TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

redditcoruum Archive

View 0 posts and 31 comments by redditcoruum on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Try http://shop.americanbar.org/ebus/ABAGroups/DivisionforBarServices/BarAssociationDirectories/StateLocalBarAssociations.aspx For instance, I am in King County, WA, I can go to http://www.kcba.org/ and on the left there is a lawyer referral service.
/r/MensRights07/01/16 02:47 AM
2

Aren't there some lawyers that work off taking a % of the winnings (forgot what you call that)? Contingent fee
/r/MensRights26/12/15 09:58 PM
3

Stop.. just stop with your facts! (although a few links to authoritative studies might help) You are completely destroying the Matriarchal Paradigm, you must be stopped at any cost. /s
/r/MensRights18/12/15 07:20 AM
3

Depending on where you are I guess "retaliation" against a sexual harassment complaint can be a separate and more easily provable violation of law Yep, and that would most likely be best handled through the National Labor Relations Board. Employees do not need to have an attorney to assert their rights, but having one does help.
/r/MensRights30/10/15 02:37 AM
1

If what you say is true and you work in the US, then you may want to speak with your local NLRB regional office and/or file charges through the EEOC. If you are not in in the US, I have nothing much more to say.
/r/MensRights30/10/15 02:35 AM
2

Good luck.
/r/MensRights15/09/15 09:24 AM
-1

No, it is not. That you think that these two things are equal shows a lack of basic understanding of the law. Employers are in almost no ways the equal of a public ally funded school. While the employer cannot legally force an employee to remove any sign, an expression of free speech, from an employee's personal property, the employer could possibly legally terminate the employee if the speech is not a form of Protected Concerted Activity.
/r/MensRights28/08/15 03:09 AM
-1

is exactly the same as an employer threatening you or I after we hang an obnoxious sign off our own porches, on our own residences, away from work time and the employer's property. No, it is not.
/r/MensRights28/08/15 03:01 AM
2

First thing I would suggest to you is to get your own ducks in a row. Obtain copies of all your past performance reviews and copies of your company's policies; then put all of that in a safe place, for when you are retaliated against for having had the temerity to address this issue. Also educate yourself on what Protected Concerted Activity is, and know where your nearest NLRB regional location is or have their number ready. Document all steps you take in addressing this issue and all communica…
/r/MensRights11/08/15 10:01 PM
1

And the laws I just presented, enacted by the federal government, can effect a reversal of an illegal termination. Which shows that your statement is false. A State law does not reign supreme, there is the pesky thing called the Supremacy Clause. I can be fired, specifically because I am black, a woman, or christian, and an employer can point to 'at will' all they want; that does not change the fact that the termination was illegal.
/r/MensRights10/07/15 09:05 PM
1

The right to legislate employment issues is reserved to the state, not the federal government. Strange... FLSA and NLRA are both federal laws enacted to address employment issues. Would you like to change your position?
/r/MensRights10/07/15 08:18 PM
1

The company has a 0 tolerance policy for sexual harassment. That policy may violate your rights. Having an over broad policy might violate your rights, you may want to contact your regional NLRB. I am not saying they will be able to do anything for you, but a policy that is over broad in regards to "civility" may be a violation of your rights. I read this just in the past day, maybe it will help you. While most of it is educational, the portion on 'Civility, “respect,” anti-harassment and abuse,…
/r/MensRights11/06/15 09:42 AM
1

The investigation found the accusations to be true, but your employer would not show you the proof of the investigation? If there was an investigation, for sexual harassment, you should have been asked to provide a statement. The accusation was that you sexually harassed a former employee or a customer? Were you involved in the investigation? Do you work in the US? If so, which state. Do you have any paper work from your employer showing their hiring/firing policies? Even if you work in an "At w…
/r/MensRights11/06/15 07:21 AM
5

I did not watch the entire performance, there was no need to. I'd like to ask anyone/everyone that watched... Did she follow through?Did she have sex with those 30 men that accepted?
/r/MensRights20/04/15 10:31 PM
3

Ya, that one caught me too. I would be curious to know what law the judge was asserting when the judge imposed that sentence, other than the judge's own individual opinion.
/r/MensRights06/03/15 04:11 AM
1

This male personality is a moron.
/r/MensRights23/09/14 11:39 PM
1

Yep, I read that update link while I was replying the last time.
/r/MensRights20/09/14 08:49 AM
1

I do not remember seeing the 'Update link' when I read the original article, that is why I asked you the question I asked; whether I missed a reference or you were making assumptions. I am glad that I took the time to look back at the article to find the associated link that. She said she was "sick", but otherwise completely dependent on his VA check for income - meaning she doesn't collect any disability herself. This is not what the article states, you are making assumptions. So she's not disa…
/r/MensRights19/09/14 08:54 PM
1

I did not see any reference in the article on the 'ableness' of the spouse. Did I miss a reference or are you making assumptions?
/r/MensRights19/09/14 06:12 AM
2

I've actually had to do this with my a past roommate a few times. I was not looking to receive any gratuity from the woman (I wouldn't have turned her down though), it was just the right thing to do, at least to me
/r/MensRights04/07/14 03:09 AM
1

It is my understanding, mind you through reading articles posted on avfm<sup>1,</sup> that the victim<sup>2</sup> has made claims, with no proof<sup>3;</sup> that she was attacked by someone she believes is a member of the MHRM. I digest what avfm prints with a bit of skepticism. I also digest what a victim<sup>2</sup> says with a bit of skepticism. I also take umbrage when an individual blames another, in this case the MHRM, for an act, but is unwilling to back up their claims. <sup>1</sup> Whi…
/r/MensRights22/04/14 08:59 PM
1

The problem with the term "false rape allegation" is that the definition of the term means different things to different people. The term might also be defined differently by the same person depending on the circumstances of the accusation. Each accusation of rape needs to be determined individually on it's own merits. Just as each "false rape allegation" needs to be determined individually on it's merits.
/r/MensRights18/04/14 12:35 AM
2

Unfortunately you failed to answer the question posed. I for one would appreciate an answer to the question Is this a reddit wide rule or just a /r/mensrights rule?
/r/MensRights09/04/14 10:09 PM
1

Ohh.. how about this one.. Female soldier, I think she was 19 at the time, at Reception breaks curfew goes out and gets drunk, returns to Reception and starts making too much noise. The MPs are called, she assaults two of them. Nothing happens to her at all. After she makes it to our unit again she gets shit faced drunk and assaults other MPs. The 1st SGT makes it go away and then (somehow I don't grok how this happens) she's accepted and sent to West Point.
/r/MensRights19/08/13 07:53 PM
14

I had a disagreement with another soldier, I was an E2, she was an E3. I said something like "I don't care what you think" and she threw a metal (5 gallon) fuel container at my head, I blocked it with my arm. When a higher ranking soldier (E4) got between us saying he did not want to see anything like this happen again I said "Don't worry, if she does that again I'm just going to beat her ass". Guess who got the Article 15?
/r/MensRights18/08/13 09:32 AM
1

Edit... Double negative and I don't like conjunctives.
/r/MensRights29/04/13 09:11 PM
0

100%? Really? Seriously? None that I have heard of. And I doubt that anyone can put forth a myth that is 100% untrue.
/r/MensRights21/03/13 09:48 PM
1

I'm going to enjoy waking up tomorrow (today) to see how this goes.
/r/MensRights14/03/13 09:44 AM
3

This article also does not discuss when the false claims we reported to the DPP. Were they reported *Before the allegedly accused was prosecuted *After the allegedly accused was successfully prosecuted *While the allegedly accused was being prosecuted
/r/MensRights13/03/13 08:39 PM
5

By comparison, over the same timespan, there were only 35 prosecutions for making false allegations of rape my emphasis added. This only discusses the amount of false claims that were prosecuted, not the amount of false claims referred to the DPP. There is a difference. Is anyone able to glean the total number of false claims reported to DPP?
/r/MensRights13/03/13 08:01 PM
8

Seriously? Did I just read what .. WAT!? I don't know if I should laugh at the stupidity of the woman writing that or be angry because of the hypocrisy of the woman writing that.
/r/MensRights07/03/13 11:37 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter