TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

redditer0 Archive

View 1 posts and 109 comments by redditer0 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

redditer0/r/askTRP12/10/17 01:05 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

An exercise for the mind: what would happen with Earth resources if all the humans had the buy capacity of a high class american?
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen01/10/20 11:55 AM
1

Social innovations are done daily by politicians. The problem with "good" innovations is that they fail to acknoledge the fact that humans are selfish and competitive (even the ones that say they are good), and no system can work ok without including those strong human emotions because they will exist anyway and will pervert any "good" system. That's why capitalism > communism. Although current capitalism is not great, a society run by selfish and "idealistic" millenials would be worse because a…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen01/10/20 11:52 AM
3

What you are saying makes sense but it's harder for men to have sex with a lot of woman. So is not really a big problem to find men with low n-count.
/r/TheRedPill09/05/20 05:08 PM
1

That could something to do with the fact people under 65 go out more.
/r/TheRedPill20/03/20 07:53 PM
1

He was probably sending a lot of messages to a lot of women, and then filtering the ones who responded.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen08/03/20 02:41 PM
3

Women get insecure when they find other women have different lifestyle choices and/or opinions.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen26/02/20 06:26 PM
1

It's possible that some of them really don't want kids but most of them they are probably just following the current moral fashion.
/r/askTRP14/02/20 01:45 AM
1

Sorry, there are so many things I disagree in your message that it's impossible to have a small conversation, and I'm not interested in a long conversation. E.g. saying that killing a baby it's "control over their bodies". Or that women having 50/50 representation is "fair" for some reason (but, weirdly, we don't see similar claims about, e.g., average longevity and money put on women/mens health policies). There are a lot of assumptions in your message that I don't agree with. Also, "lack of fe…
/r/TheRedPill01/02/20 07:34 PM
1

In your opinion, what is the legit reason feminism still exists in the West? I mean, what's the purpose of "real feminism"?
/r/TheRedPill27/01/20 02:57 PM
5

Feminism is not related to equal rights but to equal outcome in scenarios where the outcome is desirable, an privileges for women (special protections, etc.) where the outcome is not desirable, and giving women power cards so they can control any social situation and destroy any men that is against their power group (hate speech laws, etc.)
/r/TheRedPill23/01/20 11:56 AM
1

It's because they way both use language is very similar.
/r/TheRedPill22/09/19 07:10 PM
2

Some things are true but they create negative emotions. People don't like negative emotions, specially women. So anything that brings negative emotions should considered "false", because logic doesn't matter. And men will white knight anything that makes women feel bad, because they don't see an argument but an attack. Also, for both sexes is hard to analize something in an objective way if it's related with them.
/r/TheRedPill10/09/19 07:17 PM
12

As explained by padlegmake, your argument it's a classic feminist fallacy. The fact you can proove or estimate that 10% of ufo images are false doesn't mean the other 90% are true. You need to also show what's the % of cases that could be proven. Sorry for my bad english.
/r/TheRedPill29/07/19 03:00 AM
6

"If your willing to put in the initial work, regardless of how hard it is, the world is yours." Capitalism doesn't work like that. The ones who inherit millons will almost always be at the top of those who inherit less (most people in the world), with a really few exceptions (Bill Gates, etc.). Meritocracy is good, but capitalism is not a meritocracy.
/r/TheRedPill23/02/19 02:54 PM
1

She's probably worth a lot right now.
/r/TheRedPill12/02/19 02:53 AM
7

"no matter how happy we are, she can just come up with something as simple as that and call it quits." This can happen to anyone. Not only to men
/r/TheRedPill12/02/19 02:25 AM
7

Use Bitcoin.
/r/TheRedPill10/02/19 11:01 AM
1

"Are there supposed to be benefits for non porn addicts" Yes. It increasea your testosterone and recovers your libido and energy (if you had that low). "I don't find the majority of women around me sufficiently attractive " Are you gay or maybe you live in a very bad place where girls are ugly or so stupid and boring that you wouldnt bang them even if they are good looking.
/r/TheRedPill06/02/19 05:12 PM
1

Capitalism has an infinitely better resource allocation because it can utilize a decentralized mass of knowledge that socialism, by definition does not have But for example, private companies have a very centralized decision hierarchy. It's because centralized decision is MORE efficient if you have the same goals. The problem with society as a whole is that different actors have different goals. "100% of associations and transactions occur voluntarily" Well, giving money because something is poi…
/r/TheRedPill27/11/18 02:48 PM
1

So how you define “waste” is just your subjective opinion. Well, that's the point. If you can't define "waste" you can't define efficiency. So there's no point in saying "competition is more efficient than central planification" as a general rule because it depends on a specific metric and context. In some metrics and context it will be true and false in others.
/r/TheRedPill04/10/18 02:06 PM
12

"He's a bully in a position of power. Not an Aplha." I don't see a contradiction there
/r/TheRedPill16/08/18 02:34 AM
1

Socialism doesnt have an efficient pricing system This is true. "so you get terrible resource allocation" But I'm not really sure capitalism has a much better resource allocation. For example, there's a lot of people in poverty, but a lot of resources are allocated to build iPhones, make advertisings for Coca Cola or whathever useless shit... poor people don't have money so there's no incentive to help them. A lot of resources are spent in really unnecessary stuff. Also there's no incentive to t…
/r/TheRedPill30/07/18 03:41 PM
1

Sure. If you have multiple companies fighting for the market you will have, for example, wasted resources in advertising, and duplicated effort to create the same things, resources dedicated to lobby, etc. I'm not saying this is always the case. Sometimes competition is good but sometimes it wastes resources. Is not always clear to me when one would be better than the other one. Other clear example of wasting resources is, for example, patent laws and creating stuff that can't be repaired or can…
/r/TheRedPill30/07/18 03:29 PM
1

Strong competition won't care about rules. Idealizing competition is stupid: why compete honestly when you can lobby for privileges, etc.
/r/TheRedPill30/06/18 06:25 AM
2

"Competition promotes growth, lower prices, profit, efficient allocation of resources, and raises the quality of life of everybody as equally as possible in the long run" I'm not against competition but you seem to forget all the bad about competition: waste of resources, corruption, violence, anarchy, etc. What raises quality of life is technology, not competition. Some competition is necessary. Full competition is anarchy, corruption and lose of efficience.
/r/TheRedPill30/06/18 06:21 AM
1

history has proven that individualist economic systems reduce income inequality more efficiently than collectivist systems. I think the opposite is true. Anyway I'm not a fan of 100% equality. But I like equality of opportunity. Which doesn't exists in capitalist societies. If you inherit millons you won't have equal opportunities with somebody that was born in a favela in Brazil. Is not that economic liberalism is wrong, but the actual implementations of it (inheritance, private education, etc.…
/r/TheRedPill05/02/18 07:05 PM
1

"it produces inequality" The ones that more have will obtain more, the ones that have less will obtain less, that's a cycle. For example, you can see wealth inequality graphs in the US or any other country... in general inequality is increasing in the world. Probably because -> inheritance.
/r/TheRedPill05/02/18 07:03 PM
2

Feminism and more abstract topics are brilliant from the point of view of the manipulator. Money and resources come and go, but gender, race, etc are forever. Yeah, I totally agree. Also money and income inequality is something real (try to eat in a restaurant without it) while race, gender, etc. "structural discrimination" is very subjetive and can't be proven, and if it can't be proven you can always claim that it exists as long as there are difference between groups of people, which will alwa…
/r/TheRedPill05/02/18 07:01 PM
3

I agree. I live in south america and there's also division made by politicians (surprisingly feminism IS a thing here so there's more division). What red pillers fail to notice is that feminism is stronger in first world societies and more connected and/or more educated societies It's just another form of power with the same aim: population domestication and monopoly over the money/resources.
/r/TheRedPill29/01/18 08:00 PM
3

2x as many people working means 2x as much money being made You are assuming that those people are being payed the same, but that's not the case. Probably is not HALF of the price but it will diminish it. The same that would happen if, for example, you allow all people to enter your country.
/r/TheRedPill29/01/18 07:55 PM
1

"This is why Collectivism is a logically inconsistent ideology and fails. Individualism not only works, but it is logically consistent. " I'm not really sure that "it works".. it produces inequality and is going in the direction of destroying the planet. But I agree collectivism has logical flaws. For example, it's clear than infividual rights is better than "group rights", which I see as insane but weirdly a lot of people are ok with that.
/r/TheRedPill10/01/18 05:11 PM
0

If the one doing that were a man feminist would say "gender violence" and other stupid shit ... Feminists are idiots.
/r/TheRedPill28/12/17 04:30 PM
1

Molested = sexual abuse? Or a comment in the street? (Not native english speaker)
/r/TheRedPill22/12/17 02:05 PM
74

Remove any women that uses that stupid hashtag from social media
/r/TheRedPill21/12/17 07:24 PM
2

I know the feeling of thinking you are obsolete but: You are not obsolete. Men provide far more value to society than women. But this value is either indirect (taxes) or is expected (protection) or can be abused (divorce). Just because women dont pay attention to you doesnt mean you are obsolete. It only means they are shallow and if they dont have any concerns they will waste their time in a life long popularity contest that we are not interested in.
/r/TheRedPill21/12/17 02:28 PM
3

There's no example in histort AFAIK of a society of women surviving by themselves. They literally need us.
/r/TheRedPill21/12/17 10:37 AM
1

I'm actually left leaning and I'm south american...
/r/TheRedPill20/12/17 01:24 PM
5

men hold the power and dominate both society and many industries due to historical social patriarchy and misogyny. Seriously? Men dominate industries because they work more to get status to get women. Women do NOT need status to get men, so they just don't waste their time building it unless they are really interested or they have weak egos. Also men are more interested in things vs women more interested in people. So industries with more $$ are dominated by men because... well, industries = mac…
/r/TheRedPill20/12/17 12:16 AM
7

We have laws against sexual harassment, but none for using your sexuality to your advantage. That's what I'm saying, they have an advantage and if they really would want to end this problem they would make it illegal or criminal to use sex to get a job, and to request sex for a job (which I guess already is illegal?).
/r/TheRedPill20/12/17 12:15 AM
5

I don't know. If you give money to a cop so he let you do X that is illegal, both are breaking the law. Even if you are powerful. If people really wanted to fix this they should criminalize ALL people involved in trading sex for movie roles or any other job.
/r/TheRedPill20/12/17 12:11 AM
5

But if everyone acted the way Weinstein did it would create an industry where the only way for a woman to get ahead was to be used for sex. You don't see anything wrong with that? There's some truth in your argument but if we would take it seriously BOTH persons who are trading sex for roles in movies should be prosecuted because they are creating an environment that is bad for the ones who are not trading sex.
/r/TheRedPill20/12/17 12:10 AM
17

they are wiping due process from all people in general All moral panics (terrorist, sexual violence, etc.) are used to destroy due process.
/r/TheRedPill19/12/17 04:45 PM
16

a subset of marxism, which has been created by banker I don't know much about marxism but I don't think Marx really liked bankers...
/r/TheRedPill19/12/17 04:41 PM
14

Unless "important people" start to be replaced by "important feminists.."
/r/TheRedPill19/12/17 04:35 PM
0

Lol I need examples plz :D
/r/TheRedPill17/12/17 10:00 PM
1

Please I need some examples.
/r/TheRedPill17/12/17 10:00 PM
1

GoingTheHardWay I think your comment has a lot of truth.
/r/TheRedPill16/12/17 01:39 AM
1

"no problem, just ignore reality and focus on yourself. Just LIFT BRO. Men's rights won't change anything" - common autistic advice in this forum.
/r/TheRedPill16/12/17 01:37 AM
5

I'm starting to think that "machismo" and men sexism to women is a natural defense against their having more empathy from society and their stupid but emotional arguments. I'm not saying that is good but maybe it exists/existed because they are more prone to this emotional manipulation than we are. It seems that just calling them crazy in a subtle way as your examples show might be better than arguing.
/r/TheRedPill15/12/17 02:23 AM
47

Being that they just aren’t naturally programmed that way, women don’t understand this. They also don't understand how male sexuality works and think that some normal things that we do are harassment, opression, etc. They think, for example, that if they go almost naked in the street we only look at them with desire because "patriarchy".
/r/TheRedPill14/12/17 03:09 PM
1

What else would you call someone who believe that women should have equal rights to men? Egalitarian?
/r/MensRights13/12/17 09:17 PM
2

If I was acused of something I didn't do by somebody I don't know, or that is so fucking obvious that I haven't done I'd open a YouTube channel and start showing how these fuckers are trying to destroy my life. Yeah, it's risk taking. But without risks there's no rewards.
/r/TheRedPill13/12/17 07:31 PM
3

If feminism really represents women, then you are right. If feminism don't represents women, then most women don't give a fuck about being misrepresented and about injustice to men, so that doesn't give them much credit either. I'd like to think there's another explanation. IDK. Maybe feminism is really good for politics and is being used by people with a lot of $$ to make progress on their agendas.
/r/TheRedPill11/12/17 09:30 PM
6

The 2-8% figure on false rape accusations isn't realistic as those numbers are only proven false IN COURT Usually a good question when they say this is how many are TRUE rape accusations? If they say (100% - 2-8%) they are lying and you can expose them easiliy. Note: have in hand the real percentage of conviction for rape acussations. I'm not american so I don't know what that number is. But it's probably something between 20-60%?
/r/TheRedPill11/12/17 03:52 PM
1

"American imperialism is back in the cards." What do you mean with "back in the cards"? (I'm not a good english speaker)
/r/TheRedPill10/12/17 04:23 AM
3

You might be right but maybe media don't pick red pill covert terms (like "snowflake".. well some media do) because there are not many that could go mainstream in a covert way. Snowflake is good bc it implies something without actually saying it: weakness, unique complex, etc.
/r/TheRedPill09/12/17 11:06 PM
6

You might be right but maybe media don't pick red pill covert terms (like "snowflake".. well some media do) because there are not many that could go mainstream in a covert way. Snowflake is good bc it implies something without actually saying it: weakness, unique complex, etc.
/r/TheRedPill09/12/17 11:06 PM
9

I totally agree with this post. Feminist and women in general are very good at framing discussion. If yoy discuss inside their frame you loose. If you discuss outside their frame with arguments, you loose too because arguments are less effective than labels.
/r/TheRedPill09/12/17 11:02 PM
1

You think every professional athlete got to where they're at by stomping on lesser talent? I don't disagree with that. But my point is that really few people want to be a professional athlete. Most of gym dudes just want to improve their bodies (either for aesthetics, health, strenght, etc.). Specifically if you are "lifting" for aesthetics, then more competition = bad. It means you will have to spend more time doing the same to have the same results because now being jacked will be the default.…
/r/TheRedPill06/12/17 07:40 PM
1

You sound as if competition is bad. Competition breeds greatness. Would you like to spend 2 aditional hs / day in the gym just because now everybody has a better body and now you don't really are an exception but barely the rule? Because it sounds like a waste of time and energy to me.
/r/TheRedPill06/12/17 07:17 PM
1

Women like men that will risk themselves and potentially benefit the tribe if they succeed. Male disposability. Women don't want to risk themselves. They want brave men to risk themselves and they "pay" them will sexual attraction. It's a path full of risks and rewards for a men. But not forget the "risk" part.
/r/TheRedPill04/12/17 11:26 AM
4

Do you think that narcissistic think they need to "self improve"? They are ALREADY great, why they would do that?
/r/TheRedPill02/12/17 10:11 AM
12

And that's how females can enforce their power. Either you are a harasser or you are a creep. So better you keep them happy. Anyway, better to be a creep IMHO.
/r/TheRedPill01/12/17 04:03 PM
4

they've been slapping my ass Maybe you should complain to HR and say you felt "harassed". Yeah, I know... we are not shit so we don't do that.
/r/TheRedPill01/12/17 04:00 PM
1

Well, if Scandinavia is capitalist, then almost the whole world is, including South America, Central America, Africa, Asia, etc.. A lot of places in which it doesn't seem to be working very well.
/r/TheRedPill30/11/17 07:54 PM
1

"Capitalist countries: high quality of life. Non-capitalist countries: shit hole." Best quality of life is in european countries with socialist policies.
/r/TheRedPill29/11/17 02:59 AM
2

"13: The root of the world’s problems is predatory capitalism." I agree. But posting this here among a bunch of americans who think their country is great because of "free market" believers will bring hate. They took the red pill but they are still living in The Matrix. Capitalism started with the America "discover".... that's when the rich started acumulating gold and resources: predating a whole continent.
/r/TheRedPill29/11/17 02:57 AM
8

They will still find a reason to be victims and keep complaining.
/r/TheRedPill27/11/17 02:27 PM
5

if they couldnt then they wouldnt be at the top of the mountain Do you know there's people that are born rich, right?
/r/TheRedPill19/10/17 03:51 PM
1

Start the day with 'Did u sleep well?' and end it with 'have a good night baby.' This is good material. Tell her about your problems and that you are weak right now. Be controlling and jealous. Let her lead. This too. Thanks!
/r/askTRP16/10/17 03:06 PM
1

Interesting. Seeing it in that way makes things clearer. Thanks!
/r/askTRP16/10/17 03:04 PM
1

Maybe the depressed rockstar only cares about himself and gives a fuck about the girls he fucks, and that's what they see.
/r/TheRedPill12/10/17 03:22 PM
13

I don't know this guy in particular, but all that "open borders" and feminism is marketing for the companies: It's cheaper to virtue signaling than to improve salaries. Virtue signaling is also good for marketing. Idiots believe these companies are "good". "Open borders" is good for the companies because they can decrease salaries (offer and demand rules) and maybe get better candidates. So maybe these nerds are beta, or maybe they are alpha, killing the competition and showing strength (look, I…
/r/TheRedPill06/10/17 02:09 PM
2

Y'all white men have oppressed POC and women for centuries The first is true (well, actually is true only for SOME nationalities of white people. Spanish people didn't commerce with black slaves AFAIK), the second is not true: both sexes had problems (e.g. men went to war IN ALL THE HISTORY OF HUMANITY, and women weren't able to do some jobs for a few centuries).
/r/TheRedPill16/08/17 02:51 PM
1

You can plant the seed of the doubt in his mind, saying the opposite of what you want to say. Hey, don't worry, is not that she's gonna fuck other guys or something, she looks like a very nice girl (?)
/r/TheRedPill12/08/17 09:56 PM
9

"Is Canada interested in jailing its own tax payers at all costs?" Maybe is interested in having a scared and docile population.
/r/TheRedPill21/06/17 04:50 PM
2

I don't live in Canada but I think you need to protest against this. It really affects your rights.
/r/TheRedPill21/06/17 04:48 PM
1

If I understand correctly, an atheist does NOT believe in god whie
/r/TheRedPill29/05/17 01:50 PM
1

Hahaha I agree even if that's not a good image of us.
/r/TheRedPill16/05/17 02:35 PM
2

At the end of the video there's a horrible woman terrified with the idea of being replaced by robots, using the usual excuse: "this will hurt real woman!".
/r/TheRedPill15/05/17 03:50 AM
4

"when I talk to a woman I hear a little voice that tells me this is wrong. That this can have bad consequences(getting laid with a woman)" Is not wrong but it can have bad consequences (e.g.: a baby, STDs, etc.).
/r/TheRedPill12/05/17 02:19 PM
6

USA culture is very individualistic, and the "lonely man who saves the world" is a common myth present in a lot of the culture (e.g. super heroes, etc.). Variations of that myth are in every culture but I find that movies, etc. coming from USA rely almost always on that. "making us think that independence from other men is what is masculine,when reality is that anything major done in this world is by groups of more than a few men who decided to make things go their way" Exactly. Individuals are …
/r/TheRedPill12/05/17 01:57 PM
2

Nobody "designed" the Matrix, it was built through evolution. Ginocentrism is an instinct. That instinct tells you something like this: women are fragile (this is true in a savage environment but not anymore in advanced societies) so let's protect them from their real and imaginary ("opression") problems, and anything it can hurt them (even telling them the truth). As there are not physical problems for women (like tigers and bears), now we "protect" them from opinions, the thruth, etc.
/r/askTRP05/05/17 08:09 PM
7

What if I ghost my wife of 15 years because I'm bored one day If she's able to do that, you should be able to do that. We are not arguing if that's moral or a good idea. That depends on you.
/r/TheRedPill11/04/17 06:15 PM
64

Yeah, that's the point, there won't. But they probably feel the same, e.g., when they date a rock musician and they KNOW he is with other girls.
/r/TheRedPill06/04/17 08:01 PM
1

Capitalism imposes artificial scarcity in a heirarchical fashion - those few at the top that control a majority of the wealth, in essence control the majority at the bottom, who control a minority of the wealth. 100% agree. The ones who say that "capitalism is moral".. WTF.. it is not. It could be fair if there was no inheritance. Then maybe capitalism could have something to do with meritocracy. There's no meritocracy between one who borns in poverty vs one who borns in a wealthy family, with p…
/r/TheRedPill05/04/17 05:54 PM
1

HOWEVER, no one is going to put a gun to your head and make you work It doesn't need it. You NEED to work to eat, have a house, etc.
/r/TheRedPill05/04/17 05:51 PM
1

It did not succeed because fundamentally there was no incentive to work hard other than at the barrel of a gun (or a gulag) Well, it took a feudal country in the second powerful country in the world in just 2 or 3 decades, so maybe you are just talking shit. There's a good reason URSS "failed": it lost the cold war, which was an economic / political an military "cold" war against basically the rest of the western world.
/r/TheRedPill05/04/17 05:49 PM
1

The only point to call identity politics "Cultural Marxism" is to demonize them (you associate it with something that is seem badly on your countries). If that works or not I don't know, but is not very accurate.
/r/TheRedPill05/04/17 05:45 PM
1

I've just read the first part. It has some sense, but "Cultural Marxism" only happens on... the most capitalistic states in the world. Why? Because it complements really well with capitalism. Identity politics are all identities but the one that really matters: class identities. Divide an conquer. We talk all the time about stupid or unexisting discrimination against race, sex, sexual orientation, etc. and we don't talk about the obvious most powerful discrimination ever: the ones who have money…
/r/TheRedPill05/04/17 05:42 PM
5

Converting most men, even natural alphas and non-betas, is an exercise in futility. I think the point is that they need to be interested in changing their lives, if not, anything is futile. If they complain but they don't act, they are not interested.
/r/TheRedPill03/04/17 06:43 PM
5

I'm curious about what's the point of rich people getting married (and screwed on divorces too). For example, TV and film actors... they really don't know it's dangerous? They really fall in love? I honestly doubt that's the reason... so we might be losing something. Maybe Brad Pitt really don't care loosing half of his assets because he has a lot, but IDK.
/r/TheRedPill31/03/17 03:22 PM
1

"Fidel killed almost everyone who was a potential threat" "Che Guevara used to kill children in front of their parents" Lol, where did you read that? On the propaganda machine of the media in your country?
/r/TheRedPill29/03/17 08:47 PM
0

I probably have a more sympathetic view of divorce than others here: I understand that principle of "opportunity cost", that a woman or man may be entitled to a certain amount of compensation for the time they've lost spending that they could have otherwise spent elsewhere. But why? It was her choice to marry him. Why is HE responsable for her choices? It doesn't makes much sense. If I decide to party all the weekends instead of studying, is my friend's fault that I lost some "opportunities" to …
/r/TheRedPill25/01/17 03:05 PM
1

The capitalist rulers of Cuba before Fidel, may have been corrupt, but the were not murdering rsocio-pathic leftists. Yes, they were murderers. Batista was a dictator and made people dissapear.
/r/TheRedPill23/01/17 03:57 PM
1

Marxism is just identity politics. Identity politics has a lot more to do with capitalism than with socialism. The classes that are pushing identity politics don't want economic equality, which is the main point of socialism.
/r/TheRedPill19/01/17 07:22 PM
5

Hello, I'm just guessing but if women are attracted to status and now a lot of women have more status than men, well... that should explain everything.
/r/TheRedPill09/01/17 02:26 PM
3

I highly doubt that Che Guevara would have anything at all in common with modern feminism As an Argentinian I totally agree with this. Somebody who takes a gun and fights against the most powerful country in the world and it's puppet tiranies has nothing to do with a movement that complaints all the time expecting somebody else will do the job for them. You need guts to take a gun and do a revolution risking your life (and dying) in the process. There's a good reason there never was feminist kil…
/r/TheRedPill20/12/16 03:08 PM
4

Totally agree. The only way to show the irrationality of these politics is to use them in our favour.
/r/TheRedPill02/12/16 08:37 PM
1

"Protesting is for bitches." Maybe but bitches are winning. We should learn one or two things of feminism. Also, the more the society is saturated from protestors from different groups, more people will see that identity politics are shit.
/r/TheRedPill02/12/16 08:35 PM
1

The state has never given a fuck about your rights Maybe but what do you loose protesting for getting something? Even if you don't finally get the law you wanted at least the issue gained visibility.
/r/TheRedPill30/11/16 01:17 PM
6

I'm curious about why Mexico need a free trade agreement more than USA. Usually that works better for the country with more industry: it sells manufactured goods while the poorer country sells primary stuff with no added value.
/r/TheRedPill11/11/16 05:10 PM
-1

88Willis88, you don't need to say EXACTLY what you think but you can (maybe) use powertalk to express what you think in a way it won't backfire. The SWJ uses victimization as a way to get what they want, we should do the same. MRA is the way to do this. SWJs can do what they want because there is not an opposing group that can claim the same victim mentality. It's the time for men to victimize themselves. The only way to fight without phyisically fighting. The moral fight. Yeah, it's pathetic to…
/r/TheRedPill04/11/16 03:25 PM
2

They help to visibilize men's problem. You don't need to be an MRA but if somebody is going to accomplish anything related with fixing some law unfair to men are them, not you.
/r/TheRedPill26/10/16 01:10 PM
3

What about institutional power? Like, being the president? It could be a 6th way of power..
/r/TheRedPill21/10/16 06:46 PM
1

Actually this forum is a way of meeting and I'm sure it has been helpful to a lot of people here. My suggestion is that meeting in person could better because when people see groups they tend to respect them more, and you can make useful contacts, get lawyer advice, etc. Also if the media sees a protest of 100.000 men would be harder to ridiculize than a protest of 100. Number matters. People take things more seriously when there are more people involved. "making changes that affect society thro…
/r/TheRedPill12/10/16 01:56 PM
2

The way to achieve actual change is more in an individual manner. Honestly I don't think that's true at all. Individuals can only change their tiny lives. Together they might change something bigger. Or at least show that there's a lot of people supporting X agenda. Also, meeting people with similar interests it's always good. In part (despite the stablishment support, of course) is what made feminism huge.
/r/TheRedPill11/10/16 11:02 PM
6

If I lived in USA I'd vote for Trump.
/r/TheRedPill06/10/16 02:22 PM
-5

You live in one of the most capitalistic countries in the world and you are afraid of socialism. Lol. Progressive left is intelligent capitalism. Is the way capitalism have to "have a human face" (we care about minorities, etc.) while the 1% stealing resources from all the population as always. So altruistic people will go fight racial, sexual discrimination "battles" but not economic discrimination which is obviously the most powerful one (and the one which actually exist.. if you have money yo…
/r/TheRedPill05/10/16 02:51 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter