to not be "emotionally abuse" override the right to free speech? You don't have the right to infringe on the rights of others because what they do makes you feel bad. You do have the right to cut contact with them. Of course, you haven't even explained which human rights are over…
/r/MensRights27/10/11 05:11 AM
1

No actually you don't. If you believe you are being emotionally abused you have the right to cut contact with the person you believe is abusing you. You don't have the right to kill them, sue them, or anything else. You're recourse is your own free will to live how you want to.
/r/MensRights27/10/11 02:49 AM
0

It is that simply actually. That's the central point of modern, liberal civilization: You have the right to not be physically harmed by others, you don't have the right to have your feelings not be hurt. Furthermore, you can't cite someone "manipulating" your feelings as an excuse to kill them any more than you can cite someone putting a hex on you as reason to burn them at the stake. If someone is threatening physical violence against you, you can have a restraining order put against them or ha…
/r/MensRights27/10/11 01:09 AM
-3

Basically, yes. He was made into a "creep" because of his gender, his sexual activity, and a single accusation, was dehumanized, and had his career destroyed. I'd be hard pressed to think of a way in which a mishandled false rape accusation couldn't involve creep shaming. Why don't you find it relevant?
/r/MensRights26/10/11 05:41 AM
1

Off the top of my head the case with Strauss-Kahn is an example. That was a straight-up false rape accusation but it falls under the umbrella of creep shaming. A man who was a favourite to be the next President of France was arrested and had his career derailed probably beyond repair, simply because he was known to enjoy sex and was accused of rape by a criminal. If you want a more mundane example I went back a few pages in Mens Rights and found this: http://www.reddit.com/r/self/comments/lmbq2/…
/r/MensRights26/10/11 05:16 AM
1

I agree but I don't think that's what anyone's talking about. There are legitimate creeps. Creep shaming is when the label is used to belittle and provoke violence against people who aren't.
/r/MensRights26/10/11 05:04 AM
1

I thought that was pretty self-explanatory but okay: Because they can have the cops called on them, be beaten up in bars by white knights, be fired from their jobs, etc, on unfounded accusations and for doing nothing wrong.
/r/MensRights26/10/11 05:00 AM
5

Creep shaming is much worse than slut shaming because creep shaming is to some extent a call for vigilante violence or police intervention against the person in question. Of course the concept of creep shaming doesn't apply to people who are acting legitimately creepy and has nothing to do with them, but it's so much easier to dismiss if you pretend like it is.
/r/MensRights26/10/11 12:04 AM
29

A cold blooded, brutal, attempted murder, and she is charged with "domestic violence". Absolutely disgusting.
/r/MensRights18/10/11 12:34 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter