TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

randomusername1934 Archive

View 0 posts and 224 comments by randomusername1934 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
6

The Misogyny of Male Suicide With one sentence you have activated every bone in my body, and they are all in 'attack mode'.
/r/MensRights13/07/26 09:20 PM
5

Your personal experience is not universal law. It's strange how many people need to hear that, but I guess it must be counterintuitive somehow.
/r/MensRights26/06/26 08:15 PM
44

You know why they're not considered a hate group. Their hate is the kind of hate that's approved of by broader society.
/r/MensRights07/05/26 06:59 AM
6

"the point is that they're using this argument in only ONE direction." What is it about that that surprises you?
/r/MensRights23/04/26 05:49 PM
5

Also the Labour Party "Opinions we don't like are also a form of 'violence against women and girls', even opinions that have nothing to do with women. Give us a few more years and we can redefine every single thing that you do, think, feel (and do not do, do not think, or do not feel) into a form of 'violence against women and girls'! What's that? Our members are collaborating with organised rape gangs motivated by religious and ethnic hatred? Well . . . . that's just a right wing myth (and also…
/r/MensRights19/12/25 07:52 AM
24

This. The most that this policy can possibly hope to achieve is to create a generation of boys utterly consumed by silent hatred for women that they don't talk about - that can only lead to wonderful consequences (especially for the women around them) down the line! It's almost like they're desperately trying to engineer problems for later that they can then use as justification for further funding/action - but that's just getting into 'crazy' and 'conspiratorial' theorizing, which must make it …
/r/MensRights18/12/25 05:13 PM
27

this is like calling people against digital ID pedophiles. You say that as if it was some horrific exaggeration that couldn't possibly happen.
/r/MensRights26/11/25 11:05 PM
12

Morphed into?
/r/MensRights16/11/25 10:47 AM
2

It's a user created database of media tropes, any political bias is the authors rather than the sites, and usually the cause of extensive debate in the chat pages for that trope. If you want to view things in terms of 'allies' and 'enemies' then it's a neutral nation not involved in the war.
/r/MensRights24/08/25 03:32 PM
181

"Why are men struggling – and what can be done about it?" proceeds to recite the mantra that 'men must be taught to cry and show their emotions' as if it were the magic bullet solution to the entire problem I don't know what I was expecting, but I suppose I shouldn't be surprised to see that coming from the BBC.
/r/MensRights08/08/25 07:55 AM
95

Men, for Millennia: approach women in public spaces in order to talk to them Women, suddenly: "Ugh! Stop coming up to us in public! It's scary and evil and you need to stop it!!!!!!" Men: "Duly noted". Vast majority of men stop approaching women in public. Women: "OMG! Why are no men approaching me in public now? Do you all just hate women or something?!?!?!?!?! I BET YOU'RE ALL REALLY SCARED OF ME!". What do you think they expected to happen?
/r/MensRights19/07/25 05:58 PM
268

Modern Dating: Female expectations elevated so far past even just being 'unbelievably over the top' that an increasing number of young men are just checking out of the entire thing because it's just not worth their time anymore. British Government: "Maybe if we keep raising their expectations and raising the cost for men to be in a relationship it will in some way help things?". How much is this guy getting paid to come up with gems like that?
/r/MensRights06/07/25 11:18 AM
2

I'm pretty sure that you need the one before you can have the other, they're related at least.
/r/MensRights22/04/25 06:04 AM
6

Yup, and that certainly sounds like financial abuse to me.
/r/MensRights21/04/25 06:40 AM
7

If we're talking about marriage and 'financial abuse' then why are we not talking exclusively about alimony?
/r/MensRights20/04/25 04:10 PM
31

Even when the Democrats were desperately trying to pander to the male vote in the run up to the last US election their messaging was less "We give a shit about your issues and concerns" and a lot more "A REAL MAN would support 101% of my issues and concerns". I think you're being overly optimistic there, I don't believe that they're actually that calculating or Machiavellian, a lot of them just hate men, or strongly believe in policies and plans that would be bad for men.
/r/MensRights29/03/25 12:59 PM
53

Just bend the knee to the people who hate you That doesn't sound like something that would achieve anything positive.
/r/MensRights29/03/25 10:53 AM
3

All sexes are equal, but some are more equal than others.
/r/MensRights08/03/25 07:44 PM
4

Having a whole special category of crime that makes it - legally - a much more serious offence, with a higher standard of punishment assigned to the assailant, and (in practice) a lower bar for conviction is the literal mark of a specially protected and privileged class. As in if you were to boil down what it meant to be a privileged class that would be pretty near the top of the list. Anybody supporting that kind of set up for any group in society is announcing that they do not give any kind of…
/r/MensRights04/03/25 07:53 PM
2

‘Unlawful’ Sexual Conduct with 17 year old boy. So she's a child rapist?
/r/MensRights01/03/25 07:37 PM
8

I saw that, but it's still helpful to have the story there for the people who don't know it yet.
/r/MensRights02/02/25 05:03 PM
13

I'm going to take a deep breath, count to ten, and limit my response here - but that story is a complete lie. It was never 'legal for a man to beat a woman as long as he used a stick narrower than his thumb'. That was a finding in a domestic abuse case by a bottom circuit magistrate in England in the 18th century. That finding caused national outrage to the point where the House of Lords (UK equivalent to the US Supreme Court at that point) cleared their schedule to hear and review the case. Thi…
/r/MensRights02/02/25 03:31 PM
2

A strange game. The only winning move is not to play.
/r/MensRights01/02/25 09:25 AM
1

Which traits/parts? How/why are they toxic? How are they uniquely and exclusively a part of masculinity? You can't just say "I am right because everyone knows I'm right, and everyone knows that I am right because I say I am right".
/r/MensRights27/01/25 12:13 PM
1

OK, justify your position.
/r/MensRights27/01/25 07:30 AM
16

Why fix it? It's an inherently and unavoidably hateful term. Just drop it, forget it. Anybody using the term seriously is just announcing that they have nothing of value to add to the conversation.
/r/MensRights26/01/25 09:08 AM
17

"If you repeat a lie often enough, eventually people will believe it" (attributed to Geobbels, the Propaganda Minister of the 3rd Reich). There's two possible explanation for what you (and I imagine 99% of the people posting here) have seen. 1: They've been psy-opp'd into actually believing it and genuinely don't understand why you won't just shut up and agree with the authorised TRUTH(tm) 2: They know that they're lying, and that what they're saying makes absolutely no sense, but like what they…
/r/MensRights10/01/25 08:55 PM
16

What do you mean 'slowly' making that word (rapist) lose its meaning? At this point we're only a few years away from every authoritative dictionary defining 'rapist' as 'any person a feminist does not like for any reason (including no reason)'.
/r/MensRights06/01/25 07:20 PM
63

Man has a sexual fantasy his GF/wife doesn't like: "ERMAGERD! PSYCHO RAPIST SEX ABUSER!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!" Woman has a sexual fantasy her BF/husband doesn't like: "Ugh, he's abusing you by restricting your sexuality! Dump that insecure incel loser waste of space and find yourself, queen!" If feminists didn't have double standards they'd have no standards at all.
/r/MensRights06/01/25 07:02 PM
1

Only if you're psychotic enough to believe that 'merit' has a sex bias. N.B. There's no such thing as 'gender', don't play their game.
/r/MensRights01/12/24 04:59 PM
19

Apart from the pay, is there a difference between a loony cult & feminist academia? The average loony cult is perfectly happy to stay in their compound - talk nonsense about whatever it is they believe - and become one of if not the most horrific communities/environments you could possibly live in. The Feminist Academic-Activist-Complex is definitely not happy to stay in their compound though and demands to have its doctrine forced wholesale on the general population through policy and culture. …
/r/MensRights26/11/24 07:38 AM
10

Yup, and literally right up to the outbreak of the war they were conducting a terrorist campaign of bombing and arson, burning down the houses of politicians who weren't supporting their movement and using IEDs to attack infrastructure and members of the public.
/r/MensRights11/11/24 10:01 PM
1

Men’s mental health: why are we are trying to change masculinity rather than create male-friendly services? Gee, do you think it might have something to do with an incredibly well funded and connected 'pressure group' (being as generous as is physically possible) that has - as an unchallengeable, irreducible, and overpowering tenet of its ideology - the idea that men are broken, malicious, and responsible for absolutely everything wrong?
/r/MensRights30/10/24 05:51 PM
3

Glad you liked it, and yeah 'Boys will be Boys' has only ever been used in relation to rape/sexual assault by feminists looking for a way to expand and promote their hatred.
/r/MensRights27/10/24 08:45 PM
1

Fair play bro, and it's never a bad idea to up your game.
/r/MensRights27/10/24 08:09 PM
1

Not trying to get at you, but like I said - that joke needs a very particular audience and vibe to work. and going by what I've seen so far It's not the kind of sub.
/r/MensRights27/10/24 07:35 PM
1

Dude, I can see the joke you were aiming for there - but learn to read the room.
/r/MensRights27/10/24 05:32 PM
5

The 'Rule of Thumb' claim is a perfect example of Feminist lies and bigotry. If you're not familiar with it the story is that it was 'the law' in the 18th century that a British man could beat his wife, so long as he used a stick that was no thicker than his thumb, and that that is where the phrase 'rule of thumb' came from - making that phrase inherently traumatic and offensive to all women everywhere forever. In reality, of course, that was not the case. In reality a man charged with domestic …
/r/MensRights27/10/24 07:58 AM
1

Redefine rape and DV as crimes that can only be committed by a man. In fact go further than that, with the Duluth Model redefine DV so that even if the police arrive at a scene to find a woman in the process of stabbing her husband they are required to immediately define the incident as HIS crime against her. Remove brain. ?????? OMG SO FEW WOMEN COMMIT RAPE!!!!!!!!!!!!! MEN SO VIOLENT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Who's paying you to be this stupid?
/r/MensRights04/09/24 07:40 AM
83

Considering that women make up the absolute minority of the victims of the various forms of violent crime out there their 'feeling unsafe' is not a reflection of anything but how brainwashed they are.
/r/MensRights25/08/24 08:08 AM
2

If you look at the stats the biggest abuse threat to children and babies is their mothers. In a world where children are systemically abused and raped by women's violence - it is the responsibility of women, not children, to prove that it's "not all women". And you don't prove it by convincing children to trust men; you prove it by convincing women not to violate their children. If Farida D is correct there then this is correct as well.
/r/MensRights15/08/24 06:51 AM
6

There could be some good reasons True, but the proportion of the global male population who are self-hating masochists with an overpowering humiliation/emotional pain fetish has got to be statistically insignificant.
/r/MensRights11/08/24 11:29 AM
45

How dare men (checks notes) propose to the woman they love! The sheer gall! In all seriousness though why would any man even consider marriage these days?
/r/MensRights11/08/24 09:46 AM
82

Because, as women take over higher education, and get preferential treatment in hiring, promotions, etc more and more wives are - as the article points out - out-earning their husbands. Women being given those advantages is, apparently, 'equality'; but women carrying the responsibility (and legal/financial liabilities) that those advantages bring apparently isn't.
/r/MensRights04/08/24 05:04 PM
2

Even then, at least they included female perpetrators and male victims. It's definitely a step forwards, but that weak a statement (going by your quote) is going to be very easily downplayed/ignored by the police and courts.
/r/MensRights12/06/24 06:36 AM
8

Not framing the issue as one where men are always/can only ever be the abuser, and women are always/can only ever be the victim, is a step forwards - but at this point not explicitly stating that women can be and are abusers, and men can be and are victims of domestic abuse and violence is basically just allowing them to continue pretending that arrow only points one way.
/r/MensRights11/06/24 12:09 PM
36

Feminist Explanation of why lots of men fantasise about threesomes: "[buzzword]! [buzzword]! [buzzword]! [psychobabble]! [psychobabble]! [psychobabble]! [conspiracy theory]! [conspiracy theory]! [conspiracy theory]!" Actual Explanation of why lots of men fantasise about threesomes: 1+1=2 , 2>1, Q.E.D.
/r/MensRights29/04/24 07:33 PM
14

Why not just use "mostly male" to describe jobs where there's more men? Because 'Male Dominated' plays into their fantasies of being an oppressed group struggling for 'equality'. It also sounds better politically for them.
/r/MensRights24/04/24 06:55 AM
13

Has Feminism become a free pass to dodge responsibility? What do you mean 'become'? It's just responsibility dodging all the way down.
/r/MensRights23/04/24 06:40 AM
50

"You just said something that I don't like; THAT JUST MEANS THARE YOU ARE EVIL, THAT YOU SHOULD HATE YOURSELF, AND THAT YOU SHOULD CHANGE ANYTHING AND EVERYTHING ABOUT YOURSELF TO PLEASE ME!!!!!!!!" There you go, that's all the 'toxic masculinity' means today, in use at least.
/r/MensRights08/04/24 09:07 PM
85

At this point why don't the papers just title these articles "Another bloody one: It's happened again (we can't believe it either)". They'd have a lot less work to do, and it would probably lower printing costs too.
/r/MensRights23/03/24 10:57 PM
7

Women's groups, for decades: "WE DEMAND EQUALITY WITH MEN!!!!". Women's groups, when they are treated the same way men are: "NOOOOOOO! NOT LIKE THAT!!!!!". Are they now 'saying the quiet bit' as newspaper headlines?
/r/MensRights22/03/24 08:06 AM
18

and yet the vast majority of that 'awful big group' seem to be completely comfortable falling into lockstep behind people who will treat even larger groups as singular, monolithic, subhuman evils. Odd, isn't it?
/r/MensRights15/03/24 08:27 PM
5

It’s women who make the system, and they give themselves special privileges I'd argue that it was more power hungry politicians (of both sexes) who make the rules to play to women, granting them special privileges etc - but at the end of the day both of those have much the same effect.
/r/MensRights15/03/24 08:14 PM
5

We're talking about/dealing with people who have rejected reality. It shouldn't be surprising that their ideas and impressions are completely bat-shit crazy.
/r/MensRights15/03/24 07:31 PM
17

which is of course completely false. I'd argue it's worse than that, we're increasingly getting to the point where it's not just false - but the complete inverse of reality.
/r/MensRights15/03/24 07:13 PM
10

But when you debate with them how can they not understand? The most charitable answer I can think of to that would be that they genuinely and honestly believe what they're saying. In which case they're delusional, and either angry or scared because you represent a threat to the worldview they honestly believe is true. If that's the case they're still wrong, but persuading them of that will be all but impossible. A less charitable, but I think more likely to be accurate, answer would be that they…
/r/MensRights06/03/24 08:21 PM
68

How are men supposed to be the most empathetic version of themselves that women say they want when they are barred from academia, the Humanities, and any discussion about sex and gender. They feel qualified to gaslight generations of kids and female professors will lie to girls and tell them things like all men like sex all the time, men hate when you ask them out, men are trying to impress you. None of that shit is true and they have no idea about how testosterone works on the brain. You know t…
/r/MensRights06/03/24 05:21 PM
2

a growing body of literature So 'Lots of people have said X, therefore X is something real and true that needs to be taken seriously'?
/r/MensRights05/03/24 05:00 PM
-3

Yeah . . . cool story bro, nice attempt to publicise your youtube channel.
/r/MensRights04/03/24 06:28 PM
7

Is it wrong that I can't imagine any government in Westminster appealing to the male (never mind incel) vote?
/r/MensRights04/03/24 06:23 PM
9

Before I hit the play button I honestly thought that this video was going to make me angry. After watching it I am genuinely curious - how does a person get that thoroughly divorced from reality? How does a person like that honestly believe that they are the 'good guy' in the story they're a part of? How does a person like that expect to be taken seriously, whatever they're saying?
/r/MensRights04/03/24 04:30 PM
16

Sure, just don't expect the facade to crumble when it's presented with a little information it doesn't like. They've been trying to pretend that reality is the opposite for what it actually is for a long time now. Your best bet isn't to 'convert' the feminist cultist, but to help show people who haven't been persuaded either way which side is actually based in fact.
/r/MensRights04/03/24 01:13 PM
29

Of course not, they were expecting it to confirm every single one of their biases. When it didn't they did their level best to bury it and pretend it had never happened. That seems to be just 'what they do' whenever they're presented with information that doesn't shamelessly flatter their preconceptions.
/r/MensRights04/03/24 01:01 PM
64

Why would they want a study, even if they commissioned it, or to understand the phenomenon? They've got a perfectly good political boogieman, why sully that with something as tawdry as reality when they can still use it?
/r/MensRights04/03/24 11:59 AM
1

It's the (entirely imaginary, non-existent, made up) hamsters in the walls that are psychic - not the feminist freaking out because of them.
/r/MensRights02/03/24 09:20 PM
2

Illuminati, the Freemasons, the Jesuits, you can substitute basically any conspiracy theory group in there. I just use 'PSYCHIC HAMSTERS' because it helps to remind you that these aren't just people who have unfortunately started believing something that doesn't seem to square all that closely with reality - they're just b***-****ing crazy.
/r/MensRights02/03/24 08:44 PM
124

Of those 2-in-3 men who do marry how many of them will still be married (to the same woman) five years after they sign the paperwork?
/r/MensRights01/03/24 09:32 PM
28

I think the instant it's ever mentioned or evoked, the person doing so ceases to be someone with credibility or integrity, and isn't worth listening to You've hit the nail on the head there. Every time you hear/read someone (seriously) using the term 'Patriarchy' just redraft the sentence in your head to replace that term with something more fitting - like 'THE PSYCHIC HAMSTERS THAT LIVE IN MY WALLS!!!!!!!'. It makes it a little easier to deal with the oversaturation of that particular, hateful,…
/r/MensRights01/03/24 08:13 AM
26

In this forum we believe in mandating judges to award 50/50 unless there is a conviction of child abuse and that custody decisions should be available for appeal. Unfortunately the only thing that standard would achieve would be a HUGE increase in the number of fathers on the receiving end of a completely baseless and false abuse charge. IIRC it's already a thing in Canada, where divorce lawyers refer to making that sort of charge against the father as 'the magic bullet', as even if the charge i…
/r/MensRights19/02/24 02:14 PM
27

You're looking at it from the wrong perspective. The goal of saying that isn't to present a consistent, rational, argument that's backed by the evidence to demonstrate that their position is correct. The goal is to attempt to shame you in order to stop the discussion entirely, and to reinforce their own sense of righteousness and victimhood. That's literally all it is.
/r/MensRights30/01/24 10:30 PM
23

No worries, glad I could help.
/r/MensRights29/01/24 11:36 AM
81

The entire video there explains why, at least, many men don't feel sorry for women in that situation. They had the chance to live the kind of romantic/sex lives that only the top 1% of men are ever going to even have a chance at, they had the opportunity during that period of their lives to set things up so that the good times were likely to keep going for them in perpetuity, and they decided - for whatever reason - not to take that opportunity, and now they're complaining that not taking that o…
/r/MensRights29/01/24 10:53 AM
27

It's worse than just a mistake, it establishes a precedent that this sort of action is OK and not something that someone (OK, let's be brutally honest, some woman) should be punished for.
/r/MensRights24/01/24 06:05 PM
1

You're probably not going to get advice from a lawyer on Reddit. If you do they'll have to keep it very general and full of 'NOT LEGAL ADVICE' to protect themselves. The things you can do and that might work (emphasis on might) will vary wildly depending on which jurisdiction you're in. Pretty much whatever you do there'll be a risk of her still raking you over the coals if a divorce actually happens. I hope it all works out for you, but definitely talk to a lawyer beforehand, even if it costs y…
/r/MensRights17/01/24 08:24 AM
16

Be honest, are you even a little bit surprised at this point? It'll keep getting worse until it breaks.
/r/MensRights30/12/23 11:08 PM
29

This just in! 'Modern' researchers conclusively prove that up is down, black is white, war is peace, freedom is slavery, and ignorance is strength! More at 11.
/r/MensRights20/12/23 06:22 PM
0

Considering the percentage of men who are either voluntarily or involuntarily celibate/virginal, and how that percentage is only likely to increase from here on out . . . is this really that significant a development?
/r/MensRights19/12/23 07:45 AM
59

important conversations That's an interesting way to describe an entire media/activist shrieking about how this film 'promotes violence!' and 'enables/advocates rape and abuse!'
/r/MensRights14/12/23 07:19 PM
3

my reply is "whatever you mean when you say assuming men and women are equal" in whatever way you meant it there, is the way that I'm asking. That would be why I included the first paragraph in the post you're responding to there. What you and/or I may or may not believe about men and women is largely irrelevant when we live in societies whose legal system and social attitudes are increasingly predicated on the assumption that men and women are all equal in all ways - meaning that if there is no…
/r/MensRights13/12/23 08:23 PM
7

The reason for including that assumption in the thought experiment was to highlight the inequality in expectations for men and women that most of society holds in that (and similar) scenarios. If it's not reasonable for people to expect any woman to risk injury and potentially even death to save a man she doesn't know then it is just as unreasonable to expect any man to risk the same injury and potentially even death to save a women he doesn't know. As for my answer to that question the reason t…
/r/MensRights13/12/23 07:04 PM
7

Do you mean 'do you think they are equal'? 'do you think they should be considered equal'? Or any one of the potentially thousands of different interpretations that question could have depending on any range of factors?
/r/MensRights13/12/23 06:11 PM
37

Even assuming that it A: works, and B: doesn't screw you up (either long term, short term, or both) who wants to bet it'll become the focus of an extreme hate campaign from . . . certain segments of the media, academia, and politics for taking power out of womens hands, I mean oppressing and harming women.
/r/MensRights13/12/23 05:37 PM
91

Thought Experiment: A man on the train is getting held down and raped by another (presumably larger, and aggressive) man. Do the women in the train carriage while this is happening have a responsibility/obligation to step up and get their jaws broken in their attempts to save him? If not then, assuming that men and women are equal, there can be no reason or expectation for a man to step in to help a woman in the same situation.
/r/MensRights13/12/23 11:40 AM
7

Feminists really do hate men! How long did it take you to work that one out mate?
/r/MensRights28/11/23 07:03 PM
22

Rich women Female children Middle Class women Rich men Cats, dogs, and various other animals Male children Middle Class men Poor men Homeless men Men with mental health issues There we go, fixed that for you.
/r/MensRights24/11/23 07:59 AM
3

Threats Sexual Persuasion Isolation Peer-Pressure Emotional Abuse Using/Abusing Social Status Intimidation Minimise/Deny/Blame Isn't that just a laundry list of the various things society and women's groups do to young men?
/r/MensRights03/11/23 07:51 AM
2

What kind of parallel universe did you come from, and do you know how people from our side can cross over?
/r/MensRights26/10/23 03:49 PM
13

Is this radicalisation as in 'a global network of killers financed by a shadowy network of billionaires and out for her head'? Or is it more along the lines of 'some white men occasionally disagree with her when she's being especially unpleasant and aggressive with them'?
/r/MensRights22/10/23 08:54 PM
3

It’s clear society simply cares more about women’s safety and well being than men’s. Taken in context of the general tenor of the conversation surrounding male suicide, men/boys in education, how men and boys are treated by the justice system/family courts, and a whole range of other issues I think it would be a lot more accurate to say that society actively hates men and boys.
/r/MensRights12/10/23 08:23 PM
2

They are really reaching for the inevitable point where non simp men will eventually not give a fuck about women's problems anymore. Not really be against anything, just ignore them, pretend like they don't exist. Aren't we basically already there? Granted, it'll take another few years before it gets really obvious, but that describes a large and growing portion of the male population in a lot of countries now.
/r/MensRights08/10/23 12:25 PM
16

Just substitute every instance of the word 'patriarchy' you hear/read for something along the lines of 'THE ILLUMINATI!' or 'EVIL PSYCHIC SPACE SQUIRRELS FROM THE MIRROR UNIVERSE!!' and you'll put the statement or comment in its correct context.
/r/MensRights03/10/23 03:50 PM
2

do they seriously think men all over the world are conspiring to commit acts of violence against women and it's government policy for women to be victims of male violence? For the majority of them they've just been taught to recite that 'systemic' line as a handy little thought terminating cliché. For the people who put that argument together though their goal appears to be (from what we can tell by their actions and results, and their reaction to those results) to hurt men. Why would they want …
/r/MensRights27/09/23 07:20 AM
35

If women truly want gender equality they also need to address this kind of problems but I never heard once You've hit the nail on the head there. They've had long enough to implement their policies and theory that by now I think we can safely conclude that all the talk from women's groups about 'equality of the sexes' was just a smokescreen. They're just a collection of hateful, bigoted, anti-male, hate groups - and they always have been.
/r/MensRights27/09/23 07:07 AM
14

They're a loooong way past just having 'an easy life'. The Billionaire class is now living the sort of lives that would make the old emperors look like beggars; by this point they'd probably see 'an easy life' as some kind of crushing poverty.
/r/MensRights27/09/23 06:54 AM
4

As has been pointed out you can call them 'gold-diggers', but the implication there is that they're a small subset of women who need to be categorised separately from the rest of the group. I think most of us would agree that, looking at women today, the overwhelming majority of them seem to fall into that category though - which would make them the default women and mean we need a name to categorise the small group of women who do not act like that.
/r/MensRights16/09/23 12:20 PM
11

tl;dr - The game is rigged in women's favour, and this oppresses women. Men should feel bad about how much the game that's rigged against them is upsetting women.
/r/MensRights16/09/23 08:21 AM
3

Patriarchy Right up there with 'The International Zionist Conspiracy' and 'Muh Illuminaughti!' in terms of people desperately trying to create the omnipresent, omnipotent (yet surprisingly easy to beat), and unseeable boogie-man your story needs to actually sound consistent. Rape Culture If you read up on how criminals are treated by other criminals in prison across the developed world the only people who are seen as more disgusting pieces of shit than rapists are child rapists. When people who …
/r/MensRights14/09/23 06:49 AM
5

I don't know dude, women commit a shedload of domestic violence (not including the non-violent types of domestic abuse) right up until the moment society starts talking about domestic violence - when suddenly all abusers become men and all victims become women.
/r/MensRights10/09/23 02:06 PM
9

I can't help but think that if Letby had been a male nurse he would have been (at the very least) taken out of that unit and put under some kind of disciplinary supervision the instant anyone on the ward even breathed a rumour that he had been responsible for the death of a single baby - never mind murdering multiple babies over the course of years. That's assuming that he wasn't immediately arrested and charged of course. He certainly would not have been supported by the entirety of the hospita…
/r/MensRights21/08/23 07:32 AM
2

Fuck me, is it too much to ask to have been born a few generations ago? I accept that a lot would be harder back then, but just not having to deal with this shit would be a huge step forwards.
/r/MensRights06/08/23 09:55 PM
2

Assuming that you're a natural born male there's no way to escape the primordial, original, sin of not being a woman. Many have tried, and a few have even died in the attempt, but none have succeeded.
/r/MensRights06/08/23 09:47 PM
2

Assuming that your asshole is not a woman calling somebody else misogynistic (i.e. the gold standard for human purity /s) then it must, obviously, hate all women as a group. That's just obvious. /s.
/r/MensRights06/08/23 09:37 PM
3

Or they will just get angry, label you a misogynistic asshole and tell all their friends. True, but that's just par for the course these days. You'd have a shorter list if you tried to find everything that wasn't a misogynistic asshole.
/r/MensRights06/08/23 08:58 PM
2

Ask them to expand on what they mean when they say that. Keep asking questions, and you can slowly start to strip away the cover hiding that they have no idea what they're talking about. The entire 'male privilege means you can't be discriminated against' is a pretty obvious attempt to try to hide the fact that their entire movement is a privileged hate group at this point, but most of them don't seem to realise it. Socratic Enquiry/The Socratic Method is the fancy term for what you're doing the…
/r/MensRights06/08/23 08:37 AM
10

You get some real 'It didn't happen, but they deserved it' vibes it from most media outlets these days.
/r/MensRights06/08/23 07:58 AM
2

Woman treated badly because she's a woman: 'Misogyny!' Woman treated well because she's a woman: 'Misogyny!' Woman treated less than perfectly for no particular reason: 'Misogyny!' Woman exists in a world that isn't explicitly designed at every level to give her absolutely everything she wants instantly and for free: 'Misogyny!' At this point the only meaning the word 'Misogyny' holds is 'We need to give feminists more power because reasons!'. The next time someone tries this on you take them th…
/r/MensRights05/08/23 07:08 AM
3

When coalminers were being laid off all we could hear from (feminist/feminist leaning) journalists and commentators was 'LOL, what a dumbass, just learn to code bro!!!!!!!!'. Looks like a lot of journalists and commentators are going to need to learn to get comfy swinging a pickaxe, lol.
/r/MensRights02/08/23 06:23 PM
18

I sincerely hope that everything turns up well for him in the Netherlands. He's suffered enough for one lifetime. Not wanting to take away from the seriousness of the story or what's happened to this man, is anyone else irritated at the typo in the article headline?
/r/MensRights30/07/23 03:46 PM
2

I think twice the punishment their victim would have faced is the absolute bare minimum. Police officers, prosecutors, judges, etc aren't just ordinary citizens - they hold a special place within our society and are trusted with vastly increased power and the responsibility to uphold justice (or at the very least the law). As they are trusted with the power to potentially destroy evidence etc in an attempt to pervert the course of justice - something that ordinary citizens could never realistica…
/r/MensRights30/07/23 06:37 AM
69

Manchester Police withheld evidence from the defence and destroyed evidence in order to secure a conviction The Police Officers who decided to do that (and cause a man to be wrongfully imprisoned) will face absolutely no criminal charges, internal disciplinary procedures, or even be named. I really ought to be more shocked that something like that happened, shouldn't I?
/r/MensRights29/07/23 04:57 PM
8

What makes you think that's an unintentional consequence of the plan going too far, rather than the desired goal from day one?
/r/MensRights27/07/23 03:06 PM
393

The truly terrifying part of this is that she almost certainly, genuinely, thinks that she's being reasonable, sensible, compassionate, and good when she writes that.
/r/MensRights21/07/23 11:23 AM
10

Who wants to bet this'll be hijacked and turned into "101 new things men should do for women"?
/r/MensRights20/07/23 10:09 PM
137

I'm a woman and I was fired/had something bad happen to me/was looked at/got bored - therefore sexism. Q.E.D. Bigot! Don't look for any deeper meaning or logic in this, that's literally all it is.
/r/MensRights20/07/23 05:26 PM
18

Is it not of public interest that dozens of people allege poor behaviour from a celebrated public figure? considering that we have already seen intentionally false accusations (i.e. complete fabrications, not just 'he said she said') used for any number of goals from scoring political points to wanting 15 minutes in the media spotlight, to one girl who alleged that her boyfriend had raped her (while he was out of the country interestingly enough) because she wanted a chance to resit her exams, I…
/r/MensRights19/07/23 05:45 PM
63

Well, the Police and CPS decided exactly that. Why do you think it's so unlikely?
/r/MensRights19/07/23 05:04 PM
10

It isn't systemic or institutional anywhere in most of the world. As far as I can see the claim that 'misogyny is systemic' just exists as a way for ideologues to avoid being called on their bullshit - it doesn't matter how thoroughly you prove that misogyny is a negligible/non-existent factor in most of modern Earth, they can just claim 'oh, it's baked into the system' and pretend that that means that until you've torn down every institution in the world the knees will still be soggy.
/r/MensRights13/07/23 11:49 PM
3

There's not much that can be done about it though, without someone literally purging academia of the various groups of zealots found there. Once it's published, and determined to reinforce 'The Message' it gets accepted and cited all over the place and is suddenly accepted as 'The Truth' by everyone from academia, the media, the government, the courts, and most of general society. Just look up The Sokal Hoax if you want to see one of the few funny sides of this.
/r/MensRights12/07/23 11:15 AM
6

Most of these junk studies that find bias against women, are poorly designed surveys or post-hoc observational studies dripping wet with confirmation bias, and very light on rigor. They're actually incredibly well designed, once you accept that the goal was to push 'The Message' rather than to describe reality. You've got to put a lot of work into misrepresenting reality as consistently as modern feminist researchers do.
/r/MensRights12/07/23 07:34 AM
3

We know that DVA against men is a seriously underreported crime, and we know that 713,000 men were reported to have been a victim of one or more types of DVA. That's not a bug, it's a feature.
/r/MensRights12/07/23 07:17 AM
18

So did the girls think that they were genuinely being kidnapped (for no apparent reason)? Or were they trying to put together a clickbaity tiktok video? They're both fairly horrific scenarios, for different reasons, but which of them was actually happening here?
/r/MensRights11/07/23 05:31 PM
53

If feminists didn't have double standards they wouldn't have any standards at all.
/r/MensRights10/07/23 11:30 AM
416

It's not fair. They know it's not fair. It's a pretty obvious power play, but best of luck getting any of them to admit it.
/r/MensRights08/07/23 04:18 PM
13

It's pretty simple, as far as these ideologues are concerned men and boys aren't people (with inherent worth and value) but just 'things' - if you're lucky then they might promote you to the level of 'a useful tool for a woman to use and enjoy' which would get you slightly better treatment, but still just objects, a barely sentient machine. Most of their rhetoric makes a lot more sense when you understand the 'perspective' it's based on.
/r/MensRights05/07/23 06:45 AM
10

I'd be shocked and amazed if the guy who agreed with her that the idea of a dowry is a 'social evil' was rejecting her for dowry related reasons. It's interesting that the BBC doesn't recognise that, in that culture at least, it's not so much the couple working out if they want to get married, but the two sets of parents negotiating the marriage like it was still 1500AD.
/r/MensRights04/07/23 07:13 AM
3

The problem is that if you don't "name the beast" you open up the opportunity for feminists to claim that "All mens problems are caused by the patriarchy, and if you all just became feminists we'll get around to fixing them … probably, eventually, maybe".
/r/MensRights01/07/23 09:57 AM
1

Depending on how you look at it it's either a logical fallacy, or an underhanded argument technique (depending on whether or not the person is aware of what they're doing and why it's a bad argument). The idea is that you have two statements/arguments/positions - one of them very calm, moderate, and sensible; and the other one that's the sort of crazy that anyone outside of the echo chamber will find repulsive. The name comes from the Early Medieval style of European Castle, which comes with a h…
/r/MensRights30/06/23 09:54 PM
3

It's not strictly gaslighting OP, it's the Motte and Bailey argument. It's pretty widespread and almost everybody does it every now and then. The interesting thing is that the feminists I've seen using it either genuinely didn't understand or believe that they were doing it, or that they just became almost comedically angry when they were called on it.
/r/MensRights29/06/23 10:24 AM
46

I don’t think a single comment about someone’s backside should be cause for firing Tell that to the HR rep when something completely innocent you say gets taken out of context. Until then what's good for the goose is good for the gander.
/r/MensRights25/06/23 07:56 PM
4

Are we entirely sure that that link isn't to an elaborately disguised Babylon Bee article?
/r/MensRights24/06/23 11:30 AM
11

Assuming those numbers are correct that is a bizarre scenario. Usually the male casualties are a hell of a lot higher than that.
/r/MensRights22/06/23 10:00 PM
107

a generic insult, and the go to thought-terminating cliche for anything relating to a mans sexuality.
/r/MensRights03/06/23 07:20 AM
13

Because it happens so rarely?
/r/MensRights26/05/23 06:43 AM
15

However, the study also set out reasons for retaining juries. 'Removing juries might have an impact on public confidence in the justice system,' it warned. Well, credit to them for acknowledging that their bigoted proposal might have some negative consequences, but that's a hell of a way to phrase 'Removing juries would turn the affected trials into completely unjust and tyrannical kangaroo courts'.
/r/MensRights23/05/23 10:33 AM
37

"Equality for me, but not for thee" it's a pretty standard component of the ideology. It would honestly be surprising if they didn't push a message like that.
/r/MensRights21/05/23 02:19 PM
28

It's not so much gaslighting (or even necessarily misandry) so much as a basic ad hominem. It's one of the standard responses of people who don't know how to think through a counter-argument they've just been presented with, leading them to just resort to something no more intelligent or relevant than a 5 year old shouting "YOU'RE JUST A STINKY DOO DOO FACE!!!!". Just point that out and ignore the attempt at an argument.
/r/MensRights13/05/23 12:30 PM
9

The road forwards has always been long, and usually fairly unpleasant to actually walk on. Definitely don't get your hopes up; but this is a sign of things moving (however slowly). Just look out for yourself, and the men around you as best you can, as we keep moving forwards. Oh, and be grateful that it's probably not going to need anything like Blair Mountain or Peterloo.
/r/MensRights06/05/23 09:00 AM
40

It'll take a long time, and a major shift in power/influence around the world, before this moves from an effectively censored website to mainstream discussions - but that does seem to be coming.
/r/MensRights06/05/23 07:04 AM
12

According to the article: Have you ever dated someone who took the relationship from 0-100 miles per hour, flooding you with affection so fast your head was spinning? Were you, either pleasantly or unpleasantly, overwhelmed by the pace and relentlessness of their wooing? If your answer to either of the first questions was ‘yes’ then you may have been love bombed. So, in practice, I think it boils down to "Any act of even minor unpleasantness (from a man to a female partner) is abuse, and any pos…
/r/MensRights30/04/23 07:09 AM
13

Also Women MUST learn the Harsh Lesson that Respect is Earned. So much this. If you want men and boy to respect de wimmins then you're going to need to spend a lot of time and energy teaching women and girls to be respectable.
/r/MensRights28/04/23 06:25 AM
19

Please tell me what I should do. What they want you to do is Accept the 'narrative' (which is totally different from a fairy tale, for ... reasons) that all women are always the victim, always and everywhere and forever, Amen. See 1, also hate yourself. Accept that 1 means that whatever knee jerk, self defeating, bigoted, poorly managed, wasteful, and/or just flat out idiotic policy/plan/etc they come up with next is a wonderful, good, idea and also very stunning and brave. Shut up and give them…
/r/MensRights13/04/23 11:01 AM
113

women get free access to contraceptives. Is that just the pill? Or could you, with a straight face, get free condoms to keep your feminine sperm from impregnating your lesbian partner?
/r/MensRights30/03/23 07:34 PM
41

What's your take on this? It's openly and intentionally bigoted, almost looking like the person/people saying it is revelling in the fact that they can say that and not only get away with it but be praised for saying it.
/r/MensRights26/03/23 10:48 AM
17

Even if you had video of a man walking close behind a woman at night and whistling the tune to the most misogynistic rap every written it still wouldn't be a crime under this bill (as it's written) until he confessed that he was doing it with the intention of intimidating/upsetting the woman. Of course the only evidence they'll actually need to convict him for that would be her statement that she felt intimidated, or believed he intended to frighten her. Granted, the idea of a crime happening be…
/r/MensRights24/03/23 05:19 PM
15

I'm sure that it's hardly been a pleasant experience for the women and girls involved - but let's take this at face value; whatever the next big war your country gets involved in might happen to be let's campaign to end this injustice. Let's campaign for the roles to be swapped, to spare women the 'high price' of being kept safe at all costs by giving them the easier role on the front lines getting blown up and psychologically devastated. It's the pro-equality, pro-woman, position after all. Hil…
/r/MensRights20/03/23 07:26 AM
3

It's a way to ignore you and what you're saying without having to actually acknowledge, address, or even listen to what you're saying. By doing that they can keep pumping their narrative without having to ask if they are in the wrong, which protects them from the fact that their ideology and the stories they so desperately want to believe in are increasingly disproven to the point where even they are having a hard time ignoring it. There's no way to talk or persuade these people out of the path …
/r/MensRights19/03/23 06:00 PM
10

Don't forget the apex (so far) of this phenomenon.
/r/MensRights16/03/23 08:49 PM
75

Women attack men, denigrate them over nothing, and do everything they can to stop them from finding happiness in relationships. Women most affected. There you go, you don't need to read the article now.
/r/MensRights16/03/23 05:56 PM
2

It's a good first step, and I apologise for the pessimism here, but this looks like a finding that is going to get torn apart at appeal.
/r/MensRights15/03/23 07:23 AM
34

If you ever want to demonstrate why feminist literature/talking points are invalid and bigoted just invert them. In this case that would be "In society men are the first to suffer, and the last to be heard". Huh, that actually describes things pretty accurately, assuming we get heard at all that is.
/r/MensRights09/03/23 07:55 AM
5

I think that the line you quoted there is overstated, but that's a long way from it being false. It's barely a controversial point these days to say that many if not most women seem to see men as little more than an object to be used, and discarded when she has no more use for him. Saying that is not a sign of hatred, that's not dehumanising anyone, that's not inciting anything. It's recognising what the overwhelming majority of men have seen in modern dating and relationships. Are there women o…
/r/MensRights02/03/23 06:46 PM
10

I'm not disagreeing with your point that women are human. That would be an idiotic position to argue against. Then again human beings are often entirely untrustworthy if not actively malicious. Considering that (at least) the bulk of women under retirement age at the moment were brought up in an environment where they were trained from birth to believe that you, as a man, are evil, dangerous, powerful, and bigoted - and that whatever they decide to do with you will be justified due to an oppress…
/r/MensRights02/03/23 05:32 PM
10

That's a fair point. I'd argue that the comparison at the end there - while I can see what you're saying - isn't a fair comparison though. Looking back through the women I've met (other than the bulk of the ones related to me, thank goodness) the vast majority of them seem, at best, to be completely untrustworthy - with a worrying number that I can only describe as actively malicious. I'm perfectly happy to accept that that doesn't apply all of them, but it's increasingly getting to the point wh…
/r/MensRights02/03/23 05:05 PM
1

There have been studies in this subject. If I recall correctly the false accusation rate runs from about 40% to 95% (it obviously won't be that neat of course) depending on which studies you accept as valid. The higher end of that came from a single study in the US Airforce shortly after they announced a policy of promoting any woman who made that sort of allegation, in order to 'smooth over the difficulty' and make sure that they didn't get sued. While anyone with an understanding of incentives…
/r/MensRights23/02/23 05:59 PM
7

More than I think they wanted, still not much, but then again I do make a point of looking things up if they're not getting much attention in the press.
/r/MensRights23/02/23 09:50 AM
16

It’s amazing how much the powers that be can control the narrative. I'm still amazed that they don't control it more tbh.
/r/MensRights23/02/23 09:44 AM
44

Some highlights for the people who don't want to click the link, all direct quotes. For the first time, the police will be required to treat violence against women and girls as a "national threat". This means it should be given the same priority as serious organised crime, terrorism and child abuse. Because that's definitely an appropriate step to take and not at all a ridiculous overreaction. ​ Under the government's proposals, the law will be changed so that police, prison and probation servic…
/r/MensRights20/02/23 03:57 PM
5

It's the socially praised and officially accepted hategroup of the modern age. Why wouldn't they act the way they do, and why wouldn't they be praised for doing so?
/r/MensRights18/02/23 12:49 AM
11

Feminists embrace double standards while accusing everyone else of holding double standards Well colour me surprised! Who could ever have predicted this?
/r/MensRights18/02/23 12:47 AM
10

The idea that 'The Patriarchy hurts men too!' is an inherently bigoted statement, that tells us a lot about how Feminism/Feminists see and think of men. If you look through history you will find countless examples of scenarios where one group of people decided to oppress/hurt/screw over another group of people. Whether that's two tribal groups going to war, the various times slavery has been implemented around the world, the horror shows that came out of radical 20th century politics, etc. Given…
/r/MensRights17/02/23 12:06 PM
6

They're imagining threats that are not even present. If they weren't creating imaginary monsters for themselves the entire movement would have ended decades ago.
/r/MensRights03/02/23 08:16 AM
70

True, but just using it as an excuse helps establish the idea that you can be discriminatory against men helps in the long run. Granted, it's a very small victory, but unless you've got another one lying around I'll hang onto it.
/r/MensRights24/01/23 05:41 PM
6

I think for a lot of people it's a quick, easy, and convenient way to put some reassuring distance between themselves and the guy who just killed himself. The idea of someone being ground down to the point where that's the only course of action they can consider is genuinely terrifying, especially since (as you point out) it can happen to pretty much anyone. By saying 'only weak men do that' they're pretty clearly implying that they themselves aren't in the category of people who could end up in…
/r/MensRights23/01/23 10:48 PM
13

Why? Because it works. It still justifies almost anything to most of the people who hear it, and it works so well that it's become an inextricable cornerstone of the entire ideology they're pushing. Remove the Patriarchy Conspiracy Theory and the entire house of cards comes crumbling down.
/r/MensRights28/11/22 10:17 PM
85

Legally? No. Morally? Yes.
/r/MensRights28/11/22 08:41 AM
17

If there was a single woman among the dead then that would have been front page news for months.
/r/MensRights24/11/22 08:26 AM
2

Have fun with that mate.
/r/MensRights14/11/22 07:54 PM
1

So you're advocating for non-democratic (presumably at least a little bit oligarchic) republics? If you aren't then your first posts sound very much like you are.
/r/MensRights14/11/22 07:38 PM
4

Even if that was true, it's still a hell of a lot better than being subject to the rule of whichever sociopath happens to have seized power this week.
/r/MensRights14/11/22 07:27 PM
19

Not in themselves, just a few particular attempts at liberal democracy. It looks like they need an ironclad constitution, bill of rights, and a population engaged enough to care about both of them.
/r/MensRights14/11/22 05:19 PM
19

I've read the posts OP, and granted it's a shitty situation for the guy, but it sounds like he's got things under as much control as he can - more than most men could hope for in similar situations. He managed to guarantee the DNA test, isn't on the hook to pay for some other guy bastard, and managed to talk his mother around. In the second post he's preparing a legal action he describes as 'the nuclear option' after she tried to get him fired. Granted, it shouldn't happen, and that thing with h…
/r/MensRights12/11/22 06:20 PM
34

BREAKING NEWS! Group set up to propagate hatred against men hates men! Stay tuned for our ground-breaking investigation into the bathroom habits of bears.
/r/MensRights11/11/22 07:57 AM
115

"Hey, can we stop mutilating baby boys for pretty much no reason whatsoever?" No, the cutting will continue, and you're probably some kind of bigot for asking that! . . . . . Wait, it costs how much? Good news in the effect it's having, depressingly familiar reasoning when you actually look at it.
/r/MensRights10/11/22 08:22 AM
29

Would that be 'causing a civil war' by not immediately abandoning their rights, liberties, and interests on demand? How evil of them!
/r/MensRights06/11/22 12:00 AM
4

Thanks for understanding. That is depressingly rare in the women I've met so far. Don't worry about asking questions, it's ok and keep going. Looking at what you've said there I'm sorry to hear that you've had those experiences. I know I'm relatively lucky (in that I've only had a handful of horrible experiences with women) but it is easy to let something like that colour your perception of an entire group of people. The best advice I can give to you/them there is to run it through as what I lik…
/r/MensRights30/10/22 10:36 PM
10

what issues should be addressed first That's a hell of a question. I think if you ask three guys that you'll get at least five different answers. There are just that many, important, things to deal with that there's no way around that sort of thing. If you asked me I'd say the best problem to solve would be the mistreatment ('discrimination' has been so overused as to be all but meaningless by now) of men by the courts, police, and politicians. Or possibly the way that women are being trained fr…
/r/MensRights30/10/22 10:16 PM
176

My sister in law said she would rather spend her money on a steak at a restaurant then help pay for our medical bills I'm very sorry to hear that, that sounds messed up coming from family. But again for most men the idea that 'if you need help you don't deserve it, and you're pathetic/a failure/disgusting/a joke for even considering asking for help in the first place' is a very common part of their lives.
/r/MensRights15/10/22 03:09 PM
800

Congratulations, you've just been introduced to how society treats men once it can no longer use them (and often while it sill can).
/r/MensRights15/10/22 02:44 PM
13

Simple, it's a 'thought terminating cliche', just a handy little phrase to recite when they hear something they don't like - and that completely absolves them from having to think about what you just said, as they know (even if only on a subconscious level) that thinking about what you're saying might lead to uncomfortable conclusions. Another part of it is probably a desire to hurt you; by bringing up something like that you've upset them, as you've reminded them that there are viewpoints other…
/r/MensRights08/10/22 05:04 PM
2

Disagreeing with the legal system means that you're crazy That's an interesting hill you've chosen to die on. Did you mean to argue that legal systems are always, inherently, right about everything? How do you feel about times that legal systems were radically altered - did the reforms make them more or less right? Does that apply to things like the US laws about the color bar in the 1930's? Or the laws that prevented women from voting in most democratic countries before the late 1800's/early 19…
/r/MensRights04/10/22 11:06 AM
3

If the guidelines have no effect on general sentencing then why do the guidelines exist? I'd be interested in your sources claiming that the average is 2 years.
/r/MensRights04/10/22 07:08 AM
5

To explain those numbers they're based on the CPS sentencing guidelines in the link, which are 4 to 19 years custody with a maximum of a life sentence (not a whole life sentence) multiplied by each of the 'investigations' she caused, with the assumption that each investigation represents a separate false claim. If your assumption is correct and there were only two false accusations, rather than two false accusations that went to court, then it would be between 8 and 38 years, or a life sentence …
/r/MensRights04/10/22 05:59 AM
7

be realistic. I'm happy to disagree with you here, and to limit it to cases like the one posted at the top of this thread where the lie can be proven in court - but I still don't understand how this is being 'unrealistic'. Whether it's the intention of the false-accuser or not the false accusation still causes, often irreparable, harm to the life of the falsely-accused - frequently leading to ended careers, ruined lives, and suicide. Is that not a serious crime?
/r/MensRights03/10/22 11:02 PM
6

The logic behind that argument is that a false claim attempts to exploit the publics reaction to the actual, horrific, crime of rape for the benefit of the false accuser. In this case it's rape, but I honestly believe that attempting to subvert the course of justice in this way is just as horrific for any other crime. Every single false accusation of rape/burglary/assault/etc makes the real crimes that actually happened less believable. Given that every single false accusation of rape makes it t…
/r/MensRights03/10/22 09:46 PM
41

False accusations (for any crime) should be considered an offence in and of themselves, with a mandatory minimum sentence equal to the sentence that would have been given to the false-accusers victim/victims. According to UK law in this instance that would mean she should be looking at a sentence of between 240 and 1140 years. Once you get much above a century of mandatory minimum sentencing it's probably just simpler to call it a 'whole life sentence' (under UK law some life sentence inmates ca…
/r/MensRights03/10/22 07:50 PM
80

Politically motivated activist group writes a lengthy piece demanding that the people they disagree with be silenced. I shouldn't be surprised that this is presented as a neutral 'study' in the media, should I?
/r/MensRights30/09/22 02:49 PM
2

The intended purpose for feminists using it then.
/r/MensRights30/09/22 07:20 AM
2

Are you suggesting that that wasn't its intended purpose?
/r/MensRights30/09/22 06:48 AM
16

The premise of the argument seems to come from a place that sees men as essentially subhuman at worst, or inherently inferior at best. It says that men used violence, manipulation, and 'social conditioning' that seems to border on comic book level mind control when you actually read up on what they claim it can do, to set up a society that is expressly designed to make men's lives better, easier, and more pleasant (and that this was motivated by some poorly defined hatred of all women as a group…
/r/MensRights24/09/22 06:57 AM
11

https://www.citizensadvice.org.uk/law-and-courts/discrimination/discrimination-because-of-sex-or-sexual-orientation/discrimination-because-of-sex/ It does indeed, but guess how that law is applied and who does/does not benefit from it.
/r/MensRights26/08/22 05:56 AM
3

Thank you, and I didn't mean any offense there. It's just that the question you started this thread with looks a lot like something that someone would use as an attempt to start a 'gotcha' thread they could post on 2x etc.
/r/MensRights20/08/22 06:00 PM
9

First off your question sounds a lot like a troll/bait - but I'll give you the benefit of the doubt and assume that it isn't for now. The problem is that the vast majority of feminists don't seem to want a debate; they start from the position that their ideas are self evidently correct and that anyone who opposes them can only do so because they are evil and/or stupid. If you start from a position like that then the only kind of debate you can have is to have your opponent announce his/her evil …
/r/MensRights20/08/22 05:19 PM
2

Translation of the 'points' made in the article: If he doesn't make the relationship all about you and happily turn himself into your serf then he's just screwing with you.
/r/MensRights16/08/22 06:35 PM
25

How about a legal system, academic establishment, and political culture that all portray men 'badly' and refuse to accept that it is even possible for a woman to be responsible for the abuse she gives the men/boys in her life?
/r/MensRights16/08/22 11:04 AM
1

No worries, glad I could help. Back on topic though I think that the effect of military casualties on society is pretty light, especially when compared to the other factors.
/r/MensRights12/08/22 07:51 AM
1

I think the word you're looking for there is 'dysgenic'. Eugenic means something that improves the genetic stock of a given population.
/r/MensRights12/08/22 06:50 AM
5

Why wouldn't they? It keeps working.
/r/MensRights20/07/22 11:33 AM
9

Any chance you can post a precis of/quotes from that 163 page PDF u/DougDante ? Maybe something that shows what you're saying in the title?
/r/MensRights09/07/22 02:40 PM
2

You've got to choose between text or pictures in the opening post. If you want to post pictures and an explanation/question in the same thread then you'll either have to post the pictures in the OP and then copypaste the text into a reply, or post the text in the OP and then link the pictures in a reply.
/r/MensRights26/06/22 06:04 PM
83

It's what they do. Man does something a feminist doesn't like: "Men bad". Man doesn't do something a feminist wants him to: "Men made him feel bad that he wants to do that thing so he didn't do it (regardless of whether that man wanted to do that thing or not), so men bad". Woman does something bad: "Men made her do it, so men bad" Woman doesn't do something good: "Men made her too afraid to do it, so men bad" At this point I wouldn't be surprised to see an article written by a feminist claiming…
/r/MensRights26/06/22 02:58 PM
6

The BBC is now riddled with feminists who dictate content and policy and shows a clear agenda that places female rights WAY above those of any men. It's been that way for a loooooooong time
/r/MensRights24/06/22 07:25 PM
7

More detrimental than killing the child?
/r/MensRights24/06/22 05:02 PM
8

Are you suggesting that women are incapable of raising a child without a mans assistance?
/r/MensRights24/06/22 04:35 PM
22

In what way is it not the same?
/r/MensRights24/06/22 03:36 PM
16

Religious schools in the UK still get a lot of leeway in what they teach. It's still to the syllabus of course (they want their pupils to pass the exams just as much as any other school), but in cases like RE/PSE they can go 'off script' much more than you'd think.
/r/MensRights22/06/22 05:36 PM
80

Fine, "Society was created to please women, and has been since at least the Agricultural Revolution (circa 10'000 BC), therefore women don't get to complain about it". If the other person isn't going to take the conversation seriously, and just spout nonsense like the quote in the title then why should you feel the need to take them seriously? Why should they expect not to be mocked? At the very least the response suggested here contains an attempt at justifying its claim.
/r/MensRights12/06/22 09:58 AM
57

With a sentence equal to what their false accusation would have meant for the man/men she lied about too.
/r/MensRights24/05/22 11:18 AM
76

liar, manipulator, and abuser
/r/MensRights23/05/22 07:06 AM
2

I'll start this off as saying that I can't remember the source (if anyone knows what I'm referring to here then thanks), but a few years ago there was an article on the latest attempt to develop a male birth control pill. They project was cancelled when several of the test subjects developed severe depression - just to be clear we're not talking 'got a bit sad' there it was more on the lines of 'major medical problem, several of them attempted suicide'. As men don't experience as significant or …
/r/MensRights12/05/22 07:44 AM
10

Nope, it's exactly as petty as it sounds. Kate Gallafent QC, who led the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority's legal team, argued that without written consent it would not be lawful to use the embryo. She said the authority was sympathetic and told the judge that its 'sole interest' was to 'promote compliance' with a 'statutory scheme'.
/r/MensRights05/05/22 05:01 PM
20

Imagine thinking that you're oppressed, while living in a world where the government will spend huge amounts of time, effort, and money (during several major national and international crises that really need their attention, no less) to make sure that people don't look at you in a way you don't like.
/r/MensRights27/04/22 06:48 AM
9

At this point, even if you had a video of the entire act, that started with both you and her reading and agreeing to a legally drafted 'Declaration of Mutual Consent (sexual)' it would only take the prosecution a few seconds to claim "my client was clearly pressured into that, therefore the alleged 'statement of consent' is not valid". That might not work for them, but you're still (at best) rolling the dice and hoping with that improbably over the top example.
/r/MensRights20/04/22 11:36 AM
12

It might be a bit of an oldie, but mine is the drama they built up around the phrase 'rule of thumb'. That particular phrase came from carpenters before standardised measuring systems came in who would use parts of their body to measure the cuts and angles for their work (an adult mans thumb is going to remain the same length, unless he has an accident). Feminists claim that it comes from an 18th century British law that a man could beat his wife so long as the stick he used was no wider than hi…
/r/MensRights14/04/22 11:20 AM
6

I’m hoping that they add some enforceable boundaries to the law to stop those doing it for the sake of it. From the looks of it that change is to bring divorce laws 'up to date with modern marriages'. So I think that letting the woman end the marriage with minimal effort whenever the mood takes her is probably a feature rather than a bug. Best case scenario, as they seem set on pushing this through, would be to end the idea of alimony etc in those cases.
/r/MensRights05/04/22 07:20 PM
6

Previously for a woman to obtain a divorce (it almost exclusively was women filing for divorce, after all) she had to demonstrate that the marriage had failed, either due to abuse, abandonment, or some other breach of their marriage contract. Now the court just needs her to file a statement saying 'I believe this marriage has ended' and that's all the demonstration they need.
/r/MensRights05/04/22 07:03 PM
6

Found it, it's a little technical but https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2020/11/section/1/enacted it's in 1(3) - the court is required to take the statement from one or both parties as evidence that the marriage has broken down. That translates to no fault divorce.
/r/MensRights05/04/22 06:47 PM
2

Do you have a source for that? I can't find anything backing it up.
/r/MensRights05/04/22 06:28 PM
5

Sorry to be a downer, but it wouldn't work. Modern academia doesn't deal with difficult/disruptive information by arguing with it - but by declaring that it's an evil lie pushed by [bad group name here] and then ignoring it. You could run that study and prove the premise beyond even an unreasonable doubt, and it would have less impact on things than a single raindrop landing in the ocean.
/r/MensRights05/04/22 04:45 PM
6

If there was it was memory holed very effectively.
/r/MensRights05/04/22 11:50 AM
13

I think his point there was that it's much easier for politicians to start a war if the only people getting sent into combat are other peoples 18 year old sons. Can you think of any politicians who would declare a war if they knew that it would absolutely, definitely, mean that they would be marched into combat 'Enemy at the Gates' style?
/r/MensRights10/03/22 12:39 PM
14

Based and Heinlein pilled
/r/MensRights10/03/22 08:15 AM
84

A few years ago a British journalist travelled around the UK holding seminars asking people across the country "if you could pass any one law, what would it be, and why?". After he'd gone through the list and removed the less coherent/unpublishable suggestions he put the most amusing/interesting ones into a book called "The People's Manifesto". One of the suggestions I can remember from reading that book a while ago was. In the event that parliament declares war, or takes any other action that w…
/r/MensRights10/03/22 07:34 AM
3

How long do you think it would take, after this policy was implemented, before women complain that they're 'denied access' to 'equal use' of the male carriages and that it gets very crowded in their special carriages?
/r/MensRights18/02/22 12:28 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter