TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

raducu123 Archive

View 0 posts and 67 comments by raducu123 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
0

All true, except the revenge line, that was pretty low, that is where OP should feel ashamed of himself, if his story is true.
/r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre19/07/21 05:13 AM
1

I'd say what a piece of shit, but at least he was honest in the end. I have this human desire that we're not just subject to arbitrary chance, so please tell me, in hindsight, did you notice any red flags about him?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/21 03:05 PM
1

Men pull out all the stops for NEW women, hot women, young women, old women, skinny women, fat women and women in general :)
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/21 03:01 PM
7

In my experience, women's sex drive is different than mens. Men have higher base sex drive while women can have "hibernating" sex drives -- average young guy not having sex/masturbating for a week, he's going to think about it non-stop, while a similarly young and healthy woman will have no problem. Men would be orders of magnitude more likely to do silly/shameful things to get sex, while women much less likely to do the same. BUT when the right guy appears, women get out of their "hibernation" …
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/21 02:57 PM
4

It's funny because in my experience people who say "I'm not like that" are exactly like that. Besides, what's wrong with "Hey sexy" in itself, unless she really is not that sexy?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/21 02:49 PM
3

Please tell me you didn't use the "hey, does this napkin smell like cloroform" trick.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/21 02:47 PM
2

People do shit test and they do date. Shit testing in dating is such an easy issue to deal with, and dealing with shit tests is such a small issue to solve, but someone that learns it is lead to a false sense of security, they usually have much bigger issues than just dealing with shit tests -- boundaries, healthy relationships and social skills in general.
/r/ExRedPill09/06/21 06:57 AM
1

'Shit testing' in adults is real, in both men and women, it's men that do it that are the most annoying/toxic, because with women you can just 'next' them, with men it's usually in settings you can't just 'next' them. 'Shit testing' as presented by RP is psychological games level 1/10, they present it as a great achievement if you learn to deal with it in their ways, but it's like first grade child thinking they need no more school because they learnt to write cursive.
/r/ExRedPill09/06/21 06:50 AM
-2

Rich and famous men don't need to be pretty, not because men are ugly, but because they cracked the dating game. Men don't care about women being rich&famous, that's why those women have to keep putting in the effort.
/r/ExRedPill08/06/21 09:04 PM
-2

The ugly gender, lol, you can go back to your fds cave now.
/r/ExRedPill08/06/21 08:50 PM
1

Did you read what I wrote? Rich men get to satisfy whatever fetish they have, average height, average job Joe gets a wife 2-3 years younger in his 30s if he plays his hand right, it's a big imptovement over his dating life in his 20s. Dating gets easier for a man in his 30's, he won't have the harem RedPill tells him.
/r/ExRedPill08/06/21 07:25 PM
-1

Sure it's not much now, when you realize the implication of your own words are rich&famous men don't need looks as much as rich&famous women, but it was when you first made that statement :)
/r/ExRedPill08/06/21 07:07 PM
1

It might be so in your bubble. But in general both men and women are just as bad at taking care of themselves (body fat statistics). The difference is superficial -- makeup, clothing ... and just about it.
/r/ExRedPill08/06/21 07:02 PM
1

The men didn't look great in the Friends special. The women looked amazing It kind of makes you wonder why rich men don't care as much as rich women about their looks :)
/r/ExRedPill08/06/21 06:58 PM
2

The bigger the difference, the more the man earns, probably. But even if he's just "showing up", the man can easily expect to marry someone 2-3 years younger than him, I mean, 7X% percent of men marry a younger woman in general.
/r/ExRedPill08/06/21 06:53 PM
0

It's not completely delusional, but it's not exactly accurate -- you make it seem the man needs to be rich to marry a younger woman, which is not true, he just needs to have his life in order. If the man is single in his 20's but average all around (looks, height, income and all that), he's going to have much better luck in his 30s when a lot of women settle down and have more "mature" criteria, provided he takes care of himself -- when a lot of the hot losers weed themselves out of the dating m…
/r/ExRedPill08/06/21 06:28 PM
2

It says nothing of the meat pay gap, so I see not reason to get triggered, but whatever.
/r/ExRedPill08/06/21 04:26 PM
1

What was the myth that it was smashing? That in homo sapiens males do the hunting? Or that there was a "patriarchy" in the paleolithic?
/r/ExRedPill08/06/21 04:07 PM
10

Fat women can start dating fat men. I know exactly one such case, they are both fat and verry happy. I only know her, but she was an awesome coleague. Zero bad vibes, zero feelings of "I've got to watch out around this loose and unhinged gun" I usually get around fat single women.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen05/06/21 01:42 PM
-2

Also they're pervs. The 50's called, they want their stereotype back.
/r/ExRedPill04/06/21 07:25 AM
2

A man in his thirties won't date an 18 year old woman, more like late 20's and there's nothing wrong with that. Those cases with 30 year olds dating 18 year olds, usually involve financial support, but I'm sure it's exeedingly rare, regardless of male fantasy :) Bitter people like to delude themsevles with revenge fantasy -- RP men that they can get the young pretty women later in life(which they couldn't while younger), FDS women that they can get "higher value men"(again, which they couldn't w…
/r/ExRedPill04/06/21 07:22 AM
-2

If you're a man, 35 and just don't want a family yet, younger women are oftentimes a better match, no bullshit attached. Most of the smart women in their 30s, emotional baggage or not(which applies to both men and women) want a family, and usually they want it in the near future.
/r/ExRedPill04/06/21 07:18 AM
1

Is there anywhere he talks about "enforcing monogamy"? I heard him saying single men are a "problem" for society, but nothing about "enforcing monogamy", to me it looked like someone saying "hey, we'll soon have a problem with single young men" -- like raising an allarm.
/r/ExRedPill02/06/21 12:55 PM
2

You don't want to listen to my logical and valid points. You want to twist things to fit your bullshit narrative. RP likes to think it's so logical and unemotional but this kind of blind 'woe is me' and 'women are sooooo mean to men' whining proves the opposite. It's very immature. All I saw in your comments were just justifications and "defending" women because initiating divorce has a bad vibe to it and somehow making it men's "fault". There's nothing to blame and nothing to defend. You can't …
/r/ExRedPill02/06/21 12:35 PM
0

Sorry but that's just a handwave at the fact. So basically the only reason why we don't see women initiating divorces across the board being in the 90% is because they stay for the money. But I like how we changed the tune from "abusive relationships" to "thriving relationships", it seems now we're getting somewhere.... like "I'm kind of bored and I get all the benefits from divorce, so why not?". Kind of like the behavior of greek gods, celebrities, people with money, but with the "I'm a victim…
/r/ExRedPill02/06/21 12:00 PM
2

Most men can't tell cup size either :) Everything on the internets is blown out of proportion, how can we have proper fights otherwise?
/r/ExRedPill02/06/21 11:49 AM
0

So when those ~90% of higher educated women who innitiate divorce, they do it because they are in abusive marriages? Surely not. Divorce is a complicated issue and by providing anectodes and defaulting to blaming men, we're just feeding TRP/incel/mgtow.
/r/ExRedPill02/06/21 08:59 AM
0

I'm a man and also don't have sex with any men.
/r/ExRedPill02/06/21 08:41 AM
0

Is there any need to keep a handbook of statistics for well known figures? Like divorce rates, birth rates, the fact that water is wet and all that? I'm not talking about the bullshit 80-20 rule*
/r/ExRedPill02/06/21 08:33 AM
0

Except young men much more than young women, twice more young men not having sex compared to women afik.
/r/ExRedPill02/06/21 08:28 AM
2

In monogamy not all women are entitled or can mathematically get the commitment of men over 6feet tall, just like not all people can buy expensive cars.
/r/ExRedPill02/06/21 08:24 AM
0

Non marital breakups initiated 50-50. Divorces initiated 70-30 by women. Divorce between people with higher education -- ~87-13 initiated by women. Somehow men are to blame. Nah, thanks, I'll pass on this one, there's obviously a lot more going on here than men being lazy dogs, you'd expect higher educated men to behave better, or at least not worse, right?
/r/ExRedPill02/06/21 08:12 AM
2

"I can't stand X" or "I hate X" usually means "I always fall for X and I don't know how to handle X", both in men and women.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen28/05/21 09:22 AM
0

They all say they want things casual, that's the zen of it and the only politically correct advice to give. If the guy says he wants just casual sex, LISTEN and find guys who at least say they want a relationship. Sure, that won't probably work for reasons that you listed. Most likely she's going for guys out of her league, but that's taboo to say to a woman.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen28/05/21 09:04 AM
6

You'd do the exact same thing for a hot woman. Hot people turn us on more, and when you're really turned on, certain sex acts seem less gross than in your normal state of mind. People who are into rimjobs don't just randomly give them, there's a science and method to it :)
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen24/05/21 09:21 AM
7

Well to each his own, but it is an aquired taste. Some people like switching between PIV and 69. Being so inlove, comfortable and turned on with someone that you want to stick your tongue in their nether regions is one of the highlights of a relationship.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen24/05/21 09:12 AM
1

I know people don't think that, I was just making a point. If someone(man) reads the situation correctly, there's nothing wrong with approaching someone(woman) based on looks alone. That advice just seems presumptious of "you're probably ugly yourself and shouldn't bother beautiful women" . If it's a bar, based on what criteria should a woman be approached? "Hey there pretty, I was on the fence about approaching you based on looks alone, but man can you handle yout liquor, you remind me of my al…
/r/ExRedPill22/05/21 07:49 PM
1

That's good for you, but a lot of men/women do it and for most people looks are the first filtrr for starting or not a relationship. Not approaching just based on looks is a bit saying beautiful people are dumber than average.
/r/ExRedPill22/05/21 07:37 PM
5

Male/female is a step down from man/woman, because you can refer to animals as male/females but only to humans as man/woman.
/r/ExRedPill22/05/21 07:17 PM
3

Then she she is interested in you or a "pro" of some sorts. In any case, a compliment won't make or break that interraction. Not being confident or flustered or not being able to interract, will. Abstaining from making a compliment can also make you clam up, if you feel the compliment on your tongue, better to just make it, bask in the aftermath, whatever that is.
/r/ExRedPill22/05/21 07:13 PM
1

I don't know enough about OnlyFans, but I guess that I kind of hate it because they are glorified camgirls that bait people into their onlyfans stuff. There's nothing wrong with camgirls, porn or sexwork, but those look HONEST to me. I might only see their advertisements in my incognito tabs, but with onlyfans, they advertise and market themsevles in uncanny ways.
/r/ExRedPill22/05/21 06:10 PM
4

Just be straight with her. Make her read the FDS subreddit, if it was the first time I encountered bitter sexist people, it would have shaken me as well. Bitter, sexist, lonely people produce bitter content and their echochamber can give themselves and others the impression they are right.
/r/ExRedPill22/05/21 06:02 PM
5

She is pretty, you don't know her, the fact that you even approach her is validating in itself. You should be asking yourself other questions. Did she look at you, did she indicate she is wants to or is open to being approached or is she just okish with your presence there? Complimenting a woman on looks right after you met her only works if you're hot yourself, otherwise, save it for after you've built some kind of connection. You can compliment on her dress if you know about fashion or there's…
/r/ExRedPill22/05/21 05:46 PM
1

How many people, petcentage wise do you think believe in stricter gender roles or that women should defer to men?
/r/ExRedPill20/05/21 07:45 AM
1

We all live in our own bubble, but I strongly dissagree that sexism is rampant. Just like racism is NOT rampant in the developed world. Just because there are a lot of racists out there or sexists and all you hear in your bubble is "sexism this, sexism that, racism this, racism that", it doesn't mean sexism or racism is rampant. If it's rampant now, how was it in the 50's ?
/r/ExRedPill20/05/21 07:41 AM
0

And there are regular female actors who have complained of the same, and females in every job type. You sound just like the regular FDS woman, so insecure that she feels threatened by porn.
/r/ExRedPill20/05/21 04:23 AM
2

I'm sory, but I did not get the impression this guy was patronizing about it, I'm sure some red pillers might be like that, but nowhere did I get that vibe from the video. I think it was just his expediency/brevity in discussing such a vast subject that I think gave you that vibe. I think I understand a bit about the culture, I come from Eastern Europe, where it is an economic thing now that young people stay with parents and it was a cultural thing before. It's not exactly the same, because I t…
/r/ExRedPill19/05/21 07:24 AM
-1

There is A LOT that is wrong with the porn industry and behaving as though you and 90% of men in this world are entitled to it despite the major issues that have been brought to light by that industry, there's a major problem. That IS disgusting. Lol... pornography is legal, we live in 2021, we have huge outcries about revenge porn from average women, if there were major issues with female pornstars, we'd know. Ffs, we have subreddits where women produce porn free of charge. I don't feel entitle…
/r/ExRedPill18/05/21 09:02 PM
2

I just watched the video and it seems we watched completely different videos. You created this monster strawman, brought in everything: MAGA, 'ugly farang', bad coloniser/ "orientalist", 'incel', 'woman HATER' -- and please note, I'm actually properly quoting you.
/r/ExRedPill18/05/21 08:37 PM
1

Any example of bad advice from Alexander Grace? I watched just a few of his videos and he seemed pretty reasonablr.
/r/ExRedPill18/05/21 07:51 PM
-2

90%+ of men watch porn regularly. If you want a man who doesn't watch porn, that's your prefference, just like some guy wanting to only marry a virgin, as long as you admit it's your own prefference and nothing else. If you try to belittle men for watching porn, I'm disgusted. Wow, I'm an iddiot and you need FDS to feel safe, that's ... exactly my point about FDS.
/r/ExRedPill18/05/21 04:12 PM
-2

All strawman, I did not say any of that. The whole "porn addiction", "trouble getting it up", "low testosterone", "god forbid a man won't like my unshaved netherregions" obsessions of FDS is disgusting. Barely legal porn is legal porn and there's absolutely nothing wrong with it, just like any other porn. Prostitution -- that's debatable, I wouldn't hold it against a man or a woman using the services of a sex worker, not by default. The other stuff you listed is common sense, why do you presume …
/r/ExRedPill18/05/21 03:36 PM
0

It sucks to have made a lot of bad choices with men and it sucks to be a sexless young man. But my sympathy goes to the latter.
/r/ExRedPill18/05/21 02:56 PM
-2

TRP is better at their self-improvement advice, FDS has almost zero good advice in that regard. FDS is better in advice for filtring men, TRP has negative good advice regarding filtering bad women, you will end up with bad women if you follow their advice. The FDS attitude to male sexuality is downright disgusting.
/r/ExRedPill18/05/21 02:50 PM
3

I'd sit with him on every point, some have merrit. But point out the toxic emotional manipulation bullshit.
/r/ExRedPill17/05/21 01:28 PM
1

I'm sorry, I didn't even try to stigmatize women that sleep around. As long as they are honest about everything, nothing that came before a relationship should be brought against someone in that relationship. I was just pointing out where that symetry breaks down, not even for logical reasons, keeping scores between the sexes is hard wired and difficult.
/r/ExRedPill09/05/21 06:45 PM
1

I agree "hypergamy" is not "the norm" because it is not a a black or white thing, the 10% here, 10% there are the binary outcomes some might count as "hypergamy" at play. Women wear makeup to be more attractive to men(even if indirectly, like competing with other women), men can also improve their appearence. Unfortunately it is impossible that all men increase their status because that is a zero sum game, and that is where women are shallow.
/r/ExRedPill09/05/21 02:20 PM
1

I don't think it's that, it's the fact that a young, thin, well groomed 6/10 woman can have sex with a 9/10 and get his attention, the reverse will almost never happen. Intellectually I see no problem with that, but there's something deep that feels not right, if I were to marry in my 30s(like people in the west do), with a woman that's the same value as me, but that's had a lot of fun with higher SMV men. It has nothing to do with the bullshit men are accused -- "so you're insecuuure, who hurt …
/r/ExRedPill09/05/21 01:43 PM
1

The difference doesn't have to be huge for hypergamy to be real, especially in a modern society. ~25% of norwegian men are child-less and only half that of women are childless. Something similar for young men who never had sex in the previous year vs. young women. Monogamous marriage in a modern society between intelligent and free actors will produce equal pairings. It's the 10% here, 10% there that points to the non-monogamous nature of human kind(unless you go to some shithole place, there yo…
/r/ExRedPill09/05/21 01:17 PM
1

It's not a single factor. First, to some extent they are on to some valid points, just like feminazzy have some valid points about men being rapist and agressive, not doing enough chores and so on, EXCEPT bringing up any such valid points about hypergamy or mens issue is such a great taboo. By society/mainstream media supressing such talk, they only push it underground where there are no moderate voices and only enhance the feeling of "a-haaa, I knew I was right, that's why they try to supress i…
/r/ExRedPill09/05/21 01:02 PM
5

Being in love is by no means shallow. There are people who only spend a couple of months in a relationship to ride that new relationship energy wave, rinse and repeat. Not even that is shallow if they are honest. Expecting to find a LTR where that energy lasts forever, not doing any work, expecting to magically find someone where that lasts forever is shallow.
/r/ExRedPill08/05/21 07:22 AM
1

Also, how is a +61% SMV "unrealistic"? Assuming that SMV falls into normal distribution, then on average a woman wants to marry a guy who's at least a 6 in total SMV. It's unrealistic because we're talking about the AVERAGE woman wanting to marry a man that's 61% higher value than the average man. ​ Naturally, preference doesn't always equate with actual choice. If women have casual sex with men "above their league" it would be merely because there are way too many twats willing to fuck anything…
/r/ExRedPill07/05/21 09:54 AM
2

The study does show that women lower their standards for casual sex in absolute smv. ..... Well... it's funny you'd say that... because it was a study by Douglas Kenrick... who you obviously don't know, but he's one of the old school leading Evolutionary Psychologists.. I do believe average women want and have casual sex with +45% SMV guys, because +45% SMV guys are ok with that(better than their hand), and women do want +61% SMV guys for marriage, but they actually marry +0% SMV guys, because, …
/r/ExRedPill06/05/21 11:02 PM
4

They do raise their standards for looks for one night stands however. But science doesn't care about your personal views. Thank God those studies aren't science, though. All else being equal -- unless women explicitly chose to have one night stands with beautiful hobos, or beautiful mentally impaired men -- raising their standards for looks is called raising standards, not "lowering them". By contrast men will have casual sex with less attractive women -- all else being equal, that is actually l…
/r/ExRedPill06/05/21 09:13 PM
6

but men relax their standards much more so than women for casual things Men relax their standards for casual sex, women don't relax their standards for casual sex, they have HIGHER standards for casual sex (or their true actual standards) than for marriage, BECAUSE higher value men have lower standards for sex and that is the only way most women can get a taste of a higher value man. A woman can get out the door and find someone to fuck in 5 minutes, WHY on Earth would she lower her standards fo…
/r/ExRedPill06/05/21 07:26 PM
6

​ Which is to say that men are hypogamous, it's not women that are hypergamous. That's some serious mental gymnastics right there :) Women are picky about who they marry and who they have flings with. That would be the definition of hypergamy, yes, though the underlying biological phenomenon has nothing to do with marriage, as marriage is not a biological construct. My definition of hypergamy would be that the average woman finds the average man much less desirable than the average man finds the…
/r/ExRedPill06/05/21 05:09 PM
8

Most top tier men are not dumb and won't commit to lower value women, but they will have sex with them. That is the point TheRedPill actually gets right. Women manifest their hypergamy in their 20s when they can get the attention of men above their value, but in an LTR, partners are usually closely matched. It's not that women are not picky about who they marry, it's the fact that men also have an equal saying that evens things out. Studying LTRs for hypergamy is nonsensical and has a huge survi…
/r/ExRedPill06/05/21 04:18 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter