redbattleaxe Archive

Upvotes	Title	Category	Author	Subreddit	Date (UTC)

Upvotes	Comment on	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
1	Dating after divorce age gap Unless you are offering her something rare, she probably will eventually. Lying about your age is different than wearing make up and you just showing your whole ass for the predator that you are with that too. Makeup isn't a lie. It also doesn't have any consequences. Age does. Imagine if the woman was 15 and told you she was 18. Jail time. Saying your are younger than you are also means she may thing you are a good fit for things you arent. Age is an important for family planning. It may be mor…	/r/Divorce_Men	07/07/26 05:18 AM
-1	Dating after divorce age gap As someone who was the younger person in an age gap relationship, it is predatory more often than not. The older person can take advantage of a younger person with less life experience. I dont have the same issues dating men my own age. The older man had issues I could not even fathom at the time. I didn't even know how to check for the red flags because I lacked the experience to know they existed, and there were many of them. A man my age wouldn't even have the time to have that much baggage. …	/r/Divorce_Men	06/07/26 07:35 PM
1	Dating after divorce age gap I don't think its that women aren't accountable, I think women have an issue with the narrative that women are MORE unattractive than their male counterparts. I'm sorry, but when I look at men in their 40s and 50s, most are very unnattractive. I just dont understand why we can't admit that. The same goes for women. As for men and women that take care of themselves, I've seen attractive 60+ year old men and women. It boils down to care more than anything, but the majority of both are unattractive…	/r/Divorce_Men	06/07/26 07:30 PM
0	Dating after divorce age gap I love how another commenter was talking about the older person being predatory, and then you prove her point. Nice job!	/r/Divorce_Men	06/07/26 07:23 PM
1	Male expendability is baked in to our evolutionary psychology! To have a "safer" way to do what we have always done. I'm not sure why you think we are so much different now than before. We really aren't. It always goes back to having the most resources. Back then we hunted and gathered for survival. Killed when we had to. Had our tribal wars. Now we are doing the same thing but with more complex things for efficiency and to make life easier. We go to work to get resources. We don't have to kill nearly as much which is good and "safer". But it's the same thi…	/r/MensRights	25/10/22 03:02 PM
1	Male expendability is baked in to our evolutionary psychology! It doesn't work like that. You can't "get passed" your biology. Thats like a computer program "getting passed" its code and doing something completely not in the scope of its code. Also its not about women deciding to be protected or not, its something in a lot of men that just protects them. They can't help it. I don't know why. That's just what I've heard. In fact when I was still in high school we had an army man in our classroom saying that he doesn't think women should be in the army for th…	/r/MensRights	25/10/22 02:49 PM
0	Male expendability is baked in to our evolutionary psychology! I'm going to get off your guys sub now though and let you have your space. But a good thought is... if you can find a reason why something works from an evolutionary standpoint, you have likely found your answer. Everything goes back to evolution and what has allowed us to survive. And even though we are in modern times, that doesn't mean our brains all of a sudden become modern.	/r/MensRights	25/10/22 01:23 PM
1	Male expendability is baked in to our evolutionary psychology! Idk, why don't you ask your govt leaders (which are typically males btw). I don't think we should have any wars. Let who choose? It's instinctual. Most men don't choose to be horny or not, they just are (or arent). It's not something you get to decide. I think its actually men who typically consider other men expendable. I think this because most mothers live their children equally and would not sacrifice their son just because he is a male. I'm not sure where that teaching came from but I didn'…	/r/MensRights	25/10/22 01:20 PM
0	Male expendability is baked in to our evolutionary psychology! If we ever go back to cavemen times then yes, unfortunately men will be more expendable again but considering we live in the modern Era, we should try to move past it... to an extent. Even now it's not a good idea for women to go into war. I know people like the idea of full equality but two issues here. First, I've heard a few men say that they absolutely could not leave an injured woman behind in combat. He will still with her and die with her if need be. This is dangerous. Women could be a di…	/r/MensRights	25/10/22 01:36 AM
1	"If every woman decided to not have kids, the government would probably step in to ensure that the human race survives, so the perception of free will in regard to having kids only exists for women so long as other women are willingly having kids." Well yes, but you need fewer men to get the job done and what are the odds of men not having sex when it is overall pleasurable for them? Thats not going to happen. Women could still have sex but just he on birth control, not keep the kid, not take care of themselves. Women have more control over this situation. It's just very unlikely the same situation would occur with men considering how little control they have over the outcome and how sexually driven they are any way.	/r/MensRights	24/10/22 09:39 PM