TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

recreational Archive

View 1 post and 30 comments by recreational on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

What if there's communities for every conceivable viewpoint, experience, hobby, disturbing fetish, or whatever the fuck online because the internet is big?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/15 04:24 PM
-1

No.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/14 10:30 AM
0

This would be obnoxious behavior for two people in a close relationship regardless of their genders and romantic status. Like, do you treat your friends like this? I mean really now. And talking over the woman and not listening to her opinions, how is that "dream feminist behavior"? This is just, "Durrr, feminists suck and don't really want what they tell us they want they want alpha guys like me." What the fuck goes through your head that you think this doesn't make you look like an idiot?
/r/TheRedPill28/04/14 02:09 AM
-1

I mean I think it's relevant that my experience is never, "Hey, MRA here, you know this issue is linked with male circumcision and really we should be addressing both together, here's how we can do that."
/r/MensRights13/03/14 11:38 PM
-1

Unless of course I agree with you, in which case it's perfectly fine to make claims about the science without linking a study. All the studies I saw on Google were behind a paywall, so if you have access to one you can search for "circumcision aids study" and pick one that you can read.
/r/MensRights13/03/14 05:44 PM
-12

Well, "female circumcision" can refer to a multitude of rituals, some as simply as pinprick that has no lasting damage of any kind. But generally the focus on female genital mutiliation is basically about removing the clitoris, which yes, is much worse than the results of anything but a horribly botched circumcision. Does the issue of male circumcision have a place in discussions of female circumcision? I think yes. Yeah, maybe, that's not how MRAs present it though. It's presented as, "How dare…
/r/MensRights13/03/14 02:24 AM
-14

Did you actually read that article before trying to link it as an example? Yes, it's derailing if you start posting rants about male circumcision when people are talking about female genital mutilation and demand that we start talking about this other thing instead. That's pretty much the definition of derailing. I find it interesting that MRAs only ever want to talk about these issues when women are trying to talk about women's issues actually.
/r/MensRights13/03/14 01:32 AM
-9

then they should actually do something about it. Like the case with prison rape or male rape generally, the only time I hear MRAs complain about this is when attempting to derail a discussion about womens' issues, in this case female genital mutilation. So this is probably the most ironic possible complaint.
/r/MensRights13/03/14 01:30 AM
-17

despite the fact that circumcision doesn't reduce chances of AIDS; This is not what the medical science says. When met with resistance to their bullshit stance on male circumcision, these UN feminists are against outlawing male circumcision. What bullshit stance? Feminists are at worst neutral and pretty often supportive of campaigns against circumcision. The health advocates pushing it to prevent the spread of AIDs etc. aren't feminists, or at least don't advise the UN etc. in that capacity. Wh…
/r/MensRights13/03/14 01:28 AM
-21

I've never seen or heard of anyone in the feminist movement being anything but supportive of attempts to stop male circumcision. What I'm gathering from your post, and what I gather from most of these posts complaining about supposed feminist hypocrisy, is that you went looking for a semantic argument and found it, and now you're pretending to be sad.
/r/MensRights12/03/14 11:46 PM
7

I say no to my female friends all the time. Maybe don't have shitty friends by not being a shitty person and this won't seem so alien an idea.
/r/MensRights12/03/14 11:40 PM
16

20 Repeat steps 17, 18, and 19 simultaneously.
/r/MensRights12/03/14 11:36 PM
8

Problem: Your being downvoted proves nothing. They could just dislike retards rehashing previous submissions for no reason other than to play a martyr and broadcast the huge chip on their shoulder. The actual thread you're trying to mock is full of people defending the accused against assumptions of guilt anyway.
/r/MensRights10/08/10 06:06 AM
3

Research universities, which nigh-universally barred women up until recent times, with even most Ivies refusing to accept them until the 60's and 70's, thus entrenching inequalities that would take generations to overcome and securing the unjustified sense of superiority for half the species for years to come.
/r/MensRights10/08/10 05:48 AM
0

It's true that I'm using cultural stereotypes, but that's only in response to cultural stereotypes. But hey, if it's stereotypes that don't hit groups you belong to, it's okay, right? Also, Kentucky is a shitty state. That has zero to do with people being poor or white, since there's lots of states with mostly poor white people, like Ohio or Tennessee, that suck a lot less. So yeah. You get butthurt about the plight of white people, but don't care about FingerOfDeath perpetrating the harmful ste…
/r/MensRights09/08/10 08:37 PM
0

What racism? Is "people from Kentucky" a race? Or are you making things up?
/r/MensRights09/08/10 08:14 PM
1

1) Illogic is the noun you were looking for. 2) On the non-existent chance that you were trying to describe bad or harmful logic, and retarded enough to use the word "ill" instead of another synonym to avoid causing a needless confusion, the hyphen still would not have been earned by even the most generous interpretations of grammatical rules. Is it a prerequisite for being a racist, sexist douchebag that you have to be incapable of ever admitting when you're wrong?
/r/MensRights09/08/10 07:30 PM
1

Yes, actually. A group that was 3/4 women, and that my sister led, won accolades for their presentation at the program's annual competition, and were so successful that they were invited to present the same at an NSA-led security conference in D.C. last month. So, yeah. You're an idiot. Sorry.
/r/MensRights09/08/10 07:27 PM
1

My sister and her female friends dominated their program at Stanford, actually. Maybe you don't see many smart women because you live in bumfuck Kentucky.
/r/MensRights09/08/10 07:10 PM
0

facepalm It's illogic. Not ill-logic. The logic isn't sick. Christ, you're the worst troll ever.
/r/MensRights09/08/10 07:08 PM
-4

Those leeches contribute nothing to the society, just suck welfare, steal and murder. Do they sit on their fat asses in their Kentucky trailers getting welfare checks to buy a computer to bitch about minorities and women based on Stormfront talking points while pretending to be shit they're not to try and validate their pathetic and ignorant opinions? Because, yeah, then those guys totally suck.
/r/MensRights09/08/10 06:53 PM
-3

Aww. Poor Stormfront baby is sad his lies are exposed.
/r/MensRights09/08/10 06:51 PM
-3

The word liberal means lots of things to different people across ages. It's fairly useful as a general-purpose pejorative, denoting a person supporting homosexuality, feminism, globalism, Marxism, "hates" the rich and successful, think that mobocracy is a viable political system, and is always looking for the big daddy govt to solve their personal problems, preferably on somebody else's expense. Such liberals are the same everywhere. And again you prove that you're just a typical America conserv…
/r/MensRights09/08/10 06:28 PM
-8

Again, you fucktarded liberal dimwit: I'm not an American This may shock you because you've probably lived your entire life in bumfuck Kentucky or wherever, but some of us actually know people from other countries. And while almost every country has a "right-wing" camp and a "left-wing" camp, the definition of those terms fluctuates wildly from country to country. In Europe, for instance, conservatives are generally perceived as the anti-immigration camp; but part and parcel of that is a condemn…
/r/MensRights09/08/10 04:47 PM
-2

What, your friends on Stormfront? Don't lie. Don't regurgitate American right-wing talking points down to the same trite catchphrases and act as if you're just some independent minded foreigner tired of that derm hellhole Europe. Why are American conservatives such habitual liars? What do they think they have to gain by discrediting themselves?
/r/MensRights09/08/10 04:32 PM
-5

I see that you have attended Glenn Beck University, and gained the knowledge commensurate to that experience.
/r/MensRights09/08/10 04:19 PM
-1

Yeah, I read the thread and I didn't see anyone making the arguments you're citing. I think you're just trawling to be a martyr.
/r/MensRights09/08/10 03:49 PM
2

In fairness, the woman in this case alleges that the husband knew about it; the lawyer and family are saying differently, but it's certainly possible that she's correct. But if it's not correct we have a problem, yes.
/r/MensRights22/07/10 07:15 AM
8

You can say that having a penis and scrotum has absolutely no effect on someone's identity. That doesn't make it true. That doesn't remove the partner's right to decide their own preferences.
/r/MensRights22/07/10 12:27 AM
2

Sturgeon's Law. It's demonstrated in this thread in several different ways.
/r/MensRights26/10/09 06:21 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter