TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

reasonNlogic28 Archive

View 0 posts and 120 comments by reasonNlogic28 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

You confusing this: she can go back to work as soon after birth as she can with this: Telling her to go back to work the next day shows how illiterate you are.
/r/MensRights04/04/22 11:07 PM
7

Evidence?
/r/MensRights30/03/22 06:14 AM
2

She gets to do with it as she will, unfortunately. If you can convince her to share...
/r/MensRights28/03/22 04:14 PM
1

Depending on the offense, bail could be quite high. Even with a bail bondsman, you need to come up with (and forfeit) 10% of the bail amount. For a heinous crime such as rape, it could potentially be hundreds of thousands of dollars.
/r/MensRights21/03/22 11:36 PM
5

I would like to say if someone is going to cut into my brain, I'd like them to be in that position because they have an aptitude for it and a desire to do it rather than someone who had to be enticed to do it.
/r/MensRights19/03/22 08:16 PM
8

"Left" and "Right" kinda loses it's meaning, when it seems that every politician out there does what their donors want them to. That being said, the left really doesn't care about men at all. At least the right seems to be defending due process and freedom of speech. Take Title IX for instance. Obama started the kangaroo courts in college with his "Dear Colleague" letter, Trump rolled it back, and now we have Biden trying to bring it back again. If I were a "one issue" voter and that was my issu…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/03/22 08:21 PM
37

In some jurisdictions there's no set time limit, and it would be left up to the discretion of the state. Best not to co-habitate at all. At least until you are prepared to lose half your stuff...
/r/MensRights18/03/22 07:38 PM
3

The woman is an idiot. I've never heard of a doctor willing to perform the procedure before a man is much older, the earliest being someone in their mid 20's. Anyone here hear of anyone getting it done sooner?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/03/22 07:22 PM
5

Ikr? Another public service announcement that doesn't ask women to even attempt to have agency in their own protection because "women shouldn't have to", I guess. Did it seem like the guy was getting angered by the fact that the woman wasn't responding to his questions/entreaties? Kinda seemed that way to me. Regardless, I don't see this scenario ending in violence even without intervention unless the guy is a psychopath, in which case it probably wouldn't matter what the woman did/did not do.
/r/MensRights17/03/22 07:27 PM
6

From the video: "If you see this, say something" I've personally never seen this behavior, not to this degree. You know why? Because the woman said no, not interested, leave me alone. And the man did. You know who said nothing in this video? The woman. There should be a video out there telling women to make their intentions clear by speaking up for themselves.
/r/MensRights17/03/22 04:50 PM
4

https://www.economist.com/graphic-detail/2017/08/01/are-women-paid-less-than-men-for-the-same-work Here you go. If she still mentions the difference, show her this: https://www.forbes.com/sites/avivahwittenbergcox/2018/09/23/gender-paygap-uber-case-study/?sh=3f33830b555b
/r/MensRights17/03/22 04:30 AM
23

Damn, and he wrote this in 2006. Think how much worse it is today. Male characters are not only being portrayed as evil, incompetent buffoons more frequently but are also getting beat regularly in physical confrontations in movies and tv shows by their smarter, more competent, "better in every way" female protagonists. And if they aren't getting beaten regularly, they are simply being replaced by same.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/03/22 04:42 PM
9

Make sure you get a paternity test. You've got to be able to prove you are the father before you have a say in the child's well-being. As the father, you can prevent your son's circumcision.
/r/MensRights13/03/22 01:00 AM
7

We'll just have to agree to disagree. I would rather stay home with the kids, and you would rather work. Too bad I didn't meet someone like you back then.
/r/MensRights10/03/22 11:11 PM
7

Dude, you literally called caring for a newborn an enriching vacation and then proceeded to outline all the ways it’s difficult. "Getting to know your child, seeing them become more aware, and watching them learn and find their personality is a wonderful thing to behold." Did you not read this part? "If you love your child, it's not a chore." Or this part? "Comparing having to go to work, deal with people, the commute, the overtime, the unscheduled calls, etc., to getting to stay at home with yo…
/r/MensRights10/03/22 10:51 PM
12

Caring for a newborn is not an enriching vacation. The benefits you speak of are non-existent. The first year is a brain dead grind. All I can say to this is, my experience was much different than yours. I fell in love with my daughter the moment she was born. She took her first nap on my chest on a couch in the delivery room. I did more than my share of taking care of her when I was home from work and would have gladly changed places with my wife if I could have, and in hindsight I wouldn't hav…
/r/MensRights10/03/22 09:31 PM
13

This is simple. The man should say no. If the woman doesn't want to lose money, she can go back to work as soon after birth as she can, and the child can be put in daycare, which would be cheaper than $50k/6 months. Or he can stay at home with the child, and she can pay him for his "lost earnings". See how she likes that deal if she is the one who has to work. It's ridiculous, in my mind, to expect to be compensated for caring for your own child at the same rate as a highly-paid job. This woman …
/r/MensRights10/03/22 07:32 PM
18

Oh Sheryl, showing off your ignorance of history again. You should stick to what you know, not what you "believe".
/r/MensRights09/03/22 09:49 PM
6

Which means this article makes even less sense. If it's about fame and monetary determinations, what does the race or sex of the recipients have to do with it?
/r/MensRights09/03/22 04:46 AM
42

Isn't Australia over 80% white? Filling only one position with a POC would have been sufficient, but where is the proof that they passed a worthy POC up? And it's only 6 positions so far, a minuscule sample size. If you want to fill positions based on equity vs. merit, we may as well just pull names out of a hat.
/r/MensRights09/03/22 12:28 AM
31

https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2019/06/12/fathers-day-facts/ft_18-05-01_fathersday_time/ On average, men not only spend more time at work, they also spend more time taking care of their family overall when work, housework, and childcare are added together according to the Pew Research Center.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/02/22 02:57 PM
28

Yeah, pretty much. Can't tell you how many dating bios I see of women talking about how successful they are and how much money they make. Ladies, guys don't care how much a woman makes, you care about how much a man makes.
/r/MensRights27/02/22 11:30 PM
30

https://ifstudies.org/blog/number-9-in-2021-the-ideal-husband-a-man-possession-of-a-good-income Here you go.
/r/MensRights27/02/22 10:49 PM
6

That's what I'm saying, any imbalance is a potential indication of inequality, in either direction. It could be, and in this case, women arguably have it better. Overall, they work fewer hours for the family, and they do it in the comfort of their own home. This article would make one think it goes the other way. ​ You saying that women should have made their choices better is patronizing and unhelpful in that context. Again, never said that. Holding grown adults accountable for their own decisi…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/02/22 01:40 AM
5

Also blaming women for the imbalance is odd and counterproductive. "They like it that way!" Right... Never said that. I said they chose it willingly, or didn't do enough research on their partner and now have to live with it. And men could rightfully complain about the imbalance the other way. Whose assumption is that? Not mine. Not relevant for pointing out a continuing gender imbalance. It is relevant. Pushing a button on a dishwasher or washing machine, doing a bit of vacuuming, and cooking a…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/02/22 06:37 PM
4

You know what the best time to figure out if your partner is willing and able to do more of the housework, if that's important to you? BEFORE you marry them or have kids with them. If women are complaining that men they chose to marry and have kids with don't do enough housework, that's on them. And I love the assumption that taking care of a house and children is so difficult compared to most jobs out there, and especially the jobs that are mostly filled by men. I also love the assumption that …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/02/22 06:06 PM
6

https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2019/06/12/fathers-day-facts/ft_18-05-01_fathersday_time/ Here you go.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/02/22 05:36 PM
31

https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2019/06/12/fathers-day-facts/ft_18-05-01_fathersday_time/ Father's spend more time taking care of their families, on average, when work, housework, and childcare are are taken into account. According to this study, they have for over 50 years. This focus on one aspect where women have a greater share of the load is a red herring.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/02/22 12:46 PM
3

Is this article a joke? I couldn't find anything in it to suggest it was. I can only imagine the confused look on the face of any guy if she told him that was why she broke up with him, and then the look of relief as he realizes he just dodged a bullet.
/r/MensRights21/02/22 02:10 AM
5

Nobody seems to care that this woman is potentially dangerous and her behaviour is getting worse and worse. I agree entirely. One only needs to see how often men are punished for abusive behavior compared to how rarely women see any consequences for their abusive behavior, even though the law is supposed to be applied equally, to see the fix is in.
/r/MensRights17/02/22 05:24 PM
8

I'm not sure what this has to do with men's rights, unless it's to show doubters that women can be shitty and abusive in relationships, too. That being said, why do so many women use that old chestnut: "In the X number of years we've been together, you never satisfied me in bed!"? I mean, I understand they are just throwing out the worst thing they can think to say to hurt feelings, but wtf? You were with a guy for years and you never told him what you like, what you would like him to do, what y…
/r/MensRights17/02/22 04:25 PM
1

No, it means the third time they break the law, no matter what the offense is, they will be sentenced, depending on the state, to penalties such as a prison term twice as long as the crime suggests, to 20 years to life in prison. It's a standardization of sentencing and it takes away from the details of the crime that may have a mitigating factor to the judiciary. Edit: They will still serve time (most likely) for the first two offenses.
/r/MensRights17/02/22 12:04 AM
1

The United States. Of course, in my country we've privatized many prisons and prison corporations lobby our elected officials to pass legislation such as minimum mandatory sentencing and 'three strikes' laws. This means that on the other end of the spectrum, say a minimal breaking of the law with no harm done a judge must hand out a minimum sentence even if he/she might have let the offender go with probation or a warning. It goes both ways.
/r/MensRights16/02/22 11:53 PM
11

Just watched her on Triggernometry. While I can appreciate some of her takes, she still uses terms like "patriarchy" unironically and tends to only see things from the viewpoint of how it affects women and ignoring the affect on men. Still, better some advocacy than no advocacy at all.
/r/MensRights16/02/22 11:44 PM
181

Just watched her on Triggernometry. While I can appreciate some of her takes, she still uses terms like "patriarchy" unironically and tends to only see things from the viewpoint of how it affects women and ignoring the affect on men. Still, better some advocacy than no advocacy at all.
/r/MensRights16/02/22 11:44 PM
7

I agree with you that rape is hard to prove, one reason being there aren't usually any witnesses to the act and it becomes a he said/she said situation. I disagree with you that prison terms for rape are low. Rape sentences are second only to murder in terms of length of sentence. http://edr.state.fl.us/Content/resource-demand/criminal-justice/reports/criminal-justice/cj25.pdf
/r/MensRights16/02/22 11:37 PM
24

Men make lots of money transfer it to women via divorce alimony child support or strippers Or strippers? Look, I agree with everything else you said, but there are no laws out there saying you have to give money to strippers unless you marry one.
/r/MensRights16/02/22 05:49 AM
3

And to add to this, electricians and mechanics spend years learning their trade. You don't pay more for a mechanic to fix something in half an hour, you pay for their training and experience.
/r/MensRights16/02/22 04:44 AM
7

Overall, fathers put in more time for the family, when work, housework, and childcare are added together and they have for the last 50+ years. https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2019/06/12/fathers-day-facts/ft\_18-05-01\_fathersday\_time/
/r/MensRights15/02/22 11:16 PM
5

Feelings over facts.
/r/MensRights15/02/22 01:55 PM
7

I hate to say it, but unless you left something out of your story that could help your situation you are going to be paying child support for that child. This is all hindsight, I know, but you should have worn protection. Regardless of that, signing an acknowledgement of paternity without verifying the child is yours through DNA testing was really your undoing. Get a DNA test ASAP and talk to a lawyer, but I don't think that will save you now, even if you are proven to not be the biological fath…
/r/MensRights15/02/22 12:17 AM
6

Ikr? "I'm going to spend more on food than men because I will live longer, on average. What a bummer."
/r/MensRights14/02/22 09:17 PM
28

What a misleading title. Single PEOPLE do worse economically than people who can share the costs of living. Men aren't doing any better, regardless of how the author wants to make you think that from the title. Fuck, I hate articles like this, that make it seem like women's choices aren't choices. "Women have a larger circle of friends and family than men typically and might spend more hanging out with them". Uh, budget your spending better, ladies? You are aware that you don't have to spend mon…
/r/MensRights14/02/22 03:30 PM
7

Huge stink. I see what you did there.
/r/MensRights14/02/22 12:15 PM
3

Yeah, that kinda follows with the whole idea that women are offended when approached or talked to...by men they find unattractive or not on their assumed level. If they do find you attractive and/or obviously a man of means, it's not harassment.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/02/22 12:09 PM
5

If you ever had a DUI you wouldn't say that.
/r/MensRights14/02/22 03:45 AM
3

Well, you know what they say: there's no such thing as bad press. But yeah, probably not. More than likely they get more attention than they want. If I ever became famous I would also become a hermit.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/02/22 04:12 AM
112

Women are just as likely as men to win elected positions. https://www.axios.com/women-are-as-likely-to-win-elections-as-men-but-fewer-want-to-run-1513302928-db047e5e-089f-41a4-bae8-de0a07537e00.html Edit: In the U.S.
/r/MensRights13/02/22 02:21 AM
17

Well, sure. You can't go around threatening harm to people and that doesn't fall under 1st amendment rights. That's one of those things that aren't explained or expounded on. What constitutes street harassment? A wolf-whistle? Saying "looking good" while a woman walks by? Where is the line drawn?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/02/22 01:13 AM
30

In the UK, they have passed laws in some areas that prohibit street harassment, or catcalling. Recently in London, they did have undercover female police walk around and they did hand out tickets for street harassment. If they tried to pass laws of this nature in America, they would be sued for going against the 1st Amendment.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/02/22 11:47 PM
3

Essentially, I could agree with everything you said. Did BE even need to say something? No. Did she need to say it the way she said it? No. Did she say it in a way that allowed her plausible deniability? Yes. Personally, I ignore things said in this way. If someone has a problem with me they are going to have to be clear about it because I'm not good at hints, in any case. Should YE have asked for clarification? Yes. And further, if he did ask for clarification he should ask BE personally, not t…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/02/22 11:28 PM
39

This just sounds like Buzzfeed stirring the pot. "Black Performer Disagrees With Two Different White Performers 12 Years Apart. Why Does He Hate Women So?" Seriously tho, I didn't see it mentioned that BE mentioned TS by name, so YE bringing it up is kinda dumb, on his part. IMO, of course.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/02/22 08:28 PM
3

Whenever I hear "We need more of Group X in Job Y", my first response is to ask why? Would Group X be better in Job Y or add some value to Job Y that Job Y needs? Is Group X being kept from Job Y? Are eligible candidates from Group X not being hired at the same rates as other groups? If any of these answers are yes, then there might be some value in hiring more of Group X in Job Y but until that's proven there's no need to have more of Group X in Job Y. Did I make sense there?
/r/MensRights11/02/22 01:54 AM
1

Sure thing, man. Been there, done that. The fact that men have no say or options once a woman is pregnant should be taught to boys in school. Maybe teach the boys the local child support laws in Home Economics while they are at it. I know I could have used that information.
/r/MensRights10/02/22 04:57 AM
1

That...really sucks, man. Before assuming the worst, do some research. What are the child support laws in Mexico? Try to get an idea of what you may have to pay based on your current income and save that amount of money (if possible) regardless of what you plan on doing. You will then know what you have to pay, and if you go the no-contact route you will have the funds available to rectify it if you change your mind down the road and decide to come clean, or child services finds you. You could s…
/r/MensRights10/02/22 04:29 AM
64

It's genital mutilation.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/02/22 11:38 PM
30

Welcome to the club, lady. You've just experienced what every man has to face if he wants any chance of dating/sex. You forgot to approach people you might be interested in, though. Reminds me of that Simpsons bit: "We've tried nothing, and it isn't working!" But hey, she's a semi-attractive woman and I'm sure she was expecting to be approached and got sad when it didn't happen that night. News at 11.
/r/MensRights04/02/22 03:16 AM
19

Indeed. Everyone has a shit sandwich to eat, man or woman.
/r/MensRights22/01/22 04:51 AM
20

Wasn't Dakota Johnson in the 50 Shades trilogy? The one about a handsome billionaire that fulfills BDSM fantasies of her character and his? Wasn't this about objectification of both characters for their looks (and him for his money, as well)? I've only heard about the books secondhand so someone tell me if I'm wrong but seriously, if you are in a movie where sex is a major part of it you might be filmed in a sexy way and that's the purpose of the filming. Duh? I mean, this film she's in is has a…
/r/MensRights08/01/22 01:00 AM
2

Are mouth swab DNA tests different than blood DNA tests? According to Google, saliva has the same amount of DNA in it, but is more easily contaminated than blood. So for something as important as determining paternity that's probably why they draw blood.
/r/MensRights02/01/22 12:18 AM
1

https://www.healthline.com/health/pregnancy/paternity-testing-while-pregnant#Why-is-it-important-to-take-a-paternity-test-during-pregnancy?-
/r/MensRights01/01/22 09:09 PM
5

There are noninvasive paternity tests out there now. https://www.healthline.com/health/pregnancy/paternity-testing-while-pregnant#Why-is-it-important-to-take-a-paternity-test-during-pregnancy?-
/r/MensRights01/01/22 09:08 PM
2

Are you saying drawing a small portion of blood from a pregnant woman for a DNA test may cause her to have a miscarriage? Or did I miss something here?
/r/MensRights01/01/22 05:57 PM
3

I think first dates should be dutch no matter who asks.
/r/MensRights30/12/21 07:56 PM
8

Shocking. I feel what should be done is make signing up for the draft, for both men and women, come with a benefit instead of men losing the right to vote and being eligible for fines and imprisonment if they don't sign up for the draft. Maybe make those (men and women) who sign up for the draft eligible for the GI Bill (or an equivalent program) and a VA loan.
/r/MensRights07/12/21 12:05 AM
7

They're reversible with 95%+ success within 10 years. That's on the high end. The low end for pregnancy after a vasectomy reversal is 30%. With those odds I'd freeze some sperm before I went through with it.
/r/MensRights06/12/21 01:34 AM
29

Do you have a source for that? This article makes it sound like it's only harassment against women that's going to be made illegal.
/r/MensRights04/12/21 07:07 PM
37

Does anyone here want to harass men on the street? Well, you can because this law doesn't hold women accountable for the same behavior, and men won't get the same legal protection from street harassment that women do.
/r/MensRights04/12/21 06:51 PM
17

Don't know about the UK, but here in the US any prior false rape accusations made by a woman can't be brought up in current rape cases as it's considered part of her "sexual past".
/r/MensRights03/12/21 12:31 AM
1

Because like others here, I don't see it in day-to-day life. I don't oppress women, or men, for that matter. I don't want to go down some rabbit-hole of trying to prove a negative as that's essentially impossible. The onus is on you to prove your position. Give me your best single piece of evidence that men oppress women.
/r/MensRights02/12/21 04:28 PM
6

Feminists believe that men, by their nature, use violence to oppress women and have for thousands of years. How is this not sexist?
/r/MensRights30/11/21 10:16 PM
31

The feminism sub. Any ideological group that believes an entire group is oppressive and violent to another group based on the two groups sexes is the most sexist by definition.
/r/MensRights30/11/21 01:24 PM
9

https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/talking-about-trauma/201902/when-male-rape-victims-are-accountable-child-support Yes, the women kept the children and yes the children had to pay child support.
/r/MensRights28/11/21 05:52 AM
23

Yep. They basically said "well, that's not what we wrote the algorithm for!" Reddit is much the same. They only forbid saying hateful things about "marginalized groups". I'ma go out on a limb and assume that doesn't include whites and men.
/r/MensRights27/11/21 04:58 AM
84

I, for one, am shocked! Shocked, I say!
/r/MensRights27/11/21 01:49 AM
1

Thanks. I'll give it a listen sometime.
/r/MensRights26/11/21 02:27 AM
1

Can you give us a synopsis?
/r/MensRights25/11/21 05:46 PM
1

Why should I believe any of this? No link to the study attached. This could be the same as the "1 in 5" study from years ago that called things sexual harassment even if the person asked the question in the study disagreed. Evidence or STFU.
/r/MensRights25/11/21 03:37 AM
30

I know one man who needs to shut up now.
/r/MensRights25/11/21 02:19 AM
23

I'm sure he tried pointing out the misandry over at the feminism sub and immediately got permabanned. He's got nowhere else to go.
/r/MensRights24/11/21 09:23 PM
55

The age of consent is 16 in the UK, so it sounds like they can only get her for, as the article states: Four charges relate to sexual activity with a girl aged between 13 to 17 and abusing her position of trust, with the fifth charge being sexual activity in the presence of a teenager.
/r/MensRights24/11/21 09:01 PM
2

Maybe so, but why is this coming out now after his death instead of at the time of the offense? I question the motive. I don't think she can get money out of his family for this and you can't send him to jail or hurt him in any way so...? Some sort of closure, maybe? Calling out her traffickers?
/r/MensRights24/11/21 08:57 PM
8

Paternity tests are not standard, they must be requested.
/r/MensRights24/11/21 12:05 PM
5

The morality of consent doesn't change over state lines. But the legality does. Morality has very little to do with the law, as the boys who were statutorily raped found out when they had to pay child support for the children produced from their illegal coupling. Morality? GTFO.
/r/MensRights24/11/21 12:17 AM
6

If it's in a state or country where the age of consent is 16 then yes it's legally okay.
/r/MensRights23/11/21 11:31 PM
3

http://www.papa-help.ch/downloads/Steinmetz_The_Battered_Husband_Syndrome.pdf This is the first link and works for me. Maybe something to do with your browser or security settings. Can't do much more for you.
/r/MensRights23/11/21 09:24 PM
8

https://www.reddit.com/r/mensrightslinks/comments/52i3cc/dvipvstudysuzanne_steinmetz_the_battered_husband/ This help?
/r/MensRights23/11/21 08:40 PM
8

Are you referring to the Suzanne Steinmetz Battered Husband Syndrome article?
/r/MensRights23/11/21 08:07 PM
10

Unless it shows her saying "No" clearly and then him forcing sex on her it won't prove anything. She's already stated they had a consensual relationship except for a couple times when she claims he forced himself on her. The fact that she waited 21 years until the man was dead instead of making the claim at the time makes me doubt her sincerity.
/r/MensRights23/11/21 05:28 PM
26

Age of consent in Cuba is 16. Ain't saying it's right, but it's legal.
/r/MensRights23/11/21 05:46 AM
32

Jeez, waiting til he's dead and can't defend himself is a dick move. Makes it hard to believe what she claims is true.
/r/MensRights23/11/21 03:27 AM
9

True. Nice Red Dwarf reference, btw.
/r/MensRights22/11/21 08:15 PM
27

Then you risk getting sued for it, like that barber did when he tried to get out of cutting a girls' hair because he wasn't familiar with women's hairstyles and wasn't comfortable cutting her hair. https://www.newsweek.com/barber-who-refused-cut-girls-hair-accused-discrimination-876823
/r/MensRights22/11/21 07:34 PM
5

No. Once I could afford to have my own place I realized I would never have another roommate again, if I could do anything about it. So far, so good. I'd probably live in my car before having a roommate again.
/r/MensRights22/11/21 01:13 AM
13

What did we expect from Arwa Mahdawi and The Guardian? Thoughful, reasonable arguments? China and its leaders will suppress any information that makes them look bad on the world theater. Whether true or not, Peng Shuai's accusation was going to have the response we've seen, as everyone critical of Jinping and China has had poor outcomes from their actions. It doesn't matter that it's a woman accusing an ex-premier of sexual misconduct, she could have accused him of being a drug dealer and the sa…
/r/MensRights21/11/21 09:05 PM
2

Good article. Thanks for posting.
/r/MensRights21/11/21 07:00 AM
16

she was not in the upper echelon of attractiveness either. There are some thirsty guys out there. I am constantly astounded by the level of attention unattractive (in my opinion) women get from men.
/r/MensRights19/11/21 06:40 PM
13

Have you got a link to a study or something? I'm interested in reading it.
/r/MensRights19/11/21 06:35 PM
2

Yeah, that would be rough. Not sure why bathroom attendants are needed, anyway.
/r/MensRights19/11/21 02:46 AM
16

Apparently the Italians have less modesty when it comes to bathroom etiquette? Spitballing here.
/r/MensRights18/11/21 10:13 PM
3

Claims to be a bisexual man, in his posts. Gatekeeping white knights come in all varieties.
/r/MensRights18/11/21 09:16 PM
8

Look back at the years and years women have been objectified, raped, dehumanized and so on and basically treated like dogs. GTFO of here with your "but women have historically had it worse than men!" bullshit. Everyone's got a shit sandwich to eat in this world, just because women's is on pumpernickel instead of rye don't make one bit of difference. I personally don't care either way about this movie but you know as well as anyone here that if a movie like that were made with the genders reverse…
/r/MensRights18/11/21 04:55 PM
7

https://i.imgur.com/FfXgkcP.png And here's the graph showing men's rates have dropped more over the last 30 years. This was in the very post that you linked to, that YOU posted a couple of months ago in politicaldiscussion. Do you not even read replies to your own posts, or do you ignore them when they don't fit your narrative? As far as your "state of the world" arguments, most dealing with how women are underrepresented in government and STEM, here are my followup questions: In government posi…
/r/MensRights16/11/21 05:46 PM
3

I say stay away. At best nothing will happen and you will have a couple of DnD partners. At worst, the office women are right and you will find yourself being extorted/taken advantage of. There's also the possibility of pissing off the office women if you do start hanging out with this woman and her bf. It could be that this woman shared something with the office women that makes them feel like they should warn you off, and they just won't say what it is so as not to break the sis code. Seriousl…
/r/MensRights11/11/21 04:54 PM
7

I wouldn't call Google the most neutral of search engines.
/r/MensRights08/11/21 07:02 PM
39

Damn, that's nice to see. At least wikipedia isn't totally eaten up with woke ideology.
/r/MensRights21/10/21 08:01 PM
17

This woman is truly dumb or so ideologically driven she is willingly ignoring the obvious. Unless you castrated ALL men on the planet, unplanned pregnancies will still happen. It takes two to tango as they say, so why is she putting all the responsibility on men? ​ then when it's time, to have the man decide he's ready to begin a family ... ONLY the man decides when to have kids? When women have so many options for birth control compared to men, if they happen to get pregnant, they can get an ab…
/r/MensRights20/10/21 06:13 PM
106

It's a dumb statement, sure. It is making the assumption that only (or mostly) men are against abortion, when that is hardly the case. It's pretty much 50/50 men and women being against abortion. In fact, I think in TX it was a slight majority of women being pro-life.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/10/21 01:59 AM
2

Glad to hear that not all cops ignore abuse when women are the abuser, it gives me hope.
/r/MensRights18/10/21 05:09 PM
11

There is a difference between being something and acting like something. The first is an inherent characteristic and the other is a choice. Saying you're an idiot is different than saying you're acting like one.
/r/MensRights18/10/21 05:00 PM
14

Good god damn your argument is awful. Toxic masculinity isnt saying that masculinity is the CAUSE of their toxicity. Then it's not toxic masculinity, it's toxic behavior common to people, not just men. That's what the people responding to you are trying to tell you. That's also why people on this sub have such a problem with feminism because feminism refuses to acknowledge or address it. Locker room talk? Women do that shit, too. I can only speak anecdotally, but I would bet a paycheck that any …
/r/MensRights16/10/21 03:13 PM
2

Found it hard to get past the man marrying the woman with whom he cheated on his second wife, though I would have expected her to cheat on him rather than kill him.
/r/MensRights12/10/21 07:33 PM
3

Indeed. They also want to ignore how women's choices affect their outcomes, as if they have no agency or responsibility. It's pretty simple, having a child will affect how much time you have to devote to getting ahead in your career unless you have a partner willing to take on the majority of childcare, or the funds to afford to pay for childcare. Women, if your career is important to you and you don't have a partner who wants to take care of a child, or you don't have the funds to afford childc…
/r/MensRights10/10/21 05:16 PM
7

Margin of error, maybe.
/r/MensRights10/10/21 02:38 PM
16

From the article: more than 73 million women (aged 16-plus) participate in the American workforce, and every single one of them has been effected by workplace financial discrimination in some form. Whether they were denied a raise or promotion, found out they were making less money than their male coworkers, or consistently penalized for trying to maintain work-family balance, every woman knows the experience of working just as hard to achieve less. Not even close to every man is in that kind of…
/r/MensRights10/10/21 12:24 AM
20

To use your 'woman eating a salad' example, it's bad faith to assume that the woman is choosing a salad because she is wanting to be skinny and attractive to men because society says she should. It's entirely possible she is just a healthy person. She might have been told by her doctor that her cholesterol is high. Without knowing the reason(s) why the woman is choosing a salad it's bad faith to assume it's because misogyny. You know, this also fits into the easy out category. Men don't find you…
/r/MensRights09/10/21 10:29 PM
37

IMO, that's because of three things. One, misogyny as a term is so overused it has been hijacked to mean almost anything that goes against women. Two, there are so many bad-faith actors out there willing to assume the worst in any interactions concerning women. Three, it's an easy out: Didn't get that job? Misogyny. Raise or promotion not what you expected? Misogyny...etc.,etc.
/r/MensRights09/10/21 09:48 PM
16

Any woman who will withhold sex to try to manipulate a man's behavior or viewpoint is no woman worth being with. How many women are with men who disagree with them on this issue anyway? I really see this affecting men who already agree with their women and will have very little emphasis overall.
/r/MensRights08/09/21 02:16 AM
14

I think you first need to find out if the women were even asked if they wanted to come back to the office. If they weren't, your company could be opening themselves up to a sex discrimination lawsuit. Even if they were asked and they all said no, you might want to bring up how it would look from the outside, especially if any of the women changed their minds. You might approach it from that angle, that in the interests of the company, the best option might be to swap some of the boys out for the…
/r/MensRights05/09/21 10:49 PM
32

There are women out there who have achieved orgasm while being raped, so involuntary response to sexual stimuli is not just something men have. This is obviously written by someone who is ignorant of this reaction in men and women or who just chose to ignore it because it didn't fit their narrative.
/r/MensRights15/08/21 06:20 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter