TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

relativecaution Archive

View 0 posts and 115 comments by relativecaution on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Honestly you could try present one for other people but I have heard it directly from the horses mouth too many times.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/26 04:18 AM
–

Please women, refute this. So I can go ahead and laugh because women don't even have the self-awareness to hide it - they outright say so constantly.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/26 02:02 AM
0

Zing
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/26 11:32 PM
1

Yeah, really good examples. You hear a lot about people struggling with not being able to cook and being able to run a mile. You are so out of touch. And no I'm not a communist. You're a clown though. Have a good day
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/26 11:28 PM
–

Nope.. I'm not working at a fortune500 company but I'm not poor or ugly. I just don't look at people who are given shit decks in life and think the kind of elitist shit that you do. Really living up to the stereotypes of the kind of people who live in these ivory towers though, lol
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/26 11:24 PM
–

No I believe it's empathy. There is a serious lack of it, as in genuine empathy. Not the virtue signalling kind that is attributed to a bunch of social movements. For example, just putting yourself in the shoes of a particularly unattractive woman who hasn't been afforded the same opportunities you have in life. Because the only reason why you feel the way you do is because you are at the top of a hierarchy? You following?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/26 11:21 PM
–

Everyone knows life isn't fair. Actually confronting and fleshing it out, acknowledging other peoples experiences - as opposed to handwaving based on your own privileged position
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/26 11:18 PM
–

Maybe not point to your fortune500 company and its constituents as examples of why blackpill ideology shouldn't exist. Maybe you could extrapolate other people's experiences and show a bit of empathy? Like if you weren't attractive, afforded opportunities that gave you a cushy job, you wouldn't have this mentality?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/26 11:15 PM
–

Your boss is an extreme example, like less than 1 percentile. Also, in line with blackpill ideology, aren't shorter man discriminated against in terms of achieving high status positions?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/26 11:13 PM
–

Akin to the misanthropy inherent in our society? If you haven't noticed people aren't having a good time and there isn't a lot of evidence that our societies are particularly humanist. Extra points if you want to undermine this and pretend this isn't the case - right in line with your fortune500 company mentality lmfao
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/26 11:11 PM
–

Man thank fuck your comment is here because I immediately was like "what do you mean you don't ponder gender dynamics???"
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/26 11:07 PM
–

Take a deep breath, THEN write your comment.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/26 11:05 PM
–

Reality is blackpilling. It's inherently blackpilling, life is suffering, organisms survive by eating other organisms, people are discarded by the society around them yadda yadda etc. If you haven't noticed - when you dig deeper many things are actually quite fucked up, as in normal features of our society. Live in a first world country and enjoy the material successes of this? Well it's predicated on exploitation of resources and slavery. There is just a veneer of niceties, and a lot of bullshi…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/26 11:03 PM
1

Idk man, the world is getting better. I guess you're right. I don't know by what indicators, and the zeitgeist suggests people aren't having a good time but okay, let's just go with the world is getting better. If it makes you feel better I'll say it too
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/26 09:31 PM
1

True but there is still trends that are evident over say, the last 40 years. Women's antidepressant use as another example, again in recent years. Again, things are clearly not getting better
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/26 01:01 PM
1

Cmon.. why did you have to say some nonsense like that..
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/26 11:47 PM
1

How about mental illness, depression and anxiety broadly? How's that for a metric then?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/26 11:46 PM
–

I think you've been conditioned to overlook the negative. It's very silly to push aside quality of life, people's general level of happiness, cost of living, living pressures, and to point to some poverty metric in some third world country. They are essentially different things. You are conflating them.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/26 11:38 PM
1

Okay but for example.. our phone in our pockets is exactly one of the reasons why everyone is so brainwashed, too aware, irritable, and not connected to their surroundings. Not being able to afford property, choosing not to reproduce due to economic and existentialist (the world is fucked for x reason), dwindling job market, zero hope in the cultural zeitgeist.. The world isn't becoming better, everyone knows this, and some niche technological advancements and leukaemia potentially having a cure…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/26 10:48 PM
–

Yeah but it was tbe exact schtick he peddled and it was borderline propaganda. It literally conditions people to overlook how bad the world is getting. This is crazy land, lol
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/26 10:45 PM
–

Well it's delusional and you've been listening to Jordan Paterson or something, but if it makes you feel better, then I guess hold onto it lol
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/26 10:40 PM
1

Those things are all nice but they haven't remotely touched on the changes in my own society (Australia). Our society isn't better - it's clear people are stressed and less hopeful they have been in recent times. Talking about scientific advancements and world poverty doesn't have anything to do with this and being like "well at least there is some technology around today" has nothing to do with it. So your metrics are interesting, but there is doom and gloom, and you are staring directly into t…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/26 10:39 PM
1

Hey, I promise I'm not being weird - I'm just curious. You may be the most based and normal woman ive seen on PPD and i always enjoy your contributions. But how old are you and what nationality are you? Again, not being weird and I do not intend on replying to your answer, I just want to know.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/26 06:25 AM
3

It is bad tf lmao.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/26 05:49 AM
1

Do you genuinely believe the world is better than it was 10 of 20 years ago?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/26 05:49 AM
2

Haha who told you this? Do you really believe it?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/26 05:48 AM
1

No not at all, your perspective sounds much nicer and better. I just think it's very idealistic and not really in line with reality
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/26 12:15 PM
–

I guess you are just blue pilled. Lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/26 04:13 AM
–

Is that an "all men are created equal" platitude? Clearly people are valued differently, we can literally watch it play out.. And I really don't understand what the point is of the second paragraph. Who is "ourselves"? The human race? Why are you equating all individuals to each other and attributing blame to everyone? I don't understand
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/26 09:54 AM
3

That's a strange example to provide. It's more so just mating and dynamics that have existed for thousands of years. Women are more valuable.. as evidenced by biology and animal behaviours that are demonstrated over the entire animal kingdom. That's why men have to compete to be sexually selected by women.. and just like it has been since the dawn of time.. many men are left out of the dating market. Now add the female contraceptive pill, the layers of modernity, and voila, you have what we have…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/26 09:25 AM
3

It’s like when men go “I don’t know any of my buddies who are pushy” but, like, every woman knows that when men get horny they are often inadvertently (or sometimes purposefully) pushy. Heterosexual men probably know way more about what dating heterosexual women is like. More than other hetero women. And the inverse is true too. This analogy and the point, are well, on point
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/26 01:07 PM
3

I mean, he made a solid argument though :(
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/26 01:01 PM
2

Yaaas queen, let's drive up the irrational fearmongering mentality based on the curated media cycle that is lead by psychos while acting as an agent of drama and hysteria in your own life!! Yaaaass
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/26 11:56 PM
1

Highlighting the news cycle showing so horrible shit in the vast population is a dog shit example. You can temper your ridiculous take with the fact that sexism in its watered down forms are around us, from both sexes.. Yeah.. maybe you could just turn down the drama a notch and be just a tad more down to earth.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/26 11:25 PM
-1

Media highlights fucked up shit... that's what gets engagement. Audible gasp, women do sexist shit too. Why is this representative of the entire environment? Why are you making this the representation of your every day life?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/26 10:45 PM
1

You are though. You describe a reality that is some hellscape with the worst elements shoved to the front. It's ridiculously biased.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/26 10:27 PM
10

This is the exact set of assumptions and logic behind racism lmfao
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/26 10:21 PM
3

I don't know how that relates but okay
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/26 06:19 AM
6

Not everyone is so openly full of hate and vindictiveness like you. But good on you for owning it.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/26 06:02 AM
8

Okay. Please keep being honest about it because there is a lot of this mentality around, it's just subverted by pretending to be something else. Wear your heart on your sleeve girl ❤️
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/26 05:43 AM
16

I appreciate that you are honest about it but that is an objectively cunty thing to believe.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/26 12:05 AM
3

The dynamic is definitely different in an established relationship, that's for sure
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/26 12:47 PM
3

Alright, lillth
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/26 12:33 PM
2

Yeah. That's right haha, I agree also
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/26 12:20 PM
3

Not sure what you mean here but it's not really a mindset, it's more just not hamstringing the clear goal that is driving them. Men aren't going to hamper their odds of getting laid if it's also ready stacked against their favour. Men don't get to decide anything in the sex domain lol, women set the standard since they are the gatekeepers of sex
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/26 12:18 PM
3

Because the opportunity for sexual access trumps some principled egalitarian desire. It's obviously not about that. I'm not sure what the public discourse or memes being thrown around but often the zeitgeist is some dumbed down divisive representation of the sentiment, anyway. The reason why it's get so much tract,as I see it, is that it is a blatant and easy to point to example of how disinterested society is in removing rigid gender roles as they pertain to men, in the name of egalitarianism, …
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/26 11:16 AM
1

I agreed with everything you said. I was being lazy in my response but based is a good thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/26 05:16 PM
1

Based
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/26 05:56 AM
2

Maybe women and society broadly can just simply recognise that men are collateral and are the ones who give the ultimate sacrifice and it is just worthwhile giving them kudos for this and saying "shit, men do get the shit end of the stick in a bunch of ways too". It might actually bolster and make it worthwhile for one to defend their own nation - not that I support the notion that men should be forced to throw their lives away as cannonfodder.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/26 02:52 AM
1

Awesome dude. Going to a forum which is a platform for discourse and debate and engaging in neither, what a great use of your time. Have fun
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/26 11:52 AM
1

I'm free to tell you to shut up and stop derailing tbe conversation. You are free to continue being a clown. Is there a problem?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/26 11:47 AM
1

You are free to just be quiet unless you have something to share.. yet here we are
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/26 11:38 AM
4

Great contribution bro, big clap
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/26 11:37 AM
2

What the hell is the point in commenting. I think people should disregard your comments as irrelevant lmao
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/26 11:37 AM
4

I mean.. it's not very personalised if simply being a man has the connotation of something to be afraid of..
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/26 11:55 PM
2

This was unhinged.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/26 01:06 AM
0

???
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/26 07:00 AM
4

Please keep doubling down. It's so good.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/26 01:10 AM
9

That's just.. patently untrue. Just because you haven't seen it doesn't mean it's not true.. If your only frame of reference is your own experience then you need to open up your horizons. I've never seen a woman be sexually assaulted.. do you think tbat means that women aren't sexually assaulted? Are you 15?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/26 01:08 AM
2

It's a problem because it's an indicator of a healthy and prosperous society, e.g. many people actively choose not to reproduce due to the economic state of things. Unless you are the government or have an hypercapitalistic mindset and view the state of affairs through solely a GDP mindset, you shouldn't be celebrating the excess reproduction that happens in the third world at a rate much larger than Western countries can already not sustain. How can you be so confident saying this boggles my mi…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/26 05:23 AM
1

Birth replacement rate, sociological studies into behaviour surrounding mating and dating, emerging social trends, people sharing frustration and these sort of sentiments earnestly aren't just a rise in angry tik tok vids, that is reductionist as hell and frankly, a stupid thing to say.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/26 04:52 AM
1

Hurr durr, nice analysis bro. Just remove all the people talking about the clearly real phenomenon that is evidenced by a million different metrics and society will be back to normal. Really impressive critical thought. Amazing stuff.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/26 04:25 AM
3

I'm not sure a 'casual glance outside' is a good representative of reality. People say this all the time.. meanwhile the state of relationships and the discourse is worse than ever. It's clearly a bias..
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/26 01:51 AM
7

The world runs on exploitation that is true.. looking at you USA. But it does not necessitate that a country like Australia should import large amount of immigrants just to sustain its GDP. Do you genuinely believe that large scale immigration from less developed countries is done out of altruism? You cant be this naive. You are re-branding a shitty practice as something that is good.. You are unironically supporting something that is done out of pure capitalistic interest with no care or consid…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/26 01:03 AM
4

Are you being daft??? It's literally the same set of assumptions and underlying reasoning.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/26 04:15 PM
2

That isn't true, I'm pretty sure there are studies on this that suggest the opposite, or at least a more complicated picture.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/26 01:36 PM
4

Lmao
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/26 11:58 AM
13

It's so good
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/26 11:58 AM
10

Fuck, your comment is both apt, and hilarious
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/26 11:57 AM
–

I'm sorry but who the hell is in denial of men screwing over men? Government officials, politicians, academia, essentially all institutions are primarily lead by men.. they don't even recognise men as a class of people, forget even creating frameworks akin to feminism to support and uplifting men.. like this strawman is so dumb
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/26 02:15 PM
–

You mean the men who have nothing in common with 99.9% of men? By that metric I see your point.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/26 02:11 PM
–

Physical strength and stature are pretty universal markers of masculinity but generally speaking, yeah I agree with you.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/26 07:36 AM
–

Well, it's within a western framework isn't it? Aren't we talking about how Asian people are perceived within the western world?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/26 05:06 AM
2

Are you fucking with me? I'm the person who said there is no tate equivalent lmfao. I didn't flip flop. I literally said tbe while premise of cantering the argument on one guy to describe a whole landscape is stupid, and it is stupid. Do you do this gaslighting shit irl or is it just reserved for reddit where you have unlimited opportunity to unleash your autism?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 11:17 PM
1

Hahaha you are so confidently wrong. I already said there isn't an equivalent. It's almost like I've been saying this whole time why are we focusing on the sex crimes of 1 man, there isn't a Tate equivalent, and it's derailing the discussion. It's not the point I'm trying to prove to you, you moron. I feel like you need this win, you're getting desperate. You can just take it :)
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 10:32 PM
2

Haha, did you really think that was a good line?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 03:36 PM
1

Okay. We will completely reverse reality so as to make radical feminists spokespersons controversial and to have daily publicity from mainstream newspapers. We will completely revert the state of affairs as to give this situation a remotely equal footing. Oh wait, that's retarded!
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 03:35 PM
2

Yes the manosphere documentary that has onlyfans models and manosphere guys working in cohesion with one another. No, I'm saying that one guy doing sex trafficking doesn't mean you get to point to him as an example and say "look, this means misandry isn't nearly as misogyny!", whilst missing 99% of the general landscape. Again, missing the forest for the trees.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 03:33 PM
2

Yes.. Tate doesn't represent every manosphere participant or influencer. His egregious criminal activity is unique to him.. throwing that aspersion out there removes the focus from the general landscape, e.g. the prevalence of misogynist and misandrist influencers, and is an obvious rhetorical device used by the commenter to imply "misandrists pale in comparison to the REAL evil, misogynists!!" Yes I know that the op made a reference to Tate.. what the hell is your point?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 03:24 PM
1

Are you kidding me? The comment thread is about misandrist and misogynist influencers. Some random commenter pulled andrew Tate out of a hat and said his criminal activity has no match for a misandrist influencer and somehow made that the new goalpost. Tate is one guy and his criminal behaviour isn't the focus of the topic. Him being a freak doesn't disqualify the fact that misandrist influencers are everywhere. Talk about derailing a discussion..
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 03:13 PM
3

I think your point is that Tate is a criminal and gross and okay i get it.. but that's one guy that was made the poster boy of red pill.. focusing on his criminal activity instead of the general landscape is missing the forest for the trees. You are excusing and overlooking tbe commonality and prevalence of anti-men and misandrist content because Andrew Tate is a creep and a criminal.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/26 08:07 AM
11

How can there be a Tate equivalent? Tate is known for being a reactionary and controversial. Women can say outlandishly sexist stuff and it will never be met with the same regard as some someone like Tate. Anyway, Clementine ford.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/26 06:55 AM
0

While you are right there is absolutely a problem with how women are socially conditioned and incentivised. I don't take the route of men bad, women bad, people are products of their environment. Yes, women overwhelmingly support moral and political causes, display behaviours thst are not conducive to social cohesion, but I absolutely believe a lot of this has been co-opted. If you were conditioned by frameworks that repeatedly told you the other sex is to blame for all of societal ills and you …
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/26 03:05 AM
1

Well, immediate male role models are far superior to one's present in the surrounding culture but okay, there still is no good male role models that are being shown to boys and men. Why is that do you think? Ahh, so not actually addressing the underlying cause or why it is the case. Just some weird castigating and more "protect wahmen" rhetoric. That'll surely make things better!!
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/26 10:38 AM
1

You mean the fragmentation of family units and prevalence f single parent households? The lack of guidance generationally for men? The blatant and in your face demonisation of men by media, academia, basically all institutions?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/26 01:01 PM
1

I believe he is referring to movements of men collectivising and sharing grievancs
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/26 09:06 PM
1

I understand. Its rough out here. Have a good night.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/26 06:26 PM
1

It just seems like a strange thing to suddenly pull the brakes on considering the current state of mating and dating. How doesn't it boil down to morals to have sex with 50 people? To have sex with someone else while courting another as a potential romantic prospect? All of it boils down the morals but it seems bizarre to suddenly draw the line at people preferring virgins.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/26 05:49 PM
1

Okay, fair enough.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/26 05:44 PM
1

Preferring a virgin or a woman with limited sexual experience doesn't have to be nested in a moral judgement. And secondly, you are choosing to view it solely through the lens of a moral judgement. It doesn't matter if it's through a moral judgement lens or not, both male and female selection can be brutally exclusionary, nesting this particular preference in a moral judgement lens doesn't frickin' matter.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/26 05:31 PM
1

What about wanting someone who makes a lot of money when you don't make as much yourself?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/26 05:16 PM
2

Okay I think I'm going to pass now. Yes a handful of men in government that have nothing to do with 99% of men. Have a good night.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/26 05:10 PM
0

Jesus christ wall of text. I stopped reading when you accused me of making a straw man that Australian and Afghanistan. I'll pass on the bad faith arguing. Have a good night.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/26 05:09 PM
2

I know... I agree.. I'm not sure what point you thought i was making that made you respond like that. But if you just wanted to share an interesting titbit then yeah, it's messed up.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/26 04:02 PM
2

The hypothetical should be nested in reality otherwise what is the point apart from writing fictional pieces. Men don't collectivise on essentially anything, society absolutely bars it and shoots it down. Not from some victim mindset because I am a male, but because there is vested interest in making this the case. It's just.. there isn't a remotely close equivalent to feminism for men, a framework to explore male identity, societal pressure against men, legal and ethical supports or representat…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/26 03:43 PM
3

You're right, real palpable patriarchy exists in most of the world today and exists in various forms. These countries and cultures didn't magically implement this form of female subjugation because men en masse wanted to enslave women. It comes from regressive moral belief systems, a refusal to separate church from state, economic prosperity, having the democratic means and financial means to support such a system. Again, this is not remotely related to men en masse collectivising to support the…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/26 03:30 PM
2

Haha yeah
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/26 01:34 PM
2

Yeah.. we've got weird fringe manosphere cos players that really don't represent a threat but could in the distant future, probably not though. Also far from being representative of men as a whole but yeah, it could happen one day. Perhaps society, feminism, the current state of affairs should do some reflecting on how they actively cause they sentiments to fester and for these groups to form, probably not though right?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/26 01:32 PM
3

Okay now I understand how you are thinking about this. Men are the ones that have the ability of applying force and will do so under certain conditions. I feel lile women do too but not nearly to the same extent as men, which is largely due to physical difference. None of these men are collectivising under the banner of 'masculinity' or 'men' or are furthering the interests, rights, and privileges of men. There is no equivalent to women and feminism in this regard. I think you are thinking about…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/26 01:10 PM
2

Sure, but these men collecrivise around being foot soldiers for the government, they don't collectivise on the basis of men or men's interests. Also back to the dictators - people have protesting maduro for decades while demonstrating zero ability of actually disrupting his regime. It wasn't 'men' of Venezuela that took him out, it was the US government, right? I think we are conflating men as the foot soldiers of governments and the non-existent men as a class of people, representing men and th…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/26 01:06 PM
1

Yeah.. I'm not going to bother. You clearly have a biased perspective so you're going to be looking at this within a very myopic lens.. so what's the point in even engaging
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/26 01:03 PM
4

Yeah... what's the point of these hypothetical situations? It's not going to happen, is it?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/26 01:02 PM
4

That's a good point, I understand. But that is people revolting against the government.. there is no evidence of men en masse revolting against governments collectively on the basis of being men, or to further the interest of men, or just any collectivised class action of men. It just seems like a pointless distinction to make apart from "if there js gonna be any revolting, the dudes are actually gonna be able to apply force"
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/26 11:42 AM
2

The same applies to men...
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/26 11:37 AM
2

Holy shit. How do you not understand how stupid this idea is.. MEN DONT EVER COLLECTIVISE. WHAT HAPPENED IN 1979 IN IRAN WAS NOT MEN COLLECTIVISING TO ENSLAVE WOMEN. DO YOU UNDERSTAND?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/26 11:31 AM
1

Yeah.. do you think that men just decided to en masse enslave women? Or was it the US destabilising the country, installing a puppet dictator, and regressing everything? Think bigger... not in these silly black and white terms.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/26 11:24 AM
7

Okay I'm following.. But it's a useless distinction to make. There is no collevidation of men en masse, men don't seem to defend/unionise/collectivise on the basis of their class as men. I'm saying that it doesn't matter. It doesn't dictate how rights and privileges are dispensed to women, there is no asking men en masse to defend their rights and privileges. The men who dictate laws and and allow these rights and privileges to be given to women have literally nothing to do with 99.5% of men, th…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/26 11:20 AM
5

I'm sorry but what... A purely hypothetical scenario that has no foreseeable way of manifesting is considered true to you? Do you think there is much utility in thought experiments that have no basis in reality? What the hell, honestly...
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/26 11:14 AM
7

Yeah except that would never happen since men can't even collectivise on giving a shit about other men, so...
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/26 11:08 AM
0

I don't understand what you are trying to articulate or how this relates to the original comment. Could you please clarify
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/26 08:48 AM
13

Men can overpower women physically.. yet this translates to absolutely zero tangible benefit to them in regards to rights and privileges. Your whole supposition doesn't make sense.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/26 06:10 AM
12

How is it true? Men are more physically powerful than women yet they literally have no power as a class of people. It literally falls on its face as soon as you begin to explore this supposition.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/26 06:07 AM
1

Brother......... you didn't elaborate. Again. This was dumb as fuck. Going to work now, have a good day.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/26 11:35 PM
–

Really thought provooking. Probably the dumbest post I've seen on here
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/26 11:23 PM
1

No it isn't. You say lmao as one word
/r/BlackPillScience03/08/25 11:13 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter