TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

rampantdissonance Archive

View 0 posts and 25 comments by rampantdissonance on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
-2

Alright. The way your comment is phrase, it seems like you feel there is an injustice by the fact that she wasn't arrested, and are rooting for civil charges. As opposed to finding out whether or not there's any cause for it.
/r/MensRights24/12/15 01:12 AM
2

Serious question- how is it certain that this is a false accusation, and not one that just didn't have enough evidence to go to trial?
/r/MensRights24/12/15 12:55 AM
-12

Nah, quote mining is when you pick something and strip it of context to make a point that's different from what the speaker intended. For example- If someone speaks the words "They said that I hate women." and someone quotes them as "I hate women." -Speaker that's quote mining. This was a fair representation of the views expressed. He really does believe that it would be just to blanket declare every alleged rapist innocent regardless of evidence
/r/MensRights09/06/14 04:04 AM
4

http://www.avoiceformen.com/mens-rights/jury-duty-at-a-rape-trial-acquit/
/r/MensRights09/06/14 02:02 AM
-23

Considering it's Paul Elam, the link isn't too far off. This is the guy that vowed to vote not guilty in any rape case that he's a juror for regardless of how strong the evidence is, and encourages the others to do the same.
/r/MensRights09/06/14 01:26 AM
8

Free birth control helps everyone. It eases up pressure on social programs, and helps cut spending. When you help people have children when they choose to, they tend to do so when they're financially secure. Not to mention, the men who are partners get the benefits, too. The STD help for women but not men- benefits still all around, as with better treatment, men will be less likely to catch STD's. Obviously it would be better if such treatment were given to men, too. But it helps women directly …
/r/MensRights28/06/12 09:49 PM
2

This is a common problem that often occurs when people relatively new to the theory of evolution want to try to find an explicit gene for everything. There was a similar issue when Richard Dawkins explained genetic reasons for homosexuality. He went over the basic theories like group selection, but then cautioned that genetic replication is not a strict one to one, meaning that there is not a gene for every single action and body part. Regarding homosexuality, all we can say for certain is that …
/r/seduction02/04/11 11:56 PM
0

No, I'm afraid not. Imagine a rich guy who says "I have a friend that drives a Lamborghini. That must mean most people in the US drive them." That's as wrong as a man saying, "All my friends drive Lamborghinis. That must mean everyone in America is driving them." Statisticians have a term for that, but it completely escapes me at the moment.
/r/seduction02/04/11 10:27 PM
1

But that's the thing- the difference between a drunk person (man or woman) who enthusiastically consents to sex that will remember it and a drunk person who enthusiastically consents to sex that won't remember is not something that is apparent. And having impaired speech is not a sign that someone cannot consent to sex. After 3 of 4 drinks I start to slur if I do not speak slowly and deliberately, but I shouldn't think that means I can't consent to sex. A lot of feminists like the Enthusiastic C…
/r/MensRights21/03/11 07:24 AM
1

Edit. If there is a possibility that she/he had had too much alcohol and wouldn't remember it the next day, you shouldn't be having sex. The problem is, there's no visual indication. Alcohol affects different parts of the brain differently. The part of the brain that writes your short term memory into your long term memory (the hippocampus) shuts down long before one passes out. This means that if a drunk girl is flirting with a guy, he will have absolutely physical indication that she will not …
/r/MensRights20/03/11 08:18 PM
3

I'm a circumcised male, and I think whatever benefits the process may have had are in the past are passed, and it is currently without merit. Anatomically speaking, the clit and penis are developed from the same tissue. So a male losing his foreskin would be like a female losing her clitoral hood. Unnecessary, but not tragic. There is nothing resembling a scientific consensus on what the effects are. Research shows many different and varied findings. Some show improvement, some show no change, a…
/r/MensRights31/01/11 09:13 AM
1

So that explains where you are on Prop 8. What do you think of gay rights in general?
/r/MensRights21/10/10 03:04 AM
2

I know opinions are varied in the Men's Rights movement. I'm interested in knowing what the mod of this subreddit thinks.
/r/MensRights21/10/10 02:49 AM
2

Just curious, but what is your view on Prop 8?
/r/MensRights20/10/10 11:25 PM
8

I'd just like to point out that I'm the first person in the comic and I am a guy.
/r/MensRights19/10/10 08:47 PM
3

I guess that makes sense. I find male bodies just as aesthetically pleasing as female bodies, but in the movies, male nudity is almost always a source of comedy rather than eroticism. Most male nudity in films is in the form of Will Ferell from Old School, while most female in films is in the form of the actress from Titanic.
/r/MensRights16/10/10 04:09 AM
1

From what I can tell, he was the professor of a very small class that happened to get some coverage on CSPAN. It was an instance where the university said, "Oh shit! We accidentally gave a crazy person a mic!" I can't find him on the list now, so I assume he's been removed. There was quite a bit of press about this. Predictably, he was talked about a lot on Fox News.
/r/MensRights11/09/10 06:15 PM
4

Well, if we're really going to split hairs, it would be Professor and Congresswoman. One of each. I attended the university where a black professor advocated exterminating white people. I wouldn't claim that as evidence that academia is genocidal toward whites. Not that that excuses what the ladies said, though.
/r/MensRights09/09/10 06:39 PM
0

First of all, this board is a place for discussion, not spamming. Someone says "Fuck everything about that." and you respond that he's looking at it backward? It's amazing how many men think it's perfectly sensible to worry about false accusations of rape, and yet somehow think it's extremist or Islamic to say that a woman should be restricted in how she dresses or acts around a man. Seriously? You're using a napalm launcher to get rid of a hornets nest. The nest is a problem, but the napalm wil…
/r/MensRights07/09/10 06:38 AM
5

groans Let me try to explain this. Rape is unacceptable in any circumstance. It's wrong when it's man on woman, woman on man, man on man, or woman on woman. No matter who you are, you have the right to your own body and you have the right to refuse sexual advances. The blogger in the post fails to realize this. She thinks some men don't have concern for women who are raped, so she thinks men getting raped is perfectly acceptable. How is that different from what you're doing? She has no compassio…
/r/MensRights30/08/10 08:04 PM
8

The "no true scotsman fallacy" has to be the second most overused and misused internet comeback ever (with the first being reducto ad hitlerum, of course). The NTS fallacy is when, according to the wikipedia link you provided, a universal claim is modified when a counter-example is provided. A: All Scotsmen enjoy haggis. B: I'm Scottish. I don't. A: Well, you're not a true Scotsman. is an example of the fallacy. A: Christians believe Jesus died and rose from the dead. B: I'm a Christian, I don't…
/r/MensRights15/08/10 07:05 AM
8

So more supporters to the cause is a bad thing?
/r/MensRights15/08/10 06:45 AM
4

Schadenfreude reflects poorly upon us. The implication that we delight in seeing a girl in an already difficult having her life ruined does not speak good about us.
/r/MensRights29/04/10 08:08 PM
2

le sigh Maybe I'm just naive. It seems obvious that if everyone had a genuine concern for everybody else we'd all be better off. "Be excellent to each other." "Party on, dudes!" In the grand scheme of things, what she did was worse, but if he would have just helped her, she wouldn't have done it. But what did he gain from waiting until the end to show the video? Does it really make him feel that much better by making a shitty situation even worse for her? Just a reminder, I believe what she did …
/r/MensRights29/04/10 08:05 PM
4

Jesus fucking Christ on a cracker, people wonder why Men's Rights activist have a bad rep. What she did was inexcusable, don't get me wrong, but she was pregnant, hormonal, and most of all, scared of being out on the street and not acting rational. She saw this as an easier way out. It would be so much better for all parties involved if he would have just helped her when she asked for it. He was a jerk to her when she came to him for help. No one deserves a false rape accusation, but it was reta…
/r/MensRights29/04/10 07:31 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter