redditor1138 Archive

Upvotes	Title	Category	Author	Subreddit	Date (UTC)

Upvotes	Comment on	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
3	If the sexes were reversed, I doubt Walmart would be selling this shirt for little boys... I am a man and your entire post is the most naive drivel i have ever read. Have you ever met a man? I am a man and I've been one for several decades, some of that spent in jail for assault. I've also, in violence, had my face lacerated twice requiring stitches, and my ribs broken once, all by men. I've had a gun pulled on me once, and seen one person shot so that he had to be in a wheelchair and wear a bag to shit and piss in for the rest of his life. I've had my lip split, my head cut and sever…	/r/MensRights	31/07/10 07:52 AM
1	If the sexes were reversed, I doubt Walmart would be selling this shirt for little boys... wat	/r/MensRights	31/07/10 12:51 AM
0	If the sexes were reversed, I doubt Walmart would be selling this shirt for little boys... Reading your post, however, leads me to believe some Women may truly be blinder. wat	/r/MensRights	31/07/10 12:33 AM
0	If the sexes were reversed, I doubt Walmart would be selling this shirt for little boys... I'm afraid this response might not prevent you from getting riled up, but... Women can be just as violent as men... This may very well be true, but violent men might still be more dangerous. Violent deaths and injuries requiring hospitalization (domestic or otherwise) are overwhelmingly inflicted by men. Now, that might simply be because women are more infuriating (bad joke, sorry)... Some women are bigger/stronger than some men, and some women may even be more prone to uncontrollable violent ra…	/r/MensRights	30/07/10 11:18 PM
3	If the sexes were reversed, I doubt Walmart would be selling this shirt for little boys... Well, I think it's fair to exclude opponents from writing the definition of an ideology: the republicans get to write their own party platform, the Catholic Church gets to write its own catechism, insurrectionist movements write their own manifestos, and so on. The opposition can certainly point out flaws, hypocrisies, dishonesties, etc with the movement's actions or beliefs, but they don't get to decide which people or ideas the movement must include or espouse. IOW, the problem of defining fem…	/r/MensRights	30/07/10 07:06 PM
2	If the sexes were reversed, I doubt Walmart would be selling this shirt for little boys... Most of the problem, I think, comes from an initial oversight. I doubt that the originators of the feminist movement could have dreamed that they would have been so successful... Yeah. "Feminism" was (and still is) pretty easy to define where there is clear oppression of women. When you are fighting injustice, it doesn't matter what you think of gender studies or what role women should have or how women and men may have different needs or any of that: if you are opposed to the injustice, then yo…	/r/MensRights	30/07/10 05:50 PM
26	If the sexes were reversed, I doubt Walmart would be selling this shirt for little boys... Increasingly, "feminism" appears to mean whatever the self-identified feminist says it means. Does it include "strong, accomplished women" like (gulp) Sarah Palin? Can a feminist be pro-choice? And if "feminism" now includes ironically dressing like a tramp but kind of meaning it, too, and the new breed of stay-at-home feminists, then how can it exclude the gray-haired, anti-capitalist, sex-is-rape womyn who have been at it for 40 years? The test for "true" or "real" feminism is becoming increas…	/r/MensRights	30/07/10 04:13 PM
1	This man got convicted for rape after what the judge considered to be consensual sex. He talked his way into a ladies pants, she regrets it, and now it is officially rape. But... according to you, if he comes ups and says "I am George Clooney", he looks like him, talks like him, and says, "will you have sex with me". If you have sex with him and find out later that he was lying all along, that isn't a crime? A human being is not the same as a box of cereal. People (both men, women, and a variety of gender-benders) routinely disguise and conceal what lies within, to varying degrees, when it comes to how they present themselves publicly. In that case, (s)he still ha…	/r/MensRights	22/07/10 05:02 AM
3	This man got convicted for rape after what the judge considered to be consensual sex. He talked his way into a ladies pants, she regrets it, and now it is officially rape. However, is (lying as a seduction technique) a sexual crime? Perhaps. Applying a "reasonable person" standard makes it very difficult to categorize sexual "fraud", because reasonable adults will reasonably expect that the world is full of people who will lie and mislead about sex. This is different from purchasing a box of sawdust labelled as cereal, because there is no reasonable expectation that such things should happen, and because there is no normal historical or social basis for conducting…	/r/MensRights	21/07/10 11:40 PM
3	This man got convicted for rape after what the judge considered to be consensual sex. He talked his way into a ladies pants, she regrets it, and now it is officially rape. The question comes down to consent. Can you truly have consensual sex with a person who has lied to you about key characteristics about their identity? Especially if that lie was solely for the purpose of convincing you to have sex with them... Well then it comes down definitions of "key characteristics about identity"... How about lying about age, or one's past history, or pretending to like football? How about someone who pretends to be happier or more successful or better-adjusted than they r…	/r/MensRights	21/07/10 07:02 PM
9	This man got convicted for rape after what the judge considered to be consensual sex. He talked his way into a ladies pants, she regrets it, and now it is officially rape. Also, how can sex be consensual if the woman wears makeup or a push-up bra?	/r/MensRights	21/07/10 04:36 PM