TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

ragingpineapple Archive

View 0 posts and 116 comments by ragingpineapple on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

I'm not familiar with being on the other end of the foster care system. I've been through the ringer in the courts with my own children. I've also had my niece placed with me for a little over a year back in 2008, and they did all sorts of background checks on myself, my wife, they combed over our taxes and everything, just to have sister's kid temporarily placed, but never had my own children placed in foster care. I know there's a ton of crap that's pulled in court, and I saw first hand some o…
/r/MensRights30/11/13 06:25 PM
1

So you believe that children were placed into foster care without the children's fathers being notified or otherwise considered as an alternative to being placed into foster care, made even worse by their failure to properly vet foster homes? And if I'm reading this correctly (and if my understanding of Title IV-D is correct), then that would mean parents (read: fathers) have been paying support to the state for children who should never have been placed into foster care, and certainly not into …
/r/MensRights30/11/13 05:31 PM
2

I don't see how this is specific to men's rights. Connecticut failed to perform background checks while placing children into foster care, and they're advising refunding $17mil in Federal funding. While alarming, how is this men's rights related?
/r/MensRights30/11/13 02:30 PM
2

Have a hard time believing this is serious. Sounds like an idiot fell off tumblr and landed on their own domain. From "The Feminist Experience: A Story from my life": I noticed that all of the front seats, intended for the superior class, were being occupied by old men. How dare those egotistical, patriarchal, misogynistic bastards think that they deserved a seat more than myself. I am an empowered woman, someone who realizes that I deserve to assert myself in the highest levels of society, abov…
/r/MensRights30/11/13 02:21 PM
1

You could take this in another more broad direction, tie it to how each sex does mate selection. Much of what we value in women in Western culture can be faked, since much of it is based on physical attributes. What we value in men, not so much. You can rent a nice car, live above your means for awhile, but in the long term you're not faking success or status. What we could do is value women more for their actions and not on their beings so that maybe men's attractiveness weren't so intimately t…
/r/MensRights30/11/13 01:59 PM
10

Exactly - they haven't done anything wrong Which is exactly why they should be spared from being publicly outed as having been molested. and won't lose anything by being named. Except, you know, being very publicly branded for shit that happened to them as children. I'm not one to pull the Think of the Children card, but this is a perfect example of a situation that warrants it. The guy's accused of attempting to rape a fucking baby. Scratch that, he's not just accused of it he flat-out admitted…
/r/MensRights30/11/13 01:37 PM
0

This is true. I was more just thinking aloud about how if you're an asshole and have mental health problems, if you're a man you're an asshole first, and if you're a woman you have issues first. Makes it easier to sweep men's mental health issues under the rug by attributing their behavior more to agency and not a serious condition, while also making it easier to give women a pass by removing their agency under the cover of "issues". There's certainly both men and women who have mental health pr…
/r/MensRights30/11/13 07:07 AM
1

I addressed this here: and the amount of time the child spends with each parent (which parent is positioned to supply more of the child's welfare by way of having the child more). You simply restated would I already have. If you're currently in jail it goes without saying that you cannot exercise your visitation rights, but that is not the same as saying failure to pay support is considered a material change of circumstances and grounds to affect a custody or support order. I know you want to ar…
/r/MensRights30/11/13 06:58 AM
5

Legally there is not. There's bias, there's expectations outside of the courts that creep into the courts and sway judgments, but there is not a separate law on the books that says, "Men must pay support or they cannot see their children. This rule does not apply to women." I challenge you to find a statute in any of the 50 states claiming as such. In fact, my son's mother has had to deal with child support enforcement before, spent 5? I think days in jail, over something ridiculous like $65. Sh…
/r/MensRights30/11/13 04:45 AM
1

That's not what I'm talking about. The amount of support is determined by the age and needs of the child, the ability of each parent to pay (each parent's income, or expected income), and the amount of time the child spends with each parent (which parent is positioned to supply more of the child's welfare by way of having the child more). It doesn't matter which order is put in first, support or custody. They're still separate orders, where non-payment does not constitute a material change in ci…
/r/MensRights30/11/13 04:42 AM
2

mTurk might be good for something like this. In fact, I see studies posted for what are clearly gender studies' dissertations and coursework on mTurk all the time. Maybe not a bad idea for MRAs to use the same thing to pull some statistics. Just a thought.
/r/MensRights30/11/13 04:25 AM
1

Polygraphs are junk science, so not only is she controlling but she's also an idiot as well for believing a polygraph is a valid instrument. I also find it suspicious that she's been diagnosed with Othello's, not because I don't believe it to be true, but in the grand scheme of things all of these pathological issues being blamed on conditions giving cover to assholes acting like assholes. Man controls gf, he's an asshole. Woman controls fiance, she's got a condition. 13yo black boy convicted of…
/r/MensRights30/11/13 04:20 AM
8

You can be given visitation rights even without paying support. Source: My son's mother does not pay support, she still has visitation rights. Simple as that.
/r/MensRights30/11/13 04:06 AM
4

Yeah, not sure how it's different in Canada but in the US support and custody are two separate things. This is a preventive measure against a previous widespread problem of divorced stay at home mothers being screwed out of their children because they had no income, even though they were clearly invested in their children. Now a days the support issue is taking front and center stage within men's rights because men are getting boned on the support front and the custody/visitation front, but they…
/r/MensRights30/11/13 04:01 AM
2

Obvious trolling or attempts to derail discussion need to go. It would be nice to prevent comments that are unpopular from being buried just on the basis of being unpopular. And it would be helpful to put the content of debate above the feels, since too easily unpopular opinions can be buried or removed once someone claims offense to it. Someone in that thread already suggested providing sources for claims, which is great for a lot of reasons but is also potentially problematic. "Prove it" is of…
/r/MensRights07/08/13 09:58 AM
79

Child support and custody are separate matters. Failure to pay support does not allow her to refuse contact anymore than failure to provide visitation allows your SO to avoid paying support. So you will likely have to file two motions; one motion to show cause for the failure to comply with the court ordered visitation, and one petition to modify support. Both will require you to be prepared with documentation and proof. Have them heard on separate dates. If she won't let him see the daughter, t…
/r/MensRights07/08/13 09:24 AM
1

If she wants to play hardball and threaten court orders so be it. She has to compel a court to do it, which means that she needs to explain to the court why she needs to establish paternity of a child years after the fact, and under the circumstances already puts her in a less than favorable view of the court. What sounds like is that the mother has a problem with the ex-husband and the new wife, and is thinking that maybe if she can prove he isn't the biological father that she can prevent the …
/r/MensRights07/08/13 08:40 AM
6

You know, it's shit like this that keeps me from embracing the Men's Rights Movement fully beyond posting the occasional comment or attacking misandry and oppressive feminism whenever I see it on other subreddits. That poster isn't an MRA, and that isn't an MRM site. That's like basing your view of religion on the YouTube comments for Nicki Minaj - Stupid Hoe. You could replace radical feminism in your comment with just feminism and it would be more correct. At a basic level feminists are libera…
/r/MensRights07/08/13 07:36 AM
2

The court will consider the father properly served of the order since the previous attorney was acting on his behalf. It was a failure of the previous attorney to properly inform his client (the father) of the order and provide him copies. "I didn't know" is not a valid excuse in this situation, since as far as the court is concerned the father was informed of the order... through his attorney. He can lodge complaints against the attorney, but he's still obligated to follow the order, and he's s…
/r/MensRights01/08/13 12:41 AM
2

Yes, actually it very much does, because I'm not speaking as an advocate of biology on its behalf, it does what it does no matter what you or I say on the matter. I'm saying that no matter what you or I or anyone else thinks should be, biology says "fuck you" to all of us and does its own thing regardless. We all work under those constraints, and pointing to that being the case is not advocating for or against fathers in any capacity. This is such a very basic concept it would be excruciatingly …
/r/MensRights25/07/13 10:07 PM
1

It's not so simple, because "equality" has come to mean different things during the history and evolution of women's rights groups. The feminism you're accustomed to evolved from women's lib, and paralleled the civil rights movement (or attempted to, at least, through co-opting), and was preceded by the suffrage movement, and so on down the line. At each step along the way, "equality" meant something different. It may behoove you to learn, that many women who were suffragettes were against much …
/r/MensRights25/07/13 09:03 PM
2

You don't have any kids - or I very much hope not. I very much do, and I made a comment as such earlier today. Thanks for dragging my kids into this. /s There's really nothing else to say. You're looking for a fight that isn't being presented. I've already pointed out that neither I nor 5_by_5 are making the argument that you're rallying against. There's literally nothing I can say to get you to step back and acknowledge that all your hubbub is in response to a perceived attack against fathers t…
/r/MensRights25/07/13 07:58 PM
2

Replying just so you get notified of my edits. If you want to make a small correction that will affect all future builds of Firefox, and one teeny tiny victory for us, here's your chance. Nothing major, but every little bit helps.
/r/MensRights25/07/13 07:45 PM
4

I don't know if Red Pill deserves to be up there. It's kind of a PUA/sexual take on gender and stuff. I think they try to take a more masculinist approach, but to put it on the level of the other three seems a bit of a stretch to me.
/r/MensRights25/07/13 06:06 PM
2

Aspell output in text format here. Deselect box to use their download manager (first hit that popped up for quick and dirty file host). Open, paste into text box in Firefox, note the words flagged. More Edits: Mozilla core refers to the dictionary being used as Hunspell, even though the addon page indicates Aspell. At this point I'm going to have to toss in the towel. I don't know much about Hunspell dictionaries except that they're a bit of a pain to edit since they're not just word lists. Huns…
/r/MensRights25/07/13 06:00 PM
2

It would appear "men's" disappeared from the adaptation from Aspell's word list to what Firefox is currently using, yes. There are additional edits. If I paste the word list into Firefox it's flagging words that are included in Aspell's dictionary. Edit: Not all dictionaries are affected. en_AU for example correctly displays "men's".
/r/MensRights25/07/13 05:28 PM
4

I'm not saying any of that. What I'm saying is that from a purely biological point of view, that's the way things are. I'm saying biologically speaking, nature doesn't really care whether you stick around or not during the pregnancy. It needs your sperm and that's it. It needs her uterus for the entire duration. You're having a disagreement with an argument that isn't being made, and this is the second time I'm pointing it out.
/r/MensRights25/07/13 05:20 PM
1

This is for Firefox. If your screenshot is from a different browser, then the following is not for you: Firefox's American English dictionary is supposed to be derived from Aspell, which is derived from Ispell, which is old old old. "men's" and "women's" are included in the English word list for Aspell, found here, which would suggest that whoever maintains the version used for the Firefox spell check edited the original list at some point. Maybe e-mail them? No idea who maintains the dictionary…
/r/MensRights25/07/13 05:06 PM
8

Women can choose not to go through with the pregnancy, but they can't choose to distance themselves from the pregnancy while still carrying the child to term. Once committed, they're intimately tied to the baby from conception to birth as a result of biology. The pregnancy is dependent on the woman's body. The same cannot be said of men. They can stay or leave, and it does not affect the pregnancy. The woman is more biological invested in the pregnancy, since it's 9 months out of her life. If yo…
/r/MensRights25/07/13 03:52 PM
5

The vocal self-righteous feminists, yes, but this post seems a bit circlejerky doesn't it? Would you like to discuss any of this or reaffirm what you and many here already believe? Venting? I don't know how else to respond to this. This reads like... you know when you're upset about something and you're alone, and you sort of have these long drawn out arguments with someone in your head? It's like that. I just don't know what you're looking for here. Help me out.
/r/MensRights25/07/13 02:39 PM
6

How do you prevent yourself from becoming jaded with women in general? By remaining for men, and not against women. There's nothing inherent in women to be jaded about. It's true that the times people have screwed me the worst, they were women, pulling crap no man could get away with. It's also true that I had a grandmother who saved my ass many times. If not for her, I'd of never made it through my teenage years. She saved my life in more ways than one. I have a wife who's the type of women who…
/r/MensRights25/07/13 01:48 PM
3

Sure you can, but it's not as fun ;) We can downgrade to a 6 cylinder if we wanted, but you can never upgrade to a V-10, catch my drift?
/r/MensRights25/07/13 10:54 AM
1

Jimmy taps happen. Doesn't appear to be intentionally inappropriate. Looks like he was trying to slap his knee. Would have been nice if she'd leaned over and said, "My bad. You okay?" but whatever. If this is all there is to the story, I mean it could have and should have been handled between the coach and the assistant like grown adults. I suspect there were other incidents beyond what's shown on that video. Guy was awarded 250k and I find it hard to believe you'd get that payout from something…
/r/MensRights24/07/13 08:31 AM
2

If the thread title should read, "Woman Basketball Coach Hits Assistant and Gets Fired. Assistant Is A Man.", then this might be it. If so, I don't agree with her firing unless there's something beyond this we're not seeing. Looks like the kind of typical, physical comradery that wouldn't be out of place much of anywhere.
/r/MensRights24/07/13 07:56 AM
32

There are certain issue that you face for being a man, and there are certain issues you face for being gay. Sometimes, the issues are worse because you're both, but generally we're concerned with your issues as a man, but that doesn't mean we have a problem with the latter. We don't really divide ourselves among things like orientation. If you're a man we've got your back, and if you support men's rights we're glad to have you.
/r/MensRights24/07/13 05:26 AM
1

There was a ton of re-imaging and re-branding done prior to the 70s that this article completely skips over. Many suffragettes split after the suffrage movement, and there was another significant split between the "angry, lesbian, man hating group" and what many would be considered today as equity feminists. Many 1st wavers didn't subscribe to 2nd and 3rd waves because of it. As an aside, I'd pin Sommers who coined the phrases equity and gender feminism, as being as close to 1st wave as you're l…
/r/MensRights24/07/13 04:20 AM
10

Her looks don't matter, her stance does.
/r/MensRights24/07/13 03:04 AM
14

If Zimmerman were a white female, they wouldn't be giving "her" nearly as much shit for having a gun, they wouldn't be "blaming" her for following him, and they would have applauded her for killing the big scary black man for attempting to rape her. And yes, they would have portrayed Trayvon as a man, not a child. Because the idea that men are big and violent, would have superseded even the racial circus that's inundated the case. Our dimorphism is an underlying cause for a lot of what people wo…
/r/MensRights24/07/13 01:32 AM
5

Hypo - under, lower, less Agency - the capacity to exert control or power Basically, hypoagency is the claim of being powerless or not in control of oneself or their life. An aversion to personal responsibility, if you will.
/r/MensRights24/07/13 01:13 AM
1

I don't agree with everything about him, but he was ousted for all the wrong reasons at the time. I wouldn't consider him a friend by any means, but the whole enemy of my enemy and blah blah, you know. I think it's more indicative of the kind of sway and control feminism has on academic discourse and policy, which is a very serious problem.
/r/MensRights24/07/13 01:06 AM
10

Feminism has been pushing much more for equality in outcome over equality in opportunity in 2nd and 3rd wave, and is another major ideological distinction between feminism and the MRM. Actually, that's not entirely true, is it? Since suffragettes wanted the vote without putting their ass in danger of getting killed in battle, and many women who were critical of the vote initially feared that treating women equal meant they might have to die like men. 2nd and 3rd wave just took it to a whole 'not…
/r/MensRights24/07/13 12:40 AM
8

A woman wouldn't just lie about ra... oh. And not only is she a woman, but she did it intentionally to push a feminist agenda. You know, back in the day women would lie like this and get black men killed. People need to remember that acknowledgement of intentional mob violence this crap incites when dealing with her and other false accusers. And she's quite the violent little thing herself with that firearms charge. Maybe they should have given her more than probation. A school official denounce…
/r/MensRights23/07/13 05:09 AM
5

Highly relevant example of feminist mobbing, from the very same site. I'd almost forgotten about this happening. Almost. Consider ourselves humbled to be given the same ire as the president of one of the most prestigious schools in the world?
/r/MensRights23/07/13 04:38 AM
0

And the fembots are going to bury it by burying giegerwasright's comment.
/r/MensRights23/07/13 04:14 AM
1

Certain atheist circles have a feminist problem. Ex-religious folk tend to retain certain dogmatic thought processes, and in the west atheism and feminism tend to be more heavily liberal and progressive slanting. Go look in /r/atheism and note the increasing number of gender issues come up in threads and comments. This was not the case a few years ago. Here's an AVFM article by Elam that expresses some of the same things I myself have noticed the past couple of years. I find it MORE true in the …
/r/MensRights23/07/13 02:48 AM
4

Rape by deception or coercion perhaps, but not rape in the sense most would accept it as such. That is not to say that a man cannot be raped and wind up responsible for a child he never wanted.
/r/MensRights23/07/13 02:43 AM
1

He's fortunate enough to have friends that are willing to help him out. He and his family have my best wishes.
/r/MensRights22/07/13 10:31 PM
7

They'd say, "The most dangerous job is being a woman. Checkmate, MRAs."
/r/MensRights22/07/13 10:17 PM
6

You should have equal problem with the idea that every figure in that graph is assumed guilty of being a rapist, except for the two at the bottom. Maybe someone should make an infographic about female sexual abusers. I've a feeling the disparity between "rapist" and "jailed" would be even more alarming. And I don't think there would be a single falsely accused on the graphic.
/r/MensRights22/07/13 08:10 AM
20

This article is about tricking men out of their final choice regarding being fathers or not. There isn't really an opposite angle anywhere women have the right to terminate a pregnancy. There really isn't an epidemic of embryo hijacking, either. You couldn't write an opposite piece unless you figured out how to remove eggs from a woman w/o her knowledge or consent, and then continue the pregnancy without her. It would be interesting to see such a thing play out, if the father would go after the …
/r/MensRights22/07/13 05:29 AM
6

It doesn't perpetrate rape culture unless you're using a definition that you can change at will. The name and face are currently blurred. Related: In 2008 I received some texts from an ex, who had mistakenly heard that I was single again at the time, and was drunkenly pursuing me on the phone. She and I have some bad history and I hadn't even seen her in 5+ years and was quite happy without her in my life. Anyways, she starts out with "I miss you" and after me telling her off over and over, move…
/r/MensRights22/07/13 04:07 AM
3

Expectation of privacy will generally trump any notice of recording. For example, say you give advance notice that your house is under 24/7 video surveillance, and you bring a date home. You'd have a hard time arguing that camera in the toilet was legal, since a reasonable person would still expect privacy in a bathroom, from being inadmissible in court to facing surveillance or wiretapping laws, you're potentially screwed. The same can be said for a recording made in a bedroom. Which is actuall…
/r/MensRights21/07/13 09:53 AM
1

What does 2XC have to do with this? Plus that exchange is like 10 levels deep in a thread. That's where all the stupid happens.
/r/MensRights21/07/13 07:44 AM
1

I'm tickled pink you're under the impression I viewed you as being here for me. Keep those blinders on, fella.
/r/MensRights21/07/13 05:42 AM
7

This isn't a zero-sum game. The India rape situation has been getting tons of frontpage action for months and months. We can care about more than just the women, and until I read evidence of a single instance where a man falsely accused a woman of rape, I'm going to consider false accusations a uniquely male issue, and so belongs here in this sub.
/r/MensRights21/07/13 05:39 AM
4

Psychiatric drugs are controversial not just because of their over-prescription and their side effects, but because about 90 percent of school shooters, according to Healy, were users of antidepressants, which all carry an FDA “black-box” warning of “suicidality.” Correlation... causation... Anyways, the way this is worded pisses me off with its sensationalism. Most "school shooters" are also male, and I'm still waiting for a report on the abysmal support men in particular receive as it pertains…
/r/MensRights21/07/13 05:28 AM
3

Generally bad idea to consider blanketing your home with 24/7 surveillance beyond perimeter cameras, because any recording done in an area where there's a reasonable expectation of privacy could land you, not the other person, in hot shit. This includes a bedroom with a giant sign on the door stating cameras are in use at all times. Yes, I'm serious. This applies to video recording in most jurisdictions. Audio has its own legal intricacies. Technically, she does not actually have to harm you to …
/r/MensRights21/07/13 05:03 AM
2

We don't often discuss women's issues because women already have a very large, very influential, very effective collection of groups who deal with their issues. They're well represented, their issues garner attention and support from the public, and their hot-button issues that remain are related to male on female rape, and female reproductive rights, which while we can discuss them are actually women's issues for women to own. There are other issues like wage gap and issues in the social sphere…
/r/MensRights21/07/13 04:28 AM
2

An egalitarianism effort to encompass both genders would be the obvious end goal, but until men receive the same kind of focus that feminism has brought women, it's not going to happen. Women's roles and expectations and day to day realities have changed quite a bit in a relatively short amount of time. What it means to be a woman has been opened up for women themselves to interpret. Men need these things as well. It also won't happen so long as men are the scapegoat for all the hate that groups…
/r/MensRights21/07/13 02:52 AM
1

Feminist co-opting is assumed because of your supposed concern about further division. If working together entails putting male issues on the backburner, the same way feminism has pushed aside the issue of discriminated groups to further its own agenda, then we're not interested. Feminism has done very little to support men, all the while claiming to be for equality for all. What they have done is put women's issues first, and if by chance a portion of men somewhat benefit from tackling women's …
/r/MensRights21/07/13 02:24 AM
-1

And yet not a single piece of evidence given to support that statement, which I guess does a better job of showing how the MRM feminism doesn't understand feminism the MRM Do you not see how unoriginal your argument is? Just keep claiming that MRAs don't get feminism, and maybe enough people will believe it to be true. Doesn't exactly seem like a winning strategy so far. Feminism's problem with us isn't that we don't understand it, it's that we understand very well that what it is, is wholly dif…
/r/MensRights21/07/13 01:30 AM
1

The MRM does not understand feminism, thinking at the very least feminism is a women-only equality movement, and is reacting to a phantom of feminism by creating a men-only equality movement. Do you find it just the least bit interesting, that you would post this in a thread with numerous examples of the opposite being true? MRM deals with issues that have been disregarded by feminism, and actively thwarted by feminist groups. MRM also deals with issues that involve men, through a masculine lens…
/r/MensRights21/07/13 12:17 AM
1

Disclaimer: The three men speaking are not MRAs. They are traditionalists. Barbosa explains this after about 8 minutes in, but if you're uninformed or don't have the time to watch through the beginning, this disclaimer is for you. You will find (some) men in this sub, in the MRM, who prescribe more to traditionalist views than those generally carried by MRAs, and it's a distinction that absolutely must be taught to the uninformed. Traditionalists share a lot of the same views as feminists, only …
/r/MensRights20/07/13 07:19 PM
6

I'd go even further than simply limiting feminism's influence in the west. The problem is pushing feminism into pockets where the underlying social structure is not at the point where its realistically possible to remove gender roles. No, what places like Afghanistan need more than feminism is a significant boost in their quality of life. The industrial revolution gave rise to it in the west, and as a side effect utilized the wealth disparity that existed and whose existence is instrumental in t…
/r/MensRights20/07/13 06:35 PM
5

Even if it is true that the majority of feminism does not have men's rights in mind, is it the best action to grow a men's right movement? Your question answers the question itself. If feminism does not address men's issues, then of course. I feel that would further divide us. So the answer is more feminism co-opting? They're already sinking their teeth into atheist circles, which has nothing at all to do with women's rights, except to lay blame for women's woes on yet another boogeyman in relig…
/r/MensRights20/07/13 04:57 PM
1

Like this? Might be able to find a used one since it's unavailable, but if you do that could cause all sorts of problems if it ever came time to establish chain of custody. Also some carriers force bluetooth crippling (ahem, Verizon), which again may be as simple as unrooting or could be botched from the manuf. EDIT: Even better.
/r/MensRights20/07/13 04:11 PM
3

There's some bleeding heart type comments about the plight of mothers, but mostly it's just a cesspool of bs having nothing to do about gender really. There's some if you look for them: 1mygranny replies: Before you start judging this mother, you don't know the situation at all. She might have been leaving an abuse husband. She might have had a job and got laid off. But this is in response to a comment saying: As for what to do in this situation..how about not spread ur legs for any old moron? S…
/r/MensRights20/07/13 08:51 AM
2

Focusing on strangers or friends of the parent remains something typically ignored by the courts without due cause. Significant others can be, but often requires that something noteworthy happen. For instance, suspected abuse of the child with a history of abuse by the new partner can be used to argue in court that, a material change has occurred that negatively affects the child. The link you supplied does not go into enough detail to discern what it was exactly that the boyfriend did to warran…
/r/MensRights20/07/13 07:54 AM
7

WTF is going on in Canada, seriously? I know the shooting in '89 has fueled resentment for 20+ years but honestly? It's quite ridiculous in the States but Canada seems to be on a whole other level. How the hell did they get such an openly extremist foothold up there?
/r/MensRights20/07/13 03:30 AM
2

I should have skimmed the responses before typing out my own. I agree with everything you said about the situation. I used the same school argument to prevent a move away a few years back.
/r/MensRights20/07/13 01:33 AM
4

Chance? Sure. How much of one depends on jurisdiction, judge in their case, history and all of that. A good argument could be made that placement with the mother is not in the best interest of the child. The fact that she's living with 2 unknown men is not entirely relevant, unless you're trying to make the argument that men, and unknown ones at that, are inherently bad for the boy to be around. Also irrelevant is her other child. Unless we're talking 5th, 6th, 7th child with multiple fathers an…
/r/MensRights20/07/13 01:25 AM
7

Nothing preventing men from writing under female pseudonyms, since when a woman says it apparently it carries more weight. Just a thought.
/r/MensRights19/07/13 07:01 AM
1

The study used data from a previous study, which showed that men and women were equally charitable, except when it was men being charitable while being observed by women. All other combinations of giver and observer were close to the same. The women weren't more charitable. Graph here. Previous article is linked in the footnotes.
/r/MensRights18/07/13 08:31 AM
10

Link to study here. Nothing really earth shattering. Further evidence to support that men are viewed as the workhorses of society, if that's where you want to go with it. Further evidence that all that nasty male behavior is influenced by female preference, aka men are what women want them to be. Male competition can benefit the public good, etc,. And from the linked article: Women’s selflessness remained the same whether they were being watched by women, men or nobody. They weren't the same, bu…
/r/MensRights18/07/13 08:22 AM
1

He may view it as the death of his first born son/daughter. In which case I don't see why it being her body is an issue. It's not an either-or situation. I, for example, am an atheist that doesn't buy that abortion isn't killing. I believe it's morally wrong in the vast majority of cases. I also believe that the circumstances surrounding the few pregnancies caused by rape and incest, are used to justify what's largely an aversion to responsibility for one's own actions. I also understand that I …
/r/MensRights18/07/13 05:37 AM
1

If you view abortion as a do-over then you're going to have a hard time accepting an outcome that is even remotely fair to both parties. he may not have that option just because he was born male He may not have that option because of who he chose to put his dick in. Again, you're acting like the father has no say in the matter, when the father does, and again the difference between fathers and mothers is that the father's choices end after the deed is done, AND YET AGAIN this is a biological con…
/r/MensRights18/07/13 04:35 AM
1

Unless either one of you forced the other, both of you consented to behavior that has a non-zero chance of producing offspring. The difference is that most of your legal options end after sex. You can have a problem with that situation, and you can feel the need to legislate outcomes that are more fair to those involved, but don't act like you were forced or had no say in the matter. Nature doesn't care about fair, it cares about what works, and what works is that women become pregnant and men d…
/r/MensRights18/07/13 03:11 AM
2

we argued for a long time She told me she missed her period she said that they were positive You'd be wise to go on more than just her word. In your situation, if you're in the US you can be ordered to pay support if she seeks it and you're recognized as the father, yes. You can even be ordered to pay the State support if she loses custody for some reason. The conditions surrounding the pregnancy doesn't matter as the paternal parent and your legal obligation to provide support. She can decide n…
/r/MensRights17/07/13 07:00 AM
5

Just because you study women's history does not make you a feminist by nature. You can just really like history and what women have done to influence it. First of all, I didn't make a claim that studying women's history makes you a feminist, just that Women's Studies = Feminist Studies. You are not an MRA because you poked your head into this thread. Trust me, the distinction is not lost on me. I discern the difference because, hello, have you ever taken a history class? Every major breakthrough…
/r/MensRights16/07/13 08:34 AM
14

She can fork her own kernel. Where Getting Shit Done, takes a backseat to the feels. Something tells me she won't, since there's obvious advantages of working with Linus of all people. Whether Linus can be an ass is largely irrelevant to what they're actually trying to accomplish. She's not conscripted (heh) to volunteer. The door is wide open for her to walk through it. I know another guy, who's now dead, but who was attributed to another successful venture. And there had always been complaints…
/r/MensRights16/07/13 07:44 AM
2

Some of your content appears elsewhere online. Not saying you took it, just that it's being reposted. DeviantArt is showing up some hits, for example. Hey, they say the sincerest form of flattery is imitation, right? Maybe it's a good thing. I'm sure more followers would be more beneficial, though. That's a ton of content to wade through and I admit I only had time for a cursory skim over, but everything looks decent enough. Thanks for putting in the time to put into words what many of us believ…
/r/MensRights16/07/13 07:18 AM
2

What is worth noting is that feminists are correct about one thing. Approximately only 2/3 of sexual assault will be reported. Wrong. Feminists are not correct that 2/3 of sexual assault will be reported. It's an impossible stat to pin down. Two-thirds of some number of rapes are reported, but what is some number? And, are we really going to fall for the same logical fallacy that when a woman makes a claim, it is true until proven otherwise? You have X number of claims that cannot be verified, o…
/r/MensRights16/07/13 06:52 AM
22

Women's studies is synonymous with feminist studies. Majoring in women's studies is like majoring in history Majoring in women's studies is like majoring in women's studies. If it were like majoring in history, you wouldn't feel the need to discern the difference when claiming: You do realize that means learning about things like what women have done throughout history, right? And women's rights movements, etc... Versus normal history classes where we learn all about what men have done, 99% of t…
/r/MensRights16/07/13 04:20 AM
4

At around the 11:30 mark GWW mentions that false accusations are a predominantly female phenomenon. Bearing in mind how rarely we come across a case where a female has been found legally culpable for a false accusation, and also disregarding for a moment the possibility of a man falsely accusing another man of rape, does anyone know of any case where a man was found to be falsely accusing a woman of rape(or sexual assault, since the whole men can't be raped thing and all that)? While it's not be…
/r/MensRights16/07/13 02:35 AM
4

There's so much wrong with this post. Are you implying men don't run the world? Men are often placed at the head of the table in exchange for the responsibility they're saddled with. That exchange, "power" for safety, culpability for innocence, has been the social contract in most civilizations throughout our history. It has a very practical advantage when living in a world that is not "safe" as we have now, that is not "easy" as we have now. Looking back at it through the lens of someone who ha…
/r/MensRights15/07/13 10:05 PM
2

I've only heard women complain about it since it doesn't say Workers Ahead. Your offense intrigues me.
/r/MensRights14/07/13 10:36 AM
0

Some observations. The manner in which you were replying to people in that thread was likely off-putting. I'm not saying you instigated it. I'm just saying it probably didn't help. Also, while this site has many international users and I'm certainly glad to have Aussies like yourself here, it's still true that many of the threads and commentors here are US-centric. I think it applies in this instance. I'm not aware of any legal obligation for US workers to report sexual harassment through the no…
/r/MensRights14/07/13 10:18 AM
4

Would have to agree with DaNiceguy on the distinction. Hate is an exceptionally strong emotion. While clearly sexist and discriminatory, I would not go so far as to say it qualifies as hate. I find it completely contradictory to legitimately hate women, and then willingly date them as OP's boyfriend apparently does. You do not seek the company of those you hate unless it is to confront them. You dislike Uncle Bob because he gets drunk during Thanksgiving and acts like an idiot, and he always tal…
/r/MensRights14/07/13 08:26 AM
2

yet the SPLC refuses to classify feminists as a hate group. There isn't money in it for the SPLC. Feminism is a cash-cow. Some of their legal staff walked out on them in the 80's because they were ignoring the plights of the poor in favor of high profile race cases. Think of the SPLC as the Jesse Jackson of the anti-hate groups. Can claim whatever goal they please, but the reality is that they fight to stay relevant and paid through exposure and scare tactics. The incident OP is referring to is …
/r/MensRights14/07/13 07:33 AM
2

Not all feminists support abortion, and MRA's are divided on the issue as well. Marc Lépine was not a men's rights activist, and he wasn't a masculinist or traditionalist or any other precursor to the MRM. He was anti-feminist and strictly speaking that isn't what men's rights is all about, although we are vocal about things that feminism has stood in the way of or fought to impose on men. I don't even know if the women he killed did in fact identify as being feminist, and the only MRA's that ha…
/r/MensRights14/07/13 06:52 AM
2

Comment history is all over the place. From semi-coherent, to passive calls to violence, to juvenile "your stupid", to positive comments about the MRM and this sub, and back again. I don't think the OP has their head on straight, tbh. They call feminists idiots a few days ago, then come in here saying feminists are "way politically smarter". Doesn't make sense. Substance abuse, emotional problems, who knows. I'd pin it on an overload of thoughts and feelings and an inability to cope, with frustr…
/r/MensRights14/07/13 06:22 AM
13

Do they know the gravity that comes with that word? They absolutely do and the word isn't mistakenly chosen. They've been particularly adept at word-smithing. Adopting all of the racial issues in the civil rights movement allowed them to stand and claim unity with those who were oppressed in ways that western white women have not and will never experience. If you're power stems from perpetual victimhood, who better than to claim similarities with than a (literally) enslaved race? That wasn't an …
/r/MensRights13/07/13 11:49 PM
1

Going into detail she mentioned things such as being competetive, stoic, dominant, aggressive and strong as toxic masculinity and ass-hatery or something like that. The problem is all those are normal traits in a person with failry high testosterone levels. I don't agree this is the case any longer, with low testosterone levels in men now being attributed to some pretty nasty effects such as depression which can manifest itself in outbursts that one could believe to be the cause of higher than n…
/r/MensRights13/07/13 11:39 PM
3

How and why do you feel like you're paying for their "fornication habits?" Maybe you're against aspects of taxation moreso than the idea of marriage. On that note, marriage can make a whole lot of sense financially even without the tax incentives. If you don't find the "love" argument to be compelling enough, than money speaks pretty loudly to most people and is a valid reason for doing so.
/r/MensRights13/07/13 09:13 PM
8

Seems expertly crafted to rustle maximum jimmies doesn't it?
/r/MensRights13/07/13 08:37 PM
18

Seems like they'd like to retain the benefits and privileges of the past without admitting that such privileges existed, doesn't it?
/r/MensRights13/07/13 08:22 PM
21

Sentence seems outrageously disproportionate to the crime, but I still don't like the slant her attorney tried to present, that the legislation did not foresee that the heavy handed mandatory minimums would apply to people like her client, or rather that the harsh sentences would not apply to women. I also find the waterworks and appealing to emotions to be offensive and sexist in that men can't pull that tactic. It's an admittance that women are viewed differently. Minimum mandatories do remove…
/r/MensRights13/07/13 08:11 PM
1

Formatting is difficult to read, so apologies if it was mentioned somewhere in there, but what state is this? Child support is typically awarded to the custodial parent by the non-custodial parent, the reasoning being that the custodial parent is taking the lion's share of the financial responsibility in raising the child. If custody is split 50/50, physically and/or legally, then on what grounds is your attorney claiming the mother would receive support without a change in custody as well? Does…
/r/MensRights13/07/13 07:46 PM
2

You need to get an attorney before you do anything. I believe PA is gender neutral now when it comes to presumption of legal custodial rights, but there's some caveats. Like, are you on the birth certificate as the father or have you otherwise established paternity, or is there any documentation that would be recognized as you being the father before you take this child out of the state? If not, you could be setting yourself up for some serious legal repercussions. If you're both recognized as b…
/r/MensRights13/07/13 07:22 PM
1

The WNBA, as far as I know, is not associated with the NBA and is self sufficient. The only reason the WNBA exists is because there is a demand for it. There is demand for it, but only recently has there been enough demand for the league to turn a proift, without the assistance of the NBA. In the beginning, all(?) the WNBA teams were also owned by the NBA team owners from the same city. The WNBA would have never gotten off the ground if not for the NBA. I mean, the WNBA was and clearly is tied t…
/r/MensRights13/07/13 05:22 AM
0

You cannot be both protected and oppressed, until those who've protected you have made your world safe enough to where you no longer need the protection. Western women are transitioning quickly into a world unknown to their female ancestors in which men have removed or significantly reduced any barrier that would have prevented them from having a safe, fulfilling life independent of the duties of the men in their life. We made it safer with medicine, we eliminated or reduced hunger, we leveled b…
/r/MensRights12/07/13 08:06 AM
3

Because the argument the claim that a FALSE allegation hurts the one making the allegation more so than the one being falsely accused happens where, exactly, besides cases of alleged rape?
/r/MensRights12/07/13 06:29 AM
5

You mean to say, assuming claims are not true without compelling evidence makes it more difficult for those making the allegation, than it is towards the person who the claim is against. Which is true, as it is when reporting any crime. Except most rapes, unlike most crimes, leave little to no hard evidence that it occurred, and you're left with 2+ stories that don't coincide. Using women's emotions as an excuse for an exception in the case of rape, is akin to throwing around the "Think of the c…
/r/MensRights12/07/13 06:21 AM
1

I'd like to see some data on the posts that make it to the front page of reddit over the span of 3, 6, and 12 months back. I've repeatedly heard how misogynistic the posts here are, and how reddit is just a cesspool of woman hating sexist little boys, and the "safe" places for women on this site are few and far between. I'm subbed to all the defaults, and my front page is typically filled with posts that have nothing to do with hating women: adviceanimals, or video games, or some celebrity ama, …
/r/MensRights12/07/13 05:59 AM
2

I think many would label any false accusation made, whether it were reported to police or saw a courtroom to be a false accusation, the same way many would consider a rape to have occurred whether it were reported to the police, saw a courtroom, and ended in a credit of guilt or not. The problem with obtaining accurate numbers of false allegations is the same problem people should have with rape statistics: self reporting relating to a crime that can rarely be proven past your classic he said sh…
/r/MensRights12/07/13 05:24 AM
2

Valid response to being labeled a feminist if you aren't one. Whoever is burying the comment: stop.
/r/MensRights12/07/13 04:38 AM
1

This would be incredibly foolish in the States at least, even with the damning stigma of an accusation. You would have to prove that the allegation as false, which essentially amounts to proving a negative, and you'd be discussing an alleged criminal offense with serious repercussions in a (most likely) civil court. Those are extraordinarily low odds for an incredibly high risk legal maneuver. Even if you're innocent, ESPECIALLY if you're innocent, the safest bet is to distance yourself from the…
/r/MensRights12/07/13 04:17 AM
6

Many of the unfair rulings in my area are in the JD&R and civil courts, which means proceedings are defacto sealed from the public. We intuitively know what's systematically being done, but our hands are all but tied in getting that information exposure without time and resources pushing cases to higher courts. It's so widespread and accepted some of the things that happen in these courts that what should be an obvious example of gender bias instead need be something incredibly heinous and outla…
/r/MensRights05/07/13 07:54 AM
1

Oh, right, I forgot - a woman said that once, which means it's true of all feminists. Yet when MRAs do something awful, it's a scramble of "this doesn't represent all MRAs!!!" In a thread where, when looking at the first line of the OP's TL;DR you find: TL;DR: I’ve heard a MRA activist claim Strong irony, Ripowal. If even half a percent of self-proclaimed feminists were of the extremist type, I'd bet the farm their numbers would dwarf the number of truly misogynistic assholes who claim the MRA b…
/r/MensRights05/07/13 06:42 AM
1

I'm not coming from a legal background, but I had a similar idea a few years back, albeit with audio and not video. "Accidentally" recorded a threat involving the removal of my daughter from the state if I wouldn't engage my then girlfriend in some very particular sexual acts. I say accidental, because as a recovering alcoholic I was taking a stand against her drug and alcohol use in front of our kid, and she didn't take kindly to it, and was loudly and proudly stating the fact that she can "smo…
/r/MensRights28/03/13 07:03 AM
2

Audio recording is covered in your state's wiretapping laws, and often you can find related links for video surveillance in those same links. Home surveillance vendors would probably be able to advise you on which states and under which circumstances their products can be used. Your best bet, of course, would be to contact an attorney. EDIT: Might I give my non-legal opinion, and simply say that it might not be advisable to archive your sexual endeavors? I see the appeal in what you're asking, b…
/r/MensRights28/03/13 05:32 AM
2

Even if you had a signed waiver and postings on your door before entry, if there is a reasonable expectation of privacy of the person being recorded, then no it is not legal. For instance, if you enter a building that has stated plainly that video surveillance is in use, it would not be legal to put a hidden camera in the bowl of a toilet. Even though those entering the building would be aware of surveillance, a reasonable person would still expect privacy in the area of a restroom stall where t…
/r/MensRights28/03/13 05:23 AM
20

I think they generally take issue when men ask them a question, they answer it, and then men respond how their answer was wrong. Which makes sense, since the sub is /r/AskWomen and not /r/DebateWomen. FWIW I posted a follow-up question to the top rated response and wasn't banned, but I wasn't debating. I don't think it's the proper sub to debate feminists in, and the ban is your cue to try your luck in the appropriate sub would be my guess.
/r/MensRights24/12/12 12:30 PM
4

I'm not shocked at all. India is much different than the States. The caste system, the corrupt law enforcement, not to mention a number of highly publicized incidents of abuse against women recently has brought things to a tipping point. The state has basically failed its obligation to protect its members, and women specifically do have a legitimate grievance to be had. I don't like when things turn violent, but I'm not going to suggest that they should peacefully protest given the subject and t…
/r/MensRights24/12/12 12:16 PM
2

It is always legal to record Incorrect. True under most circumstances but incorrect as a blanket statement. An excellent example would be setting up a listening device to record a conversation to which you are not a party of. Say by leaving a voice recorder in a room prior to a closed meeting and not attending, or having a third party eavesdrop on a telephone conversation to eavesdrop and record, while not actually being part of the conversation. These example would not fly even in a single part…
/r/MensRights19/11/12 05:42 AM
1

Typically, the court will attempt to have her served and in failing to do so will still have the hearing. At that point, it's up to the judge whether they will hear the case then or continue it and attempt to have her found and served. In some instances, you can pay to have a notice put in a local newspaper in circulation, or they can post the notice at the courthouse. It depends on your jurisdiction and the judge hearing it, but the fact that you don't know her location does not prevent you fro…
/r/MensRights24/09/12 12:08 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter