TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

rektHav0k Archive

View 3 posts and 158 comments by rektHav0k on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Good for you. Have sex, just be responsible about it by using contraception NO. That being said, anti-abortion laws like the one she railed against only work to harm women and do nothing to prevent, care for, or support women who have unwanted or unsustainable pregnancies. Women's rights is a REAL issue this November. Vote accordingly.
/r/TheRedPill12/10/24 01:49 PM
2

It’s mostly that people hear the word “earn” and think “are paid” which is what I’ve thought as well. But a person can earn anything really. Earnings and payment are not the same. You only get paid for what you earn, so women earning less doesn’t mean they’re paid less. They might simply be putting in less time or choosing other types of careers, which you’ve pointed out already. It’s just that by saying it this way, it puts the person using this jargon on the defensive, as they now have to expl…
/r/MensRights27/04/20 04:17 PM
23

That’s it exactly. The word is “earn” not “paid” for a reason. My response to this statement going forward is, “Yeah, but they get paid the same.”
/r/MensRights27/04/20 03:26 PM
5

Ah. I too like specifics. They “earn” 77 cents for every dollar but are paid equally and fairly. You’re right.
/r/MensRights27/04/20 03:22 PM
0

Not at the expense of not providing for your child, no. The child's needs come before yours.
/r/MensRights06/04/20 08:31 PM
-1

Your points are valid, but only because they are built off of my summary of the process and not the process itself. Imputation of income is not hypothetical, in that you are imputed at the average earnings of a person with your qualifications in your field of study. If you can demonstrate, after some time, that you are unable to secure that position despite your best efforts to do so, and that you are currently earning less in your current job, you may be imputed at the average of that job or yo…
/r/MensRights06/04/20 04:30 PM
17

That’s a funny thing for your lawyer to say to you, as it would be illegal for you to be poor-you’d be locked up for failure to pay support. But I get what he means. It’s not illegal for her to be poor. It can be tough justifying the support payments in your own head. In most cases, we are hardest on ourselves. But the money is going to your child, one way or another, and the payments will end eventually. You are obviously strong enough to bear this out, or smart enough to convince a court to mo…
/r/MensRights06/04/20 03:57 PM
20

As a single parent who has 50/50 and pays child support, I wanted to chime in. You are absolutely right and, in most 50/50 states, it is something that is expressly looked out for by courts. Usually there are numerous factors that weigh in on a CS determination, and family need is definitely one of them. In my state, both parents are imputed an income, based on either A) tax returns, or B) ability to earn. Once that's done, CS is calculated based on overnights, the difference in incomes, and the…
/r/MensRights06/04/20 02:08 PM
5

No and no. This is terrible advice. Don’t do this.
/r/MensRights06/04/20 03:11 AM
2

As they should be.
/r/MensRights22/01/20 02:52 PM
14

“All women lie.” Would garner the same amount of backlash, be most likely true (everybody lies), and would not be as aggressive.
/r/MensRights22/01/20 02:50 PM
2

Definitions exist, and you not liking them doesn't matter. You do you sweetheart. But here in regular America, rape is rape is rape. You can be raped by a man, woman, government, law, job, etc. It doesn't matter at all whether you agree or not, so why would I care how you view a word, especially when you're wrong. Oh, you care. If you didn't, you wouldn't have commented sugarplum. Stay stupid, I couldn't care less. It's a sign of weakness when you can't accept any criticism without freaking out …
/r/MensRights12/12/19 01:18 AM
1

It sucks, but it's definitely not rape, and you're delusional or don't know what the word means if you use it so flippantly. Given that my state doesn’t believe that men can be raped, and given that I don’t agree with that definition in the slightest, I’d have to say I could give a flying fuck about how you or anyone else defines rape. I define it as such and so do many men AND women. Also, if you care, its “scot free,” which looks worse but is correct. Yeah. You can thank autocorrect for that. …
/r/MensRights11/12/19 10:29 PM
6

These men were raped twice: once when their lives were ripped apart by these false charges, and then once again when their rapist got away Scott free. For those at home keeping score: raping a woman once is a crime. Raping a man twice is not.
/r/MensRights11/12/19 10:03 PM
1

It can be right-wing and ideologically biased and still be correct. How about thinking for yourself instead of letting a website fact check for you.
/r/MensRights27/09/19 10:44 AM
2

If your attraction is high enough, her boundaries, limits, rules, morals, ... everything will fade in front of chad's dick. Or maybe he just knew how to f-close. Things escalate and at one point she stops me saying this is a bad idea, that it would complicate both our career and that we should stop. It does put my head back on my shoulders so I don't insist and call it a night. It's not quite LMR, but it's close enough. You just failed a shit test and bragged about it. You basically cockblocked …
/r/TheRedPill17/09/19 09:58 PM
2

The sexual contract changes with marriage. She's got the commitment and the law to back her up, why would she need to have sex with you? She could, and probably would, if it was what she wanted, but at any time she can simply pull back and pull away and you're fucked. And there's no recourse, because sex isn't a legally enforced right (and it shouldn't be, don't get me wrong). It just means that all the cards are in her hands and you have two options: tow whatever line she sets, or cheat/file fo…
/r/MensRights04/09/19 08:17 PM
10

Which is why men should never marry.
/r/MensRights04/09/19 11:26 AM
26

“My body, my choice! My money, my choice!” Was the best line from that whole part.
/r/MensRights04/09/19 11:26 AM
2

This is called reactive abuse. Look it up. And dump anyone who treats you like this immediately.
/r/MensRights30/07/19 07:11 PM
1

This bill is dead. Legiscan has it listed so. It never made it out of the Judiciary Committee. This bill was posted in 2014. https://legiscan.com/NJ/research/A3908/2014
/r/MensRights26/05/19 09:18 PM
3

Depends. If she penetrates him, it's rape.
/r/MensRights26/05/19 02:34 PM
2

Not if she didn't penetrate you.
/r/MensRights26/05/19 02:33 PM
2

From the bill: Be It Enacted by the Senate and General Assembly of the State of New Jersey: 1. N.J.S.2C:14-2 is amended to read as follows: 2C:14-2. Sexual assault. a. An actor is guilty of aggravated sexual assault if he commits an act of sexual penetration with another person under any one of the following circumstances: (emphasis added) If this passes, then all men in New Jersey will be safer in not having sex than they will engaging in the act. The liability lies completely with the male, an…
/r/MensRights26/05/19 02:31 PM
13

Seriously. The whole point is that she is made aware with enough time to terminate the pregnancy. If she can’t afford it alone, then she should make that decision. If she doesn’t, it should be her responsibility to provide.
/r/MensRights23/05/19 08:10 PM
7

Gonna fuck my girl tonight just in spite of this.
/r/TheRedPill12/05/19 12:46 AM
22

Of course they did. Look at how it greatly reduces mate selection. The only women complaining about the "patriarchy" are the ones that are too ugly/broken to compete with other women within the bounds of its rules.
/r/TheRedPill11/03/19 11:12 AM
2

Wow. Yeah, I've heard of cases like yours. It happens here in America too, but the trend has been a little less severe lately. Just curious, but how do you even survive? If you're making $4000 gross, and they're taking $3500/mo in combined support, that only leaves you with $500/mo in pay. If it's as bad as you say, then that $500 goes to taxes. I'm not really sure how that works, as you'd be in debt from day 1.
/r/MensRights03/02/19 05:40 PM
5

Pre-nups are regularly discarded if children are born to the couple. It makes sense, since the children did not have representation at the signing.
/r/MensRights03/02/19 03:34 PM
0

You must also have a really good job. Most states won’t take more than 50% of a person’s income, so I can only assume you either A)make a fuckton of money, or B) live in a really shitty state. Since you’re here to tell about it, my bets are on A.
/r/MensRights03/02/19 03:31 PM
18

Write it anyway, ignore the guidelines, hold her accountable.
/r/MensRights18/01/19 02:13 PM
4

Nothing but a miserable little pile of secrets!
/r/MensRights17/01/19 03:38 PM
1

Generally, these rates are decided by the actuaries and government regulators and are based on hard data, in order to avoid actual discrimination. But data be damned, it doesn't fit our narrative. Yay equality!
/r/MensRights14/01/19 01:29 AM
8

You Monster!
/r/MensRights24/12/18 06:38 PM
1

Okay, so let’s review: Women have the right to terminate a pregnancy because it violates their bodily autonomy to force her to carry an unwanted pregnancy to term. Yes. Simply because it is unwanted. Men do not have this option because of the sole fact that they cannot get pregnant. There’s nothing we can do to change that. Incorrect. Men would have this option via paper abortion. Men do not have it now because the law has created an imbalance in power. Once the child is born, BOTH PARTIES have …
/r/MensRights18/12/18 02:37 AM
1

Fucking crickets. They never really can answer that question, can they?
/r/MensRights18/12/18 02:10 AM
4

Okay, well, by using that logic, wouldn’t it also be a violation of women’s bodily autonomy to force the entire burden onto her? Legally speaking, when a child is born, both parents have a responsibility to care for the child, and by giving men the option to ignore their responsibilities, therefore increasing the amount of effort needing to be put forth by the mother, they would absolutely be impacting her bodily autonomy as well. That is, IF we’re looking at the idea of bodily autonomy in the w…
/r/MensRights18/12/18 01:24 AM
3

So, would you consider having to pay a parking ticket something that takes away your bodily autonomy? To an extent, yes. So does most of the world, that’s why we hate parking tickets. Paying a bill, whether it be child support, a parking ticket or your car insurance, is not even part of the bodily autonomy discussion. Child support is not a bill. It’s a legal mandate that one person is entitled to the work of another because they, in the case outlined here, refused to abort a fetus unilaterally.…
/r/MensRights17/12/18 10:10 PM
6

Use the pill.
/r/MensRights17/12/18 10:03 PM
4

There are no legal situations in which women can do this to men without both parties consent. Forcing you to pay child support is not taking away your bodily autonomy. A bit of doublespeak right here. And just how should the man pay for the child support while retaining bodily autonomy? Is there a magic dwarf that will go to work for him at that shit job so the payments can be made? Maybe there’s a magic tree we can grow that will make the payments? It’s called child support but it should more a…
/r/MensRights17/12/18 09:24 PM
7

She still has time to take action under this plan. If she doesn’t, she’s made the decision to raise the child herself, complete with all the rights and responsibilities that accompany her choice.
/r/MensRights17/12/18 09:17 PM
2

https://youtu.be/D75ZuaSR8nQ?t=72
/r/MensRights11/12/18 03:57 PM
3

This is always a funny thing to hear. If a group is incapable of committing a crime simply because of their status, then they’re the group that holds power over that status. If you therefore define sexism as discrimination + power, only those who are the victims of sexism can be called the sexists. #fuzzylogic
/r/MensRights02/12/18 02:38 PM
-1

I read the linked ruling. The headline is precise and correct.
/r/MensRights21/11/18 12:16 PM
16

Eh? They're offering a way out of quotas. Either you take it, or you take quotas. They're probably not going to go bankrupt either way unless their product sucks.
/r/MensRights05/10/18 12:34 PM
6

Haha okay, racist. Because let’s pretend that the man who nominated him didn’t proclaim five men guilty of murder before any investigation or trial with a full page newspaper ad. You both can be racist. You don't get a pass just because he is. Due process, which so many men who support the current president believe in selectively at best, is for criminal trials. Kavanaugh is facing a job interview, one which he ranted like an unhinged lunatic during. Due process is also a measure by which the go…
/r/MensRights30/09/18 02:32 AM
5

he's never played any reasonably competitive basketball If this is a true statement, then fair enough.
/r/MensRights30/09/18 12:37 AM
15

This sub pretends really hard to not be hard right-wing and it’s hilariously telling seeing the truth coming to light in all these posts about this. Alright, user seems to think this is a partisan issue. Let's see what they post: This privileged white guy Ah, nevermind. The user is a racist. Whether or not you think the accusations are credible, the hyperbole here is ludicrous. You're missing the point of due process. Without it, anyone can claim you raped them and then ruin your life. Yes anyon…
/r/MensRights30/09/18 12:36 AM
4

Different article. OP should have linked to that one instead.
/r/MensRights20/09/18 08:25 PM
1

Misleading title. Triple talaq law was a divorce law that’s been barred by this ordinance, not allowed. And the law was only beneficial to men before; women couldn’t use it. Not sure what you’re trying to do here. But this is not the place to spread misleading info. Many of the men here came here for real news and solid advice. They don’t have the time for games.
/r/MensRights20/09/18 11:02 AM
5

Narcissism.
/r/MensRights16/09/18 12:13 PM
2

Hahahhahahahahahhahahahaha
/r/TheRedPill02/09/18 01:35 PM
2

It seems more like a piece made to sway the minds of politicians, and provide their voters with information to help back a particular stance. So, propaganda.
/r/MensRights01/09/18 03:24 PM
25

I want to start by saying that I agree with with you assessment that the report is laced with gender bias in favor of girls. That being said, "significance" is a statistical term used in a specific context only. 3.9% could be significant under proper analysis. As u/RichardJLyon points out, this may not be the case as the survey excluded many children on the basis of gender and contact with a male parent. Part of the right of claiming significance is the responsibility of the claiming party to pr…
/r/MensRights01/09/18 12:46 PM
8

Good work. I would include sources and: Address the fact that more and more fathers are stepping up and fighting for half custody (50/50 time scenarios) yet are still bearing the brunt of the cost (women are not required to be providers, yet men are required o be both nurtured and provider). The fact that the men cannot control the way the money is spent is a violation of their free speech. For example, if you support Trump and pay child support, does her campaign contribution to Hillary violate…
/r/MensRights27/08/18 07:02 PM
1

Okay. I hope not. I have had others commenting on my posts and comments recently, so it struck me as odd. But thanks for the check and heads up. I really appreciate that you’re out there looking out for us.
/r/MensRights19/08/18 03:19 AM
1

Thanks for the heads up. I will check into it.
/r/MensRights19/08/18 03:15 AM
215

Appeal. Quite often, judges have free reign because states use “guidelines” instead of actual, hard-codes law. Appellate courts may weigh in our favor if the finding was ungrounded or biased. That being said, how did you get the ruling after your ex? Did the judge postpone the judgement and mail it? Or was there a trial without you?
/r/MensRights14/08/18 06:05 PM
4

He’s recently apologized for that. His first introduction to MGTOW was to the incel portion of it. He more recently came about when he learned that some men are choosing that route willingly, due to their disgust with our gynocentric society.
/r/TheRedPill31/07/18 10:29 AM
9

Maybe? Lol. Nah bro. His sister is definitely a sociopath.
/r/TheRedPill22/07/18 11:17 AM
0

You’re assuming the formulas are followed regularly, which they aren’t. edit: From your reference to Disso Master, I'm assuming you're in cali. I'm in Jersey where the rules are ignored quite often.
/r/MensRights03/06/18 11:58 PM
1

That's true, but the point is that NJ is in no rush to put up posters chiding deadbeat moms who don't work and live off child support.
/r/MensRights03/06/18 03:38 AM
11

You're right, but the fact that they don't have similar posters across NJ about mothers working and providing is what sets off my nerves.
/r/MensRights03/06/18 03:36 AM
4

That's exactly what makes it so reprehensible to me. It's a fucking advertisement that plays on your sense of responsibility. But God Forbid they post a similar one about mothers providing.
/r/MensRights03/06/18 03:35 AM
2

I really can't agree with you, but I can understand where you are coming from. IMO, we don't always get to choose whether or not a responsibility is thrust upon us, but we always have to choose to do the best when it is.
/r/MensRights03/06/18 03:33 AM
2

Yeah. I'm really sorry for what you went through. As a father of two wonderful children, I could never imagine pitting them against their mother. I don't harbor the same feelings your father did; I am happily divorced and wouldn't take her back ever, even for the kids. I also can't imagine leaving my son alone for days on end without having someone stay with him or simply sending him to his mothers for the time. It breaks my heart to know that happened to you and I hope you are alright now and i…
/r/MensRights03/06/18 03:31 AM
1

Exactly. While on the other hand, the women get to play half the role and don't have to see shitty posters plastered all over reminding them to be good mothers.
/r/MensRights03/06/18 03:27 AM
1

Yup. We need more stories about them in the news.
/r/MensRights03/06/18 03:26 AM
1

I concur completely. It is a woman's world when it comes to the courts except in some rare circumstances.
/r/MensRights03/06/18 03:25 AM
1

Nah, you misread what I wrote and instead answered a question not posed here. Your comment: If that parent finds a job, support will be reduced, and as his or her pay goes up, support goes down. If that parent doesn't show a good faith effort to find a job he/she will be held in contempt of court and lose custody for a little bit - during which time no support will be owed - because he or she will be in County for a brief stay. has been shown to only apply in the case of the man except in very l…
/r/MensRights03/06/18 03:23 AM
5

Sorry to hear that. Both parents should have been working and spending equal time with you. Not knowing the details of why your mother lost custody, I just want to say that I hope things turned out okay for you. I wouldn't dare argue that the poster is wrong; I'd argue that there should be just as many printed for the mothers who live off of child support alone.
/r/MensRights03/06/18 12:21 AM
4

The point of this poster is important, and fathers should be more involved in their kids life than just money. I agree. And so does everyone here. The point is that a poster suggesting women should be more than just nurturers was never even considered.
/r/MensRights02/06/18 11:07 PM
9

really stupid I know criminal. The word you were looking for was criminal, not stupid.
/r/MensRights02/06/18 09:04 PM
8

How about this: Colleges shouldn't be in charge of investigating rape. Full stop.
/r/MensRights02/06/18 09:02 PM
24

I think what they're trying to do is make the case that you shouldn't just pay (or you'll go to jail), but that you should also be a part of the child's life because, you know, deadbeat dads and all. Funny thing is, they never put any shame on the mothers for not working hard enough to provide the children with a better life than just one parent can provide. It's almost as if one parent is expected to do both roles, while the other only has to fulfill one... hmmmmm.
/r/MensRights02/06/18 09:00 PM
11

I concur. It should be the responsibility of both parents to nurture as well as provide. If she refuses to fill her bucket, filling hers with half of mine is criminal.
/r/MensRights02/06/18 06:10 PM
2

Shit, I didn’t need prison. As a kid all they did to keep me from pulling this type of shit was read The Boy Who Cried Wolf. Worked like a charm.
/r/MensRights01/04/18 11:10 PM
5

Whole story is made up. Fake news. FAKE NEWS.
/r/MensRights01/04/18 11:09 PM
8

All the moral posturing in this thread over cheating. Read the fucking sidebar people.
/r/TheRedPill23/03/18 03:14 PM
17

Remove the female ones and replace them with the dual ones.
/r/MensRights17/03/18 11:54 PM
2

Don’t let the owner get away with it just because the employees do. Someone has to stop it.
/r/MensRights17/03/18 11:53 PM
1

He’s not talking about VLDL cholesterol that’s produced from sugar. He’s talking about HDL and LDL cholesterols that are produced when you you eat protein and fat.
/r/TheRedPill08/03/18 03:03 AM
13

If there’s anything to be learned from the feminists, it’s that brigading is a.o.k. when the poster is a sexist pig. In this case, the shoe fits
/r/MensRights22/01/18 11:52 PM
3

When you don't fancy someone you should talk about their characteristics. I agree. The trans-woman characteristic that I find unattractive is their dick.
/r/TheRedPill13/01/18 03:45 PM
3

Yeah, but society wont. Welcome to reality.
/r/MensRights18/12/17 11:40 PM
6

So what? So innocent people should have their lives ruined because some victims never come forward? That’s insane.
/r/MensRights18/12/17 11:15 PM
6

Who should? That’s easy. The person who doesn’t come forward a priori. If you’re raped, you have a responsibility to report it. If you fail in that responsibility, you have to own the consequence. Sons should not pay for the sins of their fathers, nor should daughters pay for the sins of their mothers. That’s eye for an eye bullshit and never ends. If we’re going to stop this cycle of abuse, we need to ensure the laws are written to protect victims on both sides.
/r/MensRights18/12/17 11:11 PM
9

That’s not the fault of the falsely accused. They shouldn’t have to pay for it.
/r/MensRights18/12/17 10:48 PM
3

Nah. If the person is a flight risk, you simply refuse bail. If the person isn’t, bail is an option.
/r/MensRights18/12/17 08:31 PM
10

They should have done so already.
/r/MensRights18/12/17 08:29 PM
3

You obviously trust the judge more than I do.
/r/MensRights18/12/17 08:27 PM
11

Until a conviction is rendered, it’s slander. Yes. She SHOULD get in trouble as dictated by our current law.
/r/MensRights18/12/17 08:26 PM
0

Here you go brother. Time to sort yourself out. https://youtu.be/rnaASd6Vm58
/r/TheRedPill23/11/17 03:16 PM
1

The easiest day was yesterday. Advice from this subreddit that always stuck with me.
/r/TheRedPill24/10/17 10:42 AM
0

Tha anger phase is a halfway house. A great place to use to get back on your feet, but a terrible place to live.
/r/TheRedPill24/10/17 10:31 AM
5

Enjoy their charity, maintain frame, and find another job. They're just sweetening the pot so you will feel guilty if you leave them. I'm curious to know their ages, though. I'm betting somewhere between 28-36?
/r/TheRedPill20/10/17 05:08 PM
4

What's this bullshit? She gets to pull his strings talking about fucking Brad Pitt, but when he throws it back at her he's the bad guy? Nah. And no, most MEN don't put up with this kind of shit. Most MEN shut shit tests down immediately.
/r/PussyPassDenied19/10/17 02:33 AM
2

Typical hamstering after a failed shit test.
/r/PussyPassDenied19/10/17 02:23 AM
0

If he does, then she's got some shitty friends. And if she's worried, then she's insecure AF. Two ways out of that, either move on, or woman up and stop shit testing.
/r/PussyPassDenied19/10/17 02:22 AM
8

Calling her out on her shit is not bullying. Get off your high horse. She said something stupid to her boyfriend. Probably to get a reaction out of him. Now she's upset because his response was better than her shit test. Boo fucking hoo. Play stupid games, win stupid prizes.
/r/PussyPassDenied19/10/17 02:20 AM
1

Just self identify as "trans". Gets you into whichever you want. Just make sure to answer the question "trans what?" with a scoff and an offended look.
/r/MensRights16/09/17 04:20 AM
2

Take it up with the store owner. Write a letter and hand it to them in person. Let them know that you are angry that their cashiers would let this person cut the line and that they should have refused to serve her until she waited for the last person in that line to pay. If you have the money, publish it in the local newspaper. Don't be aggressive in your tone. Be disappointed and express your desire to shop elsewhere from now on. I used to work a store with two registers and one line. When cust…
/r/MensRights03/09/17 08:29 AM
26

"Female supremacist". Love this name. There's really no way to get around it.
/r/MensRights25/08/17 05:52 PM
9

No. OP asked a question. Answer it or move on.
/r/MensRights12/08/17 03:04 PM
1

This comment is meta as fuck. Have an upvote.
/r/MensRights12/08/17 03:01 PM
2

It's beyond reasonable to assume that firms pay salaries that reflect the value of the employee. The same way as we shop at discount stores to find bread at bargain prices so as to get the most money for our dollar. See! I can do that too. You have yet to squash his point.
/r/MensRights31/07/17 08:42 PM
2

You've made a lot of assumptions there. And you still haven't addressed the refutation of your point. The user in question made a valid point of how a free market can produce an uneven wage in favor of men as OP describes.
/r/MensRights31/07/17 07:55 PM
2

Your point was refuted in the previous comment. Pay attention.
/r/MensRights31/07/17 07:33 PM
1

Hostile Not Hostel.
/r/MensRights28/07/17 10:38 AM
1

Not quite, but nice try though.
/r/MensRights23/07/17 08:18 PM
2

Not at all. I just expect a certain level of respect. Don't you?
/r/MensRights23/07/17 05:31 PM
2

Checking to see that it was properly randomized and controlled. Then checking to see that the conclusion is properly supported by a realistic, rigorous p-value. "Vetted it's methods" Also, if you're going to quote me, the least you can do is make sure your spelling is correct. Your misspelled quote reads: "Vetted it is methods".
/r/MensRights23/07/17 04:55 PM
-3

No they don't. If anything, it's the small group of MRMs who are hyper-feminized "Nice Guys" that are doing that. Seriously, there was just a post here yesterday (though I haven't vetted its methods) that claims that men who discuss their feelings may actually be increasing their stress levels by doing so. Your body is not the same as a woman's. There are innate biological differences that provoke a different way of being. The only "Macho Bullshit" I see is the constant fucking white knighting.
/r/MensRights23/07/17 02:43 PM
11

Report is biased. Not only was it voluntary response, it was funded by organizations dedicated to generating an image of inequality in favor of women. METHODOLOGY This report draws upon government data from the Current Population Survey (CPS), American Community Survey (ACS), and the Occupational Employment Statistics (OES), as well as from numerous secondary sources. Data were also drawn from the focus groups, interviews, and over 4,300 surveys of restaurant workers detailed in previous reports…
/r/MensRights10/07/17 06:25 PM
1

Fruit is okay because of the fiber in it. I would avoid fruit juices though.
/r/TheRedPill16/06/17 02:54 AM
1

What about Lustig? As long as his points hold, sugar is a no-go. Regardless, the difference going (mostly) sugar-free has made for me makes me a believer.
/r/TheRedPill16/06/17 02:52 AM
1

Wow. Well put. I've been watching a lot of Jordan Peterson lately and you echo a theme he has about social hierarchy and God's placement in it all. He mentions the idea that we create God at all levels of our hierarchy and look for validation from the next higher step. He argues that we need to stop doing that and instead either not seek validation, because it is useless, or seek validation from only the highest tier, so that we are not taken advantage of. Your message resonates with his quite w…
/r/TheRedPill30/05/17 10:20 AM
7

"I have a boyfriend." is, most times, a shit test. You have a boyfriend? Really? And you're out on a Saturday night dressed to kill and at a bar with your girlfriend? Sure. And I'm married. She's at home watching the younguns. Everybody shit tests, but women shit test even if they like you or want you.
/r/TheRedPill22/05/17 10:34 AM
1

Sidebar. On a side note: Are people really posting here before reading Rollo?
/r/TheRedPill16/05/17 09:03 AM
2

"Ballpark". Just another word for leagues. There are no leagues or ballparks. There is only attraction or no attraction. Either way, you gotta make a move to find out if there is any.
/r/TheRedPill15/05/17 07:44 PM
1

Fight. Go join a dojo. Something full contact. When it comes to building confidence, nothing compares to getting your ass kicked. When you hold your own against someone better than you, everything else becomes easy.
/r/TheRedPill14/05/17 04:54 PM
2

Absolutely. I owe you a debt of gratitude for pointing this out.
/r/TheRedPill06/05/17 05:56 AM
2

Went out tonight. Went out of my element multiple times. Made it a point to compliment at least 4 girls at every bar we hit. How did your night compare?
/r/TheRedPill06/05/17 05:54 AM
2

About 800/month in alimony for two years. About 100/month in CS. And 16% of my pension. Other than that, I'm okay. I work a little extra for spending money.
/r/TheRedPill05/05/17 07:17 PM
3

My buddy is too nice. He made her feel about as attractive as a piece of wood.
/r/TheRedPill05/05/17 07:16 PM
9

Thanks. Heading out tonight. Feeling confident as fuck and am not concerned with the outcome; only going to have fun and flirt with women.
/r/TheRedPill05/05/17 07:14 PM
7

A fat guy doesn't fuck. You're right, but I'm not as bad as I made it out. I'm 5'7" at 205lbs. I've lost close to 40 lbs since last year by eating right, exercising, and lifting. I still have a long way to go, but I'm light years ahead of where I was just a year ago. The post was more to report on the consistencies of what has been taught here and how well it worked. Instead of doing something useful with his life he chooses to wallow in self pity and tries to get external validation from a subr…
/r/TheRedPill05/05/17 10:01 AM
1

Was feeling this as well. Remember reading that when a girl is in your frame, she reverts to being a child. Saw that in both cases.
/r/TheRedPill05/05/17 12:20 AM
4

Sidebar, please. Your outright hostility towards women is not redpill. No one here is mad at women for being women.
/r/TheRedPill04/05/17 09:55 AM
8

Dude. There are 5 stages. You're stuck on stage 2.
/r/TheRedPill04/05/17 02:12 AM
1

Thanks. That makes sense. Will do.
/r/TheRedPill04/05/17 01:12 AM
2

I would have suggested giving him a copy of The Rational Male. What are your thoughts on young (Junior/Senior in HS) boys having access to it? Asking for my son and my nephews.
/r/TheRedPill03/05/17 11:31 PM
2

That's it in a nutshell. The work aspect has no bearing on you. Best to just handle the shit test properly and let her sort out the work thing. She's a big girl. Be a bigger man and be what she needs you to be.
/r/TheRedPill29/04/17 11:11 PM
4

I said/did things I would never have otherwise because if she can't resolve the situation and manager/HR finds out the wrong way and gets the wrong idea, she could be fired. Title IX and HR are not to be fucked with if it's avoidable. This has no bearing on the issue. You are missing the point completely. By forcing her to go to HR, you are making her LEAD. By showing concern, you're removing your masculine role from the relationship and forcing it on her. She doesn't want it. She wants you to t…
/r/TheRedPill29/04/17 10:50 PM
11

I may be doing just that, and you may turn out to be completely right about all of it, but I think it's more that I prefer to have hard evidence before deciding this is an issue of cheating. You'll never have hard evidence. And whether or not it's an issue of cheating, it's definitely a shit test. And you're not passing it. Your entire frame was one of worry and concern. I feel like there were only two successful ways of handling it: A) Ignore it. "Oh that's nice honey." or B) "He wants to grab …
/r/TheRedPill29/04/17 10:45 PM
103

He is technically neither innocent nor guilty, however this accusation is leaving a dark cloud over his name and ultimately his career right now. No. Just no. He is innocent until proven guilty. Court of public opinion be damned.
/r/TheRedPill27/04/17 12:40 AM
3

To address this: they were basically broken up, and were trying to work things out intermittently. They had been seeing other people. At this point, it was inevitable. Doing it via text was probably best, as it let them avoid any emotional interference the other persons reaction might have caused.
/r/TheRedPill26/04/17 09:57 AM
3

Anger is only the second stage, brother. You need to get to acceptance. Make sure you've read up on the items on the sidebar, they help with the transition.
/r/TheRedPill26/04/17 09:53 AM
4

Have the kids; don't get married. And have your shit together to be able to fight for and win half custody. This will minimize the necessary child support (in NJ at least) and also free you from being financially raped in divorce. I currently co-parent and we are amicable and always do what's best for the kids. Both of my kids are well-adjusted and happy. But I am post divorce and paying an absurd amount in alimony for the next two years. Plus she gets part of my pension. It was agonizing to go …
/r/TheRedPill23/04/17 04:39 PM
1

You have to let her go. To really see how much you have, how much is out there, you have to first learn to let it all go. It's going to be hard, brother. But when time has passed you will look back and see how many signs there were; how much suffering was needless. Focus on being free. There are many more women out there who are interested in you. You simply haven't met them yet. It takes time, but you will. And if you read The Rational Male and really study what he's saying, you will get a bett…
/r/TheRedPill22/04/17 11:40 PM
2

I've been divorced for about 6 months now and have two kids, 8 and 6. I don't find it hard at all. I keep a clean place, work hard, and go out a couple of times a month to make friends and maybe meet someone. I've been dating since about 2 weeks after my divorce and have found no problem with women. I don't mention my kids. No need. If we head back to my place it's usually dark and I just close the doors to their rooms. They keep their stuff in their rooms and I teach them to be neat, so there's…
/r/TheRedPill20/04/17 11:30 PM
1

Because you are using your eyes for the first time. That sickness, that stomach turning is the feeling of waking up. You've been asleep too long, friend, thinking that women were some idealogical unicorn. You're finally waking up to the idea that the unicorn doesn't exist. There's good news though. It gets better. Keep reading the sidebar and follow this rabbit hole. It goes deep, but the reality that remains after waking is far better than the illusion you were in before.
/r/TheRedPill20/04/17 04:22 AM
1

It seems as though you took offense to a post that really didn't seem to bother anyone else. Calm down captain. Ironic enough, as your post echoes this. You seem to have taken offense to the posts that are on here. You've offered nothing in the way of insight and have instead used this post to brag about yourself and rationalize your own unhappiness If someone were to ask me why you posted this, I would argue that you posted it because you're not enjoying yourself while you're out there gaming. …
/r/TheRedPill18/04/17 10:22 AM
3

The rest of my time I use doing everything else. Work, doing things with/for my kids, just relaxing/having fun. The point of the three is that it reduces the amount you focus on daily into three concrete topics that will get you where you want to be without overwhelming you. And tbh, these are the three most important things you have to concern yourself with. For me, the remaining "free" time is used playing Overwatch or CSGO and just relaxing. Maybe getting some extra sleep. Sometimes I just go…
/r/TheRedPill15/04/17 03:20 PM
21

My recommendation, and the one that was given to me, is to focus on three things each day. 1). Your body. Make it better. Doesn't matter how. Eat better today. Exercise. Get a nice suit. Doesn't matter. Better your body in one way each day. 2). Your home. Make it better. Change something. Clean. Whatever you do, leave it better than you found it this morning. 3). Your mission. You know who you want to be in 5 years. Do something towards that. Doesn't have to be much. Read a chapter. Write a para…
/r/TheRedPill15/04/17 03:06 PM
2

I'd be willing to bet money if he finished the work she'd try to reconcile. If he's worried about her "winning", he could use this to shut her down for good. He'd probably feel better about it all around. Edits: bet and shut.
/r/TheRedPill10/04/17 05:35 PM
2

BUT, what's the deal 95% of muslims are essentially SJW losers- what do these people do to be branded as such. And all the other demographics listed here can I have some example is the things they do. Secondly are these numbers legit or random statistics and you know that,for example, all 9 out of 10 muslims are 'SJW losers' Yes I know there are 5% that aren't but please don't let these people define that whole demographic- know that there are good people in these demographics He's not suggestin…
/r/TheRedPill06/04/17 08:21 PM
1

Could convince a judge/jury. Could fail spectacularly. My point was why take the chance? Just call the police and have her removed.
/r/PussyPassDenied01/04/17 05:08 PM
1

Only people who don't have much in the first place are afraid of "[giving] away too much of yourself". And only people who are weak are afraid of "[putting] too much of yourself out there". Context. It matters. You done fucked up and gave away too much of yourself. You put too much of yourself out there too soon to someone who wasn't showing you clear signs of reciprocation. The important part there was "someone who wasn't showing you clear signs of reciprocation". But you're more interested in …
/r/TheRedPill29/03/17 11:46 PM
1

Try again. You're either stubborn, or your reading comprehension is at a 3rd grade level.
/r/TheRedPill29/03/17 11:18 PM
2

u/Adi2208 First off, u/seeof offers terrible advice. u/seeof is suggesting that your experience with this woman is atypical and not something that should really change your approach. This is flat-out wrong. If it was atypical, subs like this wouldn't exist. Yet here we are. Of course you should learn from this experience. To not do so would be counter-evolutionary. This experiment of yours was a failure. You done fucked up and gave away too much of yourself. You put too much of yourself out ther…
/r/TheRedPill29/03/17 11:15 PM
1

Yes, he hunted a unicorn. But hey, that's over now and part of your past. And really nothing to ashamed of. Trying to shame somebody for falling in love is a typical behavior of a wannabe alpha. Someone needs to read the forum rules a bit more, but it ain't me. If you can't hack it, don't dish it.
/r/TheRedPill29/03/17 11:05 PM
1

men who always insist on driving the car and refuse sitting next to women driving them are not "on the pedestal", but obviously have a lack of self-confidence. The same for falling in love. Never said that. I have no problem letting a woman drive. Also have no problem with "love" as you put it (having a relationship, as we in the mature world put it). Yes, he hunted a unicorn. But hey, that's over now and part of your past. And really nothing to ashamed of. Trying to shame somebody for falling i…
/r/TheRedPill29/03/17 10:53 PM
2

Blew my shoulder out of its socket taking an ogoshi in '07. Re-set it in the bathroom of the dojo and hit the gym two days later. Still hurts like fuck if I don't work it out every couple of days. Exercise is the ONLY way to recover. Just start light and work up to what you can handle. No Arnold shit. Know your limits.
/r/TheRedPill29/03/17 02:12 AM
2

He did a lot of things wrong. He emascualted himself. He put her on a pedestal. He turned down other, worthy, prospects in chase of the unicorn. He went back on his promise to himself to drop her multiple times. All of this screams of a lack of self-respect. He's owning up to it now though, so in time, he should be ok. And what kind of bullshit is "Even if it doesn't work out at the end, falling in love is something beautiful."? He didn't fall in love. He doted over her and she rebuffed him earl…
/r/TheRedPill29/03/17 02:09 AM
2

Because he took her somewhere against her will. Not saying it is, that's for a jury/judge to decide. Just saying he's better off avoiding that whole scenario.
/r/PussyPassDenied15/03/17 04:53 AM
1

Wish he could do that. Might be misconstrued as kidnapping. Better safe than sorry.
/r/PussyPassDenied14/03/17 09:18 PM
124

From cruel schoolyard taunts to a child about his mother, to the possible threat of abuse a mother might be exposed to if her past is revealed in such a heated situation (from either male partner), it is not hard to imagine how the shock waves of a law like this may affect lives for the worse. And if these relationships have been violent, abusive or involved drug and alcohol misuse, then the potential is far worse. LMAO. But the indentured servitude of the man is fine? For a child that's NOT HIS…
/r/MensRights02/09/16 01:36 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter