TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

redditiasausagefest Archive

View 0 posts and 543 comments by redditiasausagefest on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Probably. Costa Ricans have a healthcare system that better protects their poor than Americans do, so even Costa Rica which is not a high-income nation, has a higher life expectancy than the US: https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.1521917112. When it's that bad, yeah, you should probably make radical changes.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/22 10:57 AM
1

Black Americans have the lowest life expectancy of any Americans... this is cognitive dissonance/c_pe, but I understand. It's not an easy thing to accept that you would likely live a longer and healthier life even in a black-majority country like Martinique than the US. It can't be easy, and knowing your background, I do understand and I can empathize.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/22 10:54 AM
1

I mean, the median life expectancy of the world is 72.6, Hong Kong's is 85. The median for the most industrialized nations is 81. America's is 4-5 years below first-world countries as a median. Largely because so many people there that die young and in middle age. Excerpt from the viral Atlantic piece: "But in 2021, young white Americans still died at three times the rate of the average resident of other peer nations, while young Black and Indigenous Americans died at rates five- and eightfold h…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/22 10:51 AM
1

I was born and raised in Canada. Today about 60% of my extended family lives in the US. There are huuuge chasms culturally between the two countries, it's especially noticeable as a black/multiracial family. I'm literally thankful everyday of my life that I did not grow up black in the United States.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/22 10:42 AM
1

LMAOOO really dude? The Vatican? Come on now 😂🤣
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/22 10:40 AM
1

Yes, I am, my grandfather fled Louisiana in 1921. My heritage is actually American, so it pains me to see what they've become or perhaps worse, never evolved out of.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/22 10:39 AM
1

The life expectancy in America is 79. Incorrect. Or if you prefer the CDC, still incorrect: https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/fastats/life-expectancy.htm
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/22 10:36 AM
1

And for me personally I don't care about any of the stuff you listed especially the military, I'd rather live in a country that doesn't have an early death crisis: https://www.theatlantic.com/health/archive/2022/07/us-life-span-mortality-rates/670591/ and doesn't kill women for no reason.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/22 10:29 AM
1

Lol preposterous, you're the only who cherry-picked the literal only western nation with an abortion ban as an example that having abortion bans is not a third-world practise.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/22 10:26 AM
1

America has a second-world life expectancy on par with other second-world countries like Poland and Russia, so their abortion laws make logically consistent sense in a way. In terms of median life expectancy, America's is closer to Mexico's than the most industrialized nations of the world. There is a sort of logic there tbh. The only states with first-world life expectancies of 80 or above are all blue states. Developing country values, developing country maternal mortality rates and laws. That…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/22 10:17 AM
1

I mean, it's literally the only country in the world with a first-world life expectancy of 80 or above that bans abortion. Yeah, as a woman, I connect quality of life to how many women a country allows to die early for no good reason lol, what's wrong with that? What's wrong with a generalized statement when the median life expectancy of a nation with abortion bans is around 73 e.g. third-world countries?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/22 10:14 AM
4

He's a giant ball of affection and cuddles who just makes me laugh. And he always texts me back right away, has since I first began talking to him. Just nice to have someone you can depend on.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/22 09:50 AM
1

By the way you should be aware that in all places that supposedly don't punish in cases where the life of the mother is at risk, in practise, doctors will let the woman bleed out and naturally expel rather than risk liability in breaking the law, and women become more likely to die. The United States is no exception: https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2022/07/abortion-ban-life-of-the-mother-exception/670582/ It's why even Northern Ireland decided to make abortion legal, because women with…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/22 09:39 AM
1

https://reproductiverights.org/maps/worlds-abortion-laws/ I'm not acting like, I'm referencing documented fact. "Mexico is more comparable to us as it doesn't punish it in case where the life of the mother is threatened and is different based on the state." That's what I said. America is more like Mexico than Europe or a first-world country on abortion.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/22 09:20 AM
1

Depends what they're picky about. Couldn't date a guy who's vegetarian or can't do seafood, I'm keto and my favourite restaurant is Red Lobster, we gotta eat there at least twice a year.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/22 09:17 AM
2

Not true? Maybe that's why dating got easier for me as I got older even though I'm childfree. Men still only cared about looks?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/22 09:12 AM
2

No, the only one that's a severe sausagefest is tinder because most guys haven't caught onto the fact that the women fled after tindernightmares.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/22 09:10 AM
2

"They prefer men who are emotionally available, good communicators, and share similar values." This is not blackpill. Men have control over whether they are easy to talk to, emotionally open, don't have retarded political views, these are all things that women vet men for when looking for a LTR.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/22 09:09 AM
3

And I don't see a problem with a woman who's been pumped and dumped by men just like you hiding her n-count and ending up as your wife down the line 🤷🏽‍♀️
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/22 09:01 AM
1

The chad-chssing meme is literally incel rhetoric, I always knew there was no difference between incels and red pillers.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/22 08:54 AM
1

That's actually the exact opposite of true, there is like only one country in western Europe that doesn't permit first-trimester abortion. There are no first-world countries outside of Malta that have the retarded Texas "heartbeat law" banning it at six weeks with no exceptions for rape or molested little girls. That's literally third-world country shit, El Salvador's law, and to make abortion regional instead of national is the Mexican model.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/22 08:52 AM
1

Neither, it's because of hairyness. Never been into the macho type personally, I like the sensitive type of boys. If you watched FBoy Island Season 2, my type is the exact 180 opposite of Mia's.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/22 03:15 AM
2

Yeah but not because of my height.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/22 03:10 AM
2

Most people on the subway are within +3 -3 inches of me.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/22 01:43 AM
1

Down here at 5'6"? Pretty normal I guess. Seems like most people are around my height, at least on the subway.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/22 01:41 AM
2

Fun fact! I learned today from online window shopping that "petite" women are 5'3" and under and "tall" women are 5'7 and over. Are most of us gals really between 5'4" and 5'6"?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/22 01:35 AM
1

I mean, it's what happened in El Salvador and America has third-world country laws now.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/22 10:27 PM
-1

Spoken like a beta bucks who can't imagine another way 🤷🏽‍♀️
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/22 08:44 PM
–

I believe they probably do a lot more than they did before, because guys who prefer white girls and start dating black girls start watching swirly porn. Don't ask me how I know. It's also in line with love map theory, which is where shoe fetishes come from: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lovemap
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/22 08:38 PM
–

Yeah 'cause a lot of them are racist. Well, now their teenage daughters unable to get abortions will probably just off themselves. They got more than they bargained for, I guess.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/22 08:28 PM
–

Almost nobody gets their "ideal," but many of us end up with our type 🙃
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/22 08:22 PM
–

Feminists did not appoint the inherently undemocratic supreme court. Trump did.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/22 08:20 PM
–

Okay then yes he is highly caught! Hahaha
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/22 07:23 PM
–

When my bf told me I make him a better man. That was pretty tear-inducing tbh
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/22 07:11 PM
–

I don't think his comment was racist or fascist in any way he's literally saying dumb women should reproduce more if they want to. Edit:would to women, damn autocorrect
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/22 07:09 PM
–

False. About the same amount of time for both, but first guy had to write me poetry first.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/22 07:06 PM
–

I noticed your flair changed from Chad chaser to Chad catcher, he was caught!! You're taken now? How long has it been? Congrats on catching your Chad!
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/22 07:06 PM
–

My man and I, if you combine our numbers together, were at 70 when we settled down (well, our version of settling down). Sure do love that crazy former manho 🥰
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/22 07:04 PM
1

I mean it's rich coming from someone who is open about their hypocrisy, claiming not wanting to get married is a positive thing to promote, but only if you're a man.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/22 07:03 PM
1

Men and women both have their reasons for avoiding marriage and they are all valid reasons. Women are not idiots for not wanting to get married in this day and age, given all the data we have about what happened to women who took a chance and rolled the dice on leave it to beaver lifestyle. We can see how that worked out for them. It's called observing your elders. It's called proper risk assessment.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/22 06:08 PM
2

Men do NOT make enough more money to pay alimony in 90% of marriages, the wage disparity is not large and the amount a woman receives in child support is extremely small, especially relative to modern-day costs of living. Perhaps there was a time when the risk was more worth it, but that day sure ain't today.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/22 06:05 PM
1

So the assets are only his even though the female workforce participation rate is anywhere from 68-82% depending on the country? Apparently only men's jobs count and women paying towards a mortgage are just what, picking their ass? When a large percentage of men think this exact way and do not give women credit for anything that they do or risk, what is the benefit to the woman in marrying them?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/22 05:58 PM
1

No, you are under the impression women get rich from divorce when they actually end up living in poverty, per every study ever done on the issue. Poverty is not a benefit to women, and that is what happens to women who get married if it doesn't work out. Not worth the risk for 99% of women, but keep focusing on that 1%.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/22 05:54 PM
1

Lol Yeah okay so just sell the house, woman! Then you and your two kids can live on top of each other in a one-bedroom apartment so you don't have to eat ramen and can live off your savings! See how favoured you are? 😏
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/22 05:46 PM
–

Not abnormal, you just sound young tbh.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/22 05:11 PM
0

Best size is 6.5 inches. My man is 7.5 and I can confirm that is too much.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/22 04:53 PM
3

How does having a stable personal life, a good relationship with your friends and a stable home life IRL make a woman a loser?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/22 03:40 PM
2

Boredom.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/22 03:36 PM
2

The average child support payment is $500 a month that's not going to cover a mortgage and women need more housing when they have custody of the kids. Basically your argument is that marriage benefits women as long as we ignore everything that happens during and after the marriage and the actual outcomes for the average woman. K.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/22 02:14 PM
3

There is very little casual sex that actually happens in the world. Most of the time at least one party is hoping for an actual ltr to develop after the encounter.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/22 02:10 PM
3

I'm of Caribbean-Canadian descent and he's of European-Canadian descent.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/22 12:18 PM
2

The mechanism by which they are less likely to get hired because of the assumption they will have children, for one: https://www.refinery29.com/en-gb/2018/05/198308/women-remove-wedding-ring-interview
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/22 11:41 AM
1

Women are idiots for not wanting an institution that actively benefits them in every way possible. Except to follow this logic requires us to shut our eyes to actual reality which shows that divorced women fare worse than never-married women across all metrics. So, you're right as long as we ignore the real world and follow your theory instead. I don't think women who don't want to get married are the idiots here.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/22 11:35 AM
2

My man is more of an ass man, and that's what I got extra of.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/22 10:39 AM
1

First of all, that's not true: https://www.fatherly.com/life/twenty-year-guide-divorce-risk Second of all, you implied that the longer the relationship goes on the worse it gets and yet you have the audacity to call women idiots for not wanting something that degrades over time per your own admission.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/22 10:37 AM
1

Because they are the youngest/newer couples. Is this supposed to be another one of your ringing endorsements for why women, but only women, who don't want to do this are stupid?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/22 03:06 AM
1

Marital dissatisfaction has nothing to do with divorce? Very little, yes. It is just a snapshot in time. If it was the most important thing, the couples who consistently report the highest marital satisfaction in America: https://www.psychologytoday.com/ca/blog/how-i-shapes-we/202112/what-age-are-couples-least-happy, https://www.marketwatch.com/story/women-and-men-reveal-the-financial-and-emotional-costs-of-their-affairs-2019-03-05, https://www.huffpost.com/entry/childless-couples-happier-kids-s…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/22 03:05 AM
–

Good for them, hope they don't have kids though.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/22 03:00 AM
1

No, its not the dishes This has nothing to do with actual divorce though. Technically childless couples report the highest marital satisfaction ratings, which doesn't translate to lower divorce risk (although if you live in England, it also doesn't translate to higher divorce risk). Sexual desire isn't the main impetus for marital intactness. I'd wager from the husband's side it's actually often just free surrogacy, childcare, cooking and maid service.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/22 02:58 AM
1

Exactly, and all 5 men who are married in their 20s have an infidelity rate of 10%, pulling down the average for all married men, who are substantially more likely to cheat on their wives.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/22 02:52 AM
2

We already discussed how men aren't the ones that cause the divorce. No, you concluded that. There are all kinds of things men can do to mitigate the risk of divorce: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-2196408/Dirty-dishes-divorces-Three-couples-split-cleaning-household-chores.html, https://m.timesofindia.com/home/science/dirty-dishes-drive-30-to-divorce/articleshow/16109269.cms, but they simply choose not to heed them. And zero benefits for the man, which is why men don't do it. The imp…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/22 02:51 AM
–

No, stay in your lane. Go bowling with the belching boys or some shit. Leave the eyeliner wearing emo boys to the feminist girls in their early 20s, please.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/22 02:39 AM
1

The men who are least likely to be married, 20-somethings, bring down the average for all men.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/22 02:33 AM
2

Marriage is the vehicle by which most women have babies: https://ifstudies.org/blog/no-ring-no-baby And women having babies is a risk to themselves both physiologically, economically, and psychologically: https://ifstudies.org/blog/does-having-children-make-people-happier-in-the-long-run. Women who don't get married don't get saddled with babies that they end up eating ramen noodles trying to feed in the event of a divorce caused by their husband's infidelity while they were pregnant with his ch…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/22 02:24 AM
1

So women with degrees are not the rich women now? Do you hear yourself?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/22 02:21 AM
3

I'm talking about its current form. Its current form is the exact same as it ever was once the baby comes along: https://theconversation.com/dual-earner-couples-share-the-housework-equally-until-the-first-baby-comes-41328
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/22 02:07 AM
1

I look at it the other way. It's only worth spitting out four kids and risk getting cheated on and ending up a single mom if you stand to get billions from the dude for rolling the dice. For working-class women with men of a similar station, it's not worth the risk.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/22 02:04 AM
1

while the opposite is true for rich women. Evidence for this is where? Education and income are positively correlated and the only women with a marriage rate above 70% have a Bachelor's degree or higher: https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2015/12/04/education-and-marriage/ft_15-12-4-college-marriage2/. Sounds like a load of BS to me. And there is no statistically significant wage gap between childless women and men: https://www.vox.com/2018/2/19/17018380/gender-wage-gap-childcare-penalty And …
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/22 02:02 AM
–

I am more of a tempura and teriyaki person, I don't really like sushi, but I like that you're trying new foods! Keep it up! 👍🏼👍🏼
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/22 01:53 AM
3

Because it's an institution that was literally made to benefit them. Lmaooo who are you kidding with this? It was made to benefit low-status men so they don't revolt. It's just a result of their lacking abilities. Mothers earn less despite having better credentials than non-mothers: https://theconversation.com/women-earn-less-after-they-have-kids-despite-strong-credentials-94013 They are held to higher punctuality standards and offered lower starting salaries than all other groups: https://theco…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/22 01:52 AM
2

Oh, is that why the highest earners are the only ones doing it anymore? 😏
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/22 01:45 AM
1

Women's inability to make money despite that is completely irrelevant. Women's inability, or mothers' inability, due to time constraints and discrimination? Women who didn't get married and pump out kids have more wealth than men: https://www.forbes.com/sites/carlieporterfield/2021/08/31/census-bureau-older-childless-women-make-more-money-in-better-health-than-male-counterparts/amp/
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/22 01:39 AM
2

I don't know what you wanted to show with this. Why are men's reasons for not wanting to get married valid and women's not despite the fact that women's risk of poverty after divorce is substantially higher than for men's and they experience no life expectancy boost from marriage? How do you rationalize this level of misogyny?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/22 01:34 AM
1

The difference in divorce initiation is 40% Where is that? In America, 69% of divorces are initated by women, down from 80% in the 80s, men are increasingly likely to abandon their aging wives in all countries. And the disparity in infidelity risk grows larger as the woman ages as well. It's only a 7% difference if we exclude the highest-risk group of men.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/22 01:31 AM
1

There isn't any mechanism of divorce that hinders women economically. Just lol. "Numerous empirical studies have demonstrated the economic consequences of divorce for men and women with and without children (e.g., Hoffman & Duncan, 1988; Holden & Smock, 1991; Kalmijn, 2005; Leopold & Kalmijn, 2016; Poortman, 2000; Tach & Eads, 2015). Men tend to experience little changes in their economic situation. They might be more likely to receive unemployment or disability benefits following divorce, but t…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/22 01:29 AM
0

It's 20% vs 13% a disparity that greatly carries with age, being pretty much equal in modern couples. Okay, so they are more than 30% likelier to cheat, noted. Except there is no evidence of that. Men's infidelity risk increases substantially with age, and begins to rise while the woman is pregnant with their child: https://www.bakadesuyo.com/2012/01/5-things-you-didnt-know-about-infidelity/
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/22 01:20 AM
1

Alimony is awarded in 10% of divorces: https://www.divorcemag.com/articles/percentage-of-men-awarded-spousal-support-increasing, so women should take on more housework so they can maybe get a slim shot at temporary support after infidelity leading to divorce, or they're stupid? Meanwhile, divorce makes them more likely to be impoverished than if they had never married?: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/jomf.12629
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/22 01:16 AM
–

Unexpectedly wholesome 🥰
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/22 01:12 AM
2

How does the UK not have no-fault divorce? No, it doesn't. Men and women have pretty similar cheating rates. Actually, men cheat about 30% more: https://www.theatlantic.com/national/archive/2013/07/wives-cheating-vs-men/313704/ In the ethnic groups with the highest divorce rates, the disparity (of men cheating more) is even greater.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/22 01:10 AM
2

That's just divorced from reality. There is no life expectancy difference between never-married women and married women. It is men who see a life expectancy advantage from getting married. Women see more housework from getting married: https://www.newsweek.com/study-boyfriends-outdo-husbands-housework-100089
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/22 01:06 AM
–

Not worldwide, in the UK men file about 40% of the time and that number has been increasing overtime: https://www.bbc.com/worklife/article/20220511-why-women-file-for-divorce-more-than-men When you look at who initiates the majority of extramarital affairs, it makes sense who initiates most divorces. Most divorces involved a cheating spouse: https://ifstudies.org/ifs-admin/resources/cheating3new-w640.png.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/22 01:02 AM
–

I just spoke to someone who invented his own alternative facts about the divorce rate increasing when it has been doing the opposite. The current state of marriage has nothing to do with it. They're just excuses. If you wouldn't get married unless the divorce rate was -4 and the bride was barely legal, you don't want to get married. Just own it. Wives are going to age regardless and you're not okay with that. So don't get married. Why does your not being okay with permanent monogamy and an aging…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/22 12:25 AM
–

Damn. That's sad 😔
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/22 12:07 AM
–

I mean, it's all over the place though how are they winning the argument? Marriage is bad and people shouldn't get married because divorce happens but people not getting married in huge numbers is a huge problem? That's not how you win an argument, lol
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/22 11:54 PM
–

Ahhh yes okay that definitely explains it.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/22 11:45 PM
–

Can someone please explain to me why men who don't want to get married personally express outrage that other people aren't getting married in high numbers like they used to? Like, how is this logically consistent?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/22 11:41 PM
1

You don't want to get married, and it's a serious problem that you are getting exactly what you want out of life? Why is that exactly?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/22 11:33 PM
1

It's a serious problem that people are getting married and having kids, or did you mean to say that they aren't? English, dude, English.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/22 11:29 PM
1

nothing u claimed has been proven by ur sources That is false, you just can't read data tables.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/22 11:22 PM
1

Look, as I said: it's not for everybody, and that's okay.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/22 11:19 PM
1

The numbers are literally there in the pdf. It's an 18% decline in divorce between 2006 and 2018, and it's attributed to the people marrying being more likely to be college-educated, and a rising age at first marriage (studies show the rate is lowest in America if you marry between 28 and 32). Just admit that you can't accept being wrong and go.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/22 11:18 PM
1

And I support that. I find that a lot of men who aren't suited to monogamy and can't love a woman who ages try and go back and rationalize why no one should get married, when the reality is that they just shouldn't. There's nothing wrong with people single, monogamy isn't for everybody, not everyone can truly love another person and be vulnerable in that way either. I'd much rather people who should be single stay single, people who should cohabit cohabit, and people who truly believe in marriag…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/22 11:16 PM
1

Lol like you acknowledge science that disagrees with the random stuff you pull out of your ass? The numbers come from the US census, but I also posted UK data. https://osf.io/preprints/socarxiv/h2sk6/
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/22 11:13 PM
1

And for the record I support the millennial trend towards low marriage rates. I think they go hand-in-hand with declining divorce rates. Way too many unsuitable people got married in the past.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/22 11:12 PM
1

By linking to the statistical data that proves that by comparing the risk of divorce at the exact same marital length for both cohorts. If divorce risk is highest in the first 4-8 years (which statistically it is in America; this varies for other nations, however), and the divorce rate in those earliest years are highly predictive of the 40-year-rate, which it is, even if there is a spike later, if you're coming from substantially lower rates, then the ultimate divorce rate is lower. I guess you…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/22 11:10 PM
1

I was aware of this data before coming into this conversation, that's why it's so easy to counter your false assertions with the data. I'm obviously more informed about this topic than you are. You keep making generalizations and you obviously hoped they would all just be accepted and not challenged with the actual facts.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/22 11:05 PM
1

Also not quite correct: https://www.fatherly.com/life/twenty-year-guide-divorce-risk.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/22 11:02 PM
1

Also, boomers are largely in their 60s and 70s now, FYI.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/22 10:51 PM
1

Yes, and I don't see how that's relevant. Those who are getting married are not more likely to be divorced, which is what you incorrectly stated. Those who are not comfortable with the risk of divorce are opting to not get married. Both trends are exactly as it should be.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/22 10:50 PM
2

That's not the same thing as comparing the actual couples who got married directly though, which is what my studies show. The divorce rate remains highest for the boomers, those are not new marriages for the most part. Also, it is behind a paywall.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/22 10:46 PM
1

Do you have a source for this? I have seen the opposite: https://www.goldbergjones-or.com/divorce/divorce-by-generation/#:~:text=As%20far%20as%20marriage%20and,at%20higher%20rates%20than%20ever, Also in the UK, same story: https://ifstudies.org/blog/why-is-divorce-declining-in-the-uk
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/22 10:43 PM
2

The premise of what you're saying is wrong because divorce has been declining for years, not increasing.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/22 10:40 PM
1

Not really relevant here anyway, it's very common to have long-term stable cohabitations where I live: https://ifstudies.org/blog/cohabitation-law-and-couple-behavior-in-canada. United States has long had higher marriage rates than us and conversely fewer kids growing up in 2-parent homes. The data I've seen about relationship outcomes is also not so clear cut as you say: https://ifstudies.org/ifs-admin/resources/table1nick-1-w640.png For women there's not really a statistically significant diff…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/22 10:37 PM
1

I mean, you can think that we never end up happy if you want. But just reads to me like a c_pe. I'm in a relationship with a great dude for 7 and a half years, he's a total cutie, and he also had a high "n-count" when we met at 29. My longest relationship at the time we met had been 3 and a half years his had been six months. It's also closed and monogamous, no cheating and generally no drama. Plenty of us get the exact happy ending that we want. I mean, if it makes you feel any better, he was l…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/22 10:29 PM
1

I don't really see how the position that retroactive jealousy is indefensible is logically inconsistent with monogamy.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/22 10:06 PM
1

I'm talking about the disproportionate way they mistreat their partners relative to men who are childfree. Examples: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/347574513_Fatherhood_Is_Associated_with_Increased_Infidelity_and_Moderates_the_Link_between_Relationship_Satisfaction_and_Infidelity, https://theconversation.com/dual-earner-couples-share-the-housework-equally-until-the-first-baby-comes-41328. The reasons you've listed are notably devoid of "devotion," "intimacy" and "love." They're simply …
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/22 08:01 PM
2

Ring pop woman checking in ✌🏽 Exactly! We're not all diamond ring desperate. You probably can't understand that just like we can't understand why you're obsessed with a woman's past sexual encounters or how fast they did or did not happen. 🤷🏽‍♀️
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/22 10:52 PM
1

He was yum.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/22 07:40 PM
2

My bf's whole family on his dad's side is short and among his immediate family he's the tallest at 5'8." His brother-in-law married his sister when she was 23 and he was 24, and she's 4'10 and a half and he's 5'3." They've been married over 10 years. His dad was 5'5" and married from the late 70s until his passing in April of this year (RIP). His equally short brothers are all still married to the same woman. Meanwhile, there are tall people on his mom's side (they're British), his uncle is tall…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/22 07:36 PM
2

Oh great. Now I feel guilty. I don't want you to be sad unless you're redpill or antichoice. Here, have a 🫂
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/22 07:30 PM
1

Yes the ones complaining here definitely tend to be that height or shorter. I think the issue is that they are below-average in several realms, of which height is just one of them.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/22 07:18 PM
0

Bro, my ex is 5'6", and was chad. His longest dry spell after a breakup was two weeks.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/22 07:12 PM
5

Andrew Tate is proof that men single well into their 30s are damaged goods, left on the shelf for a reason, abusive and incapable of engaging in healthy relationships or pair-bonding.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/22 07:03 PM
0

I feel the exact same way but the older I get the less inclined I am to judge swingers only because I realize that if you don't give people options, monogamy becomes a trap, and you get cheaters instead of people who would be happy swinging find each other. It's sort of like how literally nobody benefited from gay people being in the closet.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/22 06:26 PM
1

I do think people are aging better than before in general now, mostly because more and more often they don't have kids, people are more aware of skin cancer and sun safety, and smoking is banned indoors now.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/22 05:49 PM
2

I'm 36 and a 26-year-old is chasing me right now. I was getting frumpy but then I went keto so now I have my 29-year-old body back. Face was always young (I'm a nonsmoker, very light drinker, and black don't crack).
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/22 05:48 PM
1

That tells me rich men want relationships more than rich women? Does it though? Angela Merkel is in a relationship, Ina Garten has been married for 50 years, Mavis Leno since 1980, Oprah has been with Stedman since 1992, all are rich childless/childfree women. The school system would be a good example of extreme sexism. Is it though? Extreme sexism that produces mostly male graduates in engineering? Is it sexism that makes men more likely to take up trades than go to college? Are you sure about …
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/22 05:45 PM
2

And my bf and I were only together four months at that point, not 7 years with shared furniture and filing our taxes together.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/22 05:18 PM
2

For your information, this happened to me once before back in 2015 and I became friends with the guy to set him up with my friend since I knew he was her type, and she had a baby with him in spring 2021. That dude gets along pretty well with my bf.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/22 05:14 PM
1

That's cool, I didn't know you could hear how people sound over text. Neat trick.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/22 05:12 PM
1

I honestly thought you were younger.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/22 05:11 PM
2

Is 26 considered Gen Z? Can't believe I am being pursued by a 6'3" Gen Z 😭 this must be how Olivia Wilde felt when she met Harry Styles. But unlike her I won't be leaving my man of many years because I'm not a hoebag.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/22 05:04 PM
2

The problem is that people are not always aware of just how strong a preference is. Or they say it's just a preference because they want to leave the psychological back door open in case the 1 in 1,000 exception makes themself available to that person.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/22 04:43 PM
1

Lol
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/22 04:14 PM
1

Any man can get casual sex though, if he's not too picky about looks and makes the woman feel attractive and safe from being judged. So that's a poor metric because it includes every man.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/22 03:45 PM
1

Economic factors play a role as well but none of those things are harmful to anyone Huh? The economic factor of divorce is extremely likely to lead to the woman living in poverty in the long term. Women do count as "anyone" so on behalf of reality I'm going to have to disagree with you there. In fact those things benefit men LOL It benefits men: https://www.psychologytoday.com/ca/blog/living-single/202205/lonely-stressed-depressed-romantic-partner-may-not-help and women alike: https://www.newswe…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/22 03:23 PM
2

What is a chad, even? I feel like incels say a chad is any man currently getting sex who is not them.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/22 03:05 PM
1

Best you can do is tell the next woman what to look out for. Right. And I do, but I wonder if red pill men realize that they are also doing that and in some cases turning women off of serious relationships with men or marriage altogether. I mean, they claim to be anti-marriage so maybe this is their intended goal is to make men as a whole look unappealing to marry so women do not look for that white picket fence. Most understand that it’s a risk you have to take regardless of gender. No it's not…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/22 02:45 PM
1

How about child support/alimony/custody of your children??? Men who actually apply for custody are almost always awarded. Most men don't want full custody of their kids, they don't even contest it. Every divorced or separated man I know has the kids a few nights a week or on the weekends, and that is their preference so it doesn't impact their careers. Both don’t take much of an RMV there will always be a simp to pick up the pieces for women Then why are men so much more likely to remarry?? Birt…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/22 02:41 PM
2

How are they "choosing daddy government for their beta bucks needs" when women who have zero children make more than men? https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.forbes.com/sites/carlieporterfield/2021/08/31/census-bureau-older-childless-women-make-more-money-in-better-health-than-male-counterparts/amp/ They are beta bucks.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/22 02:36 PM
1

My question for you is by having zero empathy for the women who got screwed by taking up in a serious relationship (marriage, kids, or both), what incentive do you provide for the next generation of young single women to take the same chance on a guy? Do men even think about these things when they're opening their mouths and shitting on women who've been hurt by men? All you're teaching them is that men are never held accountable for anything, so be very wary of them.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/22 02:34 PM
1

Men have the same concerns but that doesn’t stop them Right, because they have higher sex drives and a lot less to lose. After a divorce they don't have to deal with full custody and their incomes bounce back after five years. For women it never recovers. Plus, men don't have to give birth, and their RMV is not as damaged by divorce they are more likely to find another partner. When you have substantially less to lose of course you're going to be more likely to go for it.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/22 02:32 PM
1

Or maybe they just don't think they're psychic? Like, it's very clear that if the man misbehaves, they will be blamed for his behaviour and she will have to choose between emotional abuse and poverty/single parenthood. Since these are the consequences of making the wrong choice/inability to predict the future and there is no empathy coming the woman's way if things go wrong, what incentive is there for her to choose at all? It's actually a sign of humility to admit you don't know everything and …
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/22 02:29 PM
3

They are second-world countries, not first-world. Russia has a lower PPP-adjusted GDP per capita than Bahamas does.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/22 02:14 PM
2

But mainly it’s because I said that women are at fault for not picking better So what do you think of the growing trend of women not choosing anyone? Can't be blamed for choosing the wrong man if you choose spinsterhood, right? 🤷🏽‍♀️
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/22 02:11 PM
1

Poland has a life expectancy of 77, that of a second-world country. They probably simply do not count the suicides of women experiencing unwanted pregnancies among their maternal mortality rate. Their suicide rate is quite high and rising. Interesting fact about Malta, but given the contempt for women shown by their government, I certainly do not blame the women there for being in the top 3 lowest fertility countries in the world.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/22 02:09 PM
3

I mean, black Americans die even younger than the rest, so that's really more of a self-own.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/22 01:00 PM
2

Well the other problem with unrestrained capitalism is that there are no limits to what you can promote and advertise. Like I couldn't believe the US government allowed aggressive marketing of opioids. Where I live it's not even legal to advertise cigarettes because little kids might see.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/22 12:16 PM
3

Are you my bf? Only reason I think maybe you don't is because he had other reasons as well for wanting to wait a bit. After too many failed attempts at a relationship where they had sex within the first two dates, he'd just grown weary of it and thought it might be wise to wait a bit to make sure we really liked each other first. The reasons here make perfect sense too though, and he's also childfree.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/22 11:21 AM
7

Length of life isn't the only possible measure of a life well lived. If your median life expectancy is low it means a lot of people are dying young and in middle age. A 50-year-old dying of alcoholism or opioids or a 21-year-old getting murdered by a gun did not have "a life well lived" this comment is industrial-grade copium, lmfao.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/22 09:39 AM
12

So you are making America great again by adopting Mexico's abortion laws? Cool cool. But yeah you're right, I'm powerless to stop it, because I don't live there, thank god. I live in a first-world country which like all the others that are not America has a median life expectancy over 80. America's is like shorter than Cuba's and now you're driving up your maternal mortality rate to drop it even more. Just 🤦‍♀️
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/22 09:28 AM
14

What? The top three countries for suicide in the world are all third-world countries, they are Lesotho, Guyana, Eswatini, the only first-world country that makes the top ten list is Korea: https://worldpopulationreview.com/country-rankings/suicide-rate-by-country, so that's objectively wrong. If you think the third-world is so great, why not just move to one of their countries? Why must you turn the United States into one of them?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/22 09:24 AM
1

No the real truth is you don't see their true metabolism until they're closer to 30. Your dude was too young when you married him I think.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/22 09:18 AM
19

"https://archive.ph/CBwKd One large medical recruiting firm said it recently had 20 obstetrician-gynecologists turn down positions in red states because of abortion laws. The reluctance extends beyond those interested in providing abortion care, as laws meant to protect a fetus could open doctors up to new liabilities or limit their ability to practice. … In another example, a physician contacted by phone by an AMN Healthcare recruiter trying to fill a post in an antiabortion state “simply said,…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/22 09:11 AM
2

I just watched season 2 of Fboy Island and saw men of all races getting picked by 3 hot chicks.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/22 04:19 PM
2

You're allowed to have standards, my guy.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/22 03:37 PM
1

Random aggro messages from you like this one you posted just yesterday, "Didn't see any post as I am reading it here. Also let me guess the woman is the narrator, and she will skimp out on where she acts like a fucking bitch and amplify all the exs misgivings. Yeah am gonna pass on your analysis."
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/22 03:35 PM
–

Interesting point 🤔 so perhaps UFC and Wimbledon tennis are the only true egalitarian sports which explains their differing viewership rankings and high ratings.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/22 03:29 PM
1

As does historical fact disagree with you: https://www.reuters.com/article/us-el-salvador-suicide-teens-idUSKCN0IW1YI20141112
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/22 03:13 PM
5

The analogy has nothing to do with my post, unless you're trying to make the point that the bar is on the floor for men and you don't need good genetics. In which case, point proven I guess.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/22 03:12 PM
1

K, so we can definitely confirm in your case that personality is why you are single.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/22 03:11 PM
3

Seems like something to do with not wanting to join any club that would have you as a member, which is a you issue, as opposed to a genetic issue. The solution would be therapy for self-esteem issues in that case.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/22 03:10 PM
1

As opposed to the 100% rejection rate for men who approached a random woman on the street asking for sex? It's not easy for any man when trying with a woman who doesn't know you.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/22 03:09 PM
1

Realistically, she is either committing suicide or having that incest baby, in which case taxpayers will pay for it.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/22 03:07 PM
0

I just have mad respect for men who don't have double standards. All 5 of them.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/22 03:05 PM
1

Look up the word "handicap" and get back to me. My point remains the same.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/22 03:04 PM
4

Ooof. Here you go, bro. 🫂 It's definitely going to be tougher, but not impossible. My bro-in-law is 5'3" and has been married since 24.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/22 03:03 PM
1

He would watch Amanda Nunes' matches with mad respect for her beast-like nature.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/22 03:02 PM
2

Median* It depends on the country in question. Here in Canada where I live, it's 5 feet 4 inches.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/22 02:59 PM
0

Hmmm I guess just one more way in which I am lucky to have a man who is not like "most" men.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/22 02:58 PM
1

Unless a man is below the median woman's height, it's unlikely to be a romantic handicap.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/22 02:57 PM
–

I think the point would be that people who enjoy watching sports should probably enjoy watching sports regardless of the gender of the person playing. Most sports fans are probably men, yes.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/22 02:53 PM
2

A ride and a hotel. You need money. Oh and Texas also makes it so your ride can be arrested for aiding and abetting. But, no gender-based oppression there right?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/22 02:52 PM
1

Can she though? If she's 14? She can't even legally work. I love how victims of molestation are "lazy" to you. Great character reveal lol
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/22 02:50 PM
–

I don't watch female sports, but the only sport my bf watches is UFC and he watches the men's and women's matches, so I'm not sure how it's an excuse if a man is into a particular sport why he wouldn't also watch women playing it tbh. My dad also likes tennis and watches men and women play tennis during Wimbledon.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/22 02:48 PM
6

I know a normal-looking guy with freakishly ugly teeth. Maybe his genetics are responsible for his teeth being hideous af, but it's not like he couldn't do anything about them, dentistry exists. Nevertheless, he is not a virgin.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/22 02:47 PM
–

This is a good example and fair point.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/22 02:43 PM
–

Unless you're a girl in Texas who is demanding to not have to carry a baby that was conceived from your uncle r@ping you.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/22 02:41 PM
–

Humility is a good and attractive trait to have in general, so that's unfortunate.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/22 02:32 PM
–

I'm not outing his weird kink lol but ggg is a phrase Dan Savage came up with that means "good, giving and game" which basically says we should at least try to meet our partners' sexual needs and be game within reason: https://www.psypost.org/2014/10/good-giving-game-research-confirms-dan-savages-sex-advice-works-28965. And try not to judge.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/22 02:30 PM
1

That is false. Women with children weigh more on average: https://www.washingtonpost.com/national/health-science/parenthood-not-leftover-pregnancy-pounds-may-cause-weight-problems/2017/02/13/db3dbcf2-eeec-11e6-9973-c5efb7ccfb0d_story.html And have bigger waists: https://www.parents.com/pregnancy/my-body/postpartum/what-motherhood-does-to-your-body/
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/22 02:28 PM
1

We are aware but our leaders refuse to do sanctions or hell, even just stop sending them free money. We have no power.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/22 02:06 PM
–

I mean, taking a low level of DHEA orally has been proven to return levels to normal in women taking oral contraceptives despite the fact that they retain extremely high levels of SHBG... so can't be that low.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/22 02:05 PM
–

Yes and no. Americans have a higher GDP than the median citizens of several other countries where the people report higher well-being as well as live longer. Not just Finland but also Costa Rica, by the way. If you're spending all your time working, you're not likely to be very happy, even if you are making more as a result.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/22 02:00 PM
–

Methinks his definition of radfem is probably "does not dislike women as much as me."
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/22 01:56 PM
1

Average-looking best friend.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/22 01:53 PM
–

I mean, yes. Thanks to his freak of an ex (she's Russian) he picked up a degenerate kink which I'm humouring because gotta be GGG 🙄 and also at least it doesn't involve another person, so there's that. The bar for men is truly on the floor tbh.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/22 01:52 PM
–

Think they hooked up. Will and Jada have slept with other people. They also publicly vowed to never divorce no matter what happens. Ah, breeder love. So romantic.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/22 01:51 PM
–

It could be this, I tend to think it's mothers coping with partners who don't help. They are trapped.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/22 01:44 PM
1

The only thing I settled on was finding a dude who is completely straightedge. I learned to live with liking beer. All other standards were met.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/22 03:49 PM
0

Lol awww sweetie. You didn't know that covenant marriage is for their benefit, not the woman's? That's why they're stumped they've all been taught all they have to do is have the woman submit to them and serve them. Bless your heart.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/22 03:47 PM
1

This was practise at Chippendales back in the day and the owner got charged for it. He also ended up being indicted in a murder, it's a really interesting case actually, if you ever get the chance check out the docuseries Curse of the Chippendales.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/22 03:45 PM
1

So haven't been together that long yet eh? That's cool.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/22 03:38 PM
1

Pretty sure that's illegal.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/22 03:36 PM
1

I prefer my pants without pockets because you don't get that mom jean bunching, it's sleek, fits to the body and has a tailored look. That being said I successfully found pants that do the same that had the pockets directly on the side of the pant instead of anywhere on the front. I even remember the name, they were called "the Kendall." I don't think feminism infantalizes women, but those women certainly do. They never consider consumer preferences by women themselves as a factor.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/22 03:25 PM
1

Invent a time machine to go back to the first month of fucking each other. Sexual habituation is a biological reality why is your libido still so high, aren't you tired of the same p####y all the time?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/22 02:41 PM
1

Since 21 on and off. I have to take them because I have fibroids which cause periods so heavy I develop anemia.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/22 02:32 PM
10

There are no advantages. Men are the only ones who benefit when women risk vaginal prolapse to give them a legacy. That's not a privilege.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/22 02:29 PM
2

The fabrics are see-through because we are buying fast fashion from China.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/22 02:24 PM
1

The red pillers want to talk about "the true nature of women" but will only talk about their own true nature when they're trying to justify why they deserve to be able to cheat on the mothers of their children, why it's their birthright as men, especially once their wives have "hit the wall." However, if you as a woman agree with them about "their true nature" and decide that women should stop getting married to or having kids with them then, or should just live it up in their prime and focus on…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/22 02:14 PM
1

There was also the mass Rape of the Sabines in Italy.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/22 02:09 PM
1

Awww 🥰
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/22 04:40 AM
1

It's a bop: https://youtu.be/1koGtPWh7tk Certified bop.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/22 04:00 AM
–

😫 I have been violated by words
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/22 06:22 PM
–

Teen pregnancy peaked in 1990, and homicide in 1991. Both under Gen X.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/22 04:00 PM
–

Can't dox myself.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/22 03:58 PM
–

My issue is that I sit alone in a showroom for 8 hours a day, leading to boredom and isolation. My personal life is just fine.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/22 03:42 PM
–

Gen X'ers were the ones most affected by lead poisoning actually: https://www.psychologytoday.com/ca/blog/night-sweats-and-delusions-grandeur/202203/the-lasting-harm-childhood-lead-exposure-gen-x Their collective IQ is 7 points below the rest of us as a result.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/22 03:41 PM
3

This strikes me as revisionist history. The sexes were not really allowed to socialize together as recently as the 40s and 50s. It was taboo. A man might approach a girl who was with her female friends and try to start something, and they would arrange to meet up either in secret or he would come to her home and ask to speak with her father before taking her out. Men and women socializing together wasn't really a norm until after the 1960s sexual revolution.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/22 03:38 PM
2

Guy #2 and I'm female.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/22 01:47 PM
1

Who hurt you, dude? Lol. No, he has opinions, he just doesn't shove them down everyone's throat. And they tend to be unproblematic/show respect for women and human rights.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/22 11:11 AM
2

But one of the things that makes him so loveable is his humility though
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/22 02:22 AM
5

I told my boyfriend that he's impossible as a person not to like and that every person who meets him likes him (all of which is true) and that he's the least polarizing person who has ever lived and that if someone doesn't like him that's a huge sign that they're the problem and the most recent time I was going on about how literally every person loves him he agreed with me 😫 am I gassing up his head too much??
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/22 01:53 AM
–

Q4M: Do men get off on showing off/making other men jealous of who their girlfriend is? Be honest.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/22 11:24 PM
–

You should definitely fap. More emissions decrease the odds of prostate cancer. Just try to use your imagination and don't use p0rn, if you can avoid it.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/22 10:33 PM
–

Ikr? 😂🤣☠️
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/22 09:33 PM
–

‘My wife goes to swingers parties and poses as a couple with my brother’ - Peak low self-esteem https://nypost.com/2022/08/02/my-wife-goes-to-swingers-parties-and-poses-as-a-couple-with-my-brother/
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/22 09:17 PM
2

Lol!!! 😂🤣 My bf and I are both 36, he can rest assured there's all kinds of people at the club because there's all kinds of clubs. He's just lame and boring it's no one's fault lol
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/22 09:11 PM
–

I think they're just mad that women have the option of dating men with common interests instead of them lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/22 08:39 PM
–

Definitely not.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/22 07:43 PM
1

People that are so blinded by gender based hate are a danger to others regardless of their sex. Yet we still see no radfem school shooters. Based on your sex but also your words. I could understand saying you just love your kid so much there's no one else above them, and I could imagine making the same statement about your spouse (I myself would have chosen the spouse). But I found it oddly telling that someone would draw a line based on the loved ones' age. Like, what? It was confusing for a se…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/22 07:28 PM
1

Yeah I usually take my bf with me to the club, I didn't last weekend only because he had to work at 8 the next morning, but he was there in spirit.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/22 07:18 PM
1

To whom exactly? I'm a woman. Statistically speaking your wife is at far greater risk having you in the house than she is from a random woman, and I think the fact that you'd choose to save her only until the kid can walk to the fridge and get its own food only affirms that lol
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/22 07:07 PM
1

Because you need the woman to do the childcare until the kid requires less care, right? Then she's expendable. /S
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/22 07:01 PM
1

This validated my childfreedom 👍🏼
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/22 06:55 PM
2

No kids 4 me.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/22 06:51 PM
2

I don't agree.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/22 06:50 PM
3

Teenagers are annoying af and most of the time they hate their parents anyway.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/22 06:47 PM
3

Just do.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/22 06:46 PM
1

Peace was found in both not talking to my mother, in finding love (7.5 happy years now), and in not giving in to the rampant pronatalism that pressures women to have kids even when it's clearly not in their interests to do so and often makes them profoundly unhappy. You're acknowledging me, but why say nothing to the man whose comment I was replying to? He's the one who is affirming that thought pattern, as is the fact that "Certain developmental stages in a marriage, including pregnancy and the…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/22 06:30 PM
1

Ime on my own sub (I can only speak for my own sub since I don't participate in any other female subs), usually the women get annoyed and downvote because the man will add an irrelevant point that centres the male experience, like just tone deaf. Like the guy who came in talking about child support, lmao. Did he really think any woman there would want to hear about how unfair child support is to men? Smh.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/22 05:11 PM
1

Yes and no. They may not want men posting there because of a fundamental disagreement about what constitutes a "good point." 😉 I have seen a man get upvoted in my sub, but it literally has only happened one time.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/22 05:06 PM
1

I mean I didn't say the men posting wouldn't get downvoted to hell in my sub, just that they do exist and not all of them are banned 🤣😂 Post at your own risk.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/22 05:05 PM
4

Oh maybe that explains why my boyfriend never bothered to ask or cared at all. He was a manhoor for several years in his mid-20s.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/22 04:44 PM
1

Okay so I don't know too many people with kids. The one couple I know with a young kid looked pretty happy when I went out to the burbs to visit them last month, but who knows day-to-day. But having said that the only people I know who have kids are high-income, so my friend group consists of middle-class and poor childfree people who party every weekend with a big group of friends and are living our best lives, and wealthy people who own a home and have a kid/s. Poor and working-class people wi…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/22 04:37 PM
1

I'm sorry but I don't agree. Everyone in my friend group is happy af and we are in our 30s. Most are attractive, but even the fat couple I know is having lots of fun (they make mad money though). This sounds like a you issue.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/22 04:35 PM
1

Millennials saw both and said fuck it I'm not doing it. As a Millennial, this is accurate hahaha. Common-law is about all the commitment I can muster, it's been 5 years common-law at this point, I don't see that changing. Zero desire for the white picket fence.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/22 03:51 PM
2

I mean, most marriages contain kids, so yeah they're probably not too happy. Having zero disposable income can tend to do that to a person.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/22 03:37 PM
1

The only true way to see is over a lifetime and that isn't how data works. That's true. Gray divorce is a huge thing. It's actually not, the numbers remain small but as ever, it's the boomers driving the numbers, they were lower for the Silents who are now dying off, and are lower also for the Gen X'ers immediately behind them. Boomers love their divorce, lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/22 03:34 PM
1

That's really sad. Tbh, I've only ever seen divorced men fare well (they are more likely to remarry for example), so I just didn't see the risk. Especially when studies show that their poverty after divorce goes away after 5 years but for divorced women it's chronic/permanent, their career never got back on track once they had kids and those don't stop existing just because they now are divorced. So it didn't look very high-risk to me, but that's not taking into account the social aspect you tou…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/22 03:32 PM
1

Also, divorce is trending lower here because marriage is. The less marriages there are the less divorces there naturally are. No, that's not the reason. The 10-year divorce rate and the 20-year divorce rate is trending lower for those who got married, it's the percentage from the people who got married where it's declining. Which is because of self-selection; the people who shouldn't get married are selecting out of it, naturally. That's not a bad thing. That's why I'm telling OP to just not bot…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/22 03:18 PM
1

I'm not trying to convince you to get married. I'm personally common-law. And to me that is an acceptable level of risk to undertake when the potential reward is a lifelong bond and true happiness. But I wouldn't give up my job or ruin my life and body risking poverty birthing and raising kids for a guy with odds like that, absolutely not. Men don't sacrifice their career or bodies so not really sure what they are risking tbh. But you do you.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/22 03:08 PM
3

What did you say? I mod a female-centred sub and men will sometimes whine that they were banned just for being men, while completely overlooking the fact that there are men who have managed to post without being banned because they did not immediately break one of the sub rules.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/22 03:03 PM
3

I can't lie, my opinion of Kansans went way, way up. I just assumed they were all rednecks.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/22 02:57 PM
1

This.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/22 11:22 AM
1

I don't disagree. But still it's an overall minority, 40% of marriages end in divorce here, but that's all marriages, not just first marriages. In America I believe it's only 60% of first marriages that succeed and then it's lower for subsequent marriages, although that was the 40-year rate for the boomers and divorce has been trending lower for Gen X and millennials.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/22 11:06 AM
8

I'm sorry but I'm gonna laugh so hard when your dude cheats on you while you're pregnant. You've got a rude awakening coming.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/22 03:18 AM
1

And, how many people find the right person the first time around? Why is this relevant? Also, I said as much myself, it's "most" if you are including the high failure rate for the very young. and then that ends within 7-10 years. Oh, you must be American. Where I live, marriages that end in divorce average 14 years. But that is a minority of marriages that end in divorce (all marriages, not just first marriages).
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/22 03:09 AM
2

You're expecting exclusive behavior from a non-exclusive partner. And they would never become my exclusive partner if they couldn't keep it in their pants for even a few weeks. Bad omen. The vast majority of relationships fail Because we're including the ones that happen before 25, where most of the failures occur. so you need to put in the work. In my experience in this past seven years and looking at my exes as well, it's fairly effortless when you find the right person, and they're even-tempe…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/22 03:03 AM
4

Hundreds of millions of people have been serial monogamists who nevertheless stayed with their person once they found them until the day they died. There is no logical reason I can't be one of them. It's not good odds if you're already failing at the "at a time" part like OP is, though.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/22 02:40 AM
2

Oh, that's what you mean. Monogamous in the biblical sense, lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/22 02:27 AM
4

Yeah, I've been monogamous for 7 and a half years. Make things up much?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/22 02:21 AM
2

You watching season 2? 2 more episodes, can't wait to see how this ends for Louise and Mia especially.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/22 01:41 AM
8

I'm saying man or woman if you behave this way it's only a matter of time until you're single again. You're not the monogamous type dude. If you want to try, by all means, but guarantee you'll end up single again/divorced. Realistically, she senses that too, and so she's not wrong to hold out and not trust you. Why not just be poly and find a woman who is poly?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/22 01:34 AM
10

As someone who was not official with my boyfriend for a month before we made things official, I think it'd be pretty nasty if I was out there fuckin' two dudes while we were getting to know each other. Highly doubt we'd still be together seven years later if that's the foot we were starting out on. Sorry but guys like that are not relationship material.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/22 01:19 AM
3

I think there are many reasons, but one of them is it's nice to see the Asian guy in the lead for once. F you, Bachelor franchise. It's nice to see f-boys turn into nice guys. It's nice to see objectively attractive dudes who are also sweet and caring and genuine. It's nice to see the bromances/unabashed bro-love. Nikki Glazer is just funny. It's nice to see a funny female comedian do her thing. Many, many reasons this show, irony of ironies, can restore your faith in humanity.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/22 01:13 AM
3

The show FBoy Island is strangely wholesome. Why is that?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/22 01:11 AM
18

So, you're not trustworthy and she senses it. That is why she won't have sex with you. She thinks you're unworthy, and it appears she is right.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/22 01:05 AM
–

Update on envelope note guy who came back and got his $20: he wants to go get lunch next week. He's still trying sigh
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/22 09:42 PM
2

I mean, my boyfriend doesn't have to be a provider, but I also don't have to deal with diapers, and I think that's a very fair deal. The vast majority of couples nowadays are dual-income, so providers are getting pretty rare, you have nothing to worry about.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/22 09:25 PM
1

So she's shallow for being single but you wanting to marry for money is not? Just lol at ppd dudes 🤣
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/22 09:13 PM
2

I straight up had to LOL at "women can dress less seriously." And there may be a hiring premium for women who are childless sure. But mothers face the most job discrimination of any group. The data is right there from Harvard, dude.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/22 09:11 PM
0

The majority of women with that kind of wealth are going to be in their 40s or above, are you open to kids that aren't biologically yours, or one of those men who like to shit on single moms?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/22 09:09 PM
–

The baggage could just be a difficulty with trusting people, which RP men can all relate to anyway.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/22 09:08 PM
1

We are 50% sit on the couch and watch the era of Peak TV. The other 50% of the time we are out partying, festival'ing and patio'ing with friends. We're both extroverts, but balanced extroverts.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/22 08:56 PM
–

No, they don't. All of society shits on mothers, to the point that "Mothers were 6 times less likely than childless women and 3.35 times less likely than childless men to be recommended for hire. Mothers were also held to higher punctuality standards than non-mothers." https://gap.hks.harvard.edu/getting-job-there-motherhood-penalty Even your comment reveals how much society shits on mothers, you don't even consider their parenting to be labour, lmfao. It's invisible labour, a thankless job.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/22 08:44 PM
0

The only reason the idea of kids sounds so awesome to you is because you're a man and you get all the fun parts with none of the responsibility: https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2019/09/190923155026.htm. If you could actually switch roles and you got stuck with the woman's role you would want an immediate refund. Or more likely you would become a "wine mom" and end up on antidepressants.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/22 08:40 PM
6

Yes, I agree. I have always felt deep down that breeder m*n don't really love their wives and are just using them for the eggs and free childcare, so it's really satisfying to see a man admit this. It's the only thing that explains their actual behaviour.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/22 08:37 PM
–

I'd say you're still doing OK. People thought I was crazy before when I said if I could be anything it's a gay white male, so this was very validating for me. lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/22 08:35 PM
–

Yeah but then she's probably gonna be old. Nobody wants to have to marry some saggy person for money, women didn't want that, why do you think they fought to earn their own?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/22 08:24 PM
–

I was almost 19 when I first had sex, I think it's very normal.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/22 08:08 PM
1

I don't think it's that rare. I think it's fairly typical for couples with 0 kids to have our dynamic. I'm pink-pilled because I think moms aren't getting the same deal I am, and like it or not, the data also shows this. The bias against mothers is huge, they literally exist just to get shit on by everyone from single men to employers and their husbands cheat on them more often too. She's happy now but just wait until the kids come along with this guy.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/22 08:00 PM
–

Also unintentionally hilarious: "As 2022 gallops along, we’re living through a perfect storm of factors leading to a decline in sexual activity among young people (with just a few exceptions, like middle-class white gay males)." Just Be White Gay Male
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/22 07:53 PM
–

Hot off the presses! "Why Are Young People Having Less Sex?" https://www.psychologytoday.com/ca/blog/sexual-intelligence/202208/why-are-young-people-having-less-sex Of note: "For example, the number of adults aged 18-24 reporting no intercourse in the previous year increased from 24% to 28% (similar changes were noted with oral and other kinds of sex). And adolescents reporting no masturbation or partner sex increased from 29% of men and 50% of women in 2009 to 43% men and 74% women in 2018."
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/22 07:52 PM
–

Probably the 120 IQ person because they have more disposable income and can afford to travel and eat out more. Like, what good is being "chad" if your job sucks ass and it's the best you can get?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/22 07:41 PM
–

Hey man congrats on your 34-lb weight loss.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/22 07:14 PM
–

He has kids?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/22 07:07 PM
1

For my part, I personally believe that this meta-analysis from the National Survey of Families and Households provides the most truth, it finds that "Parenthood is not associated with enhanced mental health since there is no type of parent who reports less depression than nonparents": https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://www.asanet.org/sites/default/files/savvy/images/journals/docs/pdf/jhsb/EvensonSimonJHSBDec05.pdf&ved=2ahUKEwic37-GtJb2AhU_FTQIHXSoCSgQFnoECBIQAQ&usg=AOvV…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/22 07:04 PM
1

I would also add that the sample size for the Penn State study is substantively larger than the one finding that women enjoy doing much more work.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/22 07:00 PM
2

This data, while certainly interesting, contradicts previous data when they stipulate that Women enjoyed childcare tasks more than men did and also reported a greater desire for responsibility for these tasks compared to men." For example, a Penn State study from 2019 found that Dads are often happier, less stressed and less tired than moms when taking care of kids, and researchers say these differences may come down to how and when childcare activities are split between parents. https://www.sci…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/22 06:57 PM
1

They do do half, before the babies come along: https://theconversation.com/dual-earner-couples-share-the-housework-equally-until-the-first-baby-comes-41328. Like, I give my boyfriend full credit, he does half of all the chores, he's awesome. But we are also unmarried and childfree, so we are statistically typical.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/22 06:45 PM
2

REALITY shows that todays fathers are doing wwaaayy more than the generation of fathers who raised them. Okay. No one is disputing that though, so why the angry rant? Doing more is great and commendable, but doesn't mean "doing half." And beyond that, your rage posting is like wanting a pat on the back for doing parenting - the obvious implication being that parenting sucks. Well, you're not going to find any pushback from me about that. I fully agree with you. That's why I'm glad I'm not a mom,…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/22 06:33 PM
1

I mean, since it's clearly what you want to hear, being a dad is a hard and thankless job too. Not sure why men do it either. There. Happy now?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/22 06:17 PM
0

Why would I do that? There is no possibility I would ever be able to be a dad. Again, I am talking about what I am personally glad to not be, which is a mother.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/22 06:13 PM
1

To be very honest, I'm not sure because I never got far enough along in the dating process with a child of divorce after that one ex-boyfriend to get this level of detail. I do sympathize as someone who is estranged from a psycho mom. The thing is, my biological dad was still worse, and may even be part of the reason she is psycho.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/22 06:03 PM
1

It may not be the hardest job, but I much prefer working 37.5 hours a week to the working mom's 98 hours: https://www.moms.com/working-mom-works-98-hours/amp/. I'll just leave it at that.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/22 06:01 PM
2

Home upkeep chores are sporadic/seasonal, dishes are everyday.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/22 05:43 PM
2

There is also substantiated data that men not doing enough dishes leads to divorce: https://www.theatlantic.com/family/archive/2018/04/doing-dishes-is-the-worst/557087/
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/22 05:42 PM
2

Men are doing more than ever. I never disputed that. It's just, in my opinion, not sufficient relative to the work that mothers have.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/22 05:41 PM
1

You say this but I've never seen a woman say they wished their man would do less around the house, anywhere, ever. they're not worse off then men. You're entitled to your opinion 🤷🏽‍♀️ It's certainly not going to change how I feel about the issue, which is relief and gratitude that I'm not a mom.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/22 05:34 PM
0

Because they are basically indentured servants, they are buried under a pile of laundry and get no free time to themselves.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/22 05:30 PM
0

I feel so sorry for moms, man. What a life.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/22 05:27 PM
–

Based on what metric? Spending power decreasing? Wages stagnating? Inflation? Or are you saying compared to women? I think currently men are still the majority of highest earners in households. They are contributing I think about 60% of the household income because women are also very likely to be full-time earners as well now. I haven't seen data that they are contributing the commensurate 40% of childcare and household chores, though. You got some citation for this? Yep. "As of 2012, mothers w…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/22 05:21 PM
–

They are also contributing far less of the household income, though. So shouldn't they be taking care of their kids, logically? Also of note, women are also spending more time with their kids than they did 40 years ago.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/22 05:13 PM
–

Love Jennifer!! Childfree queen! 👸🙌🏽
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/22 05:05 PM
1

It wasn't about parenthood for me, as I've always been childfree. It was about the behaviour of the man towards the woman in a relationship itself. There are lots of really bad intact marriages as it is where the woman stays together for the kids. If she couldn't even bear to do that, the guy was supremo garbage, or he abandoned the mother of his children (see: Donald Trump, Donald Trump Jr). I did date a guy from a divorced home when I was 21, it was my first foray into online dating, but when …
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/22 05:01 PM
–

Yeah, that's what I'm saying. It may disgust me viscerally but it would be hypocritical of me to openly judge the guys saying that. The problem for me is that divorces are almost always caused by the man being a POS, and it's a question of nature/nurture. What if the guy is genetically inclined to be a shitty husband or cheater like his dad? Because I don't have the answer to how much of behaviour is genetically determined, I avoided them altogether and stuck to guys whose dads were not complete…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/22 04:46 PM
1

Our money situation has recently changed (just in 2022) because I am attempting to save while also having currently high expenses for a number of reasons (having to pay my driving instructor ahead of my road test, having to purchase a new wardrobe of pants because I lost 26 pounds and my old pants no longer fit are two examples), so I am recently broke, and he recently (just in 2022) became a much higher earner thanks to bonuses, so while I am still fighting tooth and nail to keep things 50/50 l…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/22 04:43 PM
–

I missed that post, but it wouldn't have been right for me to comment because while my SO is a victim of SA (by both a female and later a male) and it was not a dealbreaker for me when he revealed early on the SA that happened at the hands of a female when he was 14, I wouldn't date a guy who came from a divorced or broken home, which is also something outside of the person's control, so it would be hypocritical for me to comment on this even though my visceral reaction to men saying that and th…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/22 04:35 PM
1

I like the trend.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/22 04:10 PM
1

No. High-N and promiscuous are not necessarily the same thing, they were always boyfriends, he's just the one where we never broke up. The trajectory was no different, only real difference is we got along really well from the jump and he remained the same person so we continued getting along, instead of him hiding a temper or hygiene issues (happened with two exes) or something where it was eventually the demise of the relationship.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/22 04:09 PM
2

I mean, that's what I was thinking? I didn't immediately say I can't accept it because I thought there may be a note inside the envelope or something and my curiosity got the better of me, but it turned out to be a $20 bill. Just got a text from him saying, "I had to shoot my shot. See you soon."
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/22 03:07 PM
2

😂🤣
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/22 03:06 PM
1

Bahaha I actually sit in a showroom, vast majority of the time I am completely alone!
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/22 02:52 PM
8

Dealing with an insanely awkward situation this morning. A guy who works in the building next door to my work left me a note with $20 inside for a coffee date, writing that I should "walk by slower." He wants to go on Sunday but I don't think my live-in boyfriend of 7 years would like that too much! I understand it takes courage for a guy to work up to shoot his shot, but the whole situation is so awkward. Like, I make eye contact with someone at that shop on my way to work I wish them good morn…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/22 02:45 PM
2

What on earth are you talking about? I'm a woman. Why would I need to lie to get laid? This is exactly what I meant by "a problem with emotional intelligence."
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/22 01:15 PM
2

Which is why it is not advice, once again. Just because a woman is stating an opinion here does not automatically designate it as advice. There seems to be a problem among some of the men here with emotional intelligence, or perhaps it's the medium, I don't know.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/22 01:03 PM
-1

My last ex and I broke up because he assaulted me. He was in a new relationship within three months. Did he fix his behaviour?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/22 01:00 PM
0

It's not advice, it's just a fact of dating that many women know.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/22 10:54 AM
1

0%. I don't segregate my friends by gender or sexual orientation. Everybody hangs out with everybody else.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/22 03:01 AM
-5

Lol Men do not always fix their behavioural issues prior to finding a partner. They just have to be able to hide their crazy for awhile (mouth shut ears open) and how to woo a woman. Then the psycho comes out later.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/22 02:58 AM
3

I am an elder millennial.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/22 06:35 PM
0

Lmaooo
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/22 06:27 PM
2

Sean Evans > Joe Rogan. By, like, a landslide.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/22 06:16 PM
1

Who here is watching FBoy Island? Any bets on Peter being an FBoy or not?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/22 10:10 PM
2

😁
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/22 09:16 PM
1

The high-fat foods she's eating are likely also breaded.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/22 08:00 PM
3

The issue is that loving belonging has nothing to do with eugenics. The woman can be in a loving relationship, with a man or a woman, and still choose not to breed.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/22 07:50 PM
5

What in the actual fuck?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/22 07:45 PM
2

Women are not breeding merchandise.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/22 07:43 PM
1

Uh-huh. And what pills are those?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/22 07:42 PM
1

We also have human-based evidence that it reduces severe mental illness: https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.psychologytoday.com/ca/blog/diagnosis-diet/202207/new-study-serious-mental-illness-improves-ketogenic-diet%3famp Satiety is a major obstacle in weight loss so a diet that induces greater feelings of fullness and fewer blood sugar crashes is nothing to be sniffed at.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/22 07:01 PM
1

It treats severe epilepsy because of its anti-inflammatory properties, it reduces inflammation in the body, that's likely also one of the mechanisms by which it induces longevity. The study was done on rats.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/22 06:58 PM
0

Keto induces longer lifespans in the same way that fasting does: https://nypost.com/2022/06/14/ketogenic-diet-may-increase-lifespan-new-study/. It also makes caloric restriction easier because of satiety. Ketones themselves actually do promote satiety.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/22 06:54 PM
2

As a late millennial, I started cooking so I could eat healthier and lose weight and it was way more expensive than Cheap Tuesday at KFC. Society punishes people who buy produce and organic and healthy foods with higher prices.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/22 06:40 PM
0

What I see when I look at her is carb and sugar addiction, and I am sympathetic. I hope she tries keto and gets off the sugar-crash treadmill.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/22 06:32 PM
2

It is true that we can never really be completely divorced from the impacts to cultural exposure and media, it's too pervasive and we've been marinating in it all our lives. And yes, I too think there's a large epigenetic or early-life exposure component when it comes to these things, they are malleable to a much larger degree than we realize. Regarding your point about sexuality being filled with contradiction, perverse tendencies, symbolist attraction and stubbornly resistant to social malleab…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/22 05:38 PM
1

Have you never met a happy single person before? I just cannot understand the alarmism.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/22 05:15 PM
0

I truly hope you grow up mentally and lose the chip on your shoulder. You literally have been presented with facts that you cannot dispute, so you downvote like a child. Most people pair off. It happens for the vast majority of people (including over 70% of US men) by age 35. The greater issue is not people pairing up monogamously, almost everyone does at some point. It's buyer's remorse when they do.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/22 03:38 PM
0

19 checks out with the way you think, so it was a fair assumption to make.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/22 03:35 PM
0

The rate of virginity is 27% for men and 29% for women. So no, women are obviously more religious.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/22 03:31 PM
1

That first chart ON YOUR LINK literally says "no sex in the past year" and it comes from the General Social Survey which takes their surveys periodically with tiny sample sizes. You don't even understand your own sources.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/22 03:30 PM
1

And that's rich you telling me to read the whole thing. Did you read the whole link showing that the rate of sexlessness is highest among religious singles who think premarital sex is wrong?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/22 03:28 PM
1

The numbers are from the General Social Survey, it is literally the same source as this one: https://ifstudies.org/blog/more-faith-less-sex-why-are-so-many-unmarried-young-adults-not-having-sex that you disputed because it showed women's number was higher in another year.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/22 03:26 PM
0

And it's rich that you are now posting a chart about just not having had sex in the past year moments after you said that dry spells don't matter when it was revealed women's numbers were higher in a more recent poll from the exact same source. So I guess their data only counts when it feeds your victim complex? Lmfao
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/22 03:21 PM
0

Did you not say you're 19 years old? I assumed the 192 was a typo alluding to that.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/22 03:14 PM
2

Poor countries have better social programs than America in some cases: https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.1521917112
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/22 03:13 PM
1

Exactly as I expected. You'll figure it out eventually. 🙄 One day you'll get more monogamy than you as a man want or can handle, and then you'll complain about that too.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/22 03:10 PM
0

Young female virginity is also on the rise. 27 percent of men and 29 percent of women say they have never had a sexual encounter. https://abcnews.go.com/blogs/lifestyle/2011/12/the-o-factor-virginity-on-the-rise-studies-show-2 Like I said, you're young, you're in the midst of dating which has always been hard including for us over 30s, you have a victim complex, you don't get how the world works, but you think you know everything.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/22 03:08 PM
0

How old are you?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/22 03:03 PM
0

It starts with men marrying at age 26 in the 1800s. The 1950s were anomalous. Edit: lol at you downvoting facts you don't like. So childish.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/22 03:02 PM
0

That's one bit of data, alongside your interpretation. This uses the same source, the GSS, and says that young women now have higher rates of virginity than young men: https://ifstudies.org/blog/more-faith-less-sex-why-are-so-many-unmarried-young-adults-not-having-sex "Whether pooled or not, it seems like most of the increase in sexlessness among never married under-35s has been among those who say premarital sex is at least sometimes wrong. In other words, much of the rise in sexlessness has be…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/22 03:00 PM
0

All this really shows is that the age gap between spouses has been shrinking. It has only significantly increased for women, not for men.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/22 02:54 PM
0

40% of existing couples met online, also according to Pew Research. I get that you have opinions, but they have no basis in reality. They're just based on your perception, and very likely coming from a victim complex. I'm 36 and so is my partner, we've been together 7 and a half years, we met on tinder when we were both 29. Very common and typical nowadays for 30+ couples to have met online. People of both genders tend to date with more intent when they pass their mid-20s. You're probably not ev…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/22 02:47 PM
1

Since those 30+ people very likely git married way before reaching 30 which is not the case for current youth. Where is your evidence for this? The Pew data suggests that the majority of these unions are forming in the late 20s to early 30s. No offense, but you really can't interpret data well at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/22 02:43 PM
0

They will date and get older and a vast majority will find someone eventually and settle down, and then 1 in 3 of the fathers and 1 in 6 of the non-fathers will cheat. Same as it ever was, really. Obviously, some young men are impatient, some want harems that they cannot have, just like some young men are violent. That's never going to change. Same as it ever was.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/22 02:39 PM
1

I said 73% of men over the age of 30 are in relationships, and it's right there in the link. I cannot be responsible for your reading comprehension issues. A majority of people eventually form relationships, and of that majority, men are more likely to struggle with monogamy. The current system IS monogamy. If it's not working for the majority of people, I don't know what to tell you.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/22 02:35 PM
0

Sources are self-reporting from men: https://www.pewresearch.org/social-trends/2020/08/20/a-profile-of-single-americans/#:~:text=While%20about%20three%2Din%2Dten,varies%20widely%20across%20demographic%20groups. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/347574513_Fatherhood_Is_Associated_with_Increased_Infidelity_and_Moderates_the_Link_between_Relationship_Satisfaction_and_Infidelity And there is also zero statistical proof that "nobody wants to be with" divorced men. They are more likely to remar…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/22 02:27 PM
2

73% of men 30 and above are in relationships, so even that is objectively wrong. Like, we are never going to have a society where everyone is taken. What we have is a society where most people are, and here still, 1 in every 3 fathers cheats on the mother of their child. Perhaps it's actually that the current system of monogamy doesn't work for the majority of people, particularly men.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/22 02:21 PM
2

Medicare is a luxury poor countries don't have. Actually, Cuba and Costa Rica both have far more comprehensive Medicare than the USA does.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/22 02:10 PM
3

You say the current system isn't working out for anyone, yet you are happily married. So you are excluding yourself from this assessment? Finding the right person is a bumpy road. It's all the more gratifying when it happens.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/22 02:04 PM
2

73% of US men over 30 are in a relationship with someone, how much more monogamy do we need? That's not widespread enough? Considering the rate of infidelity, why the assumption that every male is even well-suited for that? It's obviously not the case.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/22 01:59 PM
1

No. Chris Pratt has been tied to white supremacy numerous times in recent years, the most recent time was a few months ago: https://www.wdrb.com/news/national/chris-pratt-called-a-white-supremacist-over-gadsden-flag-t-shirt/article_a592815e-a8b8-11e9-9bf3-af42933b3063.html https://thebrag.com/chris-pratt-seen-wearing-hat-supporting-white-supremacist-group-three-percenters/
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/22 01:35 PM
1

Your comment definitely provides a lot to think about. I think there is a lot of plain and painful truth in what you're saying (with respect to attraction being influenced by psychological manipulation and the media), and the juxtaposition between what is seen as sexually desirable and marriageable. I cannot deny the larger nuances mentioned here. Who people allow themselves to admit or express attraction to obviously has a cultural component. With that being said, I do think it also does not ta…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/22 01:32 PM
1

He is indeed! Is he considered a sex symbol? I wasn't sure given his former physique and well, I think he recently got cancelled for being a white supremacist. Maybe this is the sort of thing casting directors are trying to avoid. 😬😬😬
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/22 08:49 AM
1

Hahaha! That's hilarious. So is it only African-Americans who have noticed/cared that all their leading heartthrob actors are foreign? Hispanic and white Americans are just totally cool with it, huh? And I love the irony that I had to connect to a VPN in order to watch that video because the uploader did not make it available in my country 😁
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/22 08:26 AM
2

Watching The Gray Man, it occurred to me that basically every male Hollywood sex symbol at the moment is British, Canadian or Australian with the exception of Captain America himself, which they wouldn't dare... Two British Spidermen in a row is not bothersome to American audiences? Is patriotism not much of a thing there? Edit: Actually, the only hubbub about this I can recall hearing about is when African-American audiences were upset that Daniel Kaluuya was cast to play an ADOS (American Desc…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/22 07:52 AM
1

It's basically just screenshots of straight men shitting on and saying derogatory things about women, which after all is the pastime for many of them. They just bring receipt after receipt after receipt, and let the evidence (many men being single is a good thing, right and just) speak for itself.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/22 09:10 PM
1

As a woman without a moderate n, what does that even accomplish? I mean, all it would do is make me gravitate towards higher-N men who are less likely to judge me. It's not like I can unfuck any exes. Incidentally, my man also has a high N, so all is right in the world.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/22 08:59 PM
1

I think there's a fb group called "Do straight men even like women?" and it's pretty obvious the answer is no. That's one reason I'm not too worried when they don't find partners. Spend time around people you actually like. You're not going to have a libido forever, so leave that poor girl alone.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/22 08:55 PM
1

Women are not automatically warm and welcoming to each other, wtf? Childfree women and mothers are basically segregated. It's cursory politeness, not genuine camaraderie you're seeing most of the time.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/22 08:42 PM
1

This is a bit disingenuous though because postmodernism is the whole reason gay people are even acknowledged as existing in the first place. Before that you may very well have wanted to fuck them, but would have been allowed to admit that and would have been forced to remain in the closet. That's not to say we don't still have a long way to go and can't improve in our attitudes.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/22 05:15 PM
1

Lmao
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/22 05:11 PM
3

A comment by u/purplish_possum got me thinking about looks as it relates to individuals and couples. I think that there are some people who are so attractive there is a near-consensus on their looks and they obliterate any mention of one's "type." Let's call these the hard 10s. But then there is the mushy middle, and there is a lot of subjectivity here, especially for women. Like, in the 5-8 midrange, your average people, one person's average may be ugly to another person, where one person finds…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/22 03:21 PM
1

Whoops, Scott Foley is old! Damn, he looks good for his age.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/22 03:17 PM
2

Sounds like we don't need to tell you to not respond and run in the other direction from that one. 🚩🚩🚩
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/22 03:16 PM
1

May I ask you a question? Why are you so bitter? Who hurt you?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/22 03:05 PM
3

This sub focuses on sex, dating and relationships. Some are here to discuss sex, some to discuss dating (and how to get more sex when dating), and some are here to discuss relationships. There is overlap, of course, but we all have a vested interest in one of those 3 things moreso than the others, I think.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/22 03:03 PM
1

Reddit overall is a sausagefest.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/22 03:02 PM
7

I don't understand how being nice to strangers is supposed to make up for the fact that you treat your own family like trash? One doesn't cancel out the other.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/22 03:01 PM
1

My mom is a psycho, don't know my biological father since I was 7, stepdad was normal.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/22 02:23 PM
1

He's a toad.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/22 02:22 PM
1

Well, if it makes you feel any better, James McAvoy divorced his 8-years-older wife. Though he is now with a woman his exact same age.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/22 01:51 PM
2

Yesterday I posted a list of boomer power couples who are still married/together after many years in response to a claim that "Hollywood marriages never last." But if I had been allowed to include Xennials and millennial marriages the list would have been much longer even, and would include hunks like Tom Hardy, Charlie Hunnam, Ryan Gosling, Dan Stevens, Jamie Dornan, Scott Foley, Boris Kodjoe, Freddie Prinze Jr. Amy Acker and James Carpinello have been married since 2003, same with Paul Bettany…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/22 01:31 PM
2

No, I haven't told my partner anything about sexual exploits. He liked to share his with me though when we first started dating, lmao. He's an open book. I found even his self-incriminating honesty attractive. He has no fear of the cringe.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/22 01:18 PM
1

Women also exist who are turned off by 2 years older than her. Ask me how I know.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/22 01:15 PM
1

Loads of foreplay means it's working. This is an AI? Maybe there IS hope.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/22 01:14 PM
1

Right-wing women are just racists like their men. They also don't want to work.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/22 01:12 PM
1

That's... Objectively not true: https://www.economist.com/international/2018/11/24/suicide-is-declining-almost-everywhere No offense dude but you are like the very personification of toxic masculinity. To say that depression isn't real is just... wow.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/22 01:10 PM
1

I have to be honest, I was not expecting an anti-Lindsey Stirling remark, she has to be at least superficially the least offensive celebrity out there next to like Regis Philbin or something, lmao. But absolutely, women play a role in promulgating the culture of toxic masculinity and latent homophobia too.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/22 05:49 AM
1

You also make it sound like men should just "hold their shit together" and not acknowledge their feelings or depression. You do know they could always, I dunno, treat it?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/22 05:45 AM
2

You seem to be condoning it, and saying that just because men have traditionally exhibited a behaviour more commonly than women, that automatically means the behaviour in question cannot be toxic and discouraged. No.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/22 05:13 AM
1

This was both thought-provoking as well as very sad to think about. I want to believe we can dismantle the systems that stigmatize normal and healthy behaviour in males, and the looking down on anything that could be perceived as feminine as being a bad thing, but I am really not an optimist, I don't see fundamental or structural changes happening in society because my fear is that all of this bigotry has a biological component, I don't have a lot of affection for raw human nature.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/22 05:04 AM
3

By this logic, men beating up smaller men and drinking themselves to death as an outlet for their emotions must be healthy male behaviour because all male behaviour is. 🙄
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/22 04:53 AM
3

I mean, I gotta be honest: I would peace out, but it's not because of the vasectomy, it's because you only want casual. Just because I never wanted kids didn't mean I didn't want a committed relationship. A vasectomy always makes a man more attractive to me.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/22 04:17 AM
2

I have recently come to the conclusion that homophobia is the root of toxic masculinity. The whole phenomenon of the "no homo" thing. What would happen if men as a whole simply were not worried about doing things that are likely to be good for them because "that's gay?" Probably less suicide.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/22 04:11 AM
2

Wouldn't recommend it, honestly. Maybe Reddit but not FB and Instagram.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/22 12:41 AM
1

This makes a lot of sense to me. Like, if they get along with the woman/have common interests and they're not, like, nauseous when they see them naked, then that's their main priority: being able to get along, mutual trust, as long as the minimum threshold for attractiveness is met.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/22 12:34 AM
1

I'm not even sure what to say here, honestly. Are you saying that slender early-20s women in the prime of their fertility are only attractive to men if they are also blonde?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/22 12:22 AM
1

I'm aware that Leo exists lol, he and Robin Thicke are the only men I can think of that are Gen X or younger that have significant age gaps with their partners. Again, I said most famous men for a reason. Okay, so we've already established your belief that they want to date women with significant age gaps, but then that's still not really answering my question, which was why don't they then. I'm looking for reasons, you're just denying that it is even uncommon. It's also not true that "no Hollyw…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/22 12:01 AM
1

I think the "status is more important to famous men" thing holds a lot more credibility than this outlandish claim. I mean, unless we're also to believe that Ben Affleck could not have found an attractive younger woman willing to date him. Given that he recently dated Ana De Armas, that is obviously patently false, but given that she dumped him, then we could perhaps speculate that when it comes to the matter of marriage, something lasting, he could have had young and beautiful, or famous and be…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/22 11:46 PM
1

Um, is the claim you're making here that Jeff Bezos could not find a young attractive woman willing to date him? Point taken about status being important to famous men, though.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/22 11:36 PM
1

My understanding of the history of the banning (and heavy police monitoring for those that remained) of incel forums is that it happened from pretty much all platforms simultaneously after the second mass murder. But I agree that that could stand as an example of "they amplify hate and shouldn't be encouraged."
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/22 11:33 PM
1

In fairness, I did say most. I don't doubt that it was more common in Hefner's time (he's been dead for 10 years and he wasn't young when he died), but if age gaps have reduced in marriages among even the famous, are there primarily social reasons for it or are the women adjacent to these men just staying hotter for longer nowadays? Fwiw, Bezos is divorced and Sanchez is in fact the exact same age as his ex-wife. It's also Affleck's second marriage.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/22 11:25 PM
0

Isn't it though? At least after a few weeks into dating.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/22 11:18 PM
2

All the studies and as the red pillers are constantly reminding us, seem to say that men want younger, even much younger, women. So why does it seem like most of the most-famous men just leverage their fame to attract the most attractive women in their own age group that exist? Is it a fear of social sanctions or do men really not care as long as the woman is hot? Or is it just the marriage of like intellectual compatibility/stuff in common with attraction? Or is it a status thing? Like there is…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/22 11:07 PM
5

Yes, he is quite cute. But I'm not sure what part of "tinder is 75-90% male" is not getting through to single men in general.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/22 10:56 PM
2

That's an interesting point, about the nature of algorithms 🤔
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/22 10:33 PM
1

For real though 😍
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/22 10:27 PM
1

To play Devil's Advocate here, does everyone's opinion inherently have value? Does a black person, to give an example, need to have their views and perceptions of slavery being bad regularly challenged, are they stagnating in growth if they refuse to listen to a lecture about why slavery is natural and morally neutral? This argument lies on the fundamental premise that all views have ineherently equal weight, or that exposure to certain views cannot be psychologically harmful and inhibiting to a…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/22 10:23 PM
1

Q4All: Do you think having safe spaces (or echo chambers depending on where you stand on the issue of soft segregation) where people can "vent" their frustrations about any particular group can be ultimately cathartic and healthy, or unhealthy and amplifies hate? Or does it depend on the degree or moderation of the community?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/22 09:59 PM
2

It would be cool but can't ask for that because it'd be hypocritical considering I do it myself, though far more rarely than any man, I think. It's not the kind of thing anyone should ever be proud of, it's like buying clothes from Shein.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/22 09:36 PM
0

10/10 for being Canadian.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/22 09:29 PM
2

It's a cultural problem and the solution is to change the culture.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/22 09:27 PM
2

I mean, it's not a job I would want, that's for sure. Childcare workers are definitely not paid enough imo.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/22 09:25 PM
2

With my boyfriend it happened around date 5 or 6.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/22 09:24 PM
3

"I'm like Stone Cold Steve Austin. I put homophobes in coffins." Just keep finding great Idles lyrics. They're like a bottomless well.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/22 09:21 PM
2

Men are told not to talk to anyone because they have to be stoic and seeking out help or just asking your friend to hug you is "feminine behaviour." That is the essence of toxic masculinity, it harms men too.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/22 09:20 PM
2

I honestly think the ones who are little kids today will have to share 1-bedroom apartments with 4 other people by the time they get to my age.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/22 07:13 PM
1

Yes. Used to be just childfree and then I stopped and looked around at the world.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/22 07:10 PM
1

My question is why would you want to be? Just thinking to yourself how you're sick of being able to laugh and not pee a little?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/22 07:08 PM
1

If you couldn't see my face, yeah, absolutely.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/22 07:07 PM
1

I have such a strong aversion to seeing a man engaged in fathering or father-like behaviour, it's like Instant Sahara for me. There is nothing about men who are fathers that appeals to me sexually. I wanted a loyal, nurturing, sensitive, egalitarian and extroverted man who had at least somewhat of an aversion to raising kids/fatherhood. Yeah, I was unicorn-hunting. This is why I didn't find my person until age 29. It was not for a lack of effort.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/22 07:04 PM
9

People are allowed to date whoever they want, and people are similarly allowed to look at the biases which underlie people's exclusionary "preferences" (which are usually dealbreakers disguised as such) and unpack them. If you choose to broadcast who you will and won't date, you are not immune from criticism or scrutiny for those choices. If you want neither, one could always keep those hot takes to themselves. Personally, the entire post reads as insecurity 101. Getting cheated on is getting ch…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/22 05:48 PM
1

If that's your experience with it, you need to find a better counsellor.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/22 04:28 PM
2

That is basically all men until they see their first bald spot.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/22 04:16 PM
1

My thoughts exactly.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/22 04:13 PM
1

The truth, I'm afraid.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/22 04:12 PM
3

I used to do 400 a day, but declined to 350 when I lost 23.5 lbs. I figure there has to be some reward for this accomplishment, lol. Hope you're not doing them without stopping!!
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/22 03:34 PM
1

Bold of you to assume coming up with random conspiracy theories is stereotypically masculine behaviour. Nice show of misandry there.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/22 03:28 PM
1

You implied that two men affectionately kissing each other is both "feminizing" (and why is femininity a bad thing, by the way? Let's unpack that too), and that any lack of stigma against it displayed by any individual or culture is part of some weird conspiracy. That you lack the courage to concede both facts is a pretty good demonstration of why I am not attracted to men who display toxic masculinity. For one thing, I like honesty in a man.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/22 03:19 PM
1

I mean, my boyfriend of 7.5 years has kissed a boy. I don't have a problem when it comes to dating my love life is great. I have a problem with men who display toxic masculinity and homophobia doing so, and then denying it.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/22 03:03 PM
1

You made a comment about men kissing each other being both "feminizing" and any questions about it made by an individual being part of some weird conspiracy. And you now backpedal and refuse to own what you said as having any sort of negative or homophobic connotation, which is just plain lol. I personally prefer men who have the emotional courage to be vulnerable and are not afraid that they will appear "feminine" if they behave in any way they want to. That is not a "conspiracy," that is a pre…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/22 02:40 PM
2

Okay, well I don't really see how passing laws that incentivize young women to flee a state and commit suicide in larger numbers is "solving problems" for men, unless we can consider that a more male-skewing gender ratio is considered helping them not be tossed aside. So if you are a Texas resident, you may not live in sausageland, but your son most likely will.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/22 02:17 PM
2

I am not familiar with the RW. But I'm talking about what will happen as a result of these laws. Women don't have to stay where their lives are in danger. The entire premise of your argument is that women have to stay and put up with these men. They actually do not. There will always be men who are not psychopaths that women will gravitate towards. And that includes physical proximity, moving to where they live.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/22 02:06 PM
1

https://www.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/comments/w4cr0w/daily_community_chat_megathread/ih5eaar?utm_medium=android_app&utm_source=share&context=3 Guess you sleep-post in the middle of the night.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/22 01:56 PM
1

Keep taking women's rights, and the exodus will continue 🤷🏽‍♀️ had a look at Saudi Arabia's sex ratio lately? Men pass sausage laws, men get sausage state.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/22 01:54 PM
6

Nah, that's a subset of men (conservatives) who deserve to be tossed aside. Given that young women are more likely to leave the state for university now than before and statistical data from El Salvador shows that teen girls became more likely to commit suicide when the same law was passed, they will find themselves increasingly in a sausagefest. Some men are not smart enough to figure out that every patriarchy on earth that oppresses women is a sausagefest. They earned their fate.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/22 01:44 PM
3

Okay but in fairness, that's appalling when it's said to women and it's also appalling when it's said to men. Expecting adults to remain celibate from puberty through menopause in women's case or their entire lives in men's case even when in the midst of a relationship is not exactly humane or compassionate. Anyone saying this does not have the moral high ground.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/22 01:41 PM
8

Except in Texas even a little girl who was molested by her father does not have a choice.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/22 01:39 PM
1

You stated that any man who shows affection for another man is feminized. Yes, you are homophobic. I prefer men who are indisputably not homophobic. That is not a conspiracy, it is a preference.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/22 01:38 PM
2

Yes, I agree.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/22 12:58 PM
1

Or maybe some women just have a preference for men who are comfortable with themselves and being vulnerable and not homophobic?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/22 11:08 AM
2

She is an idiot in my opinion. You're actually the one who is trying to police other people's opinions, which is their right. If I naturally look down on someone for being a gross degenerate or a hypocrite or an idiot who increases their chances of dying alone over some stupid shit, I will do so and there is nothing you can do about it. If you don't like free speech, get off the internet.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/22 11:06 AM
3

A short girl who only wants to date men who are 6 feet or over is an idiot, there's a difference. Hypocrisy is about behaviour, not looks.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/22 11:01 AM
2

Certain m*n being hypocrites would fall under "morally inferior." It shouldn't be surprising when it happens.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/22 10:55 AM
1

Women thinking you're gross, degenerate and morally inferior isn't seething, it's just an opinion. If anything, you are seething that women are looking down on you, as is their right.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/22 10:50 AM
1

Is America too homophobic for this to happen there? I get the feeling that it is. https://goodmenproject.com/good-feed-blog/study-of-the-day-straight-british-men-kiss-each-other/
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/22 03:37 AM
1

Um. Isn't that just porn?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/22 03:20 AM
1

It's punk rock. And yeah, that's pretty much it.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/22 03:18 AM
1

Men's greater likelihood of cheating doesn't begin until the woman is pregnant and grows steeper after midlife. If you're just looking at twentysomethings then yes it's equal. But life is long.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/22 01:26 AM
-1

I don't know. I kind of feel like people are entitled to their preferences. But I will say this. When I first heard these lyrics: "Man up, sit down Chin up, pipe down Socks up, don't cry Drink up, just lie "Grow some balls, " he said "Grow some balls" Man up, sit down Chin up, pipe down Socks up, don't cry Drink up, don't whine "Grow some balls, " he said "Grow some balls" The mask Of masculinity Is a mask A mask that's wearing me The mask, the mask, the mask I'm a real boy Boy, and I cry I like…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/22 01:12 AM
3

Well, good for you. I don't think it's the norm for couples to be swinging since day 1 though. My impression is that most do once they are years into a once-monogamous relationship, which is obviously a different dynamic.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/22 12:11 AM
2

Single men have a higher rate of mental health issues than those in relationships. Not necessarily: https://www.psychologytoday.com/ca/blog/living-single/201705/will-you-be-less-depressed-if-you-get-married-two-studies. "So were the singles who were dating less depressed than those who had no romantic partner? No! There were no differences, for the women or for the men. In fact, for the women, the four categories (married, cohabiting, dating, single and not dating) hardly differed at all. One of…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/22 11:49 PM
2

I have no idea why some people are getting mad at you. It's a generalization sure, but it's obviously based in truth.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/22 11:38 PM
2

I honestly feel so sorry for these women. I'd be a full-on lesbian or trying to be if I was one of them.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/22 11:31 PM
1

I had a crush on Joe Talbot of Idles who is bi, but then I realized he's a smoker and there it went.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/22 11:25 PM
2

The study clearly said single and divorced men. Are you being serious right now? From your article: "Research indicates that divorced men have a higher rate of mental health issues compared to never-married, separated, and widowed men, as well as divorced women." Never-married men are also single, and report better mental health outcomes. So then, don't get married. No one said anything about abusive relationships. Do you have amnesia? The final portion of my comment which you aggressively respo…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/22 11:20 PM
2

There is no need to nitpick groups then proceeds to cite an article which exclusively references primarily divorced American men, a subset of population if ever there was one, lol. America has an entirely unique social culture that cant really be compared to other first world nations. Is that not the responsibility of Americans themselves to diagnose and remedy? I mean, if Canadians, for example, can marry less than Americans do: https://worthwhile.typepad.com/worthwhile_canadian_initi/2013/11/m…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/22 10:42 PM
2

Oh, you must be one of the 60% of US residents who doesn't own a passport. How.... provincial. Also, even in the US, men are not a monolith. Life expectancy has declined for white Americans without a college degree, but not for other groups there: https://www.theatlantic.com/education/archive/2017/03/the-collapse-of-the-white-working-class/520815/, https://www.cbsnews.com/news/life-expectancy-black-wealth-federal-reserve/. Other high-income nations have lower marriage rates than the United State…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/22 10:01 PM
3

Actually, no it has not been statistically proven, as many countries have been reporting decreasing suicide rates: https://www.economist.com/international/2018/11/24/suicide-is-declining-almost-everywhere I would also point out that men are not a monolith, residing in one country or coming from a single ethnic group. The fact that you do do not seem to be aware of these basic facts makes me question your intelligence as well as capacity for objectivity, as you are clearly projecting your own mis…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/22 09:34 PM
–

Or you just end up with a good guy which I did, because you had actual standards for behaviour.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/22 07:18 PM
3

Your so-called case study is a pretty poor example, and a "fuck ton" of men "dropping out" is not necessarily a problem at all. We live in a culturally permissive time where people don't have to pursue relationships they don't want to be in, just for the sake of coupling up. Your entire statement rests on the premise that everyone has to marry and reproduce, and that's just culturally no longer the case. If the "price of admission" for some men is that they have to do an equal amount of childcar…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/22 05:48 PM
8

Where did I state that the women couldn't be at fault? Normally in the breakdown of a relationship, both parties are at fault and those who are emotionally mature can recognize their part in the relationship failure, even if it's just red flags signalling incompatibility that they chose to overlook in the beginning. A person stating that they are totally blameless victims in the breakdown of every one of their relationships is themselves exhibiting a red flag.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/22 05:33 PM
0

Your wholesomeness is thawing my cold, pink pilled heart. But only just a little.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/22 05:30 PM
1

Awwww
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/22 05:30 PM
14

What seems likelier: that your friend needs therapy so he can cultivate healthier relationships and make better mate selection choices, or that you know everything about his interior life and it's all 100 million women in a nation who are the problem, and he is perfect? Perhaps a little humility would not go amiss for yourself as well, sir. Have a lovely day.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/22 05:25 PM
–

They're really trying to convince us that such men "checking out" is a loss. All it means is fewer divorces.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/22 05:08 PM
–

Beautifully said.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/22 05:07 PM
0

Only children are statistically likelier to be childfree; they're unlikely to be deterred by the prospect of unlimited freedom.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/22 04:57 PM
–

You do realize you're only getting your friend's side of the story, right? His past partners may have some choice words for his behaviour as well, they may also see him as being entitled, for example. Ultimately, if someone genuinely believes they are perfect, never at fault, and require no improvement, arguing the point with them is futile and unlikely to change their view of the matter.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/22 04:56 PM
–

If he's incapable of taking any ownership for his mate selection choices and critically examining them (most people have a type), then maybe he should be single until he's willing to do the self-work. Everything you listed is external, but it sounds like his internal life is a mess. Also, one can't just assume that unmarried or childless automatically equals unhappy. 27% of Michigan adults state that they don't want kids, for example.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/22 04:39 PM
–

I mean, why tho?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/22 04:37 PM
1

Ahhh, ok.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/22 04:34 PM
–

I mean, that's your opinion though. From my standpoint as a woman, a lazy or excessively cheap man is not the most desirable and he's welcome to embrace that bachelor/sugarbaby life.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/22 04:34 PM
7

Honestly, I used to read the Savage Love column from Dan Savage, and he was a big proponent of "monogamish" relationships, and he would come up against this problem with his readers time and time again, in various scenarios it just kept happening, too many couldn't overcome the feeling that their relationship had been tainted and was worthless, and he would just try and lecture them out of it.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/22 04:32 PM
–

I mean, I gotta be honest: I fail to see the issue with a guy who is too lazy to put effort into being romantic and winning a woman over removing himself from the dating pool altogether. I actually think that means it's working.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/22 04:27 PM
1

What's ASD?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/22 04:24 PM
6

I think the vast majority of these couples who swing just for sexual novelty will end up splitting up anyway, largely for spiritual reasons. They want the purity of romance back. Deep down, in the very back of their minds, they feel their love has been "tainted" and soiled once they've crossed that line, and in the end they go searching for a new partner and relationship that is pure and untainted by the stain of infidelity (even if sanctioned). They go in search of a fresh start, because a rela…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/22 04:10 PM
3

Makes sense that red-pillers embrace tribal loyalty. They are quite primitive, after all.
/r/ExRedPill21/07/22 04:00 PM
1

Wouldn't that depend entirely on the person in question, and whether they think it is or not?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/22 03:52 PM
2

Not for me. The potential for STDs, emotional attachments to someone other than your partner/existential threats to the relationship, and just overall drama is really just not worth it to me. I think it's a really effective way to end up single again.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/22 03:51 PM
2

K. Have a nice day, keep embracing that misogyny, seems to be working really well for ya so far.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/22 03:32 PM
2

Lol at your life rn tho.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/22 03:29 PM
1

"different views" like women are inferior and don't deserve rights? I only wish for people to get what they deserve. If you're against karma or terrified of it, you're probably a bad person.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/22 03:27 PM
0

Sorry about your experiences/interpretation 🤷🏽‍♀️ I have a large group of friends and an amazing partner because of the way I treat people.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/22 03:21 PM
2

I think bad people deserve to have bad things happen to them, proportionate to what they did. I'm not a bad person or a bad partner, so I'm not worried about it.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/22 03:17 PM
2

Like I said, you can interpret any event in any way you like. PickMes never prosper. She will be divorced, and there is still plenty of time for him to die alone. 🤷🏽‍♀️
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/22 03:03 PM
0

I can't be responsible for your interpretation of something. That's ultimately up to you.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/22 03:00 PM
-1

He literally said he's proud of being a TRPer. I do feel sorry for her in the sense that she'll probably be a middle-aged single mom, but that's about it.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/22 02:57 PM
-1

Eldenring fan? Nah, your mom pays the mortgage and you live in the basement 🤪
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/22 02:55 PM
0

Lol, you're not my boyfriend. He works for a living and that's what he's doing right now. Being a man/being productive.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/22 02:53 PM
1

I'm not asking misogynists though. Like, they're welcome to give their opinions, but ultimately I never asked them for it, lol. I was literally just stating that it's a latent fear, that I think I know him and his mind, but there are things about his past mindset that I don't know about. I wouldn't want to be with a man who was ever red-pilled, to me it's like nonconsensual sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/22 02:52 PM
0

To suggest she's not stupid and knows who she's dating?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/22 02:50 PM
0

But that doesn't trouble me. Your girlfriend knows who you are, and is choosing to be with a woman-hater. That's fine, you have her consent and frankly she's asking for it, lol. It's the notion of the ones with the red pill/incel past that is hidden. But I don't actually think it's possible to hide something like that forever, truth leaks out.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/22 02:47 PM
1

Personally, I love my dad and see him every week. But I am also a child of divorce referring to my stepfather.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/22 02:45 PM
1

How proud of yourself you are, your girlfriend probably knows and is a self-hating PickMe who thinks she can't do better.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/22 02:40 PM
0

Most former junkies eventually relapse, I think it's the same thing with being a double-standards-holding misogynist. Like, the woman who forgives such a man can't be surprised when he cheats and thinks it's his right to do so because he was born with a penis, or even blames her.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/22 02:38 PM
1

He had a lot of resentment towards his father. Though it pretty much melted away when he passed.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/22 02:19 PM
1

I think I also question whether it's possible to grow out of that kind of mindset. Like, I think it's a sign of entitlement, they probably don't treat their partners very well because they think they don't have to, just because they are men.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/22 02:18 PM
1

It's probably just-world fallacy. Like, it comforts me to know that males who got off on putting women down, promoting sexism and double standards and saying that they don't deserve equal rights and respect will die alone, and/or get divorce-raped, because that's karma and what they deserve.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/22 02:17 PM
1

Do you also exalt your dad though? Because he basically worships his mom and felt a lot worse about his dad.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/22 02:14 PM
2

Living rent-free in a copiminium, I see. Married in 1968, 0 kids. https://people.com/food/ina-garten-feminism-husband-jeffrey-garten-cookbook/
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/22 02:14 PM
2

Whatever helps you sleep at night, darling.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/22 02:08 PM
1

I think people generally end up with partners around the same n just because they have similar backgrounds and temperaments, level of attractiveness, etc. Like my bf and I are both extroverts and his n is around 40 and mine is around 30. But we didn't ask each other that, it just came out years into the relationship that I found his out and realized it's close to mine. And I guess it made sense.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/22 02:07 PM
-1

I mean, that's not a denial, so yeah, it does.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/22 02:05 PM
-1

Yeah, but you're also probably dying alone because no woman can enduringly love someone who behaves and treats women the way you do, as men with your mindset should. Like, a man can't hide who he is truly is forever, right?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/22 02:03 PM
2

As a woman I am genuinely haunted by the fear that my man may have ever been an obnoxious TRP male/male with an incel mindset. He loves his mom a lot so I cling to that as a sign he was never a depraved keyboard misogynist who actually believed this crap. I mean, could he really keep up the ruse doing the exact opposite of what TRP says for years??
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/22 02:01 PM
3

Cigarette smoking and having what I consider to be sexist or conservative views.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/22 01:30 PM
2

plus let's be real Elvis was an outlier, I mean no homo but you see how handsome that dude was in his prime? 😂😂😂 I mean, that's legit he was handsome af XD I just find it curious because TRP guys are obsessed with young women at peak fertility (that's why they invented the concept of the wall), yet they are telling men to embody what women who are passed that are more likely to prefer than the younger women. It's almost like they are making a concerted effort to keep young men single and watchin…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/22 01:06 PM
4

I suspect for a nontrivial number of them, that's the kind of man they want sexually, and they're projecting.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/22 12:59 PM
5

This is mostly just you inventing things in your head.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/22 12:57 PM
8

"He knew Elvis was destined for stardom. And we like to take credit for the black and pink look he wore. Back then, young men did not wear pink. If they did, they were thought of as being too feminine. And of course, everybody wanted to beat Elvis up because he looked a little bit feminine for that time, and he was taking everyone’s girlfriends away! But Elvis was determined to stand out. He knew what he was doing." https://nypost.com/2022/07/20/elvis-presley-became-a-rock-n-roll-icon-with-the-h…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/22 12:54 PM
1

wtf, is she lying? I first had an orgasm by accident just exploring down there when I was like 12.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/22 02:54 PM
6

I think this is bang-on. Immigrant/second-gen/minority women want western, egalitarian, non-misogynistic men, and their male counterparts double down on their entitlement and being the opposite, which makes them repulsive to "their" women. Some portion of the women will pursue more western men, and some portion will exit the dating market altogether in retaliation, and you end up with a stalemate. Then these men head to reddit and the incel sites to whine.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/22 11:37 AM
19

My friend is a music tutor and touring rock musician. He can only afford to live in our city due to rent control but has no issue getting women.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/22 01:42 PM
4

Actually, yes you do wish to emulate them. You have stated that women should be denied the opportunity to participate in the paid workforce because they are born women. Can you please explain how what you advocate diverges from the policies of present-day Saudi Arabia?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/22 01:41 PM
15

The reality is almost all guys are like you at your age, but then many later get mad that all the single women have been "despoiled" by men like yourself and/or just aren't that interested in settling down after having dealt with men like you when they were younger. It's like a snowball leading to more people living the single life forever, law of unintended consequences.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/22 10:07 AM
7

I would be interested to know which society historically men did not eventually seek to destroy. None such society has ever existed. Upheaval, misery, destruction, and violence is the default state of the human species, as you yourself eluded to, but insist on its perpetuity for reasons of base and primal instinct. All you're really hoping to do is defer the inevitable upheaval by a generation so that you do not have to personally bear witness, and you're happy to sacrifice other people's teenag…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/22 04:04 AM
5

And that is your opinion based only on your values. There will always be people and societies that disagree. And those are the places where women will always flock. The diversity of human culture and temperament is a feature, not a bug. No matter how much you'd like to, you cannot will it away.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/22 03:51 AM
5

Oh, and also: women who perform abortions on themselves are more likely to die in the process than those who have medical assistance, which means fewer childbearing females in said population, also skewing the sex ratio more male. Patriarchy always results in more sausage.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/22 03:47 AM
8

Every society in existence wherein men "impose their will" is rewarded with disproportionately more of that which they value at the expense of half of the human race; more men. Look at the sex ratios in China, India, even in Saudi Arabia which definitely does not have legal abortion, "The sex ratio of the total population was 1.233 (1,233 males per 1,000 females) which is higher than global sex ratio." It turns out women can also impose their will. They can opt out of life (India has the highest…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/22 03:40 AM
12

I am currently in my mid-30s, and when I go clubbing it's with both genders, including my boyfriend of 7 years. I don't get "fucked up," chances are your wife is the one doing so to cope with motherhood, or sorry the "biological imperative" you claim we all have. If that's the case then why is the notion of women diverging so threatening that you would advocate for women's rights to be curtailed? Won't most ultimately submit if creating nuclear families is so innate as you claim? You made the ar…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/22 03:17 AM
9

I have a friend who is an attractive teacher and natural ectomorph and hasn't dated since the pandemic started and isn't all that interested. She just turned 33 earlier this month. I've asked her why and she said that me and my boyfriend (we have a great relationship) are the exception and not the rule, and that most relationships are unhealthy and dysfunctional. I couldn't argue with her. That's certainly been my experience before meeting my boyfriend. So I just said, "That's true," and dropped…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/22 03:05 AM
11

If suffering defines the human experience then there is really no need for more humans. It's just not necessary. The purpose should be having a decent quality of life, not just simply existing to exist, replicating to replicate. We're not amoeba. If women have to sacrifice quality of life so men and children can thrive, then men and children don't have to be born, and then no one has to suffer.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/22 02:57 AM
11

If the world has always been shitty and always will be, then the ones who suffer are the children who are born but didn't need to be. The solution in that case is to not birth them.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/22 02:51 AM
5

I mean, life really is hell for most women on the planet, so I feel that thread 💯 There are like 15 of us who live in western regions where abortion is legal and we opted out of kids that the stats say are really thriving, and all the others are depressed, buried under a pile of laundry and trying to overlook their husband's cheating so they don't end up in section 8 housing alone with their kids.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/22 05:02 PM
1

Literally what?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/22 04:51 PM
1

Untrue, women cheat 70% as much as men.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/22 03:39 PM
0

"The economy always booms and busts, if people coupled up (which was what the economy was built around) people wouldn't have much trouble" This is the dumb take that you made.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/22 03:37 PM
2

It's 2022. Only rich people get married anymore. It's bad enough the government took our GST refund away for living together. Who can even afford weddings or houses? You must not be a millennial.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/22 03:35 PM
1

My bf of 7 years. He just is extremely appealing to talk to. It's actually never happened since we've met that someone spoke to him for awhile and didn't like him. Literally everyone alive likes him and wants him around. I'm a far more polarizing person than he is.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/22 03:15 PM
0

None of that has to do with declining relationships and marriages anyway. I'm aware. You were the one who claimed that if people couple up they're automatically alright fiscally. That was a super dumb take.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/22 03:14 PM
1

Being socially inept and off-putting to women in general.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/22 03:12 PM
1

Men can have whatever preferences they want to. Just personally, if a guy I was on a date with asked me that question, there would be no follow-up date. What's the problem with either scenario?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/22 03:11 PM
1

Are you white?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/22 03:05 PM
1

Correct.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/22 03:04 PM
1

Not the Quest bars version!
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/22 03:02 PM
2

Hahaha imagine being so delusional and out-of-touch you think being in a couple automatically means you can afford a house.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/22 03:02 PM
1

Birthday cake flavour.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/22 03:00 PM
1

It's not an issue anywhere except to billionaires who depend on slave-like wages like Elon Musk. People themselves are consistently happier and better off in nations where the birthrates are lower.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/22 02:59 PM
1

Yes. Men who got divorced had it coming, always.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/22 02:37 PM
1

But so what? Men can have their disqualifiers, and so can women.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/22 10:23 AM
1

Uh huh. Well as you said, there's really no need to continue. We already agree on a few basic premises, which is that many/most redpilled men will ultimately give up on and not end up in long-term relationships. We're splitting hairs on what this means and why, and we're unlikely to reach any kind of agreement on that, so best to end it here. Have a lovely day.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/22 10:21 AM
2

I think it's pretty clear how and why he ended up divorced.
/r/ExRedPill17/07/22 10:19 AM
1

So your evidence that terrorists are going around calling themselves that and owning it is a 19th-century war where the term they were using was rebel, insisting that this had a negative connotation and that they thought of themselves as terrorists rather than patriots? Your argument is rather unconvincing, to say the least. Yes, you're correct. Hard to be convinced by such a half-hearted and extremely disingenuous argument.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/22 10:15 AM
0

Has anyone ever heard a terrorist refer to themselves as such? Would a radicalized man ever admit it, or even have the self-awareness to recognize that he was? Of course not. To both him and the terrorist, he just has/is just fighting for his beliefs, which he deems objective truths. And no, I can't deprogram redpill men. They have to work hard at it themselves with extensive therapy. A few have been successful, they're documented in r/exredpill. But it's far more common for redpill men to simpl…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/22 10:08 AM
8

I've never heard anything good about that sub.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/22 10:04 AM
3

A man can have any preference he wants and a woman can have any opinion of that man that she wants. If a woman deduces that such man is a probable misogynist and should be avoided for any romantic or sexual context, or decided to immediately sever any ties should it be revealed that this was his preference or priority, why do men care that any particular woman feels that way?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/22 09:59 AM
3

I mean, no not at all. They don't have to deradicalize and deprogram themselves. Like you said, they can just be alone the rest of their lives never having a successful long-term relationship as most do end up if they don't. That's certainly always an option. Sugar babies aren't gojng away anytime soon and redpilled men keep them employed.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/22 09:56 AM
1

I don't think so. I think they're more likely to be permanent bachelors and end up alone, paying for sugar babies.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/22 09:38 AM
6

Yes, they either have to join r/exredpill and try and deprogram themselves/deradicalize themselves from the cult, or they accept that they will die alone. The red pill-to-mgtow/incel pipeline is extremely well-documented. Personally, I think 90% of them are ruined for life, it's like joining the Taliban. You wouldn't trust one of those guys to reintegrate into society and the vast majority of the time RP men cannot successfully have a healthy relationship or pairbond with a woman. Damaged goods.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/22 09:29 AM
2

Okay, and women are in fact less likely to be actively seeking a partner. They are, in fact, less likely to date. So what is the problem? Or is your complaint only about women who come to a debate sub to explain the many reasons women are less likely to seek a partner than the reverse, one of which is that dating is less safe for them? If you don't want to hear women's reasoning, don't come to a debate sub with women in it. Pretty simple.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/22 09:17 AM
2

And that's why online dating is easier for women. Because of the imbalanced sex ratio that comes from women taking this exact advice and not doing it.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/22 09:16 AM
1

They're usually saying and thinking degrading things about women. It's not that women care so much as a tell that the man is undateable and should be avoided outside of strictly professional relationships. Women are just expressing that the man has identified himself as having no romantic value. It's not so much "caring" as expressing their opinions of said man.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/22 09:11 AM
9

The man was literally exposed with screenshots showing him trying to negotiate the price of the sex he was paying for. In what universe is that high value?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/22 08:49 AM
3

She doesn't necessarily. In some cases there is a woman who would rather be alone than with an incel or a man who insists she breeds.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/22 02:23 PM
2

I'm not sure how much changed due to that. I was in my second LTR when I got the surgery, which made me look more facially attractive. But I had to move to an urban area in order to find a LTR to begin with, since I'm black and the men in the 'burbs I lived in when I came of age were racist and just used me for sex. Don't think facial surgery would have done much to change that tbh. I became marginally more attractive after the surgery, but the biggest impact was moving to a liberal area from a …
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/22 02:21 PM
2

I'm not sure what the point of your question is, other than to prove my point that so-called incels have no sympathy for women whatsoever, so why should we care about their alleged plight (most are racist standards-cels). I mean, point proven, I guess?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/22 12:46 AM
3

If one is choosing to be single because he doesn't see the benefits in having a wife he has to provide for, then one is voluntarily single, not an incel. As I said before, they choose not to.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/22 12:40 AM
3

I think you'll be hard-pressed to find a black woman who is going to be sympathetic towards a so-called incel male. Most of these guys are openly racist. They only care about their perceived lack of success with Staceys (young thin white women). They have zero ability to sympathize with what some women go through in terms of their treatment from men, and actively blame the woman for being mistreated. Again, nothing to feel sorry for there. If they want success with a specific subset of women, I …
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/22 10:21 PM
4

US has life expectancy 4-5 years below western European countries. It actually has a lower life expectancy than Costa Rica as well.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/22 11:51 PM
2

Why is Finland lower then?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/22 11:50 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter