TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

randezvouswithrama Archive

View 11 posts and 229 comments by randezvouswithrama on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
132

Edu./Occu.randezvouswithrama/r/MensRights08/05/18 04:51 AM
112

Marriage/Childrenrandezvouswithrama/r/MensRights12/05/18 05:53 AM
48

Social Issuesrandezvouswithrama/r/MensRights07/05/18 06:30 PM
38

Generalrandezvouswithrama/r/MensRights07/05/18 05:37 PM
26

Social Issuesrandezvouswithrama/r/MensRights17/05/18 06:36 PM
22

Feminismrandezvouswithrama/r/MensRights24/04/18 07:17 AM
19

Social Issuesrandezvouswithrama/r/MensRights29/04/18 03:17 PM
18

Generalrandezvouswithrama/r/MensRights15/04/18 04:15 PM
16

Social Issuesrandezvouswithrama/r/MensRights21/04/18 05:09 AM
8

Social Issuesrandezvouswithrama/r/MensRights25/04/18 07:35 AM
3

Social Issuesrandezvouswithrama/r/MensRights17/04/18 09:13 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
14

Getting the hump is hard, even harder than the six pack..
/r/MensRights21/05/18 04:16 AM
3

My hobby is to send high ranking people and MSM email when they show feminist tendencies or don't understand - or pretend not to understand - how gynocentric they are. Sometimes the results have been positive. (Perhaps I should send an email to Google telling that their spellchecker doesn't know the word "gynocentric". Then again, they probably know it already :D )
/r/MensRights20/05/18 07:52 AM
3

Groups have an identity of their own and that identity both attracts certain people to the group and forms them over time when they have joined.
/r/MensRights20/05/18 07:43 AM
1

Stalin, the Ironman :D
/r/MensRights20/05/18 07:40 AM
3

In Finland there were two school shootings ten years ago and at least one that was prevented. They occur in waves, it seems. After that we have been spared, perhaps because there is now a system that tries to recognize possible perpetrators and offer them help. Then again, outliers are outliers.
/r/MensRights19/05/18 08:18 AM
2

Yeah, that was obviously wrong. 150 million years is a better guess. I blame dementia. :D
/r/MensRights19/05/18 03:43 AM
1

Pressing Enter every now and then is a good idea. Next ...
/r/MensRights18/05/18 07:16 PM
2

North See oil is about 1.5 million years old.
/r/MensRights18/05/18 12:16 PM
6

Holland isn't Scandinavia but never mind, they, too, have a universal health care. It doesn't mean socialist health care but a system that guarantees "free" health care for everyone.
/r/MensRights18/05/18 12:13 PM
6

The fact that the society is gynocentric isn't a conspiracy. Rather, it has to do with biology and a (false) narrative claiming that women in particular are oppressed and discriminated against.
/r/MensRights18/05/18 09:19 AM
1

Fazer sells bread in Sweden but not this particular brand, Reissumies (Travelling Man). In Finland they don't make Swedish versions of TV ads ever, well, at least I don't remember seeing any. But hopefully they add English subtitles to this one. With a little luck it could go viral in these times of misandrism when both men and women need to be reminded that men are important and loved. And that it could be a good idea to say it to men every now and then.
/r/MensRights18/05/18 09:00 AM
1

On of the reasons is, indeed, the widening equality gap: women and men tend to live in different worlds socially and even geographically more and more.
/r/MensRights18/05/18 08:16 AM
3

In most western countries circumcision is frowned upon, but nothing is done about it because of religious and ethnic reasons (Muslims, Jews).
/r/MensRights18/05/18 08:08 AM
7

False or questionable accusations might skyrocket, if this means that a woman can call the police if she's approached by a "creep" or a man she's not interested in.
/r/MensRights17/05/18 05:55 PM
11

a darkly comedic story that explores a multitude of issues faced by women today – including patriarchy, misogyny, rape culture, and unrealistic beauty standards. Commercializing feminism with these kind of entertainment products is going to break the fabric of the society perhaps even faster than the earlier attempts. Then again, perhaps women hate it and the feminist, men-hating audience isn't big enough to keep it afloat.
/r/MensRights17/05/18 05:33 PM
6

The judge is saying that, if you're a mute, you can't be jailed. Good for mute criminals.
/r/MensRights17/05/18 06:23 AM
3

Women want their male partners to be stable and strong. Women hate or despise unstable and weak men and won't get into intimate relationships with them. So, yeah, there is no reason for a man to hold feelings in, if he isn't interested in intimate relationships - or, come to think of it - the respect of others in general.
/r/MensRights17/05/18 06:06 AM
5

First reports then interpretations. Tiger Woods is now serial cheater. It's somehow man's fault most of the time. Probably he was no-good.
/r/MensRights16/05/18 04:35 PM
2

Let's see what's his punishment is going to be. Just a character assasination by the media or legal ramifications?
/r/MensRights16/05/18 04:01 PM
-3

Sometimes nazi means a person who's a nazi or act the same way as nazis did/do. Feminazis, for example, hate certain people because of their sex and/or race (says the white man). The hated out-groups function to strengthen the identity and ideological purity. Instead of arguments they favor propaganda and so on.
/r/MensRights16/05/18 03:51 PM
1

Sounds a bit alarmist. Sure, there are a few feminists who want men dead but that's not the "dark heart". On the other hand, the number of influential feminists who want to dethrone men, destroy masculinity, and the girls to overtake boys in everything is alarmingly great. Perhaps that's the dark heart of feminism.
/r/MensRights16/05/18 08:16 AM
-4

The reason why you are wrong you can read in any Economics 101 - or by thinking this simple fact: earnings are based (in the long run) solely on productivity, and increasing the amount of work doesn't decrease productivity ( in the long run), because firms always have to compete on productivity and those who lose will go bankrupt Think about any successful firm that increases the number of employers. You seem to think that it's impossible without lowering the wages of the employers already worki…
/r/MensRights15/05/18 09:08 AM
1

For me the first result is the same, with or without a space. If it was otherwise. I would be very disappointed- Google is, after all, a superb search engine despite of all other craziness.
/r/MensRights15/05/18 07:52 AM
1

Perhaps it's because you're in a different country? Especially if it's a country where English isn't the official language. Nope, it doesn't work that way.
/r/MensRights15/05/18 07:49 AM
-1

This is pretty much the same kind of a myth as the wage gap myth: in a dynamic market economy they simply can't be true. Hopefully this misunderstanding won't become the "MRAs wage gap theory", that is, the laughing stock of anybody who knows how things work. Go ahead an downvote, but it doesn't change the fact that increasing the supply of work doesn't lower earnings in the long run. If it would, every nation, whose population has grown, would have become poorer over time. And that's not what h…
/r/MensRights15/05/18 07:11 AM
1

Medical screenings and other medical support. Then there are thousands of charities helping females in all kinds of ways.
/r/MensRights14/05/18 08:02 PM
2

There are lots of reason why the widening equality gap is not talked about. Among the more important: People want to help and protect women, not men (it's partly biological). Feminists have almost a monopoly when it comes to gender equality questions and they couldn't care less of the problems of boys and men or the what's good for "all". Men can be hated and despised to but not women while remaining politically correct. Women have powerful networks aiming at helping girls and women, men don't. …
/r/MensRights14/05/18 11:23 AM
2

Perhaps the most remarkable thing is how clueless everyone is when the gender gap widens fast the way it does. Almost nobody has anything clever or even morally substantial to say about it, even when it's perhaps the biggest social problem, catastrophe, the west is facing. The truth is out there, but it's so politically incorrect and against everything we 've been taught that we rather let the catastrophe happen than start talking about it honestly.
/r/MensRights14/05/18 06:17 AM
1

A lot of Nazis here talking about the Jewish privileges. (If they weren't Nazis, they would be talking about the Muslims as well.)
/r/MensRights14/05/18 05:50 AM
2

Men have to send stronger signals to customers that they are OK, trustworthy and playing by the book. Women are OK even if they wear yoga pants. It's pretty irrational but that's the way it is - even in places like parliaments.
/r/MensRights14/05/18 04:37 AM
1

Have you ever thought why feminists support paternity leave so eagerly? I can tell it's not to help men, it never is.
/r/MensRights13/05/18 07:36 PM
2

Educated folks should work more stupid to close the education pay gap. Hey, this is brilliant! Astronauts should work as farmers to close the wage gap between astronauts and farmers.
/r/MensRights13/05/18 07:31 PM
1

Women are often aroused by themselves via the man's excitement. "I'm so hot i his eyes that I'm gonna come." :)
/r/MensRights13/05/18 04:44 PM
6

More heavy metal: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gAh9NRGNhUU
/r/MensRights13/05/18 05:40 AM
5

Nobody knows how much women spend. They spend more than men but how much more is and will remain unknown.
/r/MensRights12/05/18 03:44 PM
12

It seems that it's an important question and getting more important each passing year. Share holders and possible share holders want to know how the company is run: economically or politically. If it's true, as certain studies have indicated, that firms with a political agenda on average lose value. And if this political agenda can be seen for example in the way they fill the board member seats, then it's pretty clear what you should do: sell your "political shares" and buy shares of a competito…
/r/MensRights12/05/18 03:06 PM
3

I could give you a link to a Finnish survey right away but that's not representative, when you're talking about the USA. But my guess is that the figure isn't that different in other parts of Northern Europe. It would be interesting to go through the search results of "how many afraid of violence home". Unfortunately the results are riddled, as usual, with all kinds of "feminist" articles and stuff - and I don't have time for it now. Perhaps later.
/r/MensRights12/05/18 07:47 AM
2

Perhaps about 1% of the population are "true" psychopaths and something like 0.5% of men and women tell that they are afraid of violence in their homes. Anyway, I'm sure that part of the "serial beaters" are psychopaths: no empathy, an urge to control and manipulate. I've even read about it but can't remember where. But what's their share? I don't know but my guess is that most.
/r/MensRights12/05/18 07:36 AM
3

I tend to divide people into psychopaths and others in these kinds of contexts. They should be treated differently. If a man is psychopathic, he usually wants to dominate and can easily use violence. I think that the "stereotypical" male DV perpetrator, you can read about in feminist litterature, in particular, is is actually a psychopath. I've read something about this but have no real evidence at hand. It just sounds right, taken into account that the "normal" attitude men have toward women is…
/r/MensRights12/05/18 07:11 AM
6

Could you, please, provide any further (non-feminist or otherwise non-political) evidence that women don't use DV to establish dominance? Doesn't sound right according to my personal experience. Most partner violence I've seen has been women showing who's the boss. Then again, most DV between men and women is just two drunken or otherwise crazed people brawling. It's hard to say if there's any purpose behind it.
/r/MensRights12/05/18 06:49 AM
8

Then again it could be that mothers use violence against children for the same reason why they hit their partners (particularly in lesbian relationships where the threat of a serious retribution is smaller than with a man). I don't know why that is but ... mood swings perhaps? Defining the hierarchy of the family?
/r/MensRights12/05/18 06:18 AM
3

I live in a country where the physical punishment of children is illegal. And it's very rare, too. I think it works fine this way too. But probably mild physical punishments are OK if they are part of the culture. If parents hit children because they are angry or unstable, that's never OK, tho.
/r/MensRights12/05/18 06:08 AM
3

Countries differ surprisingly from each other, though. For example, Columbia seems to be a bad place for girls and Italy for boys. Then again, anybody who's watched Fellini's movies isn't surprised that boys get smacked in the head: "stupido".
/r/MensRights12/05/18 05:59 AM
7

Stories that favor the female view get published because a female view is considered by default morally and often even factually better than a male view almost all the time (gynocentrism), the very best in almost everything tend to be men, so, it doesn't feel wrong to endorse women in everything (without seeing that most men aren't among the very best either), feminist strategy is to tell people that women are treated unfairly all the time and and in every situation (to gain power) and there are…
/r/MensRights12/05/18 04:55 AM
17

“They are a little more afraid” to make commitments in real estate but seem to be fine with living in a nice, well-located rental. Most nice, well-located rentals tend to go to single women. Single men are discriminated against even in the rental market.
/r/MensRights11/05/18 07:18 PM
4

My guess is that women have more secure jobs, so they''l get loans easier and feel that they can pay them back. Of course they can have better wages as well.
/r/MensRights11/05/18 06:48 PM
6

I’m a woman. I was raped by a woman. And I know what you’re thinking. And that's what? Business as usual?
/r/MensRights11/05/18 10:19 AM
2

Yeah, women want - outwards -unemotional men who can function as the stable foundation of the relationships amidst the female mood swings. Lesbian relationships tend to be more turbulent and violent just because the "anchor" is often missing. There are studies on this. Women want men to be strong both physically and emotionally. In hard times they want the man to be the strong and resilient one. Sexually dominant man is the most common sexual fantasy among women. And many women do get excited by…
/r/MensRights11/05/18 08:56 AM
1

Josephine Jobbins writes that a prevailing idea of masculinity — unemotional, strong, sexually dominant and violent — should not be considered a modern phenomenon. Indeed, those are some of the more important traits women have been admiring in men for at least 200 000 years, and probably millions of years even before that (just with one correction: not "violent" but capable of violence - and aggression - if needed). This sexual selection has been going on for so long that they have become part o…
/r/MensRights11/05/18 06:21 AM
5

“For some reason Hmm, what could be done about it that you don't know anything about the subject, perhaps study it? Not all litterature and all studies are about girls or trivial things, some actually try to find the reason for perhaps the biggest social problem we have and come up with solutions. Like, it's known beyond all doubt that there should be more male teachers, and that female teachers give boys lower test scores and grades and so on.
/r/MensRights10/05/18 06:17 PM
3

What is needed is women who don't want have children but want to work. And, if they do have children, don't want to spend time with them as much as nowadays but work instead. Why don't they say anything about this real solution? Why it's always about how government and employers have to solve the problem and men have to change? Ah, now I get it, it's feminism, the equality movement, that's behind the recommendations.
/r/MensRights10/05/18 03:45 PM
76

In Finland whopping 78% of men under 30 are childless, and men's childlessness in general is even higher than in Norway. If the trend continues, the last Finn will be born in 2063. And Finland is among the top three when it comes to gender equality, LOL. The trend is so alarming that even the ministry of finance has started talking about it and the widening equality gap behind the trend. Who's gonna pay the pensions if they are no citizens? Personally I think there is sort of biblical justice in…
/r/MensRights10/05/18 07:46 AM
1

But that still gives criminals a way to commit crimes and walk free, which in return gives them a motive for the crime. Looks very counterproductive in that sense. It's a catch 22.
/r/MensRights10/05/18 06:33 AM
10

It looks like somebody managed to get an anti-feminist article published in a way that is very hard to hate publicly - even for feminists. The lesson to take home: if you want to make an unpopular opinion heard make it about personal injustice. Even haters find it hard to oppose to that without looking cold hearted.
/r/MensRights10/05/18 06:27 AM
2

When that is the rule you can easily plan a crime and, if all goes well, be sure that you will never get punished.
/r/MensRights10/05/18 06:09 AM
2

Google doesn't know the app. Any link? Anyway, if a woman (perhaps even a man?) gives consent at some point doesn't mean that she can't withdraw that consent later, which makes such apps pretty useless.
/r/MensRights10/05/18 06:05 AM
3

Does that go for all crimes? If I killed somebody and then framed somebody else and then later recanted, should we both go free? Or if I stole your money and made it look that you yourself had laundered it to a foreign bank, if I later told the truth, should they let me keep the stolen money and go free so that other people weren't afraid to recant? Or is it just rape cases? Doesn't a system like that give bad people both incentive and means to destroy lives for their own benefit: just make sure…
/r/MensRights10/05/18 05:59 AM
1

I tried to explain this thing with a) examples of me (usually the easiest way to explain something is with examples from the everyday life) and b) in more abstract terms (which works with people who have some training in abstract thinking, like education). It seems to me that you didn't understand either way. I'm not going to try the third time with yet another method. Surely you must understan why. But if you still want to know what my argument was, reread my posts trying to keep in mind that i…
/r/MensRights09/05/18 09:25 PM
1

The first example should be obvious to any person who has, say , as a teenager been to a party where the girl he wanted didn't respond to his desire. I don't know, perhaps you didn't have the hormones I had - which made sex seem like the ultimate goal in life - or perhaps you always got the girl. (And this was an example, I'm sure you can come up with more examples yourself of situations where not getting sex i frustrating.) The second example was about why parents and children don't, say, watch…
/r/MensRights09/05/18 08:08 PM
2

I have. If the person looks sexy and I can't have sex with that person, for example. That, by the way, was probably the main reason why earlier and many present cultures - where sex was something only about 40% of men could ever get according to DNA studies - had stricter rules for clothing. Too much sexual tension and frustration was a threat to the society. Another example: I'm in a public place with my sons and a person who is dressed in leggings and a bra wants to talk to the kids. I feel ve…
/r/MensRights09/05/18 07:33 PM
3

Shouldn't we start thinking that provocative clothing is itself a form of sexual assault? When you provocatively send sexual signals to everybody that makes many people uneasy, stressed, and having negative feelings in general. I mean, aren't we told that men aren't allowed to look at women or flirt with them unless the woman gives a permission. And if they do, it's like an assault. Provocative clothing almost exactly the same thing.
/r/MensRights09/05/18 06:52 PM
3

Joe Hagan’s superb new biography of Rolling Stone founder Jann Wenner. As Hagan describes the magazine’s early years in the 1960s, just about everyone on the staff—male and female—was having sex with everyone else It would be interesting to know how the magazine organized its recruiting so that the hied men were attractive enough for the female staff. However they did it, it doesn't sound like a good way to create a high-quality magazine.
/r/MensRights09/05/18 06:38 PM
3

I didn't say that the deciding factor of civilization is masculinity. What on earth made you think that? The western civilization is something that happened and nobody can ever say why. But, unless you're into feminist history writing, you can't deny the fact that it was men who mostly were its founders. That is called a historical fact. Write that down for future reference. The rest is just evasion that is typical to feminists and other haters who cherry pick one idea and make hostile and stupi…
/r/MensRights08/05/18 07:17 PM
1

Of course I know the concept but that has nothing to do with the crazy ideas of mr rooster. This is how it works: We have our summer place in a rich neighborhood, quite a few successful millionaires with big houses. I've visited several. But the houses are hidden behind trees, except for a few. That's because the rich often feel that they shouldn't show off. But that never prevented them from becoming rich and living in big houses.
/r/MensRights08/05/18 06:58 PM
2

It'd be silly to read a wikiedia article on the Nordic countries when I actually live here and know first hand what's going on.
/r/MensRights08/05/18 06:42 PM
8

You don't know your science. But even so, you should understand based your everyday experiences that masculinity is mostly a positive force (most men are doing all kind of positive things all the time that wouldn't often get done if they didn't do them), men are rarely violent (come to think of it, it must be decades since I saw male violence the last time), aggression rarely lead to violence (see Osathegreat's answer) and women are more aggressive, just not outside their homes (though women are…
/r/MensRights08/05/18 06:33 PM
1

Sorry to say, but don't make sense unless you are trolling - what you of course are doing.
/r/MensRights08/05/18 04:41 PM
6

I have wondered if feminists understand that the only solution to the wage gap is what you say - or, more likely, that women have to start working more. I doubt it. Then again, many of them know it's pure and simple propaganda.
/r/MensRights08/05/18 04:11 PM
14

One difference is that the employer would be making his own decisions all by herself while the male professors weren't. The new rules were forced on them. Besides, some instances of sexism/racism are forbidden by the law while others aren't. What the professors do isn't forbidden. So it's a moral question, perhaps something like this: "do I look after myself and my family or do I endanger my capability do it, to follow new rules that sound unfair from my perspective, while I know that this attit…
/r/MensRights08/05/18 04:06 PM
3

Why on earth do you think that in the Nordic countries nobody can be better than any others?There are billionaires, after all, over there, and very successful artists. The startup scene is among the best in Europe etc. Ignorance?
/r/MensRights08/05/18 03:45 PM
24

These people who fight masculinity are so unbelievably ignorant. It's like their whole worldview was formed by other ignorant people. If not, how on earth would you think that masculinity is about violence against the weak, uncontrollable rage, white supremacy and other totally crazy ideas you'll find behind the links in the article? Apparently it has never crossed their minds that masculinity serves many important functions, like creating and upholding the western civilization, more democratic,…
/r/MensRights08/05/18 01:29 PM
10

Actually, rich people don't want their kids in schools where there are only other rich kids. That's because then the talented but not so rich wouldn't be there help the rich kids. Any university can only have so many rich but stupid kids before the quality starts to drop.
/r/MensRights08/05/18 12:54 PM
1

English searches work, though not particularly well. In other languages it sucks. Then again, I've only tried it a few times with a few languages.
/r/MensRights08/05/18 09:51 AM
22

This is happening in all fields girls tend to prefer. Among veterinarians the gap is even bigger. Face to face contact with people or animals whom they can help is perhaps the strongest motivation. But not there alone. Girls tend to get the education they want more often than boys because the school system discriminates against boys, and girls get higher grades.
/r/MensRights08/05/18 09:43 AM
1

Farrell failed to mention that in the video I mentioned, BTW (from aroun 20 min onwards). Anyway, the results are confusing. If the father is in jail, why doesn't that have an effect on the income? And if it does, why doesn't it explain the shortening? And can it be true that a divorce and the subsequent disappearance of the father isn't at all as stressfull as incarceration? Sounds strange.
/r/MensRights08/05/18 08:43 AM
7

The sentences are often ridiculously harsh and long in the USA. For example in the Nordic countries the maximum sentence for rape is around ten years but the actual years behind the bars much less. There is a discussion going on that the punishments are too light. But then again the light sentences prevent anything like this from happening.
/r/MensRights08/05/18 05:04 AM
1

At least these people seem to think it's fine milestone, though stillmore women are (apparently) needed. “We are very encouraged by the growing number of women enrolling in US medical schools,” Darrell G. Kirch, MD, CEO and president of the Association of American Medical Colleges, said in a statement. “This year’s matriculating class demonstrates that medicine is an increasingly attractive career for women and that medical schools are creating an inclusive environment.” Kirch added that there’s…
/r/MensRights08/05/18 04:38 AM
2

The more there are women the more tax money the system will cost because more doctors must be educated, hired, and trained.
/r/MensRights08/05/18 04:25 AM
2

One reason must be that people, not just women, tend to think that men's rights are anti-women. And advertisers don't like that. And if they don't like it the owners must do something, like prevent the paper from publishing anything about men's rights. In short it's about protecting the brand to make money. But that isn't the whole story because outlets like the BBC and NPR are also very Feminist and often anti-men. So, the employees have a say on that, too. In other words, they don't have to be…
/r/MensRights08/05/18 04:15 AM
1

This was an anecdote. It could be that small men get yelled at the most, or young people, or unattractive women etc. if somebody made a study. But because it paints women as oppressed the folks are happy to believe it. There are so few stories "proving" that the myth of oppressed women is true.
/r/MensRights07/05/18 06:29 PM
45

Not my Bing. On the other hand, my Google doesn't suggest anything when I write: why men are so. Or women. The word orders changes the results.
/r/MensRights07/05/18 05:53 PM
2

I took a walk through the town and listened to it. Lots of talk about rough and tumble between fathers and children and how it teaches kids empathy and even delayed gratification (though that part seemed a bit far fetched). A dramatic point was that fatherless children - and particularly boys - have shorter telomeres ( those things that will kill you if they get short enough). I liked the part about how families should have narratives about where the "unit" came from, where it's going and what's…
/r/MensRights07/05/18 04:04 PM
8

When I was young and pretty girls and women said gross things in places like schools, elevators and, of course, bars. I'm under the impression that they do it even more nowadays - but what do I know, old, ugly man.
/r/MensRights07/05/18 12:45 PM
-5

Then again nobody knows how Google's algorithms work, not even Google itself. Though they naturally know more than the rest of us whom they tell very little. What we do know is that there are thousands of employees who tweak the results based on secret rules. Soon they're gonna change the name to Godle. But until that happens I'm with you: making men feel bad can't be high on their list of priorities.
/r/MensRights07/05/18 11:54 AM
3

Freud already knew that an important task of fathers is to teach the kids how to deal with the outside world where the all-loving mother isn't present. That means empathy but also competitiveness, guts, fearlessness and things like that. And if you think Freud is passe, Roy Baumeister has also talked about this pretty essential task. That's not to say that fatherless children are doomed to fail. Obama, for example, did pretty well (though I don't know for sure if there wasn't a man around during…
/r/MensRights07/05/18 07:31 AM
7

You should be surprised because it's mostly a US thing. There live men in other countries, too, believe it or not, and they become much less often mass murderers. The question is not why young men shoot but what could be done in the USA so that mentally ill young men were given help. Talking about patriarchy or blaming young men in general isn't helpful, but, then again, is it ever?
/r/MensRights07/05/18 05:48 AM
15

Probably the most damaging is the education gap, at least in some countries. Then there is the fact that single men seldom can rent a flat if there are women who want to rent it too. This tells a lot about the stereotypes people have. Those are on important reason why men are worse off on average.
/r/MensRights07/05/18 05:35 AM
8

Are there any decent studies trying to prove that men are more privileged than women? It seems something very hard to prove because on average men are doing worse than women and they are discriminated agains in many ways.
/r/MensRights07/05/18 04:25 AM
2

It's been studied: in colleges where the majority is male women are treated better. That's because men compete over who's the nicest guy. And perhaps because men tend to be pretty civil around women on average anyways?
/r/MensRights06/05/18 08:01 PM
6

Not particularly rigorous but definitely worth reading. The simple truth is that people tend to gravitate toward things that come naturally to them if they are given the freedom to choose. There's nothing that can change it. Some women are excellent leaders but most leaders are going to be men. Some men are excellent nurses but most nurses - and even doctors - are going to be women (but not surgeons).
/r/MensRights06/05/18 07:36 PM
0

Perhaps about 10% of Feminist hate men. Then there are perhaps something like 50 % who despise or look down on men. The rest are just ignorant.
/r/MensRights06/05/18 05:55 PM
15

The narrative of all cults make the believers blind to facts.
/r/MensRights06/05/18 11:55 AM
6

And a fake penis. There are women who hate the idea of having sex with another woman. Really, there are. So, this was a crime because there was a victim. But was there a victim in the story the OP posted?
/r/MensRights06/05/18 09:02 AM
10

Based on this discrepancy, if attorneys for the Bohra can show a gendered or religious double standard in existing law, the ramifications will be not be small. Either male circumcision will have to be restricted in some way, or “minor” forms of FGM permitted. The outcome either way will be explosive. Is this true? I'm probably wrong but isn't common law what judges decide it to be? Surely there must be all kinds of decision by judges that favor women?
/r/MensRights06/05/18 04:10 AM
3

627 readers The "actual" Feminist subreddits wouldn't allow that kind of a discussion. AND they don't have ads, which means that they aren't real. Real Feminist subrteddits are not deemed offensive and have ads.
/r/MensRights06/05/18 03:47 AM
99

"Even the UN". :D They aren't any better compared to all kinds of "good causes". It's always about women and children, almost never about boys and men.
/r/MensRights05/05/18 06:32 PM
32

BEHAR: Boys benefit from having girls in their midst. I'm not that sure girls benefit from having boys in their midst. She's feminazi, pure and simple. You couldn't ever say anything like that about girls - or anybody nowadays except for boys. But you could say something like that in the 1930s about the Jews or "niggers" or "chinks". What can girls learn from boys? Is it possible that evolution didn't create any good traits in boys - that girls could learn from? Make them stop that show! It's pu…
/r/MensRights05/05/18 07:50 AM
4

According to adaption statistics both women and men want daughters. But perhaps she lives in a different world, being African Goddess and all.
/r/MensRights05/05/18 06:11 AM
1

Why don't they let 10-year-olds play with adults? Women have weaker bones and muscles - as do kids. Why didn't the article address this basic difference? And men know this instinctively and avoid rough contact.
/r/MensRights03/05/18 11:27 AM
6

Feminists seem to think that the more women control men the better: mansplaining, mannspreading, #metoo (concentrating solely on men's behavior). It seems to be their big plan and it's based on a hostile interpretation of masculinity (among other crazy things).
/r/MensRights03/05/18 11:14 AM
6

learn some basic Gender Studies 101 LOL. ignorance is wisdom.
/r/MensRights03/05/18 10:40 AM
3

It's unlikely that this has to do with what you posted. Perhaps somebody has hijacked your account and is using it for spamming?
/r/MensRights02/05/18 07:47 AM
2

What!!!? Patriarchy is a fringe theory. Ask any credible social scientist or humanist. Nobody takes the theory seriously if they aren't feminists. (Yes, there have been patriarchal societies and perhaps there still are in the marginal, but that has nothing to do with what has been going on in places like Sweden.) In western countries women are better off, no question about that. Power is a bit more complicated, but if we assume that it's markets and democracy which yield power, then any sane, ed…
/r/MensRights01/05/18 02:55 PM
5

"Patriarchy" is a fringe theory. a fringe theory spreading hate. Pretending it's something worth considering benefits haters.
/r/MensRights01/05/18 01:19 PM
21

Lifeline said it did not necessarily agree with Clementine Ford's views on men. "I'm a man and I have suicidal thoughts." "Unfortunately we haven't decided if that's a good or bad thing. Could you call call us again next year, so we'll have time to decide if we're a Feminist organization or not." I understand that there are all kinds of crazy people belonging to all kinds of crazy cults, but treating them as if they were sane isn't right. It isn't right even for the crazy people, confirming thei…
/r/MensRights01/05/18 04:06 AM
5

“That is a crazy situation, and one that is grossly unfair. I would have thought those who are currently campaigning for equal rights for men and women throughout society would be jumping up and down about this. This is not an expensive vaccine, after all, and it will undoubtedly save lives.” People are so delusional, thinking that the powerful people who are campaigning for equal rights would actually care about equality.
/r/MensRights30/04/18 06:48 AM
1

This has been going on for millions or years and we all are decedents of those males who succeeded to become powerful enough to get females interested. So, the competition and desire to dominate (and co-operate) has become part of our bodies and minds biologically. The male hormones, for example, lure us to do and want what makes women horny - even when we want to fight those wants and needs.
/r/MensRights30/04/18 05:47 AM
1

An epidemic of loneliness may await them, but they can be the generation to end it. Perhaps but ... when I read all these articles about how boys are falling behind, getting marginalized, isolated, policed, and punished a thought creeps into my mind: the war is over and the feminists won.
/r/MensRights29/04/18 02:29 PM
7

I just read about a study finding that women prefer men who have hair around and between their nipples compared to men who don't. In other words, that hair is a secondary sexual characteristic and that's why it didn't disappear when almost all other hair did. Not that this would have much to do with the strip, just that it's a strange world - and men should keep their bodily hair hidden. Or shave it off.
/r/MensRights28/04/18 01:24 PM
17

The age of consent in England and Wales is 16, so, is it a rape if he consented?
/r/MensRights28/04/18 11:21 AM
0

I didn't know there was an accent called English. Hmm ...
/r/MensRights28/04/18 11:17 AM
1

Worrying about this kind of hatred toward men is going to drain your resources. There's so much of it. If you, as a young person, want to concentrate on having a good life, ignore it.
/r/MensRights28/04/18 09:23 AM
1

Strangely there are hundreds of occupations where achieving gender parity could take zillion years - teachers, psychologists etc, etc. - and nobody ever talks about these things.
/r/MensRights27/04/18 06:31 PM
3

Yah, women are treated most of the time better.
/r/MensRights27/04/18 02:55 PM
2

I don't believe everything at face value that comes from political think tanks. But anyway, I wonder why they just don't increase the number of board members and then hire a few secretaries, or someone like that, who know that what the deal is: a little money for showing up and perhaps making coffee.
/r/MensRights27/04/18 02:52 PM
1

Or anybody else.
/r/MensRights27/04/18 07:42 AM
10

How is this the other side of #metoo? The other side could be the men who get treated unfairly because of the frenzy. Or the men who get sexually harassed but won't get heard. But this is prostitution, the oldest profession, as the saying goes.
/r/MensRights27/04/18 07:37 AM
0

Nazis were indoctrinated but the world would have been spared from a lot of suffering if people had fought their ideas more furiously after they started talking about the Jews the way they did. At least we should try to not let hateful people get away just because they are young..
/r/MensRights27/04/18 07:18 AM
7

I din't notice anything about child trafficking. But the article describes well the sentiments that will lead to a much more lenient conviction for her compared to the male perpetrator. Like the expert says: If I were the prosecutor here, I would want to understand how she got pulled into this world, and what kind of trauma, if any, she experienced. Perhaps women should be seen as the people without agency. And men, in a situation like this, should be seen as the people who make up their minds t…
/r/MensRights27/04/18 05:57 AM
7

Yeah, I agree.
/r/MensRights26/04/18 08:51 AM
62

Aren't those probably written by politically motivated reporters (often in politically biased media outlets) who won't change their views just because somebody says they are wrong? I don't personally have any good experiences with these kind of journalists when it comes to facts.
/r/MensRights26/04/18 07:31 AM
56

If it's a club that only approves female customers, it could work. There are, of course, such clubs in Finland and they have all kinds of real estates where they can invite whomever they want. An interesting twist is that, though she owns the island, she can't ban men or anybody from entering it because there is this law called Every man's right (Freedom to roam) unless she makes the whole island into a big yard or scatter buildings all around the shores of the island..
/r/MensRights25/04/18 06:17 PM
20

The Australian Defence Force's job advertisement said the Army was searching for a combat soldier capable of being able to 'seek out and close with the enemy, to kill or capture him, to seize and hold ground, repel attack, by day or by night, regardless of season weather or terrain'. They forgot to say what they'd do if it's a female enemy. But I'd guess they are ordered help her to carry her gear back to safety.
/r/MensRights25/04/18 06:37 AM
3

The again, if a leopard attacks you just have to outrun the guy next to you. So, it makes sense to go by that tree with a woman.
/r/MensRights25/04/18 06:26 AM
0

I'm not a professional programmer but does anybody make anything nowadays without using another persons' code? I mean, I'm not saying that copying a whole program and just tweaking the code here and there should win, but then again every participant was probably using somebody else's code. Probably most of the code in every application was written by somebody else, no?
/r/MensRights25/04/18 06:21 AM
10

Yeah, just upload it to your Android phone and execute. It makes women win every time. A true killer app for men.
/r/MensRights25/04/18 06:13 AM
14

And it's not just the UN. Usually "gender equality" is a code word for trying to help women or even strengthen their privileges. The EU, USA, WEF, almost any country ...
/r/MensRights24/04/18 08:26 AM
2

One of the basic facts about any UN statistics is that the numbers can't be reliable nor valid most of the time. Most people in the world live in places where it's very hard to get any reliable statistics about the people. And often nobody even tries to collect relevant data because there's no money, it's too dangerous, corrupted officials invent the figures or it's considered impossible to begin with etc. Even in developed countries surveys have huge problems particularly if they try to study a…
/r/MensRights24/04/18 08:10 AM
6

And when businesses or institutions do it they're against diversity and doomed to fail. Diversity, after all breeds innovation and all kinds of other good things. But I'm pretty sure the idea is to say that bringing in more women is a good things. Bringing in more men is a bad thing, unless they belong to certain minorities. A lot of women are really experiencing a world that in many respects was built by men This world was mostly build by businesses for customers. A typical home is thus build m…
/r/MensRights24/04/18 05:19 AM
43

Yes, but I didn't find this surprising. There are many studies and everyday situations that show that people in general value higher what's good for women.
/r/MensRights23/04/18 01:02 PM
33

Patriarchy is a fringe theory that almost never get mentioned in credible academic publications (outside political academic circles). Now a magazine that has "science" in its name treats it as it were a legitime explanation of the world! (Mental note to myself: never read this magazine.)
/r/MensRights22/04/18 05:07 PM
1

Why does he say he trusts those women who "detect creeps"? I mean, he could be right - though I believe he's wrong, in the sense that the first impression was right if you meet socially awkward men, like those who have Asperger. But why is it important to say that women have the right to judge men they don't know and get believed? Perhaps it's about being a son of a single mother. Those guys are sometimes the worse Feminists. But it's probably also about the need Feminists have to police men, th…
/r/MensRights22/04/18 01:42 PM
11

Middle-aged men can have problems - though it's unlikely - but they shouldn't be taken seriously because according to the narrative I believe in middle-aged men are the root cause of all evil and are so privileged that it makes me cry. (This is the attitude that prevents the society from helping middle-aged men.)
/r/MensRights22/04/18 09:22 AM
4

This is obviously r/menkampf/ stuff. But I still want to say that it's bullshit that you can keep safe by staying at home. If you're rich and some immoral bitch wants to get your money by saying you raped her ten years ago the only way you can be safe is by being able to prove what you did and didn't do ten years ago. Or last night, for that matter.
/r/MensRights22/04/18 09:06 AM
5

Women are liked more and seen as victims even when they are privileged. Thus (western) societies tend to take much better care of them compared to boys and men, who are seen as disposable and capable of taking care of themselves. This along with feminisms which utilizes this attitude is something that will eventually rip the fabric of the society apart. Education is a good example. Boys are doing much worse, and have been for ages, but still the society is concentrating on helping girls to get a…
/r/MensRights22/04/18 06:07 AM
1

A bot that calls somebody an asshole!?
/r/MensRights21/04/18 09:39 PM
0

Men also know how men can be shamed. But, on the other hand, my experience is that men don't use Feminist tactics, shame other men sexually. Am I wrong?
/r/MensRights21/04/18 09:36 PM
1

Perhaps sexual shaming, then, is not a feminist but a female way of thinking. :)
/r/MensRights21/04/18 09:07 PM
1

There have been cults in which women were expected to have sex with the alpha male. But to call them sex slaves sounds wrong. A slave is somebody who has been forced to a position and can't get out without killing herhimself. (I just happened to read a history magazine telling that slaves killed themselves at such a rate in the Roman empire that they had to start to improve their conditions). The women in question were - perhaps - lured by their ape feelings. But slaves!?
/r/MensRights21/04/18 08:39 PM
-1

Sounds very unlikely. I wouldn't be surprised if it turned out that there were no "sex slaves". The guardian likes the idea but I don't think that there have been sex slaves in an organized way since the abolition of slavery.
/r/MensRights21/04/18 07:47 PM
1

LOL, that's not going to happen. Sometimes you can choose the gender but even that is nowadays often banned because almost everyone chose girls. Sometimes parents have sex and have a child but that is definitely going out of fashion, so ... my advice is simply to learn to live alone. It's not that bad, they tell me.
/r/MensRights21/04/18 06:56 PM
8

A strange appearance of Feminist argumentation, sexual shaming tactics, in the middle of something that could be a rational discussion.
/r/MensRights21/04/18 06:43 PM
3

A great summary of the book's take on the issue!
/r/MensRights21/04/18 06:35 PM
50

Perhaps not raped because he would be an outcast, far below those who get raped. But, yeah, "criminal personalities" tend to have very intolerant attitudes towards those who have harmed women or children. I wonder if there are any good studies on that. Why do men who commit sometimes horrendous crimes still think that harming women is something that is far below what they have done? It's like the last bastion of decency, no?
/r/MensRights21/04/18 06:24 PM
20

Allowing stupid, uneducated people write about the world and get published is ... something that the mainstream media is good at. Stupid people tend to think that people do thinks differently because there are essential differences between groups (this link might explain it but I'm not sure because I just googled it and din't read: http://www.apa.org/science/about/psa/2005/05/gelman.aspx) Stupid people also contribute different outcomes to differences in the abilities of different individuals wi…
/r/MensRights21/04/18 01:16 PM
3

There was this book critic in a perfectly legit literature magazine who often added to his reviews of books written by women something like: this time the male characters are awful because ... (and then something about what the male characters were). I thought it was funny because that was the exact reason why I had stopped reading books written by women. They just couldn't omit their contempt when they wrote novels.
/r/MensRights21/04/18 12:46 PM
2

Perhaps the main reason why women are usually treated better than men is that they look attractive in the eyes of both men and women. But if being attractive doesn't work for you, become ugly. It isn't that difficult.
/r/MensRights21/04/18 08:04 AM
2

Most of the time female criminals say that they were molested because it gives them benefits, perhaps even freedom. A psychiatrist who works in prisons and asylums one told that female murderers, almost always say that they killed because they were sexually abused. After the conviction they can tell to the psychiatrist the real reason, like "I just couldn't stand him", "I thought I could benefit economically". It's like there was a code of conduct for female criminals saying: always blame men an…
/r/MensRights21/04/18 07:56 AM
9

It's apparently an American thing that only a small majority of new dentist are women. In Europe dentists tend to be far more often women.
/r/MensRights21/04/18 06:42 AM
3

There was a big cultural shift when the baby boomers got into colleges and politics in the sixties and seventies. There were all kinds of "emancipations" going on. Men were supposed to have long hair if they wanted, women were supposed to use whatever clothes they wanted to. "Free love" (mostly alpha males fuckin women) reigned for the first time. "The pill", by the way, was perhaps the biggest reason why young people felt that they could abandon the culture of their parents. Anyway, feminism wa…
/r/MensRights21/04/18 06:27 AM
1

I don't know if that's true in a prison.
/r/MensRights21/04/18 06:03 AM
3

The same report says that the majority of the staff who does these kinds of things are women. I find it interesting because it seems to challenge everything we think we know about sexual assaults (and by "we" I refer to the people who get their worldview from the media - news, movies and so on - and feminist-minded academic works.)
/r/MensRights21/04/18 05:56 AM
1

Is it possible that the female prisoners get raped or otherwise sexually assaulted by male prisoners or does that mean that it's other female prisoners who do that?
/r/MensRights21/04/18 05:12 AM
3

In the USA the law doesn't tell what are the minimum and maximum sentences for each crime then?
/r/MensRights21/04/18 04:50 AM
3

He also stresses how much more he likes women. I've never thought that I like one sex over the other. But, come to think of it, my best friends have always been male.
/r/MensRights21/04/18 04:43 AM
2

Why would you adopt a boy? Women almost never do if they can choose.
/r/MensRights21/04/18 04:40 AM
3

I hope there's a good lawyer behind this. Otherwise it sounds like a catastrophe waiting to happen. Collecting, let alone publishing, registers like that are outright illegal in many countries.
/r/MensRights20/04/18 08:08 AM
2

Sounds like a fabrication: "pretty bad", "vegetable".
/r/MensRights20/04/18 08:05 AM
3

"Overall, the judges and the laypeople both saw the woman's case as having more merit than the man's," Miller said. "But the more the judges supported traditional gender roles, the more likely they were to rule against a woman plaintiff on the merits. In other words, decisions in the woman's discrimination case were influenced by the judges' personal ideologies about the proper roles for men and women." It's hard to know for sure what she means but I'd guess that if a judge has traditional views…
/r/MensRights20/04/18 06:45 AM
2

I think I got this from a book written by Kustaa Vilkuna. But unfortunately my memory ain't what it used to be so I'm not sure. :) Google didn't help either. I can't be sure but I believe that this wasn't a Finnish peculiarity but something the censorship applied in many different countries.
/r/MensRights19/04/18 02:16 PM
4

Baumeister: The most thorough research on the question has been that conducted by Alice Eagly and her colleagues. They compiled mountains of data by asking large numbers of people, both men and women, about what traits they associated with men and women. In this age of political correctness, people are somewhat careful about what they say, but across thousands of questionnaires with dozens if not hundreds of ratings on each, one can gradually get an idea of what people really think. And despite …
/r/MensRights19/04/18 09:02 AM
13

Baumeister: One of the most interesting books about gender in recent years was by Norah Vincent. She was a lesbian feminist who with some expert help could pass for a man, and so she went undercover, living as a man in several different social spheres for the better part of a year. The book, Self-Made Man, is her memoir. She is quite frank that she started out thinking she was going to find out how great men have it and write a shocking feminist expose of the fine life that the enemy (men) was e…
/r/MensRights19/04/18 08:27 AM
6

Baumeister: The preference for boy babies is an interesting case, particularly to me because early in my career, I used to lecture about this in connection with prejudice against girls and women. The research fi nding I read when I was writing my fi rst lectures back in 1979 was that parents were more likely to have another child if their fi rst or previous child had been a girl than a boy. The explanation given at that time was that parents really want sons, and so if they have a girl, they reg…
/r/MensRights19/04/18 08:02 AM
14

Baumeister: The business of feminism was aptly summarized by Daphne Patai and Noretta Koertge, two scholars who have spent their careers in Women’s Studies programs and who wrote a thoughtful book, Professing Feminism, on what passes for scholarly activity in those departments. Crucially, they pointed out that most feminists do not pay any attention to criticisms from non-feminists. They listen a little bit to criticism from each other—but that mainly concerns the purity of their commitment to f…
/r/MensRights19/04/18 07:53 AM
18

Baumeister: Several years ago, when I first began to give talks about how culture uses men, a fellow came up to me after a major speech. He identified himself as a group therapist who had been conducting all-male group therapy sessions for more than twenty years. He said something that has stuck with me ever since. In all those years of men’s groups, he had never once heard any group of men talk about women as the enemy. It wasn’t that there was no talk of women—on the contrary, men talked endle…
/r/MensRights19/04/18 07:41 AM
7

Baumeister: It’s not that men are smarter than women (the first theory). It’s not that men are wicked conspirators against women (the second theory). It’s about some basic likes and dislikes. It’s rooted in how men treat other men, and how that is different from the way women relate to other women. It’s about how culture works. Due to an accident that just happened to be lucky for men, culture grew out of the way the men related to each other, more than out of women’s relationships. There were c…
/r/MensRights19/04/18 07:30 AM
4

Perhaps. Yeah, of course I got the joke but there is obviously a link between mentioning suicides and jumping out of the window. And because the story doesn't tell what took place ...
/r/MensRights19/04/18 07:24 AM
8

Did he commit suicide because his boss looked disappointed?
/r/MensRights19/04/18 07:15 AM
26

This pretty funny picture starts the book. And here are the opening paragraphs: I S THERE ANYTHING GOOD ABOUT MEN? The question is provocative today, because hardly anyone dares to suggest that men are superior to women in any respect. Political correctness permits us to say that women are better than men at one thing or another. But it’s mostly taboo even to suggest men are better at anything more important than opening jars and killing bugs. In this book, I develop a somewhat radical theory ab…
/r/MensRights19/04/18 07:03 AM
1

There are still two socialist paradises: Cuba and North Korea. Why not move there.
/r/MensRights19/04/18 04:14 AM
1

It won't, it has been tested already.
/r/MensRights18/04/18 07:09 PM
1

I read a book about psychopaths. It claimed that Neil Armstrong was one. They were measuring his heartbeat when the Apollo lander was seconds away from crashing and he was steering it. His heartbeat slowed down. Perhaps we should send psychopaths to Mars.
/r/MensRights18/04/18 02:10 PM
0

If they have an objective test or criteria and the man is clearly better, then they have to choose the man. But I'm pretty sure they don't have such tests. They'll end up with a group of people, some of them women, who all have what it takes. This opinion is based on the great movie "The Right Stuff". Why don't they show it anymore anywhere?
/r/MensRights18/04/18 02:03 PM
4

The first time I truly was discriminated against was when I, at 19, had to spend 11 months in the military while the girls my age spend the time travelling around the world, working and saving money and studying for entrance examinations.
/r/MensRights18/04/18 01:48 PM
2

A giant leap for the womankind. And why not if they find somebody who has what it takes.
/r/MensRights18/04/18 01:27 PM
6

In Finland, during the WWII, the censors forbid publishing any stories involving extreme female suffering. The newspapers could tell that so and so many women were killed during a raid, for example. They were not allowed to tell any "graphic" stories about their suffering. Of course there were no such restrictions regarding men. The stories of heroic - but often awful - deaths were acceptable even encouraged. Stories of battles where perhaps hundreds or thousands of men were killed were commonpl…
/r/MensRights18/04/18 08:14 AM
1

Stop immigration an the last Finn will be born in 2063. Who cares, if a nation has the least equal education (according to PISA) and does nothing and instead regards it as the "crown jewel", that nation deserves to disappear.
/r/MensRights18/04/18 07:52 AM
1

Boys, if you are interested in sex, get some muscle - or become Jim Morrison.
/r/MensRights18/04/18 04:28 AM
5

It's nice that they trust men more than women to be tolerant.
/r/MensRights18/04/18 04:17 AM
0

On average men are more intelligent (get a little better results from IQ tests). But because the Bell curve of men is steeper there are more stupid men- but also, on the other end, more brilliant men. Men have bigger brains, after all. But on the individual level this is meaningless, as are all averages.
/r/MensRights18/04/18 04:05 AM
38

Chilling. It's like from a horror movie.
/r/MensRights17/04/18 04:54 PM
1

LOL
/r/MensRights17/04/18 03:03 PM
2

And not only a woman but a left-handed albino psychopath from Niger.
/r/MensRights17/04/18 10:44 AM
3

This was about a double standard not about a crazy generalization. My problem is this: why is there so much bashing of men by women and so little bashing of women by men? It could be that men despise women less than vice versa because of Feminism and other reasons. But it could be because of a double standard that allows women something that it doesn't allow men. The strange thing is that, though I've bee pondering this imbalance for ages, this simple truth hasn't entered the equation. Why is th…
/r/MensRights17/04/18 10:37 AM
1

Well, money doesn't grow in trees unless you raise it first.
/r/MensRights17/04/18 08:19 AM
5

On the other hand, it could be a clever Feminist who made the poster. There are without any doubt Feminists who want to spread fear and mistrust, even hatred. Some of them might know that there are women for whom hating men isn't easy. They might have a loving father, for example. The approach here could be spreading hate and mistrust jokingly. No?
/r/MensRights17/04/18 08:14 AM
1

There's nothing wrong with this idea. What, perhaps, is wrong is that men can't "officially" have the luxury of being without women. But we have have all kinds of activities that women avoid, like hiking, fishing, hunting ... getting wasted ... and what have you.
/r/MensRights16/04/18 08:11 PM
2

She's well-connected. This is the third article I've seen,
/r/MensRights16/04/18 07:43 PM
2

Perhaps homosexuality got trendy at the same time when the education gap started to widen. Women found harder and harder to find marriageable men so they wanted to have lesbian marriages as an option. And what women want is what politicians will do. Polyamory is an other way women can cope with the problem. Soon we'll have men with many wives.
/r/MensRights15/04/18 05:00 PM
0

Oh dear. We can’t have that now can we? The USA is not perfect, but God, I wish in Europe we had the First Amendment, which does actually guarantee you your inherent right to “say almost anything”. Bullshit. Just check the The Press Freedom Index. Anyways, what does this has to do with anything related to this sub?
/r/MensRights14/04/18 07:41 PM
0

What is this doing in this sub?
/r/MensRights14/04/18 07:35 PM
13

https://i.imgur.com/Ca60PBu.jpg
/r/MensRights14/04/18 06:35 AM
5

The next headline in NYT I'd like to see: Sexual Power! What Tinder and sleeping with men taught me about sex as a woman compared to men. But that's not going to happen, I guess.
/r/MensRights13/04/18 08:24 AM
2

I'm planning to print this and hang it on the toilet wall.
/r/MensRights12/04/18 07:08 PM
21

Very US-centric. If the "experts" spent even an hour studying what's going on in other countries they would realize that their "theories" must be flawed. Then again and as always, these kind of "experts" don't care about the reality. For them the truth is what is politically useful to their cause.
/r/MensRights12/04/18 05:05 AM
1

How can an average earnings gap have any effect on individuals (except for the hatred and worry and false ideas that these campaigns create). The picture seems to be from Youtube.
/r/MensRights11/04/18 10:49 AM
1

The study is about the pay gap, that's usually not the same as wage gap: But I didn't read the study so I don't know if they are talking about the negotiated fixed wages or earnings (wages plus extras).
/r/MensRights11/04/18 08:44 AM
3

There will be always hard battles unless catastrophes, crime, entrepreneurial competition, scientific breakthroughs, going to Mars, saving the planet etc stops.
/r/MensRights11/04/18 08:28 AM
3

There are lots of countries where the shared custody is the rule. I don't know if it has increased divorces, though.
/r/MensRights10/04/18 08:15 PM
1

Nope, it's true, you just didn't read carefully.
/r/MensRights09/04/18 04:28 PM
1

The picture is very good as a satire of the crazy narrative we tend to live by. One thing seems almost right, though: the woman at the top is sweating while the man isn't. And, indeed, women climbing towards the top often feel more stressed than men. All the competition and risk-taking that is needed don't suit on average women and their hormones as well as they suit men.
/r/MensRights09/04/18 04:04 PM
2

Not fucking plus recording then.
/r/MensRights09/04/18 06:32 AM
9

This is how everyone ends up not ever fucking again. Not fucking isn't safe either.
/r/MensRights08/04/18 04:14 PM
23

Rather, he didn't follow the contract. The only thing that is totally safe is recording everything you do.
/r/MensRights08/04/18 04:13 PM
7

If you had to send your child back in time, say 200, 500, 2000 years, would you send that child back as a girl or a boy? I would send as a girl, no doubt about it. When very few had decent lives, women at least had the "luxury" of pretty safe and happy family life when men toiled on fields and often had to fight for their lives and for the lives of their families.
/r/MensRights07/04/18 05:26 PM
241

Most young people, girls in particular, don't know how the world works between men and women because we don't tell them. Instead we offer this vague feminist narrative full of holes and lies. Contempt and even hatred.
/r/MensRights07/04/18 05:09 PM
2

Isn't violence just one form of aggression? Isn't aggression again one of the emotions that every thinking living thing needs to survive? You often have to feel aggressive in a situation where violence might be needed.
/r/MensRights07/04/18 03:27 PM
1

http://knowyourmeme.com/memes/how-can-she-slap
/r/MensRights07/04/18 09:20 AM
1

Pretty extreme wrongthink there - and wrongvote. No wonder it all got censored (didn't it?).
/r/MensRights07/04/18 09:14 AM
3

In the nineties I read an article in a leftists/feminist/green paper about a serial killer. She described his traits and added "a typical man, in other words". Right there and then I decided that there's something wrong with a movement that allows that kind of ideas in its tribune. I'm a man. Something very, very wrong. Later on I realized that hating men is OK in those circles.
/r/MensRights06/04/18 07:37 PM
5

When women are unfairly favored it must have some effect on the attitudes among men - and women. Anything else would be insane.
/r/MensRights06/04/18 04:52 PM
1

Ganz so!
/r/MensRights06/04/18 12:40 PM
3

And why do young women earn more than young men, or lesbians more than gays, or unmarried women more than unmarried men? The scheme that the patriarchy has created is very hard to understand. Why do we let some female groups earn more than similar male groups? And, come to think of it, why do we let many women earn more than many men in general? That was sarcasm. Of course the pay gap is a political concept designed to give more money to women. The idea that we take two different groups and dema…
/r/MensRights06/04/18 12:11 PM
4

I'm reading Homo Deus: A Brief History of Tomorrow by Yuval Noah Harari. At times it's pretty good, even excellent. One of his main points is that people are superior to any other animals because we can create and share narratives. They don't have to be based on facts as long as we believe in them and they let us aim at common goals. I've been thinking for a long time that the "feminist narrative" exists, not because it's true heh, no sane people think that the feminist narrative is true. But, a…
/r/MensRights06/04/18 07:08 AM
2

Women are far less represented in almost anything remarkable or newsworthy. That's a strange fact that is seldom talked about.
/r/MensRights05/04/18 04:31 PM
0

Just to clarify what I meant, here are a couple of reasons why women earn less than men; 1) Women give birth to children are interested in children more - or differently - than men are - and people let them. 2) Women tend to work in service branches and particularly tax-paid services whose productivity has risen slower. 3) Women work less, which is the most important reason.
/r/MensRights05/04/18 03:57 PM
1

I'd say that the differences are so small that there's no use trying to guess what causes them. But then again I don't understand the lower graph (the graph seems to say that the highest paid women in Sweden earn more than the highest paid men which is against everything I think I know about the jobs market).
/r/MensRights05/04/18 03:37 PM
14

Isn't the BBC (whom they mention) saying the same as any mainstream media outlet when faced with these kind of facts: Everybody else is discriminating against women but we pay according to the productivity (AKA supply and demand).
/r/MensRights05/04/18 12:49 PM
3

One of the strangest things is that people think, our Big narrative" tells, that men hate women but refuse to believe that many women hate men. Hell, they have a movement that aims at hating men. But not only that. Few men seem to know this but one of the most popular topics women speak about when no men are around is contempt or even hatred towards men. Not all women of course.
/r/MensRights05/04/18 12:34 PM
8

I remember a guy who decided to become a feminist because he worked as a conductor in a tram and notices that most of the adult passengers were female. He, being a brilliant wannabe feminist, decided that it was because men didn't allow women drive cars. I suggested that it, perhaps, was because women tend to work in service jobs which, believe it or not tend to be along the tram, bus and metro lines. Besides, many men avoid travelling in packed trams because they don't want to be close to child…
/r/MensRights04/04/18 03:43 PM
2

6) Remember that the western civilization is without a doubt the best civilization - particularly for women - the humankind has created and its foundations were built mostly by men. Not all men are hitlers, there are also hegels (to stick to German examples) and the majority is, if not brilliant at least, OK: caring, trustworthy, bold, hardworking ... builders of civilizations.
/r/MensRights04/04/18 08:29 AM
1

Thanks foot the support. In the end nothing means something and we're all gonna be dead.
/r/MensRights04/04/18 07:49 AM
2

Girls a taught early on that they should have all kinds of privileges. And guess what, they are right. A young boy dressing up so that his private parts were showing wouldn't be send home but to jail.
/r/MensRights04/04/18 05:40 AM
3

This is crazy. Surely the OP is a feminist trying to discredit the people here?! Why would she otherwise suggest that somebody here would act in so immoral way?
/r/MensRights04/04/18 05:33 AM
2

Dolphins could be the most intelligent group but do we let them debate!? Right after dolphins, some say, are the left-handed people. And whaat about the retired professors! Do we let them debate against teenagers! Yes we do until somebody trustworthy, like a feminist, forbids it.
/r/MensRights04/04/18 05:29 AM
17

It was speculated already somewhere (by a feminist-minded reporter, no doubt) that the incident probably had to do with domestic violence. Indeed! She shot her boyfriend! But that's not what the reporter was thinking, of course.
/r/MensRights04/04/18 05:06 AM
10

I'd use Nazi Germany as an example: People should be stereotyped into classes who then should be a treated differently according to which group they belong to. Certain people should be killed and others, if men, should be used as cannon fodder, for example.
/r/MensRights02/04/18 06:04 PM
3

I seem to remember that Freud was a man, a man with crazy theories but a man nevertheless. I seem to remember that almost all great minds were inside male bodies. And so were the worst minds, like Stalin, Mao or Hitler. There is apparently a trade-off: the "great" people can be great at great as well as horrific things.
/r/MensRights02/04/18 04:01 PM
9

Finally! Young women earn more than young men, unmarried women earn more then unmarried men, homosexual women earn more than homosexual men. Women spend several times more than men. Finally these problems are going to be addressed! Thank god we have feminism!
/r/MensRights02/04/18 03:08 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter