TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

rebelcanuck Archive

View 10 posts and 116 comments by rebelcanuck on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

This is the fakest thing I have ever seen come on.
/r/MensRights13/12/15 12:39 AM
2

There's a difference between the elements of an offence and a defence going to the state of mind (guilty mind vs. guilty act.) It's like if you murder someone and plead insanity. It doesn't mean the person wasn't really murdered.
/r/MensRights23/10/14 04:48 PM
0

I know that. I just think it's an absurd leap to say that most allegations are false.
/r/MensRights08/07/14 06:31 PM
1

Come on that is ridiculous. Rape is a hard thing to prove.
/r/MensRights08/07/14 04:07 PM
1

The Venezualan woman was played by Cecily Strong who I met pretty sure is actually hispanic.
/r/MensRights09/03/14 03:33 PM
-1

So who's the chauvinist pig, the puppy?
/r/MensRights29/10/13 10:58 PM
3

Guess they thought no one would believe it was 9gag so they switched tactics.
/r/MensRights25/07/13 05:29 AM
3

edit: If you're looking for proof as to how I know that they were changed for that reason, I only have my own opinion. Yeah, that's what I meant. I don't know how prevalent the whole rape fantasy thing is but that sounded very speculative.
/r/MensRights22/07/13 05:20 PM
1

This would be very interesting if proven. Where did you read this?
/r/MensRights22/07/13 05:01 PM
0

I think those are supposed to be inclusive rather than exclusive.
/r/MensRights22/06/13 05:34 PM
7

Nothing wrong with doing what this mother did. The kid was curious about her body, so the mom showed her what her's looked like. Like she said, you teach your kid about everything else. Showing your kid your body one time out of curiosity is fine. What I do find annoying about this article is how she contextualizes the issue with "a culture that often tries to deny women control." As if all fathers are totally fine with talking about their son's penis. Like someone else on this thread said, boys…
/r/MensRights16/04/13 05:27 PM
0

As always, there is a protest being planned for it: **On April 4th, the Men’s Issues Awareness Society (MIA), a student group at the University of Toronto, will be hosting their next event. A campus based offshoot of the innocuous sounding Canadian Association for Equality, these campus based Men’s Issues Groups are cropping up on campuses across the country and proliferate the rhetoric that the hardships men deal with are the result of feminism and the growth of women’s rights. While young men …
/r/MensRights25/03/13 08:54 PM
18

I would go as far as saying this post doesn't really belong since it's just a few people's dumb opinion and not rights-related.
/r/MensRights10/02/13 11:35 PM
0

I don't think it's totally feminist. There seem to be a few anti-PC post-left lifestyle anarchist types in there. But it is predominantly feminist, no doubt. This thread I didn't even bother commenting in because I was already in enough arguments on the "you're not a real anarchist if" thread (which made the bold claim that you can't be anarchist if you "support rapists"- you can guess what that really means.) I've been thinking about starting a generally leftist oriented MR subreddit for this e…
/r/MensRights07/02/13 05:48 AM
2

35 is a joke. It's a reference to the popular children's books, Where's Waldo.
/r/MensRights11/12/12 06:15 AM
53

Yes, the CCLA
/r/MensRights10/11/12 05:25 AM
2

Well, I am disappoint. I just met with a couple guys from this group yesterday, and then saw the poster for the Warren Farrell talk at a UofT building. And then I check out their website to see this on the front page. I'm both excited that there's a men's rights group in my city now, ground zero for the Slutwalk, and disappointed (but I guess not that surprised) to see that they're under attack already. I guess it's mostly a good thing, seeing as how these arguments are so weak and self-serving.
/r/MensRights08/11/12 07:42 PM
1

It was a good response until you invoked Godwin's law.
/r/MensRights08/11/12 07:35 PM
13

They're trying to see if Mens Rights can be phrased in the same way that women's rights is. They just don't get the point that in neither case is it one sex oppressing another but the whole of society oppressing people because of their sex.
/r/MensRights08/11/12 07:17 PM
0

Yeah, class is the only real privilege.
/r/MensRights21/10/12 05:10 AM
1

That's not what I meant at all. But fine, shut me out for making a suggestion.
/r/MensRights20/10/12 03:55 AM
2

"When a man claims that women are naturally maternal... he is a sexist." Seriously?
/r/MensRights19/10/12 05:47 PM
14

Why don't we just refuse to sink to their level and keep playing it fair so we keep our principles? Not sure what to do but I don't think that's it.
/r/MensRights19/10/12 05:35 PM
2

This isn't really the place to be talking about Israel. But no, that's not reality. They haven't officially taken land since 1967. But unofficially, they control all Palestinian land to various degrees, so yes they are annexing, they just aren't officially redrawing maps because what they're doing isn't legal. As for the Palestinians themselves, a lack of a nation state does not erase centuries of existence.
/r/MensRights16/10/12 05:12 AM
1

Yes of course there is much difference. But the challenges white people face are still just kind of limited to affirmative action and the like aren't they?
/r/MensRights15/10/12 10:49 PM
1

I dunno same kind of culture for the most part. Except Canada tries harder to be more multicultural so I guess we're more PC that way.
/r/MensRights15/10/12 03:48 PM
1

Yeah, it's probably more susceptible to that since white racists are an actual organized group unlike misogynists. Plus I think white rights issues are still pretty few and far between in Canada/US if you don't mind me saying.
/r/MensRights15/10/12 03:17 PM
1

They just refuse to believe there's anything to be said for men's rights no matter how much evidence I put forward.
/r/MensRights15/10/12 02:55 PM
3

I actually have been thinking the same thing. Feminists use their past oppression (or perceived past oppression, if you subscribe to GirlWritesWhat's anti-revisionist theory) to make the point that they are an oppressed group, and are still being oppressed now somehow. They then take this cause too far, demanding that they get more rights, at the expense of others, and if you question it, you're a misogynist. I find this very similar to the oppression dynamic in Israel right now. They use the pa…
/r/MensRights15/10/12 05:08 AM
1

I just get flamed for them. I gave up trying to convince FB friends of any of this stuff.
/r/MensRights15/10/12 04:47 AM
1

This isn't even that bad compared to stuff I seen. There was this one pamphlet that called DV a "war on women."
/r/MensRights09/09/12 04:07 AM
3

AFAIK, HIV prevalence in Africa is much worse than anywhere else.
/r/MensRights27/08/12 03:17 PM
1

You'd think so. I don't doubt the sincerity of their motives, I just think they're too stubborn to try other things such as giving safety advice. They'd rather just blame it on "rape culture".
/r/MensRights05/08/12 11:51 PM
2

Why would they? Any safety precaution you could possibly give a woman to avoid rape is "victim blaming" in their eyes.
/r/MensRights05/08/12 12:57 AM
13

Professional feminists do. When your job becomes fixing a problem, you will always need a problem to exist in order to keep your job.
/r/MensRights30/06/12 01:07 AM
5

That's funny because one day at my work that exact same thing happened with the genders reversed. Only the manager gave the man a stern warning in front of everyone and told him he's not welcome in the store anymore. So yeah, being far from "kinda laughed at it", that is a definite double standard.
/r/MensRights28/06/12 08:34 PM
1

Is her life equally ruined? Or is she the subject of "high-fives with their teammates" that the kids involved apparently all got for "scoring" with an older woman?
/r/MensRights17/06/12 05:37 PM
5

You mean Canada?
/r/MensRights17/06/12 01:45 AM
1

once that goal is achieved there is little doubt that feminism will disband and the members shall join/create other groups to better the world. LOL good one!
/r/MensRights21/05/12 03:12 PM
13

Some of those are just outright absurd, but some are actually dead accurate satire. Love it!
/r/MensRights18/05/12 11:48 PM
0

Yea, I would never bother attacking something as crazy as this. Nobody can be expected to take it seriously. Just thought I'd share the vid tho as it makes some points about MR.
/r/MensRights17/05/12 05:36 PM
1

Yes! I always think of that equivalent when I see something like this.
/r/MensRights09/05/12 06:43 PM
7

I know I would!
/r/MensRights09/05/12 03:45 AM
18

Tucker Max is not a journalist, he's a crude humourist. Big difference in terms of what they can get away with.
/r/MensRights24/04/12 01:49 AM
4

Yola, a 25-year-old Swedish trainee psychiatrist, says she dumps boyfriends who insist on standing. ''What else can I do?,'' said her new boyfriend, Ingvar, who sits. You can chop off your balls and carry them in your purse, Ingvar, that's what else you can do.
/r/MensRights20/04/12 05:25 PM
2

You beat me to the re-post. It's refreshing to see all the R/Canadians who aren't falling for this obviously one-sided, agenda-driven survey and are coming to their own conclusions.
/r/MensRights13/03/12 07:08 PM
2

What about this: say he lied about the music, and he was looking for porn, just not CP. That's entirely plausible. Should have told the truth right off the bat, but still not his fault.
/r/MensRights08/03/12 12:18 AM
2

But then WHY would he report it to police? Makes no sense.
/r/MensRights07/03/12 02:21 PM
2

I'm totally with breasfeeding advocates, but I thought they were all about the right to breastfeed in public. You know, let people do what they want? Apparently they don't want to let others do as they want if they want censorship of ads depicting bottles, how insane is that!
/r/MensRights02/03/12 06:24 AM
0

Honestly, they're just children's cartoons. They're simplified and formulaic. I don't think young children can grasp 3-dimensional characters, so they get archetypes, with the same storyline every time.
/r/MensRights07/02/12 02:26 AM
13

This is some sick shit. The whole article. It's alternately disgusting and just strange, a weak attempt to defend a barbaric tradition.
/r/MensRights07/02/12 02:17 AM
3

Since when are feminists "anti-trans"? In my experience, I see feminists routinely umbrella-ing in queer rights causes, I've never seen transphobic feminists. Don't think those ladies at the McDonalds were on a lunch break from their Women's Studies class.
/r/MensRights28/12/11 04:34 AM
8

I'm sure a lot of people would feel safer flying in a plane that bans Muslims, don't see that happening though.
/r/MensRights28/12/11 04:19 AM
1

That's a gross exaggeration. The Sun is the Fox News of Canada. The Post is certainly right-leaning, but they don't play loose with the facts. In any case, the MRM is still so far out there politically, being right-wing hardly makes one friendlier to it, despite the inverse being true.
/r/MensRights25/12/11 03:33 AM
1

Well now I wish I payed more attention to the publisher. But the thing is, it wasn't some big women's group, it was just a publication for my local region's (county's) social work type services. It was just about getting help with abuse and, apart from that first paragraph was pretty much free of outrageous interpretations.
/r/MensRights24/11/11 09:51 PM
3

Yeah, I knew people would dismiss this but honestly, I think Cracked is more reputable than some think it is.
/r/MensRights08/11/11 05:47 PM
12

Spelled chivalry wrong at the end there. Other than that, great blogpost. Unbelievable how far this double standard extends, I'm glad we have such a high profile example to point to.
/r/MensRights07/11/11 04:20 PM
1

Now, "child" is a nebulous definition at the upper limit, and "adult" is a nebulous definition at the lower limit, and we should do the best we can to write laws that take this into account, and we should enable prosecutors and judges to use their discretion. We do have laws that take this into account. Teens between 14 and 16 can only have sex with someone of similar age, but 16 year olds can have sex with anyone. Until jurors get the ability to magically be able to tell if an encounter is abus…
/r/MensRights06/11/11 12:52 AM
1

Yea, and Ontario almost got a premier who promised to make the registry publicly available, among other questionable things.
/r/MensRights06/11/11 12:38 AM
0

Maybe you should consider moving him to an alternative/vocational school.
/r/MensRights05/11/11 04:23 AM
1

Not quite non-existent. Search "feminist frequency" on youtube.
/r/MensRights05/11/11 04:11 AM
1

Yes, it was statutory rape, this campaign can go ahead. Though I would stress that I only want to participate in this to expose the double standard and take action against this woman, because I don't support California's stupid statutory rape laws.
/r/MensRights03/11/11 09:32 PM
0

I doubt it. If that was indeed the case, you really should find whatever article it was that said that, it would defeat the entire premise of the march IMO.
/r/MensRights28/10/11 08:16 PM
3

Too true. The strawman fallacy of "rape supporters/apologists" proves so powerful people fear speaking out against these extremists.
/r/MensRights11/10/11 06:42 PM
6

“You talk to men and you ask them that question, ‘What did she do to consent?’ and they’ll say ‘Nothing.’ And I’ll say, ‘That’s sexual assault.’ ” What on earth does that mean? Either she was conscious and able to protest if needed or she was passed out.
/r/MensRights10/10/11 11:28 PM
2

"Fucking him up with the dildo" is a few words away from rape. When read carefully, I came to the conclusion that it wasn't, but it's still a pretty bad sexual assault.
/r/MensRights30/08/11 01:34 AM
1

Excellent summary of facts. No wonder the case got thrown out.
/r/MensRights27/08/11 03:59 AM
1

Apparently being a feminist makes you more qualified to judge a case then a district attorney.
/r/MensRights24/08/11 11:03 PM
2

Poe's law. It honestly looks like a serious column.
/r/MensRights24/08/11 10:33 PM
37

I saw a picture of an un-cut naked dude in an art museum when I was 17, and it was horrifying. That's some hardcore misandry. Imagine the reaction to "men prefer women who's clitoris was mutilated at birth."
/r/MensRights22/08/11 12:07 AM
2

I wish I could read the thread but they redacted almost the entire thing. holy censorship!
/r/MensRights21/08/11 07:37 PM
1

This was the first thought I had when I was younger that started pointing me towards advocating for Men's Rights.
/r/MensRights21/08/11 07:22 PM
3

Yes, but the point is, the sign is saying that women's safety is of specific concern. Maybe there is an epidemic of assaulting women in the workplace, but I'd much rather get slapped a few times than fall off a scaffolding to my death.
/r/MensRights19/08/11 04:33 AM
7

I've read stats on here that men are victims of workplace accidents much more than women. So why the gynocentrism? Or am I missing something?
/r/MensRights19/08/11 03:57 AM
2

As a resident of the GTA, I think this is a fantastic idea! I assume you're at St. George campus downtown? I go to a school that has a joint program with U of T at Mississauga if that's any help. If you get this off the ground, I'll be sure to mention it at my school's next Gay-Straight Alliance club meeting.
/r/MensRights13/08/11 03:58 PM
9

of course not. bitch, cunt, there are all male equivalents, women have no right saying it's anything more than a swear word.
/r/MensRights13/08/11 03:49 PM
5

"the lack of respect that men seem to have for women in the first place" Isn't it disrespectful itself to assume all members of a sex disrespect you?
/r/MensRights07/08/11 04:30 PM
3

awesome! just joined the facebook group.
/r/MensRights26/07/11 11:26 PM
3

Man, his rants are great lately. I think he's slowly becoming an MRA. First he calls the "you're a rape supporter if..." girl the dumbest person ever, than blast Rebecca Watson, now this.
/r/MensRights23/07/11 03:12 AM
1

Perhaps the MRA-bashers got scared off by the non-representative women-bashing posts? A bit naive but that is possible. I believe there was a debate here about whether it is relevant to post links that only serve to show women in a bad light, and the mods maintained it is necessary to erase the stereotype that women can do no evil. Unfortunate they have to do it that way, but I'm glad you stuck around.
/r/MensRights22/07/11 11:31 PM
5

Any specific anti-male laws I should know about? I'm well aware of the Human Rights Commission's stance that white males cannot be discriminated against, but anything else specific to Canada?
/r/MensRights21/07/11 02:28 AM
8

I upvoted it because it's true, and helps build credibility, but you're right, we don't really NEED to prove ourselves. Users of this subreddit, and MRAs in general are so dedicated to objectivity and fairness, it's quite refreshing. Makes me wonder what in the hell MRA-bashers are talking about.
/r/MensRights21/07/11 02:05 AM
7

what exactly is this all about?
/r/MensRights20/07/11 06:23 PM
10

As fucked up as this is, it's kinda nice to have a clear-cut, unarguable rallying cry such as this. I can use it to "come out" as an MRA on my facebook. For once the misandry and double-standard is so blatant, anyone can see it.
/r/MensRights20/07/11 01:38 AM
2

makes me ashamed to be part of the city that started it.
/r/MensRights28/06/11 05:06 AM
7

I agree with most of that article, but not the conclusion. I think the psychological trauma experienced by the victims is the reason it is seen as an especially heinous crime, not this image of sexual purity.
/r/MensRights09/06/11 05:29 AM
2

I suppose that was the point of the comment. There's so much "men are this, women are that" and then a couple little "they are seen as..." and the entire tone of the comment changes. I still think it's absurd to blame patriarchy for men's rights issues nonetheless.
/r/MensRights08/06/11 04:07 PM
48

Wow, the sexism. I thought feminism was about overcoming restrictive gender roles. How silly of me.
/r/MensRights07/06/11 11:05 PM
1

Holy crap, that one's even worse! I can't even imagine why the feminists were mad at that one. Seems like anything that portrays male sexuality in a positive light is "chauvanist"
/r/MensRights01/06/11 03:56 AM
1

Yeah but this guy was invited to a conference so they could hear him give safety advice. They asked for it, and he gave it to them honestly, and held a protest in the streets when what he said wasn't sensitive/PC enough for them.
/r/MensRights30/05/11 11:14 PM
2

Makes some great points. I still can't believe how women can be so outraged at cops giving out safety advice.
/r/MensRights30/05/11 02:59 AM
6

oh god! that is sick on so many levels.
/r/MensRights30/05/11 02:54 AM
1

No Peace for Predators? That's outrageous! There's already no peace for them, they don't need these angry vigilante mobs coming after them.
/r/MensRights27/05/11 01:36 AM
11

I find it absolutely disgusting that he played the anti-Semitic card. It happens far too much, especially when discussing Israel.
/r/MensRights27/05/11 01:17 AM
17

This is a public train we're talking about. They were both inside a vehicle full of ordinary people and possibly security personnel. I can't imagine why she would feel unsafe. Your anecdote about getting stalked is completely different.
/r/MensRights25/05/11 12:18 AM
3

This is so far left it's off the map. I think it's "marxist idealogy" in the same way the Westborough baptist church are "Christian Right"
/r/MensRights23/05/11 02:41 AM
1

reminds me of an MP in my country that was forced to apologize for basically the same thing. Saying anything short of "ALL MEN ACCUSED OF RAPE SHOULD BE FORCIBLY CASTRATED AND JAILED FOR LIFE" is apparently offensive.
/r/MensRights19/05/11 02:36 PM
2

Love this idea. I'd totally buy one!
/r/MensRights11/05/11 02:21 AM
1

I'd say elimination of the concept of "rape culture" all together. And bring forth the concept of "anti-rape hysteria culture."
/r/MensRights11/05/11 02:20 AM
2

sure makes any feminists whining about the wage gap seem ungrateful.
/r/MensRights04/05/11 02:29 AM
2

How would you react if a group of 3 guys, looking like a biker gang, would follow you a few city blocks. It can be scary.> Are you saying all men are like biker gangsters? Or that an average woman and an average man is the equivalent to an average man and a gang of three people? Either way, I don't like the comparison.
/r/MensRights24/04/11 08:52 PM
2

so true. women want total equality but all of the special rights
/r/MensRights20/04/11 06:19 PM
1

great article! good job digging deeper to reveal the double standard with the beer-glass assault. It's a shame this guy had to apologize for speaking his mind. I suspect he wouldn't have caved so easily if he wasn't running for public office.
/r/MensRights08/04/11 11:16 PM
3

sorry if it mislead you. The point was that there are varying degrees of sexual assault, and that in very light cases he believes they shouldn't go to jail. Whether he thinks this particular fellow should have gone to jail isn't clear, he just says he thinks three years was too much.
/r/MensRights08/04/11 02:11 AM
0

the thing is all he said was (in response to how to avoid rape): don't dress like a slut. Now, I understand this can be offensive to some women who've been raped and didn't dress like a slut, but he was just giving advice. And he's probably right. Of course, whenever a guy says "you can lessen your chances of being raped if you don't dress like that" all feminists hear is "It's entirely your fault that you got raped because you dressed like that"
/r/MensRights06/04/11 05:50 PM
1

here's another likely situation that almost happened to me: say there's a guy and girl hitting second, third base, NOT engaging in coitus because they have no protection then the girl, whether because of hormones, short-sightedness, or plain inconsideration decides to climb top while he's still hard. Then not only did he technically get raped, but he might be on the hook for child support if she gets pregnant.
/r/MensRights06/04/11 04:04 PM
5

holy crap, Orwellian state control combined with misandry these guys are nuts!
/r/MensRights04/04/11 02:57 AM
3

well I don't know why there's so much hate, I thought this blog made some nice concessions, which most feminists won't even bother to do, even if she ignored issues like false rape accusations. And for the record, she DID admit that there are plenty of circumstances when women could be more privileged then men.
/r/MensRights02/04/11 04:13 AM
4

He's talking about the lawyer suing clubs for having ladies nights. which admittedly is dumb because the men want more women in the bar, as do the bartenders so it's all win-win-win. But the implication was that all modern feminism is in the same vein as the suffrage movement, and that men are absolutely privileged, even in the legal system. So that's when I got mad.
/r/MensRights01/04/11 05:02 AM
9

feminism in areas like Africa and the Middle East is genuinely needed, as they are actually basic human rights issues there.
/r/MensRights01/04/11 03:30 AM
-1

I think the article is getting at something. There IS a lot of porn out there that can push you into all kinds of weird fetishes and stuff and desensitize you to what is conventionally sexy. It also does create an unrealistic image of sex. So I have nothing wrong with the message behind this, or I wouldn't if it was written by a man. If it's written by a woman, than yeah, she wouldn't know
/r/MensRights12/03/11 03:12 AM
1

I think it's a great ruling. No matter the math, car insurance rates are very discriminatory. What if they surveyed the race, colour, or perhaps sexual orientation of drivers? I don't think charging black people more for insurance would go over well in America. I'm not an expert but that's just my 0.02.
/r/MensRights03/03/11 06:13 AM
1

yea, now I know more of what happened. Although I still think being put on the sex offender registry is a bit more than a "slap on the wrist", looks like he did deserve it
/r/MensRights01/03/11 04:35 PM
1

At the time of posting there was huge outrage over the one Winnipeg free press article. The article seemed biased and incomplete. The only other person who was at the trial claimed that she didn't say no. I partly posted this to try and find out the truth because I wasn't finding much of it, only huge amounts of outrage.
/r/MensRights01/03/11 06:35 AM
2

the thing is nobody cares to wait for it. This one article has spawned dozens of other articles, hundreds of blogs, and thousands of comments condemning the judge's decision, despite the fact that this article clearly tells less than half of the story.
/r/MensRights25/02/11 04:17 PM
1

Reminds me of the ridiculous old adage "never hit a woman" one of the most sexist things I've ever heard.
/r/MensRights14/02/11 05:19 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter