TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

remotaholic Archive

View 2 posts and 142 comments by remotaholic on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
6

/r/etttpg Let's get the ball rolling guys!
/r/MensRights15/07/15 06:25 AM
-5

Wouldn't that be painful for the child?
/r/MensRights21/06/15 05:40 PM
3

This link should work
/r/MensRights20/06/15 09:35 PM
9

Sarcasm is common on this sub.
/r/MensRights17/06/15 08:28 PM
1

People can have differing opinions within the same movement.
/r/MensRights16/06/15 05:49 PM
1

Almost every one of those campaigns has been promoted and supported on this sub. They're doing great things, and we're very glad they exist. However, these are not run by the same feminists we're talking about on this post. The feminist community is large and diverse, and the loudest voices often seem to ignore these issues, or actively diminish them. That's the point OP was making. As for your request, here is a relevant comment with some links you may find useful.
/r/MensRights16/06/15 03:32 PM
5

Yes, technically this is sexual assault, but the standard sentence is quite similar.
/r/MensRights14/06/15 10:14 PM
7

*claps* well done for you. now pat yourself on the back and leave me alone. This is how you know you have won the argument.
/r/MensRights13/06/15 09:50 AM
1

Your logic is flawed. If a man is stronger than a woman, and the woman attacks him, she is likely to use weapons such as shoes or household items that can inflict a lot of pain. However the man is not allowed to fight back, because he is stronger than her..?
/r/MensRights05/06/15 06:33 AM
1

Good point, edited for clarity.
/r/PussyPass23/05/15 03:54 PM
1

Sorry but I think you misunderstood, I meant accusers shouldn't be afraid of people believing their accusation is false.
/r/PussyPass23/05/15 02:34 PM
12

Block all communication with her. Record any unavoidable contact. Whatever you do, don't let her know your address.
/r/MensRights23/05/15 10:28 AM
-1

Accusers shouldn't be worried of punishment if their rape accusations are not proven. Innocent until proven guilty works for everyone.
/r/PussyPass22/05/15 10:34 AM
6

They're not going to change it unless people complain. Ask students what they think about it and, if enough people are opposed to it, get a petition going.
/r/MensRights21/05/15 04:52 PM
4

This was shared on my FB feed. Good to see some sanity on this subject in the mainstream.
/r/MensRights12/05/15 09:28 PM
37

Given enough flawed logic, anything positive towards men is misogyny.
/r/MensRights12/05/15 06:21 PM
22

To be fair, the more extreme forms of FGM are more horrible than circumsision. That doesn't make it okay, though.
/r/MensRights10/05/15 09:30 AM
5

M to F.
/r/MensRights06/05/15 06:44 AM
18

That doesn't negate the fact that she has purposefully exposed a 324 people to a deadly disease. There's a chance none of them would contract it, but that doesn't make it okay.
/r/MensRights26/04/15 02:48 PM
8

Although I agree the setup to that debate was unfair, I feel he needs to work on his political tact a bit if he wants people to listen to him. For instance, he tried to start making a point about domestic violence in response to an unrelated question and got shut down because of it.
/r/MensRights24/04/15 06:20 AM
2

Here's the Iplayer link
/r/MensRights23/04/15 06:51 PM
1

Listening to the debate now. It seems J4M&B are being given the opportunity to get their views out, thankfully.
/r/MensRights23/04/15 05:17 PM
20

Good to hear that you got through it all. Your experience does highlight a key issue in both society and courts though. It sucks that people would accuse you of a serious crime just to keep their credibility.
/r/MensRights21/04/15 10:37 PM
10

Related C&H
/r/MensRights21/04/15 08:22 PM
9

For anyone out of the loop, this is a response to this article which conflates the MHRM with PUA's, MGTOWs.
/r/MensRights17/04/15 08:28 PM
2

The majority of murders of women is perpetrated by men, so I consider that statement acceptable. However, They quote the statisctic of one woman being murdered every 81 hours, ignoring the fact that murder occurs against men at a much higher rate. End violence against anyone.
/r/MensRights16/04/15 04:40 PM
8

No, nobody thinks that. We focus on sexism against men because that's the point of the subreddit, because there are already plenty of spaces to discuss sexism against women. Also, we don't argue that sexism against women doesn't exist; only that it often isn't as bad as feminists like to portray it.
/r/MensRights13/04/15 09:53 AM
4

I just don't understand the point of jailing people for child support. It costs the taxpayer more money, and reduces the chance of them ever being able to pay.
/r/MensRights11/04/15 02:05 PM
2

We don't know either way. No, we shouldn't throw these accusations away, but he shouldn't be treated as if they're true until they're proven to be. The quanitity of accusations does not imply that they are true.
/r/MensRights08/04/15 11:27 AM
4

While gender discrimination definitely exists against men, I wouldn't personally call it oppression as it's not quite that extreme. Please reply: what's your opinion on this?
/r/MensRights05/04/15 11:27 PM
6

That's not related to this discussion.
/r/MensRights05/04/15 09:41 AM
2

This is really cool. Share this to anyone you think might benefit from it!
/r/MensRights02/04/15 07:22 PM
12

HAES stands for Healthy At Every Size. The basic premise is; you shouldn't care about being/becoming fat because the consequences are "purely societal". Or, so they say.
/r/MensRights31/03/15 08:14 PM
12

Misleading title. He was sentenced to 35 years but only served roughly 589 days (from the video). Still, it's horrible that this happened to him, especially the fact that he had to plead guilty.
/r/MensRights15/03/15 11:04 PM
2

Yes, I agree with you completely on that.
/r/MensRights09/03/15 05:37 PM
1

No. And again, we see the difference between blaming and preventing. Saying "the issue with women getting raped is them being out after 9" would be victim blaming, I agree. But it simply isn't the same thing if you say "women are less likely to be raped if they aren't out after 9". That could be (hypothetically, for the sake of this argument) a fact. If you're in a dangerous area with a record of such crimes, it would be advisable not to be out after 9. That doesn't mean "you deserved it because…
/r/MensRights09/03/15 05:31 PM
14

$41? That's a damned cheap campaign.
/r/MensRights06/03/15 07:28 PM
1

My school gym does this. I really don't see why it's needed - whenever I've been in there it's been about 50% male/female.
/r/MensRights05/03/15 09:18 PM
62

Well, it kind of is. But so is 'mansplaining'. It's just 'explaining'.
/r/MensRights04/03/15 07:19 PM
1

Wow, I hadn't seen this before. Thanks!
/r/MensRights15/02/15 09:29 PM
3

True, true. What I was referring to was the fact that there are more extreme forms of fgm than there are of mgm. If I'm wrong here (which I very well may be) could you please link me to some sources? Thanks.
/r/MensRights15/02/15 08:47 PM
0

No, not all. Be realistic. You're right though, there's no way a logical person could say that discrimination against men doesn't exist.
/r/MensRights15/02/15 06:24 PM
3

Circumsision is an outdated tradition that has no place in today's society. It is not directly comparable to female genital mutilaton as it is less extreme, but it still has detrimental effects and should not be done without medical reason to children. That said, there are sometimes medical reasons for circumcision, such as an infected foreskin or treating some cases of phimosis. However, the other suggested uses for it, such as preventing the spread of HIV, are statistically unsupported. The WH…
/r/MensRights15/02/15 04:08 PM
11

No, he's saying that being a man doesn't give you control over the world. Nothing more, nothing less.
/r/MensRights13/02/15 07:11 AM
3

Having skimmed the article it looks pretty balanced to me. What specific biased quotes should I be looking for?
/r/MensRights10/02/15 07:11 PM
2

Oh okay then, thanks for clarifying.
/r/MensRights10/02/15 07:09 AM
2

I'm not saying we need permission, just that we need more information. 7 people is not enough to draw conclusions from.
/r/MensRights10/02/15 06:54 AM
24

Interesting. This could be caused by pressure for the legal system to appear more diverse, but it could just as likely be that these particular people are the best they have - it's far too small a sample space to say that it's purposeful.
/r/MensRights09/02/15 10:27 PM
19

I say go to that meeting. Bring prepared arguments, and a folder full of studies and statistics. Take this opportunity to make a difference - if you just leave this group alone with their beliefs, the echoes will just get louder.
/r/MensRights04/02/15 08:25 PM
23

Could be. Doesn't matter to them. Although, that is a separate issue.
/r/MensRights31/01/15 09:46 PM
81

No, what they're saying is that if you are a woman who has suffered from domestic violence then that should give you a free pass to commit crimes.
/r/MensRights31/01/15 09:37 PM
2

In light of this news, does anyone know of a good audio recorder I can keep with me? /s
/r/MensRights29/01/15 11:24 PM
3

Great analogy.
/r/MensRights24/01/15 12:27 PM
9

The mental gymnastics in this are impressive. Example: noted MRA leader Warren Farrell advocated for the normalization and legalization of not just child sexual abuse but incest in 1977. So child sexual abuse is cool with MRAs and GamerGate alike. Yup, something a person we often agree with wrote 38 years ago is definitely our absolute belief. Also, the idea that anyone involved in GamerGate must also be an MRA.
/r/MensRights10/01/15 04:53 PM
8

Just because you're also a woman, doesn't mean you're part of the problem. Don't blame yourself for what other women do.
/r/MensRights30/12/14 10:39 PM
2

"I've gotten death threats from men's rights activists" I'm not saying these didn't happen, and if they did that must be a horrible thing to experience, but what kind of MRA actually sends death threats? I wonder if she received death threats from some random guy and assumed they were an MRA because it fits their strawman. It reminds me of the 'exposing mra\'s' account on twitter, which (mostly) takes random guys' tweets and claims they're MRAs.
/r/MensRights26/12/14 08:33 PM
9

The MRAs here just ignore that whole side of it. Although that would seem apparent from the general discussion of feminism here, I disagree that we ignore the other side. This is a place to point out and discuss issues, and sensible feminists are not an issue. People here will often say that "feminism is a hate movement", but that refers to how the feminist movement acts as a whole, rather than the smaller individual groups. I might be completely wrong about this, but I just wanted to state my o…
/r/MensRights20/12/14 08:17 PM
5

What was your post that got you banned?
/r/MensRights14/12/14 01:39 AM
3

Assuming you're not joking, it's called the "Cucumbo".
/r/MensRights09/12/14 07:18 PM
0

What makes you say that?
/r/MensRights07/12/14 01:20 AM
1

We don't (necessarily) care about equality. We care about Men's Rights. It's not that hard a concept. Men's rights = equality. That's not a hard concept either.
/r/MensRights07/12/14 01:10 AM
10

Because, as with many of the issues raised here, it is discrimination in the name of equality. I do agree with you though, far too many posts here are just reactions to feminism rather than our own content.
/r/MensRights04/12/14 08:42 PM
2

I agree with you, the mentality that women are not responsible for their actions not only hurts men, but also belittles women. It's sexist, but reverse-sexism isn't a thing.
/r/MensRights04/12/14 04:24 PM
627

Let's fight sexism... by practising sexism.
/r/MensRights04/12/14 04:15 PM
17

What makes you say that? Sexism is sexism, no matter the gender. That's kind of the point of this sub.
/r/MensRights03/12/14 08:27 PM
3

I see your point, but this isn't quite the same thing. If someone accuses another of rape and is proven to be lying, then they should be punished. They wouldn't make it automatic for the accusation not being proven to be true. Note: use of 'proven' here refers to 'beyond reasonable doubt'.
/r/MensRights03/12/14 07:40 AM
10

Definitely #2. It's just amazing how ignorant that comment is.
/r/MensRights01/12/14 11:18 PM
2

Maybe just stick post-it notes on them instead?
/r/MensRights30/11/14 10:34 PM
4

Suggestion: If you're worried about echo-chamber hate when sharing statistics, appease everyone by always pairing male with female statistics, i.e.: There are 1,270,000 female rape victims per year There are also 1,267,000 men forced to penetrate per year End violence against everyone.
/r/MensRights28/11/14 09:25 PM
12

The problem is that employers will (sometimes) be forced to hire women over men whether the woman is more skilled or not. It also means that it will be much harder to fire female workers for being unproductive, as they will have to worry about replacing them with a new female to meet their quota. I agree with you that there is a need for more even genders in companies, especially in higher up positions, but for smaller businesses this law would be a big problem.
/r/MensRights26/11/14 11:39 PM
2

I apologize, it seems I misunderstood the sub. I was just commenting on the overall theme of the discussions I saw last time I went there.
/r/MensRights26/11/14 08:17 PM
3

Both personally and as an MRA, I'm tolerant of them but disagree with their ideals. I've looked a bit at their sub and from what I've seen it seems they have some thought-provoking points concerning the principles of dating, however their ideals perpetuate traditionalism which I am very much opposed to.
/r/MensRights26/11/14 06:28 PM
2

When all you see is modern feminism, it's hard to separate it from equality feminism. In my opinion, the 'real' feminist movement should find a new name, as gender equality is no longer an issue of only female problems.
/r/MensRights24/11/14 04:49 PM
2

<s> "Hmm, I feel really violent today. I'd better go to that men's group before I accidentally punch someone " </s>
/r/MensRights22/11/14 12:37 PM
3

The reason I really can't stand this "man spreading" thing is that there's a genuine reason people do it. Try sitting on a flat seat for an hour with your legs completely together. Without being able to adjust them, your balls will be crushed. I understand the point; it's rude to take up unnecessary space, especially if the train is crowded, but there is an excuse.
/r/MensRights21/11/14 09:10 PM
2

If this is actually happening, I'm very sorry to see it and I'm sure anyone here this will agree that it is not a good policy. However it could be that these comments were removed for legitimate reasons (i.e. breaking rules). I have messaged the mods on this issue and will report back to you once I get a reply. EDIT: Here is the reply I got So it seems this is not censorship, just removal of obvious spam. There's a difference. If you look anywhere else, you'll see that dissenting opinions are no…
/r/MensRights11/11/14 09:24 PM
0

Please understand that what we are against is the fact that the child does not have a choice in the matter. If circumcised people are happy with it, that's fine.
/r/MensRights11/11/14 08:10 PM
3

[citation needed]
/r/MensRights11/11/14 08:00 PM
4

Wow, that image is all kinds of infuriating. They openly make attacks against us while claiming that we do things we have actively tried to avoid. Correct me if I'm wrong, but I'm pretty sure the mods here made a point to only remove troll and other rule-breaking posts so as to promote free speech.
/r/MensRights11/11/14 07:44 PM
1

[citation needed] that's how I would reply.
/r/MensRights11/11/14 02:44 PM
1

Thank you, this is very helpful.
/r/MensRights10/11/14 11:23 PM
4

/r/mractivism Edit: I'm not saying this disproves your argument that we don't get much done. It's true, we have had made very little actual progress. I'm posting this link to try and encourage other people seeing this to try and engage more in some actual activism.
/r/MensRights08/11/14 07:09 PM
8

Because very often, problems brought up on this sub are caused by feminism. In my opinion we don't necessarily want to decry feminism as a whole, just point out that some of the things it stands for represent misandry.
/r/MensRights08/11/14 06:47 PM
1

Came here to say this. The logic here is just astounding.
/r/MensRights07/11/14 07:09 AM
-1

Meme that needs to be launched I don't think that word means what you think it means. Aside from that, making an image to share and raise awareness on this would be a great idea. Anyone here with digital art skills?
/r/MensRights05/11/14 10:13 PM
3

Uh, yes they do...
/r/MensRights05/11/14 10:11 PM
1

Women get paid less because, on average, they work less. There are a number of reasons for this, some of which I think feminists should be against (I.e. women working shorter hours because they know they can just depend on husbands) but it is not caused by discrimination.
/r/MensRights02/11/14 01:03 PM
7

That's true, typically men don't need to be as scared as women about violence because they're more likely to be able to defend themselves. The reason we don't like this suggestion of 'one strike and you're out' is that if a man hits a woman in self defense, she can just say he hit first and suddenly he's a felon. Also, once the attacker has any form of weapon or coercion tool (such as the scenario above) physical strength is no longer needed.
/r/MensRights29/10/14 04:23 PM
4

Fun fact: 80% of statistics are made up on the spot.
/r/MensRights28/10/14 09:31 PM
0

It potentially blocks real rape reports from being seen.
/r/MensRights27/10/14 11:09 PM
0

I'm not complaining, I just think they didn't need more than one fake post, and an email explaining what they thought was wrong about the site directly to the owners would have been more effective.
/r/MensRights27/10/14 08:39 PM
1

Not sure about the website, but it got reported on various news sites and got shared all over the place as "evidence of how mra's are hateful".
/r/MensRights27/10/14 08:37 PM
1

The main one I know of is the group that spammed a rape reporting site to show it was flawed (they made a good point, but not the right way to do it). There's a lot more, but those are (mostly) only in reaction to equally hateful radfems.
/r/MensRights27/10/14 05:21 PM
4

My logic on this is that everyone should be treated as equals unless conclusively proven otherwise.
/r/MensRights25/10/14 05:42 PM
5

Unfortunately, it's necessary. If we didn't have this rule, AMR and others would pick up these links and use it as 'evidence of brigading' to try and get this sub banned.
/r/MensRights24/10/14 05:16 PM
2

Huh, I didn't know that. thanks for the explanation!
/r/MensRights24/10/14 04:43 PM
1

I understand mgm has risks, and that's one reason why it should not be allowed. I said it wasn't as bad as fgm because it does not (purposefully) remove sexual function, whereas fgm is intended to cause pain and disability.
/r/MensRights24/10/14 02:52 PM
-4

I very much agree with you. Although mgm is nowhere near as bad as fgm, it is still genital mutilation and should be regarded as such.
/r/MensRights24/10/14 06:56 AM
1

The idea that men are more than walking ATM's that want nothing but sex? Forgive me if I'm wring but it seems that's a very common trope in chick flicks.
/r/MensRights23/10/14 10:03 PM
1

Unfortunately true.
/r/MensRights21/10/14 06:24 AM
2

I see how my above post could be interpreted as that, but it's not what I meant. To clarify, I mean we should discuss men's issues and feminists should discuss women's issues, but we should work together as one when petitioning or in other forms of activism for equality.
/r/MensRights20/10/14 06:33 PM
9

The way I see it, men'srights is a sector of the equal rights movement as a whole. We campaign for men's rights, feminists campaign for women's rights, etc. And together we all campaign for equality. Or, that's how it should be. Unfortunately, it's difficult to balance helping people and disadvantaging others. "Your rights end where mine begin" is something I see a lot. Because of this, there is often a hostility between the two sides which prevents the formation of an all-equality movement.
/r/MensRights20/10/14 05:35 PM
1

There were no personal attacks in their post. Please don't assume people are angry on the internet because they're arguing with you.
/r/MensRights20/10/14 06:12 AM
1

Huh, I hadn't heard about that and I don't approve of that idea either. Do you have a link to this?
/r/MensRights12/10/14 09:10 AM
8

It's kinda sad that you have to point out this is said by a woman. Because women's opinions are automatically more important.
/r/MensRights11/10/14 11:26 PM
5

I think you misunderstand our stance on rape reporting. We don't want to discourage real rape victims from coming forward, but at the moment (in colleges especially) the accused is not given the due process rights they deserve. It's not hurting the victim to assume the accused is innocent until proven guilty, if the rape is genuine they will get what they deserve. It just takes a little longer.
/r/MensRights11/10/14 11:11 PM
1

Marriage is a great idea. It's the laws about it that need to change.
/r/MensRights11/10/14 02:16 PM
8

Quick reverse: "Here’s what we do want to kill: the concept of femininity. And you should want that, too."
/r/MensRights11/10/14 09:01 AM
0

I see a lot of people say there is already a lot of pressure for rape victims not to report it. Would you say this is true?
/r/MensRights11/10/14 08:58 AM
1

You don't have to be oppressive to be sexist.
/r/MensRights10/10/14 06:45 AM
1

I don't see anything wrong with this. The problem is when the state makes it sexual assault even if she is sober and gives consent.
/r/MensRights08/10/14 05:26 PM
7

This is something I've been thinking about recently. If roughly 200,000 cases of rape are reported each year in the us, that means between 4,000 (2%) and 16,000 (8%) people will be falsely accused of rape each year. I'd say that's enough to necessitate due process, wouldn't you?
/r/MensRights07/10/14 10:29 PM
10

Even if that isn't happening (there's no way to tell), it is important that we upvote the more important posts whenever possible to show that our main agenda isn't hate.
/r/MensRights07/10/14 07:00 AM
1

Brand new account with no other posts. I think you might be the troll here.
/r/MensRights05/10/14 08:13 AM
19

Reminds me of this.
/r/MensRights04/10/14 11:54 AM
2

I don't think so. The only gender-based network here is based around women in leadership positions, which is statistically lower than men, so it makes sense to have that one. It would be nice to have one for men, though.
/r/MensRights30/09/14 01:45 PM
5

Great, now I both love and hate that party.
/r/MensRights29/09/14 04:16 PM
2

What a dick he is.
/r/MensRights25/09/14 04:00 PM
2

girls would have a lot less problems if they would loosen up and maybe crack a smile now and then A lot of girls don't have this problem because they aren't like that, you shouldn't generalize about an entire gender. I agree though, that girl in particular needs to loosen up. I'm not saying you're entirely wrong, it seems in some ways that women are taught to be offended by things like this. But that isn't really related to this sub and generalising about women is no better than saying "all men …
/r/MensRights25/09/14 03:46 PM
2

Relevant XKCD
/r/MensRights24/09/14 10:04 PM
17

"Still working to oppress you". Sure, because disagreeing that feminism is where I should focus my help is 'oppression'.
/r/MensRights23/09/14 10:57 PM
5

On this issue I think cat calling can be seen as a form of abuse. Imo, at least in a lot of cases people do it not to compliment someone but just to be a dick.
/r/MensRights23/09/14 06:10 PM
29

"There’s really no such thing as a chick forcing sex on a dude in general, let alone if you’re 60 years old and dying." This. This has to stop.
/r/MensRights19/09/14 06:39 AM
2

Great to see some actual change being made, I'd like to see more things like this in the future.
/r/MensRights18/09/14 05:00 PM
3

That's a good point. Maybe I should have said "people are easily offended" instead.
/r/MensRights15/09/14 05:39 AM
10

In my opinion, mensrights and feminism are constantly at war with each other because feminists are so easily offended. To even question the idea that what they preach isn't entirely true (I.e. the 77% wage gap, patriarchy, only men commit rape, etc) is seen as a personal attack against them which causes an emotional response. And of course, feels > reals.
/r/MensRights14/09/14 05:10 PM
2

when women call you nice they are manipulating you. Although I agree this is a tactic people use, you can't say that every woman who calls a man nice plans to use them. If you assume all women are evil and manipulative that's just sexism and just as bad as saying all men are aggressive and violent.
/r/MensRights14/09/14 06:54 AM
5

By the dictionary definition, yes. By what feminists have been doing in recent years? No way.
/r/MensRights10/09/14 04:23 PM
1

How is this related to MRA?
/r/MensRights05/09/14 03:51 PM
7

She stuck her fingers in his mouth and touched his nipples.
/r/MensRights02/09/14 01:20 PM
3

No no, we can't have this here, it's a joke about sex! That contributes to rape culture! /s
/r/MensRights01/09/14 10:57 AM
5

I'm interested, is there any source for your claim that 85% of rape claims are false? I'm not saying I don't believe you, but it would help a lot in debates to be able to back it up.
/r/MensRights30/08/14 11:42 PM
3

Feminism is what its supporters want it to be. Hopefully more feminists like this will change the anti-male stance we see from the movement as a whole.
/r/MensRights28/08/14 09:19 AM
2

/s, right?
/r/MensRights28/08/14 09:16 AM
3

This does not belong here.
/r/MensRights27/08/14 08:11 PM
5

Or, more importantly, teach them not to demand crippling amounts of money from said divorce.
/r/MensRights27/08/14 04:11 PM
1

This is why they shouldn't have removed the up/down voting info. Proportional representation is important.
/r/MensRights25/08/14 03:44 PM
3

This is shocking, but can we please focus on mensrights issues? It seems a lot of posts here have just been anti-feminism and that isn't good for our image, no matter how true it is.
/r/MensRights20/08/14 08:25 PM
3

Only feminists could put a negative spin on getting free money and custody of their children.
/r/MensRights02/07/14 10:27 AM
1

My common sense is tingling!
/r/MensRights23/06/14 09:30 PM
4

For anyone interested, the company is 3Drobotics. The specific quadcopter he was flying is called the Iris.
/r/PussyPass21/06/14 10:35 AM
3

"Not routinely the least bit scared of us" Just that picture scares me, let alone the idea that she could hit me and get away with it.
/r/MensRights18/05/14 02:09 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter