TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

reasondefies Archive

View 0 posts and 81 comments by reasondefies on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
-1

And yet, as has been clearly and exhaustively explored in this thread, men and women both face very similar pressures from society and the opposite sex, and respond in similar ways, so there is no gap. Or have you people really become so delusional as to think that there is no pressure on women in our society to work at being attractive to men? But you know what? I give up. This sub once had a tendency to make some good points despite being guilty of many of the same types of biases that modern …
/r/MensRights27/04/14 07:01 PM
0

She is absolutely being a terrible and unpleasant person. That just has absolutely no relevance to the sort of broad societal issues and injustices which this forum pretends to be about.
/r/MensRights27/04/14 04:22 PM
0

Would anyone expect fat women to change their behavior as a result? Or would they instead say, "Wow, this guy is a colossal asshole and I have no desire to accommodate his sexual interests"? Most fat women reading it would probably feel at least a little bit bad about themselves, and probably would not change anything meaningful as a result. All part of human nature. And so what? Men certainly say and write hurtful things about fat women, or suggest in person or online that someone should start …
/r/MensRights27/04/14 05:25 AM
-3

Well, the majority of the people voting on it in this thread care. Including you, since you went out of your way to complain about it. The thing is, this is not an example of sexism, and isn't relevant to anything which all of you here claim to advocate for. This girl finds traditional hypermasculinity attractive, and is rude about expressing that - so what? If a man says that he isn't interested in fat women, it may well make him a jerk, but not a sexist - something the population here would be…
/r/MensRights27/04/14 02:40 AM
0

So in other words, OP's poster is incredibly misleading.
/r/MensRights31/03/14 10:56 PM
5

If you think it is ok to hit someone because your girlfriend is flirting with them, you are fucked in the head.
/r/MensRights22/02/14 04:09 PM
2

...this whole post is about an anecdote. Why aren't you holding OP to the same standard you are using on this commentor, who replied citing a different anecdote which supports a different point? This sub has a serious problem with crying 'that doesn't count, it's anecdotal!' when a story comes out which demonstrates unfairness against women, and heavily publicizing the same sort of story when it focuses on injustices against men.
/r/MensRights15/01/14 04:16 PM
2

The debt may well be allocated by a judge in an unfavorable way in the event of a divorce, and then OP would have to face the potential consequences of not complying with a court order if he didn't pay, but any activity on the card itself would not at any point touch his credit score if he were not on the actual credit card account.
/r/MensRights02/01/14 05:47 PM
3

The wife can get her own cards, and as a married couple he is subject to any charges on those cards This is only true in community property states, which California is not.
/r/MensRights02/01/14 04:04 PM
-1

...ugh.
/r/MensRights09/11/13 05:08 PM
6

For one, I did not attack anyone, you are referring to someone else. For two, just look at the other comments in this thread by that user - clearly abusive and not constructive in any way.
/r/MensRights06/11/13 02:45 PM
2

Hey look, a perfect example of hateful and exclusive speech to help make my point - thanks!
/r/MensRights06/11/13 02:43 PM
6

What beliefs don't you subscribe to, exactly, if you don't mind my asking? Because if you agree with the need to combat hateful, exclusive speech as you say here, I don't really understand how you could not disagree with much of modern feminism.
/r/MensRights06/11/13 05:13 AM
4

Wow, how reasonable and eloquent, you are really contributing a lot to this discussion.
/r/MensRights06/11/13 05:11 AM
10

If he is asking questions in an attempt to bait someone into saying something he dislikes so he can attack them, that is not contributing.
/r/MensRights06/11/13 05:09 AM
0

You make less sense with every word you type. The fact that you think rape is a grey area and a subjective concept means I am done with you.
/r/MensRights16/10/13 05:08 AM
-1

They were all drunk. A bunch of drunk people got together and made some bad decisions. It is not uncommon, and the man in question shared the responsibility with everyone else. You sound like the type who would defend someone claiming they got raped after they went out with someone, both got drunk, had sex, and later regretted it and felt like they were 'taken advantage of'.
/r/MensRights16/10/13 03:43 AM
19

I find it incredibly hard to believe that most members of this sub would be willing to excuse the behavior of a conscious, drunk woman who fooled around with another man and then told her boyfriend the next day that she didn't remember it.
/r/MensRights15/10/13 03:19 PM
2

...6? I had an admin role in the Marines, and my DIs ripped me up and down every time we did pullups at boot because I could only do 10. The only guy in my platoon pegged as a recon candidate was up to 25.
/r/MensRights13/10/13 03:13 PM
4

If this was a documentary and these characters existed in an objective sense with the show creator trying to portray them to us, you might have a point - but their existence as it stands begins and ends with the show. What the creator intended to portray matters infinitely less than what he actually did portray, and so his intent is only selectively useful in understanding and judging the characters.
/r/MensRights06/10/13 01:40 PM
6

You realize that the creator of the show having an opinion or intent regarding the way his characters are portrayed does not make that some sort of gospel truth, right?
/r/MensRights06/10/13 01:19 PM
13

Why don't they have to take his allegations seriously? Why weren't the girls handcuffed and held while it was determined whether they were trespassing?
/r/MensRights13/07/13 06:19 AM
2

Sexual is not the same as reproductive.....
/r/MensRights12/06/13 07:06 PM
1

I challenge you to provide a single shred of proof for this claim.
/r/MensRights12/06/13 07:05 PM
22

ITT: a bunch of folks who don't know what 'sexual assault' means, just that it sounds dramatic. What if someone punches me and their fist contacts my chest? Nipples are sexually sensitive, so I guess that is sexual assault right there...
/r/MensRights12/06/13 05:27 AM
0

...you think that disliking the idea of being in combat with someone who couldn't pull me out of there if I got shot is an "egotistical douche move"? You are clearly delusional, and I am done with you.
/r/MensRights24/01/13 03:29 PM
1

Your overreliance on sarcasm has reached a point where it is impossible to tell what you are trying to say. I literally can't tell which side of this debate you are even on. Sarcasm is something which should be used occasionally for emphasis, if it is going to be used at all - it should not be a primary theme of literally everything you say.
/r/MensRights24/01/13 10:41 AM
1

There is a big difference between the two roles. If we are on the front lines alongside one another, and you can't carry me out of there if I am injured, it is me who is running a greater risk of getting fucked.
/r/MensRights24/01/13 10:08 AM
1

most jobs in the military are not that physically demanding; and many weight/physical standards are to ensure a general level of fitness ...and yet a 5' tall man who spends his military career as a clerk behind a desk is held to the same physical standard as a 6' infantryman...whereas as it stands now, the infantrywoman heading to the front lines would be held to a lesser one.
/r/MensRights24/01/13 10:06 AM
6

...of course it is. That doesn't change the fact that when fighting alongside someone, your life may well depend on their ability to carry you out of a combat zone if you are severely injured. Strength standards for combat positions should be the same for everyone.
/r/MensRights24/01/13 10:04 AM
6

The victim in this case was an idiot, who should be chastised for his poor life choices. That is not "blaming" the victim or trying to excuse the actions of the perpetrator - it is just common sense.
/r/MensRights07/12/12 04:06 PM
13

I feel vaguely uncomfortable any time I come into a place of business and there are people just sort of hanging around outside. I mean, think about it - the whole point of something like a gas station is for people to walk in carrying money and walk out carrying purchased goods. The parking lot is not a particularly comfortable place to hang out, so when you see a group loitering there, it is easy to wonder if they have some other purpose in mind. So...just in case that makes you feel any better…
/r/MensRights20/11/12 10:53 PM
9

It isn't a matter of cutting out all possibility - it is a matter of deciding whether the probabilities involved are worth it.
/r/MensRights28/10/12 10:30 PM
0

As it has been already said, if the man were to have done what the writer claimed she did, then Cosmo would be raging about how he's a terrible person and whatnot. Do you have some evidence for that?
/r/MensRights02/10/12 02:14 PM
-2

Reactions from members of /mensrights to anyone posting anything which isn't over the top anti-women get worse all the time, which is why I essentially never bother to read or post here any more. So this is no surprise. You are joining those who are acting as though I am saying her behavior is ok because it is a prank. That is not what I said at all. I said it was "messed up", "bad to condone", and a mark of an "entitled asshole". So yes, those who pull pranks like that are assholes, not friends…
/r/MensRights02/10/12 02:12 PM
-14

How does that dispute anything I said? Boys pull pranks on one another all the time which go over the line and cost someone money, destroy cherished possessions, cause heartache, etc. It has nothing to do with gender, it is just someone being an entitled asshole - which men and women are equally capable of.
/r/MensRights02/10/12 06:42 AM
-9

How does this have anything to do with men vs. women, though? He acted like a jerk, she pulled a messed up prank on him in return. It is bad to condone or encourage that sort of behavior in anyone, but it doesn't somehow become worse because it is a woman doing it to a man.
/r/MensRights02/10/12 06:33 AM
1

Some women want to be taken seriously in the workplace. Some women want to be stay at home moms. Neither of these are out of line in any way - it is only the subset who demands both which is a problem...so don't treat the issue like everyone fits into that relatively small subset.
/r/MensRights24/09/12 01:51 AM
2

I don't know what the reaction was at the time, but those would be boring matches. The vast majority of female pros would either need to take it down a notch for the whole match or would be visibly exhausted by the start of a fifth set.
/r/MensRights23/09/12 02:23 PM
5

Why can't women have the right to be taken seriously in the working world if they choose to pursue a career, while alternatively being allowed to want to be a stay at home mom?
/r/MensRights23/09/12 02:22 PM
5

There are over 46,000 people subscribed to this sub, and a couple of dozen people on that list. There is nothing like a "decent chance" that the name of any given reader is on it.
/r/MensRights13/09/12 02:51 PM
28

a member of the most reviled group of humans in the world ...as a (presumably) white male in the modern Western world? Seriously? I am all for better understanding and education on issues which affect men, but sensationalist drivel like this is part of the problem.
/r/MensRights11/09/12 03:37 PM
1

So that would be, what, 25% of his take home pay? That honestly doesn't strike me as all that unreasonable.
/r/MensRights11/09/12 03:12 PM
6

That is a pretty twisted way to describe being a full-time caregiver and housekeeper.
/r/MensRights11/09/12 06:03 AM
3

I don't know how old you are, or what sort of groups you spend your time in - but it is not healthy for there to be nearly the level of assumption you describe in your sexual encounters.
/r/MensRights25/08/12 02:31 PM
1

That's pretty messed up, and sleazy and filthy way to manipulate a conversation. I'm sorry but you are pathetic and I cannot continue a debate with a liar who edits a comment to make the replies seem insensitive and contextually different. This was your reply to my comment, based on your wrong assumption. And I am the angry one? Goodbye.
/r/MensRights17/08/12 02:39 PM
1

My comment has not been edited, dumbass. Edited comments have asterisks by them. I'm done with you in any case, though.
/r/MensRights17/08/12 05:29 AM
0

Do you really need to watch a video before you try to share your judgments on it with the world? Yes, you fool.
/r/MensRights16/08/12 06:43 AM
0

You keep citing those same statistics. They are completely irrelevant to this discussion. If behavior like that in the video you posted is immoral, it is immoral no matter what sex it is being done to. Men are capable of thinking things through and making rational decisions when it comes to sexual activity, no matter what our genes might influence us toward.
/r/MensRights16/08/12 06:42 AM
3

I'd be just as outraged if they tricked some girl into exposing herself in the same manner. And yet, when people point out that the web is filled with these "ex-girlfriend" videos, you just say "oh those are staged". It didn't even occur to you to ask whether this video was staged, despite the fact that there are plenty of humiliation vids out there which are. Your level of bias is simply disheartening.
/r/MensRights15/08/12 01:04 PM
1

...has this sub really devolved to the point where overblown nonsense like your comment is being upvoted? I haven't been here in a while, and it looks like I won't be coming back.
/r/MensRights15/08/12 01:01 PM
7

.....you didn't even watch the video that you are linking to, yet this thread is full of your comments regarding what an outrage it is?
/r/MensRights15/08/12 01:00 PM
2

This is a truly asinine argument you keep making. You sound like a rape apologist saying "but men are programmed to want to have sex with women whether they are willing or not".
/r/MensRights15/08/12 12:58 PM
3

If you are unconscious and someone has sex with you without prior consent, then yes, that is rape. People, however, do things all the time of their own volition while drunk which they don't remember (or at least claim not to) the next day, which is not the same.
/r/MensRights24/07/12 02:26 PM
8

This post is really bothering me. When women make identical claims, most of the folks on this sub are chiming in with doubts - the fact that you don't remember now doesn't mean you didn't consent at the time, are you sure you don't just regret it and want to believe that you didn't consent at the time, etc. But since it is a man, nothing but an outpouring of sympathy.
/r/MensRights24/07/12 05:52 AM
44

...how on earth is there "no need to blame the wife"? She is clearly delusional and dangerous to any man who could potentially end up involved with her.
/r/MensRights22/07/12 08:11 PM
1

Ok buddy. Keep telling yourself that.
/r/MensRights03/08/11 02:32 PM
1

Like the other person replying here, I can't tell whether you are trolling or just desperately trying to justify yourself. BMI has nothing to do with being fat, but being fat certainly does have something to do with being fit, even though it is not impossible to be both. Actually, you originally asserted that a woman who claimed to be overweight and very physically active was being dishonest, alluding that it is impossible to be fit and fat If you had read my comment, you would see that I said i…
/r/MensRights03/08/11 02:29 PM
1

You are being ridiculous. We are saying that fat people tend not to be fit, which is a true statement. Your rejoinder of "oh, so linebackers aren't fit??" is childish. There are exceptions to almost every general rule.
/r/MensRights03/08/11 01:53 AM
1

Muscle definition may not have any direct relation to fitness, in that it is not a necessary component; but there is certainly a correlation. Most fit people, whatever your specific definition of fitness might be, are not obese. It is ignorant to say that excess fat has nothing to do with fitness levels; having it certainly makes it more difficult to maintain physical fitness, and it is a small percentage of obese people who would meet that qualification (certainly much smaller of a percentage t…
/r/MensRights03/08/11 01:50 AM
4

Even if I were personally less picky about weight, I would be very hesitant to message a girl who was overweight but insisted throughout her profile that she was 'extremely physically active and played a variety of sports'. I mean, I realize that is possible, but it certainly strikes me as at least a likely contradiction/indication of dishonesty.
/r/MensRights03/08/11 12:17 AM
21

Do you honestly think saying 'call the police if you see a man holding a child's hand' is an effective way to raise awareness of child abuse?
/r/MensRights29/07/11 01:28 AM
1

Hmm, after reading a lot of the examples here I think I was a bit...harsher than most. I didn't use any profanity though, so maybe it will still get counted?
/r/MensRights18/07/11 01:25 AM
10

Why on earth is the word raped in quotation marks in that story?
/r/MensRights13/07/11 06:17 PM
24

True, and the laws in place may well be worth opposing. That does not, however, justify you making shit up in an attempt to make your point sound more dramatic.
/r/MensRights13/07/11 04:03 AM
10

I am trying to find a citation for this, but am pretty sure you are severely overstating the case. It is against the law to display Nazi symbols or use their slogans, or otherwise advocate for Nazism in Germany; but certainly not to mention them.
/r/MensRights13/07/11 03:38 AM
2

If this is an accurate description of what OP was going for, 'bad joke' is a serious understatement. The reasoning isn't even internally consistent; on one hand he is trying to equate coffee with sex, and on the other hand introducing Folgers (as a backhanded reference to those old commercials) implies that it isn't about sex at all. He just rustled up a few cliches about feminists and slapped them together haphazardly, and it is kind of disappointing to see all the upvotes for it.
/r/MensRights11/07/11 03:20 PM
1

Huh...ok, I think I get what he was trying to convey now. Still not sure why it would be attached to a picture of a woman desperately trying to cover her breasts and vagina (if the point was that she was really worried not about being assaulted but about her coffee tasting terrible)...but anyway. Edit; just as an addendum, I am the other poster who said he had watched the video - watching it just doesn't help. The 'joke' here is basically just two separate feminist cliches being jammed together …
/r/MensRights11/07/11 03:16 PM
1

Sarcasm can contribute to a conversation at times, by highlighting the absurdity of a claim for example...but the same cannot be said for a confused rant filled with as much bitterness and as many irrelevant cliches as the poster could jam into a paragraph.
/r/MensRights11/07/11 03:14 PM
9

Agree with the commenter below, this was extremely not helpful. I am aware of the controversy over the elevator incident - I just in no way understand what Folgers has to do with anything.
/r/MensRights11/07/11 05:17 AM
12

I am pretty confused here, despite having watched the linked video. Can someone fill me in on what exactly the photo is referencing?
/r/MensRights11/07/11 04:44 AM
8

A perspective I am turning over in my head; how is this different from a plea bargain? If someone agrees to plead guilty before your trial, they often receive a lesser sentence than someone who fights and loses. No one seems to be up in arms over that, so why all the outrage over something which is essentially another chance to take the same opportunity?
/r/MensRights11/07/11 01:01 AM
3

This isn't exactly just rewarding good behavior, because you have to essentially confess to ('take responsibility for') the crime you were convicted of, even if you pled not guilty and fought it during your trial...this is more like an extension of the idea of a plea bargain; admit guilt and receive a reduced sentence. I'm not sure how I feel about it.
/r/MensRights11/07/11 12:59 AM
7

Well this was a helpful and well-reasoned addition to the discussion.
/r/MensRights11/07/11 12:57 AM
8

it seems just as petty and full of people willing to side with their gender because it's their gender. I really hope you are not subscribed to TwoX if you consider that a problem. I loved the idea of reading and participating there to learn more about the female perspective, but time and time again found it to be an incredibly biased environment.
/r/MensRights08/07/11 02:30 PM
9

Your thoughts are not shared by all who claim the label 'feminist', I am afraid.
/r/MensRights04/07/11 03:55 AM
1

They won't want to pay all the troops they'll need. You do realize that drafted troops in the U.S. still get paid, right?
/r/MensRights14/06/11 06:07 AM
17

Regarding the view expressed in the fourth panel: a man feeling that a woman 'owes' something in reciprocation for a dinner is not an indication that he is at risk to rape her. I think we all assign a certain value to any time/energy/money we spend on another person, and hope that it will be reciprocated in some form, even if that desire is subconscious. There is nothing wrong with not wanting to be the only person giving, it is only wrong if you try to take something in return...and the two are…
/r/MensRights11/06/11 09:26 PM
10

He realizes that they can't - he was asked if they should be able to.
/r/MensRights11/06/11 02:49 PM
5

She actually specifically pointed out that she likes her method because they are all first dates, and therefore generally lacking sexual expectations.
/r/MensRights08/06/11 05:31 PM
2

Isn't there a common perception that a man insisting on a male doctor for that sort of thing is a mark of insecurity? That is the only thing about this whole topic which really bothers me, that I feel like a standard response to a man saying he only wanted a male doctor would be for him to be told to 'grow up' or that 'female doctors are just as capable as males'.
/r/MensRights04/06/11 03:49 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter