TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

realityczek Archive

View 0 posts and 62 comments by realityczek on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Almost no males believe it is common, but that is partially the point. Being attractive to a substantially younger female generally speaking makes you an exception, and that signals (but is not itself a component of) status/success. Attraction is multivariant, of course, but some broad conclusions can be drawn. A 22 year old female who is attractive has a wide range of partners to choose from, if she chooses a substantially older male (outside of coercion) then that naturally indicates he has so…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/25 03:52 PM
1

"understand why many are embracing things like 4B" Hey. 4B is fantastic. It just proves that it is possible to exercise self-control over one's sexual conduct. "Wow your dedication to being wrong is apparent here." Given that I am correct about the law, and you are not? I am not the one with a issue on this front.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/24 04:20 AM
1

Except those procedures are clear not, and they law is specifically crafted such that they are not. You have a few incidents of bad doctors making bad decisions, which happens all the time. The only reason they are getting any traction now is because it is politically expedient to pretend this was an abortion law issue and not a competency issue.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/24 02:53 AM
1

TLDR; there is no such law, in any of the 50 states, and you're just upset that your emotions are not the same thing as facts.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/24 06:53 AM
1

Feel free to cite the law that makes it illegal. You keep screaming about your grounding in reality - but it's just not so.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/24 04:52 PM
1

You don't have any facts on your side. The fact is, the law does not criminalize what you claimed was criminal. The fact is, there was no treatment as a result of legitimate fear of legal prosecution. You may speculate on the causes of a medical event, but without the ability to directly link it to the laws or policies you oppose, it remains just that—a theory, not fact.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/24 07:22 AM
1

"Speciesism is the same as racism." Yup, utterly predictable and completely devoid of any logic or rationale. Classic vegan.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/24 12:08 AM
1

You might be right... but we are at an inflection point, and it would have been true in the inverse if Kamala had won convincingly. There is a lot that is going to happen, or could happen, in the next four years that will have a long-standing impact on the nation.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/24 07:11 PM
1

LOL... If I eat meat, I cannot be interested in not murdering a child. Yeah, that makes sense.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/24 07:08 PM
2

Fair, it happens. Thanks for the discussion!
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/24 07:02 PM
1

Social movements take time... our whole history shows this. Then, there is a transformational moment. This might prove not to be it, or it might be the start. I will say this, winning the popular vote is HUGE in that regard. It shows the right they are not a beleaguered, backward minority voice. The majority need not remain silent.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/24 03:52 PM
1

Good question. But the problem isn't a legitimate fear of the law.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/24 08:47 AM
1

None of those women died because a doctor was in legitimate danger of violating the law.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/24 08:46 AM
1

Whelp, that's the market for you :)
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/24 08:45 AM
1

Yup, that's about the most ridiculous point possible, but I'm sure you think it's clever.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/24 08:44 AM
2

Do we have any evidence that the exceptions are not being allowed? Has anyone been prosecuted? Has anyone lost their licence? Has anyone lost a job?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/24 04:08 AM
6

I'm sorry, but why is being a vegan or not being vegan supposed to be relevant here? You seem obsessed with it.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/24 03:05 AM
3

LOL, seriously, do those sorts of insults upset people? I mean, the sort of person who doesn't need a hug tent or safe space... you know, adults. It's funny how when the entire nation pretty much coalesced around the 1st-trimester compromise, things were pretty stable until the left went nuts and demanded abortion-on-demand up until the moment of birth. But hey, that compromise would almost certainly win majority support in the vast majority of states. Feel free to support it.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/24 03:03 AM
5

"Not a state in the USA considers terminating an ectopic pregnancy an abortion" Oh, look, you want to be pointlessly obtuse because you know your claim holds absolutely no water. Cite a law in any state in the US that criminalizes naturally occurring miscarriages or treatment for ectopic pregnancy. Should be simple. You claim they exist.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/24 03:00 AM
3

Cite the law that does what you claim it does.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/24 02:58 AM
3

Plausible deniability as in "I recognize that no such law exists, that my point is fabricated... but I need to use some vague smear tactic to pretend it's still real?"
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/24 11:27 PM
3

Feel free to seethe more; it's been working so well for the left recently.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/24 11:26 PM
1

I know... but it's still fun :) A few hundred years from now, some data archeologist AI will be going through these threads, and there will be at least some sign there were rational people here.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/24 11:22 PM
2

LOL, your efforts to bother me are both amusing and futile. It's just the pointless, ill-informed noise of someone who believes they possess the information and capability to harm others with their words... and you simply do not.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/24 11:20 PM
4

Yes, yes they did. Not a state in the USA considers terminating an ectopic pregnancy an abortion.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/24 11:18 PM
1

Hey, there are idiotic doctors everywhere. The reality is that there is not one nation in the USA that prevents doctors from terminating a pregnancy that threatens the life of the mother.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/24 11:17 PM
1

Hey, I am not the one who thought "I bet they'd sleep with me if I went and offered it to them" as if it was some sort of cogent argument.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/24 11:15 PM
-5

Take away their mothers' rights? Which ones? Aside from the "right" tokill a child on demand, there are no female rights at risk from Trump. Many of us support a woman’s right to safety—from men entering their private spaces under the guise of identity, from those pushing them into irreversible surgeries during adolescent confusion, and from the unchecked import of criminals and gangs. We support a woman's right to own and carry a firearm, access uncensored information, and make informed choices…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/24 06:56 PM
–

LOL... look at my history; if you think I am somehow hiding that my values align with MAGA, you are utterly confused. I am explaining why the DNC lost normally left-leaning people. If you want to hide from that reality? That's on you.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/24 06:48 PM
1

Not a single thing you said addresses my point or its logic.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/24 06:47 PM
-3

LOL, hey, he might take you up on that offer. Many people accept free samples at the grocery store, especially for items they would never buy otherwise. It's amusing you think this is some sort of flex :)
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/24 06:46 PM
–

Over the past four years, countless men sat through company “training” and “awareness” sessions that were little more than 1984-style two-minute hates targeting white men. They endured meeting after meeting where it was openly celebrated that fewer white men were being hired. They watched as every other group was applauded for having “pride,” while they were expected to sit quietly in shame. And they finally said no more.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/24 06:21 PM
1

Oh please. If the DOJ had a single iota of evidence against Trump in the Epstein thing? They would have "leaked it" and crushed his candidacy. Trump is the most investigated, surveilled, and tapped politician in US history... if he was a child-fucker? The DOJ would know, and we sure as hell would have evidence.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/24 06:14 PM
–

Especially when that accusation pops up at JUST the right time the DNC needed it too.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/24 06:13 PM
–

It's not "anti-transgender" to think that cutting the genitals off a confused 11 year old is a ridiculous idea. It's not "anti-transgender" to think that letting someone wake up one morning, put on a dress, and go spend the next few months is female sports dressing room is ridiculous. It's not "anti-transgender" to recognize that it is insane to claim that putting a gender on a birth certificate is somehow "anti-science" because you have no idea what gender they are yet. It's not "anti-transgend…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/24 06:11 PM
–

The DNC started losing people the moment it unironically embraced the notion that a lesbian who isn’t attracted to someone with male anatomy isn’t a “real lesbian.” This idea is so out of touch that it signaled, issue after issue, how disconnected the “party of science” had become from the real-world logic of everyday people. Instead, they elevated partisan “experts” in soft fields as unassailable beacons of truth, disregarding any practical sense. They began hemorrhaging regular supporters, cho…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/24 05:15 PM
7

Feel free to cite the law in question.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/24 03:46 PM
1

It’s going to work out just fine for men. The attractive women boycotting men will just open an OnlyFans, and for $2.99 a month, anyone can get their dopamine hit without the hassle of dealing with their drama—win-win. Meanwhile, the women who aren’t caught up in this madness, who actually want a partner and a family, and who don’t make every decision based on the freedom to kill a child? They’ll be out there building real lives and finding real partners.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/24 03:09 PM
1

No, it's not a real thing. The real crisis for men is that they mistakenly believe women who tell them the way to have a good life is to become ever more feminine, ever more weak, and ever more self-hating. Meanwhile, in DROVES women reject that same emasculated husk the moment they come across someone who is unabashedly masculine. As men realize this, they are starting to care less and less about the approval of women. It's a slow process, but men realize they want to be a lot more like their w…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/24 03:05 PM
10

"Western women are going to start acting like that en mass. Hope you're all ready." I guess we'll just be left with the women who see men as partners, choose to sleep with men they care for, and are open to starting a family. If that mean no more raw-dogging someone you saw on Tinder who is already in a triple-digit body-count? That's a fair trade.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/24 03:00 PM
1

Not that it matters—identity politics is already allowing record numbers of men into so-called “lesbian” spaces anyway.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/24 02:57 PM
6

There is no place in the US where it is illegal for a doctor to terminate an ectopic pregnancy or a miscarriage.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/24 02:54 PM
2

It’s the classic leftist blind spot in action: a shallow “I can bribe them” approach to complex issues. Telling men they might lose the chance to casually sleep with women who hold them in such low regard they'd rather end a pregnancy than carry their child? Hardly the threat they think it is.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/24 02:52 PM
41

Chances are, these women were never really on the radar for conservative men anyway. Men aren’t interested in partners who view them as the problem and subscribe to the extremes of identity politics—those are the only ones likely to go this route. Plenty of women hold values that align with MAGA—and as a bonus, many of them are smoking hot. So, no worries.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/24 02:50 PM
1

Nothing. I am a reasonable person and act in reasonable ways. I have no particular desire to spend even a moment of my time placating someone who has allowed the world to make them crazy. If that means they are too "scared"? Sounds like I am better off without them.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/23 06:41 AM
–

Wow, "healthy" is a much more kind term than some of the others I've been called :) Seriously, this sort of emotional self-sufficiency has its benefits, but some women will find it to be a little cold if they are seeking an all-consuming "I can't live without you" passion. My relationships tend to be with partners who are also fairly self-contained. It means we WANT to be with each other but without the overwhelming NEED to be with each other. Mind you, it only SEEMS distant or cold. The degree …
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/23 03:29 PM
27

Would I be upset if my GF started showing enhanced self-discipline and as a result got significantly hotter? LOL, no. I really wouldn't. Is it possible that will bring enhanced male attention, and thus more "competition" challenging my relationship? Sure. Does that bother me? Not even a little. If the worst happens? I'll survive losing her. What would destroy me inside would be wanting my girl to be deliberately less attractive than she could be so that I can "keep" her. FOR ME, that would viola…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/23 06:36 PM
5

Yeah, I have always found that whole attempt to shame men about this to be kind of a cope without data. "Any man that finds someone closer to their physical peak, with a generally more option filled future is just a dude who can't handle a 'mature woman' and just wants a naive fool."
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/23 05:26 PM
4

At some point, you have to recognize that the person you are dealing with is too far off the normal curve for normal pressures to be practical. The tools that we can use (ethically) have a limit in the amount of aberration they can correct. Sure, you almost always CAN bring someone under control with the proper application of the right techniques... but do you really want to have to constantly devote that much time and energy? I mean, who is in the driver's seat if every action you take for the …
/r/MarriedRedPill28/02/22 07:41 PM
1

Secondly, KEEP YOUR MOUTH SHUT. They will gab. All day. About Everything. If it isn't work related don't talk about it. They will talk shit about someone else, and as soon as you open your mouth about it, even if you agree with them, they will tell said person (and everyone else) and it will backfire on you. Don't trust a single one of them because they don't give a shit about you. This. Do. Not. Trust. Notice how they act with each other? The way they smile to a face then stab in the back? You …
/r/askTRP21/05/15 12:06 PM
13

What is it they truly value? In short form? Having a clear set of ethics and priorities Acting always in a way that is congruent with that Not requiring outside validation, justification or motivation for either of the previous From those, all else flows. For many women even if they disagree with the ethics / priorities the result will still be attractive. It is the self contained congruity of action and purpose that is inherently desirable. This is one of the reasons why serial killers and othe…
/r/TheRedPill27/12/14 12:11 PM
5

Yeah, even if he is a comedian, that doesn't excuse inviting an outright bigot and giving her a podium. It's like you have never seen his show. Or did you really think that all these years him or Jon Stewart were giving you anything but an echo chamber?
/r/MensRights01/11/14 12:42 PM
4

It invalidates both men and women and perpetuates a very stilted, sad view of people and how they connect. How scared and unsure you must be if you feel that anything we say, write, believe or do in our own relationship has the power to invalidate your relationships. Maybe for you it is that your relationships, thoughts and ideals are not valid unless they are approved of and shared by others. For me and for many here we do not ask for nor require your sanction. We will act in the way we see fit…
/r/RedPillWomen28/08/14 09:07 AM
1

No love is unconditional, period. If it was, it would be horrific and a sign of dysfunction. As with so many things, Ayn Rand had it about right. It is often said that true love is “unconditional,” or that “love is blind.” If this were true, falling in love would be akin to throwing darts, and we would simply happen upon certain people whom we loved for no reason whatsoever. And if love were unconditional, nothing they ever did, no matter how hurtful or evil, could make us abandon that love. Obj…
/r/askTRP23/08/14 02:44 AM
1

A core tenant of /r/theredpill[2] is that you can’t negotiate desire. This. This+. This++.
/r/TheRedPill30/07/14 06:33 PM
1

In the opinion of the Red Pill, is this going to help or hinder my MAP? Help, if you play it right. As someone who has been in the BDSM community a long time, I have seen what works and doesn't work during the transitions from an essentially equal / beta relationship to a workable alpha one. Often, those transitions were kicked by an external catalyst. What you need to do is take her enthusiasm as HER finally seeing the light. Get her, if you can, to openly express how much it turns her on. If s…
/r/askTRP28/07/14 06:32 PM
2

She is facing serious legal trouble if everything she said is true. This. I sincerely hope that /u/yasserkhan1 takes full advantage od every legal recourse available to show that actions like this are not consequence free. Given all his attackers posturing on how important it is to hold people responsible for their actions, I am sure she will agree with his pursuit of every civil and criminal remedy the law allows.
/r/MensRights28/07/14 02:38 AM
1

The Fountainhead by Ayn Rand. It is much more relationship centric and accessible than Atlas Shrugged. A great look into a female character who is both incredibly competent and very dedicated to a man she feels is worth that dedication.
/r/RedPillWomen20/07/14 06:57 AM
1

A lawyer, or just let it the hell go.
/r/askTRP11/05/14 05:38 AM
16

"I swear by my life, and my love of it, that I will never live for the sake of another man, nor ask another man to live for mine." Ayn Rand, in Atlas Shrugged
/r/TheRedPill10/05/14 09:58 PM
10

By almost all accounts Tom is a polite, friendly guy who has a very strong internal frame. He has worked very hard to get where he is, and doesn't rest on past success but adds new business and personal skills as needed. In short, here is a guy living his life as he sees fit, making a ton of money doing it, banging the women he desires and enjoying every single second of it. You want to pretend he isn't alpha as hell just because you think scientology is stupid (and it sure as shit is)? Go ahead…
/r/TheRedPill09/05/14 03:50 AM
1

Step 1: Realize that "incel" is not a real thing, and give up adopting made up victimizations for yourself.
/r/askTRP21/04/14 01:11 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter