| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 14 | Hypergamy Studies | redhornet919 | /r/MGTOW | 13/06/18 05:11 AM | |
| 4 | Hypergamy Studies | redhornet919 | /r/MensRights | 12/06/18 05:49 AM |
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| -8 | I’m starting to worry that the discourse is pulling me to the Right.If you think fd is elitist then you aren’t familiar with his content plain and simple. You don’t have to agree with him; I certainly disagree with him on plenty of things but all the nigga does is critique conventional power structures. Also “never had a take twitter would disagree with” is wild. Every other time the nigga tweets he starts a left wing twitter war. | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 09/06/24 11:42 PM |
| -11 | I’m starting to worry that the discourse is pulling me to the Right.Fd signifier is the first one to pop into my head. He puts an incredible amount of thought and nuance into his discussions on gender/men and boys and while I sometimes disagree with his framing of things (patriarchy theory for example), the actual content of his words is second to none in my opinion in terms of holding men accountable where it is deserved and simultaneously showing grace to the struggles that men face in the world. He walks that line very well. | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 09/06/24 11:04 PM |
| 4 | Gender inequality has more evolutionary roots than sociogenic roots, research shows.Exactly. Biological pressures =/= that idea that inequality isn’t sociological in nature. OPs claim extrapolates that logic WAY to far. Just a quick example because I can nitpick aspects of this post all day; Saying that gender role changes were “due to changes in environment and feminism played no role in it” is wild. I mean maybe we can quibble about who we consider a feminist/ who had the most impact but that’s a separate conversation. This day that is to minimize the actions of people. The g… | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 03/05/24 02:05 AM |
| 13 | Why doesn't intersectionality theory able to explain the disadvantage of men?I’m not denying any of that. You are absolutely correct. I only come from where I am because I think to discuss the current conception of intersectionality without the context of the rest of the conversation around intersectional relationships is reductionist. We stand to gain nothing by simply opposing its popular conception. The conversation can only change in so much as we go out of our way to discuss those relationships in as wholistic a manner as we can (which is precisely what you acknowle… | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 29/04/24 12:21 AM |
| 10 | Why doesn't intersectionality theory able to explain the disadvantage of men?Honestly idk how to put this an a better way but as much as we choose to make it happen. We can’t let the likes of Crenshaw be the only voice talking about intersectional relationships of identity and personhood. Absolutely, hooks by no means has perfect takes on masculinity I just use her as example to say the body of work isn’t a monolith, that there is better and worse, and also to show that one can analyze these problems through that lens even if her analysis is not complete. In terms of the… | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 28/04/24 11:53 PM |
| 1 | Why doesn't intersectionality theory able to explain the disadvantage of men?As I said elsewhere, we give Kimberlé Crenshaw to much credit for intersectionality. Her influence absolutely has created a toxic dynamic between the general conception of intersectionality and denying male suffering. That being said analysis of intersectional relationships has been around since at least Du Bois (explicitly using the word intersectional I might add). If you want to define “intersectionality theory” by the rigid definition of anything that stems from Kimberlé’s interpretation of … | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 28/04/24 11:29 PM |
| 15 | Why doesn't intersectionality theory able to explain the disadvantage of men?Sure. I don’t disagree with that but I think I we give Kimberle Crenshaw to much credit for Intersectionality theory generally speaking. Sure she brought the phrase into common parlance and there is no denying that Crenshaw’s rhetoric has been let’s just say problematic at times to be generous (and I’m being VERY generous with that) but you can find reference to intersectional relationships of identity at least as far back as Dubois. I would also suggest there are far better analyses using an in… | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 28/04/24 11:11 PM |
| 6 | Why doesn't intersectionality theory able to explain the disadvantage of men?This is the correct take. It’s not actually an issue of theory but an issue of how and where it’s applied. As I’ve said elsewhere I’m not a big fan of intersectionality theory but it can analyze the examples op uses if the person chooses to. The fact that many simply ignore how aspects of masculinity are detrimental is not an inherent part of intersectionality but a bias of people applying it. Part of that is absolutely because it is popular in feminist spaces but that’s not prescriptive. There … | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 28/04/24 10:44 PM |
| 27 | Why doesn't intersectionality theory able to explain the disadvantage of men?So I need to preface this with I’m not a big fan of intersectionality theory for plenty of reasons but I have to disagree. There are issues with intersectionality but I would give it the benefit of the doubt here. Intersectionality theory doesn’t just say man + black = more privledged than women + black. That’s the pop, dumbed down version of it. Intersectionality in the academic sense is simply the idea that aspects of one’s person/identity can compound oppression and privilege. In this case, i… | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 28/04/24 10:15 PM |
| 3 | Gen Z women place more moral value in Care & Fairness. Gen Z men in Liberty & In-Group Loyalty, study findsthese differences are maybe enought to be statistically relevent but they also highlight that men and women are far more the same than different. I would also argue that "in-group loyalty" is probably not a great category to judge morality. in group loyalty to what? religion? ideology? politics? Gender? Race? all of these categories are going to give you different answers; to average them all together feels maybe not disingenuous, but definitely not an accurate representation. I would bet you th… | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 29/03/24 12:07 PM |
| 2 | Lwma youtubersWhat do you mean by “the patriarchy shtick”? I’m unfamiliar with his content. | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 13/03/24 04:35 PM |
| 1 | Lwma youtubersAba definitely fits into that category as vague as it may be. Preach less so as he will sometimes push back on Aba when he gets really out of pocket but not nearly enough in my opinion. Aba also does most of the talking so their content definitely comes off as more redpill than not. | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 13/03/24 04:29 PM |
| 0 | Lwma youtubersYeah she definitely falls into the “I’m a liberal/centrist but I only ever talk about the problems with left leaning politics” camp which in reality just means conservative lite. Agreed that that doesn’t make her content all bad but she’s not left leaning by any measure. All you have to do is look at who she hangs around. It consists of a lot of MRAs who are also trad cons that idealize the nuclear family structure (cough cough Hannah Wallen). Not to say that the problems they diagnose are alway… | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 13/03/24 04:24 PM |
| 4 | On a serious note: Can we talk about how men of color aren't allowed to be vanilla or "squares"?I would argue the exception proves the rule here though. The reason that Urkel was so well received amongst black people in particular is that he was a different representation of black people that hadn’t been shown before. It’s the same reason miles morales has had such a positive reception amongst young black men. That young black nerd that many of us identify with while becoming more popular in media, has never really been a common thing in pop culture. It’s like Urkel, early Kanye, Donald gl… | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 05/02/24 09:06 PM |
| 5 | On a serious note: Can we talk about how men of color aren't allowed to be vanilla or "squares"?sure but that not the argument he made. In a broader conversation about how non-white men cant be nerdy/normal/"vanilla", he described non-white people policing other non-white people's "whiteness" which has a very different motivation to generic anti white sentiment directed at white people. Culture policing amongst non white people comes from a desire to preserve and maintain culturally significant things within any given minority. that motivation is wholly different to toxic attitudes directe… | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 05/02/24 08:11 PM |
| 5 | On a serious note: Can we talk about how men of color aren't allowed to be vanilla or "squares"?okay but that isnt "racism against white people" though. Its culture policing where other non-white people expect a certain level of non conformity to the white ideal. we dont look and white people and think of them as "whitewashed" or tell them to stop acting white. its only a standard applied to non-white people. its toxic as hell but lets not pretend as if this is discrimination against whiteness as a whole when its not a standard that is applied to white people. | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 05/02/24 06:28 PM |
| 1 | Modern Radical Woke Feminism (MRWF) is essentially just "nice guy syndrome" extrapolated to all of society.I don’t really have an opinion on the second half of your comment but the first half hits home a piece of information that I think needs to be emphasized. Being a “nice” guy (or person for that matter) is not a recipe for happiness or success. Being an empathetic and caring human being is important and being a caring person is a virtue but only when accompanied by boundaries. Unfettered empathy and caring is a recipe to be walked over by partners, bosses, etc. at the cost of your own well-being. | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 28/02/23 06:06 PM |
| 43 | The woman who sexually assaulted me held the view that all men are evil and that we are sex crazed maniacs.I’m sorry this happened to you. I definitely agree that this line of thinking is problematic. It’s the same line of thinking as “Black people are more likely to commit crimes“. I don’t know that you’re gonna find any studies on it, but historically speaking, dehumanization is the first step in and mistreating and abusing other human beings. If you ever want to talk to someone else who has been assaulted, my DM‘s are always open. | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 03/02/23 01:24 PM |
| 2 | Why don’t we delete Twitter for deleting Dr. Peterson’s tweet and suspending his accountGo find his lecture on mgtow. He makes it very clear that if you are a man who decides not to be in relationships with women because of current power structures, you are and I quote ”a pathetic weasel”. Or go find his interview with Steve Paiken where he believes that becoming legally responsible for a family (ie. child support etc.) is entirely voluntary for men but not for women (which is the opposite of reality). He has displayed time and time again that he does not understand or care to unde… | /r/MensRights | 08/09/22 09:36 PM |
| 2 | Why don’t we delete Twitter for deleting Dr. Peterson’s tweet and suspending his accountBro. He literally believes men are and should be disposable. That it’s their duty to society. His beliefs are anti men. | /r/MensRights | 08/09/22 05:15 PM |
| 6 | Why don’t we delete Twitter for deleting Dr. Peterson’s tweet and suspending his accountBro just because he saying things common sense to anyone two brain cells in a way that sounds intelligent doesn’t actually make any of his arguments intelligent. You can listen to him because he sounds smart if you want but the reality is most of his content doesn’t hold a whole lot of substance. He says the same shit that pua’s were saying back 5 years ago but just with a phd to claim authority. Aside from the fact that his beliefs are intrinsically anti mens rights, you only need look at what … | /r/MensRights | 07/09/22 03:37 PM |
| -7 | Number of 'lonely, single' men is on the rise, says psychologist OP: More male hate from the Daily Mail. Another nail in the coffin for women trying to date.You don’t know what the 80/20 rule is do you…. | /r/MensRights | 16/08/22 02:29 AM |
| 62 | Tries to use the pass for casual assaultI mean it doesn’t make my day but at the same time I don’t feel bad for her. | /r/PussyPassDenied | 06/08/22 01:04 AM |
| 3 | Historical negationism on TV series.I believe it is two to one across history But there are absolutely periods Throughout human history in which the ratio is significantly higher. I believe the 17 to 1 figure comes from a period during the Bronze Age. | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 18/06/22 09:23 PM |
| 1 | Woman who admitted "shockingly depraved" sexual abuse and rape of a vulnerable young child has been jailed for lifeOf course it is. Society as a whole doesn’t care about the well being of men and boys. What’s your point? | /r/MensRights | 14/05/22 03:31 PM |
| 1 | The MeToo movement has gone too far.Agreed. I’m not saying it’s a positive thing. It was simply a response to you conflating sexuality (not a choice) and relationship status (definitely a choice) and while one depends on the other for many people, that is not always the case. | /r/MensRights | 09/05/22 09:01 PM |
| 1 | The MeToo movement has gone too far.You can still be aromantic and in a relationship. The choice to be in a relationship is not the same as your desire to be in one. It would be the equivalent of a gay man in a straight relationship | /r/MensRights | 09/05/22 02:42 PM |
| 17 | #MenToo and #AbuseHasNoGender is trending, and this is a HUGE step in the direction of mens rightsThis is what everyone seems to be missing. This case has gotten traction because Johnny Depp is a celebrity, not because he’s in the right. This case was incredibly public from the start and the lies were so blatantly obvious that they couldn’t be ignored. This case will end in a month from now and we will hear about yet another case in which a man will have his abuse minimized | /r/MensRights | 05/05/22 04:54 PM |
| 8 | Does Society Allow Men To Show Emotions?You say that as if the two are mutually exclusive. Part of “me” or anyone who isn’t living on a desert island is how we interact with those around us. You said if u feel like you can’t show emotion u need a better frame of mind Which betrays a fundamental misunderstanding of what is being discussed here. Many people here are perfectly capable of showing their emotions but get negative reactions from those close to them when they do. That’s not a problem that the can fix by just “worrying about y… | /r/MensRights | 23/04/22 05:07 PM |
| 8 | Does Society Allow Men To Show Emotions?Your statement in it of itself is true but this post has nothing to do with the capacity to show emotion. It’s regarding societal acceptance of showing emotion which is not the same thing. | /r/MensRights | 23/04/22 04:26 PM |
| 3 | New to this sub, been observing for 5 months, here is my summaryEquality for all in an admirable goal but that has nothing to do with anything I said? And as a side note, it’s certainly not easier. If it was it would already be done. It will take a lot of work inside and out by all people across the globe. It’s very easy to get people to ‘other-ize’ one and other. To actually achieve equality there needs to be widespread societal change and a realization that short term self interest at the cost of long term equality isn’t worth it. That’s not “easy”. | /r/MensRights | 17/04/22 10:47 PM |
| 7 | New to this sub, been observing for 5 months, here is my summaryYou keep using this phrase “actual feminism”. That doesn’t exist. Feminism is just a label that people adopt. It would be like calling Bernie sanders left leaning and expecting that to be an adequate description. Is he left leaning like Karl Marx or left leaning like bill clinton? Both are left leaning but 95% of their beliefs are going to be different. There is no one doctrine that connects all feminists together because the label itself is so broad that it has no meaning. You can’t just say th… | /r/MensRights | 17/04/22 05:03 PM |
| 4 | females going to draft your thoughts?I will certainly agree with your statement of “plenty of womens organizations…” but can we please stop saying that “feminists agree that it should be equal” as if all feminists are some monolith that agree on this or any other topic. Some organizations are doing good work. Others are actively fighting against equality. Your statement is too broad to be accurate. | /r/MensRights | 15/04/22 08:20 PM |
| 9 | females going to draft your thoughts?Dude. Stop needlessly attacking others you know nothing about. It’s solves nothing and makes us all look bad. | /r/MensRights | 15/04/22 08:14 PM |
| 10 | Men need to be more responsible with their equipment.No you’re not. it’s as simple as wrapping it up and not having casual sex Stop moving to fucking goalposts. | /r/MensRights | 15/04/22 04:28 PM |
| 5 | "How do I force my reproductive slave to stay?"This is straight up false. How are you going to prove that she lied? It’s not as if birth control is 100% effective. She could just claim “accident and there is nothing you can do to prove otherwise. There is no such thing as hard evidence in this situation. I can find you examples of boys (>18) who can’t legally consent who are forced to pay child support. If statutory rape isnt enough to prevent this, what makes you think you’re going to be able to prove lack of consent otherwise?? | /r/MensRights | 14/04/22 09:37 PM |
| 1 | Meanwhile, a new low from Ukraine: they are crafting the law to punish non-resident men who won't returnHaha my bad yeah it was a misspelling. Edited for clarity. | /r/MensRights | 13/04/22 08:28 PM |
| 21 | Meanwhile, a new low from Ukraine: they are crafting the law to punish non-resident men who won't returnThis isn’t ifs and buts… this is going to have real life consequences. And to answer you’re previous question by the way, id say that half the population is doing that already. If this conscription was universal, id still be against it but i could at least understand from the morale perspective that you were talking about above. It isnt though. Half the population is already exempt from this. | /r/MensRights | 13/04/22 08:14 PM |
| 9 | Meanwhile, a new low from Ukraine: they are crafting the law to punish non-resident men who won't returnYeah but you can’t get rid of it. In order the get rid of my American citizenship for example i would have to forsake in for another one. Otherwise the us govt just says “nah your still ours”. It’s the very definition of illusion of choice | /r/MensRights | 13/04/22 08:07 PM |
| 12 | Meanwhile, a new low from Ukraine: they are crafting the law to punish non-resident men who won't returnBruh. It’s not like citizenship is a choice. Your country claims you at birth. Not the other way around. | /r/MensRights | 13/04/22 08:01 PM |
| 36 | Meanwhile, a new low from Ukraine: they are crafting the law to punish non-resident men who won't returnThey wouldn’t. But if they lose then it doesn’t matter either way. If they win on the other hand, they have instantly alienated a bunch of their own citizens for minimal/no gain. They’ve taken a “maybe win/ lose” situation to a “lose/lose” | /r/MensRights | 13/04/22 07:56 PM |
| 81 | Meanwhile, a new low from Ukraine: they are crafting the law to punish non-resident men who won't returnBut there in lies the problem. To any man who is studying or working abroad that doesn’t come back for conscription. You have now ensured that they will NEVER come back because as soon as they do they will be thrown in prison for 5+ years. Same thing for anyone who saw the signs and got out early. They are ensuring that a bunch of well educated Ukrainians will never contribute to your economy again. The number of Ukrainian men in foreign countries that are going to come back as a result of this … | /r/MensRights | 13/04/22 07:35 PM |
| 15 | Meanwhile, a new low from Ukraine: they are crafting the law to punish non-resident men who won't returnBruh most of us are just anti conscription. Is that so hard to comprehend? Just because someone is fighting an evil institution doesn’t make all of their actions good or moral. Forcing civilians to fight and die is wrong. Full stop. Demanding that they come back to fight and die is wrong. Full stop. Letting all of the women and children escape will forcibly detaining the men in country is wrong. Full stop. That doesn’t mean that what Russia is doing isnt evil. It doesn’t mean that Ukraine doesn’… | /r/MensRights | 13/04/22 07:25 PM |
| 14 | Meanwhile, a new low from Ukraine: they are crafting the law to punish non-resident men who won't returnBruh. Most of us here don’t give a shit. In all likelihood Russia is committing war crimes across the board and I would bet most of us would condemn it. That being said forced conscription of civilians that have never held a weapon is immoral no two ways about it. Just because someone is fighting an evil institution doesn’t make them good And pointing that out isn’t wrong. I’m a US citizen but if Mexico started a war to reclaim California I’m still going to condemn any draft or conscription that… | /r/MensRights | 13/04/22 07:18 PM |
| 6 | Isn't there any first world country (in Europe) that treats men better?This is technically true but in most instances of the mother wants it then it is going to happen. Your running under the presumption that most people are reasonable and will be open to changing their mind which is certainly not the case. | /r/MensRights | 21/11/21 09:18 AM |
| 3 | Women are not the enemyIn principle I agree with you but the reality is that feminist groups and organizations have gone out of there way to oppose male spaces for precisely these things. The US is actually fairly middle of the road in terms of being problematic with these issues. Many European countries are far worse (take Portugal for example which knowingly gave less effective vaccines to men which has now caused a vastly disproportionate death rate by gender). When the national organization for women(the largest f… | /r/MensRights | 21/11/21 09:11 AM |
| 6 | r/Feminism - I got banned immediately LOLIslamic groups have burned teenage boys alive for less. Remember #bringbackourgirls? Where boko haram kidnapped a bunch of girls from a western style school and forced them into Islamic marriages?? Yeah they burned all the boys alive from the same schools for no more then receiving a western education. This is an issue of religious extremists forcing their views upon others. It only becomes a women’s issue if you ignore half the population. | /r/FeminismStopsWhen | 23/08/21 04:21 PM |
| 5 | She complains about men lying in online dating, then proceeds to admit that she is lying herselfThis is some fucking next level projection | /r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen | 17/02/21 06:51 PM |
| 11 | Shaming Men Doesn't Build Healthy SexualityIn the latest news, water is indeed wet. | /r/MensRights | 30/01/21 05:11 PM |
| 15 | Do you guys think this is true?Slightly exaggerated? Yes. Two sides of the same coin? No. They are different things. Women have inherent value as women because they have the ability to pop out babies. Men have no such inherent value. Everything a man is valued for is extrinsic. Mostly his ability to provide resources. Women may be praised for being good parents but bad mothers are treated much better by society than bad fathers. | /r/MensRights | 28/05/20 11:03 AM |
| 1 | No means no?If you were a "mgtow member" then you had a fundamental misunderstanding of mgtow and were never really mgtow to start with. Mgtow member is an oxymoron. | /r/PussyPassDenied | 07/02/20 03:06 AM |
| 17 | 'Bloodstained Men' take to Florida streets to protest circumcisionsThat's actually only possibly true. The studies that have been done in that area are incredibly dubious in their methodology and the only thing that has been found is that is may reduce HIV transmission. Even if all that is true and more there is far more evidence to show that it can create mental and physical health issues that imo far outweigh any perceived benefit. Not to mention that foreskin in it of itself has benefits. | /r/MensRights | 06/02/20 11:57 PM |
| 2 | When you selectively end your unborn child's life because you 'hate men'r/feminismstartswhen | /r/FeminismStopsWhen | 02/09/19 10:07 PM |
| 1 | Hypergamy StudiesThanks! | /r/MGTOW | 15/06/18 03:30 PM |
| 24 | “The Future is Female”: The Bleak Outlook for Male Employment and EducationI would disagree on one point. Society has never only served the interests of men. I would challenge you to name one society that has done so. | /r/MensRights | 26/03/17 07:10 PM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter