TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

rEvolutionTU Archive

View 0 posts and 42 comments by rEvolutionTU on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

It's not a great choice. It's an okay and simple choice like pretty much any well known brand that you can get easily at your local stores. It works in a pinch, for mixes and it won't kill you but it won't excite anyone. A great choice is something that people remember for a while and not because of the headaches. It also needs to taste great while served pure on ice. This for example is my personal choice of Vodka and it's also sold rather cheaply in the US it seems. Can also recommend the Blac…
/r/seduction22/11/16 06:36 PM
2

Small addition since from experience I'd say that 1) is really hard to pull off without practice for quite a few people: Grab a buddy who wants to practice with you, both of you start telling a story to each other at the same time (content is utterly irrelevant, squirrels riding hot air balloons are fine) and do not stop. Repeat until you feel as if you could do this for minutes if you'd have to. Pauses, long breaks to catch your breath, raising your voice or excessive gesturing are no-goes duri…
/r/seduction07/11/16 02:16 PM
2

It's been a few years since I've gone out and worked with with actual pickup cats, but I'm seeing a few basic things here that might help you out. Pick your goals and be consistent about them. Do you want to (or will you have to?) be buddies with those 3 other women you mention? Whether yes or no this will determine a lot of how you need to act. Personally I'd rather recommend getting along with them on at least a superficial level which means de-escalating most scenarios instead of more aggress…
/r/seduction06/11/16 04:41 PM
0

Scholarships in some ways incentivize certain populations to attend college. To me that's a flawed idea in the first place. Select by merit, blind the application process to remove bias (e.g. gender/religion/sexuality should not be known to the people making the selection), done. If the issue is that too few people from a certain population come through a system like that compared to an 'equal' representation based on numbers then you need to take a look at whatever came before the application. …
/r/MensRights15/10/16 11:09 AM
1

i should only use text for making plans right? That's something you need to figure out for yourself. Some people have success with texting, some with calling exclusively. Either is fine as long as it gets you towards the desired result. it was not clear that it was a date or something sexual/romantic. She probably saw it as a friend thing Also fine if you know how to escalate from there. For me a flake without excuse is a huge deal and happens rarely nowadays. Absolute no-go for me. If you exper…
/r/seduction16/08/16 01:17 PM
8

"Hey, do you have any idea how much a polar bear weighs?" - "???" - "Enough to... break. the. ice. Ha! No? Well, shit. Hi, I'm ..." "Meow!" - "???" - "What? You never meow at people you want to talk to? You're weird. Hi, I'm ..." The issue is that asking what someone said is almost completely pointless because it can literally be anything. What matters, especially in this context, is that it's weird enough that it causes confusion and breaks up her current routine without being threatening or cr…
/r/seduction07/08/16 07:01 AM
7

Not OP but what he's describing is pretty much your run of the mill state break. In this specific case (since it is used as a straight up part of the introduction) it, in theory, directly associates a strong memory with getting to know the person while simultaneously interrupting whatever thoughtprocess or emotional state the person currently has. It also, if done well, can set up you leading the person into some kind of "bubble" with just you two. A lot of the super direct approaches bank on ex…
/r/seduction07/08/16 05:03 AM
0

The trick is that all that invested energy is wasted if you just cut contact like that. To stick with the nomenclature it doesn't take much energy to maintain a casual relationship and it can open up all kinds of doors. A year or so after I started out or so I began friend zoning the vast majority of women I ended up meeting and the results got crazy rather fast, mostly because every established relationship opens you ten potential relationships with people that are already way closer to what yo…
/r/seduction10/07/16 06:51 AM
2

He needs to hear that he needs to be a 10 to get even a 5. If you want that to be true for yourself, all the more power to you. No reason to spread your personal limiting beliefs to people who don't seem to have them however.
/r/seduction10/07/16 06:45 AM
7

Confidence is a result of competence. Competence is a result of experience. Quite literally going out and doing stuff is one of the fastest ways to gain confidence through competence. The more you push your own boundaries the faster it's going to go.
/r/seduction05/07/16 01:45 AM
5

It's maybe a bit nitpicky but since this is one of my favorite areas: She's not supposed to see you as a sexual partner but as a sexual person in general. The idea is that you can be the person to friendzone her early and quickly if need be while still being an attractive, confident man to her. As for putting that to practice it basically includes (like most things) doing everything you'd do if she was your best male buddy while she's around. Be physical. Box her gently during jokes. Flirt with …
/r/seduction05/07/16 01:41 AM
2

After putting years into this area there was a point at which I genuinely realized that "you just gotta be confident" was actually the right answer all along. But just because something like that is the right answer doesn't mean it's a good answer for someone who isn't there yet. Some people need simple pointers, some need years of practice and lots of detailed guidance. Either is fine, there's no reason to judge others who need more or less help than you do/did.
/r/seduction05/07/16 01:32 AM
4

It's not that hard to integrate it into your daily routines. Pretty much anything you buy with people in the vicinity is a situational opener right there in front of you. Every time you walk from A to B with people in the area there are dozens of opportunities to approach someone. If you've been doing "day game for a year" and can count how many people you had better conversations with you didn't want to put the time and effort into it to pursue it further. Don't get me wrong it's absolutely up …
/r/seduction05/07/16 01:28 AM
16

5 links to your own site in the last 30 days and 9 total posts on this subreddit. Why not at least post the actual content in a self post unless you're doing this just for clicks?
/r/seduction21/05/16 10:37 AM
1

It's a yes/no kind of thing. If she likes how the guy looks/delivers it will continue, if she doesn't it won't. There's no possible edge to gain/lose with that kind of opening if that makes more sense. Direct: "Hey, I just saw you from over there and just had to get over here and talk to you. I think you're really damn cute and I'd like to get to know you better. Hi, I'm X." Core concepts: Anchoring ("Saw you from over there"), motivation ("had to", "I would have bitten myself in my ass later if…
/r/seduction20/05/16 01:29 PM
1

I'd like to know how the UK guys here open with girls. Exactly the same as anywhere in the western world that I've seen. Indirect or direct? Pick one. Long term you want to get familiar with both but short term either works. Your actual text should come from the mindset of these two things. Think of the direct mindset as "I'm choosing you as the person I'd like to get to know better because you're attractive to me and that's why you're already attracted to me." where the indirect mindset starts …
/r/seduction20/05/16 12:31 PM
1

Even some of the advice about how to approach girls in bars and stuff that some of the US guys suggest would completely creep out lots of UK girls This happens when you apply the actual literal advice and not the concepts behind it. Most specific advice is meant for specific situations, for specific people in specific stages but the ideas that drive it are the same for everyone. This doesn't make it bad it just makes it specific and should be understood as such. These kind of issues are fixed ra…
/r/seduction20/05/16 12:21 PM
1

Yeah, I would avoid the 'yer purdy' bit. Most beautiful women get that a lot from guys and the idea is to stand out from the rest. This is totally fine if it works for you but not something set in stone at all. A guy walking up to a woman he doesn't know, telling her he finds her attractive and he'd like to get to know her does stand out. A strong, honest and no-bullshit direct approach is just as valid as an indirect one, different things for different people and situations.
/r/seduction20/05/16 12:09 PM
4

The question is why people expect demographic representation in the first place. Because if you have two groups of 50 people each then equality has to mean that they're going to split 50:50 on every single issue in existence. ...right? God that approach annoys me so much. In reality the more equal various groups are in terms of their rights and possibilities they have the more bias from natural inclinations will come into play. We need to ask whether certain unequal results are completely reason…
/r/MensRights18/04/16 09:41 PM
8

I usually hear "You're totally not my type" and "I don't usually do this kind of thing", rip dreams.
/r/seduction03/04/16 01:26 PM
1

If you say that the mods can't be wrong by definition, then ... I don't know what to tell you. I didn't and you know I didn't so this is pretty pointless at this stage. My point is that the place to challenge a decision is via PM to another mod, modmail or [Meta] threads. Not a random thread where you were just told to stop discussing it. Think it's bad that a mod told you to stop a discussion? PM a different one, use modmail. These topics are part of a subs own rules (their place, their rules) …
/r/MensRights20/03/16 07:44 PM
-1

It's saying that the mod's perspective deserves to be out in public, unchallenged, while the alleged rule-breaker's perspective does not. Yes and that will be the case in most places and I even would say that's a good thing. When the mod says its over, it's over. If you think his application of the rule or the rule itself was a spot where you were wronged that's a place to PM another mod, message the mods in general or make a [Meta] post about the rule itself if the sub allows it. Arguing right …
/r/MensRights20/03/16 05:28 PM
-1

To me, NO, the "job" of the moderator is not to enforce a "only comment if you agree with this topic". I did not argue that point, I agree with it in general. Unless when it comes to actual rules that are being enforced. Rule discussions don't belong in random threads. Stating the rule, expanding on it and then declaring the discussion as over is completely acceptable imo. Make a thread discussing the rule if you really care about it.
/r/MensRights20/03/16 03:23 PM
-5

to act as much as an objective person to keep the peace and keep the topic on topic as much as possible Part of which includes enforcing rules. If indeed invalidation is against their rules he first stated that the rule was violated, expanded on this in the 2nd response and declared the topic over. I probably grew up in a much tighter moderated community than most of reddit but for me the mod decisions are completely in line here. The rule itself and the interpretation of it is, from my point of…
/r/MensRights20/03/16 01:04 PM
-5

That's not the point he was trying to make. It might be because I'm used to forums that have this as one of their core rules but a user saying "Ban me if that's a big deal" is a pretty easy case of just smacking the hammer. You told him you don't care about what he perceives as a rulebreak and that's unacceptable. A ban for that doesn't even have to have anything to do with the point you're disputing in the first place. Just so we're clear, my issue with this is that while I fully agree with you…
/r/MensRights20/03/16 09:51 AM
2

...you do realize that supports my viewpoint, not yours right? It's about being pro-women on the basis of equal rights. In this definition the end goal has come to be not in equal rights, they are the means to justify a pro-female movement. This is great and all but it, again, does not include egalitarianism in it's definition. ...so pretty much like all the above -isms are defined. The definition you saw there (even though that's not what it says) and which I commonly see it framed as is among …
/r/MensRights20/03/16 09:34 AM
5

Please tell me what I'm missing. Racism isn't about believing that your race should be equal to others. Sexism isn't about believing that your sex should be equal to others. Alcoholism is about being addicted to alcohol. A criticism is about the critique, not the nice words. Stoicism is about stoic people. ...since you "choose to follow the English language definition", why is "feminism" not about, well, females? Equality is, by definition, not included in that definition.
/r/MensRights19/03/16 03:01 PM
6

Not him, but hell, yeah! Why not? What annoys me personally like there's no tomorrow is all the judgmental crap from people that project their worldview onto everyone and everything. I hold doors open because I think it's a nice gesture. I do it because I genuinely believe that if everyone does it the world would be a bit nicer place. If then a woman complains that I somehow tried to make her my inferior with that gesture then that problem is in her head, not mine. What about just accepting that…
/r/MensRights19/03/16 02:51 PM
10

I think you are talking about guys that just want sex. It's the motivation that shines through an action that matters. "...and then I got her a drink" in itself is completely neutral. The "nice guy" OP talks about asks the girl if she wants a drink, gets up and buys one for her. The idea behind the action is that doing "something nice" for her is something she will appreciate. He does what he does because the outcome he is looking for is scoring more points with the woman. The alternative is, fo…
/r/seduction13/02/16 05:59 AM
4

The other way to handle this kind of situation, just to give OP multiple ideas, would be to simply acknowledge the awkwardness and/or nervousness and work with it. If done right admitting that you don't do this kind of thing often ("Yeah, right!") or that this feels a bit awkward now are totally alright. Hell, I even had success by going full out with things like asking her if she'd find it weird if I'd just ask for her number to take her out at day X, since, again, I don't do this all the time …
/r/seduction12/04/15 04:00 AM
2

Seduction rule #1: Most of the time (*) someone says "always" or "never" they're wrong and are either lying to you for your benefit or aren't experienced enough themselves. As /u/Ho_Kogan mentioned, a lot of things are fair game. Girl has headphones in? Gesture to get her attention, gesture for her to take it off and, after telling her you're sorry for intruding like that, tell her why you really had to talk to her. Continue based on her reaction. Or just tell her a story anyway because you felt…
/r/seduction25/03/15 10:48 AM
1

That conversations build comfort is a pretty commonly accepted theory, yeah. =P In most cases you don't need much of that to work towards a "real" date but what I'm getting at is that you can still do much more than the bare minimum and be successful in the end. It's really up to you and your preferences. From practice there is technically a point of "too much comfort" (basically what people refer to as friendzones) but that's nothing a strong, sexual frame can't resolve. However I don't recomme…
/r/seduction07/03/15 12:34 AM
6

It comes down to whether you can transition from "an interesting conversation". If you can have fun together during a long conversation can you escalate that to a date (should be pretty easy) and can you then escalate that date sexually? If yes, awesome! Realizing that my issue was fucking up the actual date (and not during the period that lead up to it) was immensely helpful to me because it extends to all areas. It kind of becomes part of your screening process. Depending on how much experienc…
/r/seduction06/03/15 11:37 PM
39

I'd like to chime in here because it turned into a bit of a pet peeve of mine over the years (the other being people scared of "friendzones" while I turned them into one of my strongest tools). Comparatively neutral actions in itself (e.g. texting, talking on the phone, bringing the girl a drink, holding her bag) are pretty much never bad. Not even when you do them a lot or even when you always do them. What makes them bad (and why even I recommend being careful around them as a "beginner") is d…
/r/seduction06/03/15 08:58 PM
3

Think of shit tests less as "something women do" but try and look at them as a more general frame test that everyone uses all the time. A form of saying "Yo, are you really like that? Is this you or just some show you're putting on?" Poking someone else's values, motivations or beliefs to figure out what we should think about him or her is super valuable. We need that kind of information to make decisions about whether someone is the company we're looking for. That's also why the actual specific…
/r/seduction27/01/15 05:49 AM
46

And the only way to pass it I disagree. Over time actively friendzoning women fast and efficiently has probably become one of my strongest tools. Step 1) Friendzone asap. Either via "Let's just be friends" or by making fun of her for suggesting something similar. Step 2) Keep non-sexual kino up. Treat her as "one of the guys" which means she gets to hear cool stories (including about women) and all the other good stuff that would usually be bragging if we were sexually interested at this point. …
/r/seduction26/01/15 05:24 PM
3

I never claimed it was. Neither does the police, nor does the government. What counts however is that the fear itself exists and measures like these improve life for a decent amount of the population - besides not doing harm or being lucrative. (As a side note according to German crime statistics women are more often victims to sexual crimes than men - just not in public places.) In fact there are quite some modern Feminists that are very openly against these things because they both "portray a …
/r/PussyPass28/12/14 02:24 PM
0

In a nutshell it goes back to studies starting in the 90ies which showed that women are afraid to use certain public areas like parks, underpasses, railway stations or similar "classy" dark dimly lit areas because because they are afraid of being attacked. Since a portion of your citizens actively avoiding certain areas more than others is both something that's not exactly cool but also costing huge amounts of money city planning started to take those things into account. Areas were redesigned, …
/r/PussyPass28/12/14 03:01 AM
23

Nothing a good wing can't handle!
/r/seduction04/10/14 07:37 AM
8

If it happens again (work on your delivery obv) blow it off with being brutally honest. "Um, no. I really came over because I thought you were cute. I'm sorry, I don't do this kind of thing often so it feels a bit weird for me as well. Anyway, ..." For just a moment, be vulnerable about not being socially skilled. Be vulnerable about not being a super Casanova. If you can bring that across as completely honest you're showing more strength with it than any tough line could ever deliver. That migh…
/r/seduction24/04/14 04:15 PM
1

Because, as it can be seen from your story, your aim was off. In itself it's completely fine (even if in imo a bit dumb) to just go for dates exclusively but then you mentioned that you "didn't even bother for a number" (implying you could have gotten it easily) and you also imply that "that cancun line was inevitable". Both are excuses to make yourself feel better. If you'd go for "Yeah I couldn't get her to agree to a date right then and there and knew I fucked up" and to the above reply a "Ye…
/r/seduction26/12/13 12:00 AM
2

You need to figure out what your goal in the interaction is. You just made an excuse for not getting her number because she rejected you aiming for a specific date. It's like saying "I tried to get into her pants and she slapped me so I'm pretty sure she would have slapped me if I tried to kiss her first as well." If you want to set up a date right then and there, go for it - but don't be surprised if you didn't build enough to make her agree to it. If you want to get her number and then work fr…
/r/seduction25/12/13 06:46 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter