TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

raredare359 Archive

View 7 posts and 137 comments by raredare359 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

Agreed. Its a numbers game. The more you approach the more you stand a chance at making it happen. If it does happen - don't get oneitis and maintain frame otherwise you'll "lose control" and get your heart broken.
/r/askTRP08/08/15 06:17 PM
1

Whites that have been around a lot of brown people are racist to brown people? Does that say something about US - or does it say something about brown people. Who knows. If you're implying that white women not fucking you as being "racist" then you are wrong. Simple as that. Stop focusing on race and focus on what you can control. Do I wish I were 2 inches taller? Absolutely. Do I consider people who have a stigma against 5'10 guys as "heightist"? No.
/r/askTRP08/08/15 06:08 PM
1

There is no agenda. By all means - pursue white women all you want. If you want to believe you'll have similar success as equally comparable white men then go ahead. I think an optimistic state of mind is a good one to have. I prefer a "hope for the best, prepare for the worst" type of approach to my life - hence why I gave you an honest answer, not one you want to hear. I think its easier to kick the obsession with white women and be open minded to other races, but apparently not. If my agenda …
/r/askTRP08/08/15 06:02 PM
2

Yeah - online dating gives all women a really inflated sense of ego because they often don't realize that ALL women are getting this type of response. However, the advice you gave is incorrect. Practice abundance mentality. Lower your standards and swipe right on any semi passable girl just to see if you get ANY matches. You don't need to talk to them. Men should RAISE their standards and only swipe right on girls they're actually attracted to so that the cycle of ego-feeding stops. However, thi…
/r/askTRP08/08/15 03:56 PM
1

I'm going to be honest with you. I personally do not think an Indian with a high SMV stands a chance at a really hot white women. Really hot white women can literally have any guy in the world if they play their cards right. They will not fuck around with a high SMV Indian guy when they can have a high SMV white guy. I don't fully understand the reasonings behind it. I really don't. You may be able to fuck a really high SMV white girl ONCE but after that I think it's impossible. The only race ca…
/r/askTRP08/08/15 06:52 AM
2

If you are going after white girls - you will never experience the same results. You can improve, sure, but you will never be as successful with white women as white men are. Anyone who says otherwise is lying to you. I'd rather keep it real. On that note, I have a serious question. Why do men from other races focus solely on white women? Why does an Indian man not try and game women from his own race? I feel like it has to be something way more than just white women being the majority...it seem…
/r/askTRP08/08/15 01:13 AM
2

My sister has a Tinder account and your ratios are off. She matches every single time - except every once in a blue moon, but at which point they usually end up matching and it just means he hadn't seen her profile yet. (Her words, not mine). She's an attractive girl, yes, but all girls experience ratios much higher than 5 out of 20.
/r/askTRP08/08/15 01:05 AM
3

Send picture and I'll get to it when I can.
/r/askTRP06/08/15 10:09 PM
2

Interesting - I've always had good results with lemons. I did a Google search to see if there was any truth to that and the first result on Acne.org rates it a 4/5. The reviews also frequently mention a reduction in acne scars, which is interesting because that is his problem area. In my opinion - I'd at least try it. http://www.acne.org/lemon-juice-applied-topically-reviews-73/
/r/askTRP06/08/15 09:25 PM
2

I do think I have a tendency to type with more emotion to help get a particular point across. For example - up above I said: "they totally understand why women are hypergamous etc..." I don't think a straight guy would casually use the word "totally", but I think I subconsciously did it so that I could sound like a female. I have no idea, I'm overthinking this. It's hard to articulate but basically gay men are exactly like men but I'm noticing that we have an ability to "flip the switch" and tur…
/r/askTRP06/08/15 08:36 PM
2

I didn't rate him a 10. I gave him a 4 to start out while also providing recommendations for possibly getting up to a 7. My scorecards are legit and not taking into account his ego in any way. I will talk about those when I make the post, thanks for the recommendation.
/r/askTRP06/08/15 04:26 PM
1

I've never had acne scars so at this point I have no personal recommendations. If it were me - my first thought would be to try sleeping with a little bit of olive oil. Maybe try some lemon juice. I just asked my mother (who at 48 years old still gets cat called and is very in tune with beauty shit) and she recommended raw tomatoes. If it's not immediately obvious, we stick with natural products that are usually more effective, cost less, and are well reviewed because of results (not marketing).
/r/askTRP06/08/15 04:24 PM
3

I'm speaking in generlizations of course but for the most part - if you see a guy as a hair stylist (not a barber) you can probably assume he's gay. If he's not gay, he's still a guy and I would trust his recommendations over a females because they have all sorts of motives when giving feedback that have absolutely nothing to do with maximizing your sexual appeal.
/r/askTRP06/08/15 04:20 PM
2

I do it over my whole body too. It would help a lot with back acne also if you can reach your shoulders. I personally do not do it on my dick and balls.
/r/askTRP06/08/15 04:19 PM
14

I could possibly create a little website where myself and a few gay friends can provide feedback to men through a red pill lens. I'm very busy but I'll consider it. I'm not opposed to another subreddit but I would imagine that turning into a shit show with people seeking advice all over Reddit. There would be an influx of advice that would NOT be recommended. I lack an ability to give suggestions outside of a Red Pill lens because I simply cannot tell a guy something would look good without expl…
/r/askTRP06/08/15 04:13 PM
3

Sure. I have a lot in the inbox so don't nag me if I don't respond, I'll get to them all in time but I have a life outside of Reddit so keep that in mind.
/r/askTRP06/08/15 04:09 PM
13

Depends on the style. If you're doing a close tight fade (i.e. 3 on the top, 1 on the sides) then I recommend getting a regular haircut to keep it fresh. Depending on the person, that can mean once a week or twice a month. A really tight fade is extremely masculine and can make a guy with a "beta bux" appearance take on a much more masculine role. You will notice an immediate change in the way people respond to you if you're rocking a military fade. Fades that are grown out don't look good so it…
/r/askTRP06/08/15 04:07 PM
28

Welcome. Stay involved and really make an effort to learn. TRP is not a hate group - it's a community that cultivates a methodology of viewing the world through a REALISTIC lens outside of the brainwashing that modern society attempts to sell us on. It will not only change your approach to women but it will force you to do some hard calculations about your own place and value to society (and subsequently women). You will come out a new man and I promise you, TRP will improve all aspects of your …
/r/askTRP06/08/15 03:52 PM
6

In this case, no. Retaining some imperfections is hotter than too-obviously eliminating them...it promotes a "I don't give a fuck attitude." If your eyebrows really are an issue and could benefit from a clean up, don't overdo it and play it safe. Well done eye brows that aren't overly shaped can make a HUGE impact on the look of your face. As a gay man who is the polar opposite of the stereotype you might assume - I specifically and explicitly tell my straight barber to do my eyebrows but not ma…
/r/askTRP06/08/15 06:26 AM
5

Yeah I definitely type gay. I don't act, sound, or look gay in real life but I guess that makes sense because being gay is a mental thing. Not to get philosophical, just trying to analyze how I could be so masculine in real life while still clearly typing like a gay dude. Thanks for the brain puzzle.
/r/askTRP06/08/15 06:07 AM
3

I agree. I hope he sees it as well.
/r/askTRP06/08/15 06:04 AM
82

Alright. I have some ideas about what to talk about. Stay tuned.
/r/askTRP06/08/15 06:02 AM
3

Ya fire away I'll get to it when I can.
/r/askTRP06/08/15 05:50 AM
17

Yes- very. It made me realize that straight men often have a difficult time communicating in "hamster" while I've noticed gay people are able to switch between the two "languages" of men and women at ease. Meaning, we're able to see both sides of the perspective very easily because we're familiar with both mentalities. Gay men speak the language of men, because they are exactly like men, but they also speak fluent hamster because they totally understand why women would be hypergamous and have hi…
/r/askTRP06/08/15 05:41 AM
6

I am sure your recommendations work very well but I consider dermatologists to be extreme. I also can't imagine taking medication and I'm not a fan of non-natural products. So, for example, you referenced St. Ive's apricot scrub which is a product I would never use because the same thing can be accomplished by the exfoliating glove - and I have yet to have a "micro tear". I mean nothing offensively by this, honest, but a micro tear sounds like something I would read in a Cosmopolitan magazine al…
/r/askTRP06/08/15 05:35 AM
1

What? This is terrible. Pick up lines aren't as important as everyone thinks they are. If you have a good profile, you can send the bitch a typo and she'll respond if she thinks you're worth it. Pick up lines do nothing but make you look desperate for her attention....because that is literally what they represent, a desperate attempt at getting her attention.
/r/askTRP06/08/15 01:49 AM
1

As an attractive 25 year old gay male who receives a fuck-load of messages from would-be suitors each with their own variations of "clever pick up lines".... I would roll my eyes at this one and silently whisper to myself...in your dreams. You can reasonably expect that to be her response if she's above a 7.
/r/askTRP06/08/15 01:47 AM
1

You can bounce back from sending her fake pictures. Show up, act like it's totally normal, and if she calls you out on the fake pictures be like: "I was dating a girl at the time and wanted to scope out the scene before I broke up with her. I don't take Tinder seriously." Or.... "I had a girlfriend and I wasn't taking your profile seriously." However, on that note, something tells me you sent her pictures of a good looking guy and you're the opposite and probably won't have the confidence to pul…
/r/askTRP06/08/15 01:44 AM
1

Dark hair and dark eyes usually correlates to darker skin as well. A quick Google search brings up the following: "Tall, dark and handsome is a very old trope. In the 20th century Hollywood context, 'dark' was likely to mean a man of European descent who was physically strong and had been exposed to sun and air, a man who worked outside, with building, agriculture, or the military. A so-called 'man's man.'"
/r/askTRP03/08/15 02:18 PM
1

I would say at least a couple months. First impressions are a big deal. Even if she texts you in a few days, I would remain aloof. Otherwise...not only do you look boring, you will look socially awkward because she has to text you to give you the "green light.
/r/askTRP25/07/15 11:24 PM
0

If you're 5 feet - money is very important. You will never do it for them "sexually" as height is their most important factor.
/r/askTRP25/07/15 11:11 PM
2

Honestly - I'd fall off her radar for a bit. Cast her to the side, reel her back in at a later date, and play it off as though you were busy. She'll assume you're hanging /w another Tinder chick and it'll raise your value. Right now you look boring. Cut her off and come back later.
/r/askTRP25/07/15 11:10 PM
2

I don't know why you're putting feminism and gay people in the same boat. Back in Ancient Rome/Greece, before birth control and condoms, men were hooking up with men ALL the time. Bisexuality was considered the DEFAULT sexuality. Men fucked men for pleasure and women were "kept around" for reproductive and family purposes. Did they enjoy having sex with women? Absolutely. But that usually resulted in child after child and a man's form of release could only be found in the form of another man. Ve…
/r/TheRedPill21/07/15 11:35 PM
1

You're correct about the self-respecting part. I've seen some high quality guys crack under their game though (but in his defense, my female friends are good looking as well). It boils down to the following: a 7/10 female playing emotionally unavailable combined with an attitude problem similar to 8/10. The male, a 7/10 himself, becomes fooled into thinking she is an 8/10, and thus higher value than he, and subsequently becomes obsessed. It has something to do with a being rude and acting like h…
/r/askTRP23/06/15 03:07 AM
1

It's effective. My female friends pull this stunt all day every day. Not subconsciously either....they actively discuss how effective it is with each other. Straight out of their playbook and now here on Reddit for your enjoyment. Source: gay male
/r/askTRP23/06/15 02:29 AM
1

I assumed this was a female posting for advice. I can see how it can apply to male to male relationships, though. My comment would never work between two straight members of the same sex.
/r/askTRP23/06/15 02:15 AM
0

To an extent, yes. But to really fuck with him and drive him even crazier....treat him like shit when he treats you good. He'll keep treating you better in an attempt to win you over. He'll start taking it personal and intrinsically lower his self-value , while yours will continue to rise. He'll fall deeper and deeper into your trap. If he calls you out and asks you why you're being shitty, play dumb and act like he's crazy. "What are you talking about? Why are you being so dramatic / obsessive …
/r/askTRP23/06/15 02:07 AM
1

Confident women also want this lucky guy to have one woman, many babies, and much less in his bank account. Have fun, guys.
/r/askTRP12/06/15 01:49 AM
1

Straight men are being oppressed. I've been watching it happen and it's getting worse. You won't admit you're oppressed because then you'll sound like all the other "oppressed" women and people. I can understand that....but their fake oppression is numbing you to the reality of your own oppression. Newsflash - there is nothing more alpha than for yourself on social media. If you have to start saying some "misogynistic" shit then so be it. Men won't comment often but when they see it they'll 'lik…
/r/askTRP12/06/15 01:37 AM
1

Any logical person would be okay with this. On the other hand, who would ever offer this? Maybe a "1" for "1" situation. I don't believe in monogamy and I'm a fan of open relationships. 3 for 1 just screams low self esteem. I can't even imagine the level of disgusting it would require a women to be before this would ever happen. Open, healthy, non-dramatic marriages with plenty of sex and level headed communication is reserved for gay males.
/r/askTRP12/06/15 01:10 AM
1

Good point. I should have made this in the general "AskReddit".
/r/askTRP09/06/15 06:43 PM
0

Boston, MA.
/r/askTRP09/06/15 06:41 PM
1

Anyone who goes out of their way to appear alpha on the internet, rather than participate in an honest discussion, is not a true alpha. You're a try-hard. Keep reading, bud, you have a lot to learn.
/r/askTRP08/06/15 08:44 PM
0

I believe you're the one raging, not I. Passing the blame. Another standard feminist move. Someone, please, revoke his TRP ENDORSED tag.
/r/askTRP08/06/15 08:43 PM
0

You are a moron. You remind me of a nazi feminist. You think you're making good points and the rest of us are laughing at you. Good day, gentlemen.
/r/askTRP07/06/15 06:47 PM
3

It's not a stupid question. He's just being argumentative to sound intelligent. I'm noticing more pro-male comments on social media too. They're rare but when they happen a lot of men 'like' them and make them more visible. If people keep doing that these views are headed mainstream. From Red Pill to Men's Rights Movement.
/r/askTRP06/06/15 09:25 PM
10

Shut the fuck up. You have got to be kidding me. -heads to Google-
/r/TheRedPill05/06/15 03:41 PM
82

He can win against laws, taxes, and payouts. But no one can win with modern day women.
/r/TheRedPill05/06/15 06:03 AM
6

That is much harder to enforce. To allow the man to dictate how it is spent would provide him with a "tool to control women". That's how it would be argued, at least. Financial abortion is the easiest way for a man to cut ties without ruining her ability to choose the direction of her own life.
/r/TheRedPill05/06/15 02:55 AM
13

What a strange perspective. Laws can be changed...especially when it becomes immediately obvious how terrible the state of marriage is. I don't think these pro-male opinions are too far from the mainstream at this point. If a publication like Daily Mail confidently ran this piece, and it has over 3,000 comments, blah blah blah, our views about the "state of man" extends well beyond just the manosphere. Who would have thought that women would earn the right to vote? Blacks were kept as slaves for…
/r/TheRedPill05/06/15 02:53 AM
40

Well then the law should be changed. If the child support is for the child and not her, then the ability to financially abort a baby will force the mother to make more intelligent decisions about who she has a child with. Essentially, women have no responsibility or incentive to ensuring the child is raised in a good home. If she wants to have a child with a man who "financially aborts" it, then she is making the decision for the child. If a women can unenroll her child from private school so th…
/r/TheRedPill05/06/15 02:32 AM
80

Yeah, I was thoroughly impressed with this article. I'm usually hesitant with anything published by Daily Mail too. I'm wondering if the author is familiar with this subreddit? He argues our "counterfeit masculinity" community was a response to all of this. Can't say I don't agree with him. It saw young men compensate with a ‘counterfeit masculinity’ of strength, anger and violence, often combined with sexual prowess.' Meanwhile, young women ‘act out a skewed version of femininity that prioritis…
/r/TheRedPill05/06/15 02:06 AM
2

This.
/r/askTRP23/05/15 04:45 AM
5

It sounds "creepy" but he's right. Eliminate "can I" from your vocab. Everything about your post screams "beta". I usually hate throwing that word out but in this particular case you have a lot of reading to do. I suggest the side bar material. To you, it's creepy. To her, it's alpha dick she can't get enough of. TRP will change your life but you need to give it more time. Keep learning.
/r/askTRP23/05/15 04:38 AM
2

It's more work than it's worth, especially if you're not actually into them. Gold digging women don't have to do much. They don't need to "cuddle" or "fake emotion" or any of those other complicated things to drain a dude's wallet. The only thing a girl needs to do is spread her legs. Depending on how hot they are, they might not even need to do that. Just the "hope" of getting some nookie is enough to get most guys to spend serious amounts of cash. However, if you reverse the roles and try to '…
/r/askTRP15/05/15 05:57 AM
1

I think a lot of people here are going to shit on you and tell you to stop bitching, being beta, etc. However, I think you're correct in your assumption. The harsh reality is that the white women you're ACTUALLY into are more likely to date other white guys / occasionally a black guy. illimaybeois below laid out a very accurate description of the white women who are more open to it. I don't think it's totally impossible but it's definitely harder. I guess it depends on how "exotic" looking you R…
/r/askTRP15/05/15 05:22 AM
1

How very manly of you to not identify as gay...but rather a "same sex attracted man". Not. You remind me of all the desperate old men who use being married as a pick up line....as if an inability to be honest with yourself is some sort of turn on. It makes complete sense as to why you have such asinine views about my " hysterical and homosexual response". Insecurity. News flash, kid, the red pill is all about not giving a fuck and maintaining high value. You are clearly self conscious and should…
/r/TheRedPill02/05/15 07:35 AM
11

I feel the same way about taking shrooms, another psychodelic. I grew so much from that experience. I suddenly understood mental illness because I realized our "reality" is also affected by a particular chemical balance of the brain. Steve Jobs himself believes taking LSD was one of the most important days of his life. To the OP, thanks for writing this. Great stuff.
/r/TheRedPill25/04/15 03:51 AM
1

That is a great way to put it.
/r/TheRedPill20/04/15 10:53 PM
1

I think the site you are talking about is called "The Dirty". I also think your post was really interesting. It really does serve as a quick and easy SMV boost. The people who benefit more are the general society, not her boyfriend who wants to rub on some warm and realistic breasts. Women are aware that they feel different but they will get them anyways. They're doing it for general attention...not their man. All signs point to avoid / approach with caution if looking for a LTR.
/r/TheRedPill11/04/15 09:31 PM
1

An aging population would eventually outnumber the people who support it. It doesn't matter what you invest in, it's simple economics. The people who require care and assistance outnumber the ones who can provide it. Capitalism cannot exist without a growing population.
/r/TheRedPill11/04/15 09:11 PM
1

So, if it doesn't affect you immediately or directly then we should ignore it? Not trying to be difficult, I'm just trying to understand your logic. I would never waste time protesting and holding up signs for the sake of awareness but to at least express some sort of concern for the situation seems reasonable. If the Red Pill is teaching you nothing but mastery over women then that's a shame. I suppose that's the 'real' purpose of this sub. I'm just surprised because when I stopped being a vict…
/r/TheRedPill11/04/15 09:10 PM
1

You can't enjoy the decline without switching over to socialism. Capitalism is dependent on a growing population. Not only that, but "having the mom and dads back" usually involves the dad getting fucked over. Female birth control doesn't work to your benefit.
/r/TheRedPill11/04/15 07:18 PM
0

I find that a very strange mentality to have. You've managed to rise to the second level of consciousness - meaning, pussy has less importance in your life. You're on the "second tier" of living in reality and have risen above primal instincts. However - you're not truly conscious. Someone who is would understand that pussy isn't the center of the universe but can still accept that continuing our species is just as important as protecting our bank account. We can overpower our animal instincts a…
/r/TheRedPill11/04/15 06:59 PM
0

"I understand it just fine, I just don't care. You go try to save society, I'll work on things that benefit me. I get all the benefit of your work and all the benefit of my work." I wonder if that is what Roman's thought before their society collapsed. At least, in retrospect, it was just Rome that fell. This time around it's our entire species on the decline.
/r/TheRedPill11/04/15 06:09 PM
1

In the short term, sluts being sluts works out. Men love pussy. In the long term, however, society as a whole appears to be suffering. Women are born with a reproductive organ that gives them a lot of power (we need food, water, pussy) but it's supposed to be balanced out with pregnancy. By allowing them to be sluts without getting pregnant, women win. Not men. At least not the MAJORITY of men. Yes, because they substitute less attractive men with RICHER men. They seek beta providers, not alpha …
/r/TheRedPill11/04/15 05:42 PM
1

Our economy depends on a growing population. Growing population numbers result in more innovations in health care, technology, science, etc. We can't colonize more than one planet if we aren't innovating....and we need to colonize two plants as a means of protecting our existence. "Who gives a fuck about population numbers?" - says the dinosaurs
/r/TheRedPill11/04/15 05:39 PM
-2

No, I'm saying ban birth control so that we can restore balance to society. And yes, I agree, it's better to not have kids with these women if you can help it. Which is why I was arguing that male birth control would make more sense. We can't just have a free for all with kids but female birth control appears to be causing a lot of problems. P.S. As for the "thousand page post" part, I appreciate well thought out posts with a lot of content and interesting ideas. If you want a simple minded post…
/r/TheRedPill11/04/15 05:35 PM
3

This is mind boggling. TRP will definitely be banned, someone start prepping.
/r/TheRedPill11/04/15 01:50 AM
2

Just act like nothing is wrong. She'll be thrown for a loop.
/r/askTRP05/04/15 02:31 AM
4

Indoor gardening. It sounds weird - but I love to tinker /w shit and improve the look of my home and I found indoor gardening was the only way I could get it out of my system without having to a buy a house.
/r/askTRP05/04/15 02:29 AM
1

The study was conducted by researchers. Not discovery. It is also being regurgitated by Time Magazine and other reputable sources. We do a lot of testing on animals....in fact...most major understandings come as a result of preliminary testing on animals. That doesn't make this statement not true. It just says it's not 100% proven for humans...although all signs point to it being so based on our understanding of the relationship of mice and men.
/r/TheRedPill05/03/15 06:58 PM
1

Fair point. But being able to express something does increase its chance of being passed on....IF the women find it favorable. So if your dad was successful with mating, he provided some sort of value to a female. His genes are expressed more in his children with the hopes that it will increase their chances of survival and reproduction as well. Not only by helping to facilitate a relationship between father and son...but by also ensuring the child has more of the genes expressed from his father…
/r/TheRedPill05/03/15 06:50 PM
1

Men choosing mates may result in a more attractive society. The most attractive women choosing men involves things that provide her with VALUE. Percentage wise....more women than men have kids.
/r/TheRedPill05/03/15 04:15 PM
0

Phenotypically: observable traits. meaning, more of the DNA that women can actually SEE is being expressed. This allows evolution to head in a specific direction based on the discretion of the women of that time. Not sure how you're not understanding how HUGE the idea that we are more like our fathers is.
/r/TheRedPill05/03/15 04:00 PM
1

Actually, yes, science did indeed say that. Just because EVERY scientist doesn't say it doesn't mean the preliminary research wasn't true. A lot of major publications are now reporting it and I can't wait for more research to be conducted. Time Magazine: "You may look more like your mom or more like your dad, but technically, you inherit equal amounts of genetic information from both; however, a new study has shown that you (and all mammals for that matter) are genetically more like their dads. …
/r/TheRedPill05/03/15 03:41 PM
1

The researchers clearly state the test happened in mice but that they believe it applies for all mammals. We test on mice and other animals all the time in order to get a better understanding of our own body. And if they are PHENOTYPICALLY (meaning, observable traits) more like their dad....that doesn't change anything. Because if the traits are observable, they're observable by WOMEN, and thus subject to being filtered out and or ignored. http://time.com/3729660/science-genetics-mutations-simil…
/r/TheRedPill05/03/15 03:37 PM
2

http://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/health-and-families/health-news/why-youre-almost-certainly-more-like-your-father-than-your-mother-10084995.html Just do a quick Google search. A ton of articles all with headlines clearly stating we are more like our fathers than we are our mothers.
/r/TheRedPill05/03/15 03:22 PM
2

The fact that you took the term mother nature and assumed I literally meant it had emotions just destroyed any credibility your opinion had. I'm obviously aware that mother nature has no emotions.
/r/TheRedPill05/03/15 03:15 PM
0

My conclusions would not even make sense or be possible had the results of their study been reversed.
/r/TheRedPill05/03/15 03:01 PM
-1

Well....Mother Nature clearly believes male genes are worth expressing more.
/r/TheRedPill05/03/15 03:00 PM
-1

One article didn't say it. One team of researchers. Big difference. Should it be studied further? Yes. I'm not a scientist though so I can comment on their research all I want. That's what researchers do. They run tests and make assumptions and run more tests and make assumptions. I also posted the assumptions here to see what people would make of them. Apparently nothing can be discussed unless it's absolutely proven...at which point I'm wondering how you feel comfortable discussing red pill th…
/r/TheRedPill05/03/15 02:58 PM
1

I agree with you on that. But these are recent things plaguing our society. Give or take a 100 years. That doesn't change my statement regarding women and evolution. I said women were great for our gene pool, not ruling society. You're comparing apples to oranges.
/r/TheRedPill05/03/15 05:43 AM
1

Men die with much greater frequency than women. For the most part, because of wars and the dangerous lifestyle of men, there are more women than there are men. And the best men get the most women. Simple. Even if male genes weren't passed on more frequently...even though major publications are reporting that they ARE.... Sexual attraction is playing a significant role in how we are evolving. Even if genes were split 50/50 (and they're not), evolution does not function well without a filtering sy…
/r/TheRedPill05/03/15 05:06 AM
-2

Not the bulk of genetic material...but there is a preference for males. The researchers literally determined we are more like our fathers. I don't know why people keep debating that. If it's only expressed in one generation that could be enough to steer the evolution towards a desired adaptability....especially if the kid keeps reproducing assuming the fathers genes were of benefit (as determined by females AND natural selection) Much faster than chance mutations taking hold over a large enough …
/r/TheRedPill05/03/15 03:59 AM
2

Very interesting. I'll have to look into that further.
/r/TheRedPill05/03/15 02:45 AM
-3

My analysis comes down to this: These scientist have shown that a higher percent of male genes are passed on. Reality shows us that women are hypergamous. Hypergamous activity is common in MANY mammals. You seriously think that women - THE GATEKEEPERS OF REPRODUCTION - aren't influencing evolution? Natural selection weeds out the weak genes and female preference helps ensure that the best suited males reproduce more often. Two systems working in harmony.
/r/TheRedPill05/03/15 02:43 AM
3

The more I think about it, the more it would be defined as "women bashing" because it operates under the assumption that women are hypergamous. Meh.
/r/TheRedPill05/03/15 02:08 AM
0

Okay...well it's definitely not going "up to 60%" for females. It's still only fluctuating beyond 50% for men. How does that change anything? And I don't know if this is a "hasty conclusion", or just me posting an article and giving my analysis. That's why I posted above about wanting a real researcher to explore the idea. I didn't pass it as law. Having an opposing opinion is fine but ending it with a bold "stop drawing hasty conclusions" is unnecessary. Relax
/r/TheRedPill05/03/15 01:35 AM
2

Can you elaborate on this? What do you mean take the features of the previous man? Do you mean a child can have three parents, genetically speaking?
/r/TheRedPill04/03/15 11:32 PM
2

Fair point. Well, regardless, I hope there's some prominent researcher out there who takes the idea mainstream. There is no f#@ing way this hasn't affected evolution. (and could help give us a better understanding as to how we adapted to such rapidly changing environments).
/r/TheRedPill04/03/15 11:07 PM
1

I consider myself to be an intelligent guy but I can't understand what point you were trying to make. And I disagree. I think the researchers who investigated this could truly benefit from exploring this topic further. It isn't "women hating"...it's science. I think 80% of people (red pill aware or not) can agree that women get laid easier. For the scientist who researches this further - he could go down in history as being a key component in the theory of evolution. Right up there with Darwin h…
/r/TheRedPill04/03/15 10:49 PM
2

Wow. Very interesting. That was one of those comments that shakes your core and changes everything you think you know about a particular situation. I never caught on to politicians influencing government contracts based on donations. Back to the drawing board on my political views....
/r/askTRP15/02/15 06:07 AM
1

Interesting - can you expand upon the first idea? I have to admit, I do feel as though corporations ARE intertwined with specific parties. I can't even imagine a political system not being influenced by the people who have the most to protect. Who's funding politics if no one gives a fuck? Not being a dick, just asking for some clarity on your perspective.
/r/askTRP15/02/15 02:41 AM
1

Yeah, honestly, worrying about things beyond our immediate control is really a waste of time. Can I spend hours upon hours trying to influence the political system? Sure. I can spend those same hours doing things with a much higher return on investment. Kudos to you.
/r/askTRP14/02/15 10:30 PM
10

Yeah, I think the most effective form of birth control would somehow involve making male sperm temporarily infertile. We can't just hormonally shut off a woman's reproductive system and not expect that to affect our relationships and sex lives. Can't remember who said it but it makes sense: "It's easier to take the bullets out of a gun than it is to build a bullet proof vest."
/r/TheRedPill14/02/15 10:28 PM
1

I too have a good education nor do I plan on having kids but....umm...well, call me crazy, but I'd still like to see my fellow citizens prosper.
/r/askTRP14/02/15 10:25 PM
2

Yeah, but if you give corporations too much slack they will have no issue driving the rest of the country into poverty while their profits continue to rise. Obviously, if people are so broke that they can't make purchases and this begins to affect a corporations bottom line, they'll toss us a few bones to keep us spending. However, that doesn't sound conducive to a truly happy and functioning society. For example: our economy is "booming" but it's going to a very small percent of people.
/r/askTRP14/02/15 09:16 PM
0

I think pushing the Democrats to the right too much would seriously give up ownership of the country to corporations. Republicans are way too right, and Democrats are way too left. I wish there was a group in the middle, but in all reality, independents rarely stand a chance. With money treated as free speech, it seems there's only two ways to win an election. Pander to corporations, or pander to the people. All people. Every god damn person and sub-interest group.
/r/askTRP14/02/15 09:03 PM
38

Here’s where they fuck up. They blame the birth control pill for disrupting the SMP, claiming that sex is less risky and costly because of it, reducing the value of womens’ vaginas. Birth control may have something to do with this, but feminism and the welfare state are the primary causes. To expand upon this, there's a lot of research that shows birth control is playing a much larger effect on the "sexual marketplace" than many people realize. When women take birth control, we are essentially t…
/r/TheRedPill14/02/15 08:16 PM
0

THIS. Dry skin is nearly invisible on white skin, thus, they don't moisturize as much. Unlike African Americans who take bathes in oils and lotions every night. White women would benefit from an increased skin care routine, but most don't start until well after the wrinkles begin to set in.
/r/TheRedPill13/02/15 10:11 PM
1

Emotion? Sass? It's called writing. Pick up any book off the best seller list and try not to find any of things you call "sass". Moron.
/r/TheRedPill02/02/15 02:06 PM
3

Wow, this response just blew my mind. It was short, sweet, and right to the point. For people who believe in evolution, reading something like that would make red pill concepts much easier for them to understand.
/r/TheRedPill01/02/15 07:19 PM
1

I could write "this has been discussed before" on 90% of the topics in this thread. Nice try.
/r/TheRedPill01/02/15 12:38 AM
2

Are the gay rights movement and feminism going hand in hand right now? Yes. If you read what I mentioned above...you'd understand that this partnership will not last. No. I was not asking for your approval. I asked for opinions...not your stance on gay people. Gay men might cancel out a few lesbians....sure...but that's better than nothing. Although estimates are hard to make.....lets just assume that 5% of men are gay. That's 5% of the population that is immune to pussy power. That is 5% of the…
/r/TheRedPill01/02/15 12:00 AM
1

Gay people have children (through other methods)...and gay people can also adopt. Even beyond that, are you saying that unless someone has children they are useless to society? You're right....although I'm a male, I get a free pass from male discrimination solely because I'm gay. Thanks for pointing that out. NOT. News Flash: Gay people have been around since the dawn of Man...and guess what, humanity still lives!
/r/TheRedPill31/01/15 08:35 PM
4

Nor does yours. Gay people are still men....which means they can still lose their job when the government makes cuts to male dominated industries, and then later uses stimulus's packages that target female occupations. Gay men are also victims of false claims of sexism/rape by women. A gay man struggling in high school will still continue to get less "attention" from his teachers solely because he is male. The only thing that gay men do not commonly experience is getting totally raped in a court…
/r/TheRedPill31/01/15 08:29 PM
1

Yeah, I don't think there's been nearly enough research done on the fact that homosexuality is prominent in social/pack animals (ESPECIALLY female dominated ones) and not lone hunters / insects / etc.
/r/TheRedPill31/01/15 07:07 PM
3

I agree with him completely. Thanks for posting that link, I can't wait to dig around his site and read what else he has to say. I'm glad I am not the only one who caught on to this... Gay men and women are NOT natural allies. This feminist & gay men team has been crafted by the media to push both agendas. I am 100% confident that when gay rights are firmly established within the States, this partnership will begin to dwindle. This is a prime example of "don't bite the hand that feeds you". If t…
/r/TheRedPill31/01/15 05:44 PM
3

Interesting. I totally understand where you're coming from with that perspective, and I do think that a large portion of population responds in a similar manner. However, if all straight men simply shunned us and left us alone, I don't think the gay rights movement would be so important to us. Homophobia is when we are attacked, shouted at, bullied, and attacked by politicians and their legislation. Yes, homophobia like that DOES exist in small towns. In major cities, where homophobia is replace…
/r/TheRedPill31/01/15 05:23 PM
7

The wealthier one definitely gets fucked. But there are definitely ways of marketing a "modern divorce system" that would appeal to both men AND women who sit on the border of feminism and reality. Throw in some feel good "children" and "modern working women" buzz words. Imagine a politician saying something along the lines of: "Everyone knows how important marriages are for a healthy and functioning society...and here in the United States, our marriages are failing. With 50% of marriages ending…
/r/TheRedPill31/01/15 04:40 PM
1

That's a great point. Gay divorces will definitely provide the data for a modern divorce system. As of right now, I'm sure there are two different "styles" of handling it: Straight divorces, in which the female clearly comes out on top....and gay divorces, which obviously must be handled differently. I don't think modernizing heterosexual divorces is possible without proper legislation to prevent a default female 'victory'.
/r/TheRedPill31/01/15 04:18 PM
26

I think you underestimate the masculinity of gay men....but to no fault of your own. The majority of us act normal and fly under the radar, because honestly...who wants to subject themselves to discrimination. But many of the people you THINK are playing on your team may actually be playing on the other. Masculine gays might not be fucking shit up in the court rooms over gay rights (....we tend to let our feminine counterparts handle that battle).....but I promise you, a cute feminist passing AB…
/r/TheRedPill31/01/15 12:23 AM
3

Good point. I do believe I have a general understanding of female behavior despite having only fucked one girl....twice....but alas, there is undoubtedly blind spots in my experiences.
/r/TheRedPill31/01/15 12:15 AM
8

Wasn't really expecting that type of response when I posted this but it's still a great thing to read. Gay men have a lot of pull and "social power" in their circles. If you get on their good side, yeah, that can absolutely translate into getting laid more often. You'll have a lot more in common with us than you realize. When the dust settles on the issue of gay rights, I am very confident in the idea that they'll begin to wage war against the feminist. Right now, in a way, they're using them as…
/r/TheRedPill31/01/15 12:13 AM
8

It's nauseating how often women ask their gay friends for relationship advice. So, although gay men aren't exactly "dating" these females....they are pretty much living the relationship right alongside them. Seriously - if you're a straight guy dating a girl with a gay best friend, consider yourself to be dating him too. I guarantee a large amount of advice she is receiving is coming from him. Not only that, but gay men get to experience a women with no filter. They say anything they want....and…
/r/TheRedPill30/01/15 11:42 PM
14

I think in cities with a large gay population, we don't need to use women as social props. In smaller towns, where homophobia usually runs rampant, gay men usually befriend beautiful & hot women. These hot woman help to "prop" us up and provide us with a social safety net. Homophobic straight guys would think twice about making fun of the feminine gay kid if it meant pissing off his hot best friend. In exchange for hot women providing gay people with social value, we gift them with QUALITY relat…
/r/TheRedPill30/01/15 11:39 PM
23

Game of Thrones is such a great show, hah. But yes, a gay man's ability to resist the lure of pussy has allowed us many of us to become wealthy & politically active. I truly believe gay people will play a pivotal role in resisting the feminist movement, just as lesbians played a key role in getting it started.
/r/TheRedPill30/01/15 11:32 PM
16

You hit the nail on the head. I can't stand female mentalities, but ironically, I find that many of my friends are female. Sigh.
/r/TheRedPill30/01/15 10:25 PM
6

No - but in a time where women have all the same (if not more) economic opportunities as men, women continue to retain all the benefits that come along with being a women. Such as men paying for dates, jumping in front of bullets, being financial providers, etc. During the vast majority of divorces, women retain custodial rights of their children despite numerous research showing that fathers are just as important. Men are expected to pay RIDICULOUS amounts of child support and alimony in order …
/r/TheRedPill30/01/15 10:23 PM
2

Women are doing much, much better than the media is representing. In fact, they are doing better than men are. If you could educate yourself on divorce laws, job statistics, the REAL reasons for the "wage" gap, and things of the like.... it paints a much different picture. If you are truly interested in getting to understand the mindset of many of the guys here, I HIGHLY recommending reading the link below. http://puerarchy.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/TheFuturist_TheMisandryBubble.pdf
/r/TheRedPill30/01/15 09:33 PM
26

Many of my gay friends are firm believers in the Red Pill....but don't actually call it the "red pill". They don't read forums like this but they are more than capable of seeing how women & men interact with each other. It actually disgusts me how often my female friends will talk about not being afraid of divorcing a guy and taking half, not talking to a guy unless he spends money on her, demanding that her rent get paid or else she won't sleep with him, etc. I use to be self conscious about be…
/r/TheRedPill30/01/15 09:24 PM
2

Interesting. I do think that the bottom 20% of men are much more likely to consider hooking up with a gay guy. Perhaps that's a safety net of society also? Rather than the lowest value guys getting so desperate that they decide to start raping women, they instead seek out easier forms of sex... e.g. with gay males. This keeps low value genes from entering the population and gives the bottom feeders a form of release.
/r/TheRedPill30/01/15 09:18 PM
2

Was a rise in gay culture in Ancient Rome a response to a rise in female domination that proceeded the eventual collapse? Quite a bit of controversial research opportunities down that path. I agree 100%. It is well documented that many major societies have collapsed after females rose to power. Ancient Rome, homosexuality, female power, and later the eventual collapse is an incredibly interesting theory.
/r/TheRedPill30/01/15 08:03 PM
5

Although I feel as though I was born gay, my parents went through an extremely nasty divorce when I was younger. I'm willing to entertain the thought that it played a role in me turning gay, though? My dad did eventually get custody of me, however, mostly through a legal loophole. My mom admitted to smoking marijuana (she was 22 at the time). She considered it not a big deal, but the courts did. I'd love to see a much larger study on this idea.
/r/TheRedPill30/01/15 07:59 PM
57

A gay male couple with children getting a divorce? That might establish a legal precedent for the establishment of custody, visitation, child support, and spousal support that uses objective criteria. We all know that objective facts devoid of emotion, pussy preference, and the power of female tears is kryptonite to feminists. Exactly!! You have expressed what I am trying to say perfectly. Gay people have every reason to fight for fair legal battles. Visitation, child support, and other things r…
/r/TheRedPill30/01/15 07:57 PM
2

For every girl that gets offended by "gay advice" or "overstepping personal boundaries", there's about 20 others that don't care. I cannot even explain how frequently women ask me for advice in regard to their relationship and appearance. They trust us. By your logic, there's truth to all rape claims made by women. I'm going to quote myself here to help illustrate how gay people will assist men with divorce laws. I do think that gay men can sympathize with the way divorce courts are handled. Now…
/r/TheRedPill30/01/15 07:34 PM
1

I agree. The feminine gay guys align with the feminist movement for safety and security. By supporting their movement, feminist return the favor with support for gay marriage. When gay's obtain their legal rights, they have no use for women.
/r/TheRedPill30/01/15 07:28 PM
12

I don't think gay men will join the Manosphere in the way you're thinking. I don't think they'll start commenting here on the Red Pill subreddit and other related blogs. I do think that gay men can sympathize with the way divorce courts are handled. Now that gay people are capable of getting married...or should I say, divorced....they are not immune to hypergamous activity either. Two gay men, who are now getting married, are both likely to have a career. They're both likely to support not losin…
/r/TheRedPill30/01/15 07:26 PM
1

That's the thing - these "games" are not immediately obvious and help foster true attachment feelings. If you haven't grasped that concept yet, you won't get much from this subreddit.
/r/altTRP30/01/15 04:46 PM
3

It's hard to say for sure but I could definitely see that being a factor. For me personally - I am very masculine and have very few, if any, feminine mannerisms. I'm attracted to equally masculine men who are submissive behind closed doors. They can't be too feminine AND a bottom because I find that anti-male and if I'm going to entertain that I might as well date a girl. Maybe if your boyfriend dominates you TOO much, it could actually turn him off? It could also just be who he is though. Grant…
/r/altTRP13/12/14 08:57 PM
2

Awesome! I'll take a look!
/r/altTRP12/12/14 11:35 PM
1

Hmm - that's interesting. I'm not sure what the reasoning behind that dream was. I don't think I ever had a sexual dream involving a women.
/r/altTRP12/12/14 08:46 PM
2

Although I'm a firm believer in the idea that people are born homosexual, the study you linked to regarding short men being gay more often is very interesting. I think a guy shorter than 5'5 would have a very hard time wooing women, even if he were a man of means. Girls aren't exactly secretive about height being important: "e.g. what do you call a man shorter than 5'7? a friend." I wonder if this increased difficulty leads them to being more open minded about other "options". Or, on the other h…
/r/altTRP12/12/14 08:27 PM
2

Agreed. I think that getting a gay man's attention is easy. Keeping it, on the other hand, is not. That's where game theory comes in.
/r/altTRP12/12/14 02:19 AM
2

Me personally, I think I was born gay. I do remember having random "crushes" on girls around 1st or 2nd grade...but I can't really tell if that was "authentic" or was she the one experiencing the crush. Either way, around 3rd grade, I do remember thinking of another boy in my class in strangely sexual ways. I didn't think it "sexual" at the time, but it was. I would basically picture them without clothes on. I knew that was wrong somehow and never brought it up. That was the first realization I …
/r/altTRP12/12/14 02:09 AM
2

I agree completely. I feel like reading everything related to the Red Pill helped to confirm situations I already had a basic understanding of. In a sense, it really did kind of make me anti-feminist as well. I never considered that as a side of effect of becoming "aware", but in a way, it did. The red pill certainly changed my life. Prior to utilizing game tactics, I wasn't really a "social success". I've developed an immense self-confidence which helped propel me to top 10% at my university, a…
/r/altTRP12/12/14 01:49 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter