TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

read-only-username Archive

View 0 posts and 42 comments by read-only-username on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

Oh my.
/r/TheRedPill02/10/16 07:44 PM
1

Pleased to meet you I am woman. Yes I was indeed being sarcastic; presenting two clauses that could not possibly co-exist. Maybe read the whole post next time before jumping down my throat?
/r/TheRedPill02/10/16 07:42 PM
0

Women hate sex and need to be manipulated into engaging in sex with redpill knowledge...while simultaneously being massive sluts who will sleep with random dudes given the chance, just cause they feel like it.
/r/TheRedPill02/10/16 04:05 PM
2

Cause literally all women can do is be fucked, right? You're hella messed up.
/r/TheRedPill02/10/16 04:00 PM
1

Foolish man. You want so much to be superior to women, but you're superior to no one......
/r/TheRedPill02/10/16 07:00 AM
1

Google returns search results based on your browsing/search history, so it makes sense that a RPer would get a RP blog as a result. I didn't get an RP blog results.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/16 02:18 PM
0

Lol, great debate skills fam
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/16 01:10 PM
0

I read that entire article, but it doesn't give any examples of feminist groups actually opposing these laws? Just says that they "usually" do, without anything to back it up. So we have two chapter of a US single organization opposing shared parenting laws...how is this relevant to my experience as feminist in the UK?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/16 03:31 PM
-1

This chapter and I think one in New York? So two chapters, of a single feminist organization. Yeeees, they definitely represent feminists worldwide.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/16 09:48 PM
2

So you agree that they're not fertility cues then?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/16 08:08 PM
1

PPD is a debate sub, not your personal venting sub. If you can't debatem then people are going to call you out.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/16 08:08 PM
1

hahaha ok buddy.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/16 08:07 PM
-1

She answered you; the bulk of feminists don't fight against shared custody, so your point is entirely moot. And don't mention those bloody Florida women again. A group of women from Florida are not, in any shape or form, "the bulk of feminists."
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/16 08:00 PM
3

Again, if you want serious debate than a good starting point would be a good post with serious evidence, instead of the dumb "lol women are goldiggers AMIRITE" tripe you're giving us here.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/16 03:52 PM
5

It's like, how am I seriously meant to argue against an unsubstantiated point which is intentionally meant to be inflammatory and annoying? Your post is the debating equivalent of farting in the wind. The only thing I can do is acknowledge the ridiculousness of what you're saying.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/16 03:40 PM
6

being sexually desirable For women that usually means 'wealthy.' No it doesn't.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/16 01:48 PM
0

Which ones?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/16 01:32 PM
5

Dark coloured-lips and prominent eyebrows aren't fertility cues, yet that's the make-up look which is currently in fashion. So obviously, giving off signs of fertility isn't the sole reason that women wear make-up.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/16 12:46 PM
1

It's like talking to a brick wall, honestly.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/16 12:43 PM
1

Well if you can't back it up then why bring it up?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/16 01:02 AM
2

Wait, how are the matriarchy (lol) engineering studies? That's a pretty big claim to just throw out there with absolutely nothing to back it up.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/16 12:54 AM
1

And your point is?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/16 12:48 AM
7

That would be a great reply if I was a freaking bird.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/16 12:47 AM
1

Here's my objection: What you said is false but, since you intentionally used vague language, it's impossible for anyone to refute your claim. You're a bad debater.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/16 12:47 AM
2

You don't even know shogunofsarcasm, how can you possibly say that there is a disconnect between what she says and what she does?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/16 05:32 PM
8

Oh honey all men are attracted to the fertility cues. It's why you wear makeup. To mimic fertility cues. So having purple lips and full eyebrows is an indication of fertility now?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/16 05:28 PM
1

Look, we're in a debate sub. If you want to use vague language with the intent of weasling out of actually providing any sources for you claims, then you're not very good at debating.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/16 03:11 PM
1

If the state pays, it would cost more. Nah, a lump sum (paid back to the man immediately) will early always end up being cheaper than years of payments (paid to the mother and child in form of welfare parents/to support the child in the care system.) Hence the door could be shut before said horse could bold. That's assuming that human beings are 100% rational 100% of the time. We're not though If the kid has no family, saddling a man who was conned into the situation is not a better solution. Th…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/16 06:45 PM
1

Dude, you're the one who made the original statement. Not me.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/16 06:41 PM
1

Saying there's a "good chance" of something happens means that there is a high probability of said thing happening.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/16 04:38 PM
1

Where is a man supposed to get child support money from? What happens if he can't pay? Wage garnishment? Prison? What? These things already happen to men. Equality sucks, doesn't it? Doesn't happen in my country. I don't think your system is good for men, doesn't mean that I think the solution to the problem is to heap the same burdens on the mother. Either way it's the child that pays. Here's a tip though: she can get a job and maybe not get pregnant by someone else while in a relationship with…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/16 04:31 PM
1

It's not? I'm saying that they're the same thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/16 04:26 PM
1

It costs between £814.60 and £879.60 to get it done properly in the UK (i.e. to get a test that will hold up in court.)
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/16 08:32 AM
1

I mean, people generally don't stick their child support payments in a bank. They spend it. If after, I dunno, 5 years of child support, a woman was asked to pay it all back...probably about £25000...where the hell would she get that money from? What would happen if she couldn't pay? Wage garnishment, prison, what? It won't cost the state relatively little. The woman will have to get the money to support her child from somewhere and, statistically, a single income isn't going to cut it. So the s…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/16 08:15 AM
2

I mean, you're the one who said "good chance" but ok...? And "good chance" obviously implies a sizeable possibility of it happening, don't be obtuse. If you miswrote, tha=en say, don't hide behind weasel words.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/16 07:46 AM
5

Saying there's a "good chance" a child will be raped if left alone with "any unrelated male" is just completely false and you have a really warped view of humankind if you think it's true.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/16 11:04 PM
4

Hey Jessica, there's no country on earth, now or in history, where a child could be left with unrelated men without there being a good chance the child would be raped. Wtf no? How little must you think of men to believe this.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/16 10:51 PM
3

Most of the people I know who are serious drug addicts (I know far too many...deprived town) were introduced to them at a very young age, usually by someone older who they trusted.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/16 10:50 PM
12

These are two separate crimes: the neglect, and the rape. If the men hadn't raped the daughter, the mother would still be 100% responsible for the neglect of her daughter. However, she is not responsible for the rape...because she didn't rape her daughter, nor did she have any prior knowledge that the crime was going to happen. If the woman had pimped her daughter out, then that's a whole other kettle of fish.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/16 10:46 PM
1

Haha, that's cool. Should work on my reading comprehension.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/16 10:17 PM
3

It seems to be quite a British term, but I guess the easiest way to sum it up is someone who, long-term, lives paycheque to paycheque, and/or was raised in a household where the family subsisted this way. That's the simplest way to think about it, but of course, here in Britain we are so obsessed with our entrenched class-system that your class status can also be dictated a myriad of other factors; the clothes you wear, the hobbies you enjoy, your level of education, what kind of school you went…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/16 10:44 AM
1

Are men more likely to own guns though? I mean sure, a woman could go and buy a gun, but it's surely easier to obtain pills or a razor than a gun? Whereas a man from the United States would be more likely to own guns already, and know how they work.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/15 07:58 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter