TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

rag3light Archive

View 2 posts and 453 comments by rag3light on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
-2

If you have conditions for association those indeed are conditions you feel entitled to, DUH DOYYYY
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/25 10:41 PM
3

Pretzel logic word salad. You're incorrect that coercion is necessary for an entitlement to exist.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/25 08:08 PM
7

The irony of supporting extreme entitlement while presenting it as the opposite.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/25 08:07 PM
0

If I implied men DONT do this then you indeed admit that what you just said is a complete misread. PS stating women do x does not necessarily mean men do not do x.. So reading comprehension and basic logic are your homework now
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/25 08:01 PM
-4

Modern feminism = patriarchy 2.0 Encourages women to all sorts of sexual perversion. Encourages women to share themselves with men for superficial reasons. Encourages women to ignore how well she is treated in favor of again superficiality. Encourages women to not get married or have stable relationships and to not have children. ^ its essentially encouraging women to be homos. SAD!
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/25 05:19 PM
–

Any man who says pussy shit like morality is subjective has some personal growth to do. Women are insanely superficial and have convinced themselves that they aren't. Most men truly believe that a favorable opinion from a woman means something real: it doesn't. No woman likes a man for "who he is." They aren't equipped or incentivized to assess that. A man who has a hard time orienting his behavior to ideals and principles is just another weak simp of a man.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/25 05:10 PM
0

How can I admit something I never said or implied? Reading comprehension is a good thing for you to try.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/25 05:03 PM
1

Yup. You definitely missed the correct lines.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/25 03:04 PM
3

"Lol" you should actually just check your reading comprehension actually
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/25 05:46 AM
3

Yeah bro, that's what he meant: that his law applying to the entire animal kingdom didn't apply to human beings. Except that's not what's talking about here. Stand down wikipedia warrior.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/25 09:31 PM
0

All I know about Destiny is that he got publicly humiliated, rather than 'self-justify' bad behaviors. First, you're wrong that ENM is a 'complex ethical landscape.' It really isn't. You agree on terms with a partner, then adhere to them. The people who engage in ENM are far more likely to just be shitty duplicitous shysters. It's like how libertarianism attracts racist fuckwits. There's no group for shitty duplicitous shysters, hell, even Satanists have rebranded to be just 'good people who hap…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/25 09:29 PM
3

Lol at this bullshit. Translation: I WANT AN UPGRADE TO MY LIFESTYLE ON HIS DIME, I don't want to REMAIN AT MY LIFESTYLE. You are not interested in someone who makes less than you --- unless he's much much more attractive. Women will eagerly support gigolos. It's probably going to become an epidemic in a few years.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/25 09:13 PM
9

Why are they the worst? They’re not into you for you, they’re into the material stuff you can bring. People who say this always come off as warp speed fuckclowns. Like what is this nebulous 'you,' you speak of? Women like men mainly because of a perceived differential in status and the biggest conveyor of that in everyday life is looks. Women (ALL WOMEN) do not like men for 'them.' They ALWAYS like men for whatever the man provides for them. That's Briffault's law. This reads like 16 year old wr…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/25 09:11 PM
2

It's definitely propaganda. Go back to the 70s-2000s. Plenty of anti mom go go career woman messaging is there. Social media has just shown the world how women really are: concerned with fitting in above everything else. Truly it is not female nature or any of that shit (beyond the desire to fit in). A culture that sets good values and enforces them will have good women. The biggest feminist lie repeated by the red pill is that this ass out clown behavior from women is just the default. It isn't…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/25 05:23 AM
–

G1 dude who is also at a computer typing.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/25 04:11 AM
2

I never even legitimized them with confrontation. Ignore, walk off. lol. Nice to know someone else has seen these spaces for the bullshit they are. I mean, because truly...people who talk in codes and have to all but wear decoder rings about their fucking need to get over themselves. Society is already swinging and polyamorous. Dudes fuck each other's wives, men juggle multiple women. But in mainstream society it's on the man's terms, and in these spaces, it's on the women's. In the end, I reali…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/25 01:21 AM
2

lol ya that chick who literally invented made up fantasy relationship was a leader in a group. now that you mention it, one of the two chicks who started rumors about me alleging they'd slept with me when I hadn't (and never would) also was a queen bee. dude it's the nature of female led spaces: perversion. weirdness. and a bunch of simps desperately following the leader. I wouldn't mind it so much but like idk...the hotness just never was even close to the amount of crazy. that was my main grip…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/25 01:11 AM
1

The home is the scariest place for women when there is a male partner involved, https://tenor.com/xB1v.gif
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/25 01:04 AM
2

I know how: personal experience backed by the research. It's very simple and stupid. The blackpill is right about superficiality but way wrong on the cause. They bleat about genetics and biology like the academic fucktastrophes they are. Women like WHAT THEY ARE TOLD TO LIKE. It really is that simple. If cultural messaging clustered around 'ugly short loser whoever' being a sexy beast and a physically hot man, then guess what? That phenotype would go gangbusters and women would be creaming thems…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/25 12:57 AM
1

All women are shallow. :)
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/25 12:48 AM
0

LOL what a crock of shit. Women have an innate fear of men they THINK ARE UGLY AND DON'T KNOW. remember kids at home: almost all rape comes from men WOMEN CHOOSE TO SPEND TIME WITH AND BE WITH. most MALE FEMALE DV comes from men WOMEN CHOOSE TO ENTER INTO RELATIONSHIPS with. the men getting restraining orders etc. are the men WOMEN CHOOSE. Men ACTUALLY have a LOT MORE TO FEAR FROM BEING ALONE because THEY ARE ACTUALLY the vast majority of victims of MALE violence. So many of these feminist bulls…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/25 12:44 AM
0

If 1. paternity tests were mandatory upon birth and 2. if, in states allowing abortion, the man could quit all rights to a child as a matter of course, then.... ...you'd see a lot of women straighten up REAL QUICK.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/25 12:41 AM
1

AOL Voice Goodbye
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/25 12:38 AM
2

Wrong again. AWALT. Average women are getting exactly what they want. They want crumbs of men above them in any way at all because it confirms they are of the caliber of person they always 'imagined themselves to be.' Plus now they have stories similar to the stories of their friends --- AND THAT is what REALLY COUNTS FOR WOMEN: FITTING IN.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/25 12:34 AM
2

I never was a member of any of it. I just casually dated/fucked around with women who were 'polyamorous' and 'swingers,' etc. I'd say there was a good 3-4 years of being a 'wild and crazeee guy' who cast a wider net for my sex partners. So I observed several cliques and groups. Highlights polyam comm: Complete asshole behavior by these polyam chicks, like more than once come over to their place and we're fwb and I'd have to wait before fucking because the chick is doing some dumb shit that she K…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/25 12:30 AM
–

Virtually 0 women prioritize character who the shit are you kidding
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/25 10:04 PM
0

There is no such thing as ENM. As a dude who's been casual in swinger communities, poly communities, etc. Let me tell you: 100% toxic bullshit. And honestly the spaces tend to be more or less female led which read: exploitation. Very standard polyamory mid chick wants to fuck hawt d00ds and have some schlepp be her emotional tampon. They lie and cheat very often as well. The swinging community is gatekept and toxic and misandrist af against single men. Literally as a single guy in that community…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/25 10:02 PM
3

Nope. Average women are getting the attention they want. You don't get it. An average woman "complaining" about some dude busting on her face and kicking her out and ghosting is just low key bragging. Yes. That's how it is.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/25 09:49 PM
1

Yeah bro EVERYONE can self improve into the topic x %. Like I'm not sitting and wallowing in anything but wisdom. I've been with more women than likely most every guy here which is why it's so easy for me to call bullshit on so much of this. Literally I have DONE self improvement that makes the difference. And guess what? IT IS FUCKED UP what men ACTUALLY need to do to improve to be worthy of love vs women who are told they are just wonderful for existing and farting. Its fucked up that women wa…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/25 02:59 PM
3

Lmfao space cadet OP. Literally landwhales and grandmas get tons of men in their DMs and offered DATES. This research has been done. OP is a lame psyops
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/25 02:54 PM
-3

OP fails to understand men and women are different Women are value takers aka star fuckers who want to get as much as possible while giving as little as possible. 1:1 is the danger zone to dumpville. Which is why women don't mind and oft times even secretly like men who have the ability to/actually do cheat on them. Further in modern times IMO any dude who is in an LTR and isn't cheating is taking way too much of a risk. Women have such skewed smv due to social norms and propaganda that they pra…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/25 12:39 AM
–

Yes. This is why the bible says women are saved through child birth. Slowly this culture is relearning very old teachings the hard way
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/25 05:27 PM
1

Disconfirmed by the severe traumatic damage that sexual abuse causes but also the fact that the drive to reproduce underpins the entire species and indeed the entire animal kingdom. I understand TRP wants desperately to be badass but sometimes commonsense is too strong
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/25 05:09 PM
1

Yeah you're just playing "I'm a bad faith fallacy user" bingo now. Exceptions prove the rule and now, "only a loser would call attention to the issue." Fallacies != points
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/25 12:17 AM
–

Because women orgasm from rape about as much as they do with a freely chosen partner and research shows they get aroused from a far wider range of visual stimuli than they admit to... ...I'm gonna call bullshit on female standards representing what can sexual arouse pr attract them and more represent aspirational social status seeking. So ya I call bullshit on women just being unable to copulate with 80% of men due to arbitrary mental "no Asians nothing less than 6 feet etc' That's fucktarded.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/25 08:20 AM
–

LMFAO Men who disagree with you aren't per se abusive. I'm sorry there simply aren't that many genius machiavellian manipulators to go around. Per research men who both hate women and men who believe women are inferior DO THE BEST WITH WOMEN. The men who do the worst with them are egalitarians. So called incels are more likely to hold such views. In fact the over the top vitriol from that camp comes from the extreme disillusionment of having that worldview cracked. Vs. A salty Sam like me who ju…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/25 08:15 AM
–

Of course she did. Female behavior over the last 60 years is the ultimate argument against feminism.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/25 08:12 AM
-1

Nope. Her mind does it
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/25 03:13 AM
0

Yes to women vague ambiguous standards controlled solely by them and allow them to neglect and terminate the relationship at any time on a whim do matter. A lot. Men have clear up front concrete needs.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/25 03:08 AM
0

Lol ugly and short aren't the same thing. Obviously the short dude must have been good looking. Especially if you and those other chicks overlooked his shortness. Like Jesus christ I love when women spend one week bragging about their character detection abilities and the next pretending they don't know their elbow from their ass about it
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/25 03:06 AM
2

^ weaponized incompetence Like she's given simple rules and just thinks of some dumb situation that anyone with a brain could solve i.e. 0 friends = less info = utilize other methods.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/25 03:03 AM
1

How was barack obama president if there's also racism in the USA? Like did you seriously ask how you could have a good life if a systemic problem exists? I say again: goddamn people are thick
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/25 02:56 AM
0

Yeah the female responses name vague subjective qualities that only they can be the judges of i.e. moving target. Male responses far more concrete.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/25 02:55 AM
0

Not really. The men women like the most are benevolenty sexist and misogynistic. A distant third are progressive/egalitarian men :)
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/25 12:37 AM
4

It really is the simplest goddamn thing. Women refuse to just accept that x or y is way out of their league and that's not gonna end well. Basic adult fax
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/25 12:36 AM
2

The men you haven't met? Goddamn....like idiocy
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/25 12:35 AM
6

Because women on the one hand are up their own asses and pretend thst they can SENSE CHARACTER ON SIGHT I.e. UR PERSONALITY ONLINE IS BAD BRO WOMEN CAN SENSE IT MMHM U HATE WOMEN WOMEN DONT LIKE THAT Same woman: why do I keep choosing men who beat the shit out of me? They're all genius machiavellian manipulators! Like common sense. *if you're doing 100% of the pursuing, the dude doesn't like you and just wants pussy Basic. Shit.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/25 12:34 AM
3

This is just false narrative. Women will claim men lie and lead them on when the dude straight up from the start will tell them what the deal is. We've all been in this situation where you pretty much are UP FRONT AND CLEAR and the chick just will still say you treated her like shit and lied and blah blah fucking blah. Like there are bad men but much less than is claimed.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/25 12:31 AM
1

K bro now understand that systemic problems usually make it impossible for an individual to make a great life for themselves... Like goddamn people are thick.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/25 12:21 AM
-2

Blowjobs and sex on demand She's hot She'd make a good mother. She's not a ball buster. She's loyal.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/25 03:52 PM
–

Its not about what I could do it's about what I want to spend time doing
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/25 12:00 PM
–

Because it's not just about if she likes me lmfao. Women really do have their heads up their asses. Like omg wowowow a woman likes me oh la la. I have to like her. Women like woman A GENERALLY are of a certain demeanor, attitude, and history. So no thanks to her.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/25 11:58 AM
1

Empathy gap writ large. Literally attempting to marginalize and MUTE human suffering. Lmfao
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/25 11:54 AM
2

Typically the notion that individual action can meaningfully address a systemic issue.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/25 11:51 AM
–

Fashion is just a good way to know who to is who and if women collectively get modest it's going to be harder to do that.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/25 05:35 PM
–

I didn't say anything about fashion being fluid dude. I said looking for substance in fashion is a fool's errand
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/25 05:26 PM
1

That's right! :) Let it sink in.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/25 05:26 PM
–

^ chat gpt
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/25 05:18 PM
0

Go read about the GENERAL SOCIAL PHENOMENON of the paradox of declining female happiness for yourself and then you can come here and discuss it. Not really my burden to educate on the well known and obvious facts attendant to a topic. But hey okay let's just address this notion that other things have changed besides feminism. Sure. And a lot of them ARE CORRELATED WITH FEMINIST beliefs. Whether it's promiscuity, single motherhood, breakup of marriages and nuclear family, etc. But hey let's reall…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/25 05:17 PM
–

Corporate influence is subsumed in cultural and social explanation, of which i assign a primary role in the malaise we experience today. It's an open secret that the ad industry is all about various psy ops preying on consumer insecurity and shaping opinion. Most people around here just love to dick ride MUH BIOLOGY when they have 0 clue about it
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/25 05:13 PM
–

Actually it's tough. 1 good thing about today is that sluts look like sluts and mostly you get women on the continuum from virgin to slut in appearance replete with a sliding scale from pristine skin to Celtic cross tat sleeve bullshit and other adornments. No ID system is perfect of course but it has never been easier to identify women to avoid than today. The irony is that most men lack the experience to develop strong boundaries and discernment to take advantage. But at the same time worrying…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/25 05:10 PM
1

Yes and I addressed this very point. Read the whole comment. Obviously THE BALANCE of those desires in opposing directions favors the old way because women were happier with the old way.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/25 05:06 PM
-4

Buddy women don't respond to masculinity or boldness or whatever stupid shit. Like do you think women have vaginas that double as IQ tests, funny meters, and personality psychological batteries? NO. Women like what they are told to like. As in whatever society seems to value. So a certain look race and height mainly. Your notions about manning up are trite, foolish and illogical. In fact most people who are successful don't have to put work in and women certainly are propped up and considered go…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/25 05:04 PM
-1

the data shows that women were happier (much happier) in the past suggesting them feeling bad about not having credit cards or men mansplaining or whatever was better than the world of freedom they received. Now you want to say "oh happiness isn't relevant" when 5. Of your argument rests on HAPPINESS. Goddamn, son.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/25 04:57 PM
2

This post is nonsense. Everyone being top X% isn't a solution. It's not even an accurate portrayal of current life.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/25 08:26 AM
3

Yeah so you're equivocating all the waves of feminism...par for the liberal shill course, but let's go with it. Newsflash: women are EVEN MORE UNHAPPY with freedom if research is to be believed. It actually has a name: the paradox of declining female happiness. And the declining fertility rate certainly suggests that the current cultural climate is not so good for the future. Old school patriarchy ensured that women were genuinely attracted to more or most men because institutional and social no…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/25 08:24 AM
-1

Lmfao I'm so glad I'm not the only one who sees the circus in these exchanges
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/25 11:47 PM
-2

Make up your mind. Either all elements comprising social value equate to competence or competence is something separate from social value, which is what hypergamy is concerned with. She's looking for the best one SHE THINKS SHE CAN GET i.e. available
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/25 11:46 PM
0

Yeah apparently you're unfamiliar with an inductive argument and undisputed facts and propositions. It's definitely not the same as trust me bro :) Who am I to judge your standards or common modern standards? Someone looking at female happiness, fertility rate, etc. You know tanking indicators of human wellness. Yeah again you're just asserting most marriages were "for the kids" and the like when again data shows women were happier back then and marriages were happier. Which is weird cause you k…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/25 11:19 PM
0

And you concede that you cannot contend with the argument. Thank you.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/25 10:47 PM
1

While it wouldn't be the first time I would have to walk someone through the sophistry machine that is nuancepill, it's really irrelevant about the state of play today, the idea is that this will happen in the future.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/25 10:47 PM
1

Ignoring the thinly veiled personal attacks, I'm unsure how you speculating regarding the level of happiness of your ancestors sheds any real light. You asserted you have higher standards for your partner but that's the point: maybe a lot of the standards women have these days are mostly superficial nonsense. Your mom and grandmother's had families children and good times. For whatever reason a stable partner isn't seen as a great thing. Or women assert that "being an unwed mother" was judged as…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/25 10:35 PM
1

Except black happiness has trended upward since then :) Yes that's true that both social and institutional norms favored relationships. No complaints or refutations there. I stated as much in my OP. Your source is riddled with fallacies and is so obviously agenda driven. Either cite a peer reviewed source of ill just ignore it as a waste of time.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/25 10:28 PM
1

No, you JUST ASSERTED THAT. You gave no indication as to WHY that would be the case. Therefore you did not refute anything. Do you even know what an argument is? It's not "NUH UH." Further you second point was anticipated by my last paragraph; opportunity for what in the case of SOCIAL NORMS? Are you saying blacks in the south didn't actually feel inferior to medicore whites doing medicore things, too? I assure you regimes built on social inferiority work, financial component or no. Do you think…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/25 10:21 PM
0

Yeah you really don't seem to understand hypergamy as a concept.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/25 10:16 PM
–

Yeah 101 level undisputed facts of this space. It's not my job to bring you up to basic scratch on a topic. Google it. The burden of proof doesn't apply to foundational "is the sky blue" knowledge. Stop abusing it. Yeah like women have become richer gained in social status and education and political power! :) And their happiness naturally has....cratered. :) :) :) :)
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/25 10:13 PM
0

You aren't refuting it, you actually simply aren't addressing it. I said a society where women generally feel inferior to every man satisfies female hypergamy for a wider range of men. You just say "nope they still wouldn't be satisfied." It's like you're assuming the lower status can only come from money or something rather than tons of social norms as well.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/25 10:07 PM
-1

Ok so you reject hypergamy as the source of female attraction. Hypergamy as used in this space refers to a woman being attracted to her social betters. It's not the classical definition and people constantly try to equivocate. Since you just reject hypergamy as playing a role in female attraction contra research anecdote and pretty much the entire space's notion of attraction there's really not a lot of common ground here.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/25 10:04 PM
1

Another self evidently wrong statement. Look at you go
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/25 09:54 PM
-2

You can argue that women genuinely attracted to their partners combined with a stable family unit likely would not have any connection with female happiness if you want. 😀
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/25 09:54 PM
-1

Ok so only money and degrees contribute to social value according to you, a self evidently incorrect statement and where we can agree to disagree.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/25 09:52 PM
–

Yeah because that data. Most real data, really, isn't so good for feminism. I get it. Handwave away
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/25 09:51 PM
0

Lol man social value must be limited to money and degrees then. Like.....don't quote my logic if you haven't gotten it. Literally everything people are judged socially on comprises social value
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/25 09:48 PM
0

Hypergamy exists, hypergamy drives female attraction. In the past women via cultural fiat were made inferior in social status to men. Therefore, women likely were attracted genuinely to more men. Diagrammed it for you since you needed help
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/25 09:47 PM
0

Hypergamy isn't made up Lower female social status in the past isn't made up The logical implications of both aren't made up. But sure keep lying?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/25 09:45 PM
1

It is definitely example of how abstract thought quickly eludes people such as yourself. Childhood doesn't end because childhood is bad or good, it ends because of totally separate reasons right? Wooooooooow. Almost as if the end of an era fails to comment much on the merits of that era. Wooooow.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/25 09:44 PM
0

No it didn't. You apparently don't realize why the end of anything fails to comment meaningfully about its merit.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/25 09:43 PM
-1

You defaulted to the feminist characterization of those times. Like your odds for being in a happy marriage were pretty high back then if data is to be believed!
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/25 09:42 PM
-1

I am debating in good faith. Let me spell it out clearer: PEOPLE ARE ACTING LIKE HYPERGAMY ONLY APPLIES TO MONEY WHEN IT DOES NOT. SOCIAL VALUE is not solely determined by money.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/25 09:40 PM
–

Women were happier then. They must have been lying eh? 😀
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/25 09:39 PM
-2

I rely on the presence of more marriages, earlier marriage age, lower rates of divorce, falling happiness for women, aka BASIC UNDISPUTED facts of discussion. Like if you need someone to prove 101 sky is blue knowledge to you on a topic you are not sufficiently versed in it. You seem confounded by the notion that women feeling genuine attraction for a man would make her happier in a relationship.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/25 09:38 PM
0

Lol this culture still shows patriarchy. And yeah I get it, that's your assertion. Please now engage with the argument put forth.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/25 09:35 PM
-2

You don't seem to understand what an inductive argument via syllogism and principle is which is why you would smugly say something that just makes you seem ignorant.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/25 05:36 PM
-3

So what you did is amalgate all workers into one, which includes workers AT THE TOP OF THE DISTRIBUTION WHERE INCOME HAS INDEED RISEN THE MOST. Note how my chart is for the average worker. As usual, the liberal projects.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/25 05:33 PM
-5

You don't know what an opinion is and you don't seem to understand what "undisputed concepts" are such as hypergamy. No thanks. You can clean up your act by ceasing to spit out nonsense such as making the assumption that the only single men are "antisocial autists." Maybe lighten up on the mental health slurring that HELLA TYPIFIES A HVM BRO lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/25 05:32 PM
-4

https://www.weforum.org/stories/2019/04/50-years-of-us-wages-in-one-chart/ Now scramble and try to pass off some BS 10-15 percent increase to workers making like 15 bucks an hour represents meaningful growth. Liberals live to lie
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/25 05:30 PM
-7

My boy over here arguing with the fact of stagnant at best wages over half a century or so....
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/25 05:24 PM
-1

While in the meantime making women less happy, destroying the family, destroying marriage, relationships, monogamy, etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/25 05:21 PM
-2

I can't believe people were baited by this fallacious question. If childhood is so great why does it end? If the golden age of ____ was so great why did it end? What a dumb train of thought
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/25 05:20 PM
-1

Then same to you. When you've been around triple digit style, you'll encounter many things both amazing and wretched. I'll agree that on average women are pretty shit at blowjobs (despite thinking they're awesome at them).
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/25 05:09 PM
1

Lmfao nope
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/25 03:57 PM
2

Lol "Look good, be popular, which is mostly about looking good." There's nothing beyond that to teach
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/25 03:57 PM
0

Um no that's not how burdens of proof work
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/25 03:55 PM
0

Yes they are. They are saying that the rape and violence against women means they suffer more than the men who are tortured and murdered.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/25 03:54 PM
23

"....and don't even feel that good for the guy." Come back when you've gained the necessary experience boyo.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/25 03:34 PM
0

Then your head is in the sand. I have no use for people who can't see reality
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/25 06:07 PM
–

If you're white. Yes. Do you not understand racial dynamics?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/25 06:02 PM
0

Blah blah blah and you essentially admit that you only think men are to blame..NEXT
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/25 06:02 PM
1

100 years vs 40. 40 years men have been educated about women. 0 years have women specifically received education on male issues. 100 years or so regarding voting which unsurprisingly is completely irrelevant here! So no you raising a hoot makes 0 sense. There is no reason women. Would understand men better when men have received so much messaging and women haven't And yes recognizing real issues and the effects and causes of them will do a lot to end this gaslighting era of stupidity. Yeah you a…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/25 05:21 PM
–

Lol "I want to be shallow without anyone saying I'm shallow" Lmfao
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/25 05:14 PM
–

Women simply aren't that complicated and no one is buying this bullshit anymore. Social attractiveness + attainability = your type
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/25 05:13 PM
–

Or wanting to feel more dominant than your partner especially if you're white.... Like I mean let's not act like the hidden motivators for attraction aren't many and varied
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/25 05:11 PM
–

Nonsense. Fat women are partnered. Plenty of fat and slim men unpartnered due to female "standards "
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/25 05:09 PM
–

Because the truth is that women don't have a type beyond social desirability bias/"what kinda person i wanna be" Sorry women orgasm from random stranger rape as often as they do from a partner. Were all the same species. So this female selectivity bs is almost entirely mental and linked to cultural belief
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/25 05:08 PM
–

Yeah pandering and appeasement is a great idea and won't lead to massive hoeflation
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/25 05:06 PM
–

Lol how the fuck do you even know then if you've only had one partner?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/25 05:04 PM
–

Lol justifies dumb shitty behavior CUZ ITS JUST GENEZ TRUST MY NON BIOLOGY PHD GUYZ
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/25 04:58 PM
–

A bad boy typically has enough popularity to bully others or coerce which is what makes him exciting.....sometimes it's good looks sometimes height etc. The main point is women like the dumb shit they complain about and lie about it on top of that
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/25 04:57 PM
–

Women thinking they can actually judge those qualities apart from the halo effect is always hilarious and empirically disconfirmed
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/25 04:54 PM
–

Ya except men partner up with bigger women. Like women who pull the "everyone has preferences teehee!" Are so tired. Bruh not many guys can exercise theirs. Most women can. Women are deliberately stupid on this issue and men are on to it
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/25 04:53 PM
–

Since most bad boys are unemployed abusive social leeches etc. Why would we want to be happy for them? Lol@ that low key shade mixed with "i guess I'm just naturally better" at your former friend. You guys aren't friends anymore because you're likely a shitty passive aggressive individual
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/25 04:51 PM
3

Nope. Men understand women far more than the reverse. Society has been drilling men about women's issues in detail for generations now. Women act like men's issues don't exist. These "it's all the same on both sides" pseudo profound posts need to get lost
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/25 04:36 PM
1

Yeah that stuff is fine but ultimately useless if THE BEHAVIOR OF WOMEN is not addressed because 1. Women will tear those spaces down at a whim 2. Women will not give the social feedback or mirror the groups message which renders them fairly ineffective. Note how female body positivity is PUSHED ON EVERYONE? Whereas male body positivity would be like a private "male only" thing?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/25 04:33 PM
0

Most guys aren't engaging in shitty behavior beyond consuming content and at worst sharing war stories between one another. Like once again we're here talking about how men are somehow to be taken as an equal part of the problem when that's bullshit. Then you wander off attempting to suggest that individual action on the part of a man can somehow free him from a SYSTEMIC ISSUE in society.....which is nonsense. Bro. It isn't a cycle of back and forth. It is one side 80/90% being propped up and in…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/25 04:30 PM
0

I like when people dress the core issue up into some pontificating BS that itself is still just a symptom of something else. Like for all its faults, TRP/blackpill whatever does get right that WOMEN are driving the discontent and the insulation women receive prevents their behavior or choices from being meaningfully criticized. Like it's entirely stupid to claim that the issue here is that women AND men are becoming more narcissistic for ex.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/25 08:05 AM
1

The most reprehensible men are also highly chosen by women. So.....
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/25 08:01 AM
-2

Women have doubled down on being dismissive, condescending, and gaslighting since men started raising issues. And I'm pretty sure it's possible they will lose a lot of "ground" due to this refusal to interact with men.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/25 07:57 AM
1

Um. So red pill / black pill shouldn't be accepted or rejected based on someone inability to process reality. If the ideologies more accurately describe reality your OP is just that the truth feels too bad.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/25 07:55 AM
–

Braindead OP (par for OPs course) failing to reckon with the fact that there's no there there. Women don't care about much more beyond how hot and popular a guy is. Women also have no clue about the skill involved with becoming popular due to being insanely blinded by female social inclusion privilege
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/25 07:53 AM
5

No. Guys in maybe the top 1-5% act like that. And even then, the men are still more straightforward than women are. Generally women complain about men who treat them the way they prefer to treat most men. This rule holds shockingly true.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/25 07:51 AM
1

No. We aren't. I pointed to the most literal counter example to illustrate that cultural ethos has been and can be different and talking about now as if it is forever is unhelpful. And it is changing. Not that fast. But your attitude about said change being impossible isn't helping anything. Yes women like to pretend that they don't contribute to male issues because they are emapthy-fucktarded...what a surprise.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/25 01:49 PM
0

Join the freemasons where you cannot unilaterally join and must be sponsored..boy you really know your stuff Grade: D-
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/25 01:46 PM
-1

Literally not true as there literally was a cavalry whose job it was to at least reinforce and save certain military units of men on the battlefield. Like the "now is forever" crap is so tiresome. No my dude. There have been cultural timelines where people counted on one another. Higher trust.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/25 05:38 PM
–

Yeah no all these ugly dweeb guys are getting hookups and gfs and treating them like shit en masse, another braindead fakenews OP
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/25 04:28 PM
0

I stated a fact correctly. You made a knee jerk assumption in response. Still waiting on that response to the point tho
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/25 01:42 PM
1

Yeah you're just stringing incoherent concepts together in an attempt to deliberately miss the point. ✌️
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/25 12:10 PM
3

They aren't. They will find a way to invite themselves
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/25 12:10 PM
0

Guess the entire epidemic is in everyone's heads. Thanks gaslighting commenter!
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/25 09:59 AM
-4

Women invade these spaces and pollute the dynamics. It's not very hard to see how it happens for those who can examine life with open eyes
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/25 09:58 AM
1

Yes any political faction to gain traction must capture capital and appeal to its interests so no, you're not making a real point. Just go read federalist 10, Jesus christ. People going off on these tangents that just reveal they have 0 clue how the process works at all
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/25 09:56 AM
-2

That entire way of thinking is stupid and needs to be thrown out
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/25 09:19 AM
-1

Women are aware and they do not give a shit. They will go out of their way to shift focus, play oppression Olympics, derail, and outright encourage ignoring all male issues. Even as the country started a hard turn to the right and continued on with this election women are still utilizing the same playbook. Issue is that more and more men are left out everyday which is why we are starting to see the backlash. I doubt they'll change tactics. Women don't have much to offer in these domains beyond s…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/25 09:18 AM
1

I'm not your research assistant cite your source and explain its context and relevance to the discussion. Spoiler alert: there is none, since you're equivocating between all manner of rights and privileges and tossing in some slippery slope silliness to boot.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/25 08:23 AM
0

You can use whatever sneaky terminology you want. Equating privileges and rights, etc. Attempting to legitimize one group taking advantage of another group by being subsidized by them then based on said subsidy concluding that they are now better than the average of that group, etc. All indicates what we already know: women will obfuscate and lie to avoid accountability
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/25 05:50 AM
1

I understand politics and I understand that the bloc you're talking about is losing power. Their ability to hit back has increasingly relied on lies and distortions and feigned ignorance. Hence the ascendancy of opposition.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/25 05:46 AM
-2

Women aren't fighting any of that via their current mating choices so idk why you're trying to shoehorn that in. If anything what women respond to romantically is only further entrenching those ideologies. So stop conflating female superficiality and hypergamy with all these lofty social goals. They aren't even close to the same. The bottom line is that increasing superficiality leaves an increasing amount of men out which will create a large bloc of men who are not so keen on women. Your argume…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/25 05:44 AM
1

While it's very typical of the immature to attempt to equate the personal with the statistical trend usually in service of concoction some ass out assumption serving as an insult, try responding to the point made :)
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/25 05:38 AM
1

But you're fine propping yourself up on their backs by being a negative net tax burden, utilizing affirmative action, and shielding yourself with outdated patriarchal norms such as weaponized incompetence or innocence (damsel in distress 0 accountability/white woman tears etc) when convenient. Such integrity!
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/25 03:47 PM
-2

Yes you cherry picked. Point blank you are wrong if you are stating that women have worked in the same way men have or even close to parity. And since you seem to want to belabor a falsehood there's no room for productive discussion i.e. my original point
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/25 02:36 PM
1

Ok so dad bods are trending in a meaningless way. And now you're trying to deny the success of the women's body positivity movement and the LACK of one for men. All body types of women enjoy meaningful i.e. SEXUAL validation. You can look at the porn hub searches and touch grass yourself. The only thing that makes a man shame women is CHOICE. When you have a lot of options yes you get picky. That is maybe 10% of men tops. The other 90% (women aren't that interested in) aren't shaming women. Most…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/25 02:32 PM
1

And you start by deliberately distorting my position because....hey clear good faith discussion, who needs it?! It's not just Megyn kelly. You're aware that citing an example that is prominent is used to indicate broader trends among normal people i.e. a shit ton of women (most) are the same. Generally if political group A is socially oppressing or pissing off political group B, then political group B tends to hit back....politically. that you are so confused by this or that an increasingly marg…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/25 02:28 PM
-5

No. The OP did not say any of what you said. You engaged in creative fiction in bad faith. You didn't argue anything. legislative process responsive to cultural trends and political factions != destroy rights for whatever reason in whatever way Like this is what happens when you try to "I'm so clever" in bad faith. You end up writing a story that fails to even get on the points radar and makes childish inapt analogies. In a democracy you could say ANY political faction could take any other facti…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/25 02:23 PM
-1

Dad bods are such a trend that male tinder users use anabolic steroids and develop eating disorders at a rate dozens times the normal male average.....because sexual attraction for dad bods are trending 🙄 Body positivity does and only skews toward women AINEC Ah and here we come to it: your default assumption is that women offer more than men. Because that is beyond incorrect and leads into you asserting that women "do everything" ever we can just agree to disagree. Let me know when your tour of…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/25 02:15 PM
0

I'm disappointed that you immediately felt the need to remove all nuance from my response in the first sentence before bemoaning how "mental gymnastics are painting people as black and white." You just fucking did it. Sometimes phenomena have clear causes and effects. THIS one is caused by current cultural norms attached to femininity and enacted by and enforced by women. Example: When a man would get kicked out of a club for pinching a woman's a ass and maybe arrested for SA, tipsy women "SA" m…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/25 02:12 PM
0

Hypergamy in the modern parlance refers to more than the traditional meaning tied strictly to marrying up in money. Idk why women or anyone keeps trying to shoehorn that into the discussion when it largely refers to female sexual attraction being driven by a perceived differential in smv between her and he. Due mostly to a physical attraction imbalance ut can result from status, wealth, :::height::;; imbalances, etc. A psychology today article repeated your point regarding women supposedly now h…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/25 02:00 PM
-4

None that you responded to so just unsurprising you'd believe there were none.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/25 01:58 PM
-1

Tells me it is important to look at data without bias. Cherry picks data that fails to meaningfully support the thesis.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/25 01:51 PM
-3

Really 8 hours of office work versus the 10 minutes of toilet cleaning? Like the women are desperate to distort this conversation at all costs lol
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/25 01:48 PM
-6

Lol a reply that proves my point via delusional assertion and hysterical rationalization
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/25 01:43 PM
-2

Lol the gift that keeps on giving lmfao Human rights and nature are reciprocal. Comprehension, knowledge, empathy, and wisdom are a huge you problem.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/25 01:42 PM
1

Show us when you learned the difference between significant and insignificant or when you forgot the same to trump up and distort a narrative
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/25 01:40 PM
–

Lmfao at this warpNarc 9 diatribe. We got projection we got baby out with bathwater because ego we got hypocrisy regarding civility. Young women could be taught to view and treat men as humans on a basis beyond attraction. Culture could condition more different male phenotypes to be seen as attractive: if you disagree then why is the female body positivity movement championed for exactly the same goal/reason? Plenty could be done to prevent young men from being radicalized. It involves being tre…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/25 09:23 AM
-2

Goddammit comments like this are sad to read. Have some fucken pride, boyo. Maybe the value is and has always been the same and the culture has warped the perception of it
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/25 09:19 AM
-8

I'm so glad you see clearly that yes, women simply cannot be accountable for anything. Your little rarionalizing derailing screed cum "reasoning" comment brought us to the head of it. You agree that women can't be accountable which means they really can't be full people. I mean take this comment as example. The OP presents his opinion and reasons in good faith and you prove your point by responding with a bad faith creative writing exercise full of hyperbole and derailment of crybaby woe is me v…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/25 09:16 AM
3

I was raised in a red state and you're way overselling how much politics bleeds into actual take to the bank ACTION. Conservative women also simultaneously vote against their interest and drive more men to vote against their interest as well, if you want to look at it that way.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/25 09:09 AM
2

Hypergamy and hoeflation definitely is well within and among conservative women. You think they don't want rich chads or something? Wtf. More importantly these women still promote bad ideologies in their daily lives. A vote in a ballot box is nothing compared to that. Shit Megyn Kelly, conservative superstar very recently shamed George stephanoplous over his height several times literally for no reason due to his defamation suit against trump. ^ promoting outdated ideologies; alienating frustrat…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/25 09:02 AM
–

Like people who lack empathy for roughly 50% of the population. Sounds like a great leadership recipe. Grade: D- It was an F but the irony of this in combination with your first comment yielded ironic comedic value.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/25 08:58 AM
1

What a non sequitur lol ya it's weak to push back against those who are trying to stomp you down.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/25 08:57 AM
-8

Women are wanting and expecting far more than what they offer. Hence hypergamy is wanting someone better looking richer smarter etc. This leads to a situation where dating becomes winner take all, not unlike polygynous societies. Which means that an increasing number of men are left out of romantic and also now because we live in a coed culture, social and career opportunities. Women refuse to acknowledge how females shunning a man can harm his social and career prospects as well. Social capital…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/25 08:54 AM
-3

More exaggerating to attempt to equalize what is not equal circa 1924 women spent on average 4 hours per day on "household" chores. The "some" women you're referring to who were gainfully employed shoveling shit more or less comprised 5% of women circa 1900. Like this whole stupid narrative is spun from wholecloth.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/25 08:41 AM
-3

Working for husband vs working for a boss? Working to build and ensure your family's legacy vs. A stranger's?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/25 08:35 AM
0

Literally every metric of human well being has shown that concurrent with feminism women are less happy, more mentally ill, stressed, and unfulfilled than ever before. Every time I hear these people talk about women being forced into marriages like they lived in hell and there was just a grand conspiracy hiding it it's like lmfao. Feminism is satanic. Point blank, kids. Destroying/destroyed the nuclear family, destroyed male spaces, destroyed courtship, destroyed mental health, destroying the po…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/25 08:31 AM
1

Significantly doesnt mean meaningfully. But since you want to double down on stupid....after 40 a man is about 30% less likely to conceive meaning he's 70% likely to conceive. After a woman passes 40 she's down to either 10% or <5% depending on whether you use yearly or monthly. Further males experience on average a 4-18% drop in fertility per 20 years. So when a man is in his 60s, he'll be worse case scenario around 40% capacity. Women hit zero at around 45ish But hey don't reality get in the w…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/25 08:13 AM
4

Lmfao Nope. As much as the mainstream wants to try: men and women are not the same. Male strength doesn't peak until the 30s btw. Countless surveys and data from real men and women show that male peak age is anywhere from 30s to 50s whereas females top out around 22. Anecdotally I can tell you my 30s >>>>>>>>> 20s. Further male fertility NEVER experiences a decline in the way female fertility does, even if you include the extension possible with IVF. Virtually 0 women can carry babies after 48 o…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/25 06:29 PM
17

Braindead OP that ignores entire existence of external locus of control Grade: F
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/25 06:25 PM
0

Nope. People act like women and "FEEMALE NATUUUR" are immutable and that how women act now is how it has always been which is stupid. Literally the real solution is to get rid of all these social norms that favor women over men and artificially raise their social value. Women are where they are today because of affirmative action. Women are a lifetime net tax burden. Literally women are being subsidized on all angles by men generally yet you hear women constantly bleating about how they don't ne…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/25 08:55 AM
1

Pretty easy to screen even online...
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/25 08:57 PM
1

Misogyny like me pointing out how you are talking out your ass regarding which men are misogynistic? I'll wait for you to fully admit you are factually incorrect. But I'm sure that's misogynistic too.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/25 05:40 PM
1

Lmfao Speak for yourself dude. If you screen you can easily avoid those types.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/25 05:39 PM
1

It amazes me that adult women will talk out of their ass on a point and then when called out pretend like they were saying something else. You said: leftover men are most misogynistic and hateful. You were wrong. But yes thanks for admitting that women really do not give a shit about a man actually being misogynistic and that they'd rather choose a misogynist they find attractive and put up with that abuse by projecting his misogyny onto unattractive men.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/25 05:36 PM
2

I love how women spout off shit that is literally disconfirmed by empirical research just to hold onto to this stupid moralistic narrative. Per research benevolent sexists get the most ass followed by misogynists who distantly outpace......PROGRESSIVE NICE GUYS. And of course you dont blame women because women are mainly out to avoid blame for anything. Nope. Women actively choose violent disrespectful misogynists OVER meek, nice progressive men.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/25 09:22 AM
1

"I am not attacking women or calling them bad or promiscuous in this post" And this is why modern men fail. Here LET ME SHOW YA SOMETHING women who go on dates while still fucking their ex or who aren't emotionally available are dumb attention whores and the women who do it aren't exploring anything beyond being time wasting dumpster fires. It's only slightly less reprehensible if she reveals it to the man she's on a date with because the level of inconsideration warp bitch 10. ^ That's called h…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/25 09:13 AM
–

No you apparently don't understand English now in attempt to avoid the obvious fact that you don't know what you're talking about. Bold strategy. That is to say, hilariously fucktarded. Points for the inapt assumption of my emotional state sans any evidence; par for the femme "argument" course.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/25 09:03 AM
–

Shows up doesnt know what she's talking about so talks out of her ass Par for the PPD course
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/25 08:59 AM
0

Corrects us about hypergamy. Also has no fucking idea what hypergamy is nor the modified definition referred to. Par for the PPD course
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/25 07:19 PM
0

Modern society embraces the infernal hence women are celebrated for leading and fighting men. Bottom line: whenever a woman disrespects you you need to treat it as though satan himself appeared and proceed accordingly. Usually the answer is to just drop her.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/25 07:17 PM
1

Look bro as a man you have a choice: Either she loves you or you love her. If she loves you as in IN LOVE then she believes you are special relative to her and her life experience. If you love her you're obviously not that special to her because if you were YOU wouldn't think she was that special. Make the choice
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/25 09:43 AM
0

Lol and we realize this comment is dunderheaded "observe genetic makeup via phenotype." Doubles down on dunderheadedness by asserting that because the market is made of people it therefore is not or cannot be manipulated (lolwtf).
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/25 09:37 AM
2

Lol match sending reps on here to boost that stock value
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/25 09:25 AM
4

So young men should instead go without i.e. put up with the outrageous standards and ridiculous nonsense of their own age cohort? Another braindead OP who doesn't understand from whence this phenomenon springs
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/25 09:23 AM
0

Yeah you keep pulling factoids out of your ass to assert. Tell you what go show me research that people can easily find self satisfaction without any romantic relationship due to AN INABILITY to get into one. No bro you forget basic facts about humanity and biology.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/25 09:21 AM
1

Oh if you're arguing that human beings the social animal par excellence do not need validation to survive and thrive, then yes you are wrong.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/25 09:10 PM
3

Your question wasn't worth answering. Nurses aren't biologists so I'm comfortable standing behind my statement.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/25 09:08 PM
1

You literally just said that some kind of personal responsibility attaches to men as a result of them being brainwashed. First sentence. Yes you keep ASSERTING NONSENSE. Sorry when cultural norms are IMPOSED UPON you you CANNOT UNILATERALLY decide they do not apply to you anymore. The rare individuals who even come close are revered as near gods such as Buddha, Jesus. The fact that you truly believe you have transcended anything rather than just find or luck out into getting your needs met marks…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/25 09:04 PM
7

Same reason you and all other humans do. Sorry, the "human needs aren't real" BS is gonna be a no sell here. Learn basic human biology 😌
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/25 06:54 PM
2

Nah but that's not what I said so stop twisting my position kthx
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/25 06:34 PM
2

That's completely false. Read what you read
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/25 06:15 PM
-1

Lol so men are personally responsible for being brainwashed and society becoming misandrist? SICK TAKE. Oh "stop letting general society and culture control you." Lmfao what a joke. NO MEN STOP CHASING VALIDATION JUST CAUSE.... REREAD MY ENTIRE COMMENT YOU DILDO Some people manage to GET THEIR NEEDS MET and others don't. You stop chasing once you get yours. You keep assuming these jedi master monk men exist. My entire point is that they don't. So you can keep peddling nonsense like an individual…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/25 06:09 PM
9

My what terrible reading comprehension you have
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/25 05:59 PM
–

You don't know your point very well then. When you agree that the main causal factor has an external locus of control i.e.a cultural trend, your conclusion that there is an internal locus of control i.e. MEN NEED TO JUST GET OVER IT LOL comes off stupid. The fact that you're talking in movie script terms i.e. OVERCOME THE SYSTEM LIKE ME BRO shows you are remarkably ignorant. Sorry dude you can't say an issue that you admit is caused by an external force is also caused by men. Make up your mind. …
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/25 04:51 PM
13

That isn't the problem. You've ignored non stop cultural messaging that predicates male worth on desirability to women You conveniently left out how female validation tends to control the validation a man gets from other men as well and the status he can attain in many groups which is thanks to women infiltrating almost all male.dominated spaces. Yeah bro "overcome the world" Hint: if you truly think you've overcome those factors rather than just being fortunate enough to get your NEEDS met thru…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/25 02:58 PM
0

The patriarchy has never been stronger lmfao. Dudes at the top have NEVER had it this good.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/25 02:23 PM
3

LMFAO Whoa so mens problems are all men's fault? SUPER HAWT TAKE DUUDE
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/25 02:13 PM
39

Stupid post acting like people don't need to be validated. The "human needs aren't real" genre of fiction needs to die
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/25 02:12 PM
-1

Text game: dumb myth that needs to die. Text to set up IRL meetups. You aren't building attraction texting her like a 13 year old girl
/r/seduction18/01/25 02:05 PM
2

Ya because she likely isn't attracted to you
/r/seduction18/01/25 02:04 PM
0

You never play a woman's game You're too scared of rejection which is why you didn't just go for it date 1 and then when or if she tried to act all prim and proper, just peace out. Guarantee you she's fucked someone in the last 6 months
/r/seduction18/01/25 02:03 PM
1

Ya in 2017 for sure. Oh. Lol 2025? Ditch dating apps theyre garbage now.
/r/seduction18/01/25 02:01 PM
-1

Lol as if any of us are fooled
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/25 08:50 PM
2

Nope. You asserted that women don't simp out over men they are really attracted to because....you asserted women wouldn't be into perverted criminals and that isn't normal....but it's actually fairly common. That != guys only hanging out with Harley Quinn That = your counter argument sucked so get a new one
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/25 08:49 PM
1

What a feminine response. What a lucky dude. Lolbtw
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/25 08:47 PM
4

Women don't have shame tho lmfao There is no ego hit. Just forever woowoo about knowing her worth
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/25 06:53 PM
2

Women literally simp for criminals all the time so idk lmfao tune into reality sometime maybe?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/25 06:37 PM
4

Yes. Women are simps/pick mes for men they actually are attracted to. Correct.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/25 05:01 PM
1

That doesn't make sense. If a woman likes a dude, he can pretty much do no wrong. In 0 way does that mean he's a simp if he just does whatever he wants.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/25 04:59 PM
2

If average men left and took their tax revenue with them that "independence" women like to stand on would suddenly be pretty shaky. Suddenly they'd really have use for a normal dude who is reliable and can help tend a home and not some dude who will blast on her tits once a month and bounce....
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/25 04:57 PM
4

Nah If a woman is into you you pretty much can't fumble. ... Which is why you should just do what you want. That's the secret
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/25 04:54 PM
-2

Lol you guys are yukking it up D. TRUMP wins 2016 Yukking it up Capitol stormed Yukking it up Roe v wade overturned Yukking it up Huge divide between young men and women Harr d harr harr D trump despite being a fucking felon LANDSLIDE RE ELECTION Here you are still yukking it up Lmfao It's gonna take you all being voted into some kind of hand maiden tale dystopia for anyone to take this shit seriously. It's starting to happen. Good luck!
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/25 04:49 PM
-2

^ such bullshit grandstanding If you know the true heart of the discussion then why waste so many posts on this faux outrage? Your position in and of itself is ridiculous. As it stands right now men pay more in taxes net positive over a lifetime. Women are a net negative. Hmm Men generally are already subsidizing women. Female independence is an illusion. The eugenics aim founders on basic bio and pop genetics 101. Hi, our current ideas of what traits are best are heavily tied to current prevail…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/25 04:46 PM
0

Men and women aren't the same. Sorry. In biblical times and polygamist times yes, exceptional men were allowed many wives. It's the same situation. Which is true between the particular man and woman. On average promiscuous men don't seem that chadly compared to average. You need to understand the only real exchange that casual encounters will happen. Often the man will dumpster dive to some degree. As in, that's the main way. Since most men are average the way most men are going to pump the numb…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/25 04:38 PM
3

It's actually about having the option. In which case, yes this applies. You don't have to exercise the option.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/25 04:25 PM
1

Once again read my first comment and learn what induction is. I believe in you.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/25 04:35 PM
1

The research i just cited indicates they cheat less. Learn basic induction.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/25 04:13 PM
3

I'm with you except you telling the women that you plan to do this like an attention whoring little mean girl. Like that served no purpose other than to piss them off.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/25 04:12 PM
1

Love is an emotion that corresponds.to actual neural pathways and brain regions, boyo. What most people confuse with love, limerance, is currently viewed as a scam but it's such a strong emption that it still.makes plenty of suckers. Romantic love and the notions surrounding it have been around much longer than 60 years. Try at least 1000 for courtly love.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/25 04:10 PM
1

Biggest correlation with infidelity in marriage is number of prior sex partners. Therefore if religiosity (good proxy for conservative) lowers partner count, then indeed they are less likely to cheat. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2933332/ https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&opi=89978449&url=https://downloads.frc.org/EF/EF13C15.pdf&ved=2ahUKEwjSkKH8yvWKAxW2SPEDHd3CKroQFnoECCwQAQ&usg=AOvVaw03zK-J7lCpHOQrlMqP3rnE Two sources right there demonstrate this. Gotta love all the …
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/25 04:06 PM
1

If it's a fun activity you shouldn't have to invest any extra effort. That's what compatibility is. If I don't like eating pussy I shouldn't start doing that just to make sure she gets off and keeps returning. Nah ill do what I like. If she doesn't like it? Peace. Best to just do your thing and find chicks who are into it rather than trying ti please everyone: which IS "beta"
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/25 03:19 PM
1

The alpha thing is not giving a fuck and just sticking with the women who really get off on your "selfish " style tbh.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/25 03:16 PM
1

Tbh most women should just err more toward starfishing... Cause a lot don't move that well and just fuck up the action. There i said it. Fight me.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/25 03:05 PM
1

Lol k tryhard
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/25 07:18 AM
1

Ya women can cum to men they aren't attracted to which is why they cum the same amount vaginally (30%) from rapists as they do from their partners. Surprise!
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/25 07:03 AM
1

LMFAO Your job is to nut lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/25 07:01 AM
1

No it isn't. A dude eating pussy isn't going to elicit the same reaction as a dude pounding her from behind even if both make her cum
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/25 07:00 AM
1

That's actually not what he said. I love how people proudly announce that they lack reading comprehension here and do it in the most Dunning Kruger ways
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/25 06:56 AM
1

It depends. I agree that going out of your way to give a woman an orgasm is lame and that ideally if you can just make her cum from penetrative sex that's the best setup. But really sex comes down to compatibility. Like if I go in and do my thing and it seems like it's gonna be frills and thrills just to make her cum, that's more like a ONS for me. Ain't nobody got time for all that shit. Women who are really into you are happy to be used sexually by you. Yeah that's right. Fight me. I had an fb…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/25 06:54 AM
1

Um no one can find you to be a rapist yes if no court convicts you of rape. If you're weak minded enough to just assume someone is a terrible person based off of finger pointing and gossip, go ahead. It's not legal minutae what the fuck? It's literally WHAT THE TERM REFERS TO: A CRIME. If one is not found guilty of a crime ONE IS NOT "ON THE SPECTRUM" of that crime. None of what your saying makes practical sense. No, sorry dude the entire society doesn't give credence to a bunch of gossip being …
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/25 06:25 PM
0

If a mistake was made then due process was not followed. Correcting an error does not negate the existence of the error, logic 101 dude
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/25 05:50 PM
0

LMFAO RAPE IS A CRIME You can't say x is a criminal when the institution responsible for conferring criminal status has failed to do so lmfao
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/25 05:46 PM
2

Do you think the prosecution proved his guilt beyond a reasonable doubt? Because sorry to say: they didn't.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/25 05:43 PM
1

THE FACT THAT EVERYONE ELSE WAS CLEARED despite tons of women coming forward should tell you something, then....
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/25 05:42 PM
1

THEY DONT NEED TO PROVE INNOCENCE LMFAO
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/25 05:41 PM
1

They don't have to be lying. Do you understand that rape is a legal conclusion? 50 women stating a legal conclusion who aren't lawyers means nothing. What are the odds that 50 women entered into circumstances they mistakenly thought were rape when they clearly weren't? Fairly high to be honest. The chick who accused aziz Ansari of SA is a great example. And there tons of accounts like that one in metoo of some woman painting NOT SA as SA.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/25 05:41 PM
2

Dude as a matter of due process: IT IS BELIEVABLE unless those witnesses can hold their own and meet evidentiary standards in court. So no bro sorry, 50 chicks running their mouths about something does not a crime make
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/25 05:38 PM
0

No you can just adopt bitch sound bytes they use when they get called out. Like literally you sound like a bitch rite now: hyuk hyuk well.u must not get any har har cuz u hurt my feefees and I can't say anything about the merits of your point ^ exactly how chicks argue. Are u a woman
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/25 03:48 PM
0

Nah what I said to you is even wiser. Women being aggressive != women either liking you or not. The first is evidence there are leaks in your approach, whereas the purpose of the original statement is that "initial attraction" is blameless and there's nothing a man does for it.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/25 03:46 PM
0

Lol says the guy who was just agreeing with me. Sorry bro it's not some sort of flex to talk about how the women rip your clothes off. Just means you have low Levels of social awareness. Unless you're still a teenager or something lmao
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/25 03:35 PM
1

Ya none of that makes sense. You see if the determination of whether she wants u has almost nothing to do with anything you can do, then no all that shit you said is meaningless. Women don't go for jerks. They go for men who they are attracted to who can then treat them like shit because see first part of sentence. You're just engaging in creative writing over there with the Johnny Wayne shit
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/25 03:33 PM
0

I read that the majority of the time, you're the woman. Sikk skills hi-value mang
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/25 03:30 PM
-1

Posturing like this is max soy. It's not alfalfa or cool to declare that you're such a passive pussy that all your casual encounters consist of female aggression. Max soy because women are still scatterbrained, cowardly, timewasters so all this means is that you spent 30 mins hanging out with a chick before she finally had to be the man rather than you figuring out she wanted to fuck after 2 minutes and you being the man. Waiting for women to do everything is ILLUMENATI SYMBOL brah
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/25 12:54 PM
1

Look at you trying to equate meaningless profundity posturing like "it depends," with nuance. So in addition to knowing dick all about discussion or the definitions of words you use, what other ways are you a conversational failure?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/25 12:51 PM
1

Yeah it's like you just don't seem to understand an external locus of control.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/25 12:39 PM
0

Yeah crazy things can happen if you make shit up about how attraction works. For example contriving a scenario where the dude must get desperate.and this desperation drives people away. Lmao you pppll can't help but just world hypothesis your way out of everything. How about women or men don't have. Walking "desperation" detectors and their judgments of such are mostly the result of the halo or horn effect? What if those personality traits have dick all to do with dating results? Yannow...like w…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/25 12:38 PM
0

Um your comment is bad science and bad logic. 99.9999% of all relationships don't last. Dumb point. His strategy is effective because if he raised his standards those 2 relationships would be 0. Are you daft?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/25 12:35 PM
1

Lmfao bro this isn't jedi wizard school it's real life. You can master all the impulses you want either you get picked by the opposite sex or you don't. The ones who are powerless are the ones with the least amount of CHOICE.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/25 12:33 PM
2

Precisely 0 of those dicussions have "it depends" in them.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/25 12:31 PM
–

They exist and are used by dipshits who aren't smart enough or brave enough to take an actual position and be held to their words. The purpose of discussion is to unearth information. The shit you want to say doesn't do that or aid in that. Damn I hate these attention seeking obfuscators
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/25 12:31 PM
4

Ding ding ding ding WOMEN EITHER LIKE YOU OR DO NOT and know within maybe a minute or two It's all based on superficial bullshit Which is why the best course of action with women is to just escalate. If she acts all weird and proper she's not into you. They aren't complicated Jesus christ
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/25 12:28 PM
1

I love how people repeat these old adage about women being less visual blah blah when so many peer reviewed studies have destroyed this stupid canard and revealed that if anything women ARE EVEN MORE VISUAL AND SUPERFICIAL
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/25 12:26 PM
2

women aren't starving. They're also ignoring a ton of food DUE TO ARBITRARY NONSENSICAL "STANDARDZ." for example, the super chubby woman who can only be attracted to super fit men (far more common than you'd think). That woman has insecurities she is too lazy to resolve via effort of exercise and so opens her legs to resolve. Bottom line: female dating standards have way more to do with their personal bullshit than the nuts and bolts of fucking. So no that analogy is fucktarded. The woman has al…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/25 03:46 PM
–

Lmfao what a great window into the freakazoid th0t process of modern women
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/25 03:39 PM
1

I love how people who have no clue about biology write these fantastical tales about how it all works. Go read a 101 bio text. Understand that most of the evo psych jive from the red pill is just that: jive. The dynamics regarding women and hypergamy and blah blah has much more to do with the casual slow rise of social misandry and devaluation of men than it does much else
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/25 03:37 PM
1

Women aren't good at assessing character. This bullshit needs to die. Alpha means essentially the male in charge of other males in the group. In which case no alpha males aren't rare at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/25 03:34 PM
1

Generally speaking women are much less empathetic than men. Women are in group tribalism specialists who exclude and relationaly aggress with such caprice and superficiality. The way women interact with men they at minimum fail to find attractive, should demonstrate to anyone with eyes the lack of empathy women generally have.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/25 03:32 PM
3

You literally wrote a bunch of irrelevant gibberish then. And we can agree to disagree. You believe women routinely feel true intense sexual attraction and fail to act on it for long periods of time. I disagree.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/25 05:01 PM
4

Yeah I understand you wish I said something I didn't say. But I didn't say any of that. Once again: if she says no she's not particularly sexually attracted to you.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/25 03:49 PM
4

Lmfao Another OP in "not how this fucking works" land. Bottom line: When a woman is sexually attracted to a man she will fuck him and fuck him soon. Whether she's dating for marriage ONS or LTR...doesn't matter Literally all the man has to do is create the opportunity for sex to happen i.e. have a place to fuck.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/25 12:55 PM
1

Idk sex and romantic companionship are human needs. Tbh pretending that people especially men can be just chill not having sex and not having romantic attention is fucking dumb and misanthropic. It's more man hating than assigning a man's worth based on sex. Like you can't escape being human. Humans fuck. That's how the species perpetuates.
/r/MensRights01/01/25 02:37 PM
1

I suggest you start with basic social interaction and red herrings and derailing. Because you are failing at all 3. I understand you have nothing to add to my original correct comment. You are forgiven.
/r/MensRights01/01/25 02:30 PM
3

It's not derailing if let's say about 5% of men are rapist abusers yet let's say manage to soak up outsize reproductive choice and essentially are chosen by women constantly. In that type of situation i.e. reality when women point out the "problem." It's not just abusive evil men who are the problem. Not only that but when women refer to THE PROBLEM as an excuse for engaging in all manner of shitty rude disrespectful behaviors from ghosting to outright deception "bcuz my trauma," once again it's…
/r/MensRights30/12/24 03:38 PM
5

This isn't really a study and the journal seems non mainstream. There's no meta-analysis or data collection. Kind of reads like an editorial. Having said that I largely agree with its contentions.
/r/MensRights30/12/24 03:34 PM
1

I'm describing patriarchy as is commonly understood. The fact that you believe one has to offer an extensive treatise on every facet of an ideology to refer to it is your pedantic posturing problem not mine. You think too much in head up your own assism. For example, all the nonsense you stated about America is patently false. Go read a few books that are more academic and less manosphere and we can talk maybe.
/r/MensRights30/12/24 03:15 PM
1

I am 100% certain you do not understand what patriarchy actually is. Once again, you just perfectly described patriarchy. You groom women to be trophies and have them respond to a top down standard of hegemonic masculinity with the chief end being control over the vast majority of the male populous for labor.
/r/MensRights29/12/24 11:15 AM
0

Um ok. Patriarchy all the same.
/r/MensRights28/12/24 06:06 PM
-2

They're not exactly wrong. Women enforcing hegemonic masculinity are indeed enacting patriarchy. The issue is that women can't or won't ever take responsibility for enforcing and upholding patriarchy (which IMO they do so more than men these days). And that women seem to believe that patriarchy offers them 0 privileges, which is nonsense. The fact that women are valued qua women and don't have to earn femininity i.e. have essentially 0 social burden is one such way. Meanwhile they try to camoufl…
/r/MensRights24/12/24 12:05 PM
1

You don't know how to answer one it seems. Once again ARE YOU ARGUING THAT WOMEN DO NOT EVER LEAD MEN ON IN THIS WAY?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/24 03:35 PM
1

Once again are you saying that women do not lead men on and imply that nice gestures etc will be "rewarded?" Are you saying this does not happen?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/24 01:45 PM
1

women leading men on is a concept that exists and that women engage in 24/7. If you can't acknowledge reality stop talking about it
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/24 09:52 AM
1

There aren't plenty of people who aren't shallow so whoever told you that is full of shit.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/24 09:12 AM
1

The friend zone does exist. It's called when a woman doesn't want to fuck a man. When women lead men on and let them do nice things for them then turn around and act like quid pro quo can never ever exist in this arena, they're just being assholes. And this whole OP is a good example of deliberately missing many points to paint one gender as bad.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/24 09:08 AM
7

Nope. Dumb dumb dumb. Women LARP and project personality traits onto men as a function of how attracted to them they are. Has almost 0 to do with any stable personality trait of the man.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/24 09:05 AM
–

Not really. Not all men can reach high enough levels of sexyal attraction to avoid having to pay for it in one way or another. Someone who has done all they could to max themselves and has accepted reality...? No shame IMHO.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/24 01:16 PM
1

Women on the whole can't have as much casual sex as men generally because as we know, musical chairs and whatnot. So they likely have more :)
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/24 01:07 AM
1

No one generalize behavior to the entire opposite gender, that's why it's called a GENERALIZATION. I swear people have to make shit up to argue with
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/24 01:04 AM
5

Yeah bro sick argument. "Just because Jack went on a killing spree doesn't mean he was lying when he said that he's not violent and believes all life is sacred." Behaving in contradiction of your statements is literally one of the biggest way to negate your statements in EVERY OTHER WALK OF LIFE. Grade: D-
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/24 01:02 AM
0

Fuck no.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/24 01:00 AM
–

women way overplay their supposed dislike of dick pics solicited or no.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/24 01:43 AM
1

Ya bro there's no point complaining about anything if that's how it currently is. What a real social policy wonk OP is.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/24 01:42 AM
–

Men have solved this: It's either your looks your height your race your money or your status. There are no other variables.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/24 01:40 AM
1

Yes this is why there is one method to deal with women: silence and ghost protocol. Arguing with women is stupid. Women do and say disrespectful shit all the time. It's on you to vote with your feet. Arguing about it let's them think they can get away with it.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/24 01:38 AM
–

Who cares?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/24 01:37 AM
1

What a knee slapper....bunch of Karens unaware of their privilege whining about not having ENOUGH privilege
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/24 01:32 AM
1

I love how people come here and tell us what patriarchy is and act like they said something. YUP. THATS THE SYSTEM BUDDY BOYO
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/24 01:20 AM
2

That really isn't true.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/24 01:37 AM
1

Ew research disagrees.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/24 01:35 AM
3

Lmfao wtf do women honestly believe a guy wants to receive as a prize some rode hard and put away wet strong womyn who "knows what she wants" Like she hasn't made a compelling anything Jesus christ. Clown world. And lmfao Any guy in 2024 MUCH RATHER BE THE SECOND GUY
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/24 02:11 AM
1

And hostile sexism still >>>>>>>> male feminist "good guy"
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/24 02:07 AM
1

Bruh typed out a bullet point paragraph of vague subjective terms and seriously calls it basic work. No MORE BASIC WORK FOR BASIC BITCHE$ I SAY
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/24 02:07 AM
1

Asshats like this exist in many alt communities such as "swingers" and the like...
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/24 02:06 AM
1

How bout NO. How about we're done taking a look through another set of eyes that seem more hostile when they look at us each time we peer through them? How about women can open their mouths ans communicate directly?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/24 02:04 AM
1

While I agree with you that any man worth his salt should resist any effort by a woman to hold him to some nonsense standard of masculinity... ...the not opening up thing is for your protection. You're forgetting worse things can happen besides her losing a little attraction. A lot of women like to pump men for information to use against them later. The reality of being a man is that the world is constantly searching for your weakness so that it can bring you down.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/09/24 09:34 PM
2

It isn't high intelligence. Here's the code: Smart woman = learns the world and status Smart man = learns abstracts ideals etc. Hate it love it don't really give a shit. It's not intelligence it's primary or secondary psychopathy and current social norms currently camouflage and mask it quite well in women which is why they recently came out with a study suggesting male and female psychopaths are actually probably equal in number. IMO it's just a case of individuals recognizing the power they wi…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/24 12:36 PM
0

Lol
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/24 12:31 PM
0

I feel the need to speak truth. You feel the need to tell lies. I'm sorry I'm not one for goddess worship bruv
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/24 12:31 PM
0

100%
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/24 12:30 PM
0

100% no you haven't you just likely were finessed so hard you didn't even realize
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/24 12:29 PM
1

Exceptions prove the rule.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/24 12:28 PM
0

Yeah bro restoring the traditional family would create mindless corporate drones...unlike the blue sky utopian labor force of today
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/24 05:38 AM
1

Totally wrong Smart women are extremely religious they just pray at the altar of social status the almighty.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/24 05:37 AM
0

Yeah and smart women who are sluts are literally some of the shittiest human beings you will encounter.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/24 05:36 AM
1

Women aren't ahead of shit. They engage in and exploit the paradigm when convenient for them. They will submit and play that role for men who unsurprisingly fit the hegemonic masculinity mould while talking a lot of that Femme shit to everyone else. use your head
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/24 05:35 AM
1

Neither theory. Look man there are some truths in life... And the fact that true blue sluts are some of if not the worst people you'll meet is one of them. Trash is trash. Ignore at your peril
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/24 05:33 AM
–

Buddy boyo women increasingly are being taught to take more charge in their relationships. What this looks like: either cucking someone openly or surreptitiously who serves the function of emotional support/bf With a social order/superficial "reel man" or two who she sluts out for. You want the future look no further than the lifestyle/swingers. It's a bunch of dudes in denial about their wives openly fucking dudes they deem superior to their husbands.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/24 05:30 AM
3

You will learn this truth if you go far enough with women my boyo: They have no ability to see beyond the social order. Which includes gender roles (for you)
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/24 05:26 AM
-1

Nah. Women are very much increasingly hiveminded. Height Race Looks Status/wealth In that order
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/24 05:24 AM
8

Bi women are hands down some of the worst toxic narc women around. They're also low key hyper enforcers of gender norms.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/24 05:23 AM
1

This assumes that the concept of neuroticism on a psychological inventory captures neuroticism. Let's assume it does. And the correlation between first impression judgments of personality and reality is near 0. Even over time it's not very good. So yeah sure people can be right but mostly by coincidence, not the accuracy of their heuristics...which mostly devolve to halo and horn effects
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/24 09:16 AM
1

LMFAO Buddy boyo you're self selecting a group of women who don't mind fucking a guy without commitment for extended periods. Higher sociosexuality off the bat.... They don't need to whore out to just fuck another guy from time to time. Your observation has some rose tinted glasses homie. But sure ur the king kong alfalfa maleZ
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/24 01:53 AM
15

All personality judgments are subjective and dependent mainly on traits that have nothing to do with behavior.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/24 12:37 AM
1

Randomly hooking up is random != meeting up at regular times to hookup and hang out at someone's place. LOL Girls who have any kind of desire toward u can and will fuck other men The hubris and downfall of any man is thinking shit that happens to others xant happen to him lol
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/24 12:36 AM
1

Lol you're essentially everyone's bf rn except they're free to fuck other guys. Taking girls out and shit wtf lol Casually dating = we meet up have some laffs and fuck
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/24 11:38 PM
1

I mean you have to really get good at escalation and initiation to really understand why a guy would more or less hate when women initiate. The feeling when a new prospect comes on the radar https://youtu.be/wIxeOvClzR4?si=rcnBuxImOipIrKKV
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/24 11:25 PM
0

Game theory ignores the spread of the women-led dating and its distribution. A small number of men will be getting inundated with offers. And they will (this is already becoming) become hegemonic masculinity to where having to initiate a date = not masculine. Plenty of men will abide by the new rules
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/24 11:23 PM
5

This is dumb. The vast majority of men will simply drop off the face of social romantic earth waiting around. When women approach you, even aggressively, their move is just the opener and show of interest. Guess what hoss, the rest of the initiative falls on you to take. Starting at the opposite 20 yard line is much better than starting at your 10.....but making moves in the endzone is still a skill. Personally, the modern advice for men to be passive and that if she wants to she would, while de…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/24 11:17 PM
5

This is such a dumb OP. The bluepill adherents have the most success dating, why? For the same reason the pope is catholic. People who have the requisite innate/passive/inert mate value to succeed can afford bluepill beliefs no matter how erroneous because they won't ever suffer to large enough extent to examine their worldview.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/24 11:11 PM
2

People largely agree on who is attractive so the first analogy is suspect. Second point is just a bootstraps/man up remix. Pretty uncompelling stuff and fails to clarify how the OP quote isn't nonsense
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/24 08:20 PM
3

Acceptance is the benchmark of social "acumen." Your view is correct. Social skill is a nonsensical concept that merely involves respecting dominance hierarchies (the vast majority of which are not based on any merit and require you to hide your gifts so as not to outshine your "betters").
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/24 05:24 PM
1

The notion of social skills (lying, construction of a facade to respect dominance hierarchies) is overcomplicated Women have higher passive social value and credit and therefore more attention and more general deference. Which trains them well in the art of exploitation and manipulation. Women are much better than men at the core of social skill: deceptive manipulation or exploitation. They practice these skills all the time. Social norms insulate them i.e. "omg he thinks I like him but I'm bein…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/24 05:19 PM
1

Edit your conniption fit to a cognizable point
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/24 08:15 AM
2

Gobbledygook woowoo jive speak
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/24 05:39 AM
0

If women weren't.....the world would ne a better place. Hahaha. Heyoooo. Misogynists in da house! Women aren't attracted to those qualities anyway. They like status first and above all else because it's as close an approximation to raw violence as you can get. The good news is that many of the traits that confer status are meaningless objectively and entirely cultural which means the pussy can be and has historically been hacked. The bad news is that you the individual....short of going genghis …
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/24 06:30 AM
1

Except it doesn't. They fuck with the stack hard it's not just merit based ELO. When tinder first arrived buddy boyo...twas a joyous time. Hot babes were on dates with normal dudes....at least the first summer. Having said that yes....dating apps have helped put an end to social gaslighting about the superficiality of dating and how interconnected it is with other social prejudices like racism and classism and heightism etc. Spoiler: THEY ARE UNITY
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/24 04:53 AM
10

Women bullshit themselves and one another regarding their petty motivations for most everything....including tbis
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/24 04:50 AM
0

Lol I pulled a milf cashier from the grocery store not too long ago. I'd seen her several times over the years and just noticed she always remembered me and was glad to see me. And then a slow but horny Tuesday struck and BOOM. Women are everywhere brah. They can be activated at any time
/r/seduction20/07/24 03:11 PM
3

Ultimately the shared activity stuff is a dead end and a crutch. You need to learn how to present intrinsic value such that people want to be around YOU.
/r/seduction20/07/24 03:09 PM
1

This is true but not in the way you think. Making long term monetary investments is necessary and will beat short term expenditures. For example cutting ur face, breaking your legs will make your dating outlay much less $$ intensive
/r/seduction20/07/24 03:07 PM
1

Bullshit excuses. I feel like Alec Baldwin in GGGR I COULD GO TO YOUR GROCERY STORE TONITE, TAKE HOME THE CASHIER. If not the young one then def the milf 😎
/r/seduction20/07/24 02:38 PM
2

Is this supposed to be some kind of reducto counter hypothetical or something?
/r/seduction20/07/24 02:36 PM
4

The real test of whether your self work means shit is if it produces better cold approach results
/r/seduction20/07/24 02:11 PM
1

Buddy you need to learn how to become proficient at cold approach. Then you can literally build and shape social circles to your whim.
/r/seduction20/07/24 02:11 PM
8

Yeah the issue with this is that without the ability to generate fresh leads yourself solo (that's the skill people at the epicenter of circles have oft times) you're forever stuck playing gay girlie status jockeying games. Thinking too much about your behavior and status within a group is in and of itself a marker of lower status.
/r/seduction20/07/24 02:10 PM
0

Cold approach isn't but lol The ability to strut into a bar and reliably pull translates to much easier social circle dominance For example I get auto high status in most any social group I'm in because I have the ability to talk to strangers and pull in new people.
/r/seduction20/07/24 02:07 PM
2

Lol so get bitter! So much advice about being non reactive is such bullshit. Live your authentic self Call a chick a stupid bitch who rejects you Say she's a lesbian Grab your cock and go YER LOSS HEIFER You'll be surprised what u can get away with. Just make sure u promptly leave after the parting shot. Chicks aren't owed your politeness or coolness when ur the one shouldering 100% social risk. Fuck that simp shit. Point being OVER TIME always being true to yourself and how you feel and you'll …
/r/seduction20/07/24 02:05 PM
1

Lol bro UNDERSTAND that an interaction is two sided If a chick is digging u the interaction will have flow. If she doesn't it won't. Has so little to do with you. Your job is to initiate, isolate, and escalate.
/r/seduction20/07/24 02:00 PM
10

STOP TRYING TO MAKE WOMEN WHO DONT LIKE U LIKE U Screen harder before ur on the date for attraction
/r/seduction20/07/24 01:58 PM
-11

Unless you were fucking these women on the regular I'm not sure why you think you're attracting shit
/r/seduction20/07/24 01:58 PM
1

This forum and mainstream society generally has a problem with accepting how superficial and stupid people are. Blackpillers unfortunately can't accept that there is no God or truth or merit to it all. I.e. these indicators like "looks," are not based in hard wired biology. They are based in power structures and historical oppression.
/r/seduction15/07/24 08:22 PM
0

Therapy is stupid and only worthwhile for women. Because it does not and never will produce any predictable systematic results. Women love it because they have no social obligations and so it just provides a nice story to accompany their life floating. Deep down you know the truth already
/r/seduction15/07/24 08:11 PM
0

Psychhack is just another shill repeating the same false talking points based on (and it is to be redundant) bad Evo psych we've heard for years. THE OP simply does not know what it does not know. For example a woman could start out liking you at a 10 but there are expectations that attach to any man she likes this much. The more your behavior buttresses or deviates from those conditions can very much have an impact on the journey to bed.
/r/seduction15/07/24 08:05 PM
-1

incompetent to the point that one can't understand that bringing a trait up as a dissembling tactic makes it an insult via context. You insult me by engaging with me at all because it indicates you actually think you have the mental chops to exert any effect. Very degrading lol
/r/seduction15/07/24 07:57 PM
1

Indeed a reddit profile. On reddit. where u more or less regurgitate mainstream narratives on dating and romance. We're all convinced. fucktard#poseur
/r/seduction15/07/24 07:56 PM
0

Lol the insults make less and less sense as the interolocutors realize how outclassed mentally they are.
/r/seduction15/07/24 07:55 PM
1

go research actual history then recognize why the examples you put up with were cartoons spun out of popular imagination rather than history
/r/seduction15/07/24 07:54 PM
-1

idk who u expect to believe any of that about u. A bitch who can't talk points and backbites is just a bitch. Cowards who need group approval and programming to engage with reality (i.e. u can't discuss only able to use mean girl tactics) are stockholm syndrome simps. My heart goes to u brother
/r/seduction15/07/24 05:45 PM
0

You're desperate as fuck slinging anything now. You can't speak like a man look at this churlish neener speak. Lol what a bitch talking about upper case. Anything but the topic at hand eh fucktard? Keep cycling thru the coward group think playbook
/r/seduction15/07/24 05:34 PM
-1

Dumbfuck, the fact that you have no real points on the merits but smears, jeers, and desperate attempts to appear as tho u have any idea of what a real man is proves my point. U are a wet pussy. Do u like being only able to repeat group think? Being a coward group think dick sucker must be a scary strange life
/r/seduction15/07/24 05:31 PM
1

Lol@this simpbot cycling thru "fucktard.exe" I understand masculinity offends and frightens you which is why you feel u must mock and contain it
/r/seduction15/07/24 05:23 PM
-2

lol I love these conformity tools riding in here flinging out names, misinterpreting the post, needing to make me evil 😈 Do u like being a social robot programmed by women??
/r/seduction15/07/24 05:21 PM
1

They aren't: they aren't smart enough nor able to resist social pressure.... Yeah bro cycle thru ur programmed talking points to eliminate dangerous thoughts Call incel, mention mental health....mm...idk go such each other off i guess?
/r/seduction15/07/24 05:20 PM
0

Do u even understand how to discuss? Ur over here labeling me because u can't talk man to man so ur over here calling me names. Do u like being a simp fucktard?
/r/seduction15/07/24 05:18 PM
1

Yes if ur getting laid by learning how to take more shit....ur just simping
/r/seduction15/07/24 05:16 PM
1

Are you under the impression that slapping the name of a real person onto a fictitious narrative makes that narrative true?
/r/seduction15/07/24 05:12 PM
15

This lame "I don't go for the girls" coping is so fucking retarded. So much advice given to men involves LYING to appease women. Every single time I've gone to a club it was abundantly clear I was there to pull ass. Guess what? I pulled ass. And I didn't waste time doing dumb shit I had to pretend to enjoy so as not to oh no seem fake. ... Buddy you want success then you need to learn reality. Women are risk averse entitled crybabies that society has placed a collective mario star around so ever…
/r/seduction14/07/24 02:57 PM
-1

Sure bro www. Learn the basics of a topic before talking out your ass about it/I'm not your fucking research assistant.dumbfuck.tool
/r/seduction14/07/24 02:45 PM
1

You showed fictional stories that were fictional stories and confused them with real history.
/r/seduction14/07/24 02:44 PM
1

NOTICE HOW ALL THINGS RELATED TO ACTUAL APPLICATION OF THIS STUPID FUCKTARDED FAKE BEHAVIOR ALL ARE VAGUE AND MEANINGLESS AS WELL. BECAUSE ITS FUCKING STUPID AND LEADS TO YOU COMING OFF LIKE A BOOTY BUTT MAN PUSSY LOSER (Typed this upper case on purpose to illustrate that REACTING is in control because u already know how simp/responder/fucktards discuss....they suck the dick of social norms to exclusion of all else. Notice how these fucktards all jumped on the upper case and none of them respond…
/r/seduction14/07/24 02:43 PM
-3

Wasting time to pretend as though you know how to argue anything on the merits rather than bleat simp pussy talking points and flaccid wristed insults is what's wild, hoe.
/r/seduction14/07/24 02:42 PM
1

Um just because a failure occurred does not necessarily mean that the strategy or execution of that strategy was flawed.
/r/seduction14/07/24 10:34 AM
1

So you toss at me historical examples that reveal you never studied history passed kindergarten moral paragon level.... Like Jesus christ this is what happens...
/r/seduction14/07/24 10:33 AM
1

Yeah the entire body of research showing the link between empathy AFAIK all types and lower power. Before you desperately claim to an obtuse lack of basic inductive reasoning... Empathy of all kinds is a consideration of others that occurs before anything else. A baseline first received communication. Responding requires taking this information and analyzing it in an attempt to produce the most manipulative/persuasive/powerful response. High status/power individuals per research attributes are e…
/r/seduction14/07/24 10:27 AM
-1

Yes. A non reactive man used to be known rightfully as a pussy Look at the other commenters in thread with their passive aggressive caterwauling
/r/seduction14/07/24 02:27 AM
-1

Based off what? The real world research backed propositions in the OP?
/r/seduction14/07/24 02:26 AM
-6

It's so funny how envy reveals itself
/r/seduction14/07/24 02:26 AM
-7

How, exactly :) Because nothing in the post remotely relates to anything in incel ideology. Maybe you should read a fucking book or peer reviewed study regarding how people with status actually behave Sure bro Donald Trump is out there responding and non reacting lol
/r/seduction14/07/24 02:25 AM
1

It's not ad hominem to denote the actual structure of your paragraph. It's a fable preaching about the complexities of human interaction without nary a scholarly source. The counter point increasingly seems to be do you even know what an argument is?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/24 02:29 PM
1

What you wrote about human interaction full of unsourced ipse dixit nonsense certainly was a fable tho. Nice three card Monte tho Lol not really tool
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/24 12:47 AM
0

Yeah bro congrats on being hot. It's only the first step Attention ain't interest. What you got are a lot of timewasters looking to use u to boost their egos. Embrace your masculine role to bring order to the chaos. JUST FUCKING SAY IT As soon as a chick saunters onto the radar ask her out. Any answer but yes and she can fuck off. Escalate the same way. You can literally ask each thing. It's not hard.
/r/seduction13/07/24 12:46 AM
1

Asserting a nonsourced fable about human interaction isn't a point.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/24 08:31 PM
0

No I don't need someone to tell me how to think. You do.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/24 07:50 PM
1

When actual human interaction is studied we find that no, neither men or women are complicated. The stories we tell ourselves are, though. Run along now woowoo boy
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/24 07:49 PM
0

Look this is a pentagon binder of nebulous stuff. How to know where you stand? MAKE A FUCKING MOVE PUSSY. NON AMBIGUOUS IN HER FUCKING FACE Straight up ask if you're new to this.
/r/seduction12/07/24 06:26 PM
1

Nope. There's an entire cultural apparatus that also just favors women: planning and approach are on the guys shoulders. Women are in the evaluator role for everything from conversation to sex performance via cultural fiat regardless of how ridiculous it is. Women take full advantage by mocking men for doing and attempting things they could never do and playing games with men purposefully flaking etc turning dating into a humiliation ritual (not even Chad is spared this). Has little to do with m…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/24 09:30 PM
1

Yes men generally also have no empathy for men.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/24 09:28 PM
-1

Ya generally a woman's boundaries are mostly a function of how attracted to/how beneath you she feels. In fact if you fail to treat a woman sufficiently beneath you like a cum dumpster, ngl, she will over time become less into you....because that raises her up. And not in a good way. Women will complain on the one hand about how bad men are at sex but on the other hand if they are way into you they very much expect to be used. It's the fucking most diabolical shit and seems fantasy until you exp…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/24 09:26 PM
1

Double dumb dumb bonus for the recommendation to prove how weird correct truthful thinking is: Tell a random socially programmed idiot your thoughts and listen to their canned programmed refutations/gaslights....see ur wrong after all! Tool
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/24 06:05 PM
13

Stupid post that ignores how society functions. Women are trophies to win under patriarchy. And despite all the chatter, under feminism the same dudes who were on top before are still on top now: men who adhere to hegemonic masculinity the best. And if anything it has gotten even worse and more winner take all. Women are still irrationally hypergamous and take full advantage of all the social privilege that flows from this dictate of patriarchy i.e. being passive and not being held accountable f…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/24 06:04 PM
1

I did, actually. You're just not smart enough to understand it. :)
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/24 02:39 PM
1

No it is because they are considered/deemed good looking.
/r/seduction09/07/24 09:38 PM
1

Ya stop believing stupid shit like this makes a difference
/r/seduction09/07/24 06:17 AM
1

You can not pay for a goddammned thing until that chick has been sucking and fucking you like you're the only one for a few months. And lmao bro don't take chicks out until they're legit ur gf. Ur giving ur power away
/r/seduction09/07/24 06:16 AM
2

Lol women have rly fooled men these days into thinking they aren't gutter sluts when the time is right Take their hoe asses to his pad duh I've fucked chicks in literal near dumps. Tru some % will leave and a larger % will vanish but a much larger % than u think will fuck. U want another gutter slut gross out experiment. Just don't wash ur cock for a few days and just start trying to hook up with chicks for a week straight: no bathing during this time. Once again the % of women who want to fuck …
/r/seduction09/07/24 06:03 AM
1

He uses it in a nonsensical MAN UP way that destroys the meaning of the word so that people can pretend vulnerability means something other than paint a big target over your ass saying "no lube for me thanks!"
/r/seduction09/07/24 05:46 AM
2

Bro. BIG MEAN MONSTER + PREY = FEAST. women are like retarded demonic imps and just enjoy pain and power
/r/seduction09/07/24 05:43 AM
1

No I made a clear statement backed by argument with evidence. You don't understand them and have resorted to posturing. It's amusing.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/24 04:24 PM
4

That doesn't matter. Those girls get wet for the same type of guy cleaning up at the club too
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/24 05:02 PM
–

Literally research showing misogynists and sexists are the ones getting laid most. Lmao
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/24 08:26 PM
1

Look at you stalling to avoid meeting the point due to ignorance
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/24 06:06 PM
1

No it becomes social injustice which you are too heavily invested in just world thinking to notice. The fact that you believe "objective value" exists in humans and that any trait we currently denote as valuable exhibits high h2, thus indicating weak selection at best, reveals that you don't know much about biology or sociology
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/24 07:25 PM
1

Yeah so string citing a bibliography fails to evidence your point. Pull quotes so I can properly inform you about the abortion that is your reading comprehension or cede the point.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/24 09:50 AM
1

Or not dying in the example of my great insecurity regarding my ability to fly off cliffs. So no insecurities don't lead you on those paths. Insecurities let you know your limits in life. Pretending there are no limits leads to continual defeat and ridicule. You don't overcome insecurity by altering your perception like a delusional dipshit. Are you a woman or something? Men overcome insecurity BY TAKING ACTION TO SHORE UP THE WEAKNESS. The incel gets surgery to improve his face. The shorty brea…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/24 09:49 AM
1

Wrong. Objective value has nothing to do with it. Women can't objectively sense shit. And if society conditions women to value black and blonde hair but not red hair, the ginger can still indeed blame society. So no your little attempt at profundity is in fact a failed one.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/24 09:34 AM
11

Chat GPT nonsense. It has not been established that relationships are transactional. And humans are animals so no, the underlying concerns wants and needs are very similar.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/24 09:32 AM
12

And gives great D
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/24 09:31 AM
13

And they'd say "I'm tall/white/trust fund baby will inherit/good looking/great lay/great body."
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/24 09:31 AM
0

Stupid post that utilizes the shame whistle "insecurity," as if insecurity per se is wrong or bad. OP seems ignorant of how biology and the animal kingdom work. Men are typically in a very real competition with other men to spread their DNA. Without a good sense of where one stands one cannot maximize one's odds. OP also fails to realize how often those hunches turn out TO BE VERY ACCURATE AND REAL. Women DO TREAT CERTAIN MEN AS SUPERIOR AND OTHERS AS INFERIOR. Worse women will never own up to i…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/24 09:29 AM
1

Guess we men are striking against all women tomorrow then.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/24 09:26 AM
1

TRP is stupid in that it ascribes a lot of behavior to hard wiring in the face of an abyss where evidence should be. TRP also essentially encourages appeasement which is bitchmade "beta" in the end.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/24 09:24 AM
–

Honestly the better is response is "women orgasm more often from rape from a random stranger and are more likely to conceive as well. Methinks the lasses would be all right pairing off with men she isn't 'attracted to.'" Aka pussies get slick for cock. Period. Female attraction is socially conditioned and regulated toward higher status groups. But biologically the facts above are the facts. Which is why female ratings of attractiveness and even their own arousal FAIL to correlate well with actua…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/24 09:23 AM
6

Dude fuck this bullshit. Women suck more each year and the PUA shillindustry just pushes this TRY HARDER bullshit. Looks dominate everything but raw variance regarding results. All efforts should be spent improving looks to the highest level first. The game plan is simple...you are escalating from moment one. And at the first no or excuse YOU FUCKING DIP. Women have no discipline or self respect in the face of someone they are actually attracted to. They are not too busy. They are not overwhelme…
/r/seduction26/06/24 06:47 AM
0

You don't Accept you don't And move on
/r/seduction26/06/24 06:43 AM
1

What she did is egregious and obvious. She's stringing one guy along for comfort and security purposes who SHE ISNT ACTUALLY ATTRACTED TO. WOMEN WILL DO THIS WITHOUT ANY FUCKS GIVEN IF YOU LET THEM in 2024 if you're waiting past like date 2 to fuck because SHE WANTS TO 99% she just isn't attracted to you and views you as some kind of emotional tampon/validation source. Get out. In this instance and almost all others women who "are ladies now" simply hunt for men they don't have high sexual attra…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/24 03:45 AM
3

Yeah but women don't mind being depressed. Them saying they're depressed is half just to get attention
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/24 06:20 AM
4

Women who are single aren't actually single. They're usually getting pumped every so often by someone using them for sex. So the de facto polygny will work out fine for them
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/24 05:56 AM
-1

Attraction is conditioned. Period. You understand that one can be conditioned to visual stimuli right?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/24 05:54 AM
-4

Attraction is conditioned, learned, and largely follows perceptions of status. Sorry boyo, mystical feefee wuv tingles don't exist
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/24 04:10 AM
1

Thats not the process I described. Pay closer attention
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/24 04:51 PM
1

Next time just go Larp at the park
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/24 04:50 PM
–

Rhodes, Simmons, and Peters (2005) found that men's facial attractiveness also predicted having more short-term sex partners than men with less attractive faces Once again just learn a tiny bit before talking out of your ass maybe?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/24 10:17 AM
1

r/thathappened
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/24 10:10 AM
–

Yeah so I already explained the issue with the blog post (not research) you cited. It's ok if you didn't understand why it's a worthless article.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/24 06:35 AM
0

You never rejected a 10/10 This is more bullshit feminization of men. The true essence of being a man is tapping into your capacity to turn another human being into a cum receptacle. The only reason most men don't or won't even acknowledge that impulse is a lack of social and personal power.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/24 06:34 AM
0

Cut up that face or accept the hoeflation dystopia
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/24 06:30 AM
0

Women never mature. They simply avoid certain situations that in the past burned them. Which means avoiding certain feelings. Which often means aiming lower i.e. staying further away from men who have power over them. But let's say you're just some 52 year old woman's type: she'll make the same stupid impulsive decisions
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/24 06:29 AM
–

Except it isn't at all for men. Please do basic Google research before spouting off "facts."
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/24 06:26 AM
3

https://youtu.be/yT5zU450QIY Owned
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/24 04:54 AM
–

Yeah that's just a sophistry laden article that plays 3 card Monte with the question asked. See a huge swath of the populous due to values decides not to engage in casual sex. Therefore that choice will produce a huge confound. However among the men who choose to engage in casual sex, anyone who thinks attractiveness won't have a high correlation with body count is simply being willfully moronic
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/24 04:50 AM
1

Yes you essentially don't believe in a world where people are excluded primarily due to factors beyond their control. Have fun in fantasyland
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/24 10:47 PM
2

You can't assert they're inaccurate simply based on the fact that the beliefs exist dumpkopf. Just world to the max. You can google for the basic facts you're ignorant of while trying to speak on the topic.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/24 10:44 PM
1

Lol no how about you research topics you talk out of your ass about instead. Google is there for the learning. Good luck tool
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/24 05:54 PM
2

Pls argue against a phantom and strawman because you can't discuss it def makes you worth taking seriously
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/24 05:53 PM
3

You are assuming the beliefs are inaccurate with reference only to the fact that the beliefs are negative as evidence. And no it isn't Mental illness is absent in hunter gatherer societies.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/24 04:55 PM
6

Yeah to presume someone is too stupid to form their own relatively accurate beliefs about where they stand in their society when we are the social animal par excellence is irrational. Your only evidence is the bad belief for why it must be faulty which is stupid
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/24 04:54 PM
2

And those beliefs primarily arise via external feedback. Yeah bro humans have all these faulty mental perceptions which is why mental illness is pretty much absent in hunter gatherers but an epidemic in civilized societies. I've discovered that you're just another tool
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/24 04:53 PM
1

If a consistent bias is found among several populations that informs you about a system of power dumpkopf
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/24 04:51 PM
2

Women have endless options and women like this have been burned so they are LOOKING FOR SOMEONE TO CONTROL. It's a fine strategy. She will probably get what she wants thanks to current cultural programming. As a man you have 1 move and 1 move only left: walking away once a woman reveals herself to be like this one.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/24 02:07 PM
14

A woman being a woman is a sure way to attract "the worst type of men." Lol
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/24 02:05 PM
5

Wrong. This "prosocial" mimicking nonsense is stupid. The truth is that once you control for physical attractiveness, personality: dark triad or no, simply IS IRRELEVANT for mating decisions. Dark triad individuals simply are better at identifying good "marks," so to speak. So they are able to maximize the opportunities they have.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/24 02:04 PM
1

"Overall, the largest and most consistent evaluative bias was pro-women/anti-men bias, followed by smaller but nonetheless consistent pro-upper-class/anti-lower-class biases. By contrast, we observed less consistent effects of targets’ race, no effects of targets’ age, and no consistent interactions between target-level categories" https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2022-61496-001?doi=1 Sure dude, completely absurd. Like I said....you don't know what you're talking about.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/24 02:01 PM
1

slow clap
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/24 06:39 AM
2

This is so stupid how are people still uttering this garbage in 2024.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/24 06:32 AM
–

The dual mating strategy doesn't have a biological basis. Women definitely categorize men as provider vs lover. It's a cultural phenomenon.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/24 06:11 AM
1

Self improvement is the only way. Mainstream self improvement is stupid and worse than therapy. Good self improvement: Short? Break your fucking legs boyo. Ugly? Cut that face up freak. Weak? Needle to the glutes, sissy. Aka WHATEVER IT TAKES
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/24 06:08 AM
2

I personally saw a 5'3 126 lb dude put up 280 x 5 on the bench. No dude. Almost all men are stronger than all women: https://images.app.goo.gl/Y2i2fCPXCZdxnbuG7
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/24 06:02 AM
–

Women are insanely superficial which is why they are easy to abuse, scam, dupe, and fool ....news at 11
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/24 05:55 AM
1

One points out a definitional error. The second points out a basic fact supported by at least one peer reviewed study within the last year. The third is another fact of biology. The fourth points to you not knowing much about the philosophy you argue against. So no. Just facts. Go look them up. Do basic homework at least.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/24 05:53 AM
2

Nice try. This assumes that talk therapy has any bearing on one getting better results from this society. It also assumes that a problem that is 1% my fault and 99% the culture's is meaningfully addressed by the 1% I COULD DO TO BE ALL I CAN BE. I'm sorry that the real world of external causes exists and causes you great pain.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/24 05:50 AM
10

And women have no social burden of performance so of course they swear by it
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/24 03:01 AM
6

The assumption being something must be wrong with the patient. How dumb is this society? Seriously daft morons all around. Millions upon millions suffering and yokels go HERP DERP got lots of defects in dis here GREAT SOCIETY.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/24 02:58 AM
24

No. Talk therapy is moronic. The issues that plague you are real. Changing "your outlook" is just lying to yourself. Evolution honed your instincts including those for insecurity and anxiety. If you feel invisible you fucking are. And you know why be it height face race or something else entirely. Work toward fixing the problem not talking in circles to pay some circlejerker to be your friend.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/24 02:56 AM
1

OP doesn't know what misogyny is. OP also is unaware of the fact that misandry/anti-male bias is prevalent and has overtaken both race and class. OP uses imbecilic phrases like "blame women for your lack of romantic success," in a shaming context despite biologically this being 100% the truth in any species where female choice is the dominant mode of mate selection. Because OP is a just worlder pushing just worldy bullshit. When OP is ready to confront actual facts and data regarding female beha…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/24 02:52 AM
1

Men can't practice their sexuality to the fullest ever wtf nonsense is this
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/24 11:54 PM
1

Your RMV = hottest woman willing to date you but subtract one point for every major flaw i.e. -1 if stripper, -1 if single mom, -1 if high high body count etc. YOUR SMV = hottest woman willing to fuck you relatively NSA/quick
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/24 02:01 PM
1

A social group where 1. You enjoy high status 2. Among males who are themsleves high value (but don't outshine you) and 3. Has "pass around" girls as part of the core group.... ...is like a +4
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/24 01:59 PM
1

Yes which is why they are also happier in their relationships
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/24 01:57 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter