TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

redbluepie Archive

View 0 posts and 64 comments by redbluepie on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Yes it's comparable. Some people just don't like the idea of someone who lets a person they've just met or barely know into their personal space so freely or for short term gains.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/22 10:02 PM
2

With all the exclusions of controlling, authoritative and spoiled, what's the ideal family background then?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/22 09:42 AM
6

2012 - guy asks woman out, pays for expensive dinner on first date. Pricey gift by the third. Gets ghosted. Rinse repeat. 2022 - guy asks woman out, coffee date first meeting, splitting the bill at a nice restaurant by third outing. Does he think less of 2022 woman, is he not attracted her?is he making her wait? or has he lived learned and wants to play his hand differently hoping he has better outcomes? If it's not about living and learning or a past to compare to, they could be super attracted…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/22 02:38 AM
1

Rightly so but either way that's not relevant to the post discussion.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/22 08:38 AM
2

Why though? What has changed for him?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/22 05:52 PM
2

Meaning... you are more likely to see relationships where the woman is more attractive than the other way round. Woman value physical and personality attributes moreso than men do. Sure a few would have settled but i doubt it's more than half if that.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/22 05:32 PM
3

No because people sleep with each other based on attraction. If good guy Y is not attractive physically or personality wise and doesn't change these parameters, all those who were attratctive are now also good. Guy Y moves to the bottom of the pecking order. Otherwise what is guy Y's proposition value in your new world?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/22 05:19 PM
3

If it wasn't true you wouldn't see objective 7+ women with men who would be rated less than 6, but this how most relationships are weighted.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/22 12:33 PM
7

If a woman X is not sleeping with man Y while he is good, more good men in your utopia will only make things more competitive for him?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/22 01:30 AM
2

Format better bro. A lot of posts on this sub in particular just don't seem to like spacing.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/22 01:04 AM
1

Men should do more to not high five or turn the other way when they see dodgy behaviour but why do you think if all men become 'good' that would benefit virgin men? If someone is a virgin not for the lack of trying, the first question is what other factors are in play?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/22 01:00 AM
2

Step family content is apparently quite common. Is that going to lead to an increase in these types of relationships? For a lot of bm, being fetishized as a mandingo is a turn off for them. A lot of projecting or something going on in this post and ultimately, why does interracial dating matter to to you personally?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/22 08:34 AM
1

It's a lazy approach. Just encourages more mass swiping by men. Why do you want to just pick a date on what she looks like and two sentences? Women would prefer if you read the bio. Your resume idea. Listing out accomplishments could turn into displaying arrogance and just makes it easier for the foodie daters and gold diggers. Maybe you could have something with a voice note exchange. 3 question prompts or scenarios. How would plan the perfect night in for us / The waiter has got our order wron…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/22 08:24 AM
1

Fair point, maybe 5"11 is a bit too "short" but being put off by tall girls is a thing. - tallgirls
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/22 07:42 PM
1

Why so?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/22 07:19 PM
1

It's evolutionary logic. Little boys look up to successful masculine men and try to emulate them. They have as little need to understand why they do that (to eventually reproduce) as a kitten does to understand why it wants to play (so it can one day hunt). I like the analogy but note the use of the word, masculine. This was kind of my point. That's linked to height. Tall would be penned as a characterstic for a superhero because of that, (edit)moreso (edit) than the female gaze.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/22 11:27 PM
0

What are their names? Quick google, is captain canuck one of them?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/22 11:12 PM
0

By all means people pick what they think is the best partner, but at the point you pick tall problematic guy over shorter caring guy, you are not actually doing justice to yourself on a technical basis. Interesting point about disability as it is physical but it is also quite likely to make day to day life more challenging and therefore a legitimate dealbreaker. I think the things i listed are though also physical, all visual or superficial and like you say with balding make little sense in the …
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/22 11:09 PM
4

I think it's more to do with the perception of strength, influence and reverence that's required of a superhero and maybe a cool factor. A 6 year old boy is probably thinking about that rather than what his pig-tailed class mate is thinking? Maybe some others will chime in but looking at your response in reverse, I'm having difficulty in comprehending Stan lee focusing on what women want when sketching out Spiderman, instead of just being cool, tall and all 3 characteristics above. (Pew-pew)
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/22 10:09 PM
18

Should it matter? Technically no. But neither should any other physical attributes about a person that they were born with or could not prevent. -Baldness -Small breasts -Woman with deep voice. -Man with high pitch voice -Objectively unattractive face or facial features. -Women over 5"11 Do you think the male height matters to men? Most if not all superheroes are designed by men. How many are short rather than towering? What do you think the ressoning is?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/22 09:15 PM
3

This is nothing to do with hypergamy and a lot to do with how easy it is to have a choice. Men and women. Online shopping, uber eats, spotify, netflix, dating apps. It's all the same. Less incentive to just choose something/someone and run with it. Search is infinite. Did you dismiss a woman for saying hi or hey? If so. If you had caught someone's eye in a bar, and they came over and said hey, would you just turn around and leave? It's not that deep, both genders do it though. Maybe the women yo…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/22 05:42 PM
4

You're overthinking everything.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/22 12:17 AM
29

Worse. It is like netflix for everyone. You may really want to settle into something but keep flicking because there might be something better on the next screen. Even if you meet up it can be the same. Saw this news piece on a guy who would go on dates and open up the app while their date was in the bathroom or something. Option paralysis. Ghosting and people just being obnoxious. "If you're just going to say hi, don't bother - swipe left" But what can you do when the world is becoming less soc…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/22 12:13 AM
5

They don't need women's permission or approval. I really think we should start telling men that after a certain age women will never want you for you and that pursuing women is a waste of time This isn't a solution. Men need to not make their whole life be defined by whether they can get laid or not. At some point, paid sex without companionship/contentment with being single is going to take it's toll. What happens when the money runs out too?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/22 12:30 AM
1

Ahh ok fair enough. We still wouldn't know what her intentions were. Lots of hedge fund peeps marry their secretary or the girl next door. At what level of income or status would she have to have had not to be considered in it for the money?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/22 06:34 PM
2

Well she was with him when he was average joe, so ehy not? But we can only speculate. Noone here knows them that well..
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/22 07:54 AM
1

Ah, got you. 👍🏾
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/22 07:02 PM
22

If it was a dead bedroom not licence to cheat though . Break it off or come to a mutual arrangement?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/22 05:54 PM
5

Handling emotions, access to mental health treatment or at least a friendly ear stack things against men. But also unintended complacency. The world has changed and some men are not ready for the shift. While women have continued to pursue settling down with a partner, they also embrace living independently out of choice , some men continue to place their whole life on being a provider for a woman, that contentment in other things are put on the back burner. Less women to go round and then theyr…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/10/22 08:01 PM
2

Would make more sense if April was an ex for the point you're trying to make. Jake may have spent lots of money on 'fun' dates with his ex gfs, only to be messed around or dumped. If when he started dating Sarah he wanted to take it slow and wait 3 months before spending big to make sure she's not looking for a free ride, so be it. He's entitled to be cautious.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/22 11:13 PM
2

Marrying an 18yr old at 30 is weird. Their brains aren't fully developed to say the least and you admit as much by saying that she could be brainwashed from her upbringing. Yet.. also fear that the brainwashing could be reversed by more 'brainwashing' from feminists. One is ok but not the other? As long as you treat your wife with respect and not as property, there's little reason for her to break away from traditional values. If she does, she probably wasn't fully on board in the first place. D…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/22 04:24 PM
8

Is your post just about casual sex? Or sex generally?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/22 03:05 AM
28

Infidelity and domestic violence are commonly cited as reasons for divorce. Various sources show that men are proportionally most likely to be the perpertrator in those circumstances. example. Would make sense then that women would most likely file be the ones to file. If women are the perpetrators for those reasons or others, men I suspect would be more likely to grin and bear it, or adopt the stance that'd be cheaper to keep her.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/22 12:52 AM
5

Because we live in a world now where everyone is is encouraged to do what they want, be themselves as long as it doesnt hurt anybody else, which is fine. But also that's led to a delusion for some that their choices have to be accepted by others. Someone can choose to get tattoos allover their body and face. They may be as a person tge best partner-material in the world so "it doesnt matter how many tats they have" but no one is obliged to forgo their non-tattoo preference because someone made t…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/22 06:20 AM
13

You ask women what is a turn off in men they will say arrogance, or if he thinks he is all that. Why is it okay for women to be arrogant, and conceited and rate themselves highly but if a man does it they think its a turn off and he is full of himself? It's not ok either way. Why do some women have a double-standard about boasting about their attractiveness?The same reason some men have a double-standard about boasting about their income or career but if a woman does the same they are viewed neg…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/22 04:33 AM
1

keep in mind that the main reason men dont want to date a whore is because it is a liability in a relationship. the more promiscuous the woman is the harder she is to trust and to feel secure in a relationship with. ur bodycount is a strong indicator of how trustworthy u r and how likely the relationship is to succeed. This isn't the main reason. Why do you feel that someone who has slept with x amount of people can't be trusted, fidelity, or other factors?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/22 03:29 AM
1

Think of it another way. You're at a party and someone you're interested in does one of the following, i) takes a sip from the drink of 10 other guests ii) sits on the lap of 10 other guests, iii) kisses 10 other guests. Are your thoughts simply, nothing to see here and nothing as to why? It doesnt have to be a negative conclusion but it's natural to speculate.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/22 12:45 AM
6

she is left to find another man to depend on, which may take a couple days to some months, depending on her effort. What? What are you basing this on. The world has changed. Gone are the days that average Joe can work at the factory and cover all expenses while his wife stays at home and looks after the kids. One income just isnt going to cut it anymore for the majority of people. For those who are able to be sole providers, there simply isn't enough of them to go around to support the female po…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/22 10:52 PM
40

I wouldnt use the term ran through for anyone but yep high number of casual sexual partners raises an eyebrow. Is it a sign of risk taking, insatiable appetite, over indulgence, entitlement etc?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/22 05:54 PM
1

Better sexual organs for pleasure. A vagina’s sensitivity provides way better feeling than even an unmutilahed penis. What? You have no way of knowing this. Easier to get laid and being able to be the chooser while guys fight over you. Easier, maybe for some but quality over quantity surely is a significant factor. The fact female gender mutilation is considered a crime however male circumcision isn’t. Doesnt mean boys shouldn't have the right to choose but probably not criminalised because of t…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/22 05:09 AM
8

Anyone can aspire to be a provider. It's whether they're realistic about how they're going to get there. The problem with manosphere preachers is majority are not realistic they preach that they want to lead and provide but havent got a clue. Mid 30s and sports betting and doesnt know to buy groceries? He seems too far gone/coddled for a reality check. He might reach his goals but if he doesnt likely indirectly put you at fault and tell his friends you werent supportive. You sound like a good ca…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/22 11:30 PM
3

All it is proof of, is that the rich and rich-aspiring live in their own world. They play by different Rules. Most women don't yearn for this type of arrangement. Single parent, and kid has to share father with 9 others living in different homes? This is it not the norm and if you insist it is, produce some stats.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/22 03:52 PM
1

Your whole post is based on conjecture and an algorithm running in your head about superiority. Jason Momoa was besotted with Lisa Bonet from a young age Interview. You're maybe literally the first person I've heard to say Mariah didnt deserve Nick - come on!
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/22 09:17 PM
1

Option 2 - there should be in principle no better person to be at home than a parent. sometimes grandparents bend the rules a bit. Once the kids get to school age, part time could work but best for parent to be there when school ends. Really depends what kind of characters are in the mix.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/22 06:44 PM
3

Foodie dates, gold digging, pump and dump and infedility in marriage are subject to fines. Child/spousal support is awarded relative to the median standard of living in place of residence. Counselling mandated before marriage, when an unplanned pregnancy ocurrs and post divorce. Therapy available to all teenagers. Anyone who speaks negatively in absolutes about men or women receives a thirty day ban from the internet and mandated critical thinking course.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/22 06:21 PM
1

The other stuff doesnt have to be about women. It's perfectly fine to live your life absent of them. It's good to get outside and try new experiences and hobbies where you can invest your time into it. Pursue what brings you happiness. Something needs to change for you if you want to enjoy life and not endure it. You just need to figure out what that is. Good luck.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/22 01:42 PM
1

Isolation isn't the solution. I mean find a new group of people to be around. Like if you've been with same people since school or college, join a sports club or meetup group, travel to another part of the country or abroad. I've yet to meet one of these mythical good women. Have I been mildly tolerable? My wanting to listen and appreciate another human being. You need to sell yourself more. Have you tried a life coach or a mentor? And the last point maybe living for yourself is the best thing f…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/22 11:50 PM
1

What were you presenting as your standout characteristic? If the vetting is through people you know mostly, still could unintentionally attract certain type of women. Sometimes you need to move in different circles which may expose you different characters and can also bring new perspectives. Or an independent vetter. Women aren't a monolith. Some are awful, most are not. Change your environment, or perhaps be open to considering whether something needs to change about yourself.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/22 07:56 PM
1

In person and online. Ok I'm guessing the large proportion of that number is online. If so a lot internet spaces can become echo chambers. You go in a mens sub, women are evil. Womens sub, men are evil. Coupled with my point about positivity, people don't generally don't actively talk about the good times, it would be seen as boasting in some ways. These are mostly venting areas. Added a question about vetting before you replied. I'm guessing you believe that women are generally hypergamous ?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/22 01:29 PM
1

Thousands? Can I ask, in what capacity? Exact opposite - it's also known that men are also reluctant to open up to other men. Is it more likely that a man will say to another, I got upset about my grandad today and my gf gave me a cuddle, or something more negative and general like she's cold, uninterested, and a bit of an expletive. Reddit subs - We're talking about relationships though. How many subs exist for positive stuff over negative. Even if you want to include the general feelgood subs …
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/22 01:02 PM
1

Lol it's one thing if it's putting up with clipping toenails in bed or a lazy partner and another to encourage enduring more toxic traits. . Some people endure toxicity over being alone but in the long run it could be to their own detriment. In relation to the subject at hand given mens mental health is often under the radar, I just dont think its beneficial to tell them to suck it up.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/22 03:29 AM
2

If you're going to say absolute statements, it's only fair you show your working.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/22 10:44 AM
3

And what of the 300+ replies on this thread? On your observations, maybe you are unwittingly attracted to a certain personality type? Mens view - When people speak up about an experience there's saying that if you have a positive one you tell 1 person, when it's negative you tell 10. If you think about reddit subs, how many are dedicated to cool- things-my-partner-did, over anti, rant and soapbox subs?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/22 10:42 AM
6

Did you conduct a survey to arrive at this conclusion?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/22 09:33 AM
3

Then you dont have to put up with it. It's like some people are sociopaths or narcissists. Cut them off
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/22 03:12 AM
19

. Every gf I've ever had that was with me during those moments reacted in a negative way. Then they werent right one for you in the long run. Partners should support and be constructively critical where needed but never tear-down or belittle.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/22 03:26 PM
1

Before the streaming generation there were hotlines and tv channels where women would whisper what you want to hear or writhe around on the screen on request (charged premium rate per minute). Men voluntarily called in and ran up their phone bills to indulge in fantasy with misplaced hope. Could this be described as networks immorally taking simps money? These transactions of old and more recent times are marketed to the masses. It's a lot different to being led on in a one to one physical inter…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/21 04:18 AM
2

That's not really what was said though. Things are not that black and white. There appears to have been numerous factors in play with TRP being one of them. Mental health and lack of intervention from familial and social circles probably played a part too. It's not about blame. Some people consume TRP sensibly and lead productive lives , others send rape and death threats to women. At very extreme end up like Rodger. When people are part of a group and one of the group defects to Rodger/terroris…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/21 05:35 PM
2

Said he seems to have been and provided an article. You've said in no uncertain terms, he wasnt so...
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/21 04:45 PM
2

pretty clear they wanted this to be the narrative Possibly. This isn't really about mass shooters, it's about extremes and how far one side will go because they have tunnel vision.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/21 04:39 PM
0

When you say 'nothing', what's the basis? Happy to consider a source that suggests he was never on it at some point?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/21 04:10 PM
1

There, and on other forums, Rodger identified as an “incel, or “involuntary celibate” — a virgin who couldn’t get girls, even after taking “the red pill.” Care to expand on your take? Incel status seems to be gradual . No he is not the embodiment of the red pill but depending on which content you're digesting, some of it is good advice and some very bad leaving guys in a state a flux of and frustration. Same could be said about FDS content but it never goes to Rodger level.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/21 03:45 PM
-1

Seems that he took it straight, no chaser.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/21 02:21 PM
13

Maybe referring to incidents like with Elliott Rodger and the Plymouth shootings. FDS can be really grating on the ears.. (maybe eyes rather) but there's a a clear imbalance on which side takes things to the extreme.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/21 12:07 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter