TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

randomu_name Archive

View 1 post and 17 comments by randomu_name on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
18

Discriminationrandomu_name/r/MensRights04/08/17 09:55 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

In fairness though, there is a pretty recent history of lynchings over false accusations as well as a cultural history of falsely accusing black men. That's what To Kill a Mockingbird is about and it's part of American culture.
/r/PussyPassDenied14/11/17 10:44 AM
1

Thanks. Googled it. It actually would mean the opposite of what I intend to convey.
/r/PussyPassDenied14/11/17 02:30 AM
1

And I disagree. I think if an employee acts in an obviously wreckless manner that meaningfully damages an employers reputation or business, they may be within their rights to terminate said employee. I think many companies have gone too far with this, but I don't think one should have to commit a criminal act for it to affect their employment.
/r/PussyPassDenied12/11/17 08:27 PM
1

ahem And that's obviously a problem, but not the same problem as firing someone for who they voted for, which you cannot do, and I have seen no evidence to suggest is happening. The woman in question here did not yell "nigger" though. She told the POTUS to fuck off. and she lost her job because she exercised her right to speak out. Did you miss the part in my first comment where I argued that her firing IMO was illegitimate? My point with the "nigger" story was that I think there are actions out…
/r/PussyPassDenied12/11/17 07:36 PM
2

You cannot be fired for your vote, and I think there is a massive difference between yelling "nigger" at a crowd of people and saying fuck when you're a teacher. You don't have to agree with me but you're creating a false equivalence here.
/r/PussyPassDenied12/11/17 07:01 PM
2

I don't think there is any hard and fast rule one can make about this. I agree with you in general principle, but employers should also have the right to terminate an employee that willfully causes harm to their business through their conduct. I don't personally think this rises to that level and I don't agree that she should be punished for expressing her displeasure with a politician. That's ridiculous in my view no matter what side of politics you're on. But, there are certainly instances of …
/r/PussyPassDenied12/11/17 10:38 AM
1

https://speakerdata2.s3.amazonaws.com/photo/image/783767/Nell-Minow.jpg
/r/MensRights22/10/17 05:02 AM
1

That's called covering your ass. Personally if I were in such a position I would refuse to do the interview without a third party present.
/r/MensRights22/10/17 05:00 AM
28

If previous workplace studies are any indication, men are much better at creating hierarchies and dividing up tasks. Women prefer consensus, which has its place, but it's not as effective when trying to complete complicated tasks efficiently.
/r/MensRights31/08/17 11:06 AM
1

and Silicon Valley has been repeatedly exposed as a place that discriminates against women and people of color No, it's been repeatedly exposed for employing disproportionate numbers of men and people of asian decent. That doesn't translate into discrimination without proof and the claim is libellous.
/r/MensRights07/08/17 02:40 AM
1

It's like the argument against dems and liberals. I don't think I'd go that far. That's a very big tent. Polygon is a single office of people with a specific set of content and history. What do u think can be done for males who are victims of Lynch mobs after unsubstantiated and unproven accusations? I'm not sure, but apologizing if you didn't do it certainly isn't the right route. I don't think ultimately there is anything you can do except get out of town maybe. This is why taboo allegations a…
/r/MensRights06/08/17 10:12 AM
1

You're saying that party kept its nose out of it for political expediency? So there are 3 main parties. The LPC (Trudeau's party) the NDP (the accuser's party) and the CPC (the ruling party but uninvolved in this situation). The NDP wasn't going to question it as it was their MPs that made the accusation, they were going to back them up and make theatre of it for political points. And the CPC was about to go into an election and I think just didn't see any advantage to picking this fight. There …
/r/MensRights06/08/17 09:30 AM
1

Are u saying this since polygon is known for past witch hunts and is known for publishing articles making unsubstantiated accusations against other males? Yes. but wouldn't your attitude be the same attitude that feminists ("There are stories about this male, therefore it must be true.") have? I'm not suggesting that this guy actually did anything wrong, the accusations are flimsy. But if you join an organization that has a history of joining in witch hunts, it shouldn't be shocking that they're…
/r/MensRights06/08/17 09:25 AM
1

That's really stupid. Do u think this is because Canada is very liberal/sjw infested? I think it's because the media is. They barely raised an eyebrow. There were a small number of critical eyebrows raised but at the time the current PM was the head of the 3rd place party and the official opposition party was the one that made the complaint, so they weren't going to talk shit about his response to it, and the party in power was trying to just keep its nose out of it. So it was barely a topic, bu…
/r/MensRights06/08/17 08:51 AM
3

The Prime Minister of Canada dismissed two elected MPs based on unproven, uninvestigated allegations from opposition MPs. By comparison, this is nothing and it's not at all surprising. But in this case he could totally sue over the suspension, especially since it gives the appearance of guilt. The allegations are nebulous, non-specific, from a source of unknown credibility and it's not even clear if they're serious. But look at how little it took for people to condemn Casey Affleck. He was prett…
/r/MensRights06/08/17 04:34 AM
2

This guy no doubt joined in on past witch hunts or at very least allowed people working under him to publish unsubstantiated, salacious articles making such accusations. He got shot with his own gun, so it's hard to feel too badly about his plight. I sincerely hope that people like him learn something from this and how easy it is to be a target of false claims when you let claims go unquestioned or take them on faith and pillory the accused at the drop of a hat.
/r/MensRights06/08/17 04:29 AM
2

Age of consent under 18 is conditional not absolute. In the overwhelming majority of western jurisdictions anyone under 18 cannot consent to sex with an authority figure such as a teacher or employer, caretaker, doctor etc. They also cannot consent to sex for money. In this case this is absolutely a statutory rape. I have never seen a news report featuring a male perpetrator in the same circumstance that called it rape. Then you've been living in a bunker with no internet or television. https://…
/r/MensRights04/08/17 10:16 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter