TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

rackmerackyou Archive

View 3 posts and 72 comments by rackmerackyou on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
9

The problem is that it's just circlejerk bait -- the TRPers just upvote it anyway and jerk each other to it. Sometimes you have to know when people are simply not capable or willing to have certain kinds of discussions. I'd say banning him benefits the more sane RPers, too.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/15 12:06 AM
2

My answers: 1) Women are attracted to masculinity -- Yes and no. I'm a pretty fit guy, 5'11 @ 170 mostly muscle, played football for 10 years, decided to stop in college, wrestled @ 220+ because I could. So I guess body-wise I'd be "masculine", but I'm also bi and I look like it -- I wear the same glasses as a "gay" man, I wear tight baby blue pants, all my socks are weird/bright colors, etc. Other people ask my friends if I am gay literally all the time. The thing is, when I "came out" as bi a …
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/15 04:59 PM
1

Careful, you might cut yourself with all that edge.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/15 09:46 PM
0

I think this is one of those things that RPers will never let go. any men and women here have rape fantasies? What do they mean to you ? My partner and I have non-con fantasies of varying degrees, but not strictly rape fantasies. We've talked about them and acted them out and role-played as well. I myself have been sexually assaulted (people have tried to rape me, I have been able to stop them). My partner has their own baggage. We manage things just fine. The thing that RPers willfully misunder…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/15 12:30 AM
2

I definitely get what you are saying about social media activism in the US. In places like Egypt, it's been used as a tool to enact real change, but its role is definitely much more insidious here in the West. Egypt, in contrast to the US, has a very large divide between the conservative+religious older generations and the more "western" educated younger generation, so there's already a ton of friction just on a social level. Kinda reminds me of Starbucks' "Race Together" thing. If you haven't l…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/15 07:28 PM
2

I was kinda done with replies, but this one I can't resist: it's telling that you compare OP's post to fiction. Because it's fiction. I hope this is obvious now.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/15 07:27 AM
11

Unfortunately, I did. I repeat: There's no way to give you a serious response because it's just -that- out of touch with reality. It can't be good to be this paranoid, dude.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/15 05:27 AM
16

Don't women know that men made marriage so we can help them? Who is going to keep them in check? Women need a captain to tell them what to do and marriage was our structure for that. When that collapses -- then what? Men only lose in this scenario. Without a structure to facilitate men controlling guiding women, men will look to science for a way to fulfill the need to dominate put their dick in love women. Women, directionless, will turn to feminism and turn us all into cuckolded betas. Honestl…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/15 04:45 AM
1

I read like 80% of the article, so take this with a grain of salt, I'm on mobile at work atm. The overly-PC/"SJW" crowd are certainly out there. However, as someone that did their undergrad at Berkeley (mentioned in the article), I can tell you that ther are a lot of people at the upper-level of academia that don't buy into this BS. The TLDR of why I think this happens is because a lot of academic and feminist jargon trickles its way down and more people start using it without actually understan…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/15 01:37 AM
9

I'm replying to a user, not TRP: It's always about when the woman is "ready to marry", isn't it? That's the fucking problem with women these days. I'm agreeing with his comments -- who are these women to think things? That's for men only. If you're wondering why I'm not responding to the strawman "women complain when men decide they don't want to get married/perform their agency", it's because it's a strawman. Edit: That's not what TRP is saying. It's saying women are absolutely free to decide w…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/15 12:48 AM
28

Yeah, who are women to decide what they want to do with their lives? What about me? What about the men??
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/15 11:12 PM
1

It's almost like people started replying to your comment without even reading what it's about. And then they performed it. x_x
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/15 05:09 AM
1

If you look at the Schrodinger's Rapist article Yeah, and I've already told you I looked at it before when it was linked on TRP I read it again when I read the OP. When TRP says a woman with a lot of previous partners is a red flag, we're misogynistic, and 'you shouldn't judge'. Watch out, dude, having sexual partners is, like, a red flag that she's sexually active, or something. Let's hope she doesn't like sex or we are in trouble. I'm familiar with the outlandish claims TRPers make about any w…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/15 08:10 PM
2

Eh, I feel like this really doesn't address what I said in regards to AWALT. I even acknowedge the defense that it's "just a teaching tool" and if you actually look at how TRPers use AWALT you will find that this simply isn't the case. Schrodinger's Rapist This is a perfect example of what I mentioned -- how TRPers use made-up shit to create the illusion of being internally consistent. Hamsters gonna hamster, never-mind that whoever first penned the whole Schrodinger's Rapist thing clearly doesn…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/15 04:27 AM
1

Well then, you're just wrong Ah, you have defeated me! EDIT: I was gonna leave it at that, but I'll help you out a bit. The physiological differences between men and women aren't constructed; they are easily biologically and behaviorally observed. 'Male sexual nature' describes these differences. So, when TRPers talk about "male sexual nature", they are usually talking about male sexuality in a way reminiscent of all that "Natural State of Man" shit from Rousseau, Hobbes, & co. This kind of stuf…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/15 04:28 PM
2

I'll be honest. MGTOW's image is that of bitter men who -- for one reason or another -- decide to become hermits because women are talking over the world and are the cause of all their problems. I'm sure not all of them are like this, but that is what I think of when someone mentions them. To answer your question: I don't think of them. Their numbers are pretty significant and it would be extremely unlikely that I'd run into one because of that.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/15 07:23 AM
4

You really think the amount of T in a man's body, his propensity to easily become sexually aroused and have an orgasm, and the anatomical design and shape of a dick, which maximize sexual pleasure are all just results of socialization? No, yes, yes and no (circumcision), yes If anything, I think your denial of very obvious male sexual nature is a result of socialization I think "male sexual nature" is a concept constructed in language especially since you are offended by the phrase "procure puss…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/15 05:36 AM
3

I wrote it one night while drunk. I write a lot -- one specific night, PPD happened to be the subject.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/15 03:57 AM
4

Proof women really have a hard time conceptualizing male sexuality. I have a penis. You also seem to have problems understanding that a guy who's not getting any ass will be seriously inconvenienced in his life--more than a woman who's not getting sex. I find a few things odd with statement, but I'll just say that the main point of departure between you and I (and TRP and myself) is that I assume you think that sex is inherently more important to men than it is to women. So I disagree with what …
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/15 03:56 AM
1

I appreciate the effort here, but wow this is too long. yeah, it's kind of habit, I'll try to make others shorter if I end up doing them still First, and you almost acknowledge this with the AA comparison, is it's totally non-unique to TRP. i don't think it's unique to trp, that also wasn't my point. in fact, i think there's not that much stuff that actually is unique to trp Second, you've built an inappropriate relationship between science and truth, while simultaneously using authors like Plat…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/15 03:44 AM
8

uh my best attempt would be to say that TRPers replace critical thinking with TRP-thought in the form of language that doesn't have meaning I look at how AA uses language and compare it
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/15 09:19 PM
0

There are short/inadequate summaries in italics at the beginning of each little section-thing. Sections are bolded.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/15 09:15 PM
2

Somehow I doubt you worked in academia though. i'm doing graduate research at nyu, but nice try :p you're not open-minded yeah because bi guys in sexually open relationships doing research at nyu are totally close-minded You have this image of science being this pristine, unbiased machine yeah cool did i say that? no? ok. this kinda just tells me you're more interested in talking to yourself, so i'll leave you to it, pce
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/15 11:21 PM
3

I used to work in academia, I'm not pulling this out of nowhere. Controversial issues are both dismissed outright without being intellectually considered Really? Where at? I really doubt this. Was it Berkeley? Stanford? Columbia? Were you a middle school teacher? I've actually never seen anyone dismissed outright because most academics (read: in the top 10 universities in the country) don't come up with things dumb enough that others would just outright dismiss. And, if anything, it's usually th…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/15 09:25 PM
2

The "real" problem with feminism - aside from its self-interest in ignorance of - where not at expense of - the 'other' - is that it wants the status it imagines men enjoy. This is, obviously, a trap. Can you tell me where you get this? Because I've never seen/heard this to be the case. If anything, feminism seeks to break down gendered binaries, even right down to their reformation in discourse/language (which is what reinforces gender norms). Think about this for a second -- there are many way…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/15 08:44 PM
0

Yeah, I mean she goes on to even make the argument that even divisions of sex are socially constructed, and I can see her point, but it does seem far fetched when you take it to the extreme. My own qualms aside, it's definitely a highly influential work (perhaps one of the most) in regards to gender and queer theory.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/15 02:09 AM
4

Judith Butler's Gender Trouble is (imo) by far the most important work on gender and sexuality in the recent past. Also, it's pretty much the polar opposite of TRP (and also of what TRP thinks is feminism). It's not exactly like the post you mentioned, but if anything should be required reading it should be Gender Trouble.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/15 09:07 PM
11

Does that fat kid playing World Of War Craft not like sex too? Why doesn't he just go out and sleep with the hot sorority girl. You just gave me the "ugly nerdy guy" stereotype and "hot ditzy girl" stereotype and asked me if I would pair them up. Of course I wouldn't, no one would. Aside from the obvious, their characters are different. They have literally nothing in common -- physically or otherwise. This has little to do with what I said. People like sex. People are attracted to what they find…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/15 08:47 PM
7

I agree that there are people that have sex (when they are younger) with people both inside and outside of their league. And I agree that (sometimes) eventually these people marry someone. Where I disagree is that I don't think women are hypergamous sloots trying to ride the cock carousel fucking alphas left and right and settling for a beta. The much simpler explanation is that people like sex. A shocker, I know. And eventually they find someone with which they can be partners -- not just sexua…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/15 07:07 PM
1

Honestly, TRP has a long way to go before it could ever be considered a place that would be generally accepted. There are definitely some no-brainer things there that everyone would agree with, like, "don't pedestal-ize sex/other people, you do you," etc, but the very premise of their whole "self-improvement" thing is to try to make oneself more desirable in the eyes of others. TRP tells you to take people off of the pedestal and then put them right back on there because other people are the met…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/15 08:38 AM
1

I'm confused as well, I thought he pretty clearly identified himself as a rapist here.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/15 11:08 PM
5

Happens all the time, I could even show you my last post I made here. I criticize the way OP views people (particularly non-RPers) in extremely binary or rigidly defined ways (common in TRP): [...] It's understandably TRP that pushes the dichotomies and divisions in these kinds of subs because the practice of identifying as a "pill" isn't something that people do outside of TRP and related subs. [...] To address the OP, I think that the black and white "weak BP" or "SJW" view of non-RPers is a p…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/15 10:06 PM
0

Dude, you're proving my point right now.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/15 04:38 AM
7

I was just thinking this as well. I won't claim to speak for anyone else, but the reason I use the blue label for my tag is because that's what TRPers would probably label me as. It's something that just makes it easier for other people to grasp a surface-level context for the comments I make. I wouldn't label myself as blue pill, but I also wouldn't label myself as a lot of other things that people would label me as. It's understandably TRP that pushes the dichotomies and divisions in these kin…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/15 03:49 AM
2

Your entire post is one big strawman. I never mentioned any of those things. The topic at hand is dread game. Don't try to change the subject. I asked for sources proving without a doubt that dread game is literally automatic for women. I agree that it would be a waste of resources because I don't think TRP is backed by science. Right now, the only reason RPers think all women dread is because AWALT, which is itself an unscientific approach to the world. If AWALT were true for my experiences, th…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/15 02:27 AM
2

Dread game for an averagely attractive woman is automatic Like seriously, I'm challenging RPers to back this up with actual scientific data. And this, from the OP: women do this all the time to their significant others you gotta prove that, too, buddy. I know that, you know that, everyone knows it no matter how we are treated for discussing it out loud. Has TRP adopted "feeeeelz over realz" now? I always hear RPers complaining on this sub about how TRP is "logical" and "scientific" while non-RPe…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/15 06:55 PM
1

When did I say it never happens?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/15 06:43 PM
1

I was asking for proof that women dread men more than men dread women. What you quoted was me explaining that my partner and I "pull Indicators of Interest from the opposite sex" in front of each other for reasons that have nothing to do with dread. Read more carefully.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/15 06:42 PM
-1

Well shit-- women do this all the time to their significant others Source? so why can't men? Eye for an eye, yada yada. You really think it's that common for women to "[send] flowers to [themselves] 'from an admirer'"? How many people on Earth actually do this? Some examples of this are creating dating profiles Like Tinder? Because my partner and I both have Tinder accounts. We go on Tinder together. going out without your partner to bars and clubs We both do this. Believe it or not, but you can…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/15 07:25 AM
7

If you think that women can learn to hide/suppress something like that -- something that was normalized for hundreds of thousands, possibly millions of years -- in one generation, what makes you think that attraction to DT traits isn't the same? That it doesn't change? Why are only some things fluid and others not? Women initially chose DTs for their utility, not attraction. And you're suggesting that changed over time and somehow got passed down through genes? If humans can change so easily, wh…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/15 09:55 AM
3

Wasn't it? I feel like Dark Triad traits would be immensely useful, even in the present day, to any nation-state or entity that has to engage in military defense (which is most of them). I would argue Dark Triad traits make one a far better warrior than those who are non-DT. If recent events have been any indication, rulers of states that are "DT" get ganged up on by other countries because no one wants them around. Much of transnational politics is about not pissing other people off. I said tat…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/15 09:24 AM
2

lol
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/15 08:43 AM
5

I don't really give much thought to anything labeled evolutionary psychology regardless of whether or not it confirms something I already think. It's not a very academic/scientific field, similar to things like Rousseau's Second Discourse where he extrapolates ideas from his own fictional accounts of early human civilization. That doesn't mean it can't be important in other ways, but I personally don't base any of my own thoughts about the world on evolutionary psychology. What do you think of t…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/15 08:37 AM
8

The way you completely dismantled everything I said was... incredible! I mean, let me try. Achem -You- have no idea what you are talking about.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/15 08:12 AM
9

The simple answer would be that DTs are in the minority. The very fact that they have to operate outside of the bounds of society ("anti-social, aggressive, violent," etc) is indicative that people generally and simply do not want to be around people with these traits. In the open they are shunned both socially and legally (hence why people like your cousin get thrown in jail, have a hard time finding work, etc). The very structure of society puts DTs in the minority. Having said that, society d…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/15 08:03 AM
2

What you said at the end was exactly my point -- that entitlement isn't necessarily bad. What we should be asking, then, is why people feel entitled to certain things at all. So, when it comes to sex or some men feeling entitled to a women's body, the more academic contemporary feminists would say that the feeling of entitlement is a product of socialization/society and interrogate that instead of attacking the product (the person) of those ideas that permeate the culture. But of course some peo…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/15 06:35 PM
2

I don't see how what I said has anything to do with slippery slopes. The first amendment is a slippery slope? What? There's already a ton of court rulings specifically outlining the extent to which speech is protected, so that hasn't slipped anywhere... I think we are misunderstanding each other. Care to elaborate?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/15 03:24 AM
2

If you're one of the special exceptions to AWALT, you're defective. Your wiring is wrong. What a second -- you're saying that women that are exceptions to AWALT are different because of inherent, biological wiring science truths? Because that was also the argument for why AWALT. Assuming this, there's two things that don't make sense: How do we know that the exceptions to AWALT are not, in fact, the intended design of women by nature? Surely, since all women are apparently terrible, hypergamous …
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/15 07:11 PM
3

See original post. Alright, let's first address how you set this up all wrong. What BluePills think it [entitlement] means You done goofed right at the beginning. It doesn't make sense to begin a debate with someone by telling that someone what they think. I know what I think because I'm thinking it -- so let me say it. This is like the strawman's estranged cousin or something. Your definition: The correct usage of the word “entitlement” in context of engendered discussion should be more correct…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/15 08:18 AM
6

Cool, I'm in a post! Hello there! If you look at my comment, I specifically said "some men feel entitled to sex". I don't see how you got "men are, in general entitled to sex". On mobile and at work atm (missing the Super Bowl :<), but I could give you more clarification later if you would like. Short version would be that I think you are completely misrepresenting what entitlement means as well as ignoring how dictionaries themselves are politically situated in structures of power. DFW has a re…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/15 10:23 PM
3

I thought that TRP was first and foremost about sexual strategy and I always see ECs saying that TRP is not interested in politics (even if it happens to have political consequences). Is this wrong?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/15 10:07 PM
4

What you're suggesting that the same, identical problems affect both genders in the same, identical ways. I don't think I said this, maybe I'm unclear. I think that common notions on gender and sexuality affect women and men differently -- although the notions themselves are pervasive. Regardless, I think society places different constraints on men and women and I'm pretty sure RPers and BPers would agree on this. I think that the disagreement is that BPers think it's a product of society while …
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/15 01:11 AM
3

No, I don't mean all men. I think it's true for a lot of men, maybe a majority, idk exactly. Thing is, they could easily learn, but are often more concerned with getting their own rather than helping their partner get off (because they think they already know what their partner wants). But if you are just hooking up with someone I understand why. When it comes down to it, people are responsible for their own orgasms imo. I don't get why some people whine about their partner not getting them off …
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/15 12:18 AM
7

A man who is known is satisfy women is highly desired, much like an effective vibrator. Lemme FTFY: A man that knows how to satisfy women is highly desired by them Why is this news? Also, sounds like the problem is that men don't know how to satisfy women or know how the female body works, not that women are necessarily harder to sexually stimulate. it is easier to please a man than for a man to please a woman I don't think you can prove that the problem is women are harder to get off instead of…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/15 08:25 AM
1

I think where RPers and BPers disconnect is that (imo) RPers fail to see that "alpha male" is a label that they ascribe to someone that appears (to them) to display the traits you mentioned (dominant, composed, courageous, etc). The idea of the alpha male in our society is a cultural thing. This applies to animals as well when talking about observing behavior. Science isn't something concrete or natural -- it's a culturally-constructed thing. For example, an animal that might be labeled as "alph…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/15 06:50 AM
1

I could totally see that. I feel like after reading TRP I often conflate guys going out of their way to appear "alpha" in social settings with TRP, though I know in reality they probably don't know what TRP is.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/15 10:40 PM
1

Last weekend at party with partner ("Anna"): Guy ("Tom") shows up late, everyone is already going strong, having good time, starts trying to get something going with girl no one really knows ("Mandy"). Tom tells people that he wants to be head of the safety department at GM (got a new job) because he is a natural born leader because he is 1) a man 2) he has experience leading women "if ya know what I mean" and also says that the current supervisors are "pussies". This doesn't set a good tone wit…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/15 07:44 PM
2

I think that differentiating between a TRP guy and a PUA can sometimes be difficult. In the case of the party I went to this weekend, conversation actually got political and some things that were said were almost TRP verbatim. I mean, if I had to grade th person in question on how well they did TRP-wise, I would say they did pretty well. I don't think the environment did him any favors, but he worked with it pretty well. I wouldn't say that he had any bad behavior, just that I disagree with some…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/15 04:22 AM
2

Yeah, I was thinking that would probably be the "correct" TRP thing to do. Though, in my experiences, guys sometimes blow it for themselves by trying to hard to assert some kind of dominance or "Alpha-ness" and the facade becomes easily visible. I usually just let them do their thing and they almost become a parody of themselves. Though, sometimes I've seen them leave to mingle with other people and they'll leave with someone else. I assume these are RP noobies or something? Or do you think that…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/15 04:10 AM
4

With beta orbiters, girls have multiple guys emotionally invested in them, with little to no physical reciprocation. reciprocation Assuming that you view relationships as transactions (not that I necessarily disagree), why should a woman reciprocate a "beta orbiters" emotions with sex? Furthermore, if a woman invests emotions into a "beta orbiter" (TRP calls this person an "emotional tampon"), and the guy invests emotions in her as well, why is she expected to have sex with him? Emotions for emo…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/15 05:00 AM
5

So are you capable of anything other than "sensationalizing" and calling people cutesy names in a debate sub? Do you think that's how debates are won? Is this the limit of RPer male-rationality? Honestly, every time I see you here in this sub you are saying something dumb and then comin back with "just kidding guys, gotcha!". Do you care to put forward something intelligent? If not why waste your time here? You're becoming really predictable (and it's getting old), dude. I mean this sincerely --…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/15 06:49 PM
4

Because there's no sources or evidence or anything to base OPs assumptions on. They are, by definition, baseless assumptions. Edit: here are his "sources" As we know So basically, let's assume So from that perspective, why should low SMV men fight alongside feminists? They shouldn't. You just gave us a bunch of unsubstantiated claims and told us to assume it were all true and then make a decision based on that. You might as well say, "assuming that all dogs go to heaven, tell me why dogs don't g…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/15 06:14 PM
4

Lol Is this the limit of RP critical-thinking abilities? I mean this question seriously. If so, I think I understand why RPers think they know people better than they know themselves -- RPers obviously have the ability to read people's minds and see into the future. That explains how they know who rapists are!
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/15 05:56 PM
6

I've noticed this too, and often times it seems to swing wildly between differing poles -- either looking only at black guys or non-black guys. From what I've seen, a lot of women get varying degrees of flak for dating outside their race -- and more if they are just hooking up. From what I've experienced (as a white male), I'm often met with skepticism when a partner that is black or non-white (including my current partner) introduces me to friends. There's definitely a sense that my masculinity…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/15 09:21 PM
2

When you include the word "every," an absolute, you're bound to encounter problems. It is extremely difficult in this kind of a context to prove that every member of TRP believes that the world is against them. Just don't question AWALT, guys. Pls don't
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/15 06:53 PM
2

RPers claims to victimhood are really baffling. It's like they've realized that American society has fucked certain peoples for a while and now that victims are becoming empowered by being given the opportunities to speak, RP wants that identity too -- for the power that comes with it. There was a funny little post a while ago that someone made on "cant" and TRP. The thing is, cant is a kind of language that only people who are marginalized or subaltern have access to. The formation of cant is a…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/15 06:48 PM
3

I see what you are saying. I think the part where you lost me is by calling it "evidence" -- not to say that it necessarily isn't, but evidence (as far as I know) must necessarily be valid. Data being valid is what constitutes evidence. Anyway, I was just wondering what happens when BPers or RPers submit things as "evidence" when the evidence in question is blatently not valid or just nonsensical. Do mods disregard it or is it included? I guess what I'm wondering is: if mods are running a thread…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/15 08:14 AM
2

Th big danger/problem that will probably arise is that everyone is going to argue over the validity and biases of studies, essays, etc. I imagine I that it would be quite difficult to find studies that everyone can agree on. Fo example: the findings of studies by serious academic bodies generally do not align with TRP beliefs. In addition, there is also a ton of disagreement on whether findings are indicative of cultural conditioning or some kind of "nature" that TRP talks about. Having said tha…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/15 04:37 AM
1

How do TRPers predict relationships? There are so many variables in the world that I think it's pretty damn impossible to predict how a relationship will end (if it does so). Sure, you can take 20 out of 1 billion variables and try to make a prediction out of those 20 variables you know of, but is it fair to say that the prediction is a sound one? Even if you had all of the variables, do you think you could still make a prediction when free-will/autonomy is injected into the equation? Here's an …
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/15 11:08 PM
14

So is there any advice BPers could give counter to that to someone who feels that uncertainty? Your whole premise in the OP is absurd -- you manipulate people because someone has the capacity to do something you don't like? That's why you see TBP respond to TRP with satire. In this case, I might tell you a story about why I live in a literal bubble whenever I leave my house because of the possibility of something happening. It's just like dread game and making sure something bad doesn't happen b…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/15 10:35 PM
4

Is this BP because the female brings home the bacon, or RP because the male is achieving sexual and mental stimulation? I think this is just one example of many that demonstrates that the black/white RP view of the world doesn't really hold up to scrutiny. The whole idea that generalizing to the point where there is no detail or room for nuance is fundamentally different from the way sciences attempt to understand the world. It shows that if you are able to so easily upset hypotheticals, somethi…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/15 08:25 PM
2

Many of us are non-hetero, do you think this has an impact on how TRP is viewed or argued against in general I think it does to a certain extent because RPers generally view sexuality in binary (and patently archaic) terms. I think that when one is confronted with their own sexuality and that sexuality is nonbinary, it also forces that person to either break out of the rigid view of sexuality that RPers (and many nonRPers in the world) hold or to deny one's own sexuality. On the whole, though, I…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/15 08:10 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter