TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

r_rships_account Archive

View 11 posts and 1,896 comments by r_rships_account on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
960

r_rships_account/r/MensRights23/03/13 07:09 AM
46

Blue Pill Exampler_rships_account/r/TheRedPill12/07/13 08:31 AM
16

r_rships_account/r/TheRedPill10/04/13 06:01 AM
13

r_rships_account/r/MensRights21/07/13 03:14 AM
13

Red Pill Exampler_rships_account/r/TheRedPill25/06/13 12:05 PM
2

r_rships_account/r/TheRedPill06/04/13 02:01 AM
2

r_rships_account/r/MensRights10/10/12 01:38 PM
1

r_rships_account/r/TheRedPill09/07/13 03:43 AM
0

r_rships_account/r/TheRedPill06/03/13 01:46 AM
0

r_rships_account/r/MensRights01/07/13 01:10 AM
0

r_rships_account/r/MensRights10/07/13 05:17 AM
Showing the 1,000 most recent of 1,896 comments.
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

I'm shocked that they banned you as well. Your comments were some of the best on the sub.
/r/MensRights22/07/13 01:23 AM
1

Why?
/r/TheRedPill18/07/13 12:25 PM
0

"Big boy pants" sounds as juvenile as any of the terms proposed to be avoided.
/r/TheRedPill18/07/13 12:24 PM
6

"Cock carousel" is too vivid to give up ...
/r/TheRedPill18/07/13 12:15 PM
2

The talent of a great lawyer lies in the capacity to build a working knowledge of any field in a tiny timeframe.
/r/TheRedPill18/07/13 09:33 AM
1

I'm not going to get into an argument with you Then I don't know what you're doing here really.
/r/MensRights17/07/13 12:27 AM
1

Then "procreation" is a red herring.
/r/MensRights16/07/13 05:23 AM
-1

Funny, sad and most importantly true. You have the makings of a professional writer.
/r/TheRedPill15/07/13 10:07 AM
3

If you [sic] sorry for the animals then you are half way to being a woman. I don't think so. Being genuinely sorry for animals (not just for show) is inconsistent with female solipsism.
/r/TheRedPill14/07/13 08:53 AM
0

There are not that many people in the entire world That doesn't stop DNA analysts from expressing probability in that fashion.
/r/TheRedPill13/07/13 09:15 AM
0

You don't need to have sex with or kiss somebody to catch it. Close contact, sharing drinks etc. can do it.
/r/TheRedPill13/07/13 09:13 AM
0

You don't know where you got the virus from.
/r/TheRedPill13/07/13 03:38 AM
1

He hasn't had a cold sore since they were together. Unlikely he gave it to her.
/r/TheRedPill13/07/13 12:21 AM
18

Pity it's downvoted :/
/r/TheRedPill12/07/13 09:34 AM
1

Not at all. Poor people can procreate too. Bud.
/r/MensRights12/07/13 07:46 AM
3

I think they just want a girl who's attractive.
/r/MensRights12/07/13 02:45 AM
2

Yeah, age is a proxy for youthfulness.
/r/MensRights12/07/13 02:42 AM
2

The difference is that wanting a hot woman is about sex, and wanting a rich man isn't.
/r/MensRights12/07/13 02:40 AM
2

Do you mean sexier or more appealing?
/r/MensRights12/07/13 02:37 AM
1

Someone always has to make less.
/r/MensRights12/07/13 02:31 AM
2

Maybe at that point the gamble is worth it.
/r/MensRights12/07/13 02:27 AM
8

The supporters of that comment thought it was funny to imagine someone awful getting a taste of their own medicine.
/r/MensRights12/07/13 02:24 AM
1

We don't get paid more in highly skilled jobs compared with the USA. We get paid less.
/r/MensRights12/07/13 02:13 AM
2

Or it might show they're broke ...
/r/MensRights12/07/13 02:11 AM
0

Notice that their gold-digging doesn't really kick in until 23.
/r/MensRights12/07/13 12:50 AM
-1

They should certainly take responsibility for and work on their weight. That said, this is irrelevant to any culpability on the vendor's part.
/r/TheRedPill10/07/13 12:43 PM
1

None of that bears upon whether OP is also at fault.
/r/TheRedPill10/07/13 10:25 AM
-8

You, like the ice-cream vendor, are not responsible for her actions, you're responsible for yours. Inducing somebody to break their diet is not the most admirable behaviour.
/r/TheRedPill10/07/13 06:22 AM
1

Your net upvotes are at -1, and 5 people have downvoted you, while 3 (including me, you excepted) have upvoted you. I think your post was one of the most thought-provoking I've ever read on /r/TRP.
/r/TheRedPill10/07/13 05:14 AM
3

most of us here are just as righteous and vindicated as teh feminists I think it's more "some of us" than "most of us", and mainly the mods (this one in particular). The regular users are cool.
/r/TheRedPill10/07/13 04:36 AM
2

The main difference is that dogs generally tend not to bite.
/r/TheRedPill10/07/13 04:27 AM
1

What, all of them?
/r/TheRedPill10/07/13 04:26 AM
1

I think you're being downvoted because of /r/TRP's barely latent homophobia.
/r/TheRedPill10/07/13 04:24 AM
1

"Women - you can't live with them [...]"
/r/TheRedPill10/07/13 04:23 AM
1

I'm not interested in less than a 7.75, so that basically rules out most women.
/r/TheRedPill10/07/13 04:20 AM
0

For me I still love women, but thats because I am a red blooded male. In other words, no homo?
/r/TheRedPill10/07/13 04:18 AM
1

No, I generally don't like them. Because I generally don't like them, I don't have much inclination to have sex with them either.
/r/TheRedPill10/07/13 04:16 AM
0

Ever hear of aiding and abetting?
/r/TheRedPill10/07/13 04:06 AM
9

By then it's too late. You're fucked.
/r/TheRedPill10/07/13 04:02 AM
0

I've always found that kicking them out makes them appreciate it more.
/r/TheRedPill10/07/13 04:01 AM
2

they don't really claim to be unsafe anymore. They have numerous organisations (B'nai Brith, the ADL) dedicated to claiming exactly that.
/r/TheRedPill10/07/13 03:49 AM
2

The crazy part is that she still believed that it is something that men should do since 5 girls might not require it, but the 6th one might feel pressured into sex without it. "It is better that 5 innocents suffer, than that one guilty man go free."
/r/TheRedPill10/07/13 03:37 AM
5

When this sub started, most of the posts were of the "Red Pill Theory" variety. Now, about 40% of the posts I see are narrations of somebody's pickup attempt in a bar in Scotland (or Tennessee, or NJ). When this sub started, it was like any normal sub: you didn't have "Endorsed Contributors" controlling the discourse through the (rather beta, actually) sycophancy of others. When this sub started, I never saw any censorship. All that has changed.
/r/TheRedPill10/07/13 03:33 AM
0

(also, it's an embarassing topic that women may feel more comfortable talking to the same sex about, even with the anonymity of the Internet). FTFY.
/r/TheRedPill10/07/13 03:28 AM
2

To be fair the Jews have had people out to get them; their safety has been legitimately threatened many times throughout history. Perhaps. Not in 21st-century America.
/r/TheRedPill10/07/13 03:25 AM
4

Yeah, I don't think the trust-fund debutantes of /r/TwoX live in low-income neighbourhoods.
/r/TheRedPill10/07/13 03:16 AM
1

The safest people in the history of mankind are constantly claiming they lack safety. Women, Jews, Americans, etc., etc. It almost seems like the sacrifice of liberty for security isn't worth it.
/r/TheRedPill10/07/13 03:12 AM
1

But she'll be upset about it either way.
/r/TheRedPill10/07/13 03:10 AM
2

Girls don't have to do that because they have guys approaching them. ... Because guys like sex more than girls.
/r/TheRedPill10/07/13 03:07 AM
0

Hilarious.
/r/TheRedPill10/07/13 03:07 AM
5

We don't have anything like 140k yet, and I think /r/TRP is already changing for the worse.
/r/TheRedPill10/07/13 03:06 AM
20

I am surprised and impressed by the support that this post is getting on /r/TwoX. Maybe there is hope for humanity after all.
/r/TheRedPill09/07/13 03:46 PM
1

She'll lose in the divorce.
/r/TheRedPill09/07/13 02:37 AM
2

I learned years ago that women mirror male emotional states, the same way small children do. that's the difference in how small kids react when they fall down. if a mother gets all worked up, its her reaction that results in the kid crying. on the other hand, often times when the man responds to the child's fall by picking the kid up, dusting them off, asking if they're oKay, without the hysterics, it results in the kid not crying. This is an insightful comment which explains why aloofness works…
/r/askTRP08/07/13 06:42 AM
1

What I'm saying is that not all (in fact, few) rapes are the dramatic attack you describe. Rape can be constituted by a failure to stop on request during previously consensual sex.
/r/MensRights08/07/13 03:50 AM
1

Why would she divorce a SAH dad when she makes 3 times as much money? He'll get the kids, the house and maybe alimony ...
/r/TheRedPill08/07/13 02:08 AM
1

Being able to PROVIDE is the biggest aspect of beta masculinity FTFY.
/r/TheRedPill08/07/13 02:03 AM
1

Unusual. In many respects, your relationship has the sexes reversed: she's older, earning 6 figures and doesn't seem to want kids that much; you're, younger, a pretty-boy, and seemingly hankering for the pitter-patter of little feet. Given that dynamic, I'm not sure that conventional red-pill advice is going to work so well for you. I would look into having a baby by means of donated ovum and surrogacy in a jurisdiction where the surrogate mother will have no parental rights. That will tick the …
/r/TheRedPill08/07/13 01:59 AM
2

The feeling of being an "actor" (a doer) in the world capable of effecting change, for good or ill. Let's be honest. How many women you know can move furniture by themselves, run a profitable business, fix their cars or physically defend themselves? Not so many as men, my money says.
/r/TheRedPill08/07/13 01:47 AM
1

Psychopaths are impulsive people who give barely a second thought for others or even for the possibility of themselves being found out. I don't want to confuse the discussion with aspies (who I think are really a relatively non-toxic subcategory of narcissists). Psychopaths exhibit a diminished level of empathy. Look at the Hare Psychopathy Clecklist.
/r/MensRights08/07/13 01:44 AM
2

Well, we don't know how many she had. We know she had two in a threesome. If that's all there were, she would be a reasonably safe bet (her present conduct aside). Somehow I doubt it tho.
/r/TheRedPill08/07/13 01:40 AM
1

not someone who hunts down a woman and violently attacks her for his own temporary sexual enjoyment. That, sir, is not the definition of rape. And we're not talking about life imprisonment, or even the death penalty. We're talking about judicial torture.
/r/MensRights08/07/13 01:39 AM
7

Women want to change men to appropriate men's agency for themselves, because they lack agency.
/r/TheRedPill07/07/13 02:58 PM
2

Tell her she knows where the door is. Don't wife her under any circumstances. This girl thinks she has a right to dictate your opinions and whether you can go to parties. Fuck her till it gets boring.
/r/TheRedPill07/07/13 02:10 PM
2

You have to be that rock, be able to walk away. Rocks don't walk away ...
/r/TheRedPill07/07/13 02:02 PM
1

An eye for an eye sends the whole world blind.
/r/MensRights07/07/13 01:34 PM
6

You have no place in a civilised society.
/r/MensRights07/07/13 01:32 PM
-1

People who don't develop an adult sense of empathy are called psychopaths.
/r/MensRights07/07/13 01:29 PM
0

as harmful
/r/TheRedPill07/07/13 02:06 AM
1

I don't live in America. It would be unlawful where I live.
/r/TheRedPill07/07/13 02:05 AM
1

Yeah, it doesn't make any sense and thus raises broader questions about the study. Women find shame hot? Ich don't think so.
/r/TheRedPill06/07/13 03:32 PM
-1

Reinforcing this stereotype by having women-only facilities is as harmful to women as it is to men, because its yet another message being thrown at them that we men are the enemy and we should be feared. It is not at all clear why you think that giving women the message that men are the enemy and should be feared somehow makes reinforcing this stereotype as harmful to women as to men, but I otherwise agree.
/r/TheRedPill06/07/13 02:53 PM
2

This comment clearly isolates the most important issue here.
/r/TheRedPill06/07/13 02:36 PM
1

There are male only gyms in every large city. Not in the city of 4 million where I live. (I suppose it could depend of your definition of a "large city.)
/r/TheRedPill06/07/13 02:35 PM
3

but I tell you one thing, I would never ever let my wife go to a gym and workout with men there. Given that in most gyms people just don't talk to each other unless they already know each other (as has been observed elsewhere ITT), why on earth not? I'd say your wife is more likely maintain her virtue at the gym than on a "girls' night out".
/r/TheRedPill06/07/13 02:33 PM
3

My gym already has something kinda like that: the cardio equipment and the weights are separated. Hardly any guys go near the cardio equipment, and I've only ever seen one girl touch the weights :/
/r/TheRedPill06/07/13 02:28 PM
7

Most of these women will also hardly ever show up and thus be dream customers.
/r/TheRedPill06/07/13 02:19 PM
2

I think you're partly right, but "I take offense to that" is not much of an argument against it.
/r/TheRedPill06/07/13 02:18 PM
3

The real reason for women's only gyms is that fat women want to feel okay working out, away from the potential judgment of the men they claim not to need. Spot on.
/r/TheRedPill06/07/13 02:17 PM
3

I don't think that's correct at all.
/r/MensRights05/07/13 02:31 PM
1

Freemasons are incredibly blue-pill white knights.
/r/TheRedPill05/07/13 01:57 PM
0

You're just being rude.
/r/TheRedPill05/07/13 01:54 PM
47

32 ...
/r/TheRedPill05/07/13 01:37 PM
1

Well, Tony Abbot, the Liberal opposition leader, is almost certain to be elected to replace Labour in the next few months, and he's pretty RP. But Australia is too far gone for that to make any difference, IMHO. If I were you I'd look closely at Japan. Lovely girls there. (My first girlfriend in first grade was Japanese, and she was so nice and respectful but also DTF!)
/r/TheRedPill05/07/13 10:23 AM
1

Any time. If I were you I'd stay the fuck away from Oz too.
/r/TheRedPill05/07/13 10:11 AM
1

Touché.
/r/MensRights05/07/13 10:03 AM
1

It is about that (if your job even has a minimum wage - not all do), but the cost of everything (food, clothes, electronics, etc.) wipes out any advantage. Sydney and Melbourne are 2 of the 5 most expensive cities in the world to live in. When I see US prices my mind reels.
/r/TheRedPill05/07/13 10:03 AM
2

I'm a Brit living in Australia. I mean all relationships.
/r/TheRedPill05/07/13 09:58 AM
1

I've met a few, but they're all over 70.
/r/TheRedPill05/07/13 04:23 AM
6

New Zealand women are terrible, unless you need some yard work done.
/r/TheRedPill05/07/13 03:57 AM
2

Interesting. The food prices are no worse than Australia.
/r/TheRedPill05/07/13 03:54 AM
1

Sure, but the above is what they think they want.
/r/TheRedPill05/07/13 03:53 AM
2

They're looking at the whole package
/r/TheRedPill05/07/13 03:39 AM
3

They just say this to avoid seeming "shallow". Also, they define "sense of humour" to mean laughing at all their jokes (no matter how lame) and "kindness" to mean obeying their every command.
/r/TheRedPill05/07/13 03:37 AM
2

"iPhone" uses less column-space than "smartphone".
/r/MensRights05/07/13 01:51 AM
1

That's quite normal in sex cases. The complainant is usually the only real witness.
/r/MensRights05/07/13 01:49 AM
2

... And thanks to British "justice", his DNA will remain on file for life.
/r/MensRights05/07/13 01:47 AM
8

Imagine the response from reddit if this were a woman who had cheated on her boyfriend ...
/r/TheRedPill03/07/13 02:44 PM
3

Merliner.
/r/TheRedPill03/07/13 02:42 PM
-3

Yes, it leads too readily to unacceptable truths.
/r/MensRights03/07/13 12:52 PM
4

This is insightful, funny and a beautiful piece of writing. Ironically perhaps, although it wasn't in the notebook he did end up writing about them.
/r/TheRedPill01/07/13 03:58 AM
2

If so, it's a great loss.
/r/TheRedPill01/07/13 03:29 AM
3

There were some really good links to blogs citing scientific studies (notably Heartiste and The Rational Male) in the early days of this sub. Unfortunately, some kind of exodus from /r/seddit seems to have diluted these with PUA field reports in recent times. The best I can do is suggest you head over to the blogs I mentioned and check out the valuable links /u/iKill_eu has posted elsewhere in this thread.
/r/TheRedPill01/07/13 03:25 AM
-1

Banal.
/r/TheRedPill01/07/13 03:20 AM
-2

Assuming for a moment the proposition to be correct (which /u/ehGinjaNinja points out has not been proven), the question which seems to follow is, Why? As with so many things in life, the answer is probably simply that women can get away with a want of logic. Few work in fields which demand rigorous logical reasoning, and even their emotional flutterings are indulged in their social lives. Not so with us.
/r/TheRedPill01/07/13 03:16 AM
1

Eviscerate him.
/r/TheRedPill01/07/13 03:12 AM
4

Huh. Mine too. Funny, that.
/r/TheRedPill01/07/13 03:12 AM
4

Excellent diagram. I suspect it's based on Paul Graham's article 'How to Disagree'. I've rarely encountered argument from a woman concerning a sensitive topic higher than what the pyramid terms a "contradiction" (Graham's DH3).
/r/TheRedPill01/07/13 03:10 AM
14

Don't think smart women with a modicum of logic are an exception (common misconception men seem to have, holding out for a non-existent unicorn) because they're not. I went out with a girl who was a genius at pure math. She had a far greater aptitude for formal logic than I. But, as soon as it came to applying logical cognition to real-world data, reason went out the window in favour of feelings almost instantly.
/r/TheRedPill01/07/13 03:07 AM
1

Now my friends and I can argue all day about any host of issues and we often disagree. But in the end we will be friends and we'll grill some steaks together. For a women this distinction is impossible to make. If two of her friends are having heated discourse she will break up the argument. Its kind of what little dogs do when people have loud discussions they start barking because the feel excitement in the air. Because social standing trumps reason.
/r/TheRedPill01/07/13 03:04 AM
-1

The science or the anecdotes?
/r/TheRedPill01/07/13 02:55 AM
1

Fair enough :)
/r/MensRights01/07/13 02:03 AM
0

Yeah, we need more science and fewer PUA anecdotes.
/r/TheRedPill01/07/13 01:25 AM
1

Spoken like a true Master of the Holes.
/r/TheRedPill01/07/13 01:24 AM
0

Bravado.
/r/TheRedPill01/07/13 01:23 AM
1

Rational, loyal and honest?
/r/TheRedPill30/06/13 11:46 PM
1

Perhaps, but it saves the government money
/r/MensRights30/06/13 04:40 PM
1

The government appoints a panel to determine which drugs are subsidised and for what. Because they don't want the panel to play Santa Claus with other people's money, there is an elaborate process before the panel can determine that a drug be subsidised, including application for subsidy by the manufacturer.
/r/MensRights30/06/13 04:24 PM
1

It's not a 1.5% tax at all. Health spending consumes as much of the federal budget as anything else. And Australian taxes are way high.
/r/MensRights30/06/13 04:20 PM
0

That's exactly what Australia's subsidised medical programs are about too.
/r/MensRights30/06/13 04:17 PM
1

So that the government subsidises as few drugs as possible.
/r/MensRights30/06/13 04:15 PM
1

Australia is one of the most feminised countries in the world, especially under the recently-toppled PM, Julia Gillard. They even funded the HPV vaccine for boys to reduce transmission to girls. This crap comes as no real surprise.
/r/MensRights30/06/13 04:13 PM
-1

Jew York is not the city I would have chosen to invade with foreskins first.
/r/MensRights30/06/13 04:05 PM
3

Does anyone have any background on this site? Is it legit?
/r/MensRights30/06/13 04:03 PM
8

I would have thought that discussing methods of killing went beyond "the average feminist rant".
/r/MensRights30/06/13 04:02 PM
1

So boyfriend them and then deboyfriend them.
/r/TheRedPill30/06/13 03:52 PM
4

You really need to ask? Don't get invested.
/r/TheRedPill30/06/13 03:46 PM
1

Tren?
/r/TheRedPill30/06/13 03:45 PM
2

I think you have the solution to /u/EBM22's problem.
/r/TheRedPill30/06/13 03:42 PM
7

I agree. This guy is a pain in the neck, and there's precious little insight to be found.
/r/TheRedPill30/06/13 03:36 PM
1

Except others like her.
/r/MensRights30/06/13 02:30 PM
1

Wanna know what I had you tagged as in RES?
/r/TheRedPill30/06/13 02:22 PM
1

This is actually very funny.
/r/TheRedPill30/06/13 08:26 AM
3

A full awareness of the female taste for novelty above all else does little for one's ego.
/r/TheRedPill30/06/13 08:11 AM
2

Try to kiss her she waves me off because shes kind of seeing someone. [...] Try to kiss her she waves me off because shes kind of seeing someone. Keep asking her out on dates. She keeps going with me. Dude, you were warned.
/r/TheRedPill30/06/13 08:07 AM
-1

Maybe 50%. No. Only if she's a Lesbian. No. Yes, with a man. No. My shrink.
/r/TheRedPill30/06/13 08:01 AM
1

Einstein, when he wasn't doing physics and math, was a bullshit artist. (Hence his ability to attract women.) I can't believe you think he developed his theories by "feelings". I note that you don't address my point directly, or at all. Your aggressive ad hominem attacks do little justice the man who wowed us only 24 hours ago with his knowledge of Nietzsche. I suspect you will have a bad time on this sub. You are now tagged with an epithet in my RES. Finally, whatever criticisms might legitimat…
/r/TheRedPill30/06/13 07:30 AM
1

intuition [ˌɪntjʊˈɪʃən] n knowledge or belief obtained neither by reason nor by perception instinctive knowledge or belief a hunch or unjustified belief (Philosophy) Philosophy immediate knowledge of a proposition or object such as Kant's account of our knowledge of sensible objects the supposed faculty or process by which we obtain any of these I am a rationalist. If you believe you can know things by some means other than reason or perception, you are anti-scientific, anti-empirical and lackin…
/r/TheRedPill30/06/13 04:31 AM
1

Sorry for the confusion - I took your wording to mean that women specifically tend to be "self-oriented" as compared to men. Why would that be sexist? Are generalisations about women sexist when they don't reflect well on women? If so, are generalisations about men sexist when they don't reflect well on men?
/r/MensRights30/06/13 04:15 AM
1

What's sexist about it?
/r/MensRights30/06/13 04:13 AM
0

Well, now that you see their true face, what are you going to do? Are you going to waste your time being an "ally" on their made-up issues, or are you going to stop being a goddamn mangina and stand up for what you believe in, alone if necessary?
/r/MensRights30/06/13 04:06 AM
1

Things which are not amenable to precise description are unreal and therefore worthless. "Intuition", not based on reason, is one such thing.
/r/TheRedPill30/06/13 01:54 AM
1

Glad to have met you. I see I'm not the only one!
/r/TheRedPill30/06/13 01:34 AM
1

Szasz is the greatest thinker of the 20th century.
/r/TheRedPill30/06/13 01:31 AM
2

He needs to develop his intuition, so that he can feel these things. That sounds like something a deluded woman would say.
/r/TheRedPill30/06/13 01:28 AM
7

Where do people think this sub came from?
/r/TheRedPill30/06/13 01:26 AM
6

Half of those "pussies" post here too.
/r/TheRedPill30/06/13 01:25 AM
8

What do you switch to if music theory is too hard? You've obviously never studied music theory at college level.
/r/TheRedPill30/06/13 01:17 AM
-1

No, there aren't. What you describe is an acquired skill that is underpinned by (you guessed it) intelligence.
/r/TheRedPill30/06/13 01:12 AM
0

Fun-loving, sensual and happy to follow our lead = Irresponsible, narcissistic and boring. Not a combination I find particularly attractive, even assuming you can stay away from the feminist manjaws who insist men follow their lead.
/r/TheRedPill29/06/13 07:44 AM
18

Pre-nups can be abolished when no-fault divorce is abolished. They just want to have their cake and eat it too.
/r/TheRedPill29/06/13 07:34 AM
0

Most of the guys I know wouldn't have a clue how much casual sex thee other guys they know are getting.
/r/TheRedPill29/06/13 07:31 AM
2

That's because it's full of women.
/r/TheRedPill29/06/13 07:29 AM
-1

I don't think it's that. I think he just lacks any principle whatever. Can you find a post by him expressing concern for principle?
/r/TheRedPill29/06/13 07:13 AM
1

All I did was respond to /u/JohnKimble111's literal words. We agree about this. There's no reason to get wound up.
/r/MensRights29/06/13 07:12 AM
1

Underclass.
/r/TheRedPill29/06/13 07:00 AM
1

Shit, that was better than the original post. A tour de force, in fact. Bravo, sir.
/r/TheRedPill28/06/13 12:38 PM
1

Sounds like your advice might be a bit biased and ill thought through.
/r/MensRights28/06/13 11:02 AM
1

It is genuinely medically indicated in some (pretty rare) cases. I don't think an absolute ban on funding will work.
/r/MensRights28/06/13 11:01 AM
1

Precedents concerning Jehovah's Witnesses' objections to transfusion certainly do exist in Australia.
/r/MensRights28/06/13 11:00 AM
1

Which would you rather the debate be about? The barbarous practice, or the terminology? When countries across the world banned female circumcision 20+ years ago, nobody was calling it FGM.
/r/MensRights28/06/13 10:56 AM
3

Huh. Maybe someone should start an "against women's rights" sub. I doubt there'd be as many subscribers.
/r/MensRights28/06/13 10:46 AM
2

What is the AMR survey?
/r/MensRights28/06/13 09:28 AM
9

You are born knowing how to inseminate, not how to give pleasure.
/r/TheRedPill28/06/13 03:32 AM
1

Read the relevant sexological literature. Practice.
/r/TheRedPill28/06/13 03:31 AM
4

Your behaviour is unprincipled.
/r/TheRedPill28/06/13 03:18 AM
1

There might not even be a her in the picture.
/r/TheRedPill28/06/13 01:52 AM
1

Did you know that the United States consists of around 55-60 jurisdictions?
/r/MensRights28/06/13 01:50 AM
1

Not going to happen.
/r/MensRights27/06/13 02:37 PM
1

It's called a spill because that is slang for a fight.
/r/MensRights27/06/13 02:37 PM
1

England has an offence of housebreaking tho.
/r/MensRights27/06/13 01:38 PM
1

Not necessarily. It depends on your jurisdiction.
/r/MensRights27/06/13 01:37 PM
2

Because women (modern, feminist women) are a significant majority of the TV audience.
/r/MensRights27/06/13 12:59 PM
4

Well, look where all their caring for the young seems to be getting the young ...
/r/TheRedPill27/06/13 09:47 AM
2

/r/sex is always like that. Has been for years.
/r/TheRedPill27/06/13 09:36 AM
-2

You must have a submissive streak.
/r/TheRedPill27/06/13 07:08 AM
1

"Low-value threads" (posts/submissions) are what the downvote button is for.
/r/TheRedPill27/06/13 07:08 AM
1

Why?
/r/TheRedPill27/06/13 07:05 AM
2

In fairness, some of the research which the Norwegian sociologists are criticised for failing to accept is qualitative in nature. grammar
/r/MensRights26/06/13 02:01 PM
1

There's no money in racquetball, but it's still one of the most physically demanding sports there is (IMHO). I think living in a place where only schoolkids play a sport tends to diminish one's view of the fitness levels of highly graded players in that sport.
/r/TheRedPill26/06/13 04:13 AM
1

Maybe (depends what sort of fitness we're talking about), but you didn't exactly answer my question. I take it table-tennis isn't big where you live?
/r/TheRedPill26/06/13 02:33 AM
1

Have you ever noticed the fitness level of a high-grade table-tennis player?
/r/TheRedPill25/06/13 02:20 PM
3

Thanks for this update with what I take to be this person's next missive?
/r/TheRedPill25/06/13 02:04 PM
3

Well spotted.
/r/TheRedPill25/06/13 02:00 PM
1

Interesting theory. BTW, Emma Watson looks like an attractive but effeminate 18-year-old gay guy in that picture.
/r/TheRedPill25/06/13 01:58 PM
7

I like this. I actually think it's very insightful. I'd never really considered it this way, but I think it's true. Also, the sort of girl you can pick up at this activity is generally an attention-whore. Not the sort of girl who's good for longer than the night.
/r/TheRedPill25/06/13 11:33 AM
4

He'd be mad to do anything else.
/r/TheRedPill25/06/13 11:19 AM
18

What I find funny about the person who sent him this message is that he's not telling OP to be beta because it's the right thing to do, he's telling him to be beta because otherwise (according to this person) he won't get any pussy. This person then criticises /r/TRP for supposedly being willing to go to great lengths to get pussy. It's all just so hypocritical.
/r/TheRedPill25/06/13 11:15 AM
11

And yet feminists have the audacity to hijack their legacy for their own perverse ends.
/r/TheRedPill25/06/13 10:30 AM
7

Bear in mind, these are Australian women: the most unattractively masculine and domineering on earth. They make American women look like Filipinas in comparison, and could probably drink you under the table. *sp
/r/TheRedPill25/06/13 07:11 AM
3

Also Vitamin D, of which insufficiency can lower testosterone levels.
/r/TheRedPill25/06/13 06:18 AM
1

Why do they always want to cut their hair off?
/r/TheRedPill25/06/13 06:16 AM
1

If their ugly friend is hot, that must make them stunning ...
/r/TheRedPill25/06/13 06:12 AM
5

This is what the chick writing them looks like.
/r/TheRedPill25/06/13 06:05 AM
1

Sookie is a slut riding the cock carousel, and the whole storyline is really about empowering women to slut it up and bang lots of hot guys without suffering any consequences, which is what all the old fat women watching this thing fantasize about. First, they can't get guys like that, and second, they want to live in a world without consequences for women. This sort of predominantly female-oriented fantasy is a huge genre now. All the stories have a common moral: women - and women only - can do…
/r/TheRedPill25/06/13 06:03 AM
0

The body-language stuff is worthwhile, but the rest ...
/r/TheRedPill24/06/13 11:53 PM
1

Fair enough, I missed that. Tho strictly speaking that doesn't mean you haven't fucked a desperada ;)
/r/TheRedPill24/06/13 12:26 PM
1

YOLO!
/r/MensRights24/06/13 08:17 AM
1

LOL. I'm sure there's a joke there, but I can't quite put my finger on it.
/r/TheRedPill24/06/13 04:52 AM
3

Unless her husband was loaded and she got an excellent divorce settlement, that's true.
/r/TheRedPill24/06/13 04:52 AM
1

Some of us. My father looked after me at home until I was school-age, and I often went to work with him instead of to school thereafter.
/r/TheRedPill24/06/13 04:49 AM
1

I think it's a /s, guys.
/r/TheRedPill24/06/13 04:46 AM
1

You seem experienced in this. I have a question. I've never fucked a woman who's given birth vaginally. Does it feel different?
/r/TheRedPill24/06/13 04:45 AM
18

ended up drinking with a group of 18 year olds. It was one of their birthdays and her father had put £400 behind the bar. And we wonder how they got this way.
/r/TheRedPill24/06/13 04:30 AM
9

Bingo! This was always about her getting to fuck around on him, one way or the other.
/r/TheRedPill24/06/13 04:27 AM
3

I can't say your approach is likely to bring others into the red-pill fold.
/r/TheRedPill24/06/13 04:26 AM
1

you do manipulate. you are just not aware of it. If you're not aware of it, it ain't manipulation.
/r/TheRedPill22/06/13 01:46 AM
1

Women love sex, can't get enough of it Kinsey's data would disagree.
/r/TheRedPill22/06/13 01:44 AM
2

If somebody promised you eternal childhood, being "taken care of" by others, wouldn't you be tempted?
/r/TheRedPill22/06/13 01:42 AM
2

Why should anyone, woman or man, be able to be anything [s]he wants[?]
/r/TheRedPill22/06/13 01:36 AM
2

It's a straw man to label somebody opposed to communism "paranoid".
/r/TheRedPill22/06/13 01:33 AM
2

I think many of the ideas developed 300 years ago were good. Not so much those developed 100 years ago. The latter are in many respects the antithesis of the former.
/r/TheRedPill22/06/13 01:32 AM
1

Female taste isn't necessarily bad - look at flowers or stuff like velvet evening gowns, or pearl necklaces, ain't they pretty? No ...
/r/TheRedPill22/06/13 12:54 AM
3

"Needs."
/r/TheRedPill22/06/13 12:27 AM
2

It's just a plausible way of buying time to work out whether you're ripping them off or they can get a better deal elsewhere.
/r/TheRedPill22/06/13 12:27 AM
2

Why did you resist it?
/r/TheRedPill22/06/13 12:22 AM
1

Beautifully put.
/r/TheRedPill22/06/13 12:19 AM
1

Biggles.
/r/TheRedPill22/06/13 12:13 AM
1

Or most other men ...
/r/TheRedPill13/06/13 07:13 PM
1

Some of them aren't even bad-looking.
/r/TheRedPill12/06/13 01:47 PM
1

Jesus.
/r/TheRedPill12/06/13 01:46 PM
1

I live in a place where it's legal, and it's still taboo ...
/r/TheRedPill12/06/13 01:44 PM
0

Upvote for "ball cancer".
/r/TheRedPill12/06/13 01:42 PM
1

I don't know about prostitution, but Singapore is notorious for its government monopolies.
/r/TheRedPill12/06/13 01:39 PM
2

Would it make you happy if she pretended to be a dude?
/r/TheRedPill12/06/13 01:36 PM
1

A very apposite qualification.
/r/TheRedPill12/06/13 01:14 PM
2

Do you have a citation for the proposition that prostitution only became illegal when women got the vote?
/r/TheRedPill12/06/13 01:11 PM
1

At the end of the day, it matters little whether it's legal or not. It's not like prostitution is the major concern if any police force.
/r/TheRedPill12/06/13 01:09 PM
0

That testosterone :/
/r/TheRedPill12/06/13 12:55 PM
1

They do already.
/r/TheRedPill12/06/13 11:04 AM
3

More of the comments on /r/askmen seem to be from women than from men.
/r/TheRedPill12/06/13 11:01 AM
3

"It's just not" is not an argument.
/r/MensRights12/06/13 10:45 AM
0

So if I slice up your breasts and vulva with a razor, that's not sexual assault? O_o
/r/MensRights12/06/13 10:44 AM
3

Anyone can report a crime to the police.
/r/MensRights12/06/13 10:43 AM
1

Israeli guys (hot or not, mostly not) do this all the time. They move overseas to study, or just enrol in yeshiva.
/r/TheRedPill09/06/13 09:51 AM
1

AKA a joke ...
/r/TheRedPill09/06/13 09:48 AM
1

At least Israel is one of the few places in the world where it's gender-egalitarian bullshit.
/r/TheRedPill09/06/13 09:48 AM
1

God save me from secular Israeli girls.
/r/TheRedPill09/06/13 09:47 AM
1

There are many ways of having power in a relationship, and being less into her than she is into you is just one of them.
/r/TheRedPill09/06/13 09:45 AM
1

So it's not just bitches that be crazy.
/r/TheRedPill09/06/13 09:44 AM
-2

Why are you emphasising his error?
/r/MensRights09/06/13 07:40 AM
0

The users of this sub prefer not to have overseers tell them what is OK to say and what is not. Truth is best discovered by strong and unlimited advocacy on both (or all) sides of the question.
/r/MensRights09/06/13 07:39 AM
2

The PM of Australia is not the Premier of Western Australia. That person (Colin Barnett) is a man. However, the WA Minister for Child Protection (Robyn McSweeney) is a woman.
/r/MensRights09/06/13 07:34 AM
0

LOL.
/r/MensRights09/06/13 07:31 AM
0

When I was younger I suffered from very, very violent outbursts due to abuse I'd suffered most of my life and kept secret [...] I always had to make some excuse to myself for behaving that way. And you still are, in a sense. You weren't able to say you engaged in violent outbursts without describing it as suffering from them, and you felt constrained to "explain" (excuse? justify?) their aetiology in the same sentence, without so much as a comma between the fact and the "explanation". And the re…
/r/MensRights09/06/13 06:45 AM
6

If you lived here long enough you'd discover that this webpage is entirely typical of the Australian government's attitude to relations between the sexes.
/r/MensRights09/06/13 06:41 AM
12

Literally nothing is ever their fault.
/r/MensRights09/06/13 06:40 AM
2

Hopefully this can all be cleared up. Hahahahahaha.
/r/MensRights09/06/13 06:39 AM
-7

Why is there such a discrepancy between that and the information found under Supporting Individuals and Families > Family and Domestic Violence? Because one of the pages is trying to pander to the gay lobby.
/r/MensRights09/06/13 06:38 AM
4

No, the current description of the helplines is not gender-neutral, and is exactly as OP posted: http://www.dcp.wa.gov.au/CrisisAndEmergency/Pages/DomesticViolenceHelplines.aspx
/r/MensRights09/06/13 06:37 AM
10

Nonsense. The description of the helplines is exactly the same: http://www.dcp.wa.gov.au/CrisisAndEmergency/Pages/DomesticViolenceHelplines.aspx
/r/MensRights09/06/13 06:36 AM
4

I feel that the people in charge of deciding what information is displayed have truly forgotten that all matters in life are a two way road. [...] I hope who ever decided what should be displayed on that webpage gets a quick education in how what he/she wrote was wrong. It's more complicated than that. I think you'll find that "whoever decided what should be displayed on that webpage" also decided the scope of the "services" the government would fund and even the phone numbers used to contact th…
/r/MensRights09/06/13 06:33 AM
-9

the moderators should get rid of the biting sarcasm [...] I honestly think the moderators should scan for buzzwords like "wymyn" and "patriarchy" and have free reign to delete these messages This is not a censorship forum. Go somewhere else if you want to control what other people are allowed to say. You're obviously in the wrong place. *BTW, it's "free rein".
/r/MensRights09/06/13 06:13 AM
-5

Well, it did have a fairly good point.
/r/MensRights09/06/13 06:11 AM
4

It would be amusing to have a friendly woman (I'm sure they exist!) phone the women's line pretending to be concerned about becoming violent or abusive. I wonder if they would tell her to phone the men's line ... or maybe they'd just tell her that she's an abuse victim starting to rise up against her perpetrator.
/r/MensRights09/06/13 06:08 AM
3

Welcome to the Democratic People's Republic of Australia. War is peace. Freedom is slavery. Ignorance is strength.
/r/MensRights09/06/13 06:05 AM
1

I've treated you with courtesy while you throw around epithets. You discredit your coveted "Endorsed Contributor" tag.
/r/TheRedPill07/06/13 08:31 AM
1

stupid as fuck commentary like: "you cant boost T (get gains) without roids" Boosting "T" is not the same thing as getting gains. You know that. I think those who disagree with you are saying that you can't get massive increases in serum testosterone levels without pharmaceutical supplementation. Nobody said what you claim they said.
/r/TheRedPill07/06/13 07:19 AM
10

I'm afraid that most of what you'll find on this sub will be mockery of you and your relationships with women. In short, the answer is No. Having said that, if what you're doing works for you, keep doing it.
/r/TheRedPill07/06/13 07:09 AM
1

you fuckin roid trolls Why do you call people who disagree with you names?
/r/TheRedPill07/06/13 06:58 AM
1

Means jack shit without posting your height / weight. Yeah, kinda like your previous comment: gain 15kgs of mass and increase all your lifts by 50% in the course of a year
/r/TheRedPill07/06/13 06:57 AM
2

Lol, true, I don't know them, same can be said about OP taking roids though. Hilarious. Actually, I rather assumed OP had bloods done. I can't imagine that any responsible person would start taking androgens without doing so. I'm not really sure what you mean by your numbered list. Everyone (male or female) has testosterone. (Even eunuchs.) I especially don't know what to make of number 4 in your list, which I find a little concerning. obviously you guys are right, the only WAY you can possibly …
/r/TheRedPill07/06/13 06:00 AM
1

Thanks for the link, which was informative. Perhaps I'm cynical, but I would want more than one set of pre-"therapy" blood levels to accept this (apparently quite extraordinary) result. I would also want to know the circumstances (time of day, fasting etc.) in which the samples were taken. Those sorts of differences alone can double (or halve) serum testosterone levels.
/r/TheRedPill07/06/13 05:50 AM
0

I'm not asking you to have blood tests. I'm disputing your ability to know what your testosterone levels actually are without having had them.
/r/TheRedPill07/06/13 05:43 AM
2

I would like to know the blood levels, please. Otherwise the analysis is completely subjective.
/r/TheRedPill07/06/13 04:31 AM
3

Beware of high DHT: male-pattern baldness.
/r/TheRedPill07/06/13 04:27 AM
3

One warning. If you're going to use exogenous androgens you should also take HCG unless you want to induce substantial depletion of endogenous androgens and testicular atrophy ...
/r/TheRedPill07/06/13 04:24 AM
2

You can boost T levels naturally pretty easily if you put in a bit of effort. I'm sorry, but I think that's nonsense. What sort of boost can you get "naturally"? Going from 20 nmol/dL to 22 nmol/dL?
/r/TheRedPill07/06/13 04:21 AM
1

I would agree that for someone who has low T, gear will help abit with natural masculine behavior. HOWEVER, it will not fix your mind. Do you speak from experience?
/r/TheRedPill07/06/13 04:20 AM
12

Those who think steroids are dangerous would do well to see Bigger Stronger Faster, an even-handed and entertaining discussion of the matter.
/r/TheRedPill07/06/13 04:18 AM
3

Every man should experience both androgen insufficiency and androgen excess if he wants better to understand the relations between the sexes.
/r/TheRedPill07/06/13 04:13 AM
1

I can't believe you kept your cool on the face of a passive-aggressive troll long enough to write that elegant refutation.
/r/TheRedPill07/06/13 04:02 AM
21

Sympathy is not born of selfishness and narcissism. Women lack sympathy because they are self-absorbed, and they are self-absorbed because they find that they can get away with it. It must be said that nursing is a career dominated by women. But of these women, how many pursue that career out of sympathy, and how many for what they can get from it? Look at the working life of a typical, Western-born nurse: five or ten years of full-time employment, during which carnal enjoyment is had and a prov…
/r/TheRedPill05/06/13 10:15 AM
1

Linky?
/r/TheRedPill26/05/13 03:42 AM
5

/r/seduction is a how-to forum that doesn't delve so deeply into the whys and wherefores. /r/TRP is essentially a philosophical discussion forum. To those who are allergic to the truth, explanations are more offensive than instructions.
/r/TheRedPill26/05/13 03:37 AM
13

I was just about to seal the deal and get some action, when a room mate busted through the door and started violently projectile vomiting. I was tripping way too hard on shrooms to deal with that, so I ended up excusing myself. Got a text later that I was owed a blowjob. I'll cash that in next time I'm in Pennsylvania. Your roommate is a generous guy.
/r/TheRedPill22/05/13 10:58 AM
2

It inhibits a free market in communications services.
/r/TheRedPill22/05/13 10:52 AM
0

The only way to deal with trolls is to limit your response to reminding others not to engage with trolls.
/r/TheRedPill22/05/13 03:36 AM
1

Hmm. I don't even support that.
/r/TheRedPill22/05/13 03:27 AM
1

First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they fight you, and then you win. I think we're already at the ridicule stage.
/r/TheRedPill21/05/13 04:15 AM
1

In one direction only.
/r/TheRedPill21/05/13 04:07 AM
1

I formed a friendship with an absolutely stunning girl (like movie-star stunning) who's married. (I'm not that kind of guy.) A few years later, the thought of fucking her is an instant boner-killer.
/r/TheRedPill21/05/13 04:05 AM
2

Glad to see 'dontchaknow' catching on again.
/r/TheRedPill21/05/13 04:00 AM
2

"Either" indicates only two possibilities.
/r/TheRedPill20/05/13 03:16 PM
0

You should too. OP didn't complain at all: he merely posited that porn is aimed at betas.
/r/TheRedPill20/05/13 03:13 PM
7

For real? Not knocking you, just asking.
/r/TheRedPill20/05/13 02:21 PM
1

Best comment in thread.
/r/TheRedPill20/05/13 02:18 PM
2

Women your age can't afford not to be sexually aggressive if they want to have sex.
/r/TheRedPill20/05/13 02:17 PM
1

As I matured I either saw less assertive women, or I never gave them the chance to assert. I can't tell. Surely there are further possibilities ...
/r/TheRedPill20/05/13 02:16 PM
-1

Who are you to insult people for their tastes in porn?
/r/TheRedPill20/05/13 02:13 PM
-4

Sure, they sometimes do. But there are often ulterior purposes too.
/r/TheRedPill20/05/13 02:12 PM
3

TIL I have much better game with women than I ever thought.
/r/TheRedPill20/05/13 02:10 PM
2

Or most of it is ad-libbed, and the woman is the highly paid star of the show, so she gets more say in what happens.
/r/TheRedPill20/05/13 02:09 PM
10

And squeaking.
/r/TheRedPill20/05/13 02:08 PM
2

Let's face it, unless you're insanely high status and/or good with women, a women will never be sexually assertive with you. but I'm sure there are some real women like that, but to a high status man they're extremely unattractive. This seems a little contradictory. Also, since when did all high-status men have the same sexual tastes?
/r/TheRedPill20/05/13 02:06 PM
1

I'm not the one following you around on comment threads Replying to your replies to my replies is "following you around?" Hmm. As to your question about Sands, you're asking if I think that if that had been a woman, they would have force fed her and kept her alive? No, I'm asking if they would have capitulated to her demands. Additionally, using one case of a man who starves to death during a hunger strike (besides the fact that it doesn't relate at all to eating disorders). Circular reasoning a…
/r/TheRedPill20/05/13 02:02 PM
-1

You yourself said: You don't know how many girls were throwing up or using laxatives or starving themselves and keeping it quiet because--they kept it quiet. I would say the troll is the person coming into a sub where they don't normally post.
/r/TheRedPill20/05/13 01:28 PM
9

In US terms, I'm libertarian. In Australia (where I live) they call libertarianism "the lunar right".
/r/TheRedPill20/05/13 06:21 AM
1

Is there some shortage of applicants for cardiac surgery residencies?
/r/TheRedPill20/05/13 06:18 AM
2

This is fair.
/r/TheRedPill20/05/13 06:17 AM
1

She's on strike but still getting paid. "Give me a free pass to do whatever I want or I won't do anything and you'll still have to pay me." I doubt she'll finish her residency.
/r/TheRedPill20/05/13 06:00 AM
4

No girl would agree to that. Not even if you were Ryan Gosling.
/r/TheRedPill20/05/13 05:53 AM
1

I think that's hogwash. Men generally value sex > validation. Women are the other way around. (So far as I can tell, women aren't much interested in genuine emotional intimacy.) Women also like to keep a couple of Plan Bs on the back-burner, if I may mix my metaphors.
/r/TheRedPill20/05/13 05:44 AM
-1

I'm not sure I necessarily agree about the rates of committing violent offences. Do you base your view on rates of reports to police?
/r/TheRedPill20/05/13 05:25 AM
1

Double ouch. I haven't read WSM since I was a kid. I'll have to go back to it.
/r/TheRedPill20/05/13 05:23 AM
0

Maybe you'll even come back and make an informed contribution when you've read them.
/r/TheRedPill20/05/13 05:02 AM
-3

No, we get charged with most of the violent crimes ...
/r/TheRedPill20/05/13 05:00 AM
2

The 136 upvotes suggest that this sub is very interested in it.
/r/TheRedPill20/05/13 04:59 AM
-1

Of course, it stands to reason that that which is concealed cannot be observed. By the same logic, you cannot know whether many girls with "eating disorders" conceal them. If you have medical data on the unobservable, I'll be interested to see it :)
/r/TheRedPill20/05/13 04:55 AM
-1

I hit a raw nerve, did I? Your purported sorrow is insincere and actually a very good example of my point. Thanks for providing one. Trying to personalise a discussion about an abstract issue is one marker of a person who knows they don't have a sound argument. It's not a marker of rational thinking or maturity. It also raises some questions about the individual's bona fides and character. I asked you a straight question. Why don't you give me a straight answer?
/r/TheRedPill20/05/13 04:45 AM
-2

That, madam, is not an argument. Do you think Bobby Sands would have died if he had been Bonnie Sands? (Google it if you're too young.)
/r/TheRedPill20/05/13 03:22 AM
0

People who are 5'6” and weigh 90lb aren't concealing anything. I've met so, so many of these girls. Often they deliberately orchestrate the discovery of their "disorders" (especially if they're not particularly thin to start with), such as by leaving a personal journal (open at the page describing their "anorexia") for their parents to find. They then become the family's centre of attention.
/r/TheRedPill20/05/13 03:20 AM
0

They affect women more than men because nobody gives a shit if men starve themselves to death.
/r/TheRedPill20/05/13 02:59 AM
2

The most common eating disorder in the West is eating too much.
/r/TheRedPill20/05/13 02:58 AM
-1

In my view, those with so-called "eating disorders" are passive-aggressive individuals engaged in emotional blackmail of their loved ones. They are on a hunger-strike. At common law, suicide was murder. Those who attempted it were charged with attempted murder. The German word for suicide is Selbstmord (self-murder). It's hard to imagine a murder without a victim.
/r/TheRedPill20/05/13 02:56 AM
4

"attempt" it. FTFY.
/r/TheRedPill20/05/13 02:50 AM
1

I think you misunderstand. I'm saying that those who would condemn calling "straight beta males" fags are being intellectually dishonest.
/r/TheRedPill20/05/13 02:43 AM
13

LOL, you're right on the ball.
/r/TheRedPill19/05/13 04:44 PM
15

Oral, anal, rimming ... do I only get one exception? ;)
/r/TheRedPill19/05/13 04:43 PM
1

The key is to get tested at the start and instill an ungodly fear into the woman of AIDS and STDS so that if she does cheat on you she'll at least use protection. Cheaters rarely use protection. You might scare her out of cheating at all tho.
/r/TheRedPill19/05/13 04:39 PM
0

You think that's funny?
/r/TheRedPill19/05/13 04:38 PM
1

Dominance is relative to who you are and who you relate to. Wouldn't that mean that a man who dominates a man is more dominant than a man who dominates a woman?
/r/TheRedPill19/05/13 04:31 PM
7

Cannot one be both a victim and a perpetrator?
/r/TheRedPill19/05/13 04:29 PM
-1

He didn't say all women did this. He made a similar error to that which you allege in his second sentence tho.
/r/TheRedPill19/05/13 04:26 PM
6

It might be an over-generalisation.
/r/TheRedPill19/05/13 04:25 PM
8

I remember being told that falsehood in class by my 11th grade history teacher. The look on her face when I grabbed an etymological dictionary which traced the word to Greek istoria was indescribable.
/r/TheRedPill19/05/13 04:24 PM
-1

/s?
/r/TheRedPill19/05/13 04:22 PM
1

You seem to know your Somerset Maugham. Any other gems you can share with us?
/r/TheRedPill19/05/13 04:18 PM
3

Somerset Maugham is history? I feel old. *Jesus Christ, WSM certainly had swallowed the red pill tho. ...I did not know then how great a part is played in women's life by the opinion of others. It throws a shadow of insincerity over their most deeply felt emotions. Ouch. Women are constantly trying to commit suicide for love, but generally they take care not to succeed. It's generally a gesture to arouse pity or terror in their lover. Its truth is reflected in the stats.
/r/TheRedPill19/05/13 04:01 PM
28

When you trap a hamster, it giggles coyly.
/r/TheRedPill19/05/13 04:00 PM
3

I agree, in general terms. Don't forget tho, both sexes' jawbones resorb throughout life. Your strong chin at 30 may become substantially visually weaker by the time you're 50. We are entering an era in which plastic surgery will be widely sought after by men, earlier in life than is usual in women, for correction of congenital osseous deficiencies. I've had such surgery myself. (Based on my looks alone, it took me from a 5 to a 7.) Fascinatingly, such surgery is generally considered medically n…
/r/TheRedPill19/05/13 01:09 PM
1

Thank you!
/r/TheRedPill19/05/13 11:51 AM
-1

The grass is always greener, dude.
/r/TheRedPill19/05/13 11:49 AM
9

Even on looks alone, women look less attractive much faster, because the state of their skin is more important than facial structure. Brad Pitt is 49. Tom Cruise is 50. (They would remember the first moon landing.) How many female "sex symbols" are that age?
/r/TheRedPill19/05/13 07:06 AM
0

He's our resident homophobe. Or maybe he's just a bit curmudgeonly.
/r/TheRedPill19/05/13 06:51 AM
1

Most of what we talk about here is based on m/f sexual dynamics, but you can be gay and red pill at the same time. A lot of what we talk about here probably won't apply to you directly, but you can still benefit from the knowledge. I hope the OP heeds this. Being gay does not mean you never have to deal with the opposite sex. A trivial case in point: When I wait in the queue at the supermarket, I generally see the men in the queue retrieve their cards/cash before they reach the counter, then lea…
/r/TheRedPill19/05/13 06:49 AM
3

I am a straight man who has done theatre Closet case. /s
/r/TheRedPill19/05/13 06:38 AM
1

Homophobia success. Quit trying.
/r/TheRedPill19/05/13 06:35 AM
-1

LOL.
/r/TheRedPill19/05/13 06:25 AM
1

Thatcher is an ideal example: To those waiting with bated breath for that favourite media catchphrase, the 'U-turn', I have only one thing to say: 'You turn if you want to. The lady's not for turning.' MT didn't go looking for some schmuck to "take care of her." She was self-reliant.
/r/TheRedPill19/05/13 06:22 AM
1

It is all about how you present yourself to the world, and how you feel on the inside. FTFY.
/r/TheRedPill19/05/13 06:19 AM
0

When we talk about "Alpha" and "beta" in humans, what we're really talking about are women's perceptions of men based on whether they find them sexually attractive enough to fuck without some kind of ulterior motive requirement like money. Thank you! This is the most accurate and concise distinction I've encountered in years of discussing this stuff.
/r/TheRedPill19/05/13 06:17 AM
0

In b4 /u/ss_camaro ...
/r/TheRedPill19/05/13 06:14 AM
3

usually the one quality they had is calling straight beta males 'fags' which was hilarious. I love this. Mind you, the mainstream gay community would say it's a homophobic slur coming from a self-hating homosexual. Fuck that sort of intellectual dishonesty.
/r/TheRedPill19/05/13 05:46 AM
1

I'm not interested in the insane posturing and emasculation that goes on in the mainstream gay community, but at the same time I can't help feeling like an outsider in the "mainstream straight community" because I'm not interested in girls. I'm a bi guy, and I know what you mean. Just remember that the "mainstream gay community" you're taking about is the product of the 1970s feminist appropriation of the gay rights movement. There was a "gay community" in ancient Sparta, Athens and Rome (and in…
/r/TheRedPill19/05/13 05:44 AM
3

And how exactly is that different if she's 30? The mental age-gap just gets bigger with time.
/r/TheRedPill17/05/13 11:44 PM
1

That's two ways. Not "a lot".
/r/TheRedPill17/05/13 11:41 PM
3

The existence of the article, and the non-existence of a corresponding article from men's points of view, demonstrates the entitlement.
/r/TheRedPill17/05/13 11:40 PM
4

How outrageous, not treating girls to drinks. Somebody call the sex police.
/r/TheRedPill17/05/13 11:37 PM
3

Because it hurts women too! :/
/r/TheRedPill17/05/13 11:33 PM
4

No, they're chasing the top 25%. They started with 40%, remember?
/r/TheRedPill17/05/13 11:28 PM
1

She didn't say she was put off at all. I'm as cynical as the next guy here (cynical enough to renounce the female sex altogether), but I don't see a sense of being put off in this woman's post. Just bewilderment.
/r/TheRedPill13/05/13 02:28 PM
1

Is saving two letters really worth it?
/r/TheRedPill13/05/13 02:01 PM
1

Not all of them. All the hot ones tho.
/r/TheRedPill12/05/13 10:22 AM
4

I explained to her how nauseas it made me feel to imagine her with another guy. I know that feeling, this girl in one of my university study groups That i didnt even like or find attractive told me she thought black guys were funny and I got that same thing. You became nauseated because a girl you don't like and aren't in a relationship with said she thought black guys were funny? O.o Dude, get counselling or something.
/r/TheRedPill12/05/13 10:08 AM
2

Maybe we should ask them to put a link to /r/TRP in the sidebar ;)
/r/TheRedPill12/05/13 10:05 AM
1

Except that they don't need it for survival.
/r/TheRedPill11/05/13 05:39 AM
2

Historically the age was 10, IIRC. In the 19th century it began to rise, but always with an exemption for married couples. Then they started increasing the minimum marriageable age to increase the AOC by stealth.
/r/TheRedPill11/05/13 04:48 AM
5

The AOC is increasing incrementally in many places.
/r/TheRedPill11/05/13 04:47 AM
1

Japan.
/r/TheRedPill11/05/13 04:46 AM
1

They get satisfaction from it because they get money (i.e., readily transferable power) out of it. There doesn't need to be an evopsych explanation.
/r/TheRedPill11/05/13 04:00 AM
1

OK. I don't buy the evopsych stuff, so there we part ways. I think this behaviour simply occurs when a person (a) can get away with it and (b) can derive some sort of satisfaction from it. Most women can get away with this stuff a lot, hence they do it more.
/r/TheRedPill10/05/13 03:28 PM
1

You well know that I wasn't suggesting (seriously or otherwise) that you kill or otherwise harm your children. Your protest is disingenuous at best and manipulative at worst.
/r/TheRedPill10/05/13 01:53 PM
3

Perhaps women could instead be their own sources of financial support instead of seeking out hosts for that purpose. Or is that asking too much?
/r/TheRedPill10/05/13 09:12 AM
1

How do you know?
/r/TheRedPill08/05/13 12:09 AM
6

I'm sure that's true. Having said that, I'm a pretty short guy, and standard-size body-armour fits me just fine. Matter of fact, I think I benefit from better coverage.
/r/MensRights07/05/13 11:08 AM
-2

Well, not much does actually seem to be about sex with them, you gotta admit.
/r/MensRights07/05/13 11:07 AM
3

Bust variation is also going to affect sizing a lot even for women of the same height. I wonder if they wouldn't be better off scrapping the current design in favour of a hard, contoured ceramic plate over the whole breast area.
/r/MensRights07/05/13 10:35 AM
1

Maybe for women it's true.
/r/MensRights07/05/13 09:51 AM
5

Prussian blue.
/r/MensRights07/05/13 09:50 AM
3

80lb isn't going to melt off or stay off by magic.
/r/TheRedPill07/05/13 09:08 AM
7

I'm with you for once. I've been on 7000 cal/day beer diets and have never got anywhere remotely close to 195.
/r/TheRedPill07/05/13 09:05 AM
3

he was twice my size i am now when we got together EASILY. You're saying he weighed ~400lb?
/r/TheRedPill07/05/13 08:59 AM
2

The best thing you could possibly do without drowning the children is to lose ~65lb. (I'm a taller male and weigh less than 135lb.) That is a lot of weight, but with bariatric surgery (e.g., a lap band) it can be done. Forget conventional diet and exercise in this case.
/r/TheRedPill07/05/13 08:52 AM
2

i'm personality type INFP Well, from most men's point of view that is a nightmare.
/r/TheRedPill07/05/13 08:46 AM
1

Do you think it's important to let her know that I'll do it? She has the same entitlement to your honesty that you have to hers. Are you any more honest than she?
/r/TheRedPill07/05/13 08:20 AM
1

To stay together, I would sit her down and MAKE her tell me literally everything about what happened. The circumstances, why, how long, exactly what they did...everything. If she cannot handle that, you know it's time to move on. This is vital. If you won't face that - or, more significantly, if she won't - forget it.
/r/TheRedPill07/05/13 08:18 AM
1

Well, at least you need to start being careful.
/r/TheRedPill07/05/13 08:13 AM
2

I would be willing to get married if my prospective wife were from Ireland or the Philippines and we were living there. (The Philippines has no divorce legislation except for Muslims, and in Ireland I think you need to show separation for 4 of the past 5 years - effectively a looooong cooling-off period.) Nowhere else, for nobody.
/r/TheRedPill07/05/13 08:12 AM
-1

I still don't really fear marriage My nephew doesn't fear a loaded pistol, and that's one of several reasons why I won't be giving him one. Prenups are not worth the paper they're printed on if you have kids. Am I naive? O.o
/r/TheRedPill07/05/13 08:08 AM
1

You sound insecure. So you'd be OK with your girlfriend having an ongoing social relationship with an ex who feels comfortable asking her for permission to include their (past?) sexual exploits in a pornographic novel? Didn't think so. Neither would I. OP has every cause for concern about his girfriend's sexual habits. He just misconstrues the problems.
/r/TheRedPill07/05/13 08:05 AM
0

Jesus Christ.
/r/TheRedPill07/05/13 08:00 AM
6

"One" of her [supposedly 5] partners was in the FFM threesome. Well, there were 2 partners there. So we just learned that she doesn't count women as sexual partners. She probably also feels that only penis in vagina sex counts, so she has no need to disclose all the BJs she dished out on campus. Insightful and persuasive.
/r/TheRedPill07/05/13 07:59 AM
1

You're acting like kind of a dick.
/r/TheRedPill07/05/13 07:56 AM
1

Yes. Only a woman accustomed to one-night stands would see no reason to minimise her number.
/r/TheRedPill07/05/13 07:54 AM
3

In fairness, women do lie consistently less in anonymous surveys.
/r/TheRedPill07/05/13 07:52 AM
2

I think /u/Bobsutan is one of those people (see /r/fitness) who argue only anaerobic exercise is necessary. I bet he has a heart attack before you do.
/r/TheRedPill07/05/13 07:47 AM
6

Don't be condescending. It's not like there's a single school of thought on this.
/r/TheRedPill07/05/13 07:44 AM
2

Not true. Not unless 25+ is middle-aged.
/r/TheRedPill07/05/13 07:43 AM
7

don't really understand what a red pill is, but I do understand women. Would you mind hanging out on this sub a bit? We could use some advice from a rational and honest woman like you.
/r/TheRedPill07/05/13 07:38 AM
2

She had little reason to lie at that hookup stage Ever hear of playing hard to get? (Alphas are known to do it!)
/r/TheRedPill07/05/13 07:36 AM
2

TBH, I wonder if OP may be a troll. "Super-alpha" guys writing books about their sexual exploits don't seek girls' consent before publication. It started out as a one-night stand (first for her, not the first for me) LOL. Of course it was her first ONS! I made a common mistake at our early casual sex stage, asking about her sexual history. I don't think that was a mistake. I learnt that she had five partners before LOL+. Multiply 5 by 3 to get her approximate actual number, and then ask yourself…
/r/TheRedPill07/05/13 07:30 AM
1

How come you haven't caught it?
/r/TheRedPill07/05/13 07:18 AM
1

I highly recommend it! And, no, the same rules don't apply, because you're both sane.
/r/TheRedPill07/05/13 07:16 AM
1

Women stray because they use sex to get other things. Because so much of their interest in sex is as a gateway to other things, female cheating is likely to be more toxic to a relationship than male cheating.
/r/TheRedPill07/05/13 05:09 AM
3

Quite a few young men have endocrinological or other problems for which testosterone therapy is indicated.
/r/TheRedPill06/05/13 09:18 AM
1

Interesting point.
/r/TheRedPill30/04/13 04:47 AM
1

So you concede that women act this way? O_o
/r/MensRights30/04/13 02:35 AM
1

"Traits of X personality disorder" is the way the literature describes it.
/r/MensRights30/04/13 02:35 AM
1

Either accept conventional psychiatric literature - which recognises that borderlines are overwhelmingly female - or reject it. Don't cherry-pick.
/r/MensRights30/04/13 02:34 AM
1

Can't you imagine a society in which a class of persons is socialised to behave in a way you would regard as consistent with mental illness? In such a society, if that class were women, would it be misogynistic to describe the phenomenon?
/r/MensRights30/04/13 02:30 AM
1

I once saw this question posted (apparently quite ingenuously) on a BPD forum: Aren't all women borderlines?
/r/MensRights30/04/13 02:26 AM
1

Ouch. Painful but accurate.
/r/MensRights30/04/13 02:24 AM
3

Well, it sounds like your empathy is a bit selective but nonetheless present. Speaking personally, I feel as much empathy for animals and people on the other side of the world as I do for my friends. Maybe more.
/r/TheRedPill30/04/13 01:13 AM
1

/s
/r/TheRedPill30/04/13 01:04 AM
3

Unless you lack empathy you're no sociopath.
/r/TheRedPill30/04/13 12:59 AM
1

Plastic surgery is just nearing maturity as a surgical specialty.
/r/TheRedPill30/04/13 12:57 AM
1

To be fair, I don't think obesity is responsible for rising plastic surgery rates. You can't just liposuck obesity away. Bariatric surgery perhaps.
/r/TheRedPill30/04/13 12:56 AM
4

Polyandrous.
/r/TheRedPill30/04/13 12:54 AM
1

Idealised.
/r/TheRedPill30/04/13 12:46 AM
1

"Wow, this conversation that we are having about economics and politics over old fashoned's and martini's is really boring, let me check my phone" SAID NO MAN EVER. What is it with this? Why are so few women capable of holding a conversation about anything, you know, meaningful? I'm sure it's tied up with all the TV.
/r/TheRedPill29/04/13 08:40 AM
1

He can't hold down a job. He's a trust fund baby who has never had to have a job. He's got money issues, is always broke, or in major debt. He gambles. He hates his job and complains about it all the time. He loves his job and is dedicated to it 24/7. Seems like a lot of her dealbreakers are about money. This sample above basically excludes everyone - the rich, the poor, the lazy and the ambitious alike.
/r/TheRedPill29/04/13 08:31 AM
1

[Female vanity] warns of potential infidelity and long-term neediness. "The more selfies a girl has, the more obvious it is she craves validation," my friend Lindsay said. "The more validation she needs, the less likely it is that any one man will be able to give it to her." Sounds about right now.
/r/TheRedPill29/04/13 08:24 AM
1

Of course we did ultimately break up but that's mostly because I was a fucking cunt FTFY.
/r/TheRedPill29/04/13 08:14 AM
8

IMO Cheating is not a fault issue. It's not his fault, it's not even your fault. It's you reacting stupidly/incorrectly to your problems You assume that cheating happens because of problems "in the relationship" rather than (for example) because of one individual's lack of integrity. I don't accept that assumption.
/r/TheRedPill29/04/13 08:12 AM
1

There is simply no benefit to anybody to tell them at that point. Well, one obvious benefit is the cheater getting his social just desserts afterwards.
/r/TheRedPill29/04/13 08:12 AM
3

Idealistic? Really?
/r/TheRedPill29/04/13 08:04 AM
-1

Fuck at least guys are honest about what they want for the most part, THAT is what i would have liked to see from woman too Ha. Ha. Ha.
/r/TheRedPill29/04/13 07:59 AM
0

If this were true and women really cared so much, they could fix the problem completely by themselves since they are both the perpetrator and victim. What makes you think they want to fix the "problem"? They just like complaining. There's no nuance to it.
/r/MensRights28/04/13 03:21 PM
3

"Grant me chastity and continence, but not yet"?
/r/TheRedPill28/04/13 03:01 PM
0

Tolerated? They're encouraged. You go girl.
/r/TheRedPill28/04/13 03:15 AM
3

Chemical castration?
/r/TheRedPill28/04/13 03:12 AM
1

I agree on your second point. However, I doubt this Pope is willing to rely on people's innate benevolence to part them with their money.
/r/TheRedPill26/04/13 05:32 AM
2

Interesting. I share your view that rearing children is not a time- but talent-based activity. (I used to go to work with my parents.) I'm also inclined to agree about intelligence. Who among us can deny that (whatever the reason) heredity appears to predict intelligence well? The personality traits part is intriguing.
/r/TheRedPill23/04/13 08:17 AM
3

They need both dad and mom present They don't need to be at home all the time.
/r/TheRedPill23/04/13 08:15 AM
5

Every person needs a masculine father and a feminine mother to help them settle their identity. That alone will have the Left (including feminism) up in arms. Ironically, in many respects this new Pope is very appealing to the Left - he's much more a socialist than Ratzinger.
/r/TheRedPill23/04/13 08:13 AM
3

Neither does money alone.
/r/TheRedPill22/04/13 06:47 AM
3

And wealth without wits is just beta.
/r/TheRedPill21/04/13 03:04 AM
3

I don't think so. I know plenty of dumb rich men whose lack of intelligence undermines their capacity to be effective men.
/r/TheRedPill20/04/13 11:30 AM
1

unlike NK they have a proper military, even if they don't have the best gear they have decent gear and properly trained soldiers. Nobody in the West has any useful intelligence on the training or resources of the DPRK military. I mean, what are they gonna do if the US decides to napalm the entire nation? The DPRK leadership know what the US's limits are. Also, the crazy "Muslims" tend to be exclusively from Afghanistan or the US, places where illiteracy are high and/or they have access to weapon…
/r/MensRights16/04/13 06:52 PM
1

Just out of interest, any former carousel-riders among them?
/r/MensRights16/04/13 06:46 PM
1

The North Koreans play a weak hand exceptionally well. If they didn't, they'd have been bombed to bits a decade ago. Look what's happened to Iraq and Libya, which were both accused of trying to develop nukes about the same time as the DPRK. Look what's about to happen to Iran. Power comes out the barrel of a gun. The DPRK leadership knows that. They also understand US tactics far better than the US leadership understands theirs. The DPRK isn't a communist state. It's a theocracy. These people ar…
/r/MensRights16/04/13 06:31 PM
1

A sharp shift towards fiscal conservatism, I would predict.
/r/MensRights16/04/13 06:18 PM
1

I have a high regard for the country, particularly for its courage and self-reliance (the Juche ideal) in the face of adversity. I have known a number of North Koreans.
/r/MensRights16/04/13 06:17 PM
-1

Dramafest, pretend learning that vaginas exist is more traumatic than learning animals can die. I like this. The assumption that unwanted childhood sexual activity is inherently grossly traumatic is unfounded. It is also a self-fulfilling prophecy. Those who disseminate it would be wise to consider the possible consequences of their actions.
/r/MensRights16/04/13 06:13 PM
1

If the hamster can't run one way, it just runs in the other direction.
/r/MensRights16/04/13 06:10 PM
1

I read something good the other day. I think it might have been on reddit. "Forgiveness is accepting that the past cannot be changed."
/r/MensRights16/04/13 06:08 PM
-2

In the absence of any detail from OP, I'm going to call this childhood experimentation gone wrong. I don't think it's right to torment this girl now. I'd say the same thing if she were a boy. Have a heart.
/r/MensRights16/04/13 06:06 PM
1

They get civilised?
/r/MensRights16/04/13 06:03 PM
1

They sound like typical daughters of the antipodes - harsh, unsophisticated and masculine.
/r/MensRights16/04/13 06:02 PM
3

And unless it's OK to abuse non-human partners.
/r/MensRights16/04/13 05:55 PM
0

Sending CP to that email address there so that they can register my disgust.
/r/MensRights16/04/13 05:53 PM
-1

Men need to start standing up the feminarchy propaganda with guerrilla tactics. You bring the AKs and I'll make the Molotov cocktails.
/r/MensRights16/04/13 05:51 PM
-2

Straight men can only be perpetrators, potential offenders or bystanders. Women and fags can only be victims. Got it. /s
/r/MensRights16/04/13 05:49 PM
1

I'm a female with a high IQ and 120+ers aren't easy to come by. Male 120+ers are much more common than female ones.
/r/TheRedPill16/04/13 05:39 PM
2

Because it's girly. Just like women would be ridiculed for smoking cheap cigars and watching Nascar. Arbitrary gender roles suck.
/r/MensRights16/04/13 05:22 PM
1

I'm 5'7" (real 5'7"!) too. The weird thing for me has been that I didn't actually realise women cared about height until I took the red pill, even though I'm in my 30s. Because I've never felt short I've never "acted short" either. I would say that anything under 5'10" is disadvantageous.
/r/TheRedPill16/04/13 05:11 PM
2

i'm 5'6 without wearing shoes, so i just say 5'7 because that's how tall i am wearing shoes, LOL, I just got an inch taller.
/r/TheRedPill16/04/13 05:02 PM
4

This is the correct answer. I never met a 20-year-old women who said it. I never met a 60-year-old woman who said it. The women who say it are all themselves "in their sexual prime".
/r/TheRedPill16/04/13 04:55 PM
2

Also, unlike men, they don't have their testosterone dropping over time, reducing their libido. Oh yes they do.
/r/TheRedPill16/04/13 04:52 PM
8

Number of partners and level of experience are two different things.
/r/TheRedPill16/04/13 04:51 PM
1

Hard to see what it's got to do with ophthalmology ...
/r/TheRedPill16/04/13 04:45 PM
2

Women today don't want to be subject to compulsory military service. They never have done, they don't now, and they never will. Women are, however, quite happy to have an equal say in a social system into which they put less labour and resources.
/r/MensRights16/04/13 04:38 PM
1

Do I care about the DPRK? Yes.
/r/MensRights16/04/13 04:37 PM
1

Slut-shaming started as an effort by "good" women to oligopolise the market in sex.
/r/TheRedPill15/04/13 08:08 PM
2

Nonsense. You just argued a whole surgical speciality out of existence.
/r/TheRedPill15/04/13 08:00 PM
-1

Come off it. Women are just vain.
/r/TheRedPill15/04/13 07:58 PM
2

What's it to you? Let her have her boob job. Lots of people reconsider their aversion to plastic surgery when they start getting older.
/r/TheRedPill15/04/13 07:57 PM
0

/r/okc
/r/TheRedPill15/04/13 07:54 PM
1

The problem is that most female bipolars are borderlines in disguise.
/r/TheRedPill15/04/13 07:41 PM
1

I disagree. Few men sought to deny women the franchise.
/r/MensRights15/04/13 07:38 PM
1

I don't think that was fair to the DPRK.
/r/MensRights15/04/13 07:36 PM
1

I don't think Islam endorses "dancing boys".
/r/MensRights15/04/13 07:21 PM
2

Not to say ironical.
/r/MensRights14/04/13 10:26 AM
1

SF?
/r/MensRights14/04/13 09:50 AM
2

This article and others on the same site may help. BTW, many girls diagnosed as bipolar are actually borderlines but are given the bipolar diagnosis for insurance reasons.
/r/TheRedPill12/04/13 03:18 PM
8

Labels like bipolar and borderline are given to sluts to protect them from the consequences of their sluttitude.
/r/TheRedPill12/04/13 03:10 PM
1

After all, who dictates sexual attractiveness? Men do. For men as well ..
/r/TheRedPill11/04/13 05:33 PM
1

I consider any meta discussion that amounts to concern of the direction of the sub as concern trolling. Then, by your standard, you yourself are guilty of concern trolling. I did remove this topic because it is concern trolling nevertheless. That is censorship. That is one of the tactics of our enemies. He who would fight monsters would do well to take care, lest he become a monster himself.
/r/TheRedPill11/04/13 02:06 AM
2

I don't think you read my link ... I don't regard the moderators as authority-figures to whom infractions of unwritten rules should be "reported". Every subreddit has threads that relate to the way in which the subreddit functions as well as threads directly concerning the subject-matter of the subreddit. Your view seems to be that a thread about the functioning of the subreddit becomes concern-trolling when it makes your own position uncomfortable.
/r/TheRedPill10/04/13 03:04 PM
2

http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=concern+troll Patently not, if you can be bothered reading my comment history.
/r/TheRedPill10/04/13 02:46 PM
1

Whitewashing.
/r/TheRedPill10/04/13 02:42 PM
1

I don't think you can mainline crack.
/r/MensRights10/04/13 01:26 PM
2

I followed your first link. So you think homosexuality is a mental disorder?
/r/TheRedPill10/04/13 12:14 PM
2

That isn't even an argument against my objection...This isn't a democratic sub - we other readers don't get a say in who gets the contributor tag. Who gets the tag is irrelevant to the issue of whether /u/ss_camaro's conduct should be dealt with openly or hushed up behind the scenes. Further, the potential for conduct of this sort, with the weight of the title "Endorsed Contributor", is a powerful argument against the use of such tags at all. I thought around here we don't do that kind of public…
/r/TheRedPill10/04/13 12:05 PM
1

But /u/seeksthetruth1234 doesn't support the "Gay Agenda" any more than you or I do! Why seek to make an enemy of someone who wants to be your friend?
/r/TheRedPill10/04/13 11:46 AM
3

Why do fuck do we all have to love and agree with gay people? We don't. Why shouldn't we dismiss or attack people on the basis of their sexual preference? Because it's both irrelevant to the issues we discuss and incidentally hurtful. I don't mind gay people, not in life (if they are not obnoxious with their gayness) and not in here. ss_camaro does, for whatever reason and so what? Because it makes him a a bigot, and because he is being as irrational as the hamsters we regularly criticise here.
/r/TheRedPill10/04/13 11:43 AM
5

Because the idea of a public forum is that you do things in public.
/r/TheRedPill10/04/13 11:39 AM
3

It wasn't /u/RedSunBlue, it was /u/ss_camaro.
/r/TheRedPill10/04/13 11:38 AM
1

I think we're in heated agreement. Gay marriage is just another attention-seeking exercise. Marriage should be a religious or social institution only, with no legal force.
/r/TheRedPill10/04/13 07:45 AM
0

I have no idea what your agenda is, but if it's to discredit yourself and drive people away from /r/TRP it seems to be working.
/r/TheRedPill10/04/13 05:17 AM
2

Show me posts from TRP that are reasonable [...] I still won't believe you Arguing with those who have renounced the use of reason is like administering medicine to the dead.
/r/MensRights10/04/13 05:06 AM
1

Relevant.
/r/TheRedPill10/04/13 04:51 AM
2

You seem like a homophobe.
/r/TheRedPill10/04/13 04:44 AM
3

If you were gay, I think health concerns would demand that you be a bit more discriminating.
/r/TheRedPill10/04/13 04:37 AM
4

Unfortunately, our culture tells gay men that to be valued, they have to be like women. I think that's an evil part of our society. The result of the crossover between the feminist movement and the gay rights movement. I honestly think that the gay rights movement was the worst thing ever to happen to homosexual men. If you're going to dine with the devil, bring a long spoon.
/r/TheRedPill10/04/13 04:33 AM
3

heterosexual relationships are inherently oriented towards the creation and the regeneration of civilization, and I personally see homosexuality as a waste of masculine energy. That's only true if "heterosexual relationships" involve no birth-control, which seems a long way from the sex lives of most men here. If birth control is used, heterosexual and homosexual relationships are much of a muchness, so far as the "regeneration of civilisation" is concerned. If you're really attracted to the fem…
/r/TheRedPill10/04/13 04:28 AM
1

I initially suspected you might be a troll. Now I know you're not.
/r/TheRedPill10/04/13 04:19 AM
2

Have you ever met a girl who could accurately estimate the size of anything? I haven't. OTOH, I've met plenty who freely exaggerate their boyfriends' good points to acquire status.
/r/TheRedPill10/04/13 04:08 AM
2

So is height, but that advertises itself.
/r/TheRedPill10/04/13 04:03 AM
8

I'm wondering how the red pill would apply to my life as an alpha gay man? The fact that you don't have a sexual interest in women does not meant you don't deal with them all the time. You have female colleagues, family members, friends and other associates. You still have to put up with all their crap (e.g., the female entitlement culture), without even the potential payoff of getting sex at the end of it all! I would argue that in your particular circumstances taking the red pill is all the mo…
/r/TheRedPill09/04/13 03:36 PM
6

Although considered important by women, penis size is a trait that is of little practical importance. By the time she sees your penis she has already decided irrevocably whether to sleep with you (absent any medical problem). I wish that it were otherwise, and that I could use my plus-sized dick as a selling-point ...
/r/TheRedPill09/04/13 03:10 PM
11

(pnas.org) LOL.
/r/TheRedPill09/04/13 03:05 PM
14

This post on /r/TRP correctly picks OP as a concern troll.
/r/MensRights09/04/13 01:52 PM
1

Because their ideology is not so infected by cultural and economic Marxism.
/r/MensRights09/04/13 11:07 AM
1

She's a member of the Liberal Party of Australia (i.e., the Conservative/Republican party). Like most of her female party colleagues, she was excommunicated by the sisterhood a long time ago. tl;dr: in Australia, "Liberals" are actually conservatives.
/r/MensRights09/04/13 11:05 AM
1

I don't think that "in more cases than not" expresses a universal dichotomy.
/r/MensRights09/04/13 11:03 AM
1

Well, that would be a problem given all of the dual subscribers.
/r/MensRights09/04/13 10:58 AM
22

Half of them (e.g., me) comment in this sub too. Basically, /r/TRP subscribers are people who started out here but were looking for more thoughtful analysis than some of the links posted here (such as Facebook feeds). Many of the links are to blog articles in the manosphere (The Rational Male, Heartiste, etc.). /r/TRP is also more interested in developing techniques to make interacting with women more tolerable than in triggering political/social change (which is /r/MR's department). Also, they'…
/r/MensRights09/04/13 10:57 AM
8

You sound like a woman.
/r/MensRights09/04/13 10:52 AM
2

Nobody gets off on having their foreskin pleasured. I know from personal experience that this just isn't true.
/r/MensRights09/04/13 09:51 AM
1

They die earlier because they never go to the doctor.
/r/MensRights09/04/13 03:37 AM
1

TED and TEDx are just vehicles for Leftist propaganda.
/r/MensRights09/04/13 03:34 AM
9

In many ways they exhibit hyperagency, so that the female viewers can live vicariously through them.
/r/TheRedPill08/04/13 02:40 AM
2

It is her fault. She's willfully signed her human agency over to society.
/r/TheRedPill08/04/13 02:38 AM
3

She seems to have had a boyfriend at the time, so obviously this guy "pressured" her. /s
/r/TheRedPill08/04/13 02:36 AM
4

Women can stand up for themselves, but they don't, because it's easier to get someone else to do it.
/r/TheRedPill08/04/13 02:32 AM
1

I disagree with your sentiments, but that was funny.
/r/MensRights07/04/13 07:05 AM
1

I think they look good, especially with a high collar.
/r/MensRights07/04/13 07:03 AM
1

Yeah. Major in English, drama, women's studies, fine art? Sure. STEM? No thanks.
/r/MensRights07/04/13 05:28 AM
1

What exactly have they innovated in the last two generations?
/r/MensRights07/04/13 05:26 AM
1

what's the current feminist response [[ or general ]] to the statement of men are superior to woman physically? They claim that women have greater endurance and a higher pain threshhold. Both claims are untrue. However, women are (consistent with their reproductive role) much better placed to withstand starvation, given their substantial fat stores.
/r/MensRights07/04/13 05:21 AM
5

Or even: "Man cheats - woman gets angry. Woman cheats - woman gets angry."
/r/MensRights07/04/13 05:04 AM
2

In rural or old-fashioned areas of some countries one can do this; indeed, it is normal. China and the Middle East spring to mind.
/r/MensRights07/04/13 04:50 AM
1

They're animals.
/r/TheRedPill07/04/13 04:34 AM
2

So much hatred. And then we're meant to be the hate group. :/
/r/TheRedPill07/04/13 04:31 AM
17

tl;dr: women's insecurities must be pandered to and tiptoed around, while men must be harshly condemned for theirs.
/r/TheRedPill07/04/13 02:53 AM
2

The title alone makes me laugh.
/r/TheRedPill06/04/13 10:47 PM
1

Obviously the ratio is highest in men with lots of muscle and little fat. So much is a truism. Having said that, I have never met a heavily muscled man who was able to maintain a sub-10% body-fat percentage in the long term. However, I know several lean, well-muscled but lean men who are able to maintain a low-single-digits body-fat percentage. This class of men tends to have the highest muscle:fat ratio of all men I meet.
/r/TheRedPill06/04/13 05:34 AM
1

Then how does it stop downvote brigades?
/r/TheRedPill06/04/13 05:06 AM
1

Just BTW, are you "go at birth for Al Gore" or "goat-birth for Al Gore"?
/r/TheRedPill06/04/13 02:41 AM
1

Modern leftist intellectual liberals [2] aren't always classically liberal "Aren't always"? Try "are almost never."
/r/TheRedPill06/04/13 02:38 AM
1

I would like to point out they are probably there, you just aren't meeting them. Since they don't go out to bars and such, you aren't being introduced. As well, birds of a feather run together. You may know a wide variety of people, but if you only meet them out drinking, you are only gonna know those kinds of people. I don't go to bars much either. My job introduces me to women of all ages, classes and lifestyles, but I really only meet such girls when I go to the country. I live in a city of 4…
/r/TheRedPill06/04/13 02:09 AM
1

Most of the nurses I know got hitched to doctors.
/r/TheRedPill06/04/13 02:05 AM
1

I'm not seeing that, and I read virtually everything on this sub.
/r/TheRedPill06/04/13 01:55 AM
2

I see the downvote button has disappeared, so I can't express my dissent that way. Somehow we both got downvoted tho. Maybe the chosen still have access to the downvote button?
/r/TheRedPill06/04/13 01:53 AM
0

TBH I think this is a really bad idea. It will lead to insularity and ideological atrophy.
/r/TheRedPill06/04/13 12:23 AM
1

The vast majority of obese people are obese because of their lifestyle choices, e.g., drinking a liter of soda every goddamn day. Sugary soda is the worst culprit in obesity, worse even than alcoholic beverages. People who won't drink diet soda for fear of getting some imaginary cancer from artificial sweeteners will happily drink hundreds of calories a day in high-fructose corn syrup.
/r/TheRedPill05/04/13 01:04 PM
1

Fat girls are shooting themselves in the foot by not taking personal responsibility for their condition and instead complaining about thin privilege. It's so stupid. They act as though their weight is an insurmountable curse cast upon them by the universe, but they don't need to stay fat at all. They can diet rigorously (and perhaps become healthy as well as thin by exercising too). If they lack the willpower to diet properly, they can take diet pills. They can get surgery.
/r/TheRedPill05/04/13 10:06 AM
1

I read it as you saying you're significantly thinner than average and hence not biased by your own body shape.
/r/TheRedPill05/04/13 10:01 AM
1

What possesses people to think that they "deserve" things from the world at large? I blame the Left.
/r/TheRedPill05/04/13 09:58 AM
1

Maybe she should go on HCG ...
/r/TheRedPill05/04/13 09:54 AM
1

Well, if your wife is seriously overweight (and she's really serious about losing it), the only really viable options are surgical. A lap-band (what used to be called "stomach-stapling") or a gastric bypass is the solution. Even these can be overcome by a determined fattie, however: they just eat 10 tiny, highly calorific meals per day ... Also, don't cheat on your wife. Not without informing her, at least. (The "informing her" part might give her the nudge she needs.)
/r/TheRedPill05/04/13 09:46 AM
1

Country & western? :/
/r/TheRedPill05/04/13 09:42 AM
1

Do you live in a rural area? I don't know any girls like that, and I know a pretty wide variety of people.
/r/TheRedPill05/04/13 09:19 AM
1

Nurses deprived of male attention? I've got a bridge to sell you, dude.
/r/TheRedPill05/04/13 09:17 AM
2

Why is this downvoted? That was a misapplication of the ratio.
/r/TheRedPill05/04/13 08:52 AM
2

Dutch.
/r/TheRedPill05/04/13 08:51 AM
2

Thanks for the pointer to /r/leangains!
/r/TheRedPill05/04/13 08:48 AM
1

Because "anorexics" are BPD attention whores.
/r/TheRedPill05/04/13 08:42 AM
0

That is my personal experience, living in a large metropolis and visiting rural areas for work. In the country, fewer girls wear makeup, and those who do wear less.
/r/TheRedPill05/04/13 08:37 AM
7

Bingo. Got it in one. Women (like con artists) love ambiguity, because it permits them the maximum leeway in ex post facto rationalisation.
/r/TheRedPill05/04/13 08:25 AM
4

A lot of women would like men's behaviour to be legally regulated so that they never feel offended.
/r/TheRedPill05/04/13 08:20 AM
0

She's not really still shaking, she's just lying to play the victim and get sympathy.
/r/TheRedPill05/04/13 08:18 AM
0

Barely? I'm not saying she's fat, but she is definitely overweight.
/r/TheRedPill05/04/13 08:16 AM
0

Children are materialistic.
/r/TheRedPill05/04/13 08:06 AM
1

It's very hard to bulk up heavily without gaining fat. The highest muscle:fat ratio is found in relatively slender men.
/r/TheRedPill05/04/13 04:54 AM
1

20 years ago I was in college and campus was taken over by the Feminazis. LOL. Let's just say it was rough. We had no internet. It was me and a couple other guys getting followed around with bullhorns, with feminazis shouting, WHY DO YOU HATE ME? I remember this well. And they said that college would be the best time of one's life! What a joke.
/r/TheRedPill04/04/13 01:04 PM
0

Thats just an unfortunate part of many mra's psychology - "User pointing that I don't understand [some aspect of a feminist claim that I am totally strawmanning] - dur ... must be a woman". That isn't why I thought you were a woman. I've thought that for many months based on your writing style and interest in clothing. its normal to be horny, and its normal to sleep with people, over the years the numbers add up. What I'm asking is not why have sex; it is, Why change partners so often?
/r/TheRedPill04/04/13 12:46 PM
0

You're kidding! I've been sanctimoniously telling redditors you're a woman for ages! Why do it? Why churn through so many? I don't get it.
/r/TheRedPill04/04/13 12:16 PM
1

that figure is biased by women that are lying because of slut shaming It shouldn't be. That median of 6 is actually for both sexes, BTW, so any effects of women minimising because of "slut-shaming" should be approximately counteracted by men lying because of "virgin-shaming"! My own number is I estimate around 100, I know one fully uninhibited women who admits to an estimate of around 300 I'm assuming you're aged 30s or younger too. All I can say is that, in a weird sense, I'm impressed, even th…
/r/TheRedPill04/04/13 11:28 AM
2

I collected my clothes and kissed him on the cheek (I remember thinking how beautiful he was in the watery morning sunlight) Somehow the kiss on the cheek makes it a thousand times worse to me. Maybe it's because we blokes are sentimental.
/r/TheRedPill04/04/13 10:13 AM
3

Probably low self-esteem ... /s
/r/TheRedPill04/04/13 10:08 AM
1

It would be a selfless and noble act.
/r/TheRedPill04/04/13 10:05 AM
5

Worse than anywhere except Sweden and Canada.
/r/TheRedPill04/04/13 08:08 AM
3

You gotta be kidding. The feminist influence in Australia is overwhelming.
/r/TheRedPill04/04/13 08:07 AM
2

I know it's not warm (or rich ATM), but how about Ireland? (It's virtually impossible to get divorced there, if that adds any appeal.)
/r/TheRedPill04/04/13 08:06 AM
1

Even if he just ran a spell-checker ...
/r/askTRP04/04/13 05:06 AM
1

I don't know what you mean.
/r/MensRights04/04/13 05:00 AM
1

Others' priorities might be looks or a similar attitude to sexual morality. Yet you prescribe what "should" be valued.
/r/MensRights04/04/13 04:59 AM
1

I would have thought that domestic life were more conducive to focussing on one's career than a party lifestyle.
/r/TheRedPill04/04/13 04:53 AM
3

Yeah. The popular boys I went to high school with were mostly significantly smarter than average.
/r/TheRedPill04/04/13 02:36 AM
12

Hmm. So basically a boyfriend you don't have to have sex with.
/r/TheRedPill04/04/13 01:48 AM
2

It does exist, but it's pretty rare, and women are less likely to partake of it in my experience.
/r/TheRedPill04/04/13 01:42 AM
-1

Gay marriage is the death knell of marriage as a state institution. When it becomes common, the difference between gay and straight marriage will be that mainstream churches celebrate straight marriages but not gay ones. In those circumstances, conservative straight couples will begin to attach little weight to "state marriage" and quite possibly prefer religious marriage only.
/r/TheRedPill04/04/13 01:39 AM
5

If a woman has no/few sexual partners, her chastity is idolised. If a man has no/few sexual partners, he is a loser and looked down on.
/r/TheRedPill03/04/13 02:53 PM
1

The preponderance of the evidence (or the balance of probabilities for non-Americans) is not the standard of proof in a criminal case.
/r/MensRights03/04/13 02:41 PM
1

50% + 1 is not beyond reasonable doubt.
/r/MensRights03/04/13 02:40 PM
1

When we talk about whether someone's blond or brunette, we're not actually talking about the pigment their hair produces. We can't be, since we don't actually know what people's natural hair colour is and neither do they most of the time, we just assume it matches our perception of their hair colour.
/r/MensRights03/04/13 02:36 PM
1

/s
/r/MensRights03/04/13 02:29 PM
1

Not necessarily.
/r/MensRights03/04/13 02:26 PM
1

Value should be determined by looking at things like their personality, their intelligence level, whether or not you think they would make a good parent (if you want to have kids), if your interests match up, if they're supportive and loving... not if they've been in bed with someone other than you. Why? Why assume that others share your priorities?
/r/MensRights03/04/13 02:25 PM
1

Do you have the same assessment of men who have had multiple sexual partners? Kinda depends whether he has a sexual interest in men, doesn't it? There is no sexual double-standard by men on partner-count. The people judging a (female) prospective relationship partner's number are, almost by definition, not the people judging a (male) prospective relationship partner's number.
/r/MensRights03/04/13 02:24 PM
1

Unnecessarily rude, but you have a point.
/r/MensRights03/04/13 02:16 PM
1

"New friends" is girl-code for hookups.
/r/MensRights03/04/13 02:14 PM
0

women have it hard because a lot of men [...] either message you straight out asking if you want to have sex with them, or try to use your first "date" as an opportunity to immediately get in your pants, which is usually not what someone on a DATING site is looking for. I'm sorry to be the one to break it to you, but that is exactly what half of the population is looking for in a dating site.
/r/MensRights03/04/13 02:09 PM
1

Some women become addicted to having new partners and thus committing becomes next to impossible. I've never heard that from anyone, as far as I can recall. It's one of those unspeakable yet obvious truths.
/r/MensRights03/04/13 02:05 PM
1

E.g., http://socialpathology.blogspot.com.au/2010/09/statistical-adjustments-to-promiscuity.html
/r/MensRights03/04/13 02:00 PM
6

The feminist lobby want it banned in Australia too.
/r/TheRedPill03/04/13 12:50 PM
2

You'll grow up.
/r/TheRedPill03/04/13 01:15 AM
1

Insightful.
/r/TheRedPill02/04/13 02:41 PM
8

I've never understood why people don't do this.
/r/TheRedPill02/04/13 02:33 PM
10

This is an honourable subreddit.
/r/TheRedPill02/04/13 02:30 PM
6

The fact that so many act like whores does not change the definition of whore.
/r/TheRedPill02/04/13 01:34 PM
12

6 is the lifetime median.
/r/TheRedPill02/04/13 01:33 PM
3

Plus, 35 is kinda extraordinary. Who really believes that "many [...] women" have that many sexual partners?
/r/TheRedPill02/04/13 01:29 PM
13

They're children.
/r/TheRedPill02/04/13 01:26 PM
1

"trying" to get shit done. FTFY.
/r/MensRights02/04/13 03:54 AM
1

Your hypothesis is more plausible.
/r/MensRights02/04/13 03:52 AM
3

For women, yes.
/r/MensRights01/04/13 11:45 AM
1

You've got balls. I like that.
/r/MensRights01/04/13 02:44 AM
1

And it's "for your own good."
/r/MensRights01/04/13 02:36 AM
1

WW2.
/r/MensRights01/04/13 02:34 AM
1

You don't think men in that position pay in other ways? If you marry for money, you really have to work for it ...
/r/MensRights01/04/13 02:32 AM
1

Other countries don't think seeking sex with prostitutes is a mental illness warranting "therapy".
/r/MensRights01/04/13 02:31 AM
4

I think you're right.
/r/MensRights01/04/13 02:21 AM
5

It increases the chances of divorce.
/r/MensRights01/04/13 02:19 AM
1

Especially on this subreddit.
/r/MensRights01/04/13 02:18 AM
1

You joined a site for people looking for sex, and some people asked you for sex. What's the problem? Why is that "creepy"?
/r/MensRights01/04/13 02:14 AM
0

Do women find it attractive? Only to the extent that they find the novel attractive. That which was novel yesterday is humdrum today and will be stale tomorrow. At the end of the day, women have one very good reason not to adopt the proposed lifestyle. Think of the consequences: The man will develop an unquestionably closer relationship with the children, so he will probably get custody of them if there is a divorce. The man will be out of the workforce for 5 years or more (depending on how many…
/r/TheRedPill31/03/13 03:28 PM
-7

Find me a submissive slut [...]. You can’t do it. FTFY.
/r/TheRedPill30/03/13 03:49 PM
2

Lifestyle factors can't influence one's height, eye- or hair-colour, nor one's facial structure. Lifestyle just enables you to maintain the cards biology dealt you.
/r/MensRights30/03/13 01:55 PM
1

Are you saying that there is a significant number of people who appear to be the opposite of their chromosomal sex (not counting those who have had hormones or surgery)?
/r/MensRights30/03/13 01:49 PM
1

I agree. I suggest reviving "normal".
/r/MensRights30/03/13 01:44 PM
1

Perhaps feminism is influencing the news we get from there as much as it is for our own news. D'ya reckon? You've obviously never met an Indian feminist.
/r/MensRights30/03/13 04:32 AM
1

Small-minded xenophobia.
/r/MensRights30/03/13 04:31 AM
1

Which are you?
/r/MensRights30/03/13 04:29 AM
0

The problem is that sex basically is something that women give to men. Women don't want sex like men do.
/r/MensRights30/03/13 04:29 AM
0

Isn't the vagina an STD trap? Seems logical enough
/r/MensRights30/03/13 04:25 AM
-1

My wife could carry a carton of beer on her shoulder.
/r/MensRights30/03/13 04:22 AM
2

My dongle, right or wrong.
/r/MensRights30/03/13 03:56 AM
2

Yeah, it's aimed at 20- to 30-something rich guys.
/r/MensRights30/03/13 03:53 AM
1

Sorry, your last line contradicts the foregoing.
/r/MensRights30/03/13 03:51 AM
1

What about some therapy?
/r/MensRights30/03/13 03:50 AM
2

There was a thread in askmen recently, something about what their allegory of the ideal man was. All the top rated comments were about men who filled the gender role of the supporter, not men who actually respected themselves and got things done. Why do some people seem to think that /r/AskMen is for women to answer the questions?
/r/MensRights30/03/13 03:44 AM
0

I upvoted you both.
/r/MensRights30/03/13 03:30 AM
-4

He is a she, you nitwit.
/r/MensRights30/03/13 03:28 AM
2

Beautiful.
/r/MensRights30/03/13 03:21 AM
1

Attractiveness is mostly universal and is about physical ratios.
/r/MensRights30/03/13 03:18 AM
1

The thing is that that picture isn't even Hugh Jackman's real body. It's a computer-enhanced version. Even Hugh Jackman can't look like Hugh Jackman.
/r/MensRights30/03/13 03:06 AM
3

No. I won't celebrate killing people. BTW, don't think for a minute that the pro-abortion lobby gives a rat's ass about men's interests.
/r/MensRights30/03/13 02:59 AM
2

Based on this summary, benevolent sexism helps one's sex life. I don't think that's what any of us is practising ...
/r/TheRedPill30/03/13 02:44 AM
4

post-birth abortion ...murder? FTFY.
/r/MensRights30/03/13 02:13 AM
1

And result in a multi-million-dollar negligence lawsuit against the abortionist.
/r/MensRights30/03/13 02:12 AM
2

They're monsters.
/r/MensRights30/03/13 02:11 AM
1

Rape used to be confined to being vaginally penetrated by a penis. When I was a kid, non-consensually buggering a woman, forcing her to perform oral sex and vaginally penetrating her with an object were not rape. Likewise, it was not rape to perform any sex act on a man or boy. Those acts were all prosecuted as other offences (buggery, indecent assault, causing grievous bodily harm, gross indecency, etc.). Let's just say that society expanded the definition of rape of a woman more rapidly and mo…
/r/MensRights30/03/13 02:09 AM
1

Feminists had the funding slashed though and moved towards women only in the 60's and that's why you only see non-western articles about male birth control. I think it's got more to do with the fact that the same organ responsible for male fertility is also partly responsible for male arousal.
/r/MensRights30/03/13 02:04 AM
2

TBH, at this point I'd say that the medical profession is better off exploring easily reversible vasectomy (e.g., by using removable clips) than burning money on dicey hormonal solutions.
/r/MensRights30/03/13 02:02 AM
9

My God.
/r/MensRights30/03/13 01:11 AM
2

I've never been in the army, but that all sounds so petty. If I were the general I'd get rid of the signs and park with everyone else.
/r/MensRights30/03/13 01:05 AM
3

LOL.
/r/MensRights30/03/13 01:02 AM
1

Pregnancy isn't a disability.
/r/MensRights30/03/13 01:02 AM
4

"Benevolent sexism" again.
/r/MensRights30/03/13 01:01 AM
2

Some of the comments on your link are too good to be true: I was single for a long, long time – from the time I called off an engagement at 29 until I had my first date with my now-husband [...] a day before my 41st birthday.
/r/TheRedPill28/03/13 10:01 AM
2

There’s an inherent power differential here that makes “true” consent almost impossible. She's basically saying that since she doesn't have the power in the relationship anymore something has to be wrong. Ironically, you assume her statement about the power in the relationship to be true. If we're talking about an 8+, she knows she's hot and isn't in any hurry to find a sperm donor or provider. Why would she choose the 40-year-old lawyer over the 25-year-old band member? So that she can eat $150…
/r/TheRedPill28/03/13 09:50 AM
3

Precisely. The only difference is that 25-year-olds bring so much more to the table than ex-carousel 35+ women (who are also more likely to be immediately scheming for children).
/r/TheRedPill28/03/13 09:42 AM
3

I read this article through another link before I saw your ... analysis. OK, the article is wearing the unmistakeable parfum de hamster, but "Biology" is not an informed response to an equally uninformed contrary opinion.
/r/TheRedPill28/03/13 09:38 AM
3

And they would be right.
/r/TheRedPill27/03/13 03:32 PM
8

The majority of men are not Kinsey Ones or Kinsey Sixes. They are somewhere in between. When sexual opportunities with women become sufficiently unavailable or unappealing, some of the men in the middle of the Kinsey scale will start having more sex with other men. In the past, this situation has usually arisen through the physical isolation of an all-male community - the ship, the prison, the platoon. However, for the first time in history we now have (at least) a generation of women who provid…
/r/TheRedPill27/03/13 02:32 PM
8

So is a guy with a vasectomy. That doesn't make it a bad idea for him.
/r/TheRedPill27/03/13 02:16 PM
35

There's a button you click for that.
/r/MensRights25/03/13 02:50 PM
0

I get it now.
/r/TheRedPill25/03/13 01:52 AM
1

I'm not interested in wit. I'm genuinely interested in your answer, which you still refuse to provide.
/r/MensRights24/03/13 09:19 AM
1

When you answer the question I asked, I'll answer yours. You won't, of course.
/r/MensRights24/03/13 08:47 AM
1

Would you rather be sodomised with a metal rod or be sodomised by 6 penises with a plastic bag over your head?
/r/MensRights24/03/13 08:41 AM
0

The per-capita incidence of rape in South Africa is higher than in India. A minuscule minority of rapes in every country (except those too small to provide a sufficient crime sample) result in the victim's death. There is no pubic cause of death in the Delhi rape case.
/r/MensRights24/03/13 08:38 AM
1

I think it gets them more views because there are so many (usually well educated and successful) Indian immigrants in first-world countries, and people tend towards xenophobia.
/r/MensRights24/03/13 08:33 AM
2

It is a legitimate and historically common use of "sympathetic" to mean inspiring sympathy (not necessarily exhibiting it).
/r/MensRights24/03/13 08:32 AM
1

Rape is about power, not sex. Only a woman could come up with this line as applied to vaginal sex. However, if by "sex" you mean buggery, then I suspect power may be a significant (but probably not overwhelming) motivator.
/r/MensRights24/03/13 08:28 AM
1

Are you talking about Roissy or u/PurpleRight?
/r/MensRights24/03/13 08:23 AM
1

I think the niqab is more my style :)
/r/MensRights24/03/13 02:05 AM
1

I don't think this post actually questions or criticises feminism per se. Rather, it discusses feminist views as to the definition of rape on men.
/r/MensRights24/03/13 01:40 AM
2

Thanks for this contribution, Sigil1. It's nice to venture beyond the burqa.
/r/MensRights24/03/13 01:36 AM
-2

I was told India was the rape capital of the world ...
/r/MensRights24/03/13 01:03 AM
8

No, it's from the women's webzine of a major Australian media empire.
/r/MensRights23/03/13 04:10 PM
8

As a vegetarian MRA, I denounce Alecia Simmonds as a sexist nutter.
/r/MensRights23/03/13 04:06 PM
2

Pass the popcorn.
/r/MensRights23/03/13 02:58 PM
3

I think you can attribute the spelling to the effects of affirmative action on the South Africa police.
/r/MensRights23/03/13 01:22 PM
15

Whites are vastly overrepresented as crime victims in SA.
/r/MensRights23/03/13 01:21 PM
8

FYI, bakkie is a South African term meaning a ute/coupe utility, a type of pickup truck.
/r/MensRights23/03/13 08:45 AM
4

I don't think that proves it's not about vanity.
/r/TheRedPill22/03/13 04:30 AM
2

Actually, in my experience they prefer lean to big.
/r/TheRedPill22/03/13 04:26 AM
4

... All other things being equal, which they may not be.
/r/TheRedPill22/03/13 04:25 AM
4

Gawker perhaps?
/r/TheRedPill22/03/13 01:16 AM
0

It's so weird that women like the movie. It shows that they don't see anything amiss in the girl's behaviour.
/r/TheRedPill21/03/13 11:57 PM
1

What could be more red-pill than that?
/r/TheRedPill21/03/13 01:52 PM
2

Narcissistic condescension.
/r/TheRedPill21/03/13 01:50 PM
1

Sycophancy.
/r/TheRedPill21/03/13 01:35 PM
11

I think your wits are (or should be) a factor too.
/r/TheRedPill21/03/13 01:31 PM
2

I think that Alfie may ultimately be rather beta, great movie though it is. The protagonist starts out incredibly blue-pill, and loses his innocence in the course of the film, but given the extent of his betaness at the start he's coming off a pretty low level. While he loses that sense of trust in female companions, I don't think he ever develops sufficient insight into the social, biological and economic phenomena that we're concerned with.
/r/TheRedPill21/03/13 12:58 PM
3

Ultimately, though, Dustin's character is a total beta who tries unsuccessfully to prove his parental worth to the Family Court by feminising himself. And he gets to keep the kids not because of any doing of his but because of another whim on his wife's part.
/r/TheRedPill21/03/13 12:54 PM
-1

The Lady Vanishes The Thirty-Nine Steps The African Queen The Third Man Laura The Killing Vertigo Charade Lawrence of Arabia North By North-West Who's Afraid of Virginia Woolf? Marnie The IPCRESS File The Graduate The Conversation The Big Red One Raiders of the Lost Ark Breaker Morant An Officer and a Gentleman The Right Stuff *additions
/r/TheRedPill21/03/13 12:48 PM
1

They think (know?) that they're missing out on something.
/r/TheRedPill21/03/13 11:11 AM
1

I'm not sure it's defamatory to suggest that a person makes dirty jokes at tech conferences.
/r/TheRedPill21/03/13 11:08 AM
1

I'm surprised you created an account to make that comment. My question was a purely academic one, since I don't date women. I'm simply interested in discovering whether Game is worth all the effort to its practitioners. Why "shouldn't" a sexual encounter be somebody's endgame? Why is it "selfish" to want nothing but sex? (In fact, your characterisation of men who seek NSA sex with women as selfish seems to suggest that you believe women only want sex for ulterior purposes.) Who exactly is being …
/r/TheRedPill20/03/13 03:17 AM
-1

I agree somewhat. You can't change how many chromosomes you have. Of course, you can look and feel different (as a result of surgery and hormone levels respectively). OTOH, if people want to have plastic surgery or take hormones, I've got no problem with that. The status quo would be a bit like me (a slim white guy with light eyes) taking anabolic steroids to give me huge muscles, and Melanotan to darken my skin, and then demanding to be accepted as a large black man. (Transblack, anyone?)
/r/MensRights17/03/13 10:06 AM
2

For real?
/r/MensRights17/03/13 10:02 AM
-4

"Tranny" isn't a porn term. It has been used by transsexuals (who now want to be called trans(men/women)) to describe transsexuals since the 1980s (and probably since the 1970s).
/r/MensRights17/03/13 10:00 AM
1

Technically, that's "defence of another".
/r/MensRights17/03/13 09:58 AM
0

Because of this, they feel the uncomfortableness of guilt more strongly, painfully so, and so go through mental gymnastics to avoid it. No. Women can just get away with avoiding responsibility until the hit the Wall, and even then they can avoid plenty.
/r/TheRedPill16/03/13 05:45 AM
3

Every cloud has a silver lining.
/r/MensRights14/03/13 10:51 AM
3

For a second there I thought you were saying he had antlers and IRC.
/r/MensRights14/03/13 10:49 AM
1

I don't know whether to laugh or to cry.
/r/MensRights14/03/13 10:45 AM
1

Do you think that chasing modern women offers a man anything that prostitution doesn't? How much time (which equals money) does an average 30-something man with reasonable Game typically have to invest for a return of one sexual encounter?
/r/TheRedPill13/03/13 03:38 AM
0

Can you read? I said: Last time I looked, there were twice as many men who identify as gay as there are women. Lesbians are gay women, and they're pretty rare.
/r/MensRights10/03/13 06:39 AM
1

The former Soviet bloc.
/r/MensRights10/03/13 05:14 AM
-1

there's also the obvious: that many lgbts are women. Stats please. Last time I looked, there were twice as many men who identify as gay as there are women.
/r/MensRights10/03/13 04:50 AM
5

It's not just coincidental that black women are dealt the weakest hand in the game of feminine sexual supremacy.
/r/MensRights10/03/13 04:39 AM
9

No young woman would consent to having sex with five guys in a bathroom unless she was seriously troubled. I thought it was called "just expressing her sexuality" these days?
/r/MensRights10/03/13 04:37 AM
1

The very thing that makes us attracted to them, their beauty, soft heart, femininity, tenderness makes that makes them excellent for child rearing, support, sex and companionship (traits we like) makes them utterly incapable of doing things at a similar or greater level to a man outside of these select areas. This does not describe the modern, Anglo-American women we usually discuss here.
/r/TheRedPill10/03/13 03:41 AM
2

The bodybuilding.com forums rock!
/r/MensRights09/03/13 04:17 PM
1

But once she's got him ...
/r/TheRedPill09/03/13 01:57 AM
0

"Propping up the male ego?" Haha.
/r/TheRedPill09/03/13 01:54 AM
1

The site disappeared.
/r/TheRedPill09/03/13 01:47 AM
1

I'd give them ten years, like most other guys.
/r/TheRedPill08/03/13 03:47 PM
1

Like all those harems that impoverished postwar Germans and Japanese presided over?
/r/TheRedPill08/03/13 03:40 PM
4

Ironically, most men couldn't care less if women all wore hemp sacks.
/r/TheRedPill08/03/13 03:37 PM
4

You can't have a "wife" and still be happy in 10 years - except maybe if you're a talented divorce attorney. The scenario you want can only be achieved by refusing to make it profitable to dump you. Marriage kinda gets in the way of that.
/r/TheRedPill08/03/13 03:10 PM
1

Even most redditors don't seem to have realised this.
/r/MensRights08/03/13 09:44 AM
-1

There's nothing suggesting his actions were based on her movements (or the other way around). Where do you get that from?
/r/MensRights07/03/13 03:53 AM
1

Except they don't actually want that, as they couldn't continue their parasitism.
/r/MensRights07/03/13 02:54 AM
1

First comment of yours I've ever disagreed with.
/r/MensRights07/03/13 02:52 AM
-1

So, woman felt scared so he must have been "suspicious"? Please. If anyone in this transaction was suspicious, it was she.
/r/MensRights07/03/13 02:50 AM
1

Even if you're right, what's suspicious? Maybe he wanted to ask her out (or ask for directions) but saw the irrational fear on her face when he approached.
/r/MensRights07/03/13 02:48 AM
1

I really don't care if calling a spade a fucking shovel makes us look bad.
/r/MensRights07/03/13 02:45 AM
1

I've read it, of course. There's no call to resort to underhanded argumentative techniques like appeal to ridicule. I was hoping to have an open and honest discussion about the aetiology of the asymmetry.
/r/TheRedPill06/03/13 05:06 PM
2

This is a bit of a dilemma. I suppose you only need to make her suspect you of violating the rules of the relationship. You could just imply that you're getting on very well with various hot women.
/r/TheRedPill06/03/13 03:38 PM
1

Um ...
/r/TheRedPill06/03/13 02:34 PM
1

I'm not actually trying to disprove anything, just giving my take on the situation that confronts us all. (I don't really accept any part of evolutionary psychology. I think it's a pseudoscience, but we're all entitled to our opinions of course.) Much of what I've said is fairly anodyne, I would have thought. If what you're seeking support for is the proposition that the female sex drive is lower, look here: http://carlsonschool.umn.edu/Assets/71520.pdf and http://www.hawaii.edu/hivandaids/Gende…
/r/TheRedPill06/03/13 05:25 AM
4

It's a start. It would catalyse a change in social expectations.
/r/TheRedPill06/03/13 02:47 AM
3

Stop caring whether she remains your wife. Oneitis is betaness. *Oh, and never beg for sex. Just try and take it (up to the point where she physically resists).
/r/TheRedPill06/03/13 02:42 AM
1

This leaves me scratching my head, given Wikipedia's gross feminist bias.
/r/MensRights26/02/13 07:31 AM
2

He seems like a nutter ...
/r/MensRights25/02/13 04:33 PM
6

The projection is strong with this one.
/r/MensRights25/02/13 08:43 AM
1

That's not the reason. You can "still look pretty in your coffin" by gassing, hanging, shooting in the chest etc., etc.
/r/MensRights25/02/13 02:52 AM
1

But men are diagnosed with some other PDs at higher rates than women ...
/r/MensRights25/02/13 02:50 AM
-2

Isn't this because they use more successful, violent methods (aka, guns) than females? Ask yourself why women use less successful methods.
/r/MensRights25/02/13 02:47 AM
1

It also seems to indicate that female "suicide attempts" are often not intended to work.
/r/MensRights25/02/13 02:46 AM
1

They almost never do, as any interested person with basic education will discover.
/r/MensRights25/02/13 02:42 AM
0

Those are indeed the only two explanations. My opinion of women's intelligence is not so low as to attribute their "failure" to that. Everybody knows that guns are effective. Women rarely use guns.
/r/MensRights25/02/13 02:41 AM
1

there are tons of studies that confirm this. Cite them please. Then explain why they can't just do it anonymously.
/r/MensRights24/02/13 05:08 PM
2

Cheating isn't cool. The "it" JabCross referred to was the "Harvard" you referred to.
/r/MensRights24/02/13 05:06 PM
2

LOL. I didn't click, but I bet this is GWW ..
/r/MensRights24/02/13 04:35 PM
3

They weren't so picky 100 years ago.
/r/MensRights24/02/13 04:00 PM
0

Plastic surgery?
/r/MensRights24/02/13 03:49 PM
8

... Because they're not old and don't expect to be for longer than they can imagine.
/r/MensRights24/02/13 03:45 PM
5

Redditor with no history ...
/r/TheRedPill24/02/13 03:37 PM
2

Where are you from?
/r/MensRights23/02/13 01:06 PM
6

For murder I think it's pretty standard.
/r/MensRights23/02/13 01:06 PM
1

Or change the sexes of the kids.
/r/MensRights23/02/13 03:29 AM
1

Report back on the reactions once you've posted it.
/r/MensRights23/02/13 03:28 AM
1

Meanwhile, this author(ess) notes that the Pistorius case functions as a vessel into which people pour their own agendas and prejudices: http://guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2013/feb/22/pistorius-case-empty-vessel-prejudices
/r/MensRights23/02/13 02:38 AM
1

High-caste Indian women are among the most superior and entitled on earth.
/r/MensRights23/02/13 02:27 AM
1

just couldn't do it. You might need to work on that. Your next lay might be Aileen Wuarnos II.
/r/MensRights23/02/13 02:25 AM
1

Excessive?
/r/MensRights23/02/13 02:19 AM
2

Also, birth order would appear to support a nurture theory as much as a nature one.
/r/MensRights23/02/13 02:15 AM
2

What birth order makes me bisexual?
/r/MensRights23/02/13 02:12 AM
1

Even tho you were one?
/r/MensRights23/02/13 01:51 AM
1

They don't stop?
/r/MensRights23/02/13 01:43 AM
7

What about the children!
/r/MensRights23/02/13 01:13 AM
1

I know how to science, thanks, and the idea that homosexuality is genetic is a sacred cow. Sacred cows have no place in science.
/r/MensRights23/02/13 01:05 AM
1

... And, in the end, it comes down to envying her female friend.
/r/TheRedPill21/02/13 01:21 PM
1

It depends what state you're in.
/r/MensRights17/02/13 10:22 AM
1

Some people think their own hang-ups trump other people's rights.
/r/MensRights14/02/13 06:42 AM
1

How can he prove that MGM is not child abuse?
/r/MensRights14/02/13 06:41 AM
0

Admittedly, it's a bit much to expect him to prove a negative. The burden of proof rests with you.
/r/MensRights13/02/13 04:07 PM
0

More screen time is devoted to depicting the female violence against men than any male violence against women, and it is filmed so as to suggest that the violence against men is a positive thing.
/r/MensRights13/02/13 06:46 AM
0

Have you seen the Swedish film I'm talking about?
/r/MensRights13/02/13 06:25 AM
0

Sorry, it was buzz7441's comment, not yours.
/r/MensRights13/02/13 06:21 AM
-2

I'm not stopping anyone speaking. I'm pointing out that your comment was not germane to his post.
/r/MensRights13/02/13 04:34 AM
1

realpolitikalisch
/r/MensRights13/02/13 04:32 AM
2

I guess people enjoy being a 'part' of something. The source of so many of the world's ills.
/r/MensRights13/02/13 04:30 AM
1

You think Brisbane is bad? Try Canberra.
/r/MensRights13/02/13 04:27 AM
1

I moved to Canada, and things are slightly more sane here. Jesus. I think of Canadian feminism as even worse than the Australian brand.
/r/MensRights13/02/13 04:26 AM
2

Is Kaz Cooke a feminist? I think of her as an author of young adult fiction who happens to be read by more girls than boys. I read her stuff when I was a kid.
/r/MensRights13/02/13 04:25 AM
3

Sooner or later people will wake the fuck up, open their eyes, and realize that the feminism that is out there actually using the social power that feminism grants, are not their ideal vision of a "good" feminist. The hell they will. Feminists are telling women what they want to hear. People can't get enough of that shit. People will wake up when the whole thing starts to fall in a heap. Which I think will be in about 15-20 years' time.
/r/MensRights13/02/13 04:23 AM
1

How old are you? Whence comes all this wisdom?
/r/MensRights13/02/13 04:12 AM
2

Thank you for the first quote. I need to bear it in mind more often.
/r/MensRights13/02/13 04:11 AM
1

Self-fulfilling prophecies are powerful things.
/r/MensRights13/02/13 04:10 AM
1

Get some real friends.
/r/MensRights13/02/13 04:10 AM
9

Most women I have known intimately preferred cut and don't like uncut. It's odd that you said men preferred it then. Your intimate female partners would hardly tell you they preferred uncircumcised penises when yours is circumcised, would they? In any event, many women don't even know the difference, and nor do many men. Many uncircumcised American men think they are circumcised, and vice versa. I want my son to have the best chance at getting laid he can. By the time she sees it, she's already …
/r/MensRights13/02/13 04:02 AM
5

No, I meant this weird idea: "I, a straight man, prefer circumcised penises, so I'm going to have plastic surgery performed on my son so that his penis is more attractive to me."
/r/MensRights13/02/13 03:50 AM
1

I don't think she did that on her show, did she?
/r/MensRights13/02/13 03:47 AM
2

If anything we should be complaining about the demonisation of straight male sexuality. We are doing so regularly, and one of the grounds for complaint is that there is a double standard.
/r/MensRights13/02/13 03:46 AM
-2

So?
/r/MensRights13/02/13 03:38 AM
2

We're talking about language.
/r/MensRights13/02/13 03:35 AM
1

most guys I know prefer it which is why they do it to their kids. Do you know how weird this sounds?
/r/MensRights13/02/13 03:34 AM
3

The post is about the use of language, not about harms/benefits/feelings about circumcision.
/r/MensRights13/02/13 03:34 AM
-1

The Girl With the Dragon Tattoo (I've only seen the Swedish version) was basically an orgy of female violence against men. Much of the (female against male) violence was sympathetically portrayed, and presented so as to be relished by the viewer. (Ironically, the Swedish title means "Men Who Hate Women". The content is actually the other way around.) For DV (of a kind) I would look at Misery or Thelma and Louise.
/r/MensRights13/02/13 03:31 AM
7

Absolutely irrelevant to this post.
/r/MensRights13/02/13 03:17 AM
4

saying it isn't mutilation is like getting offended when someone says eating fast food makes you fat. What if they referred to fatness as a "disease", "morbidity" or "dysmorphia"? Plus, fatness is completely reversible. Circumcision is only partly reversible. I don't think he's saying that using the word "mutilation" is incorrect. He's saying it's insensitive and potentially counter-productive.
/r/MensRights13/02/13 03:16 AM
5

soon boys who are circumcised will be dealing with what uncircumcised boys were dealing with in locker rooms when I was a child. The times, they are a'changin'. OR and NV are down around 10-15% neonatal circumcision now. Not being from the US, I fortunately avoided the bullying you describe. It sounds just awful. I don't know which is worse: being bullied for having what God gave you, or being bullied because you had the misfortune to lose some of what God gave you.
/r/MensRights13/02/13 03:12 AM
0

People in your position have no need to pussyfoot with their language.
/r/MensRights13/02/13 03:10 AM
3

Maybe we could call FGM "female circumcision" as we used to, back in the 1980s and early 1990s?
/r/MensRights13/02/13 03:09 AM
5

People who use the word mutilated in this context are alienating the people they think they're helping. I think circumcision is technically a mutilation (like tattooing), but I agree with you that we shouldn't refer to circumcised men as "mutilated". I've been asking people to be a bit more sensitive about this for a while. Why would we want to alienate the very people we are relying on not to do this to their sons? There is no purpose in preaching to the converted. I think it's reasonable to ca…
/r/MensRights13/02/13 03:07 AM
0

... While most studies of IQ indicate the exact opposite.
/r/MensRights13/02/13 03:01 AM
-2

Google is your friend.
/r/TheRedPill12/02/13 12:16 PM
1

God, you're good.
/r/MensRights12/02/13 04:19 AM
7

well in fairness, there are a lot of "straight" gay guys in relationships with women. Some, sure, but it's not 1955 any more. I think if a woman finds gay porn in her boyfriend's browsing history it's more likely that he's bisexual or just curious than that he's living a lie.
/r/MensRights12/02/13 03:54 AM
1

I don't get it, why bother having a "boyfriend" in the first place? What's the motivation? To keep up appearances? To demonstrate to others that somebody desirable loves her, that she is "normal".
/r/MensRights12/02/13 03:02 AM
2

In their culture being found in a "compromising position" is a euphemism for being found with your penis in someone's vagina.
/r/MensRights11/02/13 02:01 PM
2

The former means the latter.
/r/MensRights10/02/13 01:33 AM
8

In fairness, it's pretty hard to get it done professionally in the UK (and rightly so). The overwhelming majority of doctors would refuse.
/r/MensRights10/02/13 01:31 AM
1

I know lots of Jews, Christians and atheists who criticise Islam freely. Christopher Hitchens was somewhat known for it.
/r/MensRights09/02/13 04:08 PM
0

This is a problem that MRAs who embrace left-wing causes will find themselves experiencing again and again.
/r/MensRights09/02/13 03:48 PM
1

Women in India have numerous legal and social advantages over men. Google how can she slap.
/r/MensRights07/02/13 09:23 AM
1

Thanks for brightening my day.
/r/MensRights07/02/13 09:20 AM
1

A higher proportion(not all) of bisexuals were abused as children by a member of the same sex. How much higher? What is your source for this? What is the relevance of the abuser's sex? Do you suggest that bisexuality is created by child abuse? People who are abused in childhood are at a greater risk of sexual assault in adulthood. What is the relevance of this? Do you suggest that bisexuals are more likely than others to abuse children?
/r/MensRights07/02/13 09:17 AM
0

I didn't say they were, did I?
/r/MensRights04/02/13 02:13 AM
1

Harassment? Death threats? Yes to both.
/r/MensRights04/02/13 02:03 AM
1

TIL. Presumably they don't have a problem with slightly flat-footed, asthmatic lawyers, then? Maybe I should join the US military to help get permanent residency/citizenship.
/r/askTRP03/02/13 12:56 PM
0

Maybe they should restrict the military to black men.
/r/askTRP03/02/13 07:58 AM
1

You can join the US military when you're disabled? O.o I'm in excellent physical condition, but because I'm slightly flat-footed and suffer from (well controlled) asthma I couldn't join the Australian Army if I wanted to, despite easily surpassing all physical fitness tests ...
/r/askTRP03/02/13 07:56 AM
0

All speech should be tolerated. That's what I think, and that's what virtually all those who have responded to your authoritarianism think.
/r/MensRights03/02/13 03:06 AM
0

I normally prefer to be polite, but fuck you and your censorship.
/r/MensRights02/02/13 05:03 PM
1

Not on this subject at this particular point in time.
/r/MensRights01/02/13 08:16 AM
1

The point at which I (at any rate) stop being sensitive to people's feelings is the point at which to do so would stop me speaking what I believe to be the truth.
/r/MensRights01/02/13 08:11 AM
7

TIL.
/r/MensRights31/01/13 05:31 AM
2

/s?
/r/MensRights31/01/13 01:31 AM
5

And you're better suited to being an astronaut or a sailor in a submarine.
/r/MensRights30/01/13 02:22 PM
1

Wear heels too?
/r/MensRights30/01/13 02:19 PM
1

I very much doubt that 35+ women get that level of interest.
/r/MensRights28/01/13 02:31 PM
1

Probably more profitable than working at Pizza Hut too.
/r/MensRights28/01/13 02:15 AM
1

OK, I'm through. Nice troll tho. Have a good day.
/r/MensRights27/01/13 04:25 PM
1

Women have plenty of options well into their 50s. I'm sorry, but I'll need a citation for this. It contradicts everything in the manosphere and my own experience.
/r/MensRights27/01/13 04:22 PM
1

What a homophobic, sour little piece of writing.
/r/MensRights27/01/13 04:20 PM
1

It follows that such a society (one that legitimises sexytimes with Bill) is likely to be less reproductively successful than a society that stigmatises such sexytimes, arguably explaining the near universality of the homosexuality taboo.
/r/MensRights27/01/13 03:39 PM
7

There are dozens if not hundreds of MRM and FRM sites, and if "young feminists" of each generation have been going around the web posting false contact information like this as a prank, we don't want to alert the contact people that we're onto the game. It's not like you'd post about it on reddit or something.
/r/MensRights27/01/13 09:10 AM
1

I'm not "countering your point." I'm trying to correct your misconceptions as to the state of the law.
/r/MensRights27/01/13 09:01 AM
1

SEALs:Infantry ratio is very, very unbalanced. Thats why I said: What proportion
/r/MensRights27/01/13 09:00 AM
1

It seems counter-productive to exempt a person from protection under the law based on marital status. At last we agree on something. On what basis? On the basis that women can't be allowed to contract with their husbands to their own potential detriment.
/r/MensRights26/01/13 09:35 AM
1

I think all men between 18 and 35 have historically been liable to conscription. In Vietnam, when they didn't "need" as many as WW2, they had a ballot, not physical training assessment.
/r/MensRights26/01/13 09:34 AM
1

What proportion of SEALs have been KIA in the last 10 years? What proportion of front-line infantry personnel?
/r/MensRights26/01/13 09:31 AM
1

It depends what sort of court case you want to have. I was assuming the defence of a criminal prosecution for failing to register. But I suppose you could file suit seeking a declaration that you are not required to register. So, in short, probably (if you haven't already registered).
/r/MensRights26/01/13 09:29 AM
1

Not many girls subscribe to game theory.
/r/MensRights26/01/13 02:08 AM
7

The heart of the problem. Believe what women say attracts them? Nice guy loser. Thinks it's nonsense and that actions speak louder than words? Sexually successful asshole.
/r/MensRights26/01/13 02:06 AM
1

Solution for hairdressers: charge by time instead of sex, and everything will be back to normal.
/r/MensRights25/01/13 02:56 AM
1

don't stay strictly monogamous or hetero just to fit in or protect yourself, because it will make your options and relationships even better and more equal, or clear away what limits you. This x 1000. If I were a purely straight guy I'd be fucked (figuratively ... literally not so much.)
/r/MensRights25/01/13 02:53 AM
1

Nice line!
/r/MensRights25/01/13 02:51 AM
0

Ant-abortion MRA checking in.
/r/MensRights25/01/13 02:50 AM
5

You're asking him to put his access to student loans and other social benefits on the line by failing to register. Test cases need a plaintiff who won't actually lose that much if his argument fails.
/r/MensRights24/01/13 12:49 PM
12

But once drafting occurs the best still have to be selected. Historically, everybody without medical impairment has been "selected", giving the lie to your assertion that they are "the best." The best become Navy SEALS. The AFCs become infantry cannon-fodder. Physically 90% of these will be men 90% of Navy SEALS, yes. Women are as competent to be cannon-fodder as men.
/r/MensRights24/01/13 12:45 PM
1

No, you need to execute it in the context of a marriage, and statute law provides that contract law does not apply.
/r/MensRights24/01/13 05:38 AM
1

I wish I were a millionaire. Doesn't stop me taking pride in who I am.
/r/MensRights24/01/13 05:37 AM
5

... And then they call us a hate group.
/r/MensRights23/01/13 07:02 AM
1

How so? "Prole" is a common abbreviation for proletarian.
/r/TheRedPill22/01/13 05:50 AM
1

Yes, half or more of these women are women we're not concerned with. If we assume we're concerned with, say, 40% of women, the 7% figure becomes closer to 20%.
/r/TheRedPill22/01/13 05:49 AM
1

but they didn't like this setup and refused. I think they prefer to do it in secret, which I don't know why Because the illicit quality, and the fantasy that they might score the alpha as a boyfriend, is what they like. If you sanction it, it ruins both the illicit quality and the fantasy.
/r/TheRedPill22/01/13 05:47 AM
10

Another one here.
/r/MensRights21/01/13 02:55 AM
5

You are not only welcome in the MRM, you are in a unique position to advance it. Many guys here wish they were gay! *sp
/r/MensRights21/01/13 02:51 AM
1

It depends what its legal nature is.
/r/MensRights21/01/13 12:20 AM
-1

Morally it doesn't matter whether it's a crime or not. Abortion used to be a crime after all. Don't be condescending or I won't interact with you.
/r/MensRights20/01/13 04:31 PM
2

You're a card.
/r/MensRights20/01/13 04:20 PM
1

"and you have exhausted your men's patience"
/r/MensRights20/01/13 03:57 PM
-6

I think people are fine with anti-paedophile activists, so long as they do not try to enforce their views on others. It is about freedom of choice, for everyone. See how that works?
/r/MensRights20/01/13 03:52 PM
1

Well, in that case it seems that our views are identical. I wouldn't enter into a relationship with someone who wasn't an "academic" either.
/r/MensRights20/01/13 03:41 PM
1

Well, doesn't calling a non-graduate without university affiliation, studying privately, an "academic" stretch the definition a bit?
/r/MensRights20/01/13 12:44 PM
-11

And speaking as a 6' guy, it's pretty easy for me to pass women. LOL, okay.
/r/MensRights20/01/13 12:38 PM
1

My field is the law, but I pursue knowledge in at least half a dozen other fields in which I would consider myself competent.
/r/MensRights20/01/13 12:22 PM
1

I'm sorry, but you are mistaken about basic facts and principles here. The article isn't really very helpful in that it employs somewhat ambiguous terminology. There was no contract in the contract law sense. There was a statutory spousal agreement (a post-nup) under family law legislation. Principles of contract law do not apply to this case. The judge set aside parts of the spousal agreement pursuant to provisions of the family law legislation. Once more, this is not a contract law case. If yo…
/r/MensRights20/01/13 12:17 PM
1

My career consists mostly of reading, thinking and writing. So does mine, with the addition of public speaking. Academia isn't the only place where people have intellectual careers. And I need an SO who gets that and whom I can discuss my work with. Unless you are (say) a Romance-language philologist and insist on dating only other Romance-language philologists (or perhaps even those Romance-language philologists who specialise particularly in morphology as opposed to phonology), there is absolu…
/r/MensRights20/01/13 11:54 AM
2

Not really, IMO. You make vague references to "a specific type of education that turns out to be crucial for me." That doesn't explain anything, unless it's code-speak understood only by Oxbridge alumni or something.
/r/MensRights20/01/13 11:43 AM
1

Clearly it must be my professional-school-only lack of academic education. Maybe you can enlighten me.
/r/MensRights20/01/13 05:00 AM
1

This thing is great! Men are transformed into ineffectual hand-wringers, and women into no-nonsense pragmatists. Hilarious. I'm so glad I installed it.
/r/MensRights20/01/13 04:59 AM
1

No, I'm saying that contract law doesn't apply to spousal agreements. Just family law.
/r/MensRights20/01/13 02:09 AM
1

What does the "social" part mean then?
/r/MensRights20/01/13 01:12 AM
11

It can be indicative, just not conclusive.
/r/MensRights20/01/13 12:34 AM
1

Is your username your Myers-Briggs type? Sincerely, ENTJ.
/r/MensRights19/01/13 02:37 PM
1

I read it. I can't be the world's only autodidact, tho.
/r/MensRights19/01/13 12:50 PM
3

They won't be alone, they'll just get pumped and dumped a lot. Once they hit 35 or so most won't even get that from an alpha, who'll be looking for someone younger. In the West, female life expectancy is in the mid-80s. Fifty years is a long time.
/r/MensRights19/01/13 08:25 AM
5

Never thought of it that way!
/r/MensRights19/01/13 08:10 AM
1

Volksbefragung = plebiscite.
/r/MensRights19/01/13 08:01 AM
1

I'm not sure myself. I think she's for real.
/r/MensRights19/01/13 07:00 AM
1

I tried arguing with her once, and that was enough. It doesn't get better.
/r/MensRights19/01/13 06:57 AM
1

Sow.
/r/MensRights19/01/13 06:10 AM
1

Most degrees don't give you "real" education, and you can get real education without a degree. I accept that there is a correlation, but it isn't causation.
/r/MensRights19/01/13 05:13 AM
2

The cynic in me also thinks at around the late 30's is when women begin realizing their looks are going downhill which gives them a blow to their confidence, or simply has them looking more so at personality traits in a compatible male. The cynic in you is right on the money.
/r/MensRights19/01/13 05:10 AM
1

I'm not so sure. I think that the reasons are usually financial, at the end of the day. It's been 40 years plus since women didn't get cash and prizes for checking out.
/r/MensRights19/01/13 05:07 AM
2

I think this subreddit has quite a few men who learnt that lesson the hard way.
/r/MensRights19/01/13 05:05 AM
1

Yes, I am :) Hook, line and sinker, dude.
/r/MensRights19/01/13 03:52 AM
2

People seemed to do fine getting married at 19 eighty years ago.
/r/MensRights18/01/13 03:36 AM
2

I noticed that she actually looked better at 42 than when she was with Matthew ... I thought she must be the only woman who never hits the Wall!
/r/MensRights18/01/13 03:33 AM
6

In my personal experience, your sentence could have been shorter: rarely do men leave
/r/MensRights18/01/13 03:26 AM
4

Matthew was a beta. That was the problem. Note that Richard, who cheated on her, was the one who had to dump her.
/r/MensRights18/01/13 03:21 AM
1

Since you seem so sure of yourself, I take it you're a lawyer?
/r/MensRights18/01/13 02:47 AM
2

Many ancient cultures did depict women as having a high sex drive - that isn't the trend now. I disagree. We are bombarded with pop culture telling us that women are just as sexually enthusiastic as men if not more so. Can you imagine what people in the 1970s (when sexual frankness in the media was already permitted) would have made of Sex and the City?
/r/MensRights18/01/13 02:45 AM
2

Men tend to pick by looks and be open to sex with many different women, and often quite early after meeting them. A lot of different factors (postponed marriage, drinking culture etc) play into the male sex drive.[...] Female sex drive and romantic/sexual desires often manifest themselves differently (status, long-term, etc). I.e., female sex-drive is manifested in ways that don't seem to have a direct connection with sex? I'm not sure that really assists the argument that the sex drives are equ…
/r/MensRights18/01/13 02:41 AM
2

the average woman does indeed have a much lower sex drive and that any charade to the contrary is exposed once a woman gets the security of a marriage. That reflects the experience of most of the many married men I know. I cohabited with a nympho for years, and even she would be the first to admit that men generally have a higher sex-drive.
/r/MensRights18/01/13 02:37 AM
1

I'll watch the video when I have time, but I'm aware of the subject-matter. Yes, I do agree with him.
/r/MensRights18/01/13 02:33 AM
2

Based on what they think of themselves? Sure. No, based of frequency of sexual acts (e.g., masturbation), for example. The lowest frequencies of sex, by far, were in Lesbians; the highest in male homosexuals. Testosterone is the key to sex drive. If your blood testosterone were to drop 30% below the normal male reference range (which is ten or twenty times the normal female reference range), your sex drive as you know it would virtually disappear. (I know: I have an androgen deficiency, and this…
/r/MensRights18/01/13 02:30 AM
7

They don't have a lower sex drive. Every relevant figure in Kinsey suggests that they do.
/r/MensRights17/01/13 05:36 PM
1

I think we are hamstrung by your difficulty with the terminology. I doubt whether it will let us go much further. Marriage is not regarded in law as a contract. Nuptial agreements are subject to family law regulations, not ordinary contractual principles.
/r/MensRights17/01/13 03:54 PM
7

Not just gender roles, the sexual and marriage marketplaces.
/r/MensRights17/01/13 03:41 PM
2

I think so. Women can do this because they control the sexual marketplace. Women control the sexual marketplace because of their lower sex-drive. If men had a correspondingly lower sex drive instead, one would expect men to control the sexual marketplace and thus be able to marry as a commercial enterprise.
/r/MensRights17/01/13 03:40 PM
5

Lynne Featherstone, the Liberal Democrat equalities minister, said [...] that firms would be able to use “positive action” to recruit new staff from under-represented groups for the first time. I wonder what an inequalities minister could come up with.
/r/MensRights17/01/13 03:36 PM
-1

I don't think that's got anything to do with my dictionary-collecting habit. If you want to have a genuine discussion about taxonomy, cut out the ad hominems.
/r/MensRights17/01/13 03:28 PM
1

Danke. In Australien hat das Wort eine ganz andere Bedeutung.
/r/MensRights17/01/13 03:25 PM
1

What is Abo short for?
/r/MensRights17/01/13 06:38 AM
1

Perhaps an /s tag?
/r/MensRights17/01/13 06:31 AM
0

How exactly?
/r/MensRights17/01/13 06:29 AM
1

Go to a court. Watch a rape trial. Note the respective SMVs of the complainant and the accused. Report back.
/r/MensRights17/01/13 06:28 AM
1

That's kind of a mean comment about his age (he's physically sprightly and intellectually able), but it's a great article. In my view, the Jewish influence on the medical profession, particularly in the prestigious area of medical pedagogy, is the main reason circumcision hasn't fallen out of favour more rapidly.
/r/MensRights17/01/13 05:43 AM
3

Of course it isn't. HR is typically the most misandrist department in any workplace. It's also usually run by air-headed women of easy virtue.
/r/MensRights17/01/13 05:27 AM
-2

Actually, I love them. I've got quite a collection. I like the Shorter Oxford (C.T. Onions' edition) best. I don't think you'd like it tho ...
/r/MensRights17/01/13 05:20 AM
2

If it makes you feel any better, feminists treat females who don't subscribe to there victim mentality a lot worse than males... But still better than males who call them out on their bullshit.
/r/MensRights16/01/13 06:57 AM
-15

I choose how I identify others.
/r/MensRights16/01/13 06:18 AM
2

Sounds like some people don't like meritocracy.
/r/MensRights16/01/13 02:14 AM
-1

You're right about this. It's just crazy. What does it even mean to feel like you're a member of the opposite sex anyway? I just feel like a person, and I think others are the same. Living as a member of the opposite sex, with or without surgery, is a choice. That makes it a fundamentally different characteristic from sex and race, for example. Also, why do MTFs outnumber FTMs by 4 to 1?
/r/MensRights16/01/13 01:14 AM
-15

I don't like self-appointed thought-police telling me what language to use.
/r/MensRights16/01/13 01:09 AM
4

Uh ... congratulations? :/
/r/MensRights16/01/13 12:42 AM
0

Fembook.
/r/MensRights16/01/13 12:39 AM
1

Really? The fact that the only women shown in the film are screaming fans doesn't lend any credence to my statement? There are 50,000 men running drills in Nuremberg, but apparently the only women there are acting in an observer's role. It was a military parade. I don't think there are any women in Lawrence of Arabia. Do you say that it promotes these Lebensborn ideas you're concerned about?
/r/MensRights16/01/13 12:26 AM
1

Something is generally admissible unless it is illegally obtained.
/r/MensRights16/01/13 12:24 AM
1

One good turn deserves another.
/r/MensRights16/01/13 12:22 AM
1

Refinancing is where she takes umbrage at the agreement and "trades up" instead. I believe it's quite popular nowadays.
/r/MensRights16/01/13 12:19 AM
1

It's one of my favourite films. It's a documentary concerning a public rally. I really can't think of anything in the film that lends credence to your statement. Leni Riefenstahl was a woman directing films in Germany in the 1930s, after all - hardly a stereotypically female role. Germany in general (and Hitler in particular) encouraged talented young women like her and the test pilot Hanna Reitsch to succeed in traditionally male roles. Just for your curiosity, I have had occasion to speak to L…
/r/MensRights15/01/13 02:19 PM
1

Then I guess that makes them unrepresentative.
/r/MensRights15/01/13 12:06 PM
3

That might be confirmation bias. Could be, but at least this opposition is being led by a woman: "One angry local threatened to paint over the model's manhoods herself."
/r/MensRights15/01/13 12:04 PM
3

"I want a guy who expresses his feelings" - "I want a guy who expresses my feelings". So true.
/r/MensRights15/01/13 04:41 AM
1

This is what human beings want out of a relationship, surely. I think ~50% of them only want money and an emotional "support" to shield them from reality.
/r/MensRights15/01/13 04:39 AM
6

I can understand, to a limited degree, heterosexual men being put off by these soccer players' generous tackle, given that we live in a culture that hates the male body and celebrates the female. What I find harder to understand is why those seeking to suppress images like these are usually women.
/r/MensRights15/01/13 04:32 AM
1

You can get compensation for that.
/r/MensRights15/01/13 03:36 AM
2

TIL 2/3 Austrian men are circumcised (not ... more like 1%) ... either that or their football teams are reliant on Muslim immigrants from North Africa.
/r/MensRights15/01/13 03:34 AM
5

And still buy the magazines, apparently.
/r/MensRights15/01/13 03:29 AM
0

LOL.
/r/MensRights15/01/13 03:28 AM
0

Please don't tell us what to up- and downvote. Downvoted.
/r/MensRights15/01/13 03:27 AM
1

Well, I woud never restrict my children's reading material, but this is certainly very misguided and should not be relied on. Come to think of it, no women's/girl's/men's/boy's magazines should be relied on. The Spectator or The Economist, sure.
/r/MensRights15/01/13 03:26 AM
1

This is keeping things at an ambiguous level by deliberately not defining boundaries so that the girl doesn't get embarrassed on Facebook. FTFY.
/r/MensRights15/01/13 03:22 AM
2

both of my female friends were intelligent enough to ask me if I was interested in being friends with them or if I was going to ask them out, right from the get-go. What great people. I wish I knew more (any) women like them.
/r/MensRights15/01/13 03:20 AM
1

"Sneaky ways to keep things casual"?
/r/MensRights15/01/13 03:16 AM
1

The article doesn't advocate just being friends if you don't want to be in a relationship, it explicitly states "sneaky ways to keep things casual." This cultivation of ambiguity shows a lack of integrity.
/r/MensRights15/01/13 03:15 AM
3

It seems that way.
/r/MensRights15/01/13 03:01 AM
2

In family law, the judge gets to make it up as he goes along.
/r/MensRights15/01/13 02:53 AM
1

Hush, don't tell anyone.
/r/MensRights15/01/13 02:52 AM
1

A hit man costs less than $5000, believe it or not. Anyone who wants more is probably an undercover cop.
/r/MensRights15/01/13 02:47 AM
1

You could lose more than half. Make the same mistake more than once, and you could lose a lot more.
/r/MensRights15/01/13 02:41 AM
1

You mean the Sharia law which guaranteed women the right to divorce and alimony centuries before Anglo-American law did?
/r/MensRights15/01/13 02:35 AM
1

A contract entered under duress is invalid. That is all this ruling is saying. Wrong. This case was not decided on contractual principles.
/r/MensRights15/01/13 02:34 AM
3

Maybe he just wanted to be straight up with his wife. Your "duress" has evaporated.
/r/MensRights15/01/13 02:26 AM
1

You're right, it doesn't make any difference to her capacity to exercise free will.
/r/MensRights15/01/13 02:24 AM
2

Refinance if you don't like the new contract? In many countries banks unilaterally vary the interest rate on their mortgage-secured loans all the time. This is no different.
/r/MensRights15/01/13 02:23 AM
1

One wants money for sex... the other wants money for sex and... staying at home? Almost died laughing.
/r/MensRights15/01/13 02:20 AM
5

Edit: And OBVIOUSLY the judge was a woman. It wouldn't have made any difference. TBH, you would probably get a fairer hearing from a female judge - who has probably been appointed solely because of her sex - than from a male judge, who has probably been appointed because he is a mangina.
/r/MensRights15/01/13 02:18 AM
18

The PTSD would have counted in his favour if he was a woman.
/r/MensRights15/01/13 02:11 AM
3

What's anti-feminist about Triumph of the Will?
/r/MensRights15/01/13 02:10 AM
1

Let's just say I have yet to see a single person say: "You don't know what the fuck you are talking about because you're a nigger". A point well made.
/r/MensRights15/01/13 02:06 AM
1

How do you identify them?
/r/MensRights15/01/13 01:24 AM
4

We have a public image problem for feminists. The problem is that we have a public image.
/r/MensRights14/01/13 04:29 AM
6

And their silence is reprehensible.
/r/MensRights14/01/13 04:16 AM
-8

Because moderate MRAs are naive and have a lot to learn.
/r/MensRights14/01/13 04:02 AM
8

And to think that people here knock the Daily Mail.
/r/MensRights13/01/13 05:57 PM
2

"Hanoi Jane" Fonda (pictured sitting on VC anti-aircraft vehicle).
/r/MensRights12/01/13 11:17 AM
2

Let me introduce my girlfriend ...
/r/MensRights12/01/13 11:13 AM
1

Good point, which nobody else seems to have noticed.
/r/MensRights12/01/13 11:04 AM
5

Would you care to tell us more about the argument?
/r/MensRights12/01/13 10:57 AM
1

In fairness to your girlfriend, the situation does sound far-fetched by what are considered typical social standards - it sounds like a lie invented to conceal infidelity. I must admit that if my girlfriend/boyfriend related such an incident to me, I would wonder whether it were a pre-emptive strike to cover up about-to-be-discovered cheating. OTOH, I'd certainly want to be told. *sp
/r/MensRights12/01/13 10:49 AM
1

those people are just inhumans as well. FTFY.
/r/MensRights12/01/13 10:44 AM
6

I think it was a joke.
/r/MensRights11/01/13 03:51 AM
4

His boyfriend didn't ask him to delete anything ...
/r/MensRights11/01/13 03:51 AM
2

Is nothing sacred? LOL.
/r/MensRights11/01/13 03:50 AM
0

Epiphany.
/r/MensRights11/01/13 02:43 AM
2

befriend a thief
/r/MensRights11/01/13 02:38 AM
2

Dial A For Adultery.
/r/MensRights10/01/13 11:47 AM
2

Some people seem to have trouble getting this one.
/r/MensRights10/01/13 09:29 AM
1

It's appalling. Anyone who has been acquainted with many Indians of both sexes should find the sex-stereotypes perpetuated by this campaign both hypocritical and laughable. This is a country that has a decades-old history of feminist organisations demonising men. The Indian statute books are replete with advantages accorded to the female sex over the male. *Given what has emerged about the apparent social status of the complainant and the accused, I think that this story may have been done befor…
/r/MensRights10/01/13 09:28 AM
1

She's a Canadian. I knew she couldn't be perfect ;)
/r/MensRights10/01/13 03:00 AM
1

Churchill FYI: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MkTw3_PmKtc MLK's was mostly an appeal to emotion [...] but he wasn't exactly citing a bunch of statistics. I think MLK's speech was more than that, and GWW didn't exactly cite statistics.
/r/MensRights10/01/13 02:59 AM
0

I'm just saying that attempts/completions ratios are probably roughly the same for both sexes and cultural pushes on men enforce silence about this On what data is your assertion based? Or is it based on your own analysis of male and female psychology, as mine is? No need to say something like that. I think it's true. That's all I need to say something.
/r/MensRights09/01/13 05:57 AM
3

Australia.
/r/MensRights09/01/13 04:22 AM
3

Lucky you. There's nothing like a pearl necklace.
/r/MensRights09/01/13 04:21 AM
1

I'd noticed this, but I thought I was all alone.
/r/MensRights09/01/13 04:20 AM
1

Martin Luther King's "I have a dream" speech wasn't too long. Neither was Winston Churchill's "Fight them on the beaches."
/r/MensRights09/01/13 04:13 AM
0

I think feminists actually know they are wrong.
/r/MensRights09/01/13 03:56 AM
1

Once is quite enough, mate.
/r/MensRights09/01/13 03:55 AM
1

She said she'd kill him.
/r/MensRights09/01/13 03:54 AM
2

O_o
/r/MensRights09/01/13 03:53 AM
1

/s
/r/MensRights09/01/13 03:51 AM
1

Jesus.
/r/MensRights09/01/13 03:47 AM
1

What a surprise.
/r/MensRights09/01/13 03:38 AM
2

They've been going strong since at least 1983, when s. 498A was introduced. I'm old enough to remember a lot of feminist lobbying in India in the '80s.
/r/MensRights09/01/13 03:37 AM
6

This woman, of all people, is in no position to criticise others for being "confrontational". *sp
/r/MensRights09/01/13 02:22 AM
14

This author seems outraged by the very notion that men should be able to advocate for any political change not designed to benefit women.
/r/MensRights09/01/13 02:11 AM
2

Nobody has suggested that violence is irrelevant. It's just a verbal.
/r/MensRights09/01/13 02:05 AM
4

A good question to which I don't know the answer.
/r/MensRights09/01/13 01:44 AM
-19

Suicidal men actually want to die. Women just self-harm and pretend it's attempted suicide to fuel their victim complexes.
/r/MensRights09/01/13 01:36 AM
2

LOL @ Paris.
/r/MensRights08/01/13 12:04 PM
1

Not me.
/r/MensRights08/01/13 04:59 AM
0

Go back to r/TwoX and/or r/SRS.
/r/MensRights08/01/13 04:56 AM
3

The world is swallowing this nonsense about rape in India hook, line and sinker. The truth is that India has some of the world's most active, vocal and shrill feminist organisations, who have together institutionalised legal discrimination against men in India (e.g., s. 498A of the Indian Penal Code). The protests are out of hand.
/r/MensRights07/01/13 03:03 PM
3

It troubles me that I find the bodybuilding.com forums to be one of the most enlightened places on the internet after reddit, even when the subject matter has nothing to do with bodybuilding.
/r/MensRights07/01/13 09:39 AM
1

The insurance companies are doing everything in their power to get as precise an image of the individual customer as they can. They profit more that way. They're also doing everything in their power not to offend the public by having different premiums based on things like race, sexuality, disability etc.
/r/MensRights07/01/13 03:31 AM
1

Maybe at all.
/r/TheRedPill06/01/13 03:33 PM
1

Follow the link on the page to the original study. I agree that correlation is not causation. Do you have any alternative hypotheses to the causation postulated here?
/r/MensRights06/01/13 03:00 PM
2

Anyone in criminal trial defence can tell you that you can run the defence of a woman accused of hurting a man like a plea in mitigation of sentence ("Look how badly she says he beat her!") and yet you will probably win. The consequence in jury trials of this bias toward women (and inherently therefore against men) is one aspect of the jury-nullification concept which we should all find disturbing.
/r/MensRights05/01/13 02:01 PM
1

Filshie clips apparently aren't used but there are occlusive techniques: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vasectomy#Vas_occlusion_techniques
/r/MensRights05/01/13 09:49 AM
1

I think it's prohibited by a nurse's professional association's regulations. As a libertarian, however, I am inclined to agree with you that such a prohibition is unjustifiable.
/r/MensRights05/01/13 09:44 AM
1

Kudos.
/r/MensRights05/01/13 06:51 AM
1

You didn't explain anything.
/r/MensRights05/01/13 06:33 AM
1

What about a university library or a symphony concert?
/r/MensRights05/01/13 04:41 AM
1

OK, airheaded then.
/r/MensRights05/01/13 04:39 AM
7

Guys go to college to get a job. Girls go to college for fun/"fulfilment".
/r/MensRights05/01/13 03:44 AM
2

Of course the principal was lying.
/r/MensRights05/01/13 03:42 AM
6

Your "angry little man" comment was gratuitous. How would you like to be called an "angry fat girl" or something similar?
/r/MensRights05/01/13 03:41 AM
2

What's the problem?
/r/MensRights05/01/13 03:40 AM
3

So they hate prostitution, but prostitutes are special snowflakes too.
/r/MensRights03/01/13 11:03 AM
8

There should be an "activate adblock" or "deactivate adblock" warning in the sidebar depending on whether the admins are currently treating us fairly.
/r/MensRights03/01/13 02:50 AM
1

We have more subscribers than they, according to the respective sidebars.
/r/MensRights03/01/13 02:46 AM
2

So much insight in this subreddit, MR-related or not.
/r/MensRights03/01/13 02:20 AM
1

"Forcing people" to keep their promises by refusing them a piece of paper abrogating those promises is not violence. Being married doesn't force any couple to stay together. (My parents are married but haven't seen each other in ten years.) However, I don't expect you (of all people) to understand this relative nuance.
/r/MensRights03/01/13 02:13 AM
1

the use of:Feminist dykes and Jessica Valenti lesbian bullshit (for a link that goes to a picture of gay men) pretty much justifies my "oh yeah, misogyny" impression. Those comments might reasonably give rise to an "oh yeah, homophobia" impression, but I'm not sure why you think attacking feminism or using epithets for gay women is misogynistic.
/r/MensRights03/01/13 02:10 AM
1

You sound very angry about something.
/r/MensRights03/01/13 02:04 AM
1

No-fault divorce is a good reform if you don't believe in the central tenets of marriage. (All that till-death-us-do-part stuff.) If you do, it sucks. No-fault divorce benefits the hypergamous and hands control of the entire relationship to the less committed partner.
/r/MensRights03/01/13 02:03 AM
0

Female orgasm is not essential for reproduction. Bad luck.
/r/MensRights02/01/13 03:12 AM
1

Boys have been fucking melons and banana skins since the beginning of time (almost). Read Portnoy's Complaint.
/r/MensRights02/01/13 03:10 AM
1

No girl is :/
/r/MensRights02/01/13 03:06 AM
2

I certainly wouldn't be hiding mine, unless my sister was coming over.
/r/MensRights02/01/13 03:06 AM
2

They're right ...
/r/MensRights02/01/13 03:03 AM
2

Women are wonderful, but men are made of snakes and snails and puppy-dogs' tails.
/r/MensRights01/01/13 03:17 PM
1

Thanks for those links. Very interesting.
/r/TheRedPill31/12/12 05:55 AM
1

Also, Rotating Polyandry by the same author.
/r/TheRedPill30/12/12 03:22 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter