TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

reid0 Archive

View 0 posts and 22 comments by reid0 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Or you could just show her some old photos of you without the beard. It's not unreasonable to want to know what someone really looks like.
/r/MensRights10/01/17 04:45 PM
1

That is patently false. Read the article.
/r/MensRights27/12/16 04:01 PM
1

The question is not what action do we currently take against fear. The question is: should we act to reduce fear, beyond reducing the actual physical threat. The answer, in my opinion, is yes we should act to reduce fear because doing so has a positive effect on the society as a whole. Here's a study from Harvard specifically about this topic.. Your argument that any fear that any 'irrational fear' should be considered a mental health problem, is specifically addressed in that article.
/r/MensRights27/12/16 03:11 PM
1

You can call fear a mental health issue if you want, but at a certain point you'd end up having to call your entire population crazy because everyone has irrational fears. Fear of terrorism is a good example. The statistics to not justify the level of fear related to the subject. Is everyone who is more afraid of terrorists than they should be suffering a mental health disorder, or have they been fed the wrong information? Isn't it better to educate those people so that they're not living in fea…
/r/MensRights24/12/16 02:47 AM
1

That's not true. My point has been the same from the start. I'll reiterate in case you've missed it the past 20 times I've said it: A society should work towards reducing the fear it's citizens have for one another because fear, founded in reality or not, is detrimental to a society. The society has a responsibility to deal with that fear, my suggestion for that is through education. There is no straw man argument in any of that. That is literally the subject of the thread. Your efforts to poke …
/r/MensRights23/12/16 12:20 AM
1

There's no prize here. There's me, making reasonable, valid points about the original post, and you, talking about unrelated things in a weird attempt to 'win' a conversation. The talking points of this thread are very simple: Should a society work to reduce how afraid citizens are of each other? I think so. Does it matter if the fear is based in reality? Not really, the response is the same either way. How should fear be addressed? Education. Was OP right? Not in my opinion. Should he have been…
/r/MensRights22/12/16 05:04 PM
1

I did.
/r/MensRights22/12/16 03:06 PM
1

Just because OP didn't use the exact words that the government shouldn't treat mental health issues doesn't change the fact that he's arguing that point. "Your feelings are your problem." But people behave based on how they feel, and how people behave affects the other members of their society. So it's not only their problem, it's everyone's. Which is exactly why it should be dealt with, through education, as you've already agreed. You can frame it with whatever terminology you want, call it a m…
/r/MensRights22/12/16 01:41 AM
1

Go back and look at the actual post. In response to the question "Should a society not strive for its citizens to feel safe amongst each other?", OPs response included: Your feelings are your own to worry about, not a matter of public policy. I pointed out that a perceived threat is as problematic as a genuine threat, and that a useful solution for dealing with misperceived levels of danger is education. To which you replied: No argument from me. Educating the ignorant who fear what doesn't exis…
/r/MensRights21/12/16 05:02 PM
1

Educating them would be taking action.
/r/MensRights20/12/16 11:37 PM
1

There is a very simple solution that governments can employ to reduce fear, and reduce the likelihood of implied threats. That solution is education. After ending a pandemic, the institutions and staff involved inform the world of how they brought it to an end and how to avoid a similar pandemic breaking out in the future. They do so specifically because that reduces fear in the population, and because societies functions better when its people aren't living in fear. Education is a far more usef…
/r/MensRights20/12/16 03:32 PM
1

Really? Homophobia, xenophobia, Islamaphobia, religion, socialism, 'the democrats are evil', 'the republicans are evil', etc, etc. People live in constant fear of threats that aren't real. Are the people who are scared of these things crazy? Or have they been taught to fear a perceived threat? Removing the threat does not solve the fear of the threat, and fear of the threat is often as big a problem as the threat itself.
/r/MensRights20/12/16 12:00 AM
1

Eliminating the actual threats is a very good starting point but it serves little purpose if the threat is still perceived as real. Ever worked under a bad boss who constantly lets you know he can fire you whenever he wants? If you told him you he's making you feel like your job's at risk and it's stressing you out because you've got a family to feed, he'd tell you he's never threatened to fire you and that it's all in your head. Maybe he never would fire you, maybe he doesn't even have the auth…
/r/MensRights19/12/16 05:50 PM
1

Sure but who would want to live in a society where they don't feel safe? It's an obligation of a society to look after the people that make up that society and like it or not, how people feel day to day in that society is important. If you compared one society in which the vast majority of the people feel safe in their daily lives to another society in which the people are technically safe but feel afraid all the time, it's pretty obvious the former is a more desirable outcome. There are limits …
/r/MensRights19/12/16 01:02 AM
1

While that's true it doesn't mean that there aren't any women that are capable of doing 8 pull ups. Like you say, my girlfriend is useless at pull-ups. She can't even hold herself up to the bar even if she starts at the bar, but my sister can do 10 without breaking a sweat. Each recruit is tested against the same requirements on their own ability, as they should be, and if there are women who can pass those requirements why shouldn't they then be given the right to serve?
/r/PussyPassDenied10/12/16 06:38 PM
5

They have not been targeting college level female athletes, which is exactly what she said they're starting to focus on, which makes perfect sense if you want to get female candidates with a better chance of passing the fitness requirements.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/12/16 06:21 PM
12

Yes, 2 of the 3 passed the physical challenge and were accepted for combat roles. The title of this submission and the information portrayed in the video don't seem to marry up, and the video itself doesn't suit this sub in my opinion.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/12/16 06:17 PM
2

Australia.
/r/PussyPass24/02/15 09:09 AM
2

Fair play, it's late here. Clearly I misread that.
/r/PussyPass18/02/15 02:48 PM
0

You seriously wouldn't think fucking on the sidewalk would be an arrestable offence?
/r/PussyPass18/02/15 02:43 PM
1

The article, titled 'never hit a man', explains why it's a bad idea to hit a man and then explains that you just shouldn't hit anyone, ever and you're saying that's a bad thing?
/r/MensRights03/08/14 01:03 PM
0

http://hownottobeacrazybitch.com/2014/08/02/never-hit-a-man/
/r/MensRights03/08/14 03:57 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter