TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

rational_agent Archive

View 1 post and 39 comments by rational_agent on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
6

rational_agent/r/MensRights20/02/11 09:07 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Wow, sad. From that article it seems like more's getting done by changing regulations than by passing an actual law.
/r/MensRights19/05/12 01:57 AM
3

Wasn't there an actual law passed under the Bush administration to help reduce prison rape as well? Did that make any progress?
/r/MensRights18/05/12 10:42 PM
45

Um, what? Feminists already have the right to be armed, do they think the Constitution reads A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the non-feminists to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
/r/MensRights25/03/12 10:46 PM
2

I'm not Canadian, what bias is the National Post?
/r/MensRights24/12/11 04:49 PM
8

William Bennett was also the drug czar under Clinton, this further reinforces my opinion of him as an evil paternalist.
/r/MensRights04/10/11 10:16 PM
7

Alcohol is the #1 date rape drug. (Women who accept drinks from men at bars are apparently not responsible for consumption of said drinks.) Honestly, this is a good point. I remember in high school our health teacher spent wayy too much time discussing roofies, which while a real thing, are really not that common at all.
/r/MensRights19/08/11 01:22 AM
2

Uh, I'd be happy to, I'm not going "AMURIKA FUCK YEAH" here. The First Amendment gives us complete freedom of speech, as opposed to countries with restrictive "hate speech" and libel laws. It gives us complete freedom of religion, as opposed to countries where the government officially recognizes religions, leading to ones like Scientology being treated differently than Christianity. Our Second Amendments rights need no explanation. Our Fourth Amendment rights, though significantly restricted by…
/r/MensRights13/07/11 11:37 PM
30

The sad part is it's freer than most.
/r/MensRights13/07/11 01:20 AM
10

Unfortunately, sarcasm here is serious in the rest of the world.
/r/MensRights08/07/11 07:31 PM
1

Have you ever read anything by Robert Heinlein? He had a very similar idea of gender roles. All societies are based on rules to protect pregnant women and young children. All else is surplusage, excrescence, adornment, luxury, or folly, which can — and must — be dumped in emergency to preserve this prime function. As racial survival is the only universal morality, no other basic is possible. Attempts to formulate a "perfect society" on any foundation other than "Women and children first!" is not…
/r/MensRights07/07/11 03:42 PM
1

I agree with you that it's where we came from, I was just hoping we were past it.
/r/MensRights07/07/11 03:19 PM
2

I'm just saying, can you look at this through something other than this cold, Machiavellian lens? What you're describing is not the world we live in, luckily.
/r/MensRights07/07/11 03:04 PM
3

Because our only purpose in life is to reproduce, right? And that's the only way you judge the worth of a human life.
/r/MensRights07/07/11 02:48 PM
1

I agree with you, I don't have any issue with the numerous men only golf courses either.
/r/MensRights11/06/11 02:32 PM
6

ur a fagit! /s
/r/MensRights10/03/11 12:17 AM
7

not really, though it is irrational that you'd be scared of a bit of metal. Dumb people do more damage with cars than guns :P
/r/MensRights10/03/11 12:16 AM
10

This is one of my least favorite pieces of pop psychology, it's almost as stupid as the idea that people who are prejudiced against gay people are gay themselves.
/r/MensRights09/03/11 08:08 PM
7

because people will buy it, and you can make a lot of money? ;)
/r/MensRights09/03/11 07:17 PM
9

That's disgusting. But remember, this isn't just a men's issue, it's also another harmful effect of the war on drugs that says taking pain medication is bad because it might make you feel good. However, I can see it affecting men more, no one is going to tell a woman to man up and go without her evil drugs.
/r/MensRights10/02/11 09:48 PM
8

I'm glad you can make that conclusion from just one post. But seriously, what did you mean? Since gender roles are different, it's ok for one to hit the other?
/r/MensRights08/02/11 06:31 AM
5

so the role of women is to hit men?
/r/MensRights08/02/11 06:11 AM
4

What are you talking about? You made an assertion that it was cheaper to execute someone, and I told you that studies have been done, and it's a fact, that that's not true. I'm not talking out my arse, and this isn't about what I think.
/r/MensRights28/01/11 10:35 PM
5

I'm not talking about ideas here, I'm talking about actual facts. You can actually look it up, there have been studies done on it. You keep rationalizing, but it's actually not true. And you didn't address what I said... legal costs. It's not just about feeding a prisoner. And as for Why you want to pay to keep murderers alive is fucking insane, please explain that. that, I never gave a personal opinion as to whether I supported the death penalty or not, but I can assure you my opinion is not ba…
/r/MensRights28/01/11 10:21 PM
5

you are aware that there are significant legal costs, right? It's not like the judge smacks his gavel and the defendant is put up against a wall, shot, and buried in a shallow grave.
/r/MensRights28/01/11 09:57 PM
3

You know it's more expensive to execute someone than to imprison them for life, right?
/r/MensRights28/01/11 09:49 PM
1

How do you dress as O'Donnell? Does she have any particularly unique clothing traits?
/r/MensRights07/11/10 05:03 AM
2

funny that forty years ago was supposedly the peak of the "patriarchy" and "male privilege".
/r/MensRights08/10/10 02:34 AM
2

There is always a lighter, if somewhat crude, side to the rape cases though. wtf?
/r/MensRights02/10/10 04:14 AM
5

it's definitely a different way of looking at it.
/r/MensRights26/09/10 10:28 PM
17

That was a really interesting read.
/r/MensRights19/09/10 05:10 PM
2

I would be inclined to agree, but if this woman is not executed, it won't be because people have realized what's wrong with the death penalty, it will be because she's a woman. Still, do I want someone to die for equality? I suppose not.
/r/MensRights14/09/10 02:23 PM
5

indeed. I was just wondering what's better in the short-term.
/r/MensRights14/09/10 02:38 AM
8

I agree...what's better, less people being executed overall, or equality under the law?
/r/MensRights13/09/10 10:41 PM
2

"Some medical experts also determined that Lewis suffered from a dependent-personality disorder, which left her particularly susceptible to manipulation by men."
/r/MensRights13/09/10 10:41 PM
2

uh, that's just you. in my evenings I head downtown to the Patriarchy Club and enjoy my privileged status with other white men. (large cigars and double-breasted suits mandatory)
/r/MensRights07/09/10 10:29 PM
4

I am in favor of this ruling, but it doesn't change my opinion on the club's decision, which I disagree with.
/r/MensRights02/09/10 08:37 PM
5

utter luxury is worth it. I've never heard someone actually admit this. (I'm not disagreeing or agreeing with it, like you said, I've never experienced it)
/r/MensRights19/08/10 02:32 AM
1

It could be a guy speaking his mind through the hole too.
/r/MensRights11/07/10 03:18 PM
2

Interestingly, you can't kill kids in Fallout 3, they just become unconscious.
/r/MensRights19/06/10 02:12 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter