TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

raouldukeesq Archive

View 0 posts and 167 comments by raouldukeesq on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

Physical attraction can increase with connection. It can also decrease attraction for those with jacked nervous systems.
/r/seduction05/04/26 07:25 PM
2

The very idea that one can judge the fuck yes or no in the beginning of all relationships is not remotely true. The depth of connection that can be achieved on what he is describing could absolutely lead to the greatest attraction he has ever experienced.
/r/seduction05/04/26 07:24 PM
6

So what are your thoughts about Genghis Khan? Julius Caesar? Shaka Zulu? Alexander the Great? The idea that conquest and oppression is some sort of white people things can only result from a complete lack of historical understanding. The fact of the matter is that humans have a long history of being pretty shitty and an equally long history of evolving and learning how to be better. Very few idolize primitive people for their primitive and outdated ideologies. The bigger problem as I see it is j…
/r/seduction22/08/18 12:03 AM
1

Be interested in what the other person wants to talk about.
/r/seduction28/08/17 08:25 PM
1

Why do redpillars live and breath strawman arguments?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/15 08:23 PM
8

Be friends with women. Supplicate to them. Pedestalize them. Worship them. Give them whatever they want. Take everything they say literally. I've never heard a women or a girl give that advice to anyone, any place or any time. Not personally or in a movie or in a tv show. No one ever said that.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/15 06:32 PM
4

BP advice for attracting women is the same as RP. The be yourself argument is a strawman argument. BP advice would be something along the lines of: 1) never make yourself too available; 2) don't be a pushover; 3) be decisive and make decisions; 4) work out; 5) dress well; 6) have good hygiene; 7) be confident; etc.... Same shit, different delivery.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/15 06:31 PM
3

Starwman. Her main point is that she's not upset and that the deal she got screwed on was her own fault for not adequately using her leverage.
/r/TheRedPill14/10/15 06:01 PM
1

Who does the housework is never a criteria in a family law case.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/10/15 05:59 PM
17

OP's citation shows that the rules, for the most part are fair. I see women get dinged in family court all the time. Generally either the asshole parent or the parent who is better at playing the game win out. The idea that the men get screwed is mostly hamstering by beta wanna be alphas.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/10/15 05:59 PM
2

It was still the right call for her because he clearly was never into her and probably considered her to be a plate.
/r/TheRedPill13/10/15 10:17 PM
1

FYI there are no Alphas. At least not around here anyway. You might find some in the tribal areas of Pakistan but not on Reddit. They're Betas who self identify as Alphas but they're Betas.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/15 05:17 PM
1

You cannot simultaneously hold both of these positions You keep speaking in absolutes about incredibly complex phenomena. Classic strawman argument.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/15 08:57 PM
0

Alpha male: Never ever, ever ever visited an internet thread where the definition of what an Alpha is was discussed.
/r/TheRedPill01/09/15 06:40 PM
0

Redpillars are hilarious! There is not an actual “Alpha” on the planet that would ever participate in such a forum. Redpillars are quintessential “Betas” pretending to be “Alphas.” RedPillars are, without question, sopolistic, hamstering beta’s who do nothing but cry and whine and do everything in their power to not take responsibility for their own predicaments and blame the rest of the world. They also are completely unable to listen to any opposing view. In response to contrary opinions and e…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/15 06:07 PM
1

The subs rules are set out so that the Mods can control every aspect of the content of the sub and squash any and all dissent. The Sub's rules themselves are evidence of the sub being like a cult.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/15 05:58 PM
1

He initiated the contact. She beat him to the spot and then he elbowed her in the back to get past her. Then she turns and they start to grapple. He has complete control over her. She resists, get's one arm free, swings at him and misses badly. Then he unloads on her. Is he guilty of a battery? Nope. Is he guilty of exercising poor judgment? Yup! As a high profile participant in a very high profile multimillion dollar entrainment enterprise may such poor judgment effect his ability to continue t…
/r/MensRights07/07/15 10:14 PM
13

The laws are not biased.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/15 06:14 PM
3

There are other lessons here too: 1) Do some estate planning. Draft a will and have your attorney or a trusted third party keep possession of a copy; 2) Keep a living will appointing someone to make life or death decisions according to your wishes; 3) for god's sake go to the doctor when you're sick.
/r/TheRedPill09/04/15 12:19 AM
0

People drink to their inhibitions. That's kind of the whole point.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/15 05:46 PM
7

Zero of your points support the argument that loser men are the result of the sexual revolution. Zero. Nada. Not one. "A lot of biology points to that humans evolved longer penises because we are a more promiscuous society. And a larger penis is better for removing another male's sperm. Furthermore, other traits as the resilience of human sperm (Look up Sperm Wars) point to it as well." That's not evidence. That's some kooky bullshit theory that really doesn't make any sense whatsoever. Humans a…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/15 09:44 PM
-2

You are 100% wrong with your legal conclusions.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/15 08:37 PM
2

This is a silly story. In all likelihood the account is an UTMA account. This means that neither parent can take legally take dime one out of the account. Secondly, there is no way the judge is going to allow the wife access to the funds in the account for any purpose. Never going to happen.
/r/TheRedPill11/12/14 01:04 AM
5

So your advising your brother to lie to the police and/or commit perjury? What could go wrong?
/r/TheRedPill02/12/14 07:09 PM
3

When the going gets weird, the weird turn pro.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/14 08:19 PM
0

Most importantly is equates with not worrying about being Alpha.
/r/TheRedPill14/11/14 05:58 PM
-2

Headway? This has nothing to do with men's rights or TRP. Any person half way familiar with the law would know that the outcome was never in doubt.
/r/TheRedPill14/11/14 05:48 PM
1

Being needed equals responsibility. Be careful about that one.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/14 08:09 PM
2

Good god! What a shitty Strawman argument that has no meaning and makes you (the OP) look like a hamsetering twat. The "feminist organization didn't force anyone to do anything let alone force Indian women to sleep 16 to a room and work for $1.24 per hour. Does language mean anything to you? Do you actually believe yourself when say ridiculous shit like that? If you want to make a cohesive argument tot support your hatred of feminism, knock yourself out, but making intentionally misleading argum…
/r/TheRedPill04/11/14 10:14 PM
1

Rub some dirt on it.
/r/seduction28/10/14 06:46 PM
-3

It's not a romantic gesture and no significant group of men or women would ever argue as much. No one advocates for guys to make websites to get their girlfriends back. Classic strawman argument. I think the web site taking a collective shit on the dude is more interesting and worthy of comment. Ask a fishermen and not the fish? Fish cannot talk. If they could, I'm pretty certain that any fishermen worth his salt who be an effective fish interrogator. Not believing what people say at face value …
/r/TheRedPill22/10/14 06:36 PM
2

The nice guys and red pillars you speak of are caricatures. There are so many variations of people and attitudes that lumping people into either group is kind of useless.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/14 10:30 PM
-1

You keep using that word ("science"). I do not think it means what you think it means.
/r/TheRedPill17/10/14 06:55 PM
1

Men feeling entitled to sex is a strawman argument to begin with. Ironically, pointing out the silliness of that position is also a strawman argument.
/r/TheRedPill08/10/14 04:56 PM
1

False rape accusations are relevant. Girls who get too drunk being irresponsible is irrelevant.
/r/TheRedPill25/09/14 02:57 AM
2

"I think crimes should prosecuted only if the victim wants it" Fair enough, but the entirety of Western Civilization for the last 500 years disagrees.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/14 08:53 PM
2

You described empathy. Empathy and stoicisim are not mutually exclusive.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/14 10:56 PM
2

I'm a person. I'm on my own. And so are you.
/r/TheRedPill19/09/14 01:17 AM
3

Under the facts of the (Occidental) case, I'm pretty sure that this theory will not stand up in court. Either they are both guilty of sexual assault or they are both innocent.
/r/TheRedPill17/09/14 10:11 PM
1

Ironically, this thread topic is based on strawman arguments. "[T]he Order of the White Feather" Seriously, that's an example of what feminism is?
/r/TheRedPill15/09/14 05:36 PM
4

Another strawman argument. The "wall" is not a RP truth. It's generally accepted by everyone, particularly women. Sex and the City is a story, in large part, about women grappling with the wall. The girl in 50 shades of grey is 21/22 and whose character is supposed to be hot.
/r/TheRedPill11/09/14 10:26 PM
9

Funny, how the story is completely barren of any actual facts and has a misleading title. What the guy did was intentionally refuse a court order. The court ordered him to do something that he and his lawyer disagreed with. Fine. He and his lawyer may have been correct. But instead of following the order and then challenging the order later, they decided to tell the judge to go fuck herself. The judge got pissed and found him to be in contempt. So the real story is, and may be just as heinous fo…
/r/TheRedPill11/09/14 06:58 PM
7

"I'm still running into guys on some of the posts here who don't understand that there is no unconditional love from women. This is rule numero uno of TRP. Women will never "love" you like you want them to. They just don't have the ability to." The idea that only men can love is hilariously subjective and has no way of been objectively proved one way or the other. The correct statement would be: there is no unconditional love from anyone. And for TRP the only people of concern are women. Therefo…
/r/TheRedPill21/08/14 04:38 PM
1

It's probably not a good idea to just ignore what anyone has to say that you are involved with. I think the point is simply, actions speak louder than words.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/14 12:38 AM
0

The numbers are astounding. But that's because Gibson is overpaid. $850 million. Good god! In California the money would have just as easily gone in the other direction. She did pop out ten (10) kids.
/r/TheRedPill18/08/14 07:42 PM
-6

We're talking about Robin "fucking" Williams. He didn't kill himself over money issues. His backend participation, and royalties would keep in in the black. He has a life long, documented history of depression and substance abuse. The fact of the matter is that he was wealthy, famous and loved by all and he was still unhappy.
/r/TheRedPill13/08/14 10:36 PM
1

You apparently have no concept of logical reasoning. I never said why he committed suicide, I said why he didn't. For, example, I'm relatively sure he did not kill himself because he did not like you. Why am I so sure of that? Because there is zero plausible evidence that he knew you, didn't like you or that he would kill himself if he did. Just like there is zero evidence or even a plausible hypothetical basis to believe that his financial situation had anything to do with his death. The bottom…
/r/TheRedPill13/08/14 08:09 PM
0

The low estimate for his current worth is $50,000,000. He has four movies in the pipeline some with backend participation. He worked because his soul needed him to. At least for a while. He did not kill himself over paying $30,000,000 out to his two ex wives over the last 20 years. It had zero relation to his suicide.
/r/TheRedPill13/08/14 05:14 PM
-17

Good god! The twisted gymnastics used to turn Robin Williams death into a red pill example is pathetic. The very idea that his depression was rooted in what people complain about here is farcical. The estimates of Robins Williams wealth at his death are as high as $130,000,000 after his divorces.
/r/TheRedPill12/08/14 08:37 PM
-13

The advancement of civilization has feminized all of us to a degree. For example, the very idea of posting in TRP is a feminine endeavor. A pure Alpha wouldn't caught dead posting on an internet forum, particularly one complaining about women. Without the femnization of humankind, we'd all still be living in grass huts. Which wouldn't necessarily be a bad thing if one happened to live in Polynesia.
/r/TheRedPill01/08/14 04:58 PM
0

Whoopi is a feminist and her statement was not an accident.
/r/TheRedPill29/07/14 09:25 PM
0

Human instinct and sexual selection has taken millions of years of evolution to get to its current state. No social construct/movement is going to undo all that, it's embedded in our DNA. That's partially true. In the state of nature, attraction played very little of a role. Primitive males were fucking whomever they could they could out run and for tens of thousands of years. Civilization gave rise to the opportunity for attraction to play a significant role.
/r/TheRedPill08/07/14 08:30 PM
0

men and women are DIFFERENT. Very true! However, it is important to remember that men and women are much more alike than different.
/r/TheRedPill08/07/14 07:32 PM
0

LOL! Hispanics take over the US? What does that even mean? Are they going to impose some sort of UN-American ideology over the newly conquered? Or are these Hispanics already as American as you and I might be. In 2032, barring the collapse of civilization, the world will be considerably more Beta/feminized than it is now. The trajectory of human civilization has been steadily moving in that direction for thousands of years and suddenly it's going to turn around by 2032. Like I said if civilizati…
/r/TheRedPill28/06/14 01:35 AM
2

Men and women are different. Thus, different means superior and inferior depending on the circumstance and trait. However, men and women are more alike than they are different.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/14 09:28 PM
14

No shit she can have kids past 35, but they're most likely going to be retarded in some way. How can you complain about science and biological facts and then spit out gibberish like that? I guess you could be trolling, and if so, touche.
/r/TheRedPill24/06/14 04:33 AM
4

I disagree with your premise. Evidence?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/14 02:30 AM
0

Is this theory applicable to men's rights and TRP?
/r/TheRedPill20/06/14 10:00 PM
4

Stop hating yourself.
/r/seduction20/06/14 05:27 PM
1

LOL! You really need to get a grip. Primary custody and secondary custody is 51% to 49%. There is no actually difference in custodial time or allocation of child support.
/r/TheRedPill18/06/14 09:50 PM
1

In the statement the other person is already her partner. So she has already decided that the person is confident enough, or interesting enough, or good looking enough. Of course, the statement would be applicable prior to being bored.
/r/seduction12/06/14 08:52 PM
-21

The court system is universally anti-male. 100% false. I practice a little family law and that is not the case. If a party, female or male, loses custody, they more than often, did some fucked up shit of one sort or another. I've seen plenty of women lose their kids and pay spousal support and child support. What we have hear is an attitude of ignoring the court and the rules. If you do that, expect to get fucked. If show up and follow some very basic rules, you will never lose custody.
/r/TheRedPill12/06/14 07:34 PM
0

"Pregnancy is a huge investment and they are hardwired to run a background check." Really? How much influence do you think women had in selecting a mate prior to civilization? Being alpha means dominating other men for exclusive access to females, not impressing the females. Impressing females so that they choose you, is 100% beta.
/r/TheRedPill18/05/14 03:51 PM
0

LOL! Ayn Rand the favorite author of misguided, below the mean, teenage girls. Not a good start.
/r/TheRedPill16/05/14 04:39 PM
12

You don't respect yourself. You live in fear because you're weak. And as a result you need to place the blame on others instead of taking responsibility for yourself.
/r/TheRedPill16/05/14 04:10 PM
2

LOL! One of the funniest things around here, is the notion that human reproduction today has any real relation to human reproduction in the past. It gets even funnier when we contemplate how its change is speeding up and what it will look like in the future. Today we have surrogacy, IVF, sperm donation, egg donation and the ability to select and terminate. This whole notion of passing on genetic information is becoming antiquated, if not already, and will soon disappear entirely. We can already …
/r/TheRedPill16/05/14 04:00 PM
1

If you want to achieve your goals, you have to earn them first. And you do that by not being a push over and not having oneits. In the state of nature you only achieve that state by dominating all of the other competing males. In the state of civilization, you only achieve that state by dominating all of the other competing males. The difference is that to be successful, one for the most part, cannot just be a brute. One's game needs to be more subtle and varied.
/r/TheRedPill13/05/14 08:54 PM
-2

Because meatheads.
/r/TheRedPill09/05/14 11:36 PM
1

It sounds like first world whining by someone who is incapable of taking responsibility for their own actions.
/r/TheRedPill04/05/14 12:20 AM
-4

the suffering of men, Seriously? I'm sorry but that's just funny.
/r/TheRedPill01/05/14 11:25 PM
0

Its a harmless procedure, albeit a primitive one, that has no statitically signifigant downsides or upsides. It is a non issue except for certain crybaby, male redditors who want to blame their fucked up lives on their parents.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/14 11:58 PM
1

It absol;utley is the exact equivilent comparision. The clit is the female verison of the penis. After female circumcision the girl can never enjoy any sexual contact and never have an orgasm. She can still pee. Just like a male with his penis cut off.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/14 11:47 PM
0

"Cutting off parts of your children's genitals is clearly child abuse." Not in any jurisdiction in the entire United States of America.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/14 11:37 PM
0

"because their primary biological objective is to reproduce with high quality males." But in the state of nature, women played no role in this regard. It was men who decided who got to mate with the women. Thus, there is no genetic propensity for women to try and reproduce with high quality males because whomever they mate with is the highest quality male becuase the men sorted that out beforehand.
/r/TheRedPill30/04/14 11:33 PM
1

Voice of reason? All of these arguments are based on pure opinion and feelings. Male circumcision is a non issue. Either way it doesn't matter. Except for men who want to blame their parents for their shitty lives.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/14 09:19 PM
0

I'm pretty sure no one needs or asked for your blessing.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/14 09:18 PM
-1

Female circumcision is the equivalent of cutting off the entire penis. Your analogy is the basis for a false argument that has zero merit.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/14 09:17 PM
-2

Do you consider this an absolute ideal? For example, do paedophilic parents have the right to sexually abuse their babies? Another ridiculous question. Of course not. So when did you stop beating your wife?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/14 09:14 PM
-2

In a normative, common-law sense, a permanent, involuntary transgression of bodily autonomy like circumcision is a violation of rights. Except this is something that you just made up.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/14 09:13 PM
-2

Another strawman and materially distinguishable analogy. The facts are some physical punishments are not considered child abuse and circumcision is not considered child abuse. So the answer to your question, as a matter of law, is that parents can have their children circumcised and it is not considered child abuse.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/14 09:13 PM
-1

the babies' rights are being violated. Where are these rights articulated? Are babies rights being violated when their tonsils are removed? When they are indoctrinated into wacky religious traditions? Or political traditions?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/14 09:11 PM
2

It did answer your question in the affirmative.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/14 09:08 PM
0

FGM Completely 100% distinguishable and a ridiculous analogy. Female circumcision is the equivalent of cutting off the entire penis. Male circumcision does not involve cutting off the entire penis and it's effect is not reasonably analogous.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/14 09:07 PM
-1

"a person's right to bodily autonomy though" Please cite to a single political, religious or philosophical tradition that articulates this right that you are conferring upon babies whose parents are making decisions about their welfare.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/14 09:06 PM
-1

Calling your argument dishonest refers to the intellectual dishonesty of your arguments. Your analogies are laughable and do your own arguments a serious disservice.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/14 09:04 PM
-2

(whether on males or females) Completely distinguishable. Female Circumcision is the equivalent of cutting off the entire penis. How is that even remotely relevant? It's not.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/14 09:03 PM
-2

Nice strawman argument!
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/14 09:02 PM
-1

There is no brutality to it. Words have meaning. Try and use them correctly.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/14 09:02 PM
0

Every reason there is to be against female genital cutting is valid for males as well. Female circumcision which is the female equivalent of cutting off the entire penis.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/14 09:01 PM
0

I believe the preponderence of evidence is that (as most doctors agree) routine infant curcumcision is not a medical necessity, thus should be banned Citation please? And we're going to need the number of doctors in the survey and the number who vote that it should be banned.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/14 08:59 PM
-2

Your entire argument is based upon assumptions and the fact that you conveniently leave out opposing evidence.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/14 08:58 PM
-1

OMG there are differences of opinion abut something that really doesn't matter anyway.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/14 08:57 PM
-1

Circumcision became a fad to reduce the urge to masturbate. That's bullshit! Circumcision was around for 1000s of years prior to that. Not to mention circumcision has zero effect in slowing masturbation down.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/14 08:56 PM
-2

Edit: clarified the specific terms a bit. Some men have said it is insulting to say that circumcised men should feel "mutilated". I do not mean that to be the insinuation nor the purpose of my statement. But that is exactly the result of your position. If it is mutilation it is mutilation. Period. Your attempt to argue around that exposes the weakness of your position. Women who have their labia and Clitoris cut off are mutilated. Circumcision in not mutilation.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/14 08:54 PM
0

, it's well documented that a lot of nerve endings are in the foreskin But there is no evidence that this has any effect with sexual pleasure. The rest of the penis has more nerve endings.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/14 08:51 PM
-2

" child's right to bodily autonomy" There is no such right in a philosophical, religious or legal tradition. The foreskin is irrelevant. The only damage is the risk of the procedure.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/14 08:49 PM
1

An outdated primitive practice that has zero effect on sexual pleasure.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/14 08:47 PM
4

Do NOT follow this guy's advice. There are many states where this will NOT work and many situations where this will not work. A properly motivated attorney on the other side could very easily crush this guy and separate him from the stack of cash that he is so proud of.
/r/TheRedPill28/04/14 08:45 PM
0

Manipulating may be morally wrong when it is based upon an untruth. I think that is how most people view the term; when it is based upon a lie. Manipulation also happens to a Beta behavior.
/r/AlreadyRed26/04/14 12:30 AM
1

As a matter of fact, I have never visited Okcupid. I looked for 20 minutes. That I cannot get back mind you and found no examples.
/r/TheRedPill26/04/14 12:22 AM
0

I get it. This is why you're upset. Maybe you should provide an example.
/r/TheRedPill26/04/14 12:19 AM
0

I didn't mean it that way. I said it was fine and that you are perfect for each other. I merely expressed my own distaste for that sort of thing. Mainly to point out that some men don't want women to take care of them.
/r/TheRedPill26/04/14 12:18 AM
2

TRP is not monolithic. TRP doesn't encourage men to behave like Psychopaths.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/14 12:03 AM
3

Fact acceptance is not a real issue. No one will ever be pressured into to dating a fat girl.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/14 11:03 PM
1

Breakup with her. Move on. Next time make it clear, and repeat yourself, regular sex is a requirement for monogamy. That is non-negotiable. Unless you are ok with giving that part of your life up.
/r/TheRedPill25/04/14 10:09 PM
-5

You sound like his mom. Which is fine. It sounds like you are perfect for each other. But for me, gross. I like to take care of myself.
/r/TheRedPill25/04/14 10:04 PM
2

Or alternatively, one can be in a relationship where everyone pulls their own weight and makes their own decisions?
/r/TheRedPill25/04/14 10:02 PM
0

And that's why Indian women run the household and the man are all momma's boys?
/r/TheRedPill25/04/14 10:00 PM
2

In that situation its the man's fault. Only an idiot would conclude that giving a women a back rub will get a blow job.
/r/TheRedPill25/04/14 09:58 PM
2

No one says that being a doormat is good. Civilization is a how the weak control those who would have been strong under a different paradigm. But until civilization collapses from whatever that paradigm no longer exists.
/r/TheRedPill25/04/14 09:57 PM
-1

Apparently many people believe that basic respect for oneself is extreme and that it leads to mistreatment of women. What the actual fuck. No one believes that. That is a false argument.
/r/TheRedPill25/04/14 09:54 PM
-2

This is a classic strawman argument. I have never heard anyone call anyone shallow because they do not want to date an obese person. Never. And if someone did make that argument no one would go along with it.
/r/TheRedPill21/04/14 05:34 PM
1

The Alpha/Beta dichotomy is useless as the definitions are inconsistent and change from day to day.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/14 02:18 AM
6

If a man says it is important for him that his future wife has a low partner count, is that misogyny? But that isn't what happens at all. That is what is known as a strawman argument. What happens is: A girl with a high partner count is a slut, a whore and has no value except to by a cum bucket on the side. Meanwhile, there is nothing wrong with a guy attempting to have the maximum number of sexual encounters as humanly possible. "I have read more than one TRP - some seemingly virgins - saying t…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/14 09:09 PM
3

Sex is not owed. Depending on the jurisdiction actually. In some fault divorce jurisdictions, sexual abandonment is cause for divorce. Typically, monogamous relationships come with a mutual expectation of sex. If the frequency drops below what you want and or need, then you can move on or convince your partner to have more sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/14 09:52 PM
1

Authenticity.
/r/TheRedPill13/04/14 11:42 PM
1

Bias is pretty much irrelevant in legal advocacy. There's the law and the facts. Neither changes. Bias has a great effect on judgment though.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/14 11:40 PM
1

What's a feminist?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/14 11:38 PM
2

It doesn't.
/r/TheRedPill13/04/14 11:30 PM
3

"I come from a family that has been torn apart by adultery. I've been cheated on and played by a girl I was falling in love with." This is your fetish. All of your justification is hamstering because you believe your behavior to be wrong.
/r/seduction13/04/14 04:38 PM
4

Ironically, being so concerned about whores and betas that one produces such whiny manifesto is 100% beta behavior.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/14 02:16 AM
-7

The laws are biased against men in the western world Only if the men have shitty lawyers and are uninterested in defending themselves.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/14 03:46 PM
2

Marriage is trending towards obsolescence because people can survive just fine without it. Humans were never designed to mate for 20+ years. For a while it was necessary and if it worked out fine. But for many people it is just not needed.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/14 03:44 PM
-1

What a complete misrepresentation of what Kirsten Dunst said. Dunst is very clearly preaching TBP philosophy. The article is very porrly written and misleading. "“I feel like the feminine has been a little undervalued… We all have to get our own jobs and make our own money, but staying at home, nurturing, being the mother, cooking – it’s a valuable thing my mum created,” Dunst told this month’s edition of Harper’s Bazaar in the U.K. “And sometimes, you need your knight in shining armor. I’m sorr…
/r/TheRedPill12/04/14 03:42 PM
2

"If you follow the advice of the redpillers, you will find it does work, there's no doubt about it, you will have more success with attracting women, but what you might not realise it that it only works on certain types of women," This is 100% untrue. Being confident, assertive, not caring about the outcome, not showing weakness, standing up for yourself, avoiding oneits etc.. works with enough women to apply the rule to all of them. She really undermines her credibility with this statement. How…
/r/TheRedPill11/04/14 06:22 PM
-1

That lays the blame on others and is a roadblock to accepting responsibility for believing something that should not have been believed in the first place.
/r/TheRedPill11/04/14 06:08 PM
0

Because a lot people, including men, buy into some sort of complete nonsense as children. For some its religion for others its believing that they should be doormats. So, one day when the figured out that they were so gullible to believe this nonsense they get angry about it. For those of us who were never fooled in the first place, it's difficult to understand their anger.
/r/TheRedPill11/04/14 06:01 PM
1

Except that his empirical evidence is bogus.
/r/TheRedPill10/04/14 10:19 PM
0

"I can't remember the statistic but it was something like women are 10 times more likely to murder their own child than a man." I call bullshit too. I just read through the first 20 articles in your google search and that is not what any of the articles say. Many of the articles say more women kill their children than men but they don't give a percentage and they do not back it up with any comparisons to what men do. The correct answer is: gender plays little or no role in the deliberate killing…
/r/TheRedPill10/04/14 10:18 PM
2

Infanticide statistics are absolutely counted in homicide statistics. And your statistics are factually incorrect. Infanticide (or infant homicide) is the intentional killing of infants. Neonaticide, killing within 24 hours of a child's birth, is most commonly done by the mother whereas infanticide of a child more than one day old is slightly more likely to be committed by the father. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Infanticide#cite_note-Marks2009-1 Having said that, her comment about masculinity d…
/r/TheRedPill10/04/14 10:08 PM
2

Skateboarding, surfing and mountain climbing are all very good at teaching people how to control their fears.
/r/TheRedPill10/04/14 09:32 PM
-8

Which combat roles? Flying drones? Hacking banking computer systems? Nations and peoples are always trying to fight the last war, some like Putin, are trying to fight the war before the last war. Anyway, people, wars and everything else is evolving. One could have said that women shouldn't be manufacturing B25s too. And if they didn't you might be posting in German. Any negative effect of women in combat roles is not going to be strategic. It's just not. Would an average women be able to pick up…
/r/TheRedPill10/04/14 09:27 PM
-7

This article actually seems anti-TRP to me. Why is less marriage a bad thing? How many in the TRP sub want to run out and get married? Why is it a bad thing if women suffer the consequence of providing for themselves instead of using their youthful good looks to ensnare a man to provide for them?
/r/TheRedPill10/04/14 09:10 PM
-2

Or. One can be completely unconcerned with shit tests and go about your business.
/r/TheRedPill09/04/14 06:51 PM
2

So what is the alternative advice? Be a poser? Pretend to be someone you are not? The mom's advice is not mutually exclusive to the son trying to be a better person. Should she tell him to hit the gym and make lots of money? Or is this advice too obvious? "Sure mom but let me ask you this: Do you think a fisherman should ask one of the fish how to catch them?" This is an idiotic analogy. Of course the fisherman would ask fish this question if he could. The intelligence would be invaluable. The p…
/r/TheRedPill09/04/14 03:43 PM
1

Putin's not a very good example. Russia is a regional power that is desperately trying to hold on what it used to be by utilizing obsolete political maneuverings. Putin acts like he's winning because he's an idiot. He effectively purchased Crimea, land he already controlled, for about 1 trillion. Modern wars aren't fought with tanks, they're fought with banks.
/r/TheRedPill08/04/14 09:19 PM
1

The terms Alpha and Beta are so misused as to almost make them meaningless. In the vast majority of posts, Alpha = good and Beta = bad without regard to any defined meaning.
/r/TheRedPill08/04/14 09:04 PM
1

It would help if there was some sort of minimum consistency in the use of the terms Beta and Alpha. Everyone has both qualities. Everyone. The existence of subreddit itself is largely a Beta phenomena. The TRP mission, if it has one and as I see it, is to help those whose Beta qualities are out of balance in relation to their necessity for Alpha qualities. Marriage is not what necessarily eroded Al Bundy's Alpha qualities as much a time and age. In the state of nature, the Alpha bull cedes his d…
/r/TheRedPill05/04/14 06:41 PM
1

More so to solve problems. Particularly, medical students (physicians).
/r/TheRedPill21/03/14 10:41 PM
1

More importantly weak power and strong power.
/r/TheRedPill21/03/14 10:25 PM
2

Importantly, all of this is hearsay. We do not know what she said, what the father heard or the context for any of this.
/r/TheRedPill13/03/14 07:25 PM
9

It doesn't help that the buzz words are constantly misused.
/r/TheRedPill07/03/14 07:46 PM
0

Your conclusion is completely clouded by confirmation bias. How old was your mother? Was she capable of raising you in a manner equal to or better than the manner in which you were raised? What kind of person is yous bio dad? Did he dump your mom so he could spin plates?
/r/TheRedPill06/03/14 06:52 PM
1

That has zero to do with whether or not there is community property in your state.
/r/TheRedPill27/02/14 12:06 AM
1

That was neither said nor implied from my comment.
/r/TheRedPill27/02/14 12:04 AM
5

"You're giving way too much of a fuck." Words to live by.
/r/seduction20/02/14 03:59 AM
0

Married money is earned money.
/r/TheRedPill19/02/14 11:12 PM
1

It's fake!
/r/TheRedPill16/02/14 04:51 PM
0

Community property isn't really an issue unless your a professional athlete or top their professional of some sort. The issue is spousal support. California not so good. Texas very good.
/r/TheRedPill14/02/14 06:08 PM
1

Not according to the case cited. Clearly, blowing your wad on the floor would not be considered a gift. Of course things may get sticky depending on whose floor that wad is blown on to.
/r/TheRedPill14/02/14 12:41 AM
3

But you get to sue the woman for Intentional Infliction of emotional Distress. "An appeals court said a man can press a claim for emotional distress after learning a former lover had used his sperm to have a baby."
/r/TheRedPill12/02/14 10:00 PM
4

"An appeals court said a man can press a claim for emotional distress after learning a former lover had used his sperm to have a baby."
/r/TheRedPill12/02/14 09:59 PM
-11

Don't ejaculate into a women that you are not ok getting pregnant.
/r/TheRedPill12/02/14 09:57 PM
3

Many states have what are known as "anti-heart balm" laws that preclude any cause of action for breach of a promise to marry. California has such a law. "No cause of action arises for: [¶] (a) Alienation of affection. [¶] (b) Criminal Conversation. [¶] (c) Seduction of a person over the age of legal consent. [¶] (d) Breach of promise of marriage." (Civ. Code, § 43.5.).
/r/TheRedPill10/02/14 10:48 PM
1

But so generally does one's desire for hot women.
/r/TheRedPill04/02/14 08:24 PM
2

"The problem isn't us, its the LIES." I disagree. I think the main problem is believing the untruths or logical fallacies. I'm sorry, but if someone believed any of the following, or made them up inside their own head, then they have a problem believing things that are objectively idiotic. One needs to develop critical reasoning skills.
/r/TheRedPill04/02/14 08:18 PM
5

[Achievement of any kind] demands sacrifice and ... a willingness to embrace suffering.
/r/TheRedPill02/02/14 08:26 PM
1

Alpha an Beta are defined differently from one post and comment to the next. Thus, we constantly have to decipher how each poster or commenter is using the terms in order to participate in the conversation.
/r/TheRedPill02/02/14 05:03 PM
1

Good post. Should have a disclaimer though. This is pretty advanced. Having intimate conversations with the opposite sex is its own reward and feels good so there is a danger in going to the well one too many times. Thus, be careful and not over do it. Don't overshare.
/r/seduction30/01/14 03:31 PM
2

In both shows the audience is supposed to laugh at and root for the main character. The ill behavior of the characters in both shows are portrayed in a manner to be mocked. The difference between the shows is that Danny McBride is a comedic genius and Dunham is a hack.
/r/TheRedPill30/01/14 03:18 PM
5

That's not the situation here though. OPs title is misleading. The situation wasn't that he "can't" get with her friend, it was that she did not like the idea and actively hindered it. Her friend was into him. Therefore, no pre-selection bias. A more accurate title would have been something like, [Evidence] that "if you're 'friends' with a girl [who won't date you, said friend will likely cockblock] you [if you try to] get with her other friends.
/r/TheRedPill29/01/14 03:00 PM
2

All he said was that if a state legislature were to pass the law the corresponding state court would strike it down.
/r/MensRights18/04/09 03:33 PM
2

He's probably right about this one.
/r/MensRights18/04/09 03:32 PM
1

Because men and women are different and women cannot commit the same crime. And the book here doesn't address statutory rape anyway. Which is what I think you are talking about. Consent is not the issue in statutory rape, but rather, age is the issue.
/r/MensRights18/04/09 03:29 PM
1

Because a women really cannot rape a man in that sort of situation. Their are exceptions of course. I suppose it could be by deceit if it was dark and the man thought it was someone else. The guy could be tied up and force fed Viagra. But not in a situation where they could both cry rape.
/r/MensRights18/04/09 03:28 PM
2

Chuck Berry would take a picture of him and the girl before they had sex, smiling in bed, with a Polaroid.
/r/MensRights18/04/09 03:24 PM
3

"Most rapes are of the acquaintance variety, and consent often is the sole issue in dispute in a rape trial. Under this professor's plan, if a woman alleges rape, nonconsent would be presumed, and the man would be required to show by a preponderance of the evidence that the act was consensual." As if people don't change their minds about whether sex was a good idea or not after the fact.
/r/MensRights18/04/09 03:23 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter