TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

r0tekatze Archive

View 1 post and 46 comments by r0tekatze on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
54

Activism/Supportr0tekatze/r/MensRights19/02/18 05:00 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
-1

This isn't that simple. Let's say you have a problem with meth. Sure, that's shitty, and you've probably done some low things to get a fix. Meth is incredibly addictive, now you can't function without it. You're out of cash one day, and someone offers you a fix for a bang. Sounds great, right? You're addled enough by this point that the potential consequences don't even reach you, so you take the deal and get the fix. When you miss your next period, you don't think much of it because they're a b…
/r/PussyPass29/12/18 03:37 AM
-26

No, I'm not missing the point at all. What you're describing is not feminism, it is the misuse of feminism as class warfare. Upper class "dignitaries" did indeed misuse the idea of feminism to reinforce a pre-existing societal structure, but this misuse is not solely the blame of women, or of so-called "upper-tier feminism". It can easily be attributed to a filter-down effect of upper class lifestyle and morals, which is completely different. Yes, modern feminism still carries quite a few of the…
/r/MensRights27/10/18 11:32 AM
49

It's not a question of being maintained, it's a question of choice. Had they wanted to work, or to be independent, or to vote or be skilled in certain professions, they would not have been allowed to. The men who wanted to stay at home and be the homemakers would also have been considered lazy or wasted. These sorts of issues are as a result of a society that expects roles to be assigned based on sex, rather than on skillset or ambition, and it affects both women and men. Just because we can emp…
/r/MensRights27/10/18 09:49 AM
15

As much as I hate this, don't distance yourself. What your ex wife has done here is very narcissistic, and your son may eventually need your support. If you're there for him now, he'll know where he can turn when he really, really needs help.
/r/PussyPassDenied14/10/18 02:29 PM
8

I can't stand this. This comments section is filled with people who can't be bothered to read the entire article, which goes into a great deal about this particular tutor, and about how others in the same position as they could abuse their positions. It is a well balanced, highly researched article, yet everyone here is focused on "Hurr durr the woman did bad". That mindset is why we don't get taken seriously. It is the mindset that jumps to the same victim-complex basis as the complete opposite…
/r/PussyPassDenied28/08/18 09:48 PM
0

BPAS, Marie Stopes, etc offer vasectomies irrespective of age. You can also request a doctor outside of your normal area. If it really comes down to it, have some sperm preserved as a "just in case" and bring the certification to the consultation. Afterwards you can just as easily have them destroyed.
/r/MensRights14/08/18 08:18 PM
1

Yes, I quite agree that it creates bureaucracy around sex that isn't needed. That said, I would like to see a more balanced stance on consent being taken, as a man one might feel compelled to go through with the deed when it's offered, even in the case where one might not wish to do so. Not that there are women in the same boat, of course, but I see little to no action being taken on behalf of the men in the same situations.
/r/MensRights24/05/18 06:38 AM
1

Now that I've had a day to think on it, I somewhat understand the stance taken. It's not something I agree with, still, but bearing in mind that the ways in which we communicate are changing quite rapidly it doesn't surprise or shock me that there are more people following this line of thought - and I don't begrudge them it either.
/r/MensRights23/05/18 08:27 PM
2

That's oversimplifying an intimate relationship. A relationship doesn't imply that either partner can grope the other at any given point, neither that sex is assumed on a constant basis. However, consent can be defined in more than one manner. Let's assume that two people share a bed. On getting into bed, one person initiates contact with the other - lets say the sort of mouth to mouth contact you might expect before sex. That other person's reaction to contact can be used as an indicator to whe…
/r/MensRights23/05/18 11:32 AM
3

I would have imagined in most relationships the idea of assumed (or at least suggested) consent is logical, since the two (or two + x) people have agreed to share lives in an intimate fashion. That's obviously not going to be true in every relationship, and context is key. However, I wouldn't have said that extends to groping. It extends, at least in my opinion, to making one's intentions clear in a more intimate fashion than one would otherwise.
/r/MensRights23/05/18 09:49 AM
-48

That's a bit reaching. There's a significant difference between wearing revealing clothes and forging a signature.
/r/MensRights03/05/18 08:48 PM
2

This. Grown adults acting like children, whilst the blue collar workers who get the brunt of it all are the ones to clean up after them. Grow the fuck up, this isn't PPD. This is schoolyard antics.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/04/18 10:31 PM
3

I'll be the first to admit, this wasn't something I was really properly aware of, at least in the sense that it was what the phrase "gender pay gap" was alluding to. I've been wondering for a while, though - if we can successfully maintain a relatively equal educational experience for both girls and boys, and then present roughly the same opportunities to each, what would happen if a similar gap still existed? Can we account for the differences in biological imperative, or for fitness requiremen…
/r/MensRights08/04/18 06:25 PM
6

Out of interest, what justified you starting on $9ph where others started at $8ph?
/r/MensRights08/04/18 06:16 PM
3

No, that's just what the average thirty year old looks like in Byker.
/r/PussyPass04/04/18 09:03 PM
0

What really bugs me about this is that it doesn't achieve anything. We have certain principles in place in society because a small number of people misuse the principle of being a member of the sex other than what one is biologically to misbehave around others. What would have been a better alternative here is encouragement of the local authority to figure out where and when it is possible to open up a private area for swimmers who are transitionary m-f, and transitionary f-m. Yes, this does cos…
/r/MensRights18/03/18 05:51 PM
2

I'm not sure that's really the way forward, though. If you consider that the number of women in positions of power certainly seems to be slowly coming to a balance with the number of men, the direction one should be moving in is that in which we petition society, rather than sit around discussing blame. We're already hyper-aware of the sex-imbalance of history, and whilst that must not be forgotten I don't think it does much good to use it as an explanation on a constant basis. One other thing y…
/r/MensRights08/03/18 05:41 PM
8

Consider an argument I made here not so long ago: Men are often looked down upon for wanting to be stay-at-home parents or house husbands. Women are often looked down upon for wanting to return to work soon after having children. Both of these points stem from an aggregate view of a typical household and what might be "right" and "proper". You might argue that these problems stem from a common cause, so to speak. Here in this subreddit, we empathise more with the man in the scenario, because tha…
/r/MensRights08/03/18 03:25 PM
24

I'm glad there's people like you around. The neckbeard conversation that goes on here sometimes is depressing.
/r/MensRights08/03/18 03:20 PM
1

My first amendment? I have a queen and a parliament!
/r/MensRights19/02/18 10:09 PM
1

If the book were simply discussing the author's desire to commit these actions, without instructing on the process, I would too. However, I do not believe in the idea of "ultimate free speech", where one is allowed to make statements encouraging listeners to commit violence against others. I'd argue for the right, for example, for a person to make this statement: "I don't like Americans. They're fat and stupid." That statement, whilst not exactly true, is an opinion. I consider it a right for an…
/r/MensRights19/02/18 08:19 PM
0

Free speech doesn't really cover this, because it's incitement. It's deliberately instructing on the methodology behind committing a crime. Mein Kampf, although controversial, is far more auto-biographical than it is instructional. Not to mention, there is a historical need for documentation on immoral leaders.
/r/MensRights19/02/18 08:00 PM
11

I hope the do remove it. Leaving the listing there (or at least, allowing the product to still be sold) sends a statement that these actions are acceptable - which they most certainly are not.
/r/MensRights19/02/18 05:11 AM
1

You can't cannonball that sort of thing. Furthermore, you're implying that all "accidental" pregnancies are, in fact, deliberate, which is an opinion better kept to /r/redpill.
/r/MensRights12/02/18 04:46 PM
2

We have a similar system set up, however these systems would likely not meet such requirements. Additionally, there often isn't much in the way of emotional or moral support for a single parent, which I consider a failing in most western societies.
/r/MensRights11/02/18 01:09 PM
2

I doubt it would affect birthrate by a significant amount. Our biological imperatives will always exist, at least until science finds a way to overcome them.
/r/MensRights11/02/18 01:07 PM
2

You shouldn't have a kid without a willing father at your site. Oo-er... I don't know that I agree entirely with this one. Certainly a childhood with equal input from both father and mother is ideal, but does that mean it's right to make single parentage offensive? I'm not so sure - how many would be ostracised through no fault of their own? This argument is only ever acceptable... No, I don't agree. I was entirely against the military in my country potentially lowering fitness requirements for …
/r/MensRights11/02/18 01:07 PM
35

I don't think we, as a collection of societies, are at all mature enough to be making the right decisions on this. The points of contention are: When a foetus is conceived, it is only carried by one parent. The other parent is not (necessarily) physically impacted. Where the conception is by means of sexual congress, contraception is the responsibility of both partakers. The third party (the child) is innocent of crime and wrongdoing. Parenthood is a long commitment, financially, physically and …
/r/MensRights11/02/18 04:33 AM
2

Your argument relies on the following: Previous conclusions by researchers are irrefutable and exact; Those conclusions are supported by insurmountable evidence; I am willing supporting a false conclusion; Tradition is precise over thousands of years and is correct. Research is always reliant on sourcing data. Those sources can easily be biased, or may not exist at all. Therefore, some conclusions must be gained by observing patterns in research and distinguishing what is reliable and what is no…
/r/MensRights29/01/18 05:51 PM
1

I treat this conversation as having concluded already This is the problem that a great many people face - someone unwilling to listen to further reinforcements to an argument because they simply disagree with the argument in the first place. This is the emotional "cloud" of which you speak, or at least that's my interpretation of the same. Your argument is very similar to naysayers of feminism at it's birth - "It'll just create more problems". Yes, I accept that campaigning or advocating for men…
/r/MensRights29/01/18 03:46 PM
0

/u/duhhhh counters you very aptly. I don't think your description of "binary thinking" is very apt in this case at all. I already mentioned earlier that both MRA and feminist representations have common ground, and that many problems stem from the same causes. You might even accept that we should all be banding together to make those positive changes that improve the social representation of both men and women. This is distinctly egalitarian action - and there's nothing wrong with representative…
/r/MensRights29/01/18 03:18 PM
1

You missed my point by a mile. No, we don't need more male feminists. We need more men's rights advocates who are open to accepting that both sides of the coin have various problems. We need fewer neckbeards proclaiming "hurr durr women r bad". Feminism does not have the male agenda at heart. That goes against the definition of feminism. The definition of feminism is the approach and action of members with the eventual goal of equal rights for women. Representing the male agenda thus cannot be f…
/r/MensRights29/01/18 09:54 AM
17

Whilst on the whole I agree with you, I would refrain from encouraging men to be feminists purely for the sake of men's rights. Many of the issues that both MRA and feminist communities bring up stem from root issues that affect both parties, so to describe them "feminists" as a whole group I think detracts from the importance and relevance of the problems that they cause men. Note that I don't intend to insult any man who describes themself as feminist, nor woman who describes themself as a sup…
/r/MensRights28/01/18 08:14 PM
9

This isn't a PPD, and let me explain why: Prior to 1995, the legal retirement age in the UK differed between men and women. This was brought up numerous times in parliament because the number of people receiving a state pension was burdening the government pocket heavily, and research showed that men and women were able to work reasonably equally to a reasonably equal age. So, in 1995, legislation was passed that upped the retirement age of women to bring it in line with that of men. In itself, …
/r/PussyPassDenied16/12/17 11:01 PM
1

You're implying that teenagers need to take part in league level competition. They don't - this is an introduction to sport, not a career. It's ridiculous to follow this methodology because sports will inevitably be dropped due to low turnout in one gender. What if there were no girls golfing equivalent? That would be unfair. You have a point regarding differences in hand-eye co-ordination between genders, but you're vastly oversimplifying it. The causes and affecting factors are not simply "men…
/r/PussyPassDenied28/10/17 09:47 PM
1

Because it's golf. There's no more reason to segregate a sport like golf than there is to segregate men and women in the workplace. Segregation implies a disparity where little disparity exists - and enforcing it leads to a droop in results. Look at the difference in football (or soccer) - the many millions that go into clubs, even the multinational companies that do their utmost to get publicity from the sport. Look at NUFC - NTL were plastered all over their kit for years. The female equivalen…
/r/PussyPassDenied28/10/17 08:08 PM
-3

OK, this isn't PPD. This isn't even tumblrinaction here, it's stupidity in bureaucracy. We have gender separation for contact sports such as rugby and football, because of two reasons: It removes the possibility of sexual assault in-play; At the time of introduction, female players were far less likely to be physically equal in stature and build to male players. Golf is not a contact sport. It is a sport with a heavy focus on accuracy, estimation, strategy, etc. It's fucking golf. There is littl…
/r/PussyPassDenied28/10/17 03:22 PM
-2

If this is the case, then the victim is obviously overly trusting, or perhaps has some other issues that we're not aware of. Nevertheless, it does not mean that it was at all acceptable for the perpetrator to take advantage of her in such a manner.
/r/PussyPassDenied26/07/17 07:33 PM
0

"Into the wild", yes, but not to someone whom you know, or at least think you know.
/r/PussyPassDenied26/07/17 07:31 PM
4

You could easily say the same of people who send nude pictures of themselves to others, under the impression that they're for personal enjoyment. Then, you get people like Hunter Moore.
/r/PussyPassDenied26/07/17 06:53 PM
21

I heartily disagree with this sentiment. The nature of this crime demonstrates that the perpetrator is an extremely manipulative person, and bearing in mind that the victim was still considerably young at the time and possibly not emotionally mature enough to allay this possibility, I would argue that it is the perpetrator that needs the psychoanalysis.
/r/PussyPassDenied26/07/17 03:02 PM
1

I disagree. That implies that lack of evidence is enough to imply that an allegation is malicious, which would potentially result in cases where evidence is hidden being deliberately warped and resulting in serious miscarriages of justice. False allegations would absolutely need evidence to prove their intent, and in this case there simply isn't any.
/r/PussyPassDenied07/07/17 09:44 PM
1

There's definitely collusion, but no apparent, definitive proof that it was malicious and untrue. Again, we don't have these social media messages to prove anything, so the most we can do is speculate that a group of persons might have sought to have the defendant punished more so than was legally possible at the time.
/r/PussyPassDenied07/07/17 02:01 PM
1

A sexual assault doesn't necessarily imply that a sex act was completed, merely that one was potentially attempted (a blow to the testicles is not a sexual act in most cases, but is still sexual assault). There's no proof, other than some cropped screenshots of text, that these allegations were malicious in nature - neither have they necessarily been proven to be true, which is why the charges were quite minimal. The fact remains that this video was unnecessarily provocative in nature, implying …
/r/PussyPassDenied07/07/17 01:39 PM
2

Do some research. The defendant plead guilty to three counts of sexual assault and three counts of child abuse, in January of this year. At the same time, the county sheriff has been accused of using this case for grandstanding purposes. This allegation of conspiracy was published in 2015, and this video misrepresents the facts as being relevant now.
/r/PussyPassDenied07/07/17 11:10 AM
1

I'm not sure I entirely agree at this point. I think that the definition of Feminism should really be construed as "A general approach to equality with a focus on women's rights". There are still a lot of valid points raised within feminism, despite the extremist side or "radical feminism", and similarly there are valid points to be made by men's rights activists. There are those whom also have a drive to work for both "sides" of the coin, and they would fall under the definition of egalitarian …
/r/PussyPassDenied24/05/17 07:29 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter