TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

reallinustorvalds Archive

View 4 posts and 560 comments by reallinustorvalds on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
–

I bet you liked it
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/25 09:32 AM
–

Fair enough, here's another option: I make love with your husband's penis hole and inject him full of the good stuff. Then, while it's still piping hot in his balls, you guys do the deed. It's called an oil change. Can you start sounding his penis in preparation for this? He should be dilating daily, gradually increase the diameter of the metal rods.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/25 08:19 AM
1

Right, and engineering is a broad discipline that, at minimum, entails math and physics. So many of the famous philosophers, theologians and orators dabbled in STEM, this is especially true amongst the Hellenes.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/25 08:10 AM
1

What the fuck? Of course they had engineering
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/25 07:46 AM
–

How about you, me and your hubby get together and we Handmaid's Tale this bitch. I'm thinking he lays on top of me and I slip my pecker between his cute little thighs. That way, from your perspective, he is the one being ridden. I'll even throw in a reach around for your husband.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/25 07:43 AM
2

Lawyers aren't even essential for a functioning society. I have no idea what she is talking about. Obviously most societies throughout history didn't have a legal system even remotely comparable to our modern one.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/25 05:02 AM
2

You're right, it would suck, but none of those jobs are truly essential. Society would still be functional without them. This even includes nurses (mortality rates increasing isn't enough to completely ruin everything). Compare that to our infrastructure collapsing, we'd immediately revert back to agrarianism.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/25 04:59 AM
0

Well, for the most part I agree with him. I am a huge fan of literature, history and other liberal arts, but I recognize that those fields aren’t difficult to comprehend, especially compared to hard sciences. The degrees are much easier to acquire.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/25 06:00 PM
-2

They’re not essential, that’s the point.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/25 04:43 PM
-5

What do the words ‘intellectual’ and ‘cerebral’ even mean to you? You’re acting like every jackass getting a degree in history or literature is some great thinker. They obviously have lower IQs than people getting STEM degrees, and IQ is generalized intelligence. So, they’re generally dumber. What even is a coding student? Computer science? I don’t think you realize how abstract and theoretical numerous concepts in CS are.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/25 04:42 PM
5

(#) hessomid on TikTok Most of the men this woman criticizes are merely commenting about how they don't like the look of famous women who've gone overboard with plastic surgery. Which makes perfect sense, because the creator of this tiktok account is clearly botched. She's so insecure lol
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/25 06:35 AM
0

Wouldn't most career women just take their maternity leave for a few months, then send their baby to a daycare? If I married a successful female attorney or surgeon, I wouldn't just expect her to put her career on pause for years. So when you say they are the 'default parent', wtf does that even mean? The default assumption for men married to these types of women would be that their wife will not put her career on pause for years. It's extremely unlikely that a guy would marry a woman like that …
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/25 09:08 AM
3

In the early 2000s, women were not held back from joining the workforce in any way
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/25 06:02 AM
-2

Women are the ones initiating divorce in most cases
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/25 05:53 AM
1

Did you commit infanticide? You seem to post about it quite a lot.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/25 08:56 PM
1

This is not true. There is absolutely zero evidence supporting the idea that most women committing infanticide are <=19 years old, traumatized, etc. Stop making shit up.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/25 08:55 PM
-1

Well, you’re wrong. Most men want to feel needed. Most men want their wives to be financially reliant on them, because it gives them authority and power over their women. Most men do not want their wife to go to a job where she flirts with her ‘work husband’ for 8 hours every day. That last one is just disgusting. Men would happily sacrifice their wives’ income and move their family into a trailer park if it meant they could have those things. How the fuck does it take 2 incomes? Because you are…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/25 10:59 AM
5

What does "user" even mean? The goal of most well-adjusted men is to be the single provider of their family. Are their stay-at-home wives "using" them? Even guys spending loads of money to date and have sex with hot young chicks aren't being "used". Is Leonardo DiCaprio being "used" when he busts all over the perky tits of a 19 year old?! I don't think so.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/25 10:21 AM
–

Right, I'm sure women like you practice what you preach. Especially when you're paying surrogates to use and abuse their wombs.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/25 09:18 AM
6

Offt comments like this remind me why men avoid women who are rapidly losing their fertility (if they haven't already)
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/25 09:04 AM
–

Yes, they do. I agree with you that sociological/psychological studies aren't real science most of the time; however, using the Big 5 model is the scientific standard when examining personality traits.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/25 09:23 PM
–

It’s not debatable, it’s a statistical reality. A significantly higher percentage of women have mental illnesses/disorders. Studies exploring trait theory almost always find women score higher in neuroticism as well.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/25 07:29 PM
–

However, more children doesn't automatically mean more productivity — especially if those children are born into poverty, poor health, or limited education. Humans are extremely valuable. More humans does result in increased productivity. It is almost always beneficial to have more people, the only exception to this might be if there is an ongoing famine. Obviously it's not great to have a bunch of orphans running around (e.g. Romania in the 80s). However, the situation I'm describing would larg…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/25 07:22 PM
–

Empirical evidence? Women are significantly more likely to have neuroses than men. They have more mental illnesses. Anecdotal evidence? Every interaction with women I’ve ever had
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/25 06:44 PM
–

You've failed to show any causation between male authority over women and the historic success of humanity. Your position is, ironically, asinine. Men holding power across all area of life = women relying on men (particularly their partners) to survive = more marriages = more children Once again, you cannot discount the fact that this was a fundamental aspect of most human societies. You just can't. It shaped the ways men and women interacted with eachother for thousands of years. I'm not talkin…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/25 10:42 AM
–

What? I don't abuse women.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/25 10:18 AM
–

Why don't you learn how to form a real argument instead of whining about correlation versus causation? It's a horrible argument, especially considering men having authority over women was a fundamental aspect of most human societies. It'd be like arguing that agricultural wasn't integral to the success of humanity. This is asinine. False cause. Housing costs, urbanisation, changing priorities... Lots of factors influence birth rates. Do you have to work harder to have housing than most of your a…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/25 10:01 AM
–

I'm not a misogynist, I don't have contempt for women. Regardless, I don't lead with this and I never would. I wait for my girlfriends to become attached before I start letting out my true beliefs. And guess what? I've never been dumped.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/25 09:33 AM
–

Being "strict" with them is not only immoral but a losing battle. It's a losing battle? You realize it worked and served our species well for 99% of recorded history, right? I'm not a fan of birth-rate alarmism, but one could make an argument that what you are proposing is the true losing strategy, considering the rates at which we reproduce have plummeted. How is it immoral? Let's try this: Are there any groups of people you think it is morally acceptable to have authority over? For example, ch…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/25 09:13 AM
–

And yes, women are smaller, weaker, more vulnerable Yes, I'd also like to add that the weakness isn't merely physical, it's mental as well. Their psychology is extremely fragile. That is the biggest reason why I think men should indeed sort of mentally detach themselves from women more, in a sense. This is where I disagree with you. I think we need to be more strict with women and give them hard guidance, like a parent would to their rebellious child. I think men without any women in their life …
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/25 08:47 AM
–

I don't lie about it
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/25 06:17 AM
–

This is not correct. I will try to explain it as simply as possible for you. The nerves in the clitoris are located in the same position of the clitoris (directly around the opening of the vagina). These nerves branch off of the dorsal nerve, which runs near the surface of perineum up to the vagina. It's not embedded in the vaginal muscle, it runs through the perineal pouch and along the bottom of the pubis ramus (bones located in the pelvis). You're just out of your depths here. You have no ide…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/25 02:02 AM
–

Did you even read that article? Look at the life-size model of the clitoris it shows. It exclusively wraps around the opening with a maximum depth of a few centimeters. This is just sad. Everyone who actually researches this will know that you are wrong. Stop making up bullshit about female anatomy.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/25 09:27 PM
–

The internal location of the clitoris does not align with the supposed location of the g-spot. Are you familiar with female anatomy at all? The clitoris exclusively wraps around the opening of the vagina, it does not extend into the female body 2-3 inches, which is where the g-spot is supposedly located.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/25 07:22 PM
–

No, you’ve exposed yourself as an unemployed person suffering from various neuroses. That’s why so many are hesitant to engage with you.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/25 05:21 PM
–

Really? That’s what you think you are doing?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/25 05:09 PM
–

You SPAM every comment section on this subreddit with the most bizarre claims, most of which are full of completely unrelated information. What is the point?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/25 05:02 PM
0

Ignorance is bliss for a guy like you
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/25 12:19 PM
0

Once again, this is basic anatomical information. If you don't know this, then what good would a source even be? You wouldn't understand the source.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/25 11:01 AM
1

A bicep is significantly different in form and function. If you understood the anatomy, you'd know a more apt analogy would be me curling my bicep, but that is beyond the point. Human genitals are extremely vulnerable, especially vaginas. If you don't think we've evolved mechanisms to avoid excessive harm, then you are clueless. One of the reasons why women menstruate (versus estrus) is to rid themselves of pathogens brought in by men. It'd be like if I stretched my bicep out as far as I could, …
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/25 11:00 AM
0

That’s all I claimed. I provided an explanation regarding how/why these muscles change.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/25 07:28 PM
1

I’m not lonely or bitter. This is just one of your fantasies.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/25 07:26 PM
0

Unlikely
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/25 07:25 PM
1

Wow, apparently you can’t even read. Notice I said “any muscle in the general vicinity of the vagina”. Do you not know what that means?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/25 07:24 PM
-1

The trauma of birth causes the vagina to loosen considerably in many women, obviously. Any muscle in the general vicinity of the vagina can be severely weakened and damaged by birth, that’s why lots of moms have issues holding in their pee.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/25 01:03 PM
0

We’re talking about a muscle. Do you think that muscles remained fixed throughout a person’s entire life? They can change rather drastically based on environmental factors. This is basic anatomical information. If you don’t know this shit I’m not sure how a source would help. You wouldn’t even understand what you are reading.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/25 12:54 PM
-3

Nobody here wants to LARP with you. Every single person who reads this already knows that you do not have an “uncommonly large” penis.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/25 12:49 PM
-2

No shit, that's the point. It's a tube made out of muscle. Muscle is one of the most adaptable tissues in the human body. Muscles do not remain in a fixed state, they change frequently in response to environmental factors.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/25 11:49 AM
-9

Seems like you haven't, this is basic biology. You realize that when your body experiences physical stress/harm, it adapts to prevent a similar situation from occurring in the future, right?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/25 11:05 AM
-8

The issue is that it's not made of memory foam. Instead it's made out of living tissues that your body adjusts and changes in response to external stimuli.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/25 11:04 AM
-6

Don't you know anything about vaginas? It's not a joke. The immune response following coitus with a new person results in a general "loosening" of the vagina During sex, micro-tears occur within the vaginal tissues. This is especially the case when you're having sex with someone who has a larger penis than normal, because your vagina is stretching in ways it has not adapted to accommodate. Also, if you're having sex with a new man, he has a unique ecosystem on his penis that you haven't been exp…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/25 10:58 AM
-25

I know some girls who have to use jumbo tampons Well it's not like that is genetic. Wide vagina is from having sex with lots of different men. The varying penis sizes causes the vagina to stretch in unique ways, this widens the vagina.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/25 10:23 AM
2

It’s a slogan used by PSYOP (psychological operations) units in the military. You basically said that you’d rather be physically harmed than emotionally (psychologically) damaged. So it seemed relevant.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/25 08:12 PM
2

You’ve just been fucked by psyops Because physical wounds heal
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/25 07:10 PM
0

Cool. I don’t take any sociological studies seriously.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/25 07:09 PM
1

Nothing I said was an appeal to nature fallacy I didn't accuse you of making an appeal to nature fallacy. I didn't say "it's right because it happens in nature" I didn't say you said it was morally right, either. Nothing I even said implies that I interpreted your argument that way. I thought your argument was that it is inevitable, and I disagree with that. I was specifically addressing your notion that "society" is the reason men pursue women, as if without "society" the male sex drive wouldn'…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/25 07:10 AM
2

You're LARPing as an enlightened man, but everyone reading this sees right through it
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/25 04:17 AM
17

This is how it is in Korea, too. It's not exactly a cohesive movement.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/25 04:14 AM
1

It completely invalidates your point. You minimize the extreme societal expectations of men.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/25 05:35 PM
1

Ok. So you’d be fine with the government/society reserving the right to use your womb however it pleases then? Stop lying. Be honest for once in your life.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/25 05:16 PM
3

There is an EXPECTATION that men will. Do you not understand what that means? You realize every 18 year old man has to sign up with the selective service, right? It doesn’t matter if it hasn’t been used in decades, they are still EXPECTED to go to war and die for women/children if our country needs to be protected. Imagine if, on your 18th birthday, the government forced you to sign a contract stating “if the population gets too low, we reserve the right to use your body to generate new citizens…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/25 04:12 PM
1

The government wouldn't have to enforce anything. They could provide incentives, e.g. even larger tax credits for married couples, especially ones that increase with the duration of your marriage. Ideally, society should heavily encourage it naturally through social stigma. People behaving in these manners should be shunned and shamed. I suppose the government could facilitate this by ensuring employers are able to discriminate based on sexual/relationship histories (e.g. marital status). That w…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/25 09:55 AM
1

I assumed it was a rhetorical question. I don't want to play "guess a number" with you, just get on with it old man
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/25 09:36 AM
-1

The 1% already pays 40% of all income taxes. We don’t know what was truly common among regular people and their day-to-day interactions. We like to think that everyone was having sex within monogamous relationships because that’s what was portrayed, but humans have always been human. Single mothers were stigmatized and shunned in the vast majority of societies. Reliable birth control and abortion methods did not exist. At minimum, having sex outside of stable relationships was extremely disincen…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/25 09:34 AM
4

Did you fail to register with the selective service?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/25 09:09 AM
3

There is no rage quitting. Show me where the rage is? Are you serious? You wrote a paragraph explaining, in detail, why you think conversing with that man is beneath you. That entire comment is you seething about things that aren't even relevant to this discussion.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/25 05:39 AM
4

How exactly do you determine whether or not something is totalitarian? I think it is totalitarian to lose over 30% of my income to taxes, but as a society we make concessions to keep things functional. I have to sign up for the selective service and consent to being drafted, which is clearly totalitarian. However, I am able to concede that if our nation needs men to fight and defend it, then my bodily autonomy no longer matters. This whole experiment in "free love" is a pretty new thing, wasn't …
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/25 05:30 AM
5

The only reason why the housing shortage even exists is because of zoning laws and civilian protests. There are developers who want to buy plots of land and put up affordable apartment buildings, but their efforts get blocked by local property owners (mostly boomers). That's why all of the new complexes being built are tall, "luxury" apartment buildings. Local residents allow this to happen because it inflates their property values. Putting up a cheap, affordable "commie block" inspired apartmen…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/25 05:00 AM
7

They did this elsewhere in this comment thread too. It's bizarre that they even feel the need to leave these responses saying "I am not engaging with you" when they could just not respond.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/25 04:52 AM
4

It seems like you're the only person not willing to have an honest dialogue. Your rebuttal was basically just "uhhh no this doesn't apply to relationships because I feel like it shouldn't". Then you rage quit when they pointed out why your stance makes no sense.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/25 04:49 AM
7

What the hell are you talking about? Of course this can be legislated. States absolutely can enforce monogamous relationships.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/25 04:47 AM
4

men competing for women has nothing to do with fanciful notions of "gender norms"... Please see the rest of the animal kingdom for supporting evidence We live in civilizations which we built to avoid the chaotic frenzy of the natural world. Living in a society has caveats, we are all expected to behave in a morally responsible way to prevent discontent and strife. If the laws of the jungle applied to human societies, bitter men would simply go to a rival's house, stab him in the face, steal his …
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/25 04:41 AM
1

Well society already expects men to die for women they don't even know lol. Men don't even have bodily autonomy.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/25 04:14 AM
4

Yes. Mini like my penis. It's so small. Maybe micro is better for that.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/25 08:00 AM
1

A real man is at minimum 6’3. Not bald, he needs to have a beautiful head of hair like Odysseus. Thats what makes a real man: height and hair. If you lack height and hair then you are a fantasy dwarf. Which is fine, but you aren’t a real man. You’re a mythical creature from the Lord of the Rings.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/25 01:03 AM
1

Yes, they definitely do. Even if they rarely get laid they still lead with it. Many such cases. Sad!
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/25 12:59 AM
3

Eventually you drink enough shit water you build up a tolerance. I have an iron stomach because I used to deep throat artisan wells as a kid. Would run around all day then my friends would crank the handle on these rusty wells from the 1900s while I jammed the entire spout down my throat. Those things pull farm run off directly out of the earth so I’m basically impervious to shit water.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/25 12:09 AM
0

I think most guys willing to fuck are willing to date, potentially even marry. Depends on whether or not they have options, most guys don’t have a lot of options so they’d probably be willing to date.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/25 12:07 AM
15

Miny lol
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/25 12:03 AM
2

Well, I disagree. I'm fairly confident that most of society agrees with me, I mean our laws clearly do not make distinctions over consent. For example, two months ago an OF model was charged with murder because she saran wrapped some gooner's head and he suffocated to death. She had his consent to wrap him up, and that obviously comes with a risk of death. The weirdest thing was the reaction from these S&M people I'd see on Reddit: "This doesn't mean bondage and erotic asphyxiation are dangerous…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/25 08:46 AM
5

Young boys and girls can also end up watching rough sex and s&m without understanding the consent that needs to happen in those situations. Sadism and masochism are completely depraved and deranged regardless of whether or not there is "consent". If you derive sexual pleasure from harming yourself and/or others, then you are a danger to yourself and/or others. Some of the associated sex acts are more blatantly harmful than others, e.g. there is no situation where you can safely asphyxiate yourse…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/25 06:59 AM
-1

If you think I’ve been ‘annihilated’, you must be confused.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/25 11:34 AM
1

Not really. They've successfully refuted a statement I made about UK law. That's it.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/25 09:55 AM
0

You are the only person in this comment section that actually knows what you are talking about. These people think mental disorders are tangible and real concepts, even though the entire definition of a disorder stands in opposition to that. If we knew of biological mechanisms that cause postpartum depression/psychosis, these 'conditions' would be classified as diseases, not disorders.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/25 09:53 AM
1

Mothers overwhelmingly kill their own children.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/25 09:47 AM
1

I already conceded that I misunderstood the law. You made the completely asinine and insane claim that infanticide is a separate crime for "tracking purposes".
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/25 09:43 AM
1

Oh, so you have faith. Good for you.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/25 09:35 AM
1

That's hysterical
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/25 09:33 AM
1

Why don't mothers who murder their children use "diminished responsibility" as their defense? Why are they charged with an entirely separate crime?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/25 08:55 AM
1

That's the entire point. Do you think it was a valid disorder or "serious illness" when it was recognized as one by the medical community? Because that is the argument you are making, the only thing defining "disorders" is their recognition as "disorders".
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/25 08:51 AM
1

most clinicians can agree on many of them Eh, inter-rater reliability is laughably low for a myriad of illnesses/conditions. For all others, it's never 100%. Doesn't the fact that there is any disagreement at all imply that this is not an exact science? It's more of an abstraction... A "disorder" can never be a reliable explanation for a behavior, because we don't even understand its supposed mechanisms. Just because they aren’t always easily defined and they often have overlaps doesn’t mean the…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/25 08:07 AM
1

They have a diagnosis from a clinician, and as you know all doctors (and in particular psychs) are infallible and always right.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/25 07:33 AM
1

“It’s beyond me that people who don’t subscribe to pseudoscience are skeptical about my pseudoscientific claims”
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/25 07:31 AM
0

They literally answer these questions in the paper. Why don’t you fucking read it?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/25 07:30 AM
1

No mental illness is a “serious illness”. If you believe this, then you must concede that homosexuality is a “serious illness”, considering it used to be in the DSM and classified as one.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/25 07:29 AM
1

No it does not lol
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/25 07:28 AM
1

And you advocate for harmful pseudoscience.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/25 07:26 AM
-1

You have no idea what you’re talking about. It’s not even worth arguing with you. Good luck with that.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/25 07:25 AM
1

There is no such thing. Clinicians rarely, if ever, agree 100% on the diagnosis of mental conditions. So what the hell is a “genuine mental illness”? It’s completely intangible.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/25 07:22 AM
0

And they’re silent, of course
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/25 07:20 AM
1

I don’t think you are understanding me. You realize that we don’t have a special charge with more lenient punishments for people who murdered others while they were experiencing psychosis? There is no “psychosicide”, just homicide, and if you were experiencing psychosis you can plead temporary insanity. The fact that the infanticide laws and entirely separate charges even exist backs up my point. I’m getting tired of repeating myself.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/25 07:19 AM
0

Prove god doesn’t exist
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/25 07:15 AM
-2

I did. Wtf is wrong with you people?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/25 07:14 AM
1

What?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/25 07:13 AM
-1

Why would I need to do that? You haven’t even provided empirical evidence. Just an article by the ACLU which has been widely disputed.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/25 08:13 PM
0

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/274998251_Gender_and_Sentencing_in_the_Federal_Courts_Are_Women_Treated_More_Leniently Looking at gender, net of legal factors, the odds of incarceration for females are 39% lower than the odds of incarceration for males. Females are much less likely to be imprisoned, even when controlling for severity of the crime, criminal history of the defendant, etc. After controlling for legal factors, female defendants receive sentences approximately 23% shorter th…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/25 07:27 PM
1

There is no "good debating technique", just the logic of argumentation. You can make any argument you want if it is supported by evidence and/or reason.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/25 07:08 PM
-8

Are you suffering from psychosis? No it was not.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/25 07:05 PM
-1

Do you know what psychosis is? Most studies only show that is has moderate inter-rater reliability, so apparently clinicians don't even agree on what it is.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/25 07:00 PM
1

That's a bullshit stat from a random article written by the ACLU, it's been repeatedly disproven. It's not a fact, it wasn't sourced from scientific literature lol
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/25 06:59 PM
1

Mental illness isn't a real, tangible concept. It's made-up by humans to describe behaviors determined to be abnormal by prevailing societal beliefs and values. That's it. Homosexuality used to be in the DSM. Because of this, no mental illness is ever diagnosed on a purely objective basis. Clinicians rarely, if ever, agree 100% on a diagnosis. The measure of their agreement is referred to as inter-rater reliability, it typically ranges between 40-80% depending on the condition. Keep in mind, thi…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/25 06:54 PM
-6

I was wrong about a single aspect of the UK law! I got WRECKED! Get a grip
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/25 06:38 PM
1

Is women receiving lighter sentences for baby murder not also an objective, measurable fact? If anything, the sentencing disparity between men and women is most profound here.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/25 06:37 PM
0

No I don’t.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/25 06:34 PM
1

You should familiarize yourself with other discussions that have already occurred in this thread so I’m not forced to endlessly repeat myself to you people. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/274998251_Gender_and_Sentencing_in_the_Federal_Courts_Are_Women_Treated_More_Leniently
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/25 06:27 PM
0

Thanks for the advice, I don’t really care about it. My argument is still correct, I’m not interested in making it more palatable for women. That’d just be more of the same ‘babying’ this post is about.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/25 06:26 PM
2

What ‘expert’? Hahaha. You people just make shit up, it’s as if you’re suffering from psychosis yourself. Being wrong about a singular aspect of the law in the UK doesn’t disprove my entire argument, obviously. I already conceded I was incorrect about these laws automatically applying to all women. My argument still stands though, it has not been ‘destroyed’.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/25 06:23 PM
2

There are studies that control for legal factors like criminal history, severity of the crime, etc and still find disparities. So, you are wrong.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/25 06:17 PM
1

No, I wasn’t.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/25 06:09 PM
1

No, it’s not. The only thing I was wrong about was whether or not the law automatically applies to all women lol. That’s literally it. The laws still exist to baby women.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/25 06:07 PM
1

No, clearly I’m not wrong. You realize my argument relies on more than a singular aspect of the law in the UK, right? You’re having difficulties with that, aren’t you?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/25 06:06 PM
1

They are provided with an easy and standardized way to plead temporary insanity and receive very light sentences. This differs wildly from most other situations, as proving insanity is typically very difficult.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/25 06:04 PM
1

Can you not read? I already did in other comments. CTRL-F on my profile for SIDS
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/25 06:02 PM
0

🤮
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/25 06:01 PM
1

I am right.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/25 06:01 PM
0

Why don’t you use Google. Go ahead. Or check my other comments considering I already sent a source for this.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/25 06:00 PM
0

Yes I can. I already did.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/25 05:59 PM
-1

Are you admitting I am correct then? You just said that temporary insanity isn’t easy to prove. So essentially, when women kill their children they receive a lower standard of evidence compared to other crimes.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/25 05:59 PM
1

That’s not what it says either. Are you unable to read?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/25 05:57 PM
0

You have no idea what you are talking about
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/25 05:56 PM
0

I disagree
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/25 05:56 PM
-1

In this case the man was literally asleep and supposedly suffering from a condition similar to sleep walking. It’s much different from infanticide cases, where the mother is in control of herself and murdered her baby for a reason, even if she isn’t in the best state of mind. She’s still aware of what she is doing.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/25 05:55 PM
2

Most of the women who commit these crimes still have an iota of control over themselves and their actions.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/25 05:53 PM
1

What are you even arguing? Explain what you mean by ‘crime dynamics’. This is incoherent
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/25 05:51 PM
1

No, I don’t think it is.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/25 05:44 PM
-1

Why do women always do this? I admitted I was wrong in that comment. What was I wrong about? One aspect of the law in the UK? The laws still exist for the reasons I stated, they are there to give women less severe punishments for the murder of their children.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/25 05:42 PM
-2

No it doesn’t. Are you not able to read? That’s not even remotely close to what it says. My original statement that it is “upwards of 10% according to some studies” is more accurate than your reading of it.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/25 11:32 AM
0

You don’t think men can temporarily experience psychosis and murder someone? What the hell? I don’t think you know what mental illnesses even are, but you’re not ready for that conversation.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/25 11:29 AM
-8

I highly doubt that this is for tracking purposes. That doesn’t make much sense at all, especially considering the charge is handled differently than a normal insanity plea. Instead of being forcibly detained in a mental hospital for an indefinite amount of time, they are given a normal, but very short prison sentence. So clearly the intention is to not treat it as an insanity plea, it’s to treat it as a normal criminal charge with a slap on the wrist as the punishment (relative to more typical …
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/25 11:20 AM
-3

My arguments don’t fall flat at all. You realize there is a completely separate, more lenient charge for women in these situations, correct? If they were treated exactly the same, they would be charged with homicide, for which they could plead insanity. My argument that a significant percentage of homicides are intentionally overlooked as SIDS or “accidental” deaths still stands as well. Our society literally lets women get away with murder. You also completely overlooked what I just stated. It …
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/25 11:10 AM
1

Just use Google. This is directly from Wikipedia: Some estimates in the 1980s and 1990s placed the potential rate of SIDS deaths caused by maltreatment around 10% and as high as 40%, but data from interventions such as the Safe to Sleep campaign suggest that these figures were substantially inflated. In 2006, the American Academy of Pediatrics estimated that between 1% and 5% of SIDS cases were potentially attributable to undiagnosed infanticide. The sources for these claims are available on the…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/25 11:04 AM
1

You realize that if a man experiences psychosis, murders someone and successfully uses insanity as a defense, they are forcibly detained in a mental hospital for an indefinite amount of time?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/25 10:36 AM
0

No. Just that a significant percentage of SIDS deaths are actually homicide, upwards of 10% according to some studies.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/25 10:31 AM
-6

What exactly was I wrong about? The idea that it automatically applies to all women in the UK, that’s really it. I don’t know why you got your panties in a bunch, I already conceded that. Infanticide is still a charge that has more lenient punishments and is usually exclusively for mothers (women). This aligns with every study I’ve seen on criminal punishments for women, they aren’t sentenced as frequently and are given shorter sentenced when they are. My argument hasn’t changed, nor has it been…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/25 10:29 AM
4

Yes: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/274998251_Gender_and_Sentencing_in_the_Federal_Courts_Are_Women_Treated_More_Leniently Looking at gender, net of legal factors, the odds of incarceration for females are 39% lower than the odds of incarceration for males. Females are much less likely to be imprisoned, even when controlling for severity of the crime, criminal history of the defendant, etc. After controlling for legal factors, female defendants receive sentences approximately 23% short…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/25 10:02 AM
1

You're not even addressing any of my arguments. It is impossible to have a real conversation with you. The death penalty for homosexuality exists in Islamic countries because of extreme religious views that promote violent punishments, obviously. According to you, we supposedly have this "patriarchy" concept in the Occident, and you believe it impacts our court systems. So why don't we execute gay people, if "patriarchy" is what causes these cruel and discriminatory laws? You've attributed rando…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/25 09:53 AM
8

Dude thinks depression is a valid justification for murder, but only if the perpetrator has a vagina.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/25 09:34 AM
3

No it's not. You're not understanding what they are saying. Systems are built and maintained by people. You're attempting to abstract the system from society, but the system is merely an extension of society, so it inevitably reflects societal values. This is especially true for judicial systems, as the entire point is to enforce societal values. The punishment for homosexuality is death in numerous Islamic countries (Saudi Arabia, Iran, Afghanistan, etc). You think the judicial systems of these…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/25 09:21 AM
2

That wouldn't be duress. Duress is being coerced into it via threats or force.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/25 09:05 AM
4

Read the second sentence in my comment.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/25 08:41 AM
6

Where are you getting this information from? There's no reason to assume this at all. The vast majority of pregnancies are from adult women. Only 13.6 out of 1,000 births are from women between the ages of 15-19 (with 75% of those being within the 18-19 year old age range).
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/25 08:39 AM
1

Judges merely attempt to facilitate, interpret and apply the law. The law reflects the values of a society. Did you miss this part of my comment? Clearly society has and still does think that women shouldn't be held responsible when they intentionally kill their own children, because even when these "archaic" laws aren't on the books, we will attribute the deaths of those children to SIDS and/or write them off as accidental. The law can be entirely removed from these situations, and society as a…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/25 08:35 AM
3

Are you suffering from a mental illness as a result of those nine months? It would only matter if I chose to plea insanity. If I did, then this would be determined in court. This is the case for all other crimes, that is the point. Instead of women pleaing insanity when they kill their children, we have an entirely separate charge for their crime with less severe punishments.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/25 08:27 AM
3

That claim is just factually incorrect. Most of these cases are not children. You're either wrong or intentionally lying.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/25 08:22 AM
4

I just answered this question.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/25 08:20 AM
3

So what? Let's say I was forced to provide physically demanding, 24/7 care for a family member. After 9 months, I completely lose it and decide to kill them. That'd still be murder.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/25 08:18 AM
-24

You're correct, I may have misinterpreted the law. Regardless, I don't think it's wrong to assume that the standard of evidence is much lower than a defense of insanity or even temporary insanity, because otherwise I'm not sure why they would make this a separate crime.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/25 08:13 AM
4

Ok. So what are you saying? That I am correct and women are babied by society?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/25 08:06 AM
6

Did you not read my post? I'm referring to mothers killing their own children. Is your argument that every murderous mother is mentally ill and thus not responsible for her own actions? Because that's the idea behind why these laws exist and automatically apply to any women who kill their own children, I already explained that in my post. Whether or not they have post-natal depression isn't even considered, it's just automatically assumed that they cannot be held responsible for homicide.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/25 08:05 AM
7

Being handed a benefit from the Patriarchy because a judge thinks you're hot isn't the woman's fault. It's as if you didn't understand a single thing I wrote. These are the laws, not a judge making a willy-nilly decision. The women cannot be charged with homicide, because the crime they committed is "infanticide", and it is punished much less severely. Laws generally reflect the greater moral views of a society. Clearly society has and still does think that women shouldn't be held responsible wh…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/25 08:01 AM
2

I disagree. If I exclusively acted on instinct, I’d be sniffing women’s crotches and asses in public, like a dog. That isn’t even a joke, when I see a hot girl I feel an impulse to smell her, as if there is some depraved animal living within me. Clearly humans are able to suppress and rise above their own instincts. If this were not the case, we’d be completely feral. I definetly would be.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/25 06:39 AM
2

I’m not clicking on that shit
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/25 06:01 AM
1

unhealed trauma+mental illness running rampant in recent times I really like the implication that people have no control over their own minds. They're all just victims to these completely made-up, intangible concepts invented by other humans.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/25 04:44 AM
1

I don't get it either. Why do these women get so upset about this topic? Are they telling on themselves? Are they indirectly admitting that they were immature and lacking in critical thinking capabilities until they reached their mid twenties? Do they think that teenage women cannot be responsible because they were not? Maybe not. You gave that OnlyFans example. I think most of the women raging about this would be perfectly fine with, possibly even supportive of, a 19 year old who wanted to star…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/25 03:31 AM
1

Love bombing is not buying gifts or paying attention. Love bombers are consciously aware that they’re lying and manipulating. Oh baby I’ve never met anyone like you before. We are gonna run away together. Your mother and father don’t understand you I bet. Yeah I sensed that. Well I do. You and are have something so special.” - a love bomber in the first week. I've researched "love bombing" now because you brought it up. This would only be "love bombing" if the guy was planning on abusing the wom…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/25 03:19 AM
0

Lovebombing is a real thing. According to who? Random psychologists? Absolutely nothing in that field is an exact science. Regardless, I'll play along. Let's see what Wikipedia has to say: Excessive attention and affection does not constitute love bombing if there is no intent or pattern of further abuse. The way they used the term was incorrect. It's only "love bombing" if it's part of a larger cycle of abuse, e.g. the man abuses the woman and then buys her gifts or is highly affectionate to ma…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/25 03:17 AM
0

A pig butchering scam is usually just a romance scam used alongside an investment scam, which is exactly how I described it. They start on dating apps. I know some of those scammers pretend to be an old friend or "wrong number" text, but most of the time romance is a factor. It is very effective at inducing wishful thinking and building trust.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/25 10:37 PM
1

Yep. It's funny how people think "therapy" is somehow synonymous with maturation. If anything, every person I've met who is obsessed with therapy seems to be trapped in a state of arrested development. Makes since, considering they've been discussing the same anxieties with a therapist on a weekly basis for years, instead of just moving on.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/25 08:47 PM
1

Your entire argument is based on a variety of assumptions that obviously don't fit every situation. You are basically making the argument that age gap relationships are bad because you personally think they are bad as the result of a variety of superstitions. For example, this idea that 18 year olds are more drawn to materialism. There's no evidence this is the case, do you really think an 18 year old will be more drawn to a millionaire than a 25 year old? If anything, the opposite is true, as i…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/25 08:45 PM
1

No.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/25 08:23 PM
1

If some guy sends a real Eastern European woman $50,000 because he thinks there's a small chance it will win her affection, he's not being scammed. No bank would reverse the charges for him, because he was not scammed. Once again I would think that you'd know this as someone who "works in fraud investigations". The term "romance scam" refers to a specific situation where someone is being duped into sending money because of a pretend relationship with a person who may not even exist. Sometimes th…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/25 08:11 PM
2

This is unlikely to be true if someone was actually scammed. The only way you can get your money back is by reporting it.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/25 08:02 PM
6

You were making your claims as if they were a matter of fact. Clearly you weren’t merely attempting to provide anecdotal experiences, because now you’re attempting to disregard the statistics I’ve provided with “men are less likely to report it”. Are you kidding me? That is another completely unsubstantiated claim. What the hell is it even based on? Your superstitions? It is blatantly false. Newsflash: Most people scammed out of a signicant percentage of their savings are going to report it to t…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/25 11:00 AM
2

It's ok. I would be angry too if I was you.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/25 10:33 AM
10

Ok? You're just wrong. Over 60% of romance scam victims are female.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/25 10:23 AM
2

Therapy Therapy? lol Same reason why young fresh grad employees are desired by corporations. Except for the most part they aren't. Corporations usually seek out people with experience. I've been hurt deeply and abused before by boys my age. But to be hurt in the same way by a man much older has more implications. Once again, the issue is that you're just automatically assuming the men are bad. What even is your argument? That age-gap relationships are bad because if the older man hurts your feel…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/25 10:21 AM
1

It’s wild to pretend an 18 year old suddenly is as wise in terms of how relationship dynamics work as a 39 year old. I'm sure there are plenty of 18 year old girls with vastly more relationship and sexual experience than some 39 year old men. This isn't even a far-fetched scenario anymore. Love bombing is extremely easy to do to the romantically inexperienced. Love bombing isn't even a real thing. It's absolutely not manipulation or abuse. I don't know why women feel the need to pathologies ever…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/25 10:16 AM
1

Yes it is
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/25 09:54 AM
5

As a woman in her mid 20s, I can confidently say the vast vast majority of 18 year olds cannot tell or do not have the experience to pick up on whether a man is abusive or not before it is too late. No, I don't think you can confidently say this. Either a man is abusive or he is not, if someone is unable to recognize whether or not they are being abused then there is most likely something wrong with them that won't just magically disappear with age. Trauma is no joke and can cripple your ability…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/25 09:54 AM
1

So people who can’t protect themselves from exploitation shouldn’t be able to vote or work normal (no child labor law restricted) hours? I'm not the one who made this argument. I pointed out that it makes zero sense to treat someone as an adult legally but not recognize them as one socially. Either you think people are old enough to think critically and make responsible choices or you don't. If you don't, then those people probably shouldn't be voting. Should people with slight intellectual disa…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/25 09:39 AM
4

That’s silly.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/25 09:22 AM
11

They're adults dude. If they can't "protect themselves from exploitation", they shouldn't be adults, they shouldn't have the right to vote. It's not like there is a magical age where you suddenly become less "easy to exploit". Middle aged women, including women who are familiar with the internet, are falling for romance scams on a daily basis. This is a huge problem in the US right now, ladies keep losing their life savings over these dumb scams. Some people will remain stupid and gullible their…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/25 08:48 AM
4

Exactly. Every friendship I've had with a woman that was more than us merely being acquaintances involved a sexual element, even if we never had sex. They'd ask me to come over and cuddle and then grind their asses into me until I busted and then they'd giggle.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/25 08:27 AM
-2

Especially considering you can train and shape a woman into your ideal wife while they are still young. I doubt I will have much in common with my future wife. I plan on trading with her dad, 2 mules for his 18 year old daughter. What will I have in common with an 18 year old I just traded for 2 mules? Absolutely nothing, but it doesn't matter. I can mold her like a soft, voluptuous piece of clay into my ideal TRAD wife.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/25 08:23 AM
8

I bet you do
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/25 09:44 PM
1

Are you asking me if I’ve hung out with western women? Yes, on numerous occasions. Or are you asking about a more specific aspect of my comment? I’ve never hung out with a mute American woman who would show me videos of animals. The Asian girl wasn’t actually mute, but practically speaking we were both mute to eachother because we couldn’t communicate properly. I have had American women sleep over and initiate sex with me. I obliged in those circumstances.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/25 08:22 PM
1

This occurred in America, the girl was here for a few months on a work visa. I’m not sure what you mean.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/25 07:20 PM
1

What
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/25 06:22 PM
1

I had a 2 week long fling with a girl who could hardly speak English, Southeast Asian. We'd go on dates, would hardly say anything to eachother and then sit in my room and she'd show me videos of animals and giggle. She slept over a few nights in her underwear and was clearly trying to get me to boink her but I wasn't sure. This is going to sound douchey, but when there is a language barrier, it's as if the person you're speaking with has an intellectual disability. Practically speaking there is…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/25 08:49 AM
–

Men get raped too. There are more male rape jokes than female rape jokes, obviously.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/25 10:08 AM
–

I see more jokes about males being raped in media than I do about women being raped. Jokes about men being raped are so common that they are even in Spongebob. "Look, doubloons! Don't drop em!" So is there a culture of rape against men?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/25 10:07 AM
–

Most divorces are initiated by the wife, so it has some basis in reality. Women are more willing to abandon their partners.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/25 10:03 AM
–

What "general consensus"? What the hell are you talking about. Have there been surveys done on this? He has a feminine face and lips, seems like he's short as well. He just looks a bit strange. I wouldn't say he is ugly, but he's definitely not good looking.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/25 02:47 AM
-1

That guy wasn’t good looking lol wtf
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/25 10:33 AM
–

No
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/25 08:55 AM
–

Woman put in too much effort. Everytime I ride an elevator with one it's like my eyes are watering from perfume. I would prefer a little coochie stank, it's invigorating. Would make my day if I could just bask in that sweet stench everytime I took the elevator, instead I am assaulted with noxious perfumes
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/25 08:49 AM
-1

I want to escape the existential solitude of individuality. I want to experience human connection and love that is so deep and rich that we coalesce into a singular entity. I want to merge my body and mind with my opposite, a woman, each of us completing each-other perfectly, forming a union that is so divine and pure we transcend physicality, eternally fuse and never stop fucking. Would it be nice if she was pretty, cooked for me, didn't have debt, etc? Yes. But ultimately I'm more of an ideali…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/25 06:40 AM
0

Yeah, most ugly dudes don’t seem to be in denial about it. They are well aware of their situation. That’s the entire focus of the ‘blackpill’ communities, it’s guys who are deeply aware of the fact that they are hopelessly ugly and unable to find love.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/25 09:59 PM
–

I thought I've read that it has been removed. I wouldn't be surprised if it was still in there though, Dissociative Identity Disorder is despite it not even being accepted or diagnosed by the majority of clinicians. It's just a joke.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/25 09:37 AM
–

I think ASD levels 2-3 are "real", meaning the diagnosis is warranted and sensible. Realistically though, no mental disorders or illnesses are "real", they are not tangible or based on physical reality. They are arbitrarily defined and heavily based on societal views at a specific time. That's why homosexuality used to be in the DSM. They also can never be diagnosed in a purely objective way, meaning clinicians will never 100% agree on a diagnosis for level 1 ASD. Imagine if that was the case fo…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/25 08:41 AM
–

And then your mom clapped
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/25 08:02 AM
–

I was diagnosed with autism as a kid. I no longer think it is a real disorder. Regardless, I have no issues getting strange. The secret is to be tall and of atleast average facial attractiveness. Have you tried that?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/25 08:00 AM
1

I’m not sure if you’re arguing in bad faith or merely confused, but the other studies he authored look at marital satisfaction and separation rates. Not sexual satisfaction. That’s the difference. If he’s looking at an entirely seperate phonemoneon, why would you perceive that as him retracting/disavowing his prior research? Do you have any idea what you’re talking about, at all? The studies we both referenced are regarding social sciences, so they should all be viewed with skepticism. However, …
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/25 07:18 PM
1

No. If anyone is pushing pseudoscience, it is you. Keep that in mind. Porn usage significantly decreases your capacity for self-control and increases the likelihood of you exhibiting "delay discounting" (choosing immediate gratification over a more valuable future reward): https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26305628/ This aligns perfectly with other addictive behaviors, as that is what defines addiction: An urge to partake in a behavior that benefits you short-term, despite it having negative long-…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/25 06:10 PM
3

Wrong. The shame exists for a valid reason most of the time. If someone was watching completely depraved, sick pornography and felt shame over it, do you still believe the solution is to brainwash them into ignoring their gut feeling? Also, as I stated in that comment, there are numerous other negative consequences. Shame isn’t the only one. Do you need me to walk you through them? The solution clearly is not to remove the shame. That is the stupidest thing I have ever heard.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/25 09:04 AM
1

You think the example I gave is harmful, then? You think that would harm their relationship more than it helps it? You have no idea what you are talking about.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/25 07:46 AM
1

I already gave you an example that isn't harmful.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/25 04:31 AM
0

She wants him because she see's him as her property. This is objectification. If you view someone as your property, you are either consciously or subconsciously reducing them down to an object that can be possessed. That's the point I was making, that objectification isn't inherently bad. It's an important aspect of healthy monogamous relationships.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/25 04:24 AM
3

They compulsively watch pornography, despite it having negative consequences on their lives. They are aware of the harm they are causing to themselves, and they want to stop, but feel an intense urge to watch pornography and then give in. It is an addiction. You seem to acknowledge one of the ways pornography causes them harm, yet refuse to acknowledge it as a real addiction? I'm referring to this: "They just feel bad about using porn." Shame is harmful. Doing something that makes you feel shame…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/25 04:19 AM
4

This is complete horseshit. Obviously incorrect. Do you think gambling addiction is real? Anything that floods your brain with "happy hormones" has the potential to be addicting. Some people become addicted to video games, exercise, etc. The fact that psychologists are happily spewing this non-sense is excellent evidence that their field is a pseudoscience.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/25 04:00 AM
1

I think it's bad for other reasons, it's just escapism. A psychologically sound individual shouldn't desire or seek out porn. I don't think objectification is inherently bad. Don't all healthy monogamous relationships require some level of mutual objectification? Both the husband and wife view each other as their personal property. For example, if some lady's friend starts hitting on her husband, she might say "fuck you bitch! he's mine!" and then start a cat fight. Do you think it'd be better i…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/25 03:43 AM
2

This is actually a good point and the purpose of obscenity laws. Lawmakers have come to the conclusion that porn at least has a minuscule amount of artistic merit and isn't pure obscenity, so it's generally protected under the first amendment. Regardless, the difference in artistic merit between most pornography and literature is massive.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/25 03:33 AM
7

There’s an equally harmful (if not more) proliferation of insecurities towards men through porn I think the harmful proliferation occurs more through women's fantasies than it does through porn. Like 50 Shades of Grey for example, it's about some tall, handsome billionaire dude. Guys might look up "nice ass" or some shit and that's enough for many of them, but most women have these convoluted fantasies that are impossible for the average man to compete with
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/25 03:30 AM
–

What I'm saying is that I don't think it's even that noticeable, calculating it down to a ratio just seems excessive, getting anxious or insecure about it is just whacky. Can most people tell the difference between 1:1.5 to 1:1.6? Unless the guys are completely naked and standing right next to each-other, probably not. Some of the guys I lift with focus on this excessively, that's the only reason why I know about it. Now, if you are morbidly obese or have Klinefelter's and your shoulders are nar…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/25 05:19 AM
10

I see a similar phenomenon with shoulder to hips ratio. A lot of men (especially men who lift weights) are super worried about looking like an inverted triangle, so much so that it becomes an insecurity. They desperately want to achieve the "Adonis index" (1:1.6, hips:shoulders). Despite this, I have never heard a woman complain about a guy's shoulders not matching such a ratio. When a guy's shoulders are significantly wider than his hips, it looks weird. They don't look "broad", they look top-h…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/25 08:46 PM
26

In the before pic, he looks sturdier, broader. Women who want a big strong man will be more attracted to that
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/25 08:18 PM
2

some people do possess symptoms to a degree of severity which makes it far more difficult for them to function properly I partially agree with this regarding Autism, disagree regarding ADHD. Most autistic people who talk about being 'neurodivergent' have like level 1 ASD. The level denotes that they don't need much of any support and can function normally. People at or above level 2 are going to be blatantly autistic, unable to effectively "mask" or have even relatively normal social interaction…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/25 05:21 AM
1

This is all a disorder is, it’s a grouping of thoughts or behaviors that society has deemed to be abnormal. That’s why homosexuality used to be in the DSM. If it is a spectrum, where would you draw the line? There obviously isn’t a real answer to this, the line is arbitrarily drawn at different points by each clinical and patient. The ‘neurodivergent’ label really has no utility. I think a level 1 ASD diagnosis is mostly pointless for individuals, especially adults, but can sort of see how peopl…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/25 04:44 AM
-1

Where do you draw the line though? You see the issue? It’s arbitrary.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/25 04:34 AM
–

I recognize yours as well. Still shilling these lies. It’s almost as if your career depends on it hahahaha
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/25 09:52 PM
–

Yes it is. Any adult labeling themselves "neurodivergent" should be embarrassed.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/25 09:24 PM
-3

More than 10% of the population are neurodivergent 100% of population is neurodivergent because it's a completely made up term that means absolutely nothing and is applicable to everyone.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/25 09:22 PM
-1

The "miss social cues" thing is BS to me The entire neurotypical/neurodivergent dichotomy is BS. Just forget it exists. It is made-up, useless drivel.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/25 09:19 PM
-5

Everyone is on the spectrum and has ADHD
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/25 09:10 PM
-2

There is no such thing as "neurodivergent". It's complete horseshit. The symptoms for mild developmental disorders (ADHD, level 1 ASD) are so vague that they apply to the vast majority of the population.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/25 09:08 PM
-5

I liked the girls I dated who were on SSRIs. Some of them could not orgasm, so they didn't care when I busted in 30 seconds and passed out. It's like a modern lobotomy.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/25 07:46 PM
2

It's not a simple spelling mistake, nor was it the only one you made. You're preaching the virtues of institutional education and have taken English classes for nearly a decade, yet you cannot spell.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/25 04:12 AM
3

Many states publish teacher salaries. If your home state does, look and see what some of your high school teachers are making. It will shock you. When my class discovered this back in high school, we couldn't believe it. Some of the shittiest, laziest teachers were making $85k/yr. This wasn't very recent, so $85k would be well over $100k worth of buying power today. The fact that they only work 9 months out of the year cannot be overlooked, either. Multiply their salary by 1.33 to see what they'…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/25 02:54 AM
2

intellectual persuits Did you go to college? They didn't teach you how to spell? Hysterical. There's no possible way that this was a mistake. The letters "e" and "u" aren't near each other on QWERTY keyboards. You actually thought the word "pursuit" is spelled "persuit".
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/25 02:48 AM
1

I think $71k is right in the middle, meaning you make more than roughly 50% of Americans. You also only work 9 months out of the year. There are so many easy jobs like coding or finance that pay bank! I can't speak on finance, but I am a tech lead. The coding jobs that are actually easy do not pay bank. If someone's coding job is easy, they're essentially a code monkey, and everything they do could be outsourced for $4/hr.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/25 02:45 AM
1

hey don’t have “3 months off”. They are working through that time getting ready for the next school year, they are just working from home. That is hysterical. Most teachers reuse the same materials for multiple years. All your comments are highlighting is the lack of knowledge you have for what is involved in being a teacher, their work load and your lack of knowledge of education in general. No, my comments are revealing your desire to exaggerate the difficulties of your profession and lie abou…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/25 10:21 AM
2

That is the average, many teachers are making much more. You also need to consider the fact that they get 3 months off each year, so it's comparable to $95k/yr. Regardless, $71k is still good. How could you possibly say that is a "crap salary? What planet do you live on? That can buy you a much more comfortable life than most people. adding the fact that school shootings are so common No, they really aren't that common. It's a statistical improbability, chances of this occurring are probably sim…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/25 09:56 AM
-3

So what? The vast majority of people aren't the person you're responding to with her specific health issues. What health issues make it so that someone is significantly more likely to die from complications occurring early in the pregnancy, specifically before the fetus is viable (as that make a c-section an option)? You can't murder a fetus because it's not a person. To be clear, you don't actually think it's a person either - nobody does. When pregnant women are murdered, the perpetrator is of…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/25 06:42 AM
0

Everything you described is classified under the liberal arts. Formal education is ideal for subjects with measurable outcomes, where it is beneficial to enforce structure and conformity. The liberal arts are more ambiguous... An open-ended, "loose" exploration is essential for a healthy understanding of music, literature and even history. Learning about these things in a rigid, institutionalized format will paradoxically limit your ability to achieve the knowledge and mindset you were seeking. …
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/25 06:18 AM
1

No shit. What the fuck are you even talking about?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/25 05:58 AM
–

I don't give a shit about anything you have to say.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/25 05:57 AM
1

Yes, this is correct. Institutionalized education should be reserved to specific fields, not enforced onto everyone. That's how it used to be, it just makes sense. You brought up the example of carpentry. The way the world use to work, if a boy wanted to work with wood, he might go to a local carpenter and offer to work for free in exchange for mentorship. They learned the trade, the mentor got some free labor and/or fulfillment/joy out of sharing his craft with a young person. Society as a whol…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/25 05:55 AM
1

This is ridiculous. If anything, being formally educated would limit your perspective on these subjects.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/25 05:41 AM
3

Education is not underfunded. Teachers make an insane amount of money, especially considering they get a 3 month break every year and have excellent benefits. If you're reading this and don't believe me, check to see if your state makes teacher salaries public, as many do. Look up what your high school teachers were making, it will shock you. They make bank.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/25 05:39 AM
0

Academic success is fucking meaningless.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/25 05:36 AM
0

Yeah, just money and the numerous benefits associated with being high-status lol
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/25 05:34 AM
–

Alright, first thing: vaginal birth is one (1) day out of the approx 200 days that make up a pregnancy, and I didn't say my inability to carry to term was because I wouldn't be able to deliver vaginally... The VAST majority of fatal complications either occur during or after birth. That's why c-sections have been so successful at reducing fatalities. Also, don't owe you the details of my medical history I didn't ask for them. I'm monogamously married to a sterilized man, so I already have taken …
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/25 05:06 AM
0

According to women as well.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/25 04:50 AM
-2

Right, and direct democracy is an idiotic form of government that appeals to children.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/25 04:47 AM
-3

I disagree, I don't think it was needed or logical. I don't think universal suffrage for men was needed or logical either.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/25 04:30 AM
-1

These qualities result in some men becoming high status, which makes them more desirable to more women.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/25 04:28 AM
0

Those are just gender expectations You're acting like there are top-down expectations being unnaturally enforced onto people. This is not the case. These differences and behaviors emerge naturally through human behaviors. For the life of me I will never understand why can't we socialize women to be risk takers and boys to be more caring I don't know, maybe the fact that these roles have been present in practically every human society to ever exist? Completely unrelated societies and cultures tha…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/25 04:27 AM
-7

I'm too disabled to safely carry and deliver a pregnancy Right, because c-sections don't exist. If you somehow are so disabled that you will literally die at some random point in pregnancy prior to delivery, then maybe don't have unprotected sex? Or get sterilized? Anyone who insists that women are equal/feminism is no longer necessary is either completely lacking in empathy? I don't have empathy for made-up hypothetical situations. Why would I?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/25 04:22 AM
-5

Which was needed, logical and actionable. Was it needed or logical?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/25 04:17 AM
–

Delusional
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/25 09:20 AM
–

They wear clothes? Lol
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/25 09:19 AM
0

That isn't hypocritical, genius.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/25 08:52 AM
–

I agree, especially if they are using a concealer. Obviously you will know whether or not your girlfriend is wearing 'neutral' make-up if the tiny imperfections on her face are hidden
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/25 08:49 AM
–

Everything we do to improve our appearance is done to impress and/or win the affection of other people, typically the opposite sex. You do this as well, regardless of whether or not you lie to yourself about it.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/25 08:43 AM
–

Women don't wear makeup for men It's crazy that women still say this shit and expect men to take them seriously. How is it even possible to be this deluded? You are lying to yourself. Get a grip.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/25 08:41 AM
-1

Why don’t we observe other primates writhing around in pain when they get their periods?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/25 02:13 AM
1

Gut issues are famously psychosomatic, meaning if you focus on them excessively or are in a poor psychological state, that can make the physical symptoms worse.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/25 06:06 PM
1

Because psychosomatic conditions affect women at much higher rates in general, they are simply more prone to these behaviors. For some disorders the rates are as high as 10:1 (women:men).
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/25 05:29 PM
-4

Sorry to hear bro. If I were you I'd definitely be looking into limb lengthening surgery
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/25 10:03 AM
-9

If you're under 6 foot you will never understand it. I am addicted to the rush I feel when I am the biggest guy in a room. When you are the biggest guy, women really do give you "fuck me" eyes, but I can feel them instantly turning away the second I've been out-sized by a bigger guy.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/25 09:56 AM
0

Yeah no shit, in real life if someone pulls a gun on you you fuckin do whatever they ask. You suck their dick, or you fingerblast em until they're satisfied because brother, you just lost all your human rights, ok? They own you now. You are their slave, for as long as they have a gun. A gun will kill you, it is a gun. You can't just break his gun. He'd shoot you. You should be terrified at every moment about how he could end your fuckin life. You should be on your knees, beggin him not to blow y…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/25 09:51 AM
2

A guy who has 850ng/dL is going to have a completely different experience than someone with 300ng/dL, and both are within the 'healthy' range. They'd nearly have 3x as much testosterone.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/25 07:50 AM
-7

It's just a hunch. I would assume many of the symptoms are psychosomatic.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/25 07:45 AM
1

I pee sitting down when I'm at home. Otherwise my toilet reeks of piss if I don't constantly clean it. I think when my piss hits the water it creates a fine mist that coats the surrounding areas. However, when I have women over I always leave a little piss on the seat to assert dominance. Just something I have always done. Even when I was a kid living at home I'd piss all over the seat to upset my older sisters and mom. It's definitely a power move. The women either won't realize it before they …
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/25 07:35 AM
6

What you're not considering is that there are a lot of guys with low testosterone. I'm not saying that commentor has low T, but many men do, it's not 'raging' for them.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/25 07:22 AM
-5

Women act like periods are worse than they are. I could take it no problem.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/25 07:18 AM
8

Nothing beats the feeling I get when I walk into a room and know that I can physically dominate every person in there. The first thing I do is scan the room for any other males that are over 6'4 and in shape. Usually there are none. If there is a man taller than me then I metaphorically tuck my tail between my legs and flee the room at godspeed. Some of those super tall fuckers almost look sickly in appearance though, for example I think I could easily destroy Stephen Merchant in a fight.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/25 07:15 AM
–

What? No they aren’t
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/25 04:00 AM
–

The vast majority of things people do to their appearance is to improve other people's perceptions of them. This is just a fact. The amount of women who claim this "I only do it for myself" shit makes zero sense. It's simply not true, if you genuinely believe this then you are in denial. I can walk outside in leggings with no makeup and still get hit on, and sometimes, I do. By who? Women doll themselves up to attract men of higher value. I'm sure the guys who cat-call you aren't exactly the men…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/25 02:47 AM
–

What
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/25 12:10 AM
–

Do you ever say anything of value or do you just get moody and make snide remarks like a teenage girl
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/25 11:41 PM
–

I didn't say they don't, obviously many women do. I was responding to his claim that everyone is entitled to a little piece of political power.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/25 11:36 PM
–

How is it a net negative to society? If you say pollution, carbon emissions, etc, then congrats! You have been subverted and psy-opped. How does it feel?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/25 11:35 PM
–

It's a horrible idea and wasn't included in the original vision for our country. The only people with the right to vote should be invested in seeing the long-term success of our country. I'm not sure how you could implement that, you gave some good ideas for it. The primary test should be whether or not the person voting genuinely cares about whether or not they leave our country in a better position. People with children would be more likely to support that, but then again there are tons of peo…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/25 11:29 PM
–

As it gives each person a peace of power that they are entitled to Nobody is entitled to political power. They have rights, of course, but power over others should be restricted to people who have a real stake in seeing the long-term success of our nation.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/25 11:26 PM
–

Doubt it, at minimum you apply make-up because you care about the way you appear to other people. Being attractive has benefits that aren't exclusively sexual, so you could argue that your primary motivation is to present nicely in general. However, the idea that you don't do this at all for the opposite sex is absurd. Even I, as a male, will put on clean clothes and brush my teeth before I go downstairs to grab a package. There are lots of hot gorls in my building and I don't want to be awkward…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/25 11:20 PM
1

No it's not true. You're all in denial
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/25 05:30 PM
1

You're in denial
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/25 05:30 PM
2

Well that’s hysterical, of course you do. Stop living in denial.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/25 01:50 PM
2

Yes, it is true. A 3/10 guy should date a 3/10 girl.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/25 10:27 AM
2

Nowhere in my comment did I say that they should. You made that up. What are you on head pills?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/25 09:56 AM
2

What are you even talking about? Average women should date average men
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/25 09:09 AM
3

What you're saying is completely false, dude. Guys spend on women that aren't overtly attractive even if there's no chance of a relationship. So many successful women on onlyfans are mid.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/25 08:01 AM
2

It's not "delusional" in the sense that it's unrealistic, because what she is saying is true. There are men who simp for below average women.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/25 07:58 AM
14

Women do not have to do any of these things. You exclusively do all of this shit because you're attempting to date guys that out of your league. You're attempting to deceive them with all of this shit, it'd be like me renting a Lamborghini for a date and LARPing as a multi-millionaire. The reality is that unless you are visibly deformed, there is definitely a guy who would be attracted to the "natural" you (no make-up, fancy clothes, lip fillers, botox, etc).
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/25 07:56 AM
2

Most parents don't pay for their kid's college. The government guarantees student loans for a reason. a single person can barely survive on 50k a year Hysterical, Americans really are completely clueless. None of us know what it's like to be 'barely survive' dude. $50k in the USA affords you an extremely good life compared to the vast majority of people currently alive. That's even enough to have a million dollars saved by retirement, provided you budget properly and save throughout most of your…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/25 05:36 AM
1

Yeah I bet
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/25 05:34 PM
1

Why are you lying? The entire point of insurance is to protect you when something goes severely wrong.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/25 05:28 PM
1

It's not speculation. I've had women change their minds about other major things without telling me on multiple occasions.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/25 05:27 PM
2

It is exactly the same. If you don't have health insurance, then you're trusting that nothing will happen to you. If you don't paternity test, then you're trusting your partner is being 100% honest with you. At the end of the day, the only thing that can give you total peace of mind is having health insurance and performing a paternity test.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/25 05:22 PM
1

I disagree. If it's an accusation, it's the same base accusation. Most guys are ok with it
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/25 05:19 PM
2

Uhhh no you don't? Wtf? An annual check-up costs $500-1000. That's a fraction of your yearly cost for insurance. Especially considering you must have a very good insurance plan without a large deductible if a one-time visit will be covered.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/25 05:17 PM
2

According to who
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/25 05:15 PM
–

You are just lying. I doubt your “chubby” single-mom friend is dating a tall, handsome bachelor with a good career lol. This sounds like a fantasy, I think it might your fantasy. Are you a chubby single mom? Did you write this because you feel as if you deserve an attractive and successful man?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/25 10:22 AM
3

What percentage of men have to experience paternity misattribution for you to not consider this overblown?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/25 10:07 AM
1

No
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/25 09:45 AM
-1

Did you not see me answer it?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/25 09:37 AM
-1

I'm not making anything up. Do you think people don't change their minds? lol wtf
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/25 08:05 AM
3

Did you even read what I said? The fact that it affects a minority of men is irrelevant.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/25 08:05 AM
3

How do you know this? Even if it was a ‘tiny percentage’, those men would be getting completely screwed. So something like 5% might seem small, but relatively speaking it’s significant. That would mean 5% of fathers believe in a massive, world-shattering lie for the rest of their lives, which is absolutely brutal. I mean, what are the odds that you get into a car accident tomorrow? Do you still have health insurance?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/25 06:48 AM
1

kids take an average of $350k These numbers are obviously complete horseshit. Entire families are raised at the poverty line (for a family of four that's $29,960).
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/25 05:12 AM
4

All women who get upset at the idea of paternity tests lack empathy. Yeah, and it's not like doing something merely for peace of mind is an abnormal concept. Most people understand this, including women, because they do similar things. People buy health insurance purely for peace of mind. Women get suspicious if a guy is super protective over his phone. Etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/25 05:10 AM
2

How old are you?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/25 05:06 AM
4

It provides peace of mind. Do you have health insurance? Why? There probably aren't any signs that you will end up chronically ill or maimed this year. So what's the point?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/25 05:05 AM
4

No, it's 30% of men who wanted to get a test. A significant portion of men want to get a test even if there aren't any signs that the child isn't theirs. They merely want peace of mind. That's why posts like these are made so often.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/25 05:03 AM
7

He doesn't even have to. Forced fatherhood is a thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/25 04:56 AM
6

Women will say this and then use phrases like "my work husband"
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/25 04:55 AM
4

challenge marital paternity You used the word "challenge" for a reason. There are no guarantees. If you sign the VPA you can still be forced to pay child support even if you're within that window and failed a court-ordered paternity test.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/25 04:53 AM
1

just say that shit upfront You could say this upfront, the woman could agree to it and then when it's time for the paternity test they'd still be deeply offended. You're acting like people's opinions do not change, they do.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/25 04:49 AM
–

What does this even mean?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/25 04:44 AM
-1

It’s an unspoken social contract; if you use the internet it’s inevitable. I don't care, this doesn't justify it. Apply this logic to anything else to see how silly it is. "It's an unspoken social contract, if you go outside in revealing clothing you will be catcalled"
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/25 12:09 PM
-3

I don't know what OP's motivations are, neither do you. I don't really ever see much condemnation for women over these behaviors, though. When male incels coordinate a trolling/harassment campaign against a woman, it is almost universally condemned outside of their little group. I have never heard anyone attempt to make an argument like "it's fine, they're just taking out their frustrations in a safe way". That sounds completely absurd, of course it's not healthy for them to behave that way. The…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/25 11:55 AM
–

This "peak" shit is a flawed concept. What even constitutes the "peak"? Access to meaningless, one-night stand sex outside of relationships? Everyone engaging in that behavior is automatically a loser. So what are they at the peak of? Their own destruction?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/25 11:01 AM
-4

It's the internet everyone is toxic to everyone. Men do this to women and women do it back to me. That doesn't make it healthy or sane. It's deranged and antisocial to berate and belittle people because it makes you feel good. You act like this is a normal way to "get rid of frustrations", but it's not. Maybe it is for a 10 year old bully, but these are adults. Everyone doing this needs to grow up.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/25 10:51 AM
6

They "vent their frustrations" by mocking, berating and taunting people? How is this any different from incels trolling females?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/25 10:45 AM
1

Not bad advice, but this can still occur in marriage obviously
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/25 06:39 AM
1

Bring your own condoms, pull out even with it on, and never leave your sperm unattended. I doubt the average man is going to treat their long-term girlfriend as if she is a rabid splooge stealer. This is just ridiculous, most of this advice exclusively applies to one night stands, which responsible people shouldn't be having regardless. Even if a man exclusively uses his own condoms, his girlfriend will most likely know where they are and also be alone in his bedroom at times. Are you arguing th…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/25 06:38 AM
2

How would that help this issue in any way? They can’t force a woman to get an abortion lol
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/25 01:23 AM
1

It is 10% of men. What evidence do you have indicating it's not? You haven't provided me with any, you're just making shit up. 10% is not a small minority. I thought you wanted to stick to the facts? I came to a logical conclusion based on the results of that study. Focusing on this is completely irrelevant to my overall argument though, you're using it as a distraction. 10% is already enough to justify my opinion.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/25 10:31 AM
2

Yes it does. 10% of men is widespread. Those are merely the men who are aware that it occurred as well, so the percentage of men who have experienced this must be much higher.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/25 10:20 AM
1

What incentive would there be to say that were tricked? That would make sense if they were attempting to argue that they shouldn't have to pay child support or something of that sort. They have zero incentive to lie in this study because they have nothing to gain. the few cases of genuine forced fatherhood are bad Well I disagree. The small amount of scientific evidence we have indicates it is a very widespread issue, so you're not basing your stance off of any real empirical evidence. In-fact y…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/25 10:02 AM
1

What are you even talking about? Your argument is that 10% of anonymized men in an study lied about women attempting to get pregnant without their consent? lol. What incentive would there even be to lie? This makes zero sense.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/25 09:42 AM
0

Read the first paragraph of my post. Women can sabotage birth control or coerce men into having sex, obviously.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/25 09:38 AM
2

I'm trying to actually debate the issue here. You're the one who launched personal attacks. I stated you were arguing in bad faith, in response to you arguing in bad faith. "noooo that's an ad hominem"
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/25 09:38 AM
-1

10% of a self reported study from nearly 15 years ago isn't that great either. It's literally all we have in terms of scientific literature because this issue is rarely ever acknowledged. That's the entire point of my post. Meanwhile there are dozens of studies looking at reproductive coercion affecting women. Also, how the fuck would you research this in any way other than self reporting? Are you going to implant a hidden camera in peoples' rooms to see whether or not their girlfriends are poki…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/25 08:48 AM
4

That's your opinion, and it's clearly false. If that was my goal I would've focused on the negative outcomes affecting men more in my post. Seems to me that your interpretation of my post is much more bad faith than my post is. You're incapable of debating the merits of this, because you know I am correct. So this is what you fallback to. It's just sad.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/25 08:46 AM
3

no need for legit statistics Do you have a problem with the CDC? The entire point of my post is that this is a legitimate issue that needs to be focused on more. The lack of research (outside of a single study by the CDC) supports my argument that this is an issue that is "rarely ever acknowledged". The point of this debate is to discuss the merits of whether or not this is a real issue that affects men and should be focused on more. Did you not read the title of my post? That CDC study found th…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/25 08:25 AM
3

It's whataboutism. Reproductive coercion already receives a ton of attention. If you google it there is significantly more scientific literature (including systemic reviews), hotlines/resources for women, numerous articles, etc. The title of my post is literally "Forced fatherhood is a huge problem that is rarely ever acknowledged". Whether or not reproductive coercion is also an issue is completely irrelevant when we're discussing the merits of whether or not forced fatherhood deserves more att…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/25 08:14 AM
1

Did you actually read the study? Yes. So seems like it’s not just something that women are guilty of. Men do it too! I'm aware of this, many people are. When it happens to women, it's called "reproductive coercion". It's an issue that already receives a lot of attention. What does it have to do with forced fatherhood? Absolutely nothing, you're engaging in whataboutism. When you respond to an argument with whataboutism, you're acknowledging that the argument is valid and are attempting to decrea…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/25 08:00 AM
11

No, I wasn't aware of this. I just assumed that guy was telling the truth. This is absolutely horrible. Women can statutorily rape 13 year old boys and then sue them for child support?! What in the fuck is this shit?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/25 07:44 AM
1

To be fair most of my body count comes from when I was 18-22 and sleeping with gals around my age, and young people are generally very reckless. I stopped the one-night stand shit years ago.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/25 06:48 AM
1

Women can feel that through their vagener holes? If someone touched my dick with a lubricated latex glove I don't think I'd be able to tell the difference. If it was dry latex then I'd sense it.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/25 06:43 AM
-5

I've had the opposite experience. I am very adamant about wearing condoms but have been told "you don't need to wear that if you don't want to" very frequently, even during one night stands. Most of the women I've slept with have either flat out told me I can take it off or insinuated that it's not necessary.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/25 06:40 AM
2

Agree,but you can litterallly sue her ass if she pokes holes in the condom or something similar. If you find out about it and have evidence. This is probably not the case for most men who experience this.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/25 06:33 AM
21

Is this a joke? If I secretly took my condom off during sex and intentionally came inside of a woman, would you call the woman negligent? "You should've checked to make sure his condom was on. Sounds like a whole lot of negligence to me." I doubt it. I guarantee you think stealthing is assault. You're just incapable of reversing that logic because your misandry makes you irrational. It's not okay to do things to people without their consent.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/25 06:30 AM
-18

"Assumed it was an act of God" bro we know how babies are made so ever assuming a pregnancy happening from you putting your unprotected penis is a woman who wants a kid is an "act of God" is silly. Female birth control is like 99% effective. If a man is being lied to, told "I don't know what happened! I took my birth control!", "I have an IUD!", etc and they believe it, then of course they will think that they either just got unlucky or it was fate.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/25 06:17 AM
1

First of all, I didn't claim the survey was a study. The CDC report is the only scientific literature on this at all. That's literally all there is. Yet you seem to have disregarded it. If the CDC says 10.4% of men are aware that a woman has attempted to force fatherhood onto them, doesn't that imply that it has been attempted on an even higher percentage of men?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/25 06:14 AM
6

I imagine men in the USA, on average, have higher levels of estrogen. Americans are obese, and body fat contains an enzyme that converts testosterone into estrogen. Being fat is like a light chemical castration.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/25 07:28 AM
6

Yes. I don't like blowjobs. I have never busted on a woman's face or in her mouth because I respect women so much. I would never want to do anything disrespectful to a woman. Even when I am having doggy-style sex, I avoid looking at the woman's butthole because I know they are shy about that. Sometimes I get an overwhelming urge to stare into her third-eye, but my resolve to be a true and noble gentleman always prevails. This is what it means to be a high-value man, take notes fellas. I think th…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/25 07:22 AM
–

No, women cannot force fatherhood on a man. If he isn't actively parenting a child then he isn't fathering. What? Why would you choose to focus on this definition of fatherhood that has absolutely nothing to do with what I said? Women can force fatherhood onto a man. The phenomenon is literally referred to as "forced fatherhood". They can trick them into becoming biological fathers, according to the study I just sent 10% of men will experience a woman attempting to do this to them. I feel like y…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/25 12:07 PM
–

Sure, I would agree with you up until the point where we force men to pay for children they do not want and throw them in jail if they cannot pay. If women are able to opt-out then men should be as well, especially considering women can 'force' fatherhood onto a man. Estimates suggest that around 10% of men will experience reproductive coercion. This happens when a woman attempts to get pregnant against the knowledge or will of the man. They do this by sabotaging birth control (poking holes in c…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/25 10:48 AM
–

It's how I feel.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/25 10:28 AM
–

Reproductive rights is one example. If I get a woman pregnant, she can kill my child and I can't do anything about it. If she wants to keep the child and I do not, I am still obligated to pay. I don't really have much of a choice once she's got my seed.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/25 10:20 AM
–

What if I think feminism ultimately harms the woman in my life that I love? For example, what if it encouraged my sister to focus on her career and never start a family?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/25 10:10 AM
–

I agree, at the very least they should be pretending to be feminists to get laid.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/25 10:05 AM
–

I lie and say I’m a feminist to have sex with girls who have hairy armpits. How’s that for an incentive
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/25 09:59 AM
1

Because it’s the only way to be in the child’s life? If you choose to wait for a court ordered paternity test, you can easily end up paying child support with zero visitation rights. You might not even be able to see your child, let alone be their father. Most men in this situation are hoping that the child is theirs because they would love to father their own offspring. The only men who would avoid signing the VPA are men who don’t want to be in the child’s life at all, regardless of whether or…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/25 07:52 AM
1

Wtf are you even talking about? You're just rambling about nonsense. Child support isn't owed the moment a signature is made Dude, what? Of course you are legally required to support a child the second you agree to be their father by signing the VPA form and having your name put on the birth certificate. Ideally you would support the child by remaining in their life, but if you are absent of course it will take some time for the courts to order you to pay child support. How is that even relevant…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/25 07:35 AM
1

The purpose of the fucking government isn't to save men from their partner's feelings The government imprisons men if they refuse to pay child support. Women rely on the government to ensure that the man pays up. If a man's name is on the birth certificate, he can be robbed of his freedom and bodily autonomy, even if he is not the biological father. The least the government can do is require a mandatory paternity test to avoid injustice. Wahhhhh she'll change her mind! Okay so what? You still ha…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/25 05:49 AM
1

Thus, as you've rebutted literally nothing I said at all, every word in my previous comment remains true I just explained the real reason why waiting until they get home to secretly run a DNA test on the child is not a viable strategy. I've refuted your claim that they only do this because they enjoy accusing their girlfriend/wife of being a "lying scheming duplicitous whore". Men are also free to put on their big boy pants and use their words to only date women who are okay with paternity testi…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/25 04:00 AM
1

No it’s because once your name is on the birth certificate YOU WILL PAY CHILD SUPPORT even if it is revealed that you are not the biological father
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/25 02:53 AM
1

At that point it’s too late dude. If your name is on the birth certificate IT DOES NOT MATTER if the kid is not yours. YOU WILL PAY CHILD SUPPORT
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/25 02:52 AM
1

No it’s not
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/25 02:48 AM
1

I wouldn't say it 'proves' my point, as the concept of 'proof' is dubious at best when applied to social sciences. Studies in these fields are notorious for producing inconsistent results that are not replicable due to the faults of researchers and complexity of human behaviors. I would say that it suggests that a significant percentage of people lie in therapy to avoid confronting uncomfortable truths, particularly regarding their own flaws. "Suggests" is the typical verbiage utilized to refere…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/25 11:20 PM
1

I already linked to this in another comment. What do you think "minimizing or hiding insecurities and self-doubts" is? but do you really think a good, qualified therapist isn't going to catch on to a client that constantly lies, paints themselves as a victim in all situations, and is just trying to seek attention and validation? If you read more of that article, you will see this: 73 percent of respondents reported that "the truth about their lies had never been acknowledged in therapy."
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/25 11:03 PM
2

No, it does not. I already told you that’s a different statistic entirely. Why don’t you do your own research on this topic? It is a well understood fact that a significant percentage of patients lie during therapy. Here is a good overview of the topic from the APA: https://www.apa.org/monitor/2019/05/truth-lies “More than half of the respondents (54 percent) in the first study reported minimizing their psychological distress when in therapy, pretending to feel happier and healthier than they re…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/25 10:28 PM
4

I think you missed the text before that. “72.6% reported lying about at least one therapy-related topic. Common therapy-related lies included…” The examples of lies you sent are regarding a different statistic entirely. Significantly more woman go to therapy than men. As a result, women do this more than men.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/25 08:25 PM
7

It’s not an assumption at all. 93% of people lie to their therapist.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/25 06:07 PM
2

What happens in therapy for most people is they go, lie about an experience and then receive a false form of validation that ultimately harms them because it's not based on reality. 93% of people lie to their therapist.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/25 10:18 AM
5

no good therapist would go in that direction How would the therapist have any idea what direction they are going on? One can easily lie about an experience, either intentionally or through omission, just so they can receieve the validation they crave. The vast majority of people in therapy are not being honest with their therapist: Ninety-three percent of respondents reported having lied to their therapist This idea that most people are genuinely there for genuine self-reflection is clearly fals…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/25 10:13 AM
5

I think most people go to therapy for validation.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/25 10:06 AM
4

I dont know what therapist yall are seeing but you know therapy isn’t a place you go and complain and the therapist validates your every emotion and action, right? Like, tell me you’ve never earnestly engaged with therapy without telling me. The issue with this is the fact that we are not reliable narrators when discussing our own lives and relationships. Your therapist, at best, can exclusively provide insights based on your limited perspective of an event or experience. That's only if you're b…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/25 10:05 AM
12

cuz they took personal accountability/responsibility and tried to make themselves better Lying to a therapist (intentionally or through omission) and then getting a pat on the back is not taking "personal accountability/responsibility". It's the opposite.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/25 09:57 AM
10

I don't think therapy results in genuine self-reflection most of the time. Even if you are being 100% honest with your therapist, we are all unreliable narrators. The reality is that 93% of people lie to their therapists. The vast majority of people aren't there for true "self-reflection/inner work", they are there for validation. What other motivation would there be to lie? If they are dishonest, their therapist will provide them with the validation they crave. However, it ultimately harms them…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/25 09:35 AM
3

if you can get outside and exercise, cook a healthy meal… What? How would you get to therapy if you couldn't go outside? How would you even survive if you couldn't get food?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/25 09:28 AM
0

therapy itself is taking responsibility for one’s own mental health I don't think it is. When people go to therapy, they are mentally masturbating over their "trauma". Refusing to go to therapy when it’s clearly needed is a far bigger red flag and far more indicative of an “it’s not me, it’s you” attitude. I think going to therapy is a red flag. Most psychologically-sound individuals don't dwell on their negative experiences.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/25 09:27 AM
0

You just said removal of the clitoral hood "is FGM". Then you say "in no way can FGM be compared to circumcision". Do you not see how this is inconsistent?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/25 08:14 AM
3

Women can't, because they're robbed of the organ that makes them do so Men can still orgasm without their penile glans. I'm sure there are some types of female genital mutilation that completely remove the capacity for pleasure from stimulation, but I don't think removing the clitoris would do that. Obviously it is horrible, I'm not advocating for it at all. I just don't believe this is factually correct. Some people can orgasm without touching their genitals at all, I believe one can learn how …
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/25 08:11 AM
5

I think their argument is that circumcised men need to be closer to orgasm before it starts to feel good due to the significant reduction in nerve endings. They're basically less in-tune with their sexual organs and have decreased sensations and awareness down there. So, they rush to the point where it feels good, which is near the edge of busting, and then they orgasm prematurely on accident. That's how I understood it. I could be wrong.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/25 06:16 AM
4

FGM doesn't remove the clitoral hood. The WHO classifies partial/total removal of the hood as FGM, referred to as "Type Ia". Some women have it done for cosmetic reasons, but that would be consensual. I think it makes sense to view any invasive and permanent procedure done without consent as "mutilation". Because it's not the same? It's nonconsensual genital mutilation. How is it not similar? By your logic, the orgasm gap would lean in women's favor, since FGM victims are mutilated for the purpo…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/25 06:12 AM
–

I would've done it. Send me in there with a paper bag. I'd do anything to save a life.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/25 08:34 AM
0

What health issue?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/25 08:30 AM
1

The control group is there to confirm the experience of masking for neuroatypical people. What study are you even referencing? Every single study I have seen on this has not found significant differences in "masking" between "neurotypical" and "neurodivergent" people. They just don't refer to it as "masking". Exhibit A: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8992921/ Our findings suggest that many aspects of masking are experienced across different neurotypes and are likely related to outside …
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/25 07:57 AM
2

Your brains risk assessment functions mature quite late Yes, it's exclusively in reference to specific parts of the brain, typically in relation to risk assessment. My question would be, is this due to structural changes occurring within the brain? Or is it simply people learning from their mistakes? How could scientists confidently prove either case? Because most young people are experiencing varying degrees of independence and freedom for the first time in their life, and haven't learned how t…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/25 05:36 AM
0

He even edited it
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/25 03:53 AM
5

You hit the nail on head here, but I don't even think it's a conscious decision in many cases, I think they end up stunted because of how they were treated as kids. Parents are already less likely to correct "weird" behaviors from boys, e.g. "boys will be boys". An autism diagnosis makes this even worse, now a boy's parents and teachers won't do anything about his peculiar behaviors. His own peers probably won't even poke fun of him because they're afraid of being reprimanded for "bullying", so …
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/25 03:25 AM
1

What does masking actually mean though? The term "masking" is sort of just a catch-all for stigma management and impression management. Those terms are probably better defined in the sciences of psychology and sociology. It's really not unique to autism at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/25 03:00 AM
1

Masking is basically the conscious learning and replication of social behaviour This is something that the vast majority of people do. Of course we all mimic other people and behave differently in public. Every study that has attempted to determine whether or not "masking" is actually unique to autism has come to the conclusion that it's the same as normal stigma management employed by "neurotypicals".
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/25 02:54 AM
2

The masking isn’t even necessarily a good thing, it takes a huge toll and most of us end up with anxiety from it. But it is an autistic coping skill There's really nothing abnormal about the experience of 'masking' at all. Everybody hides their urges and behaves differently in public, it's normal stigma management. All of the research I've seen on this has come to the conclusion that "neurotypicals" also "mask".
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/25 02:49 AM
10

If a girl behaves strangely as a child, the authority figures in her life will be much more likely to subtly correct her peculiar behaviors. Boys are much less likely to have "weird" behaviors corrected, the saying "boys will be boys" is common for a reason. This obviously has a negative impact on the development of males. It's much more difficult to correct those abnormal behaviors as an adult.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/25 02:46 AM
1

LARP
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/25 02:36 AM
3

bangmaid Hysterical
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/25 02:36 AM
–

I don't think the vast majority of women like it, they just do it because they think men enjoy it. If they are masochists and like it for that reason, then I wouldn't encourage it. The same applies to choking or rough sex. I'm not going to harm somebody just because they want me to. That is pathetic.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/25 07:15 AM
–

There's nothing wrong with sex positions. There's clearly something inherently wrong with forcing your cock down another person's throat. It provides them with no pleasure and is uncomfortable for them. If you find that sexually gratifying, then you get off on demeaning women. Are you a sadist? Either that or you're a brute with no higher cognition. You're literally fucking their face. To other humans, a person's visage is probably the most important aspect of their identity: When you think of a…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/25 06:34 AM
2

Interestingly, birthrate for college educated women has gone up (slightly) while uneducated women’s has gone down. There's still a massive disparity lol
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/25 05:57 AM
–

If you're into being deepthroated you have deeper issues to worry about. Particularly psychological ones
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/25 05:54 AM
–

They do. The women in my old friend group would speak of my pecker as if it were a novelty.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/25 05:52 AM
1

I have never once had a woman I was fucking ask me about my political views in any detail So you've never had a real relationship before? It's practically impossible to have a long-term relationship with someone and never discuss politics. dudes angry about not getting any pussy and political conservatism would be almost a circle Who are you even talking about? Alt-right trolls who support fascism? That's not even conservatism.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/25 09:29 AM
0

The primary purpose of a library should be to archive information in an easily accessible format. I'm not opposed to this, nor am I opposed to the public having access to services like these. You say they do "so much for their communities", how? By functioning as free daycare centers? As hangout spots for vagrants? These are abuses of the service. They prevent people from using the libraries normally. I was just at my city's library in November and don't think I will ever go back. It was absolut…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/25 08:53 AM
0

Nah fuck that
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/25 05:37 AM
1

Look at this: https://imgur.com/a/qN0Vqwt You wouldn't assume she was a guy in that photo? The only indicator is the very small amount of side boob under her armpit. She has broad shoulders and a very masculine frame. If she didn't have boobies and wasn't wearing feminine clothes and make-up, I would assume she was a guy from the front as well. I'm not even trying to be an asshole. How does that photo not look overtly masculine? Am I crazy?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/25 08:10 AM
1

I wasn't making fun of him, I meant that genuinely. I thought when he said "Cool?" he meant it sarcastically like "I obviously don't care, I like guys too".
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/25 07:56 AM
-1

Sorry, I didn't consider that you could be bisexual.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/25 11:59 AM
-1

If she didn't have breasts I would assume she was a dude
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/25 11:45 AM
1

Muscular?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/25 11:28 AM
0

I like fit/thin women, but I also like women that have a little fat, especially if it accentuates their curves. I'm talking about like a 3 - 4.5 on this scale: https://imgur.com/a/erGOSpt I don't think muscles in women are very attractive. I would prefer no muscles, but it's only a deal breaker if they're so jacked they look like a dude.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/25 11:22 AM
1

Did you even read what I said? I'm well aware of this: they succeeded at great cost of life Would you turn your brain on? Clearly their industrialization efforts weren't as fruitful as you originally implied considering they were overtly reliant on US aid and suffered significantly more casualties than the Axis due to a lack of supplies.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/25 09:08 AM
1

you know what.... he kinda did that. He made them a industrial power strong enough to fight off the Nazi reich. They used supplies from the United States to win the war dude. Stalin and Khrushchev have both stated this. Stalin said "we would lose this war [without US supplies]" at a conference. It's possible he was just attempting to rizz-up the US. Khrushchev flat out wrote "we would've lost if the US wasn't leasing us supplies" in his memoirs later on. Aid from the US absolutely played an inst…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/25 08:20 AM
2

Were they competent? You say "at least it industrialized", but at what cost? They exported absurd amounts of grain to afford resources for industrialization (e.g. machinery). This caused famines that took millions of lives. Do you think this what made them 'masculine'? Their industrial economy never even really functioned properly under the USSR, they basically just continued to keep things afloat by exporting commodities. Their economy stagnated pretty severely. Their per capita GDP was always …
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/25 11:55 PM
1

First off a government isn’t necessary for this example. We are talking about political ideologies. Did you forget that? Second your gripe seems to be with the services being voluntary vs forced. My gripe is with the collectivist 'services' being mandated and forced by the government... As that is what would make a political ideology 'collectivist'. I would argue that the voluntary nature of the service is artificial... they DO operate under a sort of social contract... So what’s the difference?…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/25 11:26 PM
1

I'm referencing the scientific literature I've seen investigate this topic: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6867614/ It makes common sense as well, the definition of conscientiousness more closely aligns with archetypal conservatives (they're not as easy-going, are more dutiful, etc).
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/25 10:34 PM
1

Do you not understand me? Let’s say you and some other dads donate time and money to build a playground for your kids. You think that is the same as a government deciding it wants to build a playground, then forcing its citizens to pay for it? The former involves individuals voluntarily working together to produce something that benefits them all. The latter is a government forcing everyone to contribute to a project it has determined to be ‘good for the collective’.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/25 12:48 PM
1

No, they aren’t doing the same thing. I just told you what the difference was. Why would you make me repeat myself? Of course you can believe in individualism and still voluntarily help your neighbors.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/25 12:31 PM
0

YMMV, but women really aren’t gonna want to get with men that don’t support their body autonomy My mileage does vary, I said that in the original post. I never hide my political views and this has never caused any issues for me. I think most women understand and can sympathize with the pro-life arguments, they simply believe their 'bodily autonomy' should take precedence over the life of their child. They only way they'd be completely unsympathetic to pro-life arguments is if they genuinely beli…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/25 12:26 PM
1

What the hell are you even talking about? A church is a voluntary community, people donate time and money to maintain it because they enjoy it. Their income isn’t being forcibly redistributed for the ‘collective good’.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/25 12:07 PM
1

You can't provide as many books to your family as the town library can. The average per capita expenditure for a library is $42/person. 'Rent-a-book' companies aren't popular outside of universities because libraries exist, but most people would probably be able to rent all the books they read in a year for the same amount they indirectly spend on their local library. It's kind of silly to use examples like these as 'pros' for collectivism, because the majority of people receive no gain from the…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/25 11:32 AM
0

You can be impoverished and 'easily take care of a family'. Poor people generally have more children. This has nothing to do with whether or not these traits are desirable to the opposite sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/25 08:02 AM
2

However, a society that looks after the overall good of its citizens makes it easier for those citizens to pursue their own well-being and that of their families. Doesn't this just support what I stated? The left-wing in the United States generally believes we should have a more collectivist society that looks after the 'overall good of its citizens' as you describe. I don't think these beliefs are more attractive for the reasons I listed in the original post: one would view or wish themselves t…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/25 06:38 AM
-1

Liberals are about taking care of other people, conservatives are about watching out for themselves. Which makes a better provider? Which is stronger, in your view? Conservatives give more to charitable causes. Also, revering authority makes you a weak little bitch... Being a liberal requires non-conformity, which requires a degree of self awareness that conservatives lack. Being anti-authority and non-conforming aren't automatically positive traits. They'd probably be negative traits in the eye…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/25 06:03 AM
0

No, I'm not confusing anything. I touch on collectivism in the third paragraph, and explain why I think leftist ideology is 'embarrassing' for a man to adopt. Keep in mind, this is from the perspective of relationships. Which of these men do you think would be more desirable to the average woman: A man who believes the good of the collective takes precedence over the good of his family A man who believes himself to be ultimately responsible for the good of his family and puts their well-being ab…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/25 05:43 AM
1

I don't think the male capacity for violence is a positive trait. I didn't say that men on the left weren't masculine, I said that conservatives generally possess more positive masculine traits (primarily conscientiousness).
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/25 05:31 AM
1

They do like to do it
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/25 06:35 PM
2

I was just able to watch it on my computer. They try to force mobile device visitors to install their MK-Ultra app. This woman has dental fluorosis hahaha, that's what those white spots on her teeth are. She was exposed to too much fluoride as a child. It's probably why her brain is fried. Her personality is even worse than I imagined. This video is just completely depraved, I hope to god it is a joke. She is overtly obnoxious, "histrionic" as you put it. The shit she says is so shallow I can't …
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/25 08:39 AM
1

Right. I'm sure it's not because you wanted to look good in the photos of it.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/25 07:09 AM
2

I'd argue that the opposite is true. If these things are of importance to you, then your marriage is less likely to last. What happens if a depression hits and you both lose your jobs? What happens if one of you becomes horribly ill and looks/smells terrible for months? When the veil of superficiality is lifted, will you stick together? Ideally, the answer to that question should be "yes". If you're concerned with shallow things like the cost of your ring, the time and place of your proposal, et…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/25 07:03 AM
1

Why would you want to look dressed up
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/25 06:53 AM
5

Because it doesn’t matter, love is not superficial
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/25 06:52 AM
1

If she loved him, she’d be trying to lock him in herself. “Oh you can take that condom off I’ve been tracking my period 😉”
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/25 06:49 AM
3

I cant watch this shitty video because I will never put this garbage app on my phone. Why would you even have tiktok installed? Do you enjoy being psy-opped? So I’m basing my opinion off of your description, the woman sounds absolutely insufferable. I would say her boyfriend dodged a bullet there, but he’s probably a short little twerp. Imagine thinking the song playing during your proposal matters. It’s all superficial bullshit, none of it is real. Where do these expectations even come from? Ro…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/25 06:45 AM
1

I like to let it marinate in my juices
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/25 06:34 AM
1

Did you even read my post? I wouldn’t let you suck my dick
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/25 06:31 AM
–

I said breeding is not a human right, not sex, but I disagree with that as well. In the situations you described, the government is just coercing vulnerable women to sexually gratify men with money. It's pretty fucked up. Do you think the mast majority of prostitutes are having sex for money because they love the profession? No, it's because they are poor, addicted to drugs, etc. If we lived in a world where destitution was resolved, how would we maintain this "sex is a human right" stance? For …
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/25 11:13 AM
–

im basically a genetic dead end? Not necessarily. There are 4 billion women on the planet, some of them would probably be willing to marry you. I don't know how short you truly are, but going to another country with shorter guys would probably help a lot. If I were you, and all of my attempts failed, I'd even consider dating disabled women. Maybe I'd intentionally fail a vision test and then start going to support groups for blind people. THAT is literal discrimination. No it's not. Breeding is …
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/25 10:47 AM
–

Its just discrimination, man. Maybe it is in the workplace? But I'm still not convinced, I'd wager guys at or above the average height are more likely to be in leading roles because their height gives them a slight confidence boost which results in them having more charisma. It's definitely not discrimination in dating. Is it discrimination if you don't want to date women with hooked noses, recessed chins or some other unattractive trait? Women objectively find taller men more attractive, there'…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/25 09:59 AM
6

You can be tall and handsome like me. Try that.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/25 09:41 AM
1

I hate this 'ND/neurodivergent' crap. What even is typical? The idea that the spectrum of human psychology can be split into 2 groups is just plain wrong.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/25 08:25 AM
3

Yeah. A lot of people like to shit on banks for causing the 2007-2008 financial crisis. The real cause of this crisis was Americans buying houses they could not afford. The American public is infantilized: "What were those banks thinking! Dangling fancy houses in the faces of adults. Of course they would overindulge and make irresponsible financial choices!' Then people have the gall to get all upset at the government for only giving banks a slap on the wrist. Do they not realize that most of th…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/25 06:37 PM
2

Did you read my post? Because I literally addressed this Hahaha wtf. No you didn't.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/25 08:48 AM
8

America is fat because many of us are childish gluttons that lack self control. This entire post is based on a false premise.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/25 08:47 AM
2

It's typically only viewed as 'divine' if the partners are in love with each-other and/or under the sanctity of marriage.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/25 10:20 PM
1

Ok
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/25 06:37 PM
2

The clingy desperate guy. No, most women dont want to be worshipped. The women who do want to be worshipped are typically abusive and manipulative. Other women find that shit off-putting, especially dealing with a guy that professes his undying love by date 1. Wrong. Women want to be worshipped. They want the guy to pay for the first date. They enjoy chivalry. They like to showered with gifts. Many expect a man to spend thousands of dollars on a wedding ring. Etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/25 09:27 AM
3

I doubt there's trauma behind her stance.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/25 09:22 AM
5

No, most men don't go for crazy sex. Most men are perfectly fine having vanilla missionary sex. They definitely go for hot though
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/25 09:21 AM
1

Not really better
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/25 09:20 AM
0

Wtf is "trauma speak"
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/25 09:19 AM
7

No. I don't fucking view my romantic partners as excitement PEZ dispensers. These women are insufferable.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/25 09:18 AM
3

Poetry is written in this manner With line breaks for emphasis and dramatic pause So we read it as if it were poetry Which makes the experience feel theatrical and significant But really it's just a bit obnoxious And rather inefficient for discussions
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/25 11:03 PM
3

Who are you even directing this argument towards? I have never heard anyone claim that sex is always a transcendent act.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/25 10:48 PM
4

I think you're just cynical. Sentimentality is part of the human experience. We find deeper meaning in natural processes because we have an innate desire to see purpose in our actions and connect with something larger than ourselves. From your perspective it may not be real, but it feels real to the people who experience it. You're arguing objectively about something that isn't objective at all, this is a fool's errand. The concept of sex being a transcendent, divine act is present in so many un…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/25 10:26 PM
4

No I didn’t. Women wanted to fuck that guy because he was a murderer. Stop lying.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/25 09:57 AM
4

No I didn't. Luigi is a spoiled rich kid who murdered a guy for attention, and it worked.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/25 09:49 AM
1

I don't think or care about it at all
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/25 09:30 AM
7

Weren't women across the USA collectively creaming themselves over a murderer just a few weeks ago? Or did I hallucinate that?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/25 09:29 AM
3

Not if it's accurate. I'd rather be honest with myself, you should try it. I am a creep.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/25 10:21 AM
-2

If did two of these am I a creep or do I get three strikes
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/25 10:19 AM
2

Autistic people just can't effectively hide their creepiness. It is endearing and honest, afterall, we're all sick little creeps. I'm a grade A creep baby!
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/25 08:30 AM
2

What you're not considering is the fact that I am a creep
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/25 08:29 AM
2

I am a creep
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/25 08:28 AM
1

It's obvious what he meant. You just misunderstood it. Further engagement is pointless You clearly realized you were wrong and don't want to admit it. Good luck with that. Glad I could help.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/25 05:38 AM
1

... our ability to use language is not a result of how we evolved??? It might not be the result of adaptive selection, there's no scientific consensus on this. There are discontinuity theories on the origin of language that suggest it might've spontaneously appeared in humans, rather than being a trait that evolved over time. It could be a spandrel, meaning a bi-product of another trait. Because there's no such thing as "meant to" in evolution... Yes, that is exactly what my point was... Why tf …
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/25 04:02 AM
1

"Because this is an evolved trait, we weren't meant to do it" is certainly a take Except it's not exactly an evolved trait. They can speak for themselves. They already did. You just didn't understand the point they were making, despite it being clear. Then when I try to explain it to you, you get passive aggressive. And thoughts are not speaking anyway, you're saying that essentially we weren't meant to have higher cognition (exactly what separates us from the rest of the animal kingdom), so ess…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/25 02:55 AM
2

They didn't say that couples weren't meant to like each-other. They said that we were never meant to 'yap at each-other, especially at length'. Language is a relatively recent advancement in our evolution. human beings being a sociable species who heavily rely on social connections for productivity and health I think they are trying to say that our intelligence completely upended social dynamics. When other species socialize, it is much more simple and direct. They also aren't as ego-driven, the…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/25 09:37 AM
9

Having friends is obviously great but it's a bit different from a romantic partner.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/25 11:25 AM
2

Keep it in your pants
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/25 09:04 PM
1

Why? I'm noticing a pattern here where people attempt to pathologize me and my opinions. I don't have 'sexual hangups' because I think blowjobs/facials are degrading.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/25 10:57 AM
1

No. My parents were hippies.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/25 10:14 AM
7

With some of my friends, yes. I don't really talk to my old roommates much at all, easily go no contact for +6 months. When bluegills are spawning (few weeks out of the year) we go fishing together and fry them up, it's sort of tradition from when we lived together. I text with my closest 2-3 friends on a daily or weekly basis, though. It's primarily over news regarding shared interests.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/25 09:01 AM
8

Male friendships are a bit different. I can go months without seeing my friends and we don't hold any animosity towards each other.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/25 06:10 AM
2

You're still taking a shit dude. That's the point. A person with self control can restrain themselves even if they aren't being observed.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/25 06:04 AM
1

Yeah it does. You don’t shit where you eat unless you are a coom-brained monkey.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/25 05:33 AM
–

Define "hold it against me". Would expecting the wife to take care of the house be an example of this? I don't see why that's a ridiculous expectation if the man is paying for 100% of everything.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/25 05:30 AM
3

Yeah, I’m not an animal. I have self control.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/25 04:07 AM
2

I don’t doubt that men constantly pressure women into rather vanilla sex. The archetypical sex pest in my mind is a wimpy, emotional dude begging to have sex. It’s just difficult for see how a considerable portion of men are pressuring women into deranged sex acts. They would have to be sexual sadists to derive pleasure from those acts, pretty extreme ones if they want it so badly that they’re willing to pressure a girl into doing it. I feel like sexual sadism is a very niche fetish, in my mind …
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/25 08:39 PM
0

You aren’t in prostitution either. You’re buying the service of sex, you don’t own the prostitute’s body. Every manual labor job in the world involves being paid to use your body. Do construction companies buy people too?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/25 07:34 PM
3

I’m an engineer, not sure if that has something to do with it. Even when I was a pizza delivery boy I didn’t really hear people talking shit.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/25 07:29 PM
-4

So are drug dealers
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/25 07:26 PM
19

I've never experienced this in my life.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/25 09:23 AM
-2

It's an apt analogy, you can't just disregard it. Men crave sex and addicts crave drugs. The sellers take advantage of them.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/25 09:19 AM
0

They're worse.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/25 09:17 AM
2

Nice fallacy
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/25 09:15 AM
1

If you've got an issue with the sex industry, take it up with the MEN who keep the industry thriving Should addicts be punished more severely than drug dealers?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/25 09:15 AM
13

the media you consume doesn’t translate into what personal desires you have This is just factually incorrect, especially in regards to sexual fantasies. those stats will be skewed because it has to be based on women who seek out porn in the first place I know, I already expressed a similar sentiment.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/25 10:07 AM
18

He's not justifying violence against women. He's arguing that women are more interested in rough sex than men. Then he provides evidence to back it up. I don't even fully agree with him, I'd think the prevalence is roughly equal. The porn statistics that show more interest from women would be skewed because less women watch porn than men.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/25 09:51 AM
22

You're making gross generalizations about how men are sadists and 'fundamentally sociopathic'. It's a fantasy you invented in your head. Get over it. I can say the same thing to you. If this is your opinion of men, then the men you screw must be completely deranged and disgusting. "That doesn’t have a damn thing to do with me and my preferences", I am not a sadist, most men are not sadists. Apparently just the ones you can get are.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/25 09:29 AM
28

This is completely false. Numerous women have asked me to lightly choke them, and every time I refuse and question their sanity. A significant percentage of women enjoy this and ask men to do it. This issue isn't exclusively perpetuated by men.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/25 09:21 AM
3

Numerous women have asked me to choke them during. Everytime I say absolutely not and then wonder if they are right in the head. That is just insane to me. I am NOT a sadist. Why the fuck would I get pleasure out of simulated violence?! I'm not deranged. Women who are otherwise completely normal have asked me to do this and/or hinted at it, e.g. they might say "I really like when I am lightly choked". How the fuck has this become so common? It's sick.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/25 09:13 AM
1

I’ve made a real argument. Also, do guys not attempt to replicate what they see in porn?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/25 07:01 PM
1

I pity you.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/25 10:02 AM
0

Because I’ve sucked a lot of dick And this makes you think you're good at it? Guys can cum from even light touch if they are very horny and/or focused. Blowjobs have clear physical limitations. If you apply too much pressure with your tongue, you will be pressing his penis into your front teeth. There's not really a way to match the pressure of a vagina or hand, not even close. I guarantee most men can feel the difference. They just like blowjobs for psychological reasons, they enjoy the degrada…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/25 10:00 AM
1

They all think they give great head. They made their mouth-breathing partners nut down their throats and take pride in it. "Oh well, honey, you've never had a good one!" Yeah, right, I'm sure the herpes-infested lips of some slob are what I'm missing. I'd rather fuck my own hand. Micro-plastics and heavy metals are present in semen. They've swallowed so much toxic splooge that it's given them an intellectual disability. "Oh honey, you just need some of my suck-suck ooo I give the best slop yaaaa…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/25 07:30 AM
1

Ok. I was wondering because I dated a girl who started taking them and lost the ability to orgasm. She would still initiate sex with me very frequently though, we had sex twice a day and were very intimate. It truly seems like she, and all of the women I dated for >6 months, got more out of sex than physical pleasure. And I definitely did, I've never bonded with anyone more than I bonded with my partners in those moments. You say watching a movie together or going feels close as well, and I agre…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/25 07:12 AM
1

Do you take antidepressants?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/25 06:08 AM
1

Disagree
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/25 05:46 AM
2

My guy, I don't think this girl-on-guy ass eating phenomenon is as common as your ex-girlfriend led you to believe. Did she convince you this was normal so she could violate your butthole? Because it's not. but she enjoyed eating my ass so that canceled it out Cancelled it out how? What the hell are you talking about
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/25 05:46 AM
0

Well 6'2 isn't really that tall.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/25 05:42 AM
–

Yeah, your sister's
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/25 05:40 AM
0

Well how would you know what blowjobs feel like for men? Or what constitutes a good blowjob? But yeah, I most likely do have sensitivity issues considering my dick was mutilated shortly after I was born.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/25 05:35 AM
1

If it was then what would be the point of sex? Respite from the loneliness of the human condition? I believe sex is physically and emotionally the closest you can be to another individual since you left your mother's womb, but there has to be intimacy involved to experience that. The physical pleasure obviously enhances the experience, and the urge to nut motivates. But I think the most significant benefits are psychological. Penetration never gave me pleasure and it’s the case for many women, m…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/25 05:31 AM
1

At the very least you implied that I am involuntarily abstinent from blowjobs. Of course if it’s not something you’re into, then that’s up to you. But have you ever heard the saying we tell toddlers about food? “Don’t yuck someone else’s yum”. The point I am making is that it is degrading. I genuinely believe that men enjoy this due to the degradative aspects of it. They might not understand this, it could be subconscious, but the root psychological desire is the degradation of women. At the ver…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/25 05:04 AM
1

I wouldn’t say eating girls out disgusts me, I just think it degrading. I like the smell of pussy quite a lot, but I want to be more than an animal that acts purely on instinct.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/25 04:50 AM
1

“You can’t have an opinion on this because you don’t suck dick” This is known as a “genetic fallacy”. I think cunnilingus is degrading as well.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/25 04:44 AM
1

“You have a different opinion than me, that must mean you’re sexually frustrated” Excellent detective work, Sherlock. Wouldn’t an incel desire blowies, or realistically any female contact? Why would I care men approve of my endeavors? I’m merely stating my beliefs and views.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/25 01:18 AM
2

I don’t even understand why there’s an expectation that your partner has to be one who makes you cum. The person most adept at making you cum is yourself, many people can masturbate in less than a minute because they know their body better than anyone else. What I’m saying is that when the guy wants to cum, he should just take on a more active role in sex and be the one directing movements. When the girl wants to cum, then she should do the same in a position where she has more control (e.g. on …
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/25 09:10 PM
3

This is exactly how I feel. Thanks brother
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/25 08:47 PM
3

It’s not bait. Maybe it’s dogshit, that’s your opinion. The concepts I discuss in my post aren’t uncommon, many societies have viewed oral sex as extremely degrading throughout history.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/25 08:40 PM
3

I don’t think it needs to be degrading, it just inherently is. There’s no way for me to overlook the symbolism of a man fucking another person’s face. I don’t understand why anyone would even want to do that to a person they love.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/25 08:36 PM
2

What the hell bro
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/25 08:04 PM
2

Yes, I think it's a bit degrading. You discuss your joy of eating out as if you are an unconscious animal. "I like to put my face in her pussy and get those juices on my face", yeah and dogs like to roll around in shit. At the very least, rubbing your face in another person's 'juices' is a degradation of your own sensibilities and intelligence as a human.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/25 08:00 PM
0

It's 'chunky' because some of it is thicker than the rest.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/25 07:55 PM
3

I’m not hung up
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/25 07:49 PM
2

“Troll harder bro”
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/25 07:48 PM
3

Seems like a cope to me. That entire show probably is. I don’t think it’s empowering to suck penis.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/25 07:47 PM
1

Nah
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/25 07:45 PM
1

Of course it’s unhygienic. I accidentally touch the interior of the toilet bowl with it on a semi-regular basis. So a lot of guys (including me) probably have poo from the toilet on their dicks.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/25 07:40 PM
1

I smell my own. Get a grip.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/25 07:38 PM
0

Why would I give a shit if my dick tastes bad
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/25 07:37 PM
0

Wrong. One of the fluids is supposed to be much thicker. You don’t have a blender in your gooch that mixes them into a homogeneous liquid. They aren’t supposed to be perfectly mixed.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/25 07:35 PM
1

Because I can smell it, obviously. Turn your brain on.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/25 07:33 PM
2

I’m not trolling. How is anything I said a troll? Is that not what a man is doing when he has sex with a woman’s mouth/face?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/25 07:08 PM
1

I definitely did play up the descriptive aspects of this post a bit, but it was to reinforce my point. It’s not bait, I believe everything I wrote.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/25 07:06 PM
0

Your cum isn’t chunky? I think it’s more abnormal for it not to be. It’s a loose mix of two fluids: one of them is thick, the other is loose and watery.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/25 07:03 PM
-1

I don’t have a foreskin. It’s warm down there. I don’t think my shaft sweats, but my balls, thighs and gooch do. So the penis marinates all day in a warm, sweaty area. It must be sour.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/25 07:01 PM
–

Did you read the last sentence? I make very good money now and none of my girlfriends have asked me to send them any.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/25 06:53 PM
1

There simply isn’t a situation where exploding on a woman’s face is ‘respectful’.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/25 06:42 PM
1

No, I do not go down on women. Eating out is degrading for men as well. It’s just a bit more degrading for women because of the penetrative aspect of it. When a guy receives oral sex he’s literally having sex with her face. He’s fucking her visage with his penis. Of course that is more degrading.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/25 06:39 PM
1

Yeah I do, eating out is degrading for men as well. It’s just a bit more degrading for women because of the penetrative aspect of it. You’re fucking their face, how is that not degrading?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/25 06:31 PM
3

Nice LARP dude. You want people to think you’ve laid with hundreds of women? Yeah, I bet. If this was true you’d have herpes so I don’t know why you’d even be proud of it.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/25 06:27 PM
1

I got it. I’m not impressed.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/25 06:26 PM
6

Are you circumcised? I wonder if we lack sensation as a result of that.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/25 06:25 PM
–

This has never happened to me before. These women were your friends? You weren't even dating them?! I had multiple girlfriends between the ages of 18-22 and I was poor. I dated a girl for an entire year and I think only bought her food once. Money wasn't a concern at all, although we were still young. Now I make very good money, yet no woman has ever asked me to give her some. Not even the women I am romantically involved with.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/25 11:23 AM
3

If you don't think your reputation matters then you're just not very smart. It especially matters today as a result of the internet. Unless you want to live as a hermit, some level of stigma management is a necessity. Does this mean you should care about what other people think of you? No, if you are true to yourself and confident that you did the right thing then you should not feel shame over the ire of others. However, it's impossible to grow as an individual if you are unwilling to acknowled…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/25 07:21 AM
2

Attempting to make small talk with strangers shouldn't be offensive, yet numerous women have secretly recorded interactions like these so they could post them on TikTok. Then the guy is lambasted and called a creep by millions of women. It's an issue because most 'normal' men feel like they are walking on eggshells around the opposite sex. We should be able to converse with strangers in a healthy society.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/25 07:02 AM
1

How many simps does she have vs. Instagram models and Only Fans girls? Porn stars? As if this is in any way comparable
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/25 09:21 AM
1

I get that, I was more-so asking if you felt violated, because you were forcibly penetrated by another person. Part of the reason why I don't think there will ever be an honest discussion about female on male sexual assault is because guys don't seem to be emotionally affected by it. You just sort of shrug it off. If your situation happened to a woman, I think most of them would be traumatized by it, and possibly even vocal about how they experienced a severe sexual assault and have 'trauma'. Fo…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/25 10:05 PM
1

Do you feel like you were violated?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/25 07:22 AM
1

If we're assuming that the approaching person is attractive, then I don't think you're correct. Even people in long-term relationships would enjoy the ego-boost of an attractive person asking them out. The answer doesn't have to be 'yes' for someone to feel good as a result the approach.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/25 10:16 AM
29

If they're attracted to a guy, he won't even have to approach. The woman will approach and often very aggressively. A girl will walk up to a guy at a bar she doesn't know and hang onto his arm or, if they are on a dance floor she will back her ass up into him and start grinding. If a guy did any of this shit it'd be assault and he'd be a danger to society, yet somehow 'normal' women can do it without a second thought. Even one of my mom's friends would occasionally get weirdly physical with me w…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/25 10:12 AM
2

You can’t control other people’s perception of you. If you feel hurt or affected by an external opinion, then you most likely lack confidence in these behaviors, even if those doubts have been repressed. If I attempted to shame you for a virtuous act (donating to charity, helping the disabled, etc), would it even affect you? No, because you’d have confidence that your actions are good. By engaging in hook-up culture, you’re perpetuating a culture that results in real societal harm: psychological…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/25 02:36 AM
2

Consensual sex and orgasm is good on the body. It's good on stress levels, blood flow, etc. Sex with somebody you actually care about and ideally love is fantastic for the body and spirit. A significant percentage of the pleasure from sex comes from connecting with someone on an almost spiritual level, that is my opinion now, I did not realize this until I experienced my first long-term relationship. It's the closest you can physically be to another human since you've left your mother's womb. If…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/25 11:52 PM
1

Most men don't push for sex early. They can't. If the guy goes on a date with someone within or above his league, he can't say "Waaa!! Gimme sex right now or it's over! Let me nut pls pls pls 😭". The woman would just say "fuck this" and leave. The man would have to be very desirable for the woman to even want to have sex with him prematurely. As a result, this is most likely perpetuated when women are going out with men who are arguably out of their league, because they will attempt to use sex a…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/25 08:15 PM
3

I think it’s bad. I was saying that stuff about how the studies on body counts probably aren’t even accurate because I agree with you and was reinforcing your points.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/25 11:22 AM
-2

There’s really no reasonable way to accurately measure how common this is. You’d have to secretly monitor the participants of a study for multiple years. People will lie on surveys if the subject matter is a source of shame. Even if the survey is anonymous, they will still lie, because they are lying to themselves. A lot of women might be in denial. Others probably don’t even know how many people they’ve actually slept with. Why would they keep track? They don’t take pride in the number like a l…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/25 11:04 AM
1

Why shame women at all for doing what men want to be able to do? Because it's not difficult for them to acquire sex. If she only sleeps with 5 guys a year she is actually very very picky Absolutely not why men want women to sleep with them quickly You've never gone on any dates with men who weren't pushing for sex ASAP? Really? The average man isn't in a position where they can demand sex and they know this. This most likely isn't even predominately perpetuated by men, it's perpetuated by women …
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/25 10:31 AM
0

It's really not uncommon
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/25 10:22 AM
1

Higher than 20 isn't uncommon at all
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/25 10:22 AM
3

Your post contains generalizations about men. This subreddit seems to be for general debate on sex and relationship issues, not 'red pill men vs women'. So you haven't experienced any of the situations you described? Then why do you care? Like I said, you basically just invented these hypothetical situations and are upset over fantasies. If you haven't personally dated men who treat you like a therapist, I don't understand why you're so confident that this is a pervasive phenomenon.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/25 01:15 PM
6

You can't say this and then say: Yes I can. 'Emotional support' for most men is simply spending time with their girlfriend. I also previously stated that I think it would be better if more men were willing to share their true feelings. I didn't contradict myself at all. You're siding with the weird men No I'm not. I'm disagreeing with you. How would know if you're not the one they expect free therapy from? Research shows that women express their emotions more frequently than men. Men restrict th…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/25 12:53 PM
6

Why would someone want to be in the presence of a guy that has serious issues he wont resolve? I have no idea why you would want to be in the presence of guys like that. That's why I said "if this is your experience, then you're probably having sex with weird men". Not when its constantly... when its years, that gets exhausting. What the fuck? Emotional support is one of the most fundamental aspects of a healthy relationship. What are the points of the relationship then?! Do you think relationsh…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/25 12:31 PM
9

they want women to fix their loneliness You can absolve someone's loneliness by merely being in their presence. That doesn't entail acting as a 'free therapist'. they want women obligated to always give emotional support, even when it's clear he needs professional help Define 'emotional support'. Both partners should obviously comfort each other and aim to make them feel understood/validated. This is a key aspect of healthy relationships. Welcome to this subreddit because you are definitely new …
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/25 12:04 PM
9

No, these guys would rather use women as a free therapist and a fleshlight If this is your experience, then you're probably having sex with weird men.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/25 11:02 AM
2

Yeah, the creation of the child using your own eggs in this situation just seems a bit deranged. You're using a random, detached man's seed to fertilize your own eggs and then having them implanted into you so you can bring a child into the world and raise them in a situation that is absolutely not ideal. If they are adopting, I think that's a bit more reasonable. However, there are always around 2 million couples waiting to adopt a baby in the United States alone. If you're bringing the baby in…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/25 10:55 AM
2

Land whales are for the lowly FOP men god damn it, not a Dapper Dan man!
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/25 08:07 AM
1

This is correct. When I was hooking up frequently, I could get sex very easily, but it was with women who were below my standards that I would not date. For every girl I've actually dated, we went on a few dates (at minimum) before copulating. Maybe we could've had sex earlier if I made a move, but I did not want to screw up my chances with them.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/25 08:03 AM
-1

Probably my hottest aunt
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/25 07:57 AM
–

All of my friends who actually own trucks for utilitarian purposes, e.g. for work, are completely disappointed with the offerings available now. There are no affordable pick-ups that can actually be used for anything significant, because these companies have been attempting to appeal to jack-asses who are buying trucks to use as everyday family cars. They all have crew cabs now, which drastically reduces the size of bed. The Ford Maverick has a fucking 4-foot bed. What the hell are you going to …
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/25 10:16 PM
–

This would be a smaller percentage of their income.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/25 10:04 PM
–

Or just one just annoys the other to hell until he/she concedes. What the fuck are you even arguing? This is literally what I said, that there are some disagreements where one partner ultimately has to concede. Try to keep up.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/25 09:59 PM
–

or ya know,just find a compromise I clearly wasn't talking about situations where a compromise is possible. You need to work on your reading comprehension skills. An example would be whether or not your child should be circumcised. Or what school they should go to. There are numerous situations where there isn't really a possible compromise.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/25 11:53 AM
–

I don't disagree with your overall sentiment, did you read what I said? I do disagree with this comment though. The idea that trucks and lawn-mowers are automatically essential is obviously incorrect. Many people spend money they don't have on 'fancier' versions of these tools.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/25 10:59 AM
–

Men do spend less money overall and save more. However, men are more likely to make large purchases, meaning they might not spend money on little trinkets but then buy a new truck, lawn mower, etc. This might even be more evidence that men are better at long-term financial planning, because the implication is that they would need to save up some money to buy a lawn mower.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/25 10:50 AM
–

On average, men save significantly more money than women do. Obviously this doesn't apply to everyone, there are plenty of women who are more responsible with money than the average man.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/25 10:46 AM
–

There will ultimately be disagreements where one person has to concede. Ideally this should probably change depending on what the decision is for and who is more qualified to make it. As an example, if I want a BLT but my wife wants to make grilled cheese, she should be the one deciding. Why? Because she is an expert at making me my sandwiches.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/25 10:43 AM
2

You're right about men using sex to boost their egos, at least young men do this. Trying to impress my male friends was absolutely a motivator for me, especially if the girl was apart of our social circle. I remember asking my friends "Do you guys think she is attractive? Should I do it?" when a girl would invite me over, and some of my friends would do the same. It makes me sick to think about it now. Unless I am an exception, I think most guys will get over this once they've actually had a sta…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/25 11:57 PM
5

I think your initial explanation is more aligned with reality in most cases. Seems like the majority of women aren't partaking in hook-up sex for fun, at least in my experience. They're using it to get closer to the men they find desirable. I'm sure they find the sex enjoyable, but even that is arguable with guys like me, there must an underlying motive. Why else would a women text me the day after I busted in 30 seconds and passed out? There's no way sex with me is enjoyable. I've never lasted …
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/25 10:28 AM
15

You say "Frrr" as if women don't go after "fuckboys" and offer them sex as way to get close to them.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/25 10:18 AM
4

Love is subjective and many men believe themselves to be in love with women they hardly even know. What matters is that you've spent so much time together that you're fully comfortable in her presence, are deeply fond of her and genuinely care about her. All of that should be true from her end as well, the feelings need to be reciprocated.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/25 10:15 AM
15

I read the post. How does this excerpt address what I said, at all? You're completely ignoring the reality that women will intentionally use sex as a way to get closer to men who aren't interested in a relationship with them. There is no expectation on woman to behave in this fashion. Most men aren't even in a position where they can enforce sexual expectations onto women. Women would only agree to this if they found the man very desirable, and the majority of women only feel that way about a sm…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/25 10:04 AM
10

But a guy with options is probably not going to stick around and wait when other women are having sex with him faster. It depends. I think most men would be fine waiting a few weeks or months if they found the woman very desirable. Women will attempt to use sex as a way to get closer to men who aren't interested in dating them, and a lot of men will oblige, but just to have sex. OP is acting like this isn't something women intentionally do, especially when they're after a guy who is arguably out…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/25 09:42 AM
35

You cant lecture women to “choose better” if you dont expect them to vet him, such as ‘withholding sex’. You're acting like women don't willingly use sex as a way to start relationships with the men they desire. That is just absurd, of course they do.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/25 09:32 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter