TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

r_u_srs_srsly Archive

View 0 posts and 26 comments by r_u_srs_srsly on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

Imagine this comment suggesting the exact same thing about university rape. Holy cow.
/r/MensRights10/04/21 05:54 PM
2

THAT is the problem. There is no room for my fully educated opinion differs from your fully educated opinion, and that's OK. They think the only reason our opinions differ is because we haven't been fixed yet.
/r/MensRights10/11/16 02:40 PM
3

Perhaps I'm the only one who thinks this'll be interesting when inevitably someone gets a verbal yes but is later challenged after regret sets in. It'll force a judge jury to decide if this boarders on contract law.
/r/MensRights07/05/16 10:34 PM
10

hope solo kept her career.
/r/MensRights01/05/16 03:03 PM
1

Now you're putting words in my mouth. Not only addicts will use this program.
/r/MensRights31/03/16 07:33 PM
0

You just said addicts don't make reasoned choices. If they did they would be recreational. What was the point of saying that if not to differentiate from an addict? A fair reading of the article is: Recreational female users are worried about coming forward because they don't want to lose their kids over their recreation. Then you lumped wealthy people with Nannys into neglect. What point are you making? Neglectful parents should lose their children? Under your definition of neglect? Or are we j…
/r/MensRights31/03/16 06:27 PM
0

Cool down Al Sharpton I'm not OP Recreational users could still exchange needles under this program. You'd lump them in with addicts, but then now you wouldn't. Interesting that recreational drug use is less neglectful than wealthy parents providing additional paid supervision.
/r/MensRights31/03/16 05:42 PM
-5

Sending your kid to sports camp for a few weeks is neglect? You sound like you'd be a helicopter parent which would fuck up your kids worse.
/r/MensRights31/03/16 03:32 PM
7

Does that break any laws? I get being blacklisted from that employment line but does this legitimately classify as a violation of a law currently on the books. I'd so, what law specifically? Edit: I understand that she plead guilty to unlawful surveillance but would that actually stand up in a trial?
/r/MensRights29/03/16 12:35 AM
1

FTA: "Palmer’s co-defendant Julia Shawnette Gorman, 44, received the same sentence for the same convictions." Not going to say the title is intentionally misleading, but the article pretty clearly says they were both involved and the kid died. It's pretty clear case law nearly everywhere that you don't need to land the death blow to be charged with the death.
/r/MensRights21/03/16 03:00 AM
13

I sincerely hope you never serve on a jury
/r/MensRights23/01/16 10:56 PM
1

There were at least a few images in the main thread. Her job seems to involve settling them down and positioning them. And she seems effective at it. This isn't some lady coming out of nowhere for an ass grab. She seems to be charged with moving the show along so we don't get 2 dudes barking at each there for 20 minutes. Yes, no lies, a woman touches a man on the chest or ass, in most cases, his aggression comes down. It's not a secret and it's well studied, including its use in therapy. Combine…
/r/MensRights14/12/15 09:51 PM
-1

That's ridiculous. Look at referees in female boxing, especially during the olympics when everyone doesn't speak the same language. OP is pulling out the SJW card and simply looking for unfounded reasons to be offended. Rather than claim public outrage, how about linking to a single instance where a man, acting in an official capacity was reprimanded for doing his job.
/r/MensRights14/12/15 02:51 PM
-3

Therapeutic touch is a well documented and understood. She seems to be employed and responsible for calming, separating, and handling these guys. On the face of it, shes extremely effective at her job. MR isn't the PC police and it would be a shame to feign outrage at something none of the involved parties bat and eye at. Good or bad: men and women respond to touch differently. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1046/j.1365-2648.1999.01156.x/abstract;jsessionid=D641067A9B5057C1E55C33CA202F0B2…
/r/MensRights14/12/15 05:21 AM
3

They can say what they want as long as people treat sex like a sellers market. Change that market and the whole argument goes away.
/r/MensRights08/11/15 03:17 PM
10

You put that dude in jail, he's going to be bottom within a day. Judges won't admit to knowing that, but they do. Sit at home and can't use the Internet. Different level of punishment all together.
/r/MensRights20/09/15 03:21 PM
-5

Everyone not proficient with specific technology is a dumbass
/r/MensRights09/08/15 04:12 PM
2

This. There is no case law finding documented room mates to share long term responsibility. Simple as this. Don't deviate from the lease. If it says they owe 300/month. Collect. Even if you take them to dinner every night. If you're shown not to enforce the lease, it can be thrown out. Then you're cohabitating
/r/MensRights28/06/15 06:24 PM
2

Family aside: allowing anyone access to your personal belongings without a written agreement like a lease is a terrible idea. If you trust someone well enough to cohabitation without a written lease, it makes some sense that the court assumes you can share long term responsibility. Also, courts have allowed simple leases. Type up a document that has your name, the street address of the property, a weekly, monthly, or whatever cost, and an end/renewal date. It would be significantly harder to los…
/r/MensRights28/06/15 06:19 PM
7

Not just males. Women play grab ass too. Same goes for men. Notice a cold sore on a broad's lip as she's about to go down but it doesn't register yet? You're spot on as this may as well criminalize any regretful actions.
/r/MensRights28/06/15 05:29 PM
17

It was her supporters that created the page, not herself. The sentiment is no less terrible
/r/MensRights29/04/15 02:29 AM
7

That's a bold claim to apply so broadly. I'd like to see a peer reviewed study concluding that. No one is well equipped, let alone better equipped based on sex. Plenty of men with PTSD support that.
/r/MensRights06/04/15 01:43 AM
2

Unless the question was "would you commit a crime if there were no concequences?" Then later said rape is a crime. Then you're included
/r/MensRights15/01/15 02:42 AM
3

Interestingly, this commonplace incident gains attention only after union employees get targeted. If you remember, officer safety was the reason for cameras, not public safety. Also interestingly, this will be two groups who use the one bad apple argument a little too often. Neither will realize that though.
/r/MensRights18/10/14 11:47 PM
8

From the article. The judge said his wife played a "much lesser role" in the operation, while the court heard she "would not have been involved" but for her husband
/r/MensRights03/10/14 01:17 PM
12

The article itself has the answer. No one cared* about domestic abuse until sponsors started pulling out. Radisson pulled out from the vikings before they took him out. Order of importance is: Money> winning> personnel> off field drama. Being outraged about the drama is AT BEST the 4th most important thing To effect change, you need to hit the money. Don't tweet to each other. Tweet the sponsors. http://www.ussoccer.com/about/sponsors
/r/MensRights19/09/14 04:22 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter