TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

rapist666 Archive

View 0 posts and 24 comments by rapist666 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

if you're arguing that men and women shouldn't have sex outside of marriage you're in a small and shrinking minority. In argumentation theory, an argumentum ad populum (Latin for "appeal to the people") is a fallacious argument that concludes a proposition to be true because many or most people believe it. In other words, the basic idea of the argument is: "If many believe so, it is so."
/r/TheRedPill09/03/14 12:30 AM
3

Here's her trying judo on a larger man: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=glCAiJpfAFE
/r/TheRedPill06/03/14 12:51 PM
12

It's as if people aren't aware what the Gracies proved in MMA by showing how a small grappler could skillfully force a huge and powerful fighter into submission. Grapplers take the fight to the ground and then it's quickly over. It takes a good athlete years to learn grappling defense. A strong novice gets brutalized by a weak but highly experienced grappler. Some say her armbar is the best in MMA, including the men. Floyd doesn't understand judo and might not know to tap before his arm was mang…
/r/TheRedPill06/03/14 12:51 PM
2

It sounds like eliminating men and white people is their plan to achieve this social justice.
/r/MensRights28/11/13 02:15 PM
7

We won't have True Equality until life expectancy rates become identical. Men need to stop working so hard and take more naps so they can enjoy a long and relaxed life. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Life_expectancy#Gender_differences
/r/MensRights03/09/13 11:43 AM
2

There will naturally be some quantity of bad. It's more a question of whether it should continue unimpeded, dominate, or be reduced with favoring of the good.
/r/MensRights12/01/13 11:25 PM
0

Of course, one favors the traits they want more of. If you favor the intelligent, you are discriminating against favoring stupid people. If you favor the beautiful and healthy, you discriminate against the ugly and sickly. If we really don't care, or prefer having stupid, ugly, sickly people, then we can shrug and let that happen so that no one is offended by a preference for higher quality human traits.
/r/MensRights12/01/13 10:32 PM
1

What sort of "due process" do you imagine? Humanity gains by preserving and increasing its best characteristics, even if an ugly, stupid, immoral person feels they are being judged against.
/r/MensRights12/01/13 10:30 PM
5

You can't just have your 'good' without removing your 'bad'. You don't have to remove bad, you can simply favor the good and thereby increase its proportion.
/r/MensRights12/01/13 10:28 PM
-1

Most people agree that intelligence, beauty, health, and good character are positive qualities. As they are genetically based, our governments could subsidize the expansion of such qualities rather than permitting their decline. human rights and human decency There is no need to take away rights or decency. If we promote and favor what is good, we can have more of it.
/r/MensRights12/01/13 08:36 PM
-7

I'm not trolling. Opposing eugenics is saying you don't want quality.
/r/MensRights12/01/13 06:50 PM
-11

What is the argument against eugenics? The human race benefits from having more high quality people and fewer low quality people. Imagine the potential we'd have with just a slight improvement in quality over a few generations.
/r/MensRights12/01/13 06:31 PM
2

The joke is an old one, but a recognized market value for monetized sex combined with the pretension of virtue is ripe comedy fodder.
/r/MensRights08/01/13 03:52 AM
2

A gentleman is seated next to an attractive and proper young lady and engages her in conversation. Suddenly he says, "Would you sleep with me for a million dollars?" The lady blushes, but agrees that she would. "Well, would you sleep with me for five dollars?" "Certainly not!" she says, now offended. "Just what kind of woman do you think I am?" "Madam, we've already established what you are. Now we're just haggling over the price."
/r/MensRights07/01/13 01:21 PM
0

Virtue is most importantly a disposition of one's whole character. Those who are promiscuous rarely have accompanying traits that are thought of positively -- no surprise!
/r/MensRights07/01/13 12:37 PM
-2

It depends what your notion of virtue is. Perhaps as Western civilization has declined, few people are familiar with what virtue means. Diseases, medicine, and condoms are practical issues dealing with physical consequences of promiscuity and aren't very relevant to promiscuity or virtue. Assume there was no disease or pregnancy concern and the issue of virtue lost through promiscuity would remain.
/r/MensRights07/01/13 03:29 AM
-3

A woman retains virtue at a low number of partners, but would not after promiscuity leading to a high number of partners. The specific number is not very important, as the promiscuity signals the loss of virtue, and her loss of virtue is not measured by how effectively she has acted out her promiscuity.
/r/MensRights07/01/13 03:01 AM
1

A worker should not be interested in upsetting the work environment. It's easy to do what the boss says regardless of your personal opinion about the world. Businessmen are excellent because they are so boring and predictable with their single focus on making money. It makes dealing with a work environment simple and avoids inventing fictional motives for their decisions.
/r/MensRights22/08/12 01:22 AM
2

People have been fired for all kinds of things. Someone has to go out of their way to let their sexuality, religion, or political leanings known. If you earn money for a business they won't be quick to fire you.
/r/MensRights21/08/12 11:16 PM
2

Business people only care about making money. If an employee is costing them money, that employee is acting contrary to the goals of the company and has to be fired. If an employee is making them money, they have to act wildly and be disruptive to be fired. Business people don't care about your politics or sexuality unless you speak about them loudly and tell everyone. Even a heterosexual screaming about how much he enjoys certain acts would be fired for being disruptive, but anyone who keeps pr…
/r/MensRights21/08/12 10:23 PM
2

So you're saying business people prefer to lose money and fire highly productive transgender people because of a crazy irrational hatred of their lifestyle?
/r/MensRights21/08/12 09:32 PM
2

Humans are abundant. Most people are ignorant and lack critical thinking skills. Why would anyone expect positive encounters from uninformed and ill-considered opinions?
/r/MensRights21/08/12 04:21 PM
2

That's one way to make everyone equal.
/r/MensRights21/08/12 04:11 PM
2

It's important to bow before all human beings because they are special.
/r/MensRights21/08/12 04:00 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter