TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

ratione_materiae Archive

View 1 post and 110 comments by ratione_materiae on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
247

Activism/Supportratione_materiae/r/MensRights06/09/22 03:54 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
8

You can just say that people are bad at sex. Took me four partners to find out that actually, getting a blowjob isn’t supposed to hurt
/r/MensRights16/05/25 02:20 PM
5

You do realize that studying gravity is useful even if you know things fall down right
/r/MensRights15/11/23 05:11 AM
3

The type that say this kinda shit tend to lean very progressive, so hit em with the “you mean like Emmett Till?” Or you can always imply that you heard rumors that he had assaulted someone.
/r/MensRights11/11/23 02:09 AM
1

based schizo
/r/MensRights29/09/23 12:50 PM
5

My guy what the fuck do you expect California republicans to do with an 8-32 minority in the state senate and an 18-62 minority in the state assembly.
/r/MensRights29/09/23 08:46 AM
20

This has to be satire there is no way anyone can possibly be this stupid.
/r/MensRights20/09/23 12:46 PM
95

no one told me Yeah I very much doubt that. The question is did you listen
/r/MensRights19/07/23 01:43 AM
1

But what is the implied “other” type of collar
/r/MensRights06/07/23 10:10 PM
28

What?
/r/MensRights06/07/23 02:54 AM
8

I believe people call it “arguing with holes”
/r/MensRights04/07/23 03:45 PM
1

That was a wild fuckin EU comic
/r/MensRights22/06/23 05:43 AM
15

Disrespectful to the gamorrean guards tbh at least they were gainfully employed on the basis of merit
/r/MensRights21/06/23 07:51 AM
6

Your unprompted, preemptive defense of your own dick size was kinda cringe ngl. Anyway just hit em with the “loose pussy energy”. They can’t get mad since they’re doing the same thing
/r/MensRights14/06/23 03:32 PM
6

It is difficult to get [someone] to understand something, when [their ideology] depends on their not understanding it
/r/MensRights14/06/23 03:28 PM
31

for posterity
/r/MensRights12/06/23 03:53 PM
36

What is the possible relevance of this
/r/MensRights12/06/23 12:53 PM
91

For posterity, “sweaty” is a meme that uses deliberate misspelling to mock the kind of obnoxiously condescending people who unironically refer to people as “sweetie” online
/r/MensRights12/06/23 12:10 PM
29

No
/r/MensRights12/06/23 11:45 AM
13

It’s on Instagram and it’s still up
/r/MensRights12/06/23 11:44 AM
262

That’s just the male privilege working its magic sweaty 💅
/r/MensRights12/06/23 10:53 AM
3

you’re quoting someone that wasn’t said in the article and is therefor false What the fuck does this even mean?
/r/MensRights01/01/23 03:29 AM
1

lmao at that point what isnt a women’s issue? Women die in car crashes — are car crashes a women’s issue?
/r/MensRights01/01/23 03:28 AM
14

lmao an actual vagina is immediately differentiable from an artificial one. If you like both then more power to you but to suggest that they’re identical is a blatant lie
/r/MensRights28/10/22 01:41 PM
40

She’ll probably just get a warning, and even if she’s kicked off Airbnb that’s in no way ruining her life.
/r/MensRights15/10/22 02:45 AM
24

OP isn’t attacking the article he’s attacking the person who said that
/r/MensRights10/10/22 02:20 PM
1

She was thirty, I was thirty-five. No sooner were the words out of my mouth than she railed: "Oh, please. You're not going to try to tell me that a man's thirty-five is equal to a woman's thirty-five. It's more akin to a woman's twenty-three." At that point I was, for the one and only time in my dating career as Ned, sorely tempted to strip naked and shout "Look, honey, I'm a chick, too, and a dyke to boot, so drop the Shulamith Firestone routine. I outgrew that when I was twenty-three, and if y…
/r/MensRights27/09/22 11:22 AM
16

lmao you get banned on /r/MensLib for even mentioning it
/r/MensRights25/09/22 11:58 AM
8

Apparently the most common reasons given are hygiene related. Unironically, does your relative live in a desert? I cannot conceive of any circumstance in which voluntary circumcision would result in better hygiene other than in an environment that lacks running water.
/r/MensRights24/09/22 01:46 PM
-1

Is it your view that the eyelid exists purely for pleasure?
/r/MensRights24/09/22 01:41 PM
-1

You're approaching the issue wrongly. Does not tend to be an exceedingly convincing mode of argument; generally, telling someone that they're wrong tends to put them on the defensive and is not conducive to open discourse. It's much more effective to remind them that the eyelid is a flap of skin that keeps some body part moist and that to remove said flap of skin would result in a marked reduction in quality of life
/r/MensRights24/09/22 01:40 PM
5

Are you willing to defend your assertion that "eyelids, which didn’t do much either" are trivial to one's health? That removing an infant's eyelids would have no effect on their future well-being?
/r/MensRights24/09/22 01:31 PM
5

The foreskin and the eyelid have very similar biological roles — to protect a part of the body not meant to be exposed to the elements.
/r/MensRights24/09/22 12:54 PM
6

And also that you decide to talk about eyelids, which didn’t do much either I’m sorry, is your assertion that removing your eyelids would have trivial consequences?
/r/MensRights24/09/22 09:39 AM
9

Other than the obvious, acting as a cover, what else do eyelids do? The glans is meant to be moist and generally not exposed to outside environments. That’s why we have foreskins.
/r/MensRights24/09/22 07:46 AM
1

You may then approve of the Montessori method
/r/MensRights20/09/22 11:03 PM
1

lmao suddenly there're all super into the statistics of crime
/r/MensRights20/09/22 03:14 PM
1

Wild take; knowing that mitochondria is responsible for converting glucose (yeah yeah or CoEn A) into ATP) and knowing that second order functions are useful in optimization is useful – what's that quote about thinking done by cowards and wars being fought by idiots?
/r/MensRights20/09/22 03:10 PM
1

Unironically /r/menslib is an absolute shitole and there's no justifiable reason for downvoting you
/r/MensRights20/09/22 03:06 PM
8

Yes. Debates, especially on the Internet, are for the benefit of the readers and lurkers. It’s especially easy to pick off the easy ones with zingers and clear contradictions in the requisite mental gymnastics.
/r/MensRights19/09/22 04:12 AM
2

It is at present highly unadvisable for a man to have a delicate side. I personally have zero ill-will toward a man who decides to express himself in that manner. However, I would stress very heavily to him that the reality of the situation is that women will not respect him as a man in the current prevailing environment. I make no normative assertions, only the positive – as in "relating to or constituting a motion or device that is definite, unyielding, constant, or certain in its action"– ass…
/r/MensRights12/09/22 03:44 PM
-1

Considering it's largely in part due to the nature of mammalian evolution, women will almost always have the role of selection and men will almost always have the role of putting ourselves out there. It's how mammals have reproduced since time immemorial.
/r/MensRights11/09/22 11:57 PM
3

This is a non-issue for men: a dude wants to wear a skirt, fine. Women are the one who will react poorly to this kind of thing.
/r/MensRights11/09/22 05:20 PM
1

What? Read carefully: the word “voice” is being used here a verb in the sentence “women in Saudi Arabia can voice their opinions freely” — a statement like the one expressed in the post that reflects a normative vision of how things ought to be, not how things actually are
/r/MensRights11/09/22 12:23 PM
1

lmao what are you talking about because of the definition of the word “pretty” Pretty: (adj) pleasant to look at, or (especially of girls or women or things relating to them) attractive or pleasant in a delicate way
/r/MensRights11/09/22 01:12 AM
2

Not only would that result in writing off like 97% of women, it’s unfair to deride them as toxic for a preference ingrained in them through thousands of years of evolution. It’s like calling men toxic for not wanting to date a woman who’s slept with 200 dudes, or who weighs 400 lbs, or has a beard
/r/MensRights11/09/22 01:07 AM
2

The Blackpill ideology claims that physical attractiveness is the primary determining factor in dating and relationship success. Unlike the Bluebill and Redpill ideologies, Blackpill maintains that the effects that physical appearance has on one’s performance and results in the dating world cannot be remedied by improving personality, clothing, hairstyle or hygiene. Any non-physical characteristics, such as personality, will simply be shadowed by one’s physical appearance which include facial pr…
/r/MensRights11/09/22 12:16 AM
1

You didn’t answer my question, really. Because it’s as untrue as saying “women in Saudi Arabia can voice their opinions freely”: true for a small subset but untrue for most.
/r/MensRights11/09/22 12:10 AM
3

No one’s saying you’re morally obliged to. Just that doing so will reduce the pool of women willing to date you. No one’s saying that woman who weighs 400lbs is morally obliged to change herself to please men either.
/r/MensRights10/09/22 01:31 PM
5

Woah… red/black pilled man here. Why would anyone disagree with this? If you have to ask, then you’re blue pilled, or have an extremely generous interpretation of the word “can” wrt to the intended audience. It’s written to tell boys that they can be these things. Anyone who’s spent a modicum of time interacting with women in real life knows that actually showing insecurity or weakness has severe consequences. It might not be the way things should be, but it’s the way things are.
/r/MensRights10/09/22 01:27 PM
23

This is one of those posts where I agree with the sentiment and recognize the situation problem that it’s trying to address as a real problem, but cannot agree with the approach or audience. Any straight man knows that the vast, vast majority of women lose every last iota of attraction she feels toward him if he shows weakness, insecurity, or feminine presentation. I’m not saying that’s how things should be, but it’s the way things are. At present, showing emotion other than anger must be a care…
/r/MensRights10/09/22 12:05 PM
87

I made a post with some of my favorite quotes from Self-Made Man two days ago
/r/MensRights09/09/22 03:01 AM
24

She’s oft-cited but insufficiently appreciated for what she went through (ie being a man for a scant eighteen months — hell if you’re used to being a woman lmao).
/r/MensRights06/09/22 05:06 PM
12

Also, everyone skips the monastery bit. I read it the first time through and found it to be a slog. It may speak to you if you grew up deeply closeted in a conservative christian household but I couldn't relate to much – it was just her fat-shaming some priest for 20 pages lmao
/r/MensRights06/09/22 03:58 PM
2

Caps lock is cruise control for cool Edit: based schizoposting
/r/MensRights03/09/22 10:57 PM
3

lmao to be fair tho you should at least know the title of the book
/r/MensRights03/09/22 09:35 AM
7

She was originally a pro-feminist who took the "plunge" to SHOW OFF HOW EASY BEING MALE WAS and that women had it right to do whatever they wanted to men under the banner of feminism BECAUSE MEN ALL LEAD THE EASY LIFE. She got more than she expected and was hit with the truth. Which makes her ever more the hero. It’s much harder to admit you were wrong. It’s like that saying “it’s only when you are afraid that you can be brave”.
/r/MensRights03/09/22 09:32 AM
25

Believe it or not, women are still oppressed in many countries, no access to education, no access to a career, etc What is the relevance of this? The reigning chess world champion is Norwegian. Are you alleging that women have “no access to education, no access to a career” in Norway? I have met many women who are into that, just not into the community of people who are "really just a giant boy's club"(quote from my friend who is into all that stuff) Anecdotal evidence and deceptively vague (wha…
/r/MensRights19/07/22 06:37 AM
123

Yeah that came outta nowhere and ruined the otherwise very good post for me
/r/MensRights19/07/22 06:19 AM
19

Women were oppressed for a lot of human history, which would explain that. I doubt it. Even now the ratio of women to men in the upper echelons of chess and go is staggering. The variability theory makes much more sense — more geniuses but also more complete idiots. There must be some difference in the ways in which male and female intelligence are expressed, based on brain structure due to exposure to hormones in the womb. Some underlying element has to explain why many hobbies predicated on th…
/r/MensRights19/07/22 06:18 AM
6

A strawman is when you built a false version of your opponent’s argument (the eponymous straw man) and then argue against said version. Calling someone and incel is just a personal insult, not a strawman
/r/MensRights17/07/22 01:57 PM
15

I don’t think breast size is viscerally insulting enough — there are plenty of fans of breasts of all sizes. I’d suggest “loose pussy energy” or “beef curtain energy”. If you’re insistent on breasts I’d go more with “lopsided chest energy”
/r/MensRights13/07/22 03:18 AM
1

Are the 5% of oil workers who are female just super buff then? What? Not necessarily, in the same way that a male kindergarten teacher need not be weak. There are massive barriers to women gaining as much muscle mass as men but risk aversion can be trained. What is the value in training biologically ingrained risk-aversion out of women? It’s a product of millennia of evolution, and you’re gonna have about as much luck “training” women to — say — approach men first. It’s contrary to mammalian bio…
/r/MensRights06/07/22 08:17 PM
1

Just did a quick google and saw 5% of oil rig workers are female so obviously women are capable of the work. They are precisely the exception that proves the rule, though if you’re gonna be pedantic I’ll amend my earlier statement to “women in principle”. No occupation is 100% either sex, obviously. Now if our culture starts segregating and selecting for exclusively men to do all the risky jobs, claiming that women should stay in the home or not even try such jobs Hey man take your complaint up …
/r/MensRights06/07/22 02:41 PM
3

Boys preferred boy-related toys more than girls did, and girls preferred girl-related toys more than boys did. These differences were large (d ≥ 1.60). From Davis, Jac TM and Hines, Melissa. “How Large Are Gender Differences in Toy Preferences? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Toy Preference Research” Archives of Sexual Behavior 49 (2020): 372-394 Sex differences in toy preferences in children are marked…Male monkeys, like boys, showed consistent and strong preferences for wheeled toys, …
/r/MensRights06/07/22 02:27 PM
8

Ok, finally we have an irrefutable answer. But they offset it with ovaries. Cancelled for transphobia in 3..2..1…
/r/MensRights06/07/22 08:22 AM
4

Because women aren’t willing to work on oil rigs and men are willing to take the risk. Comes down to fundamental biological differences
/r/MensRights06/07/22 08:18 AM
1

Also, Gorsuch is 54 and Kavanaugh is 57 — on the older side yes but not old. I don’t think either of them have any grandkids. Alito and Roberts are old white men, but then Breyer is an older white man.
/r/MensRights28/06/22 06:34 AM
3

Very well sir; carry on.
/r/MensRights26/06/22 11:46 AM
17

Brock Turner? Which Brock Turner? Are you referring to convicted rapist Brock Turner, convicted on three counts of felony sexual assault by the Superior Court of the State of California for and in the County of Santa Clara? I don't understand what the relevance of convicted rapist Brock Turner's criminally short sentence is to the substantive matter at hand. Either way, people legally have access to life-saving procedures. The State would have to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the doctor k…
/r/MensRights26/06/22 11:19 AM
10

Take responsibility for your actions and don't stick [take dick from someone with whom you wouldn’t want a child]. You would of course agree with this statement, correct? I merely took what you said and swapped the sexes.
/r/MensRights26/06/22 10:59 AM
23

If you're going to [be impregnated] a [man], you take responsibility for that. Would you agree with this statement? I only swapped the sexes
/r/MensRights26/06/22 10:58 AM
16

Everyone should have access to life saving procedures regardless of sex. What the fuck are you talking about? Even the strictest states have exceptions for when the mother’s life is in danger
/r/MensRights26/06/22 10:53 AM
6

What’s the option for an etopic pregnancy? A dead fetus? An incomplete miscarriage? What are the option for women in those situations? Abortion. All states that have abortion restrictions also have exceptions, like in cases where the mother’s life is in danger. If you believe otherwise you have been lied to
/r/MensRights26/06/22 07:15 AM
40

What do you mean "bad at communicating"? When it comes to this kind of thing, women have no interest in being polite He means that society hasn’t “”progressed”” to the point that a woman can only call a man ugly and people to immediately agree with her. However, calling that same man creepy accomplishes and conveys the same while shielding her from criticism and in many cases making her the victim
/r/MensRights18/06/22 04:17 AM
54

You under estimate the desperation of simps
/r/MensRights14/06/22 05:46 AM
6

Not sure what your metric is, but women in that age range are a third again as likely to have a child with autism, for example
/r/MensRights14/06/22 05:46 AM
1

It’s a proper ancient copypasta that goes hi every1 im new!!!!!!! holds up spork my name is katy but u can call me t3h PeNgU1N oF d00m!!!!!!!! lol…as u can see im very random!!!! thats why i came here, 2 meet random ppl like me _… im 13 years old (im mature 4 my age tho!!) i like 2 watch invader zim w/ my girlfreind (im bi if u dont like it deal w/it) its our favorite tv show!!! bcuz its SOOOO random!!!! shes random 2 of course but i want 2 meet more random ppl =) like they say the more the merr…
/r/MensRights12/06/22 02:01 AM
2

lmao didn’t see his username and thought you were making a weird Penguin of Doom reference
/r/MensRights11/06/22 05:38 AM
1

If you get mad at what is said here because you think women are beyond reproach Bruh ain’t no body suggesting that
/r/MensRights07/06/22 04:24 PM
1

That is an incredibly hot take
/r/MensRights12/02/22 06:20 AM
1

As an aside Erin Pizzey is quite based. I’ll concede on the IGM (or really, infant mutilation of any kind I suppose). There are some locales where girls are barred from compulsory education, I’m sure most people generally find this to be disagreeable
/r/MensRights12/02/22 02:03 AM
0

There is not a culture on earth that practices female genital mutilation that does not also practice male genital mutilation, thus FGM isn't a sign of misogyny in any cultures. Sure, so they can focus on FGM and we can do so MGM and that’s a shared goal, is it not?
/r/MensRights11/02/22 03:33 PM
-3

I’m sure we agree that tying the voting age to the draft age and then not expanding the draft was fucked up but we’re talking like the right to compulsory education and female genital mutilation (which ofc is just as bad as the male equivalent).
/r/MensRights11/02/22 10:24 AM
4

lmao gotem
/r/MensRights11/02/22 04:57 AM
35

I’ve written off Menslib ever since they banned for me pushing back on if women’s issues belong in a sub for mens issues
/r/MensRights11/02/22 04:19 AM
10

Men's rights and feminism are pretty much incompatible. Eh, I think you can have both working together toward egalitarianism in some cases. I’d suggest that most of us have at least some sympathy for feminists in regions where women are actually oppressed like Saudi Arabia
/r/MensRights11/02/22 04:07 AM
1

I came across a supposedly counter argument to this which goes along the lines of "if you're given 3 cakes, but 1 cake is poisonous, you wouldn't eat any". I would suggest that it's unwise to contest the statistical veracity of this analogy because that's missing the forest for the trees. The fact of the matter is that men are more dangerous than women. I'm an able-bodied man, but if I were walking home at night I would much rather walk past a group of women than a group of men. That's just simp…
/r/MensRights25/01/22 03:16 PM
12

and that the same part isn't found in other media reporting on this However The algorithm was aggressively detecting comments denigrating White people more than attacks on every other group, according to several of the documents. One April 2020 document said roughly 90 percent of “hate speech” subject to content takedowns were statements of contempt, inferiority and disgust directed at White people and men, though the time frame is unclear. Source: Dwoskin, Elizabeth et al. “Facebook’s race-blin…
/r/MensRights13/01/22 02:51 AM
6

Okay, you’re getting very hostile bruh I said Oh great then we're agreement Also, someone who’s cursing and being hostile. What are you talking about??
/r/MensRights22/12/21 04:27 AM
5

My guy "incel" is a portmeateau of two words that have very obvious definitions. I didn’t say you justified misogyny. I explained that incels and misogynists are different. Oh great then we're agreement that it's inaccurate to define incel as necessitating misogyny
/r/MensRights22/12/21 04:07 AM
4

I asked what an incel is if it isn’t someone who hates the opposite gender and believes a very misogynistic view on women, and you still have yet to tell me what term you’d rather me use. The term for someone who hates a specific gender is "misogynist" or "misandrist". Simple as. My problem was you didn’t think an incel is someone who is bitter and possibly harms someone because of rejection of sex or relationships. Bro I'm just telling you the fucking definition of a word. Incel just means invo…
/r/MensRights22/12/21 04:00 AM
5

Bro it sounds like you have your own thing going on there. I never said anything to justify any of the shit you're proselytizing against I just said that not all misogynists are incels and not all incels are misogynists so it doesn't make sense to define one as the other
/r/MensRights22/12/21 03:49 AM
9

You are not born as an incel. You begin to identify as one. Bro the "in" in "incel" is short for "involuntary". By definition it covers anyone – including heterosexual women – who is not having sex and did not choose that state of affairs on their own volition. Let me rephrase then: incel is a factual term no different to "red-haired", "wearing shoes", or "lives in this zipcode"
/r/MensRights22/12/21 03:26 AM
10

Many people who hate women and believe rights or pain should be taken / inflicted, identify as an incel. That's of questionable veracity, and even if it were true, overlap of two distinct groups does not permit assimilation of one into the other. "Most" Americans are white, but not all Americans are white and not all Whites are American. It doesn't make sense to use the terms interchangeably nor to define "white" as "an American". Incel is a factual term like "red-haired" or "tall" or "has hands…
/r/MensRights22/12/21 03:15 AM
9

The problem is the use of the term "true incel" as though you have the authoritative take on what constitutes an individual who exemplifies such. who genuinely believe hating women and taking away rights from them is an okay thing to do What you're describing is just a standard misogynist in the actual sense of the term. Someone being an incel doesn't necessitate misogyny, as shown by the fact that the original self-termed incel was a woman who complained about not having a boyfriend. Not all mi…
/r/MensRights22/12/21 03:01 AM
6

This characterization of "a true incel" is fucking bonkers because the term incel was coined by a woman who was complaining about not having a boyfriend
/r/MensRights22/12/21 02:41 AM
11

A true incel is someone who hates women because they did not experience a sexual connection, or just because a woman refused to have sex with them lmao imagine speaking with such a faux-authoritative tone and not knowing that the term "incel" was coined by a woman. Incel is just a abbreviation of "involuntarily celibate" and applies to anyone who's not having sex, and who had no choice in this matter
/r/MensRights22/12/21 02:37 AM
5

discussion is usually very limited there they call themselves menslib discussion is usually very limited there
/r/MensRights22/12/21 02:34 AM
9

feminism's twisted and hateful beliefs Why'd you say the same thing three times (zing!)
/r/MensRights22/12/21 02:31 AM
4

You can edit the body of a text post. Just replace "www" with "np"
/r/MensRights22/12/21 02:31 AM
2

this is not right and shows you how easily the "abuse victim" becomes abusive themselves. Eh, it's their community and they're allowed to set whatever rules they want (I've been banned too), and people are allowed to vote with their feet. You might notice that this sub has nearly twice as many members.
/r/MensRights22/12/21 02:30 AM
8

lmao dude that's even more skeptical than the standard "trust but verify". I don't blame you one bit though
/r/MensRights22/12/21 02:28 AM
12

Bro MensLib is absolutely a cesspool. I got banned for suggesting that trans rights (as in very broadly trans rights) isn't a men's rights issue even though the other guy literally said as well as a women's issue, and really everyone's issue; what I'm primarily arguing is that it's not not a men's issue
/r/MensRights22/12/21 02:24 AM
53

I mean, this is usually the case with most such issues — women are generally just as if not more pro-choice than men, in countries where female genital mutilation is practiced it’s generally mothers doing it to their daughters, et cetera. But the appropriate response is a “so what?” You may have put them on the defensive by accusing them that they themselves are responsible for these issues in the same way that we often are taken aback when it appears that we are being accused of culpability whe…
/r/MensRights13/12/21 09:57 AM
-5

But yeah honestly fuck being pro-draft. The draft was used out of necessity during the Civil War and WWII. The vast majority of Americans would considered these to have been necessary and righteous conflicts (the Confederacy used conscription too). Would you have preferred that the US not drafted anyone and lost those wars? The draft a necessary evil. That said, I’m also pro-exclusively-male-conscription because it’s clownworld to suggest that men and women are equally good at all tasks.
/r/MensRights04/11/21 08:54 AM
10

Bruh that’s definitely not universal. Otherwise I agree — legal and consenting, no issue.
/r/MensRights30/10/21 09:56 AM
15

lmao brain-dead take considering that there are men get married in their 60s — to women around their age — for companionship. And I reckon they have more experience than you do
/r/MensRights30/10/21 09:55 AM
9

What’s next, suing a marathon for selecting a winner based on running speed?
/r/MensRights19/10/21 10:36 PM
1

I’m strongly asserting that had your argument been applied in 1863, the confederacy may have won, and that had your argument been applied in 1941, the nazis would have won. Nothing substantive has changed since then. We probably agree though that the draft should never have been applied for Vietnam and thank god it wasn’t for the War on Terror
/r/PussyPassDenied23/07/21 10:12 AM
0

we STOP requiring anyone to sign up. You are aware that Nazi Germany was defeated through the use of a draft, right?
/r/PussyPassDenied23/07/21 05:25 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter