TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

reverbiscrap Archive

View 2 posts and 4,094 comments by reverbiscrap on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
73

Edu./Occu.reverbiscrap/r/MensRights13/07/23 05:53 AM
55

Generalreverbiscrap/r/MensRights27/01/23 01:18 PM
Showing the 1,000 most recent of 4,094 comments.
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Adultification of boys can be a lethal affair. Tamir Rice was shot dead in seconds by police who thought the 12yo boy was 19yo. I remember clearly the age where people started treating me differently; it was age 9, in elementary school.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/02/25 07:59 AM
1

Your post got auto scrubbed. Try again, without profanities.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/02/25 07:16 AM
3

They aren't. Edit: most of their posts involve carrying water for feminism and trolling conservative subreddits.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/02/25 07:14 AM
3

No, feminism is both explicitly capitalist/Neo-Liberal and elitist.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/02/25 07:00 AM
1

They don't need to when they can convince a man to do it for them. My father has stories about guys he knew who were convinced to sell crack during the 80s by their wives and gfs, and I've heard other older men say the same. I low-key think he was talking about my mom lol.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/02/25 04:19 AM
1

How common in social media has been what you brought up? Edit: you post on trollx, nevermind
/r/EverydayMisandry11/02/25 06:31 PM
3

Earnings gap, actually. Men work more 'work hours' than women. The 'Pay Gap' is actually split along racial lines, not sex lines, but you can't tell white women that.
/r/MensRights11/02/25 05:39 AM
1

Your lack of context is showing. You are single with no children, aren't you?
/r/MensRights11/02/25 05:35 AM
1

Society has had bad things to say about 'deadbeat dads' since the 1930s. Suspiciously quiet about women being reckless with their wombs in an age where women have not only the law on their side, but the most medical agency in the history of humanity. You are attempting to deflect accountability from the group that has the legal power to make l choices of their own accord. Fortunately, there is writing on this! Start with 'Promises I Can Keep'.
/r/MensRights11/02/25 05:31 AM
3

And how does this person speak for others?
/r/MensRights11/02/25 05:20 AM
5

that has nothing to do with women being utterly incapable of producing labor. You are right! It is because the women choose not to, and that wasn't thought of by the social engineers who pushed women en masse in to the male work space. They assumed 'you just need to teach them to do it', assumed nurture and ignored nature, and here we are. There is a reason women take $150,000 more out of society in govt resources than they put in, and men put in $150,000+ more in to society than they consume. T…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/02/25 03:16 PM
1

That is feminist epistemology that asserts the ontological 'Goodness' or 'High Morality' of women, which a cursory look at the real world will show you is not true (unless you believe in Patriarchy Theory, coincidentally). We have actual recorded history, recent history, of successful matriarchies. Judaism, and its associated culture, is matriarchal in nature. The Iroquois nation, and in fact many Native American cultures, were matriarchal. What trips people up is that they think that a matriarc…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/02/25 03:01 PM
1

Can't tell them that. They heard it was the 'minorities' that were getting free money for decades, and I dont think the truth will be let go of for quite a while.
/r/MensRights10/02/25 12:07 PM
16

What I figured. These are Philly fans. People who climb greased up street light poles when their sports team win. People who had a jail in their old stadium.
/r/EverydayMisandry10/02/25 12:05 PM
1

Your words do have a lot of merit; we are indeed more than the data alone. What I muse about is the why. I have some international experience, and I can tell you, in some cultures, the idea of a woman striking a man is a fairly poor road to go down, due to the sex roles according to the Divine Masculine and Feminine being adhered to. Act according to those roles, and you are responded to in kind. Aggression, both given and received, is under the Divine Masculine.
/r/EverydayMisandry10/02/25 11:31 AM
1

Google 'Son Husband'. Its putting the emotional, physical, and sometimes sexual (although people try to pretend it doesn't happen) responsibilities of a husband on to their son. I've seen in a lot in my community, such that a scholar, Dr. T. Hasan Johnson coined a term for it.
/r/EverydayMisandry10/02/25 07:06 AM
1

t's misogynistic to imply women are more violent a To rebut, the IPV data, which would be apropos to this conversation, absolutely shows that women are more likely to engage in, and escalate, abuse within the family. You could say that it is unfortunate, perhaps even gauche, but OP is, at least on a particular level, correct. What needs to come next is studies about why women engage in IPV at the rates they do.
/r/EverydayMisandry10/02/25 06:59 AM
1

Which one is yours?
/r/EverydayMisandry10/02/25 06:55 AM
6

For a lot of people, there are no 'bisexual' men or experimenting. You are gay or straight.
/r/EverydayMisandry10/02/25 06:52 AM
2

I've heard this irl since I was young, and I'm north of 40. This is how a lot of people actually think.
/r/EverydayMisandry10/02/25 06:50 AM
1

roughly 'Patriarchy' is a cultural method of family delineation first and foremost. In a Patriarchy, the father is the primary owner/keeper of the children born to his family. This is usually extracted up, with such men being given leadership roles in family clans and tribes, going up to leadership of communities of networked families. 'Matriarchy' works in the same fashion, with mothers being the primary owner of the children in a family. 'Patriarchy Theory' is a feminist philosophical social f…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/02/25 06:36 AM
1

I wouldn't go that far This is in the historical record; it is entirely factual. Dr. Tommie Curry in his book 'The Man-Not' specifically references the people involved and their motivations from their own mouths. In fact, what I referenced was an interview from the passing of Title VII you used to be able to find on YouTube. Yet only white men get blamed. Take that up with white women.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/02/25 06:23 AM
1

When speaking of actually implementing the practice the way Marx ultimately intended? Yes. Marx was theorizing solutions, not merely ideas.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/02/25 06:19 AM
11

They believe women are ontologically 'Good', so the idea of wrong doing is essentially foreign.
/r/EverydayMisandry09/02/25 08:56 AM
1

White women are "oppressed" because white and black feminists teamed up with racist Dixiecrats because they didn't want the n-words to have access to jobs and status white women didn't have A white female senator involved in it all had an interview in 1974 where she said this almost verbatim. This had everything to do with white women's jealousy, and the white men who assisted them in order to screw over the blacks.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/02/25 08:02 AM
1

... so Roman and Hittite social and cultural norms, over 3000 years old, are based on a theory from the 19th century? Chinese social norms that have been continuous for 2800 years is based on feminist Patriarchy Theory? A lot of people need to read a goddamn book.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/02/25 07:57 AM
1

It was supposed to benefit black men, per the Kerner Commission, which when investigating why the African American community was in such dire straits and about to implode, found it the answer was... Racism, from top to bottom, almost exclusively. White feminists teamed up with black feminists and racist Dixiecrats to put 'women' in to Title VII, and that is why White Women have been the biggest beneficiary of it all. The whole 'white men suck' and 'n-words taking our jobs' was a psy-op done to w…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/02/25 07:54 AM
1

I have a feeling its an alt account.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/02/25 07:50 AM
19

It is more in line with what OP wants, so I want to speed them on their way.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/02/25 07:47 AM
33

Op should leave this sub and go to r/menslib, which aligns entirely with what they think.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/02/25 05:42 AM
4

You are referring more to Neo-Liberalism, not capitalism, as a concept. Neo-Liberalism advocates for no constraints on the market, capitalism has weak opinions on regulation, as that is a matter of govt policy, not the market.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/02/25 05:39 AM
5

Your issue seems to be with the idea of structure itself, and your desire of, or fascination with, negative liberty.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/02/25 05:37 AM
31

Your criticism is founded on feminist philosophy and epistemology. You either are a troll, or have drunk the kool-aid so deeply you can not see your own biases. You sound like menslib would be a better place for you. The male advocacy promoted here does not view 'feminism' the ideology as sacrosanct, and your embarrassing lack of knowledge about feminism itself, seen in the posts made here, make it almost impossible to debate you. Read Dr Tommie Curry's book 'The Man-Not', and you will have a ba…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/02/25 05:34 AM
10

Marx himself said that Socialism as he wrote it was a conceptual idea that had never been achieved by humanity. And I really doubt Marx would have been able to predict the coming of Techno-Feudalism lol.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/02/25 05:23 AM
-2

'Patriarchy' is a real thing, with a definition and conditions to exist. 'Patriarchy Theory' is feminist tripe that has no actual meaning and serves as a cudgel, scalpel and shield.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/02/25 02:27 AM
9

The issue with DEI, and Affirmative Action before it, is that the vast majority of the benefits went to white women, when the program was initially created to bring black men in to jobs they were being gatekept from. In fact, black people are at the bottom of the list of 8 groups that benefitted from DEI initiatives.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/02/25 02:26 AM
20

I think what OP is referring to is the 'Social Contract', the exchange between men and women within a society. That said, no one under age 50 living in a western nation has really seen the Social Contract actually working, because feminism explicitly, purposefully disrupted half of it. So now you have the curious phenomenon of women not being bound to traditional roles, and men being forced to because society's actual survival depends on the aculturated suicidal labors men perform. This is why y…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/02/25 01:46 AM
2

A lot of opinions and rhetoric make a helluva lot of sense when you examine them from that lens.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/02/25 05:21 AM
3

What OP has missed is MONEY. Women spend millions (maybe billions now) on books, and social media trends have been encouraging women to buy books by female authors. Follow the money; simple greed and the capitalist market working as intended are much more believable than some Mwa-ha-ha in a closet working levers to society.
/r/MensRights07/02/25 05:05 AM
7

Empathy is taught, it is not an inherent trait. What OP is recognizing is that people are not taught to empathize with men in current western society, and perhaps over empathize with women, leading to some very strange interactions right out of 'Men are from Mars, Women are from Venus'.
/r/MensRights07/02/25 04:59 AM
7

DEI hasn't been helping women of color or any other marginalized group like it should be. It wasn't supposed to help them, it was intended to help black men, as per the Kerner Commission. Feminists got upset that the Negroes were getting offers white women were not, so teamed up with people like Pauli Murray (I am usually not so kind to her, but I will respect the sub in this regard) and racist Dixiecrats to add 'Women' to the list of oppressed groups under Title VII. This opened the door for wh…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/02/25 08:41 AM
9

Its because the primary objection to 'DEI' is the idea that black people, Black men in particular, are getting something they are not. Of course the lazy n-words aren't supposed to get something for free that I worked hard for! Then you find out that white women have always been the biggest group to benefit from it, which black men at the bottom of a list of 7-8 groups, and you discover you have been getting played for 40 years by... who, in fact?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/02/25 08:17 AM
2

Depends on where and when. Online, I move on. Irl, I note and move on.
/r/EverydayMisandry06/02/25 08:11 AM
7

I have not heard many men on social media over the last 20 years call their exes narcissists, much less abusive. In fact, it wasn't until the 2010s that the idea began to find acceptance that women could abuse men, in all the same ways men are purported to abuse women. Thank you, Duluth Model!
/r/EverydayMisandry06/02/25 06:45 AM
2

This act is unironically super patriarchal, because one of the primary goals of Patriarchy is protecting women from undesirables, including lower class men.
/r/EverydayMisandry05/02/25 09:56 AM
16

Mens physical sanctity is not to be respected anywhere, really.
/r/EverydayMisandry05/02/25 09:54 AM
2

Until they engaged in racist rhetoric and created some of the most enduring stereotypes about black men (the monstrous rapist for example) as part of their argument that white women should be able to vote instead of black men. Or how feminists hijacked the Civil Rights Movement (Pauli Murray and Gloria Steinem) and took the majority of the benefits of Affirmative Action, which was meant to support black veterans, and placed them in white women (which is where the racial income gap comes from and…
/r/MensRights05/02/25 07:02 AM
1

Says the basic ytch misandrist 🤣 trolling for screencaps again?
/r/MensRights05/02/25 06:52 AM
1

The book 'Beyond Title IX' and various studies have shown that current school methods disadvantage boys, and this arguing is serving as a smokescreen for your own lack of learning. You are parroting feminist philosophy that hasn't panned out in the real world, which boils down to 'girls are smarter than boys, thats why the girls are doing better in school, so nyeh'. It's tiring having to advocate for my sons in the face of people like you.
/r/MensRights05/02/25 06:43 AM
1

You mean feminist ideology, after feminists captured the educational system with the goal of 're-education' (reference the book 'Beyond Title IX', as it states this in plain print) after successfully appropriating the Civil Rights Movement due to people like Gloria Steinem and Pauli Murray, all for the benefit of elite/upper class white women. I hear this 'far left' assertion a lot, and that tells me who you listen to, because the actual history doesn't support this, all the way back to the Decl…
/r/MensRights05/02/25 06:35 AM
2

Add to this list 'Beyond Title IX'.
/r/MensRights05/02/25 06:25 AM
1

Not on this sub, which is noticeably less harsh than many others I can think of. I reckon it is more likely friends (or alt accounts) of the user that followed you here to begin with.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/02/25 06:23 AM
1

I mean I doubt people on this sub are downvoting you. Serves no purpose.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/02/25 04:45 AM
7

I smell projection.
/r/EverydayMisandry05/02/25 03:57 AM
6

For the same reason white women are the majority recipients of Affirmative Action benefits and DEI initiatives.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/02/25 03:54 AM
2

You are assuming its people on this sub?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/02/25 03:53 AM
1

I'm happy for you, OP, I really am ✊🏿
/r/MenSupportMen04/02/25 01:34 PM
2

If you meant 'opposite', I'd have to push back gently, as Dworkin is required reading in any gender studies course you care to name, and not as an example to be avoided.
/r/MensRights04/02/25 01:28 PM
8

feminists have said things like “are the straights ok?” The one you are talking about in particular who coined that just did a hit piece about femininity influencers.
/r/MensRights04/02/25 01:26 PM
11

he math doesn’t math that way when considering length of encounter (men are around women all the time and around sharks minimal time) or proportion (% of swimming population murdered vs percent of men murdered) Tell this to feminists, they do not care.
/r/MensRights04/02/25 01:25 PM
1

And the idiot feminists will show up to finger wag, blame men and say 'this is how patriarchy hurts men too!' rather than recognize an obvious class issue that is supported and rewarded by women.
/r/MensRights04/02/25 08:29 AM
2

She's not even right here, because any cause women have taken up didn't get off the ground unless men took part in it, and men always do. See Iran, and the 700 men killed or imprisoned protesting for women's rights.
/r/EverydayMisandry04/02/25 05:58 AM
2

I've heard that said unironically already.
/r/EverydayMisandry04/02/25 05:56 AM
8

Hyper-agentic and hypo-agentic; the old American trope that came about post 1865 was that (white) women were dainty things that needed protection from the world. Feminists cultivated this in to a shield against accountability and consequences.
/r/EverydayMisandry04/02/25 05:52 AM
5

Depending on the sub, the downvotes would not be there.
/r/EverydayMisandry04/02/25 05:50 AM
6

Your wife is a bigot, sorry, man. You are seeing the end stage of what feminism actually is, because what your wife is saying is expressly the sentiment of most feminist philosophy and writings. The leopard is about to eat your face.
/r/EverydayMisandry04/02/25 05:48 AM
12

My standing issue with this statement is how myopic and misanthropic it actually is. It is rooted in dehumanization and childish, asshole snark.
/r/EverydayMisandry01/02/25 09:18 AM
3

Yes, but its not to control Caucasian populations; it was created to bring down the number of Africans, and the plan's creators are closet eugenicists.
/r/MensRights01/02/25 08:43 AM
3

I'll ignore them. Programs like Affirmative Action and 'DEI' were supposed to help black men first. Instead, we were dead last. Thanks for nothing, there are no tears that will be shed by this sector. Take this discussion to white women, who were the actual benefactors and have the most to say about it.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/02/25 07:01 AM
9

So... femcels?
/r/EverydayMisandry01/02/25 06:29 AM
5

I treat women with the same caution and reserve that I treat men. Just because a woman may not be able to best me in unarmed combat does not make her less a threat due to the availability of firearms (I've been drawn on several times) or the ability to summon the aid of bystanders and/or state actors (screaming 'HELP!' while running down the street). What I do not do is package that caution with dehumanization or objectification. Women are people, just like me, and deserve the same dignity and r…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/01/25 01:34 PM
6

Sigh.
/r/EverydayMisandry29/01/25 03:04 PM
1

I firmly believe that women tend to feel more often, but less strongly, men feel less often, but more powerfully. If you have seen it, a man consumed by his 'Passion' is a terrible thing: terribly wonderful, or terribly awful.
/r/MenSupportMen29/01/25 08:09 AM
1

Did you have other older men around you that you could talk to about your troubles, or were you atomized/disconnected from a wider group?
/r/MenSupportMen29/01/25 08:06 AM
2

It's less about 'deserve', and more about 'honesty'. If you can not agree to a level of honesty and transparency in the relationship, what is it then?
/r/MenSupportMen29/01/25 06:57 AM
6

You are supposed to talk about her feelings the way she wants, not in a way that helps you or the relationship.
/r/MenSupportMen28/01/25 11:42 AM
3

I've never seen anyone say kill all dogs online and get away with it.
/r/MensRights28/01/25 11:17 AM
0

The inability translate feelings in to words is the biggest sign of emotional immaturity. Jungian psych calls having an undeveloped anima/animus. It is incredibly taxing to integrate with in an interpersonal relationship.
/r/MenSupportMen28/01/25 11:00 AM
8

No, because TERFs only have a problem with transwomen, not transmen. It isn't coming from a position of honesty, but an attempt to gatekeep privilege.
/r/EverydayMisandry28/01/25 10:57 AM
5

That demographic tends to be non hetero feminists In my experience and reading, it is the 'queer' feminists, like Pauli Murray, that gas up hetero women in to fear/anxiety loops about men, and then those women spread it to other women via trauma bonding and teaching it to their children. It really is a mind virus lol.
/r/EverydayMisandry28/01/25 05:27 AM
18

I treat women with a high degree of caution and reserve because while they, individually, may not be an unarmed threat to me, I've had women draw on me before, and the state jackboots are a phone call away. The difference is that reservation and caution is not packaged with dehumanization or objectification. They are still a person, just like me, who deserves a baseline of respect and dignity. I do not think the women who claim to have to 'fear' men or 'put armor on to protect themselves' offer …
/r/EverydayMisandry27/01/25 04:28 PM
1

It's one of the curiosities of American law It's the Tender Years Doctrine of the 70s, itself mirroring the British Common Law 'Women and Infants Act' of 1839 (iirc). Where it stems from.
/r/MensRights27/01/25 07:31 AM
14

That is the actual meaning of the phrase.
/r/MensRights26/01/25 08:51 AM
3

Welcome to the bullshit.
/r/MenSupportMen26/01/25 01:15 AM
8

Welcome to it, man.
/r/MenSupportMen25/01/25 05:08 PM
1

If a dude snatched a baby and put it in one of those 'anonymous' baby drop off boxes, I guarantee his ass will be found by the next day 🤣 they'd find him faster than they found Luigi.
/r/MensRights25/01/25 07:55 AM
1

I read fathers can leave the kid there too I've never heard of such a thing, but safe haven laws have a time limit.
/r/MensRights25/01/25 06:05 AM
2

Both in the US and the UK, as they have similar family court law.
/r/MensRights25/01/25 05:56 AM
6

Men have always supported other men. Its only recently that men have been increasingly atomized, along with the destruction of communal male spaces.
/r/MensRights25/01/25 05:46 AM
2

The entirety of Judaism. Also, Patriarchy Theory!= actual Patriarchy/Matriarchy.
/r/EverydayMisandry25/01/25 05:17 AM
49

It is not my duty to make myself small to ease the petty bigotry of others.
/r/EverydayMisandry25/01/25 05:13 AM
3

You sounding real 'sassy' right now 🙄 hate that shit.
/r/EverydayMisandry24/01/25 07:50 AM
50

Using misandrist language.
/r/EverydayMisandry24/01/25 05:40 AM
1

Mandatory conscription is more about have a trained populace than a military force. I do not particularly disagree with it, and further, I think a 2 year exercise in civil service (not simply military) would help a lot of young men, and especially young women.
/r/EverydayMisandry24/01/25 05:07 AM
3

handily ignores Proxy Violence ignores actual existing matriarchies and how they all still use men for purposes of violence directed by women I can smell the white woman typing. Or Indian woman, starting to smell similar.
/r/EverydayMisandry24/01/25 05:01 AM
2

This is about gatekeeping power.
/r/EverydayMisandry24/01/25 04:54 AM
3

Op should send this screencap as well as a host of others to news organizations under 'Reddit Promotes Hate Speech'.
/r/EverydayMisandry22/01/25 10:40 AM
1

Myth of White Womanhood reigns.
/r/EverydayMisandry22/01/25 10:37 AM
10

What I have discovered is that on social media, men's lived experiences are not valid, and to a lesser extent, neither are boys. Social media reflects the public mood that isn't stated aloud.
/r/EverydayMisandry22/01/25 10:36 AM
2

Your argument isn't 'ethical', it's emotional; textbook feminist theory, based on ignorance, that doesn't have an evidence, empirical or otherwise, to support it. If you really think what you are saying has merit, point to something concrete to support it. Show me a study that proves, without a doubt, that the 'Mann/Man' language objectively harms, and survived peer review.
/r/MensRights21/01/25 01:13 PM
1

I firmly believe, from what different mods are not saying, that Reddit will drop the hammer on you for gatekeeping women in particular out, compared to subs who actively gatekeep men out.
/r/EverydayMisandry21/01/25 06:04 AM
2

Your position is foolish and based on very temporal concerns. It lacks linguistic merit. If you actually believe all of the things you have said, get a PhD in English, and start the change in academia; you will fail, just like other PhD's in English have failed. You are calling for a radical rewriting of English language that you can not argue from a language framing, but from a emotional appeal.
/r/MensRights21/01/25 02:35 AM
14

It can. It does, factually and grammatically, because English does not have a neutral form in its language the way say, German does. You are complaining about the English language as it is. It has nothing to do with gender politics.
/r/MensRights20/01/25 09:27 PM
1

Bear Grylls' Survivor seasons 1 and 2.
/r/MensRights20/01/25 08:46 PM
2

It'll get scrubbed out of hand.
/r/EverydayMisandry20/01/25 08:02 PM
29

How does "man" include women Read about English language grammar.
/r/MensRights20/01/25 07:53 PM
10

Derrick Jaxn.
/r/EverydayMisandry20/01/25 06:34 PM
1

here is an aspirational white womanhood amongst black women The Myth of White Womanhood is too much for most to reckon with.
/r/MensRights19/01/25 01:52 AM
4

more accurately WHITE womanhood Because white women are the largest voting bloc, and nothing gets done unless white women want it. That's why we are still talking about fucking abortion.
/r/MensRights18/01/25 06:52 AM
1

You might have too much dog in this fight to be objective. However, if what you say is true, and you support her, I'd love to hear your opinions on a male focused policy agenda I had a hand in making. When the posters here talk about actual action, it will look like this. https://newblackmasculinities.wordpress.com/2020/09/24/the-black-male-political-agenda-by-t-hasan-johnson-ph-d/
/r/MensRights18/01/25 06:50 AM
10

It makes sense to you because it excuses your own bad behavior and justifies your inability to be a decent person. Sad.
/r/EverydayMisandry18/01/25 06:45 AM
3

This is a reference to Charles Manson, a serial killer that is (was?) a darling to a large number of women, as well as people like 'Prison Bae'. It shows that good looks can let you get away with actual murder in the literal sense.
/r/EverydayMisandry17/01/25 05:12 AM
1

He said he's coming back soon, looking forward to it.
/r/MensRights17/01/25 03:46 AM
1

What began as a calculated effort to alter dynamics within a specific community has produced widespread and unintended ramifications, reshaping cultural narratives and intergroup relations far beyond its initial scope. Clarke's 'Tangle of Pathology' gone super critical.
/r/MensRights17/01/25 01:56 AM
4

This is from a shit-posting/troll account And a lot of women will agree. I have been called homophobic slurs by women far more than by men, usually as a way to enact SIGN Language to bully or shame me for not doing as I was told.
/r/EverydayMisandry16/01/25 07:54 AM
6

Op, the phrase you are actually looking for is 'Patriarchy by Feminist specifications'. That said, the African American community is a functioning gynocracy; America as a whole is a state run matriarchy, and there is a difference.
/r/MensRights16/01/25 07:51 AM
11

The white girls are adopting sister girl talk when they dip in to their feminism bag; thats why listening to these liberal white feminists gives us brothers anaphylaxis. We heard the same shit from our mothers and the round the way girl.
/r/MensRights16/01/25 05:52 AM
4

Dr. Curry's book 'The Man-Not' talks about it, as well as being referenced in W.E.B. DuBois' book 'The Philadelphia Negro'. Dense reads, but incredibly enlightening.
/r/EverydayMisandry15/01/25 08:31 PM
16

So when this violent woman discover her violence is acceptable and applies that violence to children (because women are the overwhelming actors in child abuse of all stripes), can she blame society for not telling her its wrong? Or maybe if she beats her pets?
/r/EverydayMisandry15/01/25 10:07 AM
7

This may be a spicy take, but a guy I respect said this is the reason why VP Vance made his comment about 'cat ladies'. Not because there is anything intrinsically wrong with choosing that life, but because it is very often tied to anger, bitterness, and an almost feral misandry. The kind of women who will actively try to burn it all down to keep themselves warm, regardless of who they hurt, and the first people who would be hurt by that kind of selfish rage are people like his children; MY chil…
/r/EverydayMisandry14/01/25 04:29 PM
1

It's a religious interpretation; in Judeo-Christian faith, the woman is more valuable than the child, due to child mortality rates and women being able to make more children. In fact, human females have a startling capacity to murder their own babies, as well as that of others, if it comes to saving their own lives. Look up the rate of children that survived the Titanic, despite 'Women and children first!' being in full effect. The brutal difference is how many of the children made it on to life…
/r/EverydayMisandry14/01/25 05:17 AM
1

You didn't read the links, because the studies reference point out how feminism was worked in to policy to the detriment of (black) men and boys, such as the change to the educational curriculum in the 70s, the feminist capture of Affirmative Action, etc.
/r/MensRights14/01/25 05:12 AM
2

How dare you tell this queen she needs to accept a brokie or a dusty!... I can't even keep going 🤣🤣 /s for the people who didn't know.
/r/EverydayMisandry13/01/25 09:30 PM
2

<image>
/r/EverydayMisandry13/01/25 07:22 PM
1

There is a lot you don't seem to know about how Affirmative Action was waylaid by feminists, or how racism is part and parcel to feminism as a whole. https://youtube.com/shorts/rTIeuJGBowM?si=tEcnvNbVSXu9iOVs A short featuring Pauli Murray, who, along with SNICC, was essential to injecting feminism in to Civil Rights. https://youtu.be/fZg7r3cdGDY?si=5Hs9AOmKWzJ39qk1 A historical introspection on how far back the racist ideology in feminism goes (hint: 1840s). https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PL…
/r/MensRights13/01/25 10:33 AM
2

It's because men didn't want to. Absurdly reductionist, but what do you expect from trolls? men don't even like wearing condoms Covered this already, you decided to ignore it.
/r/MensRights13/01/25 09:42 AM
1

I remember that article, and likely will for a long time.
/r/EverydayMisandry12/01/25 06:47 AM
1

More than that, it was a black feminist talking about it. The hate they have for men is unreal.
/r/EverydayMisandry12/01/25 06:46 AM
1

I mentor black boys, I already knew this. Its an open secret in the black community about how often older women prey on teenage boys, and younger. Dr. Tommie Curry was the first academic I ever heard speak on this, and he was canceled for it. Canceled for speaking about the rape of boys. Imagine that.
/r/EverydayMisandry12/01/25 06:44 AM
5

colorism All the data we have shows that 'colorism' is passed down from mother to child, both explicitly and implicitly. She is telling on herself.
/r/EverydayMisandry12/01/25 06:40 AM
3

In my circles, we call this 'Mommying'; it is equal parts SIGN language and power play to tone police.
/r/EverydayMisandry12/01/25 06:30 AM
1

I see posts like this and chuckle, because the 'DEI hire' in reality rarely looks the way its assumed.
/r/EverydayMisandry12/01/25 06:27 AM
1

When I say 'contraceptives', I mean the kind analogous to what women have, that can not be tampered with or fished out of a garbage can, or can be 'forgotten' about because your rapist got your drunk before raping you.
/r/MensRights12/01/25 06:21 AM
1

The things that the CDC released a report in 2014 that said black men use more than any other group of men in the US. Before you ask: Blackdemographics.com
/r/MensRights12/01/25 06:14 AM
13

Hello, White and Asian women, how yall doing?
/r/EverydayMisandry11/01/25 05:50 AM
12

What annoys me more is that I've lost count of how many times I've seen people talk like that, hiding behind this "just venting" excuse I have some bigotries and prejudices that I carry, but I know exactly what they are, and I do not pretend they are anything other than something that reflects negatively on me, or act like they are alright to hold. To thyself be true, or else you are de-lu-lu.
/r/EverydayMisandry11/01/25 05:50 AM
5

So you agree with the policy activism of groups like N.O.W.? Of feminists like Steinbeck and Gearhart?
/r/MensRights11/01/25 05:46 AM
1

For all your words, the only thing you have offered are 'feeling' arguments that really boil down to dick measuring. It is more 'be quiet males' talk; shaming language that I expect from feminists and 'traditional males' to get men to stop talking. If you actually want to talk about boots on the ground advocacy, read this and tell me what you think can be added to it, a fairly complete male advocacy policy: https://newblackmasculinities.wordpress.com/2020/09/24/the-black-male-political-agenda-by…
/r/MensRights11/01/25 04:07 AM
7

This is the kind of gaslighting people need to beware, everyone. The first step to advocacy is communicating experiences, finding the through lines and realizing its not just you, and you aren't crazy. Being fed up with the status quo, even angry, creates the motivation to foment change.
/r/MensRights11/01/25 03:52 AM
3

You know that we know that is all nonsense, right? There were banks, owned by black women and catering to black women, in the 1920s.
/r/MensRights11/01/25 03:49 AM
6

How much have you looked in to the actual policies and actions of feminists?
/r/MensRights11/01/25 03:47 AM
14

Feminists stole Affirmative Action, which was created to get black men whole after Jim Crow, being denied the GI Bill, Homestead Act, etc, away from the people it was supposed to benefit from, because they were afraid the 'Negro Males' would have access that white women did not. Read the books 'White Women's Rights' and 'The Man-Not'.
/r/MensRights11/01/25 03:44 AM
6

A wiser man than I said the same thing about a surrogate. I did not follow that path, but I see no issue telling others that. Its good that men are getting wise to the game, and winning, in their own way.
/r/MensRights10/01/25 04:30 PM
5

That is why male contraceptives will never be. It represents power.
/r/MensRights10/01/25 04:21 PM
8

Of course not, its her baby that's the standard in matriarchies, btw
/r/MensRights10/01/25 04:16 PM
4

'Protect, provide, and shut up!' thank you, Mr. Z, for coming up with this catchphrase
/r/MensRights10/01/25 04:14 PM
2

Ooh, someone noticed it, too?
/r/EverydayMisandry10/01/25 03:57 PM
1

Top model, and had the attention of the most powerful man in the world? Don't think about it too much 🤣🐍🐍🐍
/r/EverydayMisandry10/01/25 03:57 PM
0

I reckon its the absurdity. That is something you wouldn't really see in Japanese society; it is very patriarchal, in that men have a place of honor in its social norms that would baffle most westerners.
/r/EverydayMisandry10/01/25 03:55 PM
3

Take it back from the misandrists.
/r/EverydayMisandry10/01/25 02:09 PM
5

Feminism was created by, and for the benefit of, elite white women; any benefit for anyone else is a fringe thing. Feminism was created to empower the types like Nancy Pelosi, not Rosa Parks, especially considering Feminism has a rich history of naked racism, classism, and eugenics. I think you actually need to read more about Feminism, because your understanding is incredibly pop culture. Start with the book 'White Women's Rights' and then 'The Man-Not'.
/r/MensRights10/01/25 07:14 AM
9

'Men in general' have never been in power; you are tripping on Apex Fallacy like a radfem 🤣
/r/MensRights10/01/25 07:11 AM
5

who set that system up?’ The top 3% of men and women. Next question? hate this monstrously ignorant, reductive 'question', it immediately shows you have no critical thinking skills
/r/MensRights10/01/25 07:10 AM
10

I recall someone saying that the only political issues that are 'important' are the ones women support, which is why stuff like labor policy is basically dead in the water.
/r/MensRights08/01/25 02:02 PM
5

Shouldn't have to be that way, but it is.
/r/MensRights08/01/25 01:57 PM
10

I regard people as people, good and bad. Give respect to get respected.
/r/MensRights08/01/25 01:45 PM
1

My uncle, an old school mack, told ms this: 'These women that fuck these kids are going after the fantasy of the cute boy they knew in school that they couldn't get. For them, its a second chance to prove they are the hot chick. Don't matter if its wrong, or its a kid. In fact, makes it better for them'.
/r/MensRights08/01/25 09:42 AM
64

One of the last things I would think is: “oh, women DO have feelings and dreams and hopes.” That's because you see women as human beings (despite what is told to you) and they... don't see you as essentially human.
/r/MensRights08/01/25 08:56 AM
1

As I had said, it works so long as innate preferences are respected and everyone is elevated. Feminism is, and was, an elite white woman's grift to get power and status to stand on the necks of their 'lessers', and earlier feminists said this in writing almost verbatim. Dr. Tommie Curry talks about it his book 'The Man-Not' how early feminists didn't try to bullshit and claim it was about 'equality'.
/r/MensRights08/01/25 06:50 AM
2

Pauli Murray is an absolute rabbit hole. The creator of 'Jane Crow' and one of the co-creators of both 2nd Wave Feminism and Intersectionality.
/r/EverydayMisandry08/01/25 06:45 AM
1

that's why these people didn't have their own land before the end of 1940s I point you to the Torah. so women are the head of the family there? Yes, they are. Home life is the center of the Jewish family, and women have the first and last word in it. A lot of people tend to not know a lot of things about Judaic culture, so whenever I bring this up, it surprises everyone because their idea of Patriarchy/Matriarchy is actually feminist Patriarchy Theory the philosophical ideology, not cultural or …
/r/MensRights07/01/25 07:33 PM
3

Judaism is actually a matriarchal religion by the definition of the term (ownership of the children is entirely in the hands of the women). The difference is that Judaism doesn't try to destroy their men, but instead elevates them to outwardly facing roles of power. In fact, every working matriarchy elevates and highly respects men, because those men are the force that preserves and advances communities.
/r/MensRights07/01/25 07:19 PM
2

when they can simply stick to dating other women who are more likely to be abusive than men 😅
/r/EverydayMisandry07/01/25 06:20 PM
1

You see it a lot in queer feminist writing. Who do you think came up with '4B Movement', and many other feminist ideology? Lesbian feminists, like Pauli Murray.
/r/EverydayMisandry07/01/25 06:12 PM
1

My rapist, when I was 5 yo, was a strange woman. Turns out she was a friend of my mother. Somehow, I avoided hating all women, or accusing all women of being pedophile rapists (even tho there are far more of those than people admit).
/r/EverydayMisandry07/01/25 06:09 PM
1

Except feminism as a concept predates Marx entirely. This argument doesn't hold water with a cursory knowledge of history, or a basic knowledge of philosophy, or knowledge of why feminism came about in the first place (an elite white woman grift to get hard power equal to elite white men by playing up female hypoagency).
/r/MensRights07/01/25 05:54 PM
13

Feel free to prove it. Link the post in question, as well as a picture of the poster.
/r/EverydayMisandry07/01/25 07:54 AM
21

This is what's happening to women I see someone who has not read Dr James Sidanious' studies about genocide and how it is fomented. Fortunately, you can read the book 'Social Dominance Theory' and learn!
/r/EverydayMisandry07/01/25 07:53 AM
0

You consider it immoral for men's spaces to be a thing? I think you are misunderstanding my assertion: I think dedicated men's spaces are vital. I do not think the kind of blanket segregation OP refers to is the most productive way to get them.
/r/MensRights06/01/25 07:06 PM
0

As I said, your comparison is not valid because we have historical evidence it does work, for the purpose it was supposed to serve, and the feminist version of the same always failed. You are comparing Icarus to the Wright Brothers in an argument against flying.
/r/MensRights06/01/25 03:36 PM
2

Started playing with his penis in front of me. Hoo boy, that brought the tiger dad out.
/r/EverydayMisandry05/01/25 05:36 PM
4

I hope you're doing okay and doing well. Well enough. More concerned with protecting my sons from what happened to me, and it is way more prevalent than I thought. I had to check my youngest's pediatrician. Almost put hands on her.
/r/EverydayMisandry05/01/25 10:43 AM
6

Idgaf about her, or anything about her, unless something about her contributed to a man's death.
/r/EverydayMisandry05/01/25 08:03 AM
10

To actually your comment, the CDC reports that for African American males, the average age of first sexual experience is age 12-14. For African American females, it is ages 17-18. Turn those numbers over for a minute. Don't even ask how old I was.
/r/EverydayMisandry05/01/25 07:54 AM
2

Op, if you must ask the question, its because you already know the answer. Get the kid swabbed on the low.
/r/MenSupportMen05/01/25 05:52 AM
3

I would agree, were there not a lengthy history of men's only spaces working fantastically well for those men, in multiple societies throughout history. I think this comparison to feminists, whose women only communes always failed due to infighting and incivility, isn't empirically supported. Moreso, I think it would be excellent for boys, given that I work with boys and young men, and see firsthand how the lack of guidance from male elders objectively harms them.
/r/MensRights05/01/25 05:13 AM
4

The feminists who you're hearing these extreme things from, are a minority. I would call groups like NOW, or feminists like Pauli Murray, Dworkin, Crenshaw a 'minority'.
/r/MensRights03/01/25 05:14 AM
11

the woman will move heaven and earth to gaslight you into believing it is your fault she screwed you over. Or claim righteousness for being a scummy person, rather than accept what they did was morally wrong.
/r/EverydayMisandry03/01/25 05:03 AM
10

There is a lot attached to this stereotype; Jung would have a field day.
/r/EverydayMisandry03/01/25 05:02 AM
2

I heard the book 'Beyond Title IX' goes in to the process, but I do not have it myself.
/r/MensRights01/01/25 01:13 AM
0

Oh, so Dr. Tommy Curry, who has said the exact same thing, Dr. Ronald Neal, Dr. T. Hasan Johnson, they don't know what they are talking about? You are fundamentally too uneducated even about culture to have this conversation with. I suggest you start with 'The Man-Not' and Dr. James Sidanious' 'Social Dominance Theory' before you attempt this conversation with anyone else.
/r/MensRights31/12/24 01:25 PM
0

You misunderstand white collar culture, and clearly haven't even read feminist literature about how status works in 'patriarchal societies'. I will at least explain one: white collar culture does not like unmarried men as leaders because they are considered 'dangerous' or 'reckless', loose cannons without the 'civilizing' effect of a wife and family. This is also a remnant of patriarchy, btw. Its not status the woman brings, it is a tether to leash him with.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/24 01:22 PM
9

Mens spaces being demonized out of hand for existing? Color me shocked! I wonder if any names were dropped?
/r/Male_Studies31/12/24 05:05 AM
5

It is because the study being referred to is a fairly well known one, and it is curious that despite being in these spaces, you do not know of it, or how 'Rape' statistics are lopsided due to wording of the law, even when it involves boys. It makes you seem one of the many... interlopers that stop by the sub for less than honest reasons. That said, I do have a link that mentions that topic, as well as the policy failure to address sexual assault of boys and men in general, along with links to th…
/r/EverydayMisandry31/12/24 04:42 AM
8

It's actually a position of power, because with these complaints, they exercise the traditional soft power women have in society to sway people. Topping from the bottom, as it were.
/r/EverydayMisandry31/12/24 04:37 AM
6

The primary factor involved with all of this is ENTITLEMENT. Entitled to your time, your money, your presence or lack thereof at their demand. Patriarchy by Feminist specifications, indeed.
/r/EverydayMisandry31/12/24 04:31 AM
1

Dr. T. Hasan Johnson recently tried to submit a paper about male coded emotional labor. It was rejected. A friend of his has a podcast has read it and said he will talk about the research at some point in the near future.
/r/MensRights30/12/24 12:12 PM
-1

men want to hypergamously trade for younger women? You are using hypergamy wrong; it refers to seeking higher status, and in most societies, women do not confer status to the man. bell hooks pointed this out in 'Aint I a Woman'. George and Martha Washington are excellent examples of this, as while Martha was one of the wealthiest individuals in the colonies of her time, George was considered one of the most eligible bachelors, such that Martha's family sought him out to arrange their marriage. A…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/24 12:07 PM
1

You need to Google definitions, because you are describing 'Patriarchy Theory', the feminist ideation, not Patriarchy the cultural mechanism. The reason I see this is because you did not mention children at any point, which is one of the primary focuses of patriarchy/matriarchy. That is why America, for example, is a state run matriarchy, as it gives primacy to the mother as steward of the children, and through them, both the family and community. You think too much in Intersectional Feminism; I…
/r/MensRights30/12/24 11:48 AM
2

how do you measure 'oppression' and who 'has it worse'? Read the Kerner Commission, because it was a study done by the US govt to figure out why black people in America had less wealth, poorer life outcomes, worse health conditions, et al than other Americans. Hint: it was entirely racism, and the report says so in that plain language.
/r/EverydayMisandry30/12/24 11:42 AM
15

Most of the boys and young men I know already are doing it, 'Going Monk'. I brought this up in a thread yesterday, and people were mad.
/r/MensRights30/12/24 08:02 AM
1

Boys in general are not taught that their bodies are inviolable the way girls are, so for men, it becomes a matter of measuring gains and losses, rather than a violation of their sanctity.
/r/EverydayMisandry30/12/24 05:37 AM
5

I see posts every so often on the various men focused subs saying something like 'I hate women', but I rarely see them stand long; the mods will delete them. Certainly not any topic title saying something like that.
/r/EverydayMisandry30/12/24 05:02 AM
1

Its a metastudy that had the numbers disaggregated down to the nuts and screws, something you rarely see.
/r/EverydayMisandry30/12/24 04:59 AM
5

Its paywalled so.us peons can't view it.
/r/MensRights29/12/24 06:39 AM
17

Sex balkanization seems a... one-sided affair.
/r/EverydayMisandry29/12/24 05:14 AM
2

So you have never heard of Dr. Tommy Curry, or Dr. T. Hasan Johnson? Or you never heard of Multi-dimensionality, which has replaced Intersectionality as a study because it failed to hold up? The only thing worse than a feminist is a feminist who can't read. Krenshaw herself spoke about this in the fucking early 00s. https://newblackmasculinities.wordpress.com/ Start reading Edit: are you ADOS/FBA?
/r/EverydayMisandry29/12/24 05:08 AM
7

Your desire to leverage your 'weakness' for power is blocking your capacity for empathy. The best part is that the men here are more apt to acknowledge the strength you have, without fear of seeming lesser for it, than you would admit your own strengths.
/r/MensRights29/12/24 04:21 AM
1

Except its not, not at all, because the point is to use men as mules, with women as the driver. I do not think you understand what patriarchy is, only Patriarchy Theory.
/r/MensRights29/12/24 01:59 AM
17

It is what I meant. Men The Group is the possessor of traits such as violent, rapacious, abusive, etc; in short, all of the Victorian Age ideas of masculinity made manifest. Women being brought in to this mindset quickly separate Men The Group from 'my father' because while good, he is not innocent. A son defines the innocence in the male body, and thus can be understood as a part of Men The Group.
/r/MensRights28/12/24 01:28 PM
3

https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/s/mAAVvv9bki https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/s/V8L8vToePx https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/s/LS1xX7Tp42 https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/s/021ybHhZoX https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/s/Wrds5Dg0DG Also, a bunch of policy changes and the studies to support them. https://newblackmasculinities.wordpress.com/2020/09/24/the-black-male-political-agenda-by-t-hasan-johnson-ph-d/
/r/MensRights28/12/24 12:12 PM
6

Lazy and stupid, wonderful combination
/r/MensRights28/12/24 12:06 PM
1

Already do, man, just listened to his 'Miseducation of Gen Z' video.
/r/MensRights28/12/24 11:57 AM
1

Catholic people who believe heavily in family values not have kids Bruh 🤣🤣
/r/MensRights28/12/24 11:55 AM
10

Except what you just said is not only Apex Fallacy, but using Apex Fallacy to justify abandoning the most vulnerable to their doom because someone somewhere wears a crown. It is inherently unjust, and every post you make just shows that you are really just an awful person in general. Elon Musk exists, so the millions of homeless men should be abandoned because... 'Patriarchy Theory', or some such?
/r/MensRights28/12/24 11:53 AM
8

Good, now please fuck off and don't come back.
/r/MensRights28/12/24 11:49 AM
1

The words you want are 'Progressive Traditionalism' or 'Patriarchy by Feminist Specifications'. Men fund, women run. Thanks, Mr. Z!
/r/MensRights28/12/24 11:48 AM
8

https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/s/TCy6R0T653 Here you are, now do your due diligence.
/r/MensRights28/12/24 11:43 AM
9

I just said where they are. The longitudinal study has been posted at least a dozen times in this sub. It is a 4 second search away, but you don't actually care, because you are a shitposter.
/r/MensRights28/12/24 11:40 AM
9

I'm so curious as to why I do not see it that way. Gamma bias and internalized victimhood narrative. If men can also be victims, women can not be the sole victim of society that needs protecting, and you will sacrifice children to maintain the narrative.
/r/MensRights28/12/24 11:39 AM
5

Rape culture is feminist claptrap that can not be substantiated in any first world country with evidence. It is an Appeal to Emotion phrase designed to short-circuit conversations and 'win' arguments. How many other brigaders came along with you?
/r/MensRights28/12/24 11:35 AM
3

Of course you do, you are a brigader who has never been here before, but now have so much to say.
/r/MensRights28/12/24 11:33 AM
8

You could search the words 'IPV lesbians' in this sub, and multiple topics will come up with the data. Its interesting that you have not seen it, like you are following a narrative.
/r/MensRights28/12/24 11:31 AM
2

Lol alright then, you have a good day.
/r/MensRights28/12/24 09:19 AM
7

Black women voted for Harris because she is the closest thing to a black female presidential candidate they will likely ever get, is an AKA like many other black female politicians, and is a part of the Boule gynocracy. It doesn't help that she was living the Myth of White Womanhood; Harris was what they all aspire to be in their heart of hearts. Abortion had exactly fuckall to do with this election, not even top 5 issues to the voting public.
/r/MensRights28/12/24 08:18 AM
7

You understand what 'framing' is, right? Describe Travis Kelsey, please.
/r/MensRights28/12/24 08:13 AM
11

The dismissive, contemptuous framing of men in the entire article is the problem.
/r/MensRights28/12/24 06:16 AM
21

Trump won because white women supported him, which only seemed to surprise black women who expected white women to turn on white men the way black women turned on black men. I said what I goddamn said.
/r/MensRights28/12/24 06:15 AM
84

I heard a fairly learned man say 'Empathy is not an innate talent, it is a learned skill that must be taught; if you are not taught to empathize with a specific group, you will not be able to empathize or understand them'. Using that as a basis of context, and knowing that women tend to objectify (a harsher person would say 'dehumanize') 'Men The Group', it makes sense. Add to that, the light bulb turns on when she has a son, and realizes 'males are people, too!' because 'male' includes that bub…
/r/MensRights28/12/24 06:01 AM
2

You are the one making blanket objections, but we have piles a data showing that women are not held to the same standard of guilt as men for similar violent acts. If you disagree that it is not due to their sex, then bring up a reasonable alternative idea. You are engaging in intellectual dishonesty right now, and I'm giving you the opportunity to make a rational argument to be heard.
/r/EverydayMisandry28/12/24 05:07 AM
2

I would feel differently were it not for the fact that men are such a mystery box to OOP that she actually can not interact with men in a way that is absent hostility or contention. Being nice to someone should not be a challenge, but now it is, and no one seems to ever ask 'why is that?'.
/r/EverydayMisandry28/12/24 04:42 AM
4

I dont make excuses for bigots, and neither should you.
/r/EverydayMisandry28/12/24 04:37 AM
2

Theorize then. Propose an alternative.
/r/EverydayMisandry28/12/24 04:35 AM
15

It is engagement bait from far away, tho.
/r/EverydayMisandry28/12/24 04:25 AM
5

Ah, Intersectionality failing again 🤣 it reminds me of when Intersectionality was put to academic rigor and testing, and while black women are considered the most suppressed group by Intersectionality, they discovered, with empirical evidence, it was actually black men that were the most suppressed. After that, academics starting speaking out against empirical evidence as a metric. That's when shit like 'my truth' and 'the personal is political' started popping up.
/r/EverydayMisandry28/12/24 04:22 AM
20

Progressive in the streets, tradcon in the sheets 🤣 I recall a study being spoken of that talked about how 'traditional', even 'regressive', women became when in came to dating men in particular, regardless of their beliefs in other areas of their lives, and how it was a reasonable predictor of other beliefs.
/r/EverydayMisandry28/12/24 04:18 AM
28

This is basic radfem speak; managed to hit all the talking points. Notice how the implication of queerness is layered heavily in all of this. That is not an accident.
/r/EverydayMisandry28/12/24 04:13 AM
11

I would like to hear your reasons and counterarguments.
/r/MensRights27/12/24 04:01 AM
84

You need to look at who is funding the research. Dr T. Hasan Johnson has said for years that you have many (feminist and no) researchers trying to intellectualize their misandry, getting a paycheck out of their bigotry.
/r/MensRights26/12/24 05:12 PM
1

I'll say it because no one else will: she was flexing her power to regulate the 'big dumb circus monkey' because she could. Power and ego tripping on display, with a dash of 'how dare this NEGRO raise his voice at me!'. Shouldn't surprise anyone, and doesn't surprise me.
/r/MensRights26/12/24 01:50 PM
2

I am taking you at your word, and now you are backpedaling because you realize you spoke too freely, showing your actual hand. Most of us here already know what time 'feminists' are on because we can look at the laws passed, what policy feminist NGOs support and advocate for, and which feminists get lauded. You are the one trying to carry water in a leaky bucket.
/r/MensRights26/12/24 01:35 PM
5

Hey, everyone? This is that 'lack of empathy for men' we talk about here in print. This poster doesn't care about the burdens that men are forced to carry by the state, so long as women benefit. This is the onset of de jure 2nd class citizenship.
/r/MensRights26/12/24 03:21 AM
5

Yes, because that means it is being gatekept via buearocracy (sp?). Approaching the courts means it requires both money and exposure, AND you can have your request rejected if the court doesn't deem it 'necessary'. It is rarely granted, as far as I know.
/r/MensRights26/12/24 03:18 AM
6

Their goal is to protect themselves and their 'sisters', because they know it could be them one day. United in dishonesty.
/r/MensRights26/12/24 03:16 AM
10

Situations like this is why it should be required at birth. Now you don't need to ask, no awkward situations.
/r/MensRights26/12/24 03:12 AM
2

And passport privilege? What does that mean? Americans are generally looked at as upper class people due to access to money and education in most nations around the world. The blue passport, for a man, makes him a top 20% individual just by having it in most nations he visits, with the access to women that status carries.
/r/MensRights26/12/24 03:06 AM
3

It's likely an alt account from a troll that was banned.
/r/EverydayMisandry24/12/24 06:09 AM
5

The issue you are running headlong in to is fundamentally not understanding men are human beings, because I mightily doubt you would say the same things you have said here to say, the recent school shooter, had she survived. There is a lot of objectification in your post; the idea that men are either broken tools or mangled women that need to be 'fixed' permeates your posts, and I can almost smell the gender theory in them.
/r/EverydayMisandry24/12/24 06:07 AM
5

Whenever women do something heinous, they are segregated into the "monstrously evil one-off" category, with a bit of "some man somewhere is to blame" thrown in. Rupanow has entered the chat
/r/EverydayMisandry24/12/24 06:03 AM
52

Men are turning to men who tell them they are not defective women who need to be 'fixed'. News at 5!
/r/MensRights22/12/24 03:06 PM
1

Not in most western nations, to most western women. However, if you want children, then get married, and don't subject the children to that brand of disfunction.
/r/MensRights22/12/24 07:42 AM
2

Depends very much on what spaces you are in. Black (and white) feminists have been demonizing black men in particular outright since the 1850s; some of the most enduring negative stereotypes about black men were created and spread by feminists. Movies like Alice Walkers' 'The Color Purple' is a cultural touchstone, as well as such ideas like Kimberly Crenshaw's Intersectionality, both of which particularly describe black men as monsters 'worse than the slave master', to reference Sojourner Truth…
/r/MensRights22/12/24 05:29 AM
1

regressive Then they need to exercise their power at the ballot box.
/r/MensRights21/12/24 03:29 PM
2

See the current top comment.
/r/MensRights21/12/24 05:59 AM
20

If you shout in the street "all blacks are pigs." You'll get shouted down or beat up. Depends on what street you are on 🤣
/r/EverydayMisandry21/12/24 03:13 AM
1

Ooh, this is the truth. I told my wife that if she ever betrayed my trust, I would never date women again, not in this country. My wife of one of 2 women I have ever trusted fully, and the other was [REDACTED].
/r/MensRights20/12/24 03:59 PM
1

My first concrete experience with this I have seen happened in... 2nd grade?
/r/MensRights20/12/24 03:52 PM
3

Is there a word that describes misandrist homophobia in particular? I know 'Androphobia' is a word, but not the right one. Edit: don't forget Bisexual men too!
/r/EverydayMisandry20/12/24 03:35 PM
2

Call me when this is repealed because too many men are using it to their benefit 🤣
/r/MensRights20/12/24 08:24 AM
1

This amuses me, because in many other cultures, a man can put hands on a woman if she steps in to a masculine mindset, ie 'Act like a man, get treated like one'. In those societies, the men understand you don't raise your voice to other men in anger, or strike other men out of belligerence, because now you have escalated to a violent response. However, in western nations, the man is expected to be the meek one in the face of aggression by women. Look at the criminal statistics and notice how vio…
/r/EverydayMisandry20/12/24 04:51 AM
15

until they are forced to do something to manage your emotional state for you. Male patterned emotional labor, you say?
/r/EverydayMisandry20/12/24 01:37 AM
9

I really don't understand why some lesbians feel the need to disparage men whenever they talk about their sexuality Jealousy.
/r/EverydayMisandry20/12/24 01:32 AM
2

The part that got me was 'men are seducers, women are pretty'. They don't know that the highest rated quality men consistently rate in women is being nice, both to themselves and to others.
/r/EverydayMisandry18/12/24 10:52 PM
-1

americans are inclusive and sensitive to "bad words" to a fault That is both recent and not nearly as true as the media would have you think, given the extremely racialized background of America.
/r/MensRights18/12/24 10:20 PM
3

Because I understand her speech pattern, and I'm mocking her for it.
/r/MensRights18/12/24 11:48 AM
5

incel subreddit You know you could just go to 2x or one of the dating subs catering to women for the exact same language, right?
/r/EverydayMisandry18/12/24 06:39 AM
2

Real American speaks, what else is new?
/r/MensRights18/12/24 06:08 AM
3

Oh, so a racist AND a misandrist? Almost like they go together. A real American.
/r/MensRights18/12/24 05:57 AM
1

People are gonna try and claim she is "far right" because she used the n word No, that just makes her an American.
/r/MensRights18/12/24 05:39 AM
3

Yea, true. Usually the woman finds some poor schmuck to crash out for her and pitbull at her command, leaving her out of the statistics. Unless you think Proxy Violence doesn't exist?
/r/MensRights18/12/24 05:38 AM
1

Miss, you realize.you are speaking to the white boys here the way you are used to speaking to black men, and they aren't going to listen to that, right? This internet making you forget you aren't the white woman you want to be.
/r/MensRights18/12/24 05:31 AM
1

The notion of dealing with men/masculinity = dealing with violence is false and reductive That's your brain on intersectional feminism.
/r/MensRights18/12/24 05:25 AM
4

Her pitbull.
/r/EverydayMisandry17/12/24 06:57 AM
3

Derrick Jaxn still has a huge following on tiktok. They will not learn, because toxic dudes like him are what they actually want.
/r/EverydayMisandry17/12/24 06:43 AM
5

I had commented once before that for most women, 'violence' is a theoretical concept, not a part of living on earth, and so considerations of such things doesn't even come to mind. This is actually a recent thing, as for that. My grandmother said to me once that she had to protect her husband from violence, because his role as her guardian meant he would be risking his life for her sake.
/r/EverydayMisandry17/12/24 06:14 AM
2

Damn, that sub is absurd.
/r/MensRights15/12/24 07:04 PM
2

Duluth Model. I dont need a video, I can point to policy that has influenced multiple nations.
/r/MensRights15/12/24 05:27 PM
2

It references bell hooks in her assertions that black men take part in a suicidal, ultraviolent pseudo-masculinity; her statement about the Central Park 5 says this almost outright. As for pop culture, it does not lead to national, or international policy being made. Andrew Tate has not created something like the Duluth Model, which has influenced policy the world over.
/r/EverydayMisandry15/12/24 04:51 PM
1

True, but using words properly in the correct context is important. If we were talking about say, China, patriarchy is absolutely a thing that is present. Most western societies are a state sanctioned gynocracy at this point. Even then, patriarchy is a social agreement, just like matriarchy is a social agreement. It is something you agree to, not something you are forced in to.
/r/EverydayMisandry15/12/24 04:46 PM
15

There is, when you use the word correctly. This isn't one of those times.
/r/EverydayMisandry14/12/24 09:44 PM
3

Dr. T. Hasan Johnson, Dr. Ronald Neal, and Dr. Tommy Curry are my go to. Each has years of experience eloquently stating the case for men and boys, with dozens of papers and books between them.
/r/MensRights14/12/24 06:50 PM
6

I think they are referring to Obama's 'Dear Colleagues' letter to universities that created the environment for tilted decisions against male students accused of SA.
/r/MensRights14/12/24 06:48 PM
1

Quite welcome 🙏
/r/MensRights14/12/24 02:11 PM
7

Op, having read this, this response has little to do with feminism, and is almost everything to do with racism. These professors are taking acceptable shots, because the face of 'DEI' is not white females (the way it should be). Edit: actual academics who spoke out against feminism is men like Dr. Tommy Curry, who has been doing it for years, and was run out of the US for it.
/r/MensRights14/12/24 03:28 AM
2

Andrew Tate's opinions do not hold the same weight as a PhD. If the supposedly most learned of us, who have ears in government and who's reports and studies influence nationwide policy, can call black men 'bullet bags' in reference to bell hooks, what does that mean for us all?
/r/EverydayMisandry13/12/24 05:59 PM
5

I made it an incontrovertible point to tell my wife that I will engage with my hobbies, responsibly, and if she could not handle that, find another tall, dark, handsome rogue to love. She is now in my expansive pnp gaming circle 😅
/r/MenSupportMen13/12/24 01:42 PM
1

My wife needed some deprogramming from her time in university, and I had to sit down with her and gently explain how all of the 'man things' she wanted from our relationship were actually all patriarchal, and I even got her to admit to why she was attracted to me (all the wrong reasons lol). I was lucky that she is honest to a fault, and doesn't really have the guile to lie on the spot. We talked a long time about what we both wanted, and came to an agreement, albeit not without some controversy…
/r/MensRights13/12/24 08:30 AM
2

partnership I stand firm in my belief that most women do not want actual 'partnership' (nor do most men for that matter) because in an actual partnership, you are supposed to listen to and heed each other. How many of these women claiming partnership also are prepared to do what a man tells them to do, as much as they expect the man to do as they say? Or go halfsies on home labors traditionally considered 'man work'? Yea, gurl, take out that garbage, spackle that hole in the wall, and recaulk th…
/r/MensRights13/12/24 08:01 AM
2

'I will cut off my right arm before I agree to allow Negro men to vote.' Who said that?
/r/MensRights13/12/24 07:19 AM
10

Feelings, not facts.
/r/EverydayMisandry13/12/24 07:16 AM
1

Op, my dad was the model of what a man should be like. I encourage you to be that model for your children; not the invulnerable cowboy on a Whitehorse, but a man, warts and all, that strives to do the right thing, even if you fail. Your children will see it, even if only later. I only came to respect my dad more as I got older.
/r/MensRights13/12/24 05:53 AM
2

What's your blog?
/r/MensRights13/12/24 05:00 AM
29

For the most part, men don't really have a problem with their aculturation; we understand duty and fidelity to others from a fairly young age, and I see this even in my young sons. What bothers most guys, I think, is doing that duty for no reward or positive outcome, or even respect.
/r/MensRights13/12/24 04:53 AM
3

Schrodinger's Feminist, again? It is a defective argument, since you can and will find horribly racist and misandrist statements by well known feminist academics on Twitter, and no one is trying to kick them out of the feminist club.
/r/EverydayMisandry13/12/24 04:36 AM
1

People are strange like that.
/r/EverydayMisandry12/12/24 01:59 AM
3

Racism is primarily a misandric enterprise. It crushes the out-group men, and co-opts the out-group women. And it works. Read 'The Dating Divide'.
/r/EverydayMisandry11/12/24 01:55 PM
1

I care about you, brother. The world may be cold, but we walk the path together, and we are never alone!
/r/MensRights10/12/24 08:34 AM
40

Op, I have seen a number of such sources get scrubbed from the internet. I encourage you to use something like Evernote to save these sources while they are here, because I think when sh8t starts getting real, they are going to vanish 'for reasons'.
/r/MensRights10/12/24 08:22 AM
8

Things like this make me look askance at people when they say 'Its just the internet!'. When I respond with 'Incels are on the internet, too, why don't you ignore them?', I get huffing and nonsense.
/r/EverydayMisandry09/12/24 06:39 PM
1

why do rape sites exist!? Because women enjoy the fantasy, too.
/r/EverydayMisandry09/12/24 06:36 PM
1

Use this on a black woman, marvel at the answer. Op is one of those guys who thinks the western opinion of black men is something positive. I would tell OP to go in to black spaces and listen for a little while to dispel this notion.
/r/EverydayMisandry09/12/24 06:30 PM
5

He may have gotten a 'termination letter' when he decided he didn't want to be the office boy toy anymore. The same thing happened with the DA in Atlanta, the one who was in charge of President Elect Trump's trial, and that was discovered a year later.
/r/MensRights09/12/24 12:38 PM
23

30 minutes after he reported her to human resources, she tried to fire him So the entire association is in on the fix?
/r/MensRights09/12/24 06:47 AM
3

This is Patriarchy by Feminist specifications, where men still provide the labor, money and emotional massaging, without any authority or voice. Man funds, woman runs.
/r/EverydayMisandry09/12/24 05:42 AM
-1

Yes, and I am saying that 'Marxism' in this situation is a fig lea feminism used to gain power, just like feminists used Abolitionists and the Civil Rights Movement to gain power. Feminists are basic Neo-Liberal capitalists, hungry for money, power and status. There is no greater calling, and it is everywhere in their writing. The mos damning proof is how mainline feminism killed the Marxist feminist movement back in the 80s, and all you see now are parroting birds on Twitter trying to claim it.
/r/MensRights08/12/24 03:27 PM
-1

That has nothing to do with 'Marxism', and is bottom bitch power grabbing to become the new elite, which has always been the goal of feminism. People take the Marxism thing too seriously, instead of looking at historical trends and the writings. At best, it is a red herring.
/r/MensRights08/12/24 03:14 PM
6

It's not interesting, it's a very basic power play.
/r/MensRights08/12/24 01:47 PM
13

Op was approaching the same argument his interlocutor was; you are bringing up a different argument no one broached. To further go on with Op's argument, the common rape of boys, by men and women, in Afghanistan is completely ignored. I would love to hear you justify this.
/r/MensRights08/12/24 01:38 PM
-1

Reading the literature, I think what it actually calls for is for people to be evened out, and for that status to be maintained by ethical govt structure to make sure the status quo isn't co-opted by the 'more equal', a la USSR, or the current status of corporations in the Neo-Liberal structure today.
/r/MensRights08/12/24 01:33 PM
0

Fuck off and don't come back.
/r/MensRights08/12/24 09:08 AM
1

And no one can see it, so you said nothing. Honestly, that may really be the best thing you could do: listen to understand, not listen to respond.
/r/MensRights08/12/24 08:44 AM
0

What is the point of this comment To point out that you are a fucking idiot and you need to stop talking about something your own words prove you know nothing about. I only said he is fairing better than a woman in this scenario? Yes, in the imaginary scenario you made up, which requires a ring, gloves, and a referee. Not a mugging on the street, or a drunken brawl in a bar, or being jumped by your opps. Go to a gym, get punched in the face a few times, and come back when you talk to people who …
/r/MensRights08/12/24 08:42 AM
1

You will have to comment again, because you either deleted it or you ran in to one of the banned phrases of this sub..
/r/MensRights08/12/24 08:33 AM
2

the walking home thing doesn’t make sense at all It seems to make a lot of sense to a fair few men here. If you aren't a man, you would likely be better served listening and asking questions while accepting the answers. Your comment speaks plainly that you can not empathize with the male lived experience; which is fine, unless you see fit to offer your ill informed commentary.
/r/MensRights08/12/24 08:12 AM
2

Encouraging men in to actively supporting each other in a similar fashion that society pushes men to support women, if I could hazard a guess. You aren't a man, are you?
/r/MensRights08/12/24 07:33 AM
1

There is this imaginary scenario made up by people who have never fought anyone that 'a guy can defend himself against other men'. Homeboy, a difference of 20lbs in raw weight is enough to decisively swing a fight in the heavier man's favor. This is in a straight forward, looking at each other in bright lights scenario. Add in inebriation, darkness, or someone getting the first good hit in/suckerpunch, and its fucking over. I hate people who do not understand streetfighting scenarios but speak a…
/r/MensRights08/12/24 07:31 AM
11

This puts to paid the lie that 'feminism also helps men', because they need to wheedle this hard to get people to even consider actually helping men.
/r/EverydayMisandry08/12/24 07:24 AM
1

You get used to it after a while. t. The Black Delegation
/r/EverydayMisandry08/12/24 04:33 AM
4

Sounds like a Title IX suit!
/r/EverydayMisandry08/12/24 04:28 AM
1

I'm stronger for the pain, and have gotten an understanding of what the world is like. My abuser... sigh, it's complicated. She was a family friend, and there are a lot mixed feelings there.
/r/MensRights07/12/24 05:18 PM
1

James Brown, anyone?
/r/MensRights07/12/24 02:45 PM
1

I'm glad you are still around, brother; a lot of our information sources tend to vanish.
/r/MensRights07/12/24 01:20 PM
1

Sister, if you are serious about this, I can recommend 2 books for you to read. They are heavy as hell, but they are fantastically informative. The Man-Not, by Dr. Tommie Curry Anti-black Misandry, by Dr. T. Hasan Johnson. Also: https://newblackmasculinities.wordpress.com/2020/09/24/the-black-male-political-agenda-by-t-hasan-johnson-ph-d/
/r/MensRights07/12/24 01:19 PM
4

More black men are waking up and rejecting the idea that they must be serfs and concubines for the black gynocracy, as well as rejecting SIGN language in the attempt to control their bodies. That is why things like Passport Bros became a thing, as well as SYSBM. It is a tacit recognition that too many black women are co-opted by a social order inimical to the black community, the 'right arm of white supremacy', and need to escape.
/r/MensRights07/12/24 01:10 PM
1

Well, with good fortune, a group of PhD's, lawyers, economists and such have a entire listing of problems concerning (black) men and boys, why they have come to be, and what can be done about it regarding policy. https://newblackmasculinities.wordpress.com/2020/09/24/the-black-male-political-agenda-by-t-hasan-johnson-ph-d/
/r/MensRights07/12/24 01:02 PM
5

Don't hold your breath, but Op is getting roasted pretty squarely. I expect there to be screencaps taken and posted in other subs for mocking purposes.
/r/MensRights07/12/24 12:59 PM
7

I think you need to read about the history of feminism, rather than the pop culture take on it. Read the Declaration of Sentiments, the seminal feminist text, and how it explicitly was a cause created by elite white women so they could have the same hard power as elite white men, while maintaining the advantages that these same elite women had in terms of soft power and benevolent sexism. Feminism is explicitly racist, classist, and elitist from its introduction. Dr. Tommie Curry has written 2 b…
/r/MensRights07/12/24 12:55 PM
5

what aspect of men’s healthcare rights is being infringed upon right now? Men have no legal right to their genetic material, which is why spermjacking is legal, and the foreskin of male babies can be sold by hospitals to pharmaceutical industry without the permission of the parents. What aspect of men’s education is being infringed upon? The rising failure of boys in education and how the ratio of female to male students in higher education is greater now than what male to female students was in…
/r/MensRights07/12/24 12:51 PM
1

Took years for the books to come about, and I'm thankful they are here now.
/r/EverydayMisandry07/12/24 12:25 PM
6

Racism is, and always has been, about suppressing the men and co-opting the women. Dr. James Sidanious' 'Social Dominance Theory' goes in to this, as well as books like 'The Man-Not' by Dr. Tommie Curry.
/r/EverydayMisandry07/12/24 09:22 AM
2

She is an example of how the industry gets in a woman's head. Rihanna was a well known industry passaround; Ashton Kutcher slammed his door in his face, then she ended up with a (black) man she doesn't respect.
/r/EverydayMisandry07/12/24 09:20 AM
2

“Female coded”? Men and women speak different emotional languages. A woman’s “mental wavelength”? Yes, the feminine mindset. Straight men are “unknowable and aloof”? To women, who are no longer taught how to understand the male emotional landscape, straight men are unknowable. This is the core conceit of the 'man vs bear' argument: men are unknowable, intelligent AND dangerous, so better to pick the bear because a bear is easier to understand. Women do not understand men or men's mentality, are …
/r/MensRights06/12/24 11:57 AM
9

I was raped by an older women from age 5-7. It took me until my early 20s to realize what happened to me was wrong, and the first time I spoke of it to a group of people, they ignored me. I took some good from it all, tho.
/r/MensRights06/12/24 07:50 AM
4

Its paraded as a shield against criticism; empty, cynical theatrics.
/r/EverydayMisandry06/12/24 05:36 AM
-2

“perform femininity In my experience, it's being able to present your emotional complex in a female coded way; women 'get' you because you are operating on their mental wavelength, and you are no longer the unknowable, aloof man in their eyes. Amusingly, this is the basis of how pimps and PUA works, because you use your understanding of women's emotional complex with your masculine standing to regulate her emotions for her, to mutual benefit. I may or may not have known an old school mack who ta…
/r/MensRights06/12/24 04:06 AM
2

Thats what it may look like on the outside, but I am old enough to remember how in the 80s and 90s, black men were the face of domestic violence, and things like the Willie Horton commercials and 'Super Predators'. In fact, speaking about the White Hegemonic Order has gotten the derisive moniker 'Hotep', and black feminists have said, almost verbatim, that black men oppress black women more than white men. I think OP, and you, are not actually in black spaces enough to see what is really being s…
/r/MensRights05/12/24 03:13 PM
7

I would ask OP to read the works of Pauli Murray, Kimberly Crenshaw, and bell hooks, or watch cultural touchstone movies like 'The Color Purple'. The idea that misogyny is 'ignored' in the black community is fucking laughable. In fact, black feminist works have created much of the current glut of negative stereotypes about black men, such that men like Dr. Tommie Curry and Dr. T. Hasan Johnson have had to fight to prove their inaccuracy for their entire academic careers.
/r/MensRights05/12/24 10:26 AM
10

Absolutely save those data points whenever you find them! There was a CDC study released in 2015, iirc, about rates of contraceptive usage among disaggregated groups in America, and it spoke how black males use contraceptives more than all other groups of men, and black women used them the least of all women. This study has straight up vanished from the internet, and it isn't the only one that I've seen quietly disappear. You find them, save them.
/r/MensRights05/12/24 05:47 AM
2

I have heard 'niggas ain't shit' since I was 6 years old; casual misandry is rife and endemic in my community. You learn real quick to rise above it, or get ground down to powder. The perception of black men by white supremacists and feminists is treated as gospel truth by black people.
/r/MensRights04/12/24 07:18 AM
0

So if it was so profitable why didn't people in Africa set up their own cotton fields Soil quality is different, cotton would be hard to grow outside specific areas, such that it would not make for a cash crop. better yet export those extremely valuable minerals. Requires modern mining methods to reach. Strange it's such a poor continent, right? Not strange, until this last year, European and American interests still dominated the African continent, stealing natural resources for pennies to the …
/r/MensRights04/12/24 07:15 AM
11

Read the book, 'Beyond Title VII'. The school system is the way it is now on purpose; boys scholastically failing was and is an intentional part of the plan. Even then, single sex male schools, like the Chicago Boy's High School, produce an 90% college acceptance rate, with all male teachers. When many students fail, you blame the teacher, not the students. Not look at the majority of teachers.
/r/MensRights04/12/24 05:36 AM
2

We call that 'Dirty Mackin' round my way.
/r/MensRights04/12/24 05:33 AM
36

Because white women dominate teaching, and any career that is majority white women can not be held publicly accountable. See nursing, psychology, mothers in general.
/r/MensRights04/12/24 05:31 AM
11

Gamma Bias, also, brown men are a dangerous threat, so don't save them.
/r/EverydayMisandry04/12/24 03:29 AM
1

Broski, would you either copying this to the sub itself, or mind if I quote it? I am salivating at the idea of watching idiot heads pop like its the movie 'Scanners' 🤣🤣
/r/MensRights03/12/24 12:19 PM
14

The problem comes along when any talk of endemic cultural issues with women in a society is regarded as 'misogyny' as a method to shut down discussion. It is a distinctly weaponized term.
/r/MensRights03/12/24 09:39 AM
9

It's the Freudian definition of 'Penis Envy': they are jealous of men for their inherent 'Maleness' Any time you see feminists speak, filter whatever is being said through the framing of Projection and Penis Envy, and I guarantee it will make sense.
/r/MensRights03/12/24 06:40 AM
10

Read the book, 'Beyond Title VII', it talks about how the school system was captured. The model student in education since the 70s was the white female child, and the more you deviant from that model student, the more punitively you are treated.
/r/MensRights02/12/24 12:40 PM
26

Oh, I'm sorry, Obama didn't come out and publicly try to shame, guilt and insult black men in to voting for Harris. Fuck outta here.
/r/MensRights01/12/24 09:06 PM
11

Dr. James Sidanious' 'Social Dominance Theory' should be required reading for most people.
/r/EverydayMisandry01/12/24 01:54 PM
25

But let me hear about 'locker room talk' again 🤣
/r/EverydayMisandry30/11/24 05:19 AM
6

Dr. Richard Reeves recently did an interview talking about many of the topics you brought up here. I think most people should watch it.
/r/MensRights29/11/24 05:09 PM
1

then what? National security, actually. You can not protect the borders of a nation the size of the US without a sizable population, especially since America is no longer the clear cut military world power. Remember when I said 'Its not about you'? Its still not about you, it's about protecting a entire country, which is more than the sum of its individual citizens. Further, you don't screech like this over Selective Service, or the millions that die daily to maintain the American hegemony. Your…
/r/MensRights27/11/24 12:47 PM
2

denying the disproportionate sexual violence against women is akin to ignoring racism No, its not, and don't use my battles as a Black man to fuel your misandrist bullshit. You are a part of my problem, because your rhetoric is particularly weaponized against black men and boys to pathologize us; it is a direct threat to my freedom and life.
/r/EverydayMisandry27/11/24 06:01 AM
1

On my side of the street, we remark about how white men are now being treated like black men, and Brad really doesn't want to be Jermaine 🤣
/r/MensRights27/11/24 04:18 AM
2

The no stupid questions sub, asking about 'why girls are raised sternly and boys are coddled'. I've dealt with that attitude before, from men and women, and what I found was that the women still carry these deep wounds from childhood from the perception they were treated differently from their brothers. There is a simmering resentment and jealousy from what they perceived as 'preferential treatment' that I have not seen in the boys I've mentored or the men I've coached. Unfortunately, I can rare…
/r/EverydayMisandry26/11/24 05:47 AM
3

I dont think most young women are capable of helping a young man grow due to a stunted Divine Feminine and a wounded adolescent that has never healed. A thread I was in a few days ago was full of examples of such.
/r/EverydayMisandry26/11/24 05:31 AM
3

Presenting your emotions in a way women can understand.
/r/EverydayMisandry26/11/24 05:26 AM
1

You need to read a history book and stop talking.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/11/24 03:39 PM
1

Your analysis has nothing to do with reality, and everything to do with lack of historical basis and feelings. Its why it is not working.
/r/EverydayMisandry25/11/24 03:38 PM
2

Homeboy was ruthless 🤣
/r/EverydayMisandry25/11/24 03:28 PM
1

Not all feminism is white feminism. The only feminism you have any experience with is white feminism, because white (real) feminism subsumed or destroyed all its Jonny come lately imitators. Thats why 'Intersectionality' is no longer centered on black women as it was created to, for example. I think you have an idea of something that history doesn't support.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/11/24 03:27 PM
5

Now this makes sense. Proxy Violence via the state.
/r/EverydayMisandry25/11/24 01:36 PM
1

Yes, and the list is not exhaustive. Concerning children, look up 'Maternal Child Gatekeeping'.
/r/MensRights25/11/24 09:25 AM
34

If you haven't seen this news already, its because you don't care to.
/r/PussyPassDenied24/11/24 02:33 PM
10

I am wary of most women, personally, and I don't think anyone around me realizes it because I do not confused wariness with antipathy.
/r/EverydayMisandry24/11/24 02:31 PM
1

He got downvoted for shitposts that did not actually add anything to the conversation.
/r/MensRights23/11/24 09:33 PM
1

I don’t understand why he is so popular There are a lot of guys who agree with him, simple as that.
/r/MensRights23/11/24 09:30 PM
1

trying You mean 'have'. A real 'leopards ate my face' moment.
/r/MensRights23/11/24 09:17 PM
2

This is a list of relationship problems that men can, and do, face.
/r/MensRights22/11/24 03:27 PM
2

Who do you think OP is talking about? Unless you are one, and you think all of them are you?
/r/EverydayMisandry22/11/24 09:39 AM
4

I dug my way out of it before it ruined me. Almost got my brother's marriage tho. I do not talk to her often. Make sure there is a degree of separation at all times.
/r/MensRights22/11/24 07:00 AM
2

I made a post about my childhood. It was... unpleasant.
/r/MensRights22/11/24 06:26 AM
3

It's nice when the trolls come out and reveal themselves. Edit: you are also uneducated. Bill Clinton already said why the abortion laws are being passed, and its the same reason so many illegal immigrants are being allowed in to the country. Your ego makes you think its about you. Its not, and you aren't that important.
/r/MensRights22/11/24 05:33 AM
2

Hi! I think a better statement would be 'Women can only love their sons unconditionally'; it allows for the ones who do not love their sons.
/r/MensRights22/11/24 05:31 AM
3

Shh, don't tell him about the honor killings that are inflicted on men far more than women, the child slavery and rape that affects boys far more than girls, the abysmal lifespans of men in general...
/r/MensRights22/11/24 05:30 AM
1

I dont think its hate for most. I do think there is a low boiling contempt borne of a kernel of jealousy that is fanned alight by societal messaging. Google 'Tangle of Pathology', and see if it lines up .
/r/MensRights22/11/24 05:27 AM
3

Yes
/r/EverydayMisandry22/11/24 04:48 AM
2

No, just basic misandry.
/r/EverydayMisandry22/11/24 04:47 AM
4

You are a man, that's why.
/r/EverydayMisandry22/11/24 04:46 AM
46

Yes, those statistics that show that women abuse men as much as men abuse women, and that women both abuse and murder children more than men. I'm sorry, you meant those other statistics that make women look like helpless, wilting flowers 🙄
/r/EverydayMisandry21/11/24 04:54 AM
5

I agree that past behavior should not be the sole judgment on a person, but it often times is exactly that, and you see it irl now. Cancel culture thrives on such things.
/r/EverydayMisandry20/11/24 10:12 PM
21

That is actually more dependant on egg quality, which in women begins to drop at age 25. For men, the drop off happens after 45. The real problem for the man is being unable to keep up with your kids; it gets real hard in your 40s, as I very well know.
/r/MensRights20/11/24 02:23 PM
1

the news is always filled with reports that rapists are getting released early. Yes; most of them are women.
/r/EverydayMisandry20/11/24 02:03 PM
5

❤❤❤
/r/EverydayMisandry20/11/24 01:46 AM
10

Man, so many times I could have used this.
/r/EverydayMisandry20/11/24 01:43 AM
18

Homeboy, do you actually interact with men? Not even hard-core gangbangers will tolerate an actual rapist among their midst, they will kill him themselves, unless their is a vanishingly small list of exceptional circumstances, like this is your older brother that has saved your life repeatedly. Unlike the nonsense in OP, we living, breathing, not strawman men know that guys who do scumbag shit almost always keep it to themselves because the negative consequence for saying it out loud is death, u…
/r/EverydayMisandry20/11/24 01:42 AM
9

Whoever wrote this doesn't know men, understand relationships between men, and is inserting their knowledge of the relationships between women instead. There is another post discussing women's tendency to ignore, accept, and/or defend bad behavior by women in their circle. This is right up there with the 'locker room talk' scenario, except any man will tell you women tend to be FAR more crude and invasive when talking about vulgarity than men. The locker room talk speech only makes sense if wome…
/r/EverydayMisandry20/11/24 01:34 AM
5

I'd love to hear the rest of the lesson; likely turned into some schlock about 'toxic masculinity' 🙄
/r/EverydayMisandry20/11/24 01:29 AM
26

Better tell that to your middle school teachers, then. They been getting pretty wild in these classrooms.
/r/EverydayMisandry19/11/24 03:27 PM
0

The rise of communism 2nd wave feminism came up with the rise of Neo-Liberalism, which is explicitly a capitalist enterprise, and you are ignoring how I said feminists use whatever movement du jure and the abandons them later. There is a reason feminism concentrates on being the CEO instead of bringing the CEO down to earth the way communism would encourage, or why feminists discourage the rewriting of divorce laws that eliminate alimony, child support or division of assets, which would also be …
/r/MensRights19/11/24 03:22 PM
3

Op, add to this the book 'White Women's Rights', it adds another angle in to how self serving the entire debacle is.
/r/MensRights19/11/24 02:01 PM
2

Marxist Heavily disagree, because feminism predates Marxism, and feminism is a racialized elitist grift about creating a new elite class made up of both elite white women and men, and the feminists said this almost verbatim. Feminists have ritually used whatever social movement of the day to push their agenda, from Abolitionism, to Racialism (a large part of racial landscape in America today is due to feminists), to Socialism, to the Civil Rights Movement (watch the documentary about Pauli Murra…
/r/MensRights19/11/24 01:59 PM
3

Do not assume power is only exercised via the hard power men use. Women can and do wield soft power incredibly effectively.
/r/MensRights19/11/24 01:51 PM
42

Notice how most of those descriptions are serving others, not yourself.
/r/EverydayMisandry19/11/24 11:54 AM
1

it just seems to stem from a complete lack of social recognition that men can and do face issues too. Because they aren't taught men are human beings like them. Men are an abstract at best, an idea; that idea usually ends up being some combination of threat, paymaster, background object, or sex toy.
/r/MensRights19/11/24 11:48 AM
2

Same thing.
/r/MensRights19/11/24 06:00 AM
6

Shitposter, or bot? Hard to tell.
/r/MensRights19/11/24 05:39 AM
8

. It is also a fact that males are more often the physical instigators You may have to back that up, because the most comprehensive study of IPV said that women do more physical abuse (and abuse in general), but men leave more injuries that investigators use as evidence What you are saying is commonly accepted feminist claptrap that 'feels' right, because of course men are more violent, so its easy to swallow. That is why what is being spoken of here is so pervasive, because it 'feels' right, in…
/r/MensRights19/11/24 05:37 AM
6

Tender Years Doctrine is still nominal policy, until family law is rewritten at a federal level and mandated for all states.
/r/MensRights19/11/24 05:33 AM
7

Feminism has an incredibly racist, classist, elitist past (and still is for the most part), to the point of being the origin of several still enduring racist trope (including the dangerous rapist black male and the effeminate, unmasculine Chinese male), and I have yet to see a feminist apologize for making the environment more dangerous for minority men or derailing labor reforms. Feminism was created by, and for the benefit of, elite white women, so they could have the power to oppress others e…
/r/MensRights19/11/24 05:31 AM
3

I left and muted that sub after that.
/r/EverydayMisandry18/11/24 04:19 PM
2

No problem 👍
/r/MensRights18/11/24 03:57 PM
1

You are speaking from a very American framing, where negative liberty is the highest virtue. This is part of the reason why social situations in America are so odd (compared to many other societies) and fraught with anxiety inducing moments: no one is sure what the protocols are for 'proper' interaction, and no, 'just be normal' isn't meaningful advice.
/r/MensRights18/11/24 03:54 PM
2

Nope, I doubt she even remembers now. Was nearly 40 years ago.
/r/MensRights18/11/24 12:15 AM
3

by people you mean men? I mean outside the elite class. women weren't allowed to have an acctive voice until way later, That was something initially determined state by state, requiring only that you be a landowner. That then tied in to 2 things: families, ie husband and wife, got one vote, and most women vocally objected to the enfranchisement for women. That is one of those things feminists have almost erased from history, the women's rights, anti-voting bloc of women.
/r/MensRights17/11/24 01:17 PM
6

Then listen to the boys and men speak, before trying to correct them according to your ideology, especially if it doesn't match their lived experiences. I see a lot of people trying to gaslight men in to believing what they think, feel and observe simply can not be what the experience, and I find it deeply offensive. As for that, miss, you are a white woman. You are a threat to me in this white hegemonic society. This culture exists to 'protect' you from men like me with lethal force, and most w…
/r/MensRights17/11/24 01:11 PM
2

I heard a man I respect call Tate 'White Boy's First Nihilist'. His actual message, if you watched past the clips, was that if you aren't rich, tall, and born handsome, you may as well kill yourself because you will get nothing you want in life, especially from women. The elites are fucking terrified of the fact his message was hitting home, because western society depends on white boys, who become men, working themselves to death for the state, its coffers, and its security from the giant risin…
/r/MensRights17/11/24 12:55 PM
5

I agree, but that 20 mil from Melinda Gates will do him good.
/r/MensRights17/11/24 12:50 PM
4

links a post that doesn't exist because the kind if people you truck with will not even confront opposing opinion Not misery, fool. I avoid things that only serve to annoy me; I am here to support men, not argue with misandrists, in the main. There are other subs I go to for that, this isn't it. Now, since you claim to have a 'circle of women', show them this and discuss it with them. https://newblackmasculinities.wordpress.com/2020/09/24/the-black-male-political-agenda-by-t-hasan-johnson-ph-d/ …
/r/MensRights17/11/24 08:31 AM
3

He is called a 'male advocate' by the people who don't like him. I have never heard any of the voices in academia or personal advocation call him anything other than a grifter or a nihilist that said too much of the truth for the elites to be comfortable.
/r/MensRights17/11/24 08:17 AM
3

He will be shut out completely and lose all his funding, like Warren Farrell.
/r/MensRights17/11/24 08:15 AM
3

He has shown repeatedly that he knows the truth, but he absolutely will not confront the feminist mafia directly, instead trying to wheedle his way in to getting women to feel sorry enough for boys to not grind them in to gear lubricant. A lot of us are angered by his spinelessness.
/r/MensRights17/11/24 08:14 AM
5

Alright, misandric (white) men. Little difference, at the end.
/r/MensRights17/11/24 08:02 AM
8

You should talk to actual women about how they view men and what men's role and place in their lives are. To that end, I will not respond further. I make it a point to not interact with users who post in 2x or any related sub; you will inevitably show your misandrist takes (if you haven't already), and I need less misandric (white) women in my existence. Good day and Godspeed.
/r/MensRights17/11/24 07:52 AM
8

Patriarchy by Feminist specifications, you mean. They want the self-serving application of Patriarchy, the paymaster, the soldier, the defender, the romantic, without having to do anything for it, or reciprocate in the way he wants. Both of you are right,.except what you are talking about can also be found in a matriarchy.
/r/MensRights17/11/24 07:32 AM
9

You are very much in the minority, then. Every man, and most boys, I know can talk about finally opening up and it being weaponized against them.
/r/MensRights17/11/24 07:30 AM
12

This is the real work here.
/r/MensRights17/11/24 07:05 AM
16

Not something I've ever said in any post I have made there.
/r/MensRights17/11/24 06:01 AM
26

Bro, this is an episode. No one is going to say your feelings are wrong, but this isn't the sub for emotional outbursts, this has to do with structural, systemic and institutional problems, their discussion and resolutions. The malementalhealth sub is a better place for this if you need emotional support; for better or worse, we understand, but this isn't the place.
/r/MensRights17/11/24 05:31 AM
1

Op, need to add Latino and Asian men now 🤣🤣🤣
/r/EverydayMisandry17/11/24 04:08 AM
1

You are making a bad correlation. The issue you are ignoring is the collapse of European colonial efforts, and being the aid to the American hegemony in the bitch position. If Europe hadn't galivanted across the world inserting itself in to everyone's shit, Europe wouldn't be 'less homogeneous'. They created their problem, and chickens are coming home to roost.
/r/MensRights17/11/24 04:05 AM
19

Because women are not that different lol. An older man (my Unc) told me this about the female teachers that sleep with their male students. 'The boys they fucking are the kind of boys they liked in high school, but didn't get any play from.'. I was like goddamn.
/r/EverydayMisandry16/11/24 01:03 PM
21

Internalized misandry.
/r/EverydayMisandry16/11/24 06:03 AM
11

This question has been getting reposted on a lot of subs lately, incredibly suspicious.
/r/EverydayMisandry16/11/24 05:55 AM
18

Every successful matriarchy also exalted boys and men, because someone figured out that men are the primary driving force of growth and success.
/r/MensRights16/11/24 05:39 AM
1

an anti feminist book? It details how racial privilege was built in to feminism. oh is that another book recommendation? No, just a lamentation/condemnation. they had to have another form of governance that wasn't ruled by a monarch. The idea at the time of regular people having an active voice in government was radical; it had to be actively sold in the colonies.
/r/MensRights16/11/24 01:59 AM
1

you don't happen to know that form "The Suffragette Bombers Britains Forgotten Terrorists" do you? No, this goes back to the Declaration of Sentiments of Seneca Falls, and the book 'White Women's Rights'. Both said this almost verbatim. i mean for some the clueless followers who really beileves feminism is about gender equality it might be. Idiots make for useful tools to advance the cause of others. See black feminists and the boule gynocracy (oooh, I said it). honestly what ideology that claim…
/r/MensRights15/11/24 06:34 PM
4

It all makes sense if you know what feminism began as: a ploy for elite white women to have power and status equal to elite white men. EVERYTHING about it has been in service to its goal; everything said is window dressing in service to this avaricious desire. That is why its contradicts so often: its all bullshit. None of it is actually genuine, its a grift to get women like Nancy Pelosi on to the levers of power.
/r/MensRights15/11/24 01:59 PM
2

Phew, I will tell you one that didn't hit home for me until I was a grown man. My mom took my brother and I Christmas shopping; I was 5 years old, my brother was 12. At the checkout line, my mom handed me the change from the teller, a handful of bills and change. After this, she told to grab a bag. I was wearing overalls, and had no pockets. In a flash of childish brilliance, I hid the money beneath a potted poinsettia in a row on a counter nearby, and grabbed the bag. My mom asked for the chang…
/r/MensRights15/11/24 01:35 PM
1

To wit tho, you were paid in advance for the possibility with a lifetime of being openly valued by your community and family. This is actually an explicit part of how patriarchy worked (and does work) in a variety of cultures; you didn't served first and get the big piece of chicken 'because you were a man', but because as a man, you had a dark duty to fulfill, and were incentivized to do so. Matching sex duties, both important for the community, neither greater than the other. This is the prima…
/r/EverydayMisandry15/11/24 01:16 PM
1

Mr. Z is a black leftist, blue-collar podcast I listen to. He has a good head for male/female fuckery, and does not hesitate to say the kind of things other leftists would cancel him for. I find him refreshing for his type, reminds me of my cousin. As for patriarchy, it is an agreement, not something you can force on people: Social Contract.
/r/MensRights15/11/24 07:32 AM
3

Monstrously abusive. I got a story to tell you later, and it will blow your head off.
/r/MensRights15/11/24 07:29 AM
6

Otherwise known as 'Patriarchy by Feminist specifications'. Thanks, Mr. Z for coining that phrasez, it works.
/r/MensRights15/11/24 06:50 AM
4

Op, you are missing part of the social contract. What men got in exchange for the expectation they would give their lives for the women of their community was deference; every man, no matter his age or status, could expect to receive a certain baseline of respect from every woman and girl in his community, unless he did something so egregious as to lose that respect. This was a world where something like KAM would be unthinkable, because it was tied to the implicit understanding that while some …
/r/EverydayMisandry15/11/24 06:00 AM
6

The starkest, with the benefit of hindsight and growing up to have both eyes open, was my mother. My mother hates men, black men in particular, and seethes with resentment that she actually needed her husband for quality of life. She took it out on her sons, especially as they got older and stopped being cute little boys and became men to be. It was... bad, and affected myself and my brother for our entire lives.
/r/MensRights15/11/24 04:25 AM
11

Read the book 'White Women's Rights'. Feminism has always been a method for elite white women to gain the hard power of elite white men while maintaining their female privilege and feminine soft power. Other groups have adopted this as a part of class aspirations, lusting for the status and prestige that the elite white female embodies in both form and function.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/11/24 06:11 AM
1

You are making a feelings based decision because the truth hurts. The real redpill truth? Women are mere human beings, just as evil, venal, and degenerate as any man, except in this current western culture, less likely to be told this, or have their behavior corrected. That is why they are proving us right; the restraints were taken off, and women have been freed unto madness. They are showing you who they are, and it is not what you were told your entire life. You disagree with reality, not me.…
/r/EverydayMisandry14/11/24 06:04 AM
7

If I said what I wanted, I would probably get banned. So I will say I was watching this case since it first dropped. Not as happy as I could be with the resolution, but satisfied enough.
/r/PussyPassDenied14/11/24 04:24 AM
9

Be in the right spaces. It has been happening online for decades.
/r/EverydayMisandry13/11/24 03:34 PM
5

That has happened to content creators before. Paris Milan had to scrub some of her videos after a avid watcher murdered her boyfriend and child.
/r/EverydayMisandry13/11/24 03:33 PM
15

But now every young man has seen that women's rights = men give up their power then women dominate. Between the book 'White Women's Rights' and the Declaration of Sentiments, feminism has always and explicitly been about the acquisition of hard power.
/r/EverydayMisandry13/11/24 03:31 PM
6

puts on redpill hat Your desire for bluepill life blinds you to the obvious. We were always right, you just couldn't accept it. And were did it lead you? Back to me.
/r/EverydayMisandry13/11/24 03:26 PM
1

Waiting for that thread.
/r/MensRights13/11/24 07:43 AM
1

You need to read in to the broader experience, rather than the take that revolves around you individually (and your *jealousy). ER workers know that most guys are not going to seek medical attention unless the situation is so bad that it means normal activities are nigh impossible, for a host of reasons. Women are more apt to seek it out preventatively. This leads to a feedback loop of reaction, especially if the man coming in complaining of chest is about to have a heart attack, and the woman c…
/r/MensRights13/11/24 07:42 AM
2

10-20 years Its creator named it in 2019, iirc. The online discourse began in 2017.
/r/MensRights13/11/24 07:29 AM
3

It's linked to each other, which is the real Intersectionality that Dr James Sidanious talked about in his book 'Social Dominance Theory'.
/r/MensRights12/11/24 12:50 PM
2

I was 5.
/r/EverydayMisandry12/11/24 12:37 PM
2

I hope you have or can find the right sort of support to heal from what's happened to you. I did. It was me. I was my support. Took 10 years, but I mastered it, and help other boys and men now.
/r/EverydayMisandry12/11/24 12:36 PM
7

Korea is pretty nuts in regards to this, and that is because their govt (and culture) is captured by corporate interests. You want to see what America will turn in to when Neo-Liberal capitalist industrialization, feminism, and corporate capture reach its end point? It's South Korea.
/r/MensRights12/11/24 10:16 AM
13

This isn’t really a place for men to vent, as seen in the rules. There really isn't anywhere else. Regardless, that is why I propose you be the change you want, especially if there is a concern you particular feel strongly for.
/r/MensRights12/11/24 09:14 AM
8

Bye, Felicia 👋
/r/MensRights12/11/24 07:57 AM
8

Just report them, man. Its another feminist troll.
/r/MensRights12/11/24 07:55 AM
12

White Feather Campaign. Shut up, pls. Another feminist troll.
/r/MensRights12/11/24 07:54 AM
6

How functioning are they if the people living under them don't like them? You are referring to the 4B nonsense, or to the low birthrate? , so Korea is an extreme even for East Asia. Which makes sense for nations without a functioning patriarchy, or where the destruction of gender roles is occurring. That said, Korean men are Passport Bros'ing it up, going to Vietnam, Philippines, Thailand for wives, with success.
/r/MensRights12/11/24 07:53 AM
16

I could agree with you, if that wasn't the sole thing you do here. That is why I said make a thread discussing an issue or concern, sub topic appropriate of course, that would like to discuss in a courteous and reasonable manner. As to your post, I do not tell men how to speak, unless they are factually wrong. A large problem with this website is that men in particular have no place to vent male focused issues without chiding. However, rather than promote the kind of sub culture you want, you sp…
/r/MensRights12/11/24 07:48 AM
23

Oh, so you are tone policing? How about you make a post about something you consider important to address, instead of policing male speech like a good Compromised Male?
/r/MensRights12/11/24 07:01 AM
28

Coming from someone who's entire history here is revolves around dismissing others, anything you say is hard to take seriously. Basic bish shitposter.
/r/MensRights12/11/24 06:41 AM
15

Ask N.O.W. (and every other feminist NGO) why they lobbied against women being added to Selective Service when it came up last year. Peddle your patriarchy theory nonsense somewhere else. You want equality? Enlist.
/r/MensRights12/11/24 06:36 AM
5

This is bog standard feminist prattle; you managed to minimize rape committed by women AND render male victims invisible. Ugh. You should have your internet history monitored.
/r/MensRights12/11/24 06:27 AM
15

Korea actually has functioning gender roles; it is an actual Patriarchy, just like most east Asian nations. Its American women who have problems with slotting in to other cultures that isnt filled with negative liberty.
/r/MensRights12/11/24 05:19 AM
2

Op, you are noticing the Social Contract and how only one part of it is being kept. The other part of it is how women, in general society, were expected to show respect and deference to all men in society, knowing those men they did not even know was still expected to put their life on the line for their safety.
/r/MensRights12/11/24 01:56 AM
7

Here is the fun part: no one cares except us. Not my gender studies professor, not my exes, not even me, until I was a grown man and realized something was stolen from me. Sometimes you need to validate yourself, by yourself.
/r/EverydayMisandry11/11/24 06:14 PM
6

Sexual ideation of children.
/r/EverydayMisandry11/11/24 05:42 PM
6

I know around a dozen men who were raped as boys by women. I am one of them. How many more do I need to know before I can make similar sweeping judgments like the woman in OP? Or be angry whenever I see someone downplay the abuse in our lives (which happens all the time and is socially acceptable)?
/r/EverydayMisandry11/11/24 05:35 PM
15

State sanctioned violence is a scary thing.
/r/EverydayMisandry11/11/24 03:32 PM
3

You are actually incorrect on one thing; white women have benefitted far more from Affirmative Action and dei initiatives than anyone else, to the tune of 90%. Black people are used as scapegoats because someone figured that was bait that was easy to swallow.
/r/MensRights11/11/24 01:46 AM
1

Do college graduates usually make more money than high school graduates?
/r/EverydayMisandry10/11/24 03:18 PM
9

That is a part of culturation. This is how you know there isn't a 'patriarchy', because the cornerstone of a patriarchy is the men having control of the children. If women control the children, you can, by definition of the word, not have a patriarchy, you have a matriarchy.
/r/EverydayMisandry10/11/24 03:09 PM
7

I'm not talking to you, son, I'm talking to everyone else. Compromised males are not worth my time, I'm speaking to men.
/r/MensRights10/11/24 01:52 PM
8

I'd agree, were accusations not weaponized against against men, and rape laws written specifically to exclude women. Would you believe this when you saw a woman on death row for raping a man? Or a boy? That school teacher you met at a PTA meeting because she raped the high school football player?
/r/MensRights10/11/24 01:51 PM
3

There was a Democrat who said in an interview, almost in these exact words, that the democratic party 'emasculates men'. I couldn't believe it.
/r/EverydayMisandry10/11/24 01:46 PM
8

Op is a perfect example of the kind of 'Compromised Male', 'Foot Soldier', or 'Opps' we need to.be wary of. His point is to dilute the message, derail the conversation, weaken resolve. The worst part is that I reckon he genuinely believes in what he is saying, because his mind is so captured by gynocratic interests that he thinks any focus on men, rather than women, is 'feels wrong'. There is little in regards to a well reasoned argument here, it is a feelings based plea based on his taught pede…
/r/MensRights10/11/24 01:37 PM
1

Glad you asked, OP. I have here an entire policy agenda, complete with stats, multiple studies and empirical evidence to support the policies spoken of, from family court reform to comprehensive reproductive health legislation for women and men, to education reform. https://newblackmasculinities.wordpress.com/2020/09/24/the-black-male-political-agenda-by-t-hasan-johnson-ph-d/
/r/MensRights09/11/24 07:08 AM
0

Yes, in the mid double digits these days. I've also been very good friend and mentor to clothed women, and have a well honed understanding of female psych and male pattern emotional labor. Talk to a pimp, you may learn some things.
/r/MensRights08/11/24 07:40 AM
2

The follow the channel 'Mr. Z' on YouTube. Used to work for the DNC in Florida, well versed on issues and has some very good insights.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/11/24 05:03 PM
1

Iirc, it has been changed for months before this. I recall posts being made about it.
/r/MensRights07/11/24 12:16 PM
1

They had their chance to this time around. Notice how they pointedly did not. There is a good reason for that, and it is related to the reason why most white men voted for Trump in the first place.
/r/MensRights07/11/24 12:14 PM
3

Record all of this, and take it to your state labor board as a Title IX violation. They are making your workplace unbearable due to your gender. Also, you are a black man; that means you are a free target because you aren't actually a man, much less worthy of respect.
/r/MensRights07/11/24 07:13 AM
1

Jill Stein on her Breakfast Club interview said the Green Party supports Reparations for ADOS people. That is exactly what I want, and the only presidential candidate in almost 40 years to say those words outloud. That is what I want, alongside some of the other things on their stumping block.
/r/MensRights07/11/24 06:51 AM
3

Did you see the speeches the Obamas made? Or Harris' 'Black Male Agenda'? It was already tried, and failed, to the point of driving away 20% of black men of voting age.
/r/MensRights07/11/24 06:31 AM
1

I agree. You know who did bring up Reparations? The Green Party, and they got my vote.
/r/MensRights07/11/24 06:29 AM
5

A lot on tiktok.
/r/MensRights07/11/24 06:28 AM
2

Violent backlash against men by unhinged people fueled by social media, similar to India and Myanmar.
/r/MensRights07/11/24 05:27 AM
2

Better to use modmail.
/r/MensRights07/11/24 04:32 AM
2

Should ask for a super thread.
/r/MensRights07/11/24 03:07 AM
3

Did you hear about the woman a few years ago out in San Diego that jumped out butt naked on to the freeway and started taking potshots at passing cars? I think your cavalier attitude will bite you; women are not inherently good beings, and they are shredding at the seams at an increasing rate.
/r/MensRights07/11/24 02:31 AM
1

I reckon soon, a woman is going to go to a place where men congregate and shoot it up. Protect yourself accordingly.
/r/MensRights07/11/24 02:19 AM
1

He's the white guys first blackpill nihilist. His message really boiled down to 'if you aren't rich, tall and successful, your life isn't worth living'. The fact he was being listened to by young white men terrified the social engineers; that he isn't dead is the most surprising thing that came from this.
/r/MensRights07/11/24 01:48 AM
4

Changed to what.
/r/MensRights07/11/24 01:42 AM
2

In the circles I run in, something we have been saying for a few years is 'One of these days, one of these girls is gonna crash out, go to the local barbershop, and air it out Supreme Gentlemen style'. I still think it will happen, more than ever. Keep your 'Power Tools' nearby, guys, I expect things to pop off sooner than later.
/r/MensRights07/11/24 01:36 AM
3

Is there a super thread?
/r/MensRights07/11/24 01:33 AM
3

The funniest part is that western media holds them up as some driving force in South Korea, whereas Koreans think they are nutcases not worth paying attention to. Makes you think, 'Why is such a thing so well received in western nations? Who is this being marketed to?'.
/r/EverydayMisandry07/11/24 01:21 AM
13

Naw, I'm quite happy to let white women eat this one, friend. They are the single largest voting bloc in the nation; white women decide elections far more often than not. This is what they wanted, and that is why I mock the white women on this website blaming men for what their 'sisters' did.
/r/EverydayMisandry07/11/24 01:19 AM
2

Its this insane, albeit fringe, radfem ideology out of South Korea. Its basic tenets are avoiding interacting with men in any fashion; if you ever saw the 🤏 meme, that is their handiwork.
/r/EverydayMisandry07/11/24 01:15 AM
1

Dr. T. Get his book, man, it is a brilliant piece of literature!
/r/EverydayMisandry07/11/24 12:38 AM
2

Lines up with past trends. Hispanics, for example, have always voted 2/3rds Democrat, 1/3 Republican, +/-5% or so. Asian and others around the same.
/r/EverydayMisandry07/11/24 12:35 AM
8

Maybe it appears we “hate” women (we really don’t) because women hate us. Ding ding ding, there goes the projection alarm ⏰
/r/EverydayMisandry07/11/24 12:32 AM
9

44% of women voted for Trump. I reckon it was more if he won the popular vote.
/r/MensRights06/11/24 01:08 PM
6

I would love to see someone go to that sub and remind them that white women particularly voted for Trump in the majority every time he was at bat.
/r/MensRights06/11/24 01:06 PM
4

I'm waiting for the 'dusty ninja' rhetoric to explode. The Democrats outrageous shaming episodes and tactics used against black men was shocking to myself and all the black men I know, outside a few. Might make a post about it.
/r/MensRights06/11/24 01:03 PM
12

To wit, for the first time, a major party made a concerted, albeit moronic, effort to offer policy to black men in particular. That is evidence of a real change, one that can capitalized on. Baby steps, but still progress.
/r/EverydayMisandry06/11/24 12:50 PM
3

To wit, it happened once, and I roasted her over an open flame until the butter came out. I can't help what most women are; accept people at their level, and move appropriately. There was and is enough value in our marriage to make it worthwhile, for my sons at the very least, and being a 'boy mom' has put to test any preconceptions about male life.
/r/MensRights06/11/24 12:28 PM
3

And I did. My reply didn't go through, but it has changed for the better. Our sons taught her a valuable lesson in male vulnerability.
/r/MensRights06/11/24 12:27 PM
30

Yes, by my wife. Keep it to yourself, gentlemen. If you need to vent, vent to your boys.
/r/MensRights05/11/24 06:14 PM
7

it’s both misogynistic for men to do and misogynistic for you to bring up. You are also an evil bastard if you choose not to do it, as well, because men must perform their gender roles.
/r/EverydayMisandry05/11/24 03:22 PM
2

Affirmative Action was created for Black men to replace the lack of GI Bill and economic suppression by govt authorities. It was hijacked by white feminist women who were afraid the 'coloreds' would have access or privileges they wouldn't have.
/r/MensRights05/11/24 02:35 PM
13

Op, look for the book ,'Dream Hoarders'. It may be apropos.
/r/MensRights05/11/24 02:27 PM
2

I said privilege. Wealth has always been the main determinant of what privileges you can express, until you start getting in to entitlements and negative liberties. If you want to talk legal rights, at least in say, America, rights always came with responsibilities to serve others/community. A classic example is debt, and women not being able to take out loans. Women could not take loans because women legally could not be held responsible for any debts they incurred; their father or husband was …
/r/MensRights05/11/24 12:45 PM
3

Open up to your closest homeboys, not the womenfolk. Hell, I'm married, and am choosy about how and when I open up.
/r/MensRights05/11/24 09:19 AM
8

I agree, but we are both saying 'Look out for yourself, bro! Save yourself, bro!'. They don't care about you as a person, and they proved it to you. Take that information and use it to make your life better, not worse.
/r/MensRights05/11/24 09:10 AM
29

His point, friend, is that they think whatever can happen to them is worse than whatever happened to you, such that you do not need empathy, compassion, or even kindness. What they arent going to say is 'you are a fucking scrote, how dare you think you have any value, or that anything you experience holds a candle to my experiences!'. To wit, empathy is a learned trait, not an inherent one. You are seeing what happens when people are socialized to not empathize with certain groups of people.
/r/MensRights05/11/24 08:24 AM
2

Solely owning 40% of all slaves, for one. The idea that even elite women were 'victims' of some sort is historical revisionism. The wife of George Washington, Ms. Martha, was one of the largest single land owners in the nation at her time. Going to ignore how the argument always devolves in to hard power and Apex Fallacy, and ignores the kind of soft power women have had, and exercised, since at least the Greeks wrote of it.
/r/MensRights05/11/24 07:10 AM
5

Said no one on this sub. Can you get on topic, and keep your American sports team cheering for appropriate subs?
/r/EverydayMisandry05/11/24 06:38 AM
2

The elite class includes women and always has, so attempting to play this off on men solely is historically and temporally false.
/r/MensRights04/11/24 10:11 PM
8

Dr. James Sidanious' Social Dominance Theory strikes again; it states that in in-group/out-group conflicts, men receive the most, and most severe, actions against them. Women are co-opted by the dominant male group.
/r/EverydayMisandry16/10/24 03:07 AM
45

she’s attracted to the idea of the man What was that about being objectified, again?
/r/EverydayMisandry16/10/24 03:03 AM
6

You are the exception among men, not the norm.
/r/EverydayMisandry16/10/24 02:53 AM
2

uncomfortable Its tired, not uncomfortable. I hold to the opinion that 'feminism' and 'feminists' have exactly nothing to do with this sub or its goals, until the previous parties force themselves in, either with policy pursuits to the detriment of men and boys, or coming here to ask us how we feel about it. Its little different than a socialist coming here asking us what we think of them. It doesn't mean anything in terms of advocacy, it is a different group with little overlap, unless socialis…
/r/MensRights14/10/24 11:38 AM
6

You have gotten more actual response from a place of sound dialogue than you could expect from most places where you actively label yourself a part of the 'opposition'. 2 dozen or more well written posts answering your rather lengthy questionnaire is more than enough to establish a baseline, and as it stands, this sub does run the gamut when it comes to opinions on feminism, from people here who claim the feminist label (there are some) all the way to devout anti-feminists. The actual crank isn'…
/r/MensRights13/10/24 11:57 AM
6

Oooh, he said it out loud. The book 'Miseducated Negro' was all about this.
/r/MensRights13/10/24 01:29 AM
8

'Partner' is LGBTQ language, based on 'gender roles', rather than 'sex roles'. I told my wife flatly 'I am not your partner, I'm your HUSBAND. Call me what I am'.
/r/MensRights13/10/24 12:54 AM
2

Feminism is currently the premier Neo-Liberal, hyper capitalist, consumerist, classist movement. It has always been about elite white women accruing wealth, power and status to place themselves equal to elite white men in order to oppress and grind down everyone else. Calling it left wing (or right wing) displays a fundamental misunderstanding of what the ideology is.
/r/EverydayMisandry12/10/24 09:20 PM
11

Cursory research on criminal behavior talks about how most crime is based on convenience and low risk. An accusation made for gain or profit (Roda Osmond comes to mind) is something you should be able to defend yourself against. You are offering a level of benevolence, or one could say naivety, for criminals.
/r/MensRights12/10/24 03:13 PM
13

It is clear women, as a whole, given exceptions because NAW, are very much invested in monitoring social situations, status, and people both famous and not. The problem with your statement is that it ignores that a random woman can leverage the state against any man virtually free of consequences in a manner few, if any men, can conceivably comprehend.
/r/MensRights12/10/24 03:05 PM
0

Yes, people storming and looting Capitol Hill are exercising 'freedom of assembly'. Unfortunately, these weren't white liberal teenagers shouting 'Black lives matter!' for you to understand.
/r/MensRights11/10/24 03:38 PM
-2

Gonna miss the other 4? Or the woman that took one in the neck and bled out on her traitor friends? I said that they should have unleashed real Americans Freedom on a pack of traitors, and I mean it. Genetic Immunity isn't bulletproof, but a lot of people on this sub wish it was. There was a chance to send a message to the many Confederate cosplayers and would-be traitors in America that the punishment for taking arms against our nation is the biggest boot this side of Iraq, but alas, you had a …
/r/MensRights11/10/24 11:10 AM
0

single motherhood You mean the policies passed by Nixon's administration?
/r/MensRights11/10/24 08:20 AM
-10

For the same reason Trump was impeached for his part in a deadly attack on Capitol Hill, but not jailed the way he should have been. You are confusing political talking points for facts, now. People stormed fucking Congress with multiple fatalities. This kind of thing is fucking unheard of in 1st world nations. Those 'people' are blessed the Sergeant at Arms didn't open up the weapons locker, distribute rifles, and march the members of Congress out on a carpet of dead traitors, like we do in fuc…
/r/MensRights11/10/24 08:20 AM
0

I dunno, Google 'Get your booty to the poll' and 'No voting, No vucking'.
/r/MensRights11/10/24 08:15 AM
8

Well, at least before the guilty verdict came down. After that, there was talk about what her husband did to make her do it, the usual.
/r/EverydayMisandry11/10/24 06:18 AM
9

They did, iirc. We talked a lot about Susan Smith at the mosque when we talked about the social structure of America.
/r/EverydayMisandry11/10/24 04:53 AM
9

A guy I was listening to said 'Women have been freed unto madness, and with that freedom, comes the freedom to fail without anyone to blame but yourself'.
/r/MensRights09/10/24 09:22 AM
1

It is political theater, just like the immigration nonsense that both parties are tacitly in approval of generally, because the reasons behind it.
/r/MensRights09/10/24 09:19 AM
3

Most curfew laws get struck down anyway for being Unconstitutional in the first place. All those curfew laws for children made in the 80s and 90s were struck down in the 00s.
/r/MensRights09/10/24 07:03 AM
7

No one in Trump's camp has endorsed Project 2025, which is a decades old set of policy plans that has been around since before Reagan took office. In fact, it actually recycles a fair few Confederate era arguments about the supremacy of the State over Federal gov't, and iirc, one of its arguments dates back to the Federalist Papers. This has been a Democrat stumping point because there isn't a lot of new ammo to use, but it is a lot of nothingburger. For any of it to get by, it would need to get…
/r/MensRights09/10/24 07:01 AM
7

Thank you for giving voice to those gone too soon, but not forgotten 🙏
/r/MensRights09/10/24 06:47 AM
9

That moment when your father goes from giving you hugs to shaking your hand; something quiet and precious is gone forever, and you don't even know it. I realized something was different when I noticed women shrinking away from me in elevators, or giving me a wide berth on the sidewalk. I was 13. I had no idea why. Then my dad pulled me aside for 'The Talk'. A lot of things made more sense, and as a father myself, I understand why he did some of the things he did, even if it hurt. He was preparin…
/r/MensRights09/10/24 06:19 AM
1

You are now playing Russian Roulette with a stranger. This is almost word for word the same statement I've heard feminists say about men. It leads to myopia. You can't stop someone from being a criminal, only take measures to protect yourself.
/r/MensRights08/10/24 07:59 AM
2

Stop coping, start excelling for your own sake.
/r/MensRights08/10/24 07:50 AM
4

I think the state would enforce some distribution of your assets in her direction should the relationship end That depends on the state, in which case cursory knowledge of local law protects you, and need not be said. if she becomes pregnant Men must protect themselves, because she isn't there to protect YOU. The rest is a matter of vetting and caution. 'You should have chose better' applies to men and women equally.
/r/MensRights08/10/24 07:47 AM
7

First and probably the only one needed: a 30+ year old study with no recent corroborations means almost nothing.
/r/MensRights08/10/24 07:19 AM
9

Peonage, in the American parlance, would be akin to slavery. As for cohabitation, that depends on what the man is demanding for his labor, and whether he is getting it. Also, it is not enforced at the gun barrel of the state.
/r/MensRights08/10/24 06:15 AM
18

Comparing it to slavery is incredibly dishonest and fucking stupid. What else will you call being forced to labor for someone else, regardless of your will, at the threat of state violence?
/r/MensRights08/10/24 04:00 AM
13

What I've seen about 'mansplaining' is that it is the distilled difference in how men and women communicate. I mentor boys, do some light coaching for adults, and when dealing with women, if I speak to them the way I speak to men, I get accused of mansplaining. What I've noticed is that men will explain a concept from the bottom up, as though you know nothing about it, in order to cover all bases and make sure the fundamentals are in place. Women tend to explain things in a way that is less dire…
/r/EverydayMisandry03/10/24 06:50 AM
8

Read her book, friend. Its enlightening, and heartbreaking both.
/r/EverydayMisandry03/10/24 06:45 AM
1

Take as many ideas from this as needed. https://newblackmasculinities.wordpress.com/2020/09/24/the-black-male-political-agenda-by-t-hasan-johnson-ph-d/
/r/MensRights02/10/24 07:55 PM
0

Good day, sir.
/r/EverydayMisandry02/10/24 07:34 PM
1

I'm looking a post on this sub that is a good way to present studies. A long list, with access to the studies themselves. https://www.reddit.com/r/everydaymisandry/s/xnTvoBoOEA
/r/EverydayMisandry02/10/24 05:57 PM
2

Money can be gotten again This is so ignorant of economic realities as to be absurd. Kevin Samuels is laughing in heaven.
/r/MensRights02/10/24 05:49 PM
0

... you didn't read my post well. At no point did I talk about talking away abortion rights, that was you getting triggered and having an emotional outburst. I compared laws of other civilized, first world nations. This usually isn't a problem until ego and Eurocentrism kicks and you think the whites do it best. Beyond that, my comparison is pointing out how a different cultural framing creates very different, no less valid to their society set of laws that acknowledge all parties and provides r…
/r/EverydayMisandry02/10/24 05:46 PM
1

I already saw it, and outside your weak arguments, you advocate for built in inequality of the law, on top of baseless insults. I'll chose to forget you ever existed.
/r/EverydayMisandry02/10/24 05:38 PM
2

women who are victims of rape and incest can’t get abortions in some states You are comparing laws in a handful of states the the Supreme Court decision that shapes the law of the land, like Roe v Wade? That is dishonest, and you kmow it. And your numbers do not seem to include male victims, and is using the version of the so-called 'rape definition' that renders most male victims with no voice and no justice. On a goddamn pay walled article so I can't see where they drew their data or their met…
/r/EverydayMisandry02/10/24 05:35 PM
1

While I do not disagree, I think that is beside the point when it comes to the law.
/r/EverydayMisandry02/10/24 10:33 AM
-1

Neither of those are so prevalent as to be presented at the norm; they are edge cases. In fact, it actually makes your position worse, because Hermann v Seyer cleary marks out that the male has to be held responsible no matter the circumstances, including rape and incest. You just effectively proved my point about the inequality and oppression of the law. Thank you very much for your contribution to my argument.
/r/EverydayMisandry02/10/24 10:22 AM
0

You are using the framing that sex and pregnancy is something inflicted on the woman by the man, and that a man has no rights or say in his genetic contribution (not going to mention how you are assuming malevolence, or at least, negligence on part of the man). That is fine, if the laws around families reflected that top to bottom, and they do not. What I am advocating for is for family law to reflect the privilege you are presenting, and thus responsibility, you are placing on the mother. In th…
/r/EverydayMisandry02/10/24 10:11 AM
21

The system is the problem, because the system is wielded against men, and will be defended by those who profit from it. That is why family law still reflects patriarchal values that aren't in social operation anymore.
/r/MensRights02/10/24 06:16 AM
2

Op, Tender Years Doctine, feminist orthodoxy in the legal code, and vocal opposition to changing family law away from some of its patriarchal remnants when it gives advantages you would not give to 'equals'.
/r/EverydayMisandry02/10/24 05:57 AM
2

talk about framing immediately brings up framing I think you need to re-read my post, because the framing I brought up is why both Japan and South Korea require the father to sign off on an abortion, because he has a legally recognized contribution to the creation of children, and so has legal say in his offspring that is not superceded by other parties. That is actual equality under the law. Your framing disregards the father in having a say, or at least puts primacy in the mother; that is actu…
/r/EverydayMisandry02/10/24 05:55 AM
6

This is only really true due to the framing you were trained with and the law. You were trained that the man has no real actual contribution to speak of when it comes to the creation of life, and legally, a man has no right to his genetic material after ejaculation, unlike women who do have rights of ownership over their genetic material. Both of these tie in to the fact that legally and culturally, the father is no longer the steward of his children (which means de facto patriarchy is dead) in …
/r/EverydayMisandry02/10/24 05:28 AM
14

If someone who claims to be a part of a group starts advocating for genocide, I expect others in that group to publicly proclaim that they are not cosigning it, not quietly behind walls where others can't see them speak against the dogma. In this situation, to take a feminist statement, 'Silence is Complicity'. It's real quiet in here.
/r/EverydayMisandry01/10/24 06:13 AM
19

I have yet to see a 'moderate' condemn the 'extremists'. because they agree, the extremists are just saying the quiet part out loud
/r/EverydayMisandry01/10/24 04:11 AM
36

This is what happens when you believe that your gender is essentially benevolent.
/r/EverydayMisandry30/09/24 01:41 PM
2

What step is 'dehumanization' in the 10 steps to genocide? 3, iirc?
/r/EverydayMisandry28/09/24 01:25 PM
1

It does in the Middle East, Africa, most Eastern nations in general. The difference being, which is where a lot of the arguments come from others, this primacy is something that is bought and paid for with expectations on the men to perform duties to their community. It isn't free, it isn't easy, but the reward for a life of labor towards others is the respect of your society. That is what is missing in most western societies, the outward respect, given up front, towards men commensurate to the …
/r/EverydayMisandry28/09/24 05:29 AM
3

If you genderswapped the scenario, it may not be so extreme, but no way would the family be so accepting.
/r/EverydayMisandry26/09/24 12:26 AM
2

Written by someone who never saw or lived under an actual functional patriarchy, where the men has the legal and cultural support to lead and steward their families, and males are given primacy equal to their responsibilities.
/r/EverydayMisandry25/09/24 07:18 AM
2

To a point. Up until recently, everyone agreed, liberal and conservative, on the feminist school experiment. The book 'Beyond Title IX' talks about it. At least until it came out it doesn't work at all.
/r/MensRights25/09/24 06:49 AM
6

Not at all surprised about the age, especially if he is Afro-Latino. Black boys get 'adultified' going from age 9-10 or so, being seen as older, more dangerous, more threatening. That's why Tamir Rice was mistaken for a 18 year old from 30 feet away, despite being 12.
/r/MensRights25/09/24 06:04 AM
13

They are 'N-word, you don't belong here' scenarios. Been in most of them.
/r/EverydayMisandry25/09/24 04:12 AM
2

Watch the documentary about Pauli Murray, she has a large part to do with what you speak of.
/r/MensRights25/09/24 02:24 AM
7

basic rights Without the responsibilities men have to shoulder for equivalent 'basic rights'. That is the part a lot of people forget because you aren't taught that part of the history book.
/r/MensRights25/09/24 02:23 AM
15

This is peak projection; the social standard of a 'good man' is how well he serves others, particularly women.
/r/EverydayMisandry25/09/24 01:00 AM
2

Women of Color feminists are, for the most part, a radfem group that focuses on how awful black men are, and this has been their opinion since literally the end of slavery when they walked off the plantation. The opinion exists because doing so puts them closer to their White Womanhood aspirations; read bell hooks, Kimberly Crenshaw, and Pauli Murray, the grandmother of 2nd wave feminism for more material.
/r/MensRights24/09/24 06:37 AM
4

You would have to do the studies, and then formulate policy, almost from scratch. The sole paper I have ever heard of about boys being SA'd and how it affects them is 'She Touched Me', by Dr. Tommie Curry. It was rough reading, not the least reason because I have experienced it myself as a boy.
/r/MensRights24/09/24 04:34 AM
5

This is so true that it is a little frightening. I think women are the ones who think men are the disposable group, and so should be disposed of at their benefit. However, a woman has value, and that value must be recognized and lauded. Who was that white girl newscaster that said 'Value value' again?
/r/EverydayMisandry22/09/24 06:36 AM
1

As I said, absolutist. Cultural modes are generally one thing, and it is labeled as such. The only way this isn't true is if you apply the feminist definition of Patriarchy, which is some hyper oppressive monster like Jim Crow on gear. It's not, btw.
/r/MensRights22/09/24 04:25 AM
3

. if we define patriarchy as "a system and culture that oppresses women That is Patriarchy Theory, that nonsensical idea created by feminists that doesn't nor has ever existed. As for the rest, I think you need to actually look at the cultures I listed, and their social norms. I'm talking about a nation where it is considered rude for women to enter a door before a man, where in a mixed group outing, the women are expected to pour drinks for all of the men, where women can not get abortions with…
/r/MensRights22/09/24 04:16 AM
-2

Using the established cultural definition of 'Patriarchy', many eastern and Near East nations are still effective patriarchies, if not especially encoded in law, than in social and cultural norms. China, North/South Korea, Japan, Philippines, Thailand are all nations that offer primacy to the family father figure.
/r/MensRights21/09/24 01:55 PM
3

I've dealt with parents like this, especially fathers (I am one myself) and have seen similar behavior in women my entire life (men as well). Internally held beliefs, especially negative ones, that are suppressed or unacknowledged tend to burst out, like a tea kettle whistling. Its the strength of the interactions described that made me immediately think of my mother, the wife of my best friend, other women I have been close to. All of them were resentful of being women themselves, and because t…
/r/EverydayMisandry21/09/24 07:02 AM
2

Basic psychology and my work mentoring has let me see a lot. I could be wrong, but people are not that different.
/r/EverydayMisandry20/09/24 10:10 PM
2

I do believe there is some validity to the 'energy', insofar as acknowledging male and female essential natures. Where it gets twisted up is that it becomes an excuse for male servitude, when the women is supposed to serve the man, the man serves the family and community, if you want to look at the Divine Masculine/Feminine roles.
/r/MensRights20/09/24 01:08 AM
4

A fascinating amount of brigading in this thread, when you step back and look. Dozens of accounts posting that are either throwaways or have never posted here before. I wonder where this thread got linked to?
/r/MensRights18/09/24 07:58 PM
2

Can you summarize the video No. If you can not watch 2 videos about the Neo-Liberal order that America has been on since Reagan, with commentary from a 30 year geopolitical analyst, than the issue is you, not the information. If you need the basics, watch any and all interviews by John Joseph Mearsheimer, because my knowledge base isn't yours, and you need to catch up to something beyond American style right/left false dichotomies; they are two wings of the same bird, and have no actual differen…
/r/MensRights18/09/24 07:47 PM
27

They need a licensed clinician. This is absurdity writ large.
/r/EverydayMisandry18/09/24 12:18 PM
16

The best male approximate equivalent to abortion accesss is a vasectomy Sterilization is not equivalent to a fucking abortion, you outrageous rube. What you are talking about is parental disassociation. Men aren't entitled to control women's bodies. I'm sure you agree with me there In actual patriarchal nations, where men have rights to their genetic integrity (unlike so-called enlightened western nations), a woman can not get an abortion without the father signing off on it, because his genetic…
/r/MensRights18/09/24 06:46 AM
0

This is an entire video talking about different think tanks trying to tackle the worldwide 'laying flat' phenomenon. https://www.youtube.com/live/yuIfRjqTwHg?si=ktdiCiLDvIp5FN8E It's not confrontational, it is realist. I need to look out for my own at the end, and you are a competitor. It's relatively bloodless; you must come second place to me and mine.
/r/MensRights18/09/24 06:26 AM
3

I will take my lifetime of dating and interacting with black women. This is an entire video about BM/BW relationships, watch it starting from 15:00 https://www.youtube.com/live/3b-qjqhlKsQ?si=5uHslobTek0eEutT
/r/MensRights18/09/24 06:14 AM
8

This is where you out your face to the grind, get your passport, find the place you are appreciated.
/r/MenSupportMen18/09/24 05:50 AM
21

Women Are Wonderful strikes again!
/r/MensRights18/09/24 05:49 AM
13

I mean it is not as damaging, up to a point, for a man's rep as a woman's rep, in terms of social standing. In fact, what you said proves my point: you can't prove it, but if it really wasn't an issue, you would not see the need to lie about it.
/r/MensRights18/09/24 05:49 AM
1

A lot of men's lived experiences will disagree with you. I think you need to listen to the men speak, rather than gaslight them.
/r/MensRights18/09/24 04:56 AM
15

Body count is the only one I can think of out of hand. Maybe cheating, but that is hard to justify since women admit to cheating as much (maybe more) as men.
/r/MensRights18/09/24 04:12 AM
60

most men don't want the responsibility of taking care of their children. This is a feminist talking point; I suspected this was a plant account.
/r/MensRights18/09/24 04:09 AM
21

100% of the choice, means 100% of the responsibility. With 3 dozen forms of contraception and a 1st world education, there is little to no excuses you can make that will hold up, outside sheer irresponsibility. And it has to be that, because if a woman refused sex without protection, anything that is not acquiescence is a crime. 'No child is born in the west that wasn't the choice of the mother' rings true for a reason. In societies that are not so gynocratic, South Korea for example, both paren…
/r/MensRights18/09/24 03:45 AM
11

Men You mean the vast minority of men, in a legal system that gives 100% of choice and control to the women? What you are saying would make sense if the men had legal ownership of the children, like prior to the Tender Years Doctrine, but what you are proposing is making the people without the privilege, responsible for the ones with the privilege. This is unironically a misogynistic point, because it implies you think women are too incapable to steward their own bodies, so men need to do it for…
/r/MensRights18/09/24 03:31 AM
5

I would so badly have liked to know if that sentiment goes both ways It generally does not.
/r/MensRights18/09/24 03:27 AM
7

toxic yaoi fangirls can't respect boundaries I've seen this irl at anime conventions for years.
/r/EverydayMisandry18/09/24 02:52 AM
33

Of course its a black woman. My mother still wonders why my brother and I never married a black girl. Because, dear momma, just like you, most black women don't like black men, and can't vocalize it, but certainly act on it.
/r/MensRights17/09/24 09:26 AM
7

You do not get to tell men how to speak, or process their thoughts.
/r/EverydayMisandry17/09/24 03:57 AM
11

Technically, no, but as often seen, slurs are created by how they are used. The word 'Negro' was not a slur, for example.
/r/EverydayMisandry17/09/24 03:40 AM
8

Stop trying to police male spaces.
/r/EverydayMisandry17/09/24 03:38 AM
110

Genetic ownership. A man's sperm cells are not considered his bodily property after ejaculation. This is part of the argument that keeps 'spermjacking' legal.
/r/MensRights14/09/24 11:58 AM
-3

Every first world nation has given voting rights to women, women tend to vote left Explain how both Russia, China, and 2nd world African nations are having or encountering the same issues as Britain and America? Its called the environment. they have chosen to side with the state in exchange for changing our culture and rights to fit in with their incompatible ideals and redistribute the taxpayer dollar accordingly You know that British Patriarchy ended in 1839 with the Women and Infants Act, rig…
/r/MensRights14/09/24 08:22 AM
-1

more culture war nonsense Given that every 1st world nation is having the exact same problem, around the world, from America to Japan, making this a culture war issue, rather than a sociological one, tells me about your bad faith intentions. Yes, this is about you trying to pluck the 'white pride' string because you specifically reference the Muslims as 'enemies', when it is entirely beside the point. Just like how in America, they let in millions of Catholic, conservative, white adjacent immigr…
/r/MensRights14/09/24 07:49 AM
6

This has nothing to do with what you think. This is about making sure young men still buy in to the bullshit to continue producing for the state. They fear the growing 'Laying Flat' movement; this has fuckall to do with your nonsense culture war, and everything to do with MONEY. Muslims aren't on this because Muslims are going to work to produce for the state and have babies that will in turn become new worker bees, unlike your homegrown white women who insist on wiping themselves out because fe…
/r/MensRights14/09/24 07:03 AM
20

This means that - of deaths related to domestic violence murders (not even including suicides), 41.2% of them are male. This doesn't include Proxy Violence, or the top 3 ways women murder, all of whom can be disguised as accidents or suicide.
/r/EverydayMisandry13/09/24 05:49 PM
5

Op, Google 'Boule Gynocracy'. Now its your problem, too.
/r/EverydayMisandry13/09/24 01:24 PM
2

Most people aren't screaming their bigotry out loud, or cares enough. I do not think people, in general, are shitty.
/r/EverydayMisandry13/09/24 06:05 AM
3

what do you say to the people who think gay women aren’t more accepted than gay men they’re sexualized I would point to the long history of gay men being criminalized and murdered for being gay, which you do not see with lesbians, and the abundance of literature, explicit and not, about gay men, written by women, for the consumption of women. Men sexualize lesbians because they are women; women sexualize gay men because they are gay. Add to that, I'd look at how common it is for women in social …
/r/EverydayMisandry13/09/24 05:57 AM
1

Unless you grew up in an Islamic theocracy or certain parts of subsaharan africa you did not grow up under a patriarchy I would argue that point. Culturally, until very recently, much of South American and Asian nations were textbook patriarchies, albeit not in the same fashion as European cultures
/r/MensRights13/09/24 05:47 AM
3

Homophobia against women is rooted in misogyny I can not comment on that, as I have not seen any large amount of homophobia directed towards women, not even a third of what is directed towards men.
/r/EverydayMisandry13/09/24 05:14 AM
9

Imo, no. She is an entertainer making music the people she caters to wants for money. In this case, she played up already existing tropes that have been around since the 80s and 'Nothing going on but the rent'.
/r/EverydayMisandry13/09/24 04:33 AM
3

Gay men, because lesbians have never, in any culture I can think of, gotten the same amount of smoke as gay men.
/r/EverydayMisandry13/09/24 04:31 AM
6

This was in this sub, was it not?
/r/EverydayMisandry13/09/24 04:30 AM
3

Homophobia is an expression of misandry; you are attempting to subsume elements of the 'female role' (thus its privileges) when your job is to work and die. It ties in to Social Dominance Theory, in how in-group/out-group males interact, really.
/r/EverydayMisandry13/09/24 04:23 AM
8

They are an active threat, especially to children. These are the kind of people that need to be monitored by 3 letter agencies; future mass shooters.
/r/EverydayMisandry12/09/24 01:59 PM
5

Good luck, homie; I am more than a little familiar with your situation (my mother is a misandrist), so it can be a delicate situation.
/r/EverydayMisandry11/09/24 08:58 AM
6

To your sister, nothing, I do not engage with bigots of any stripe. To your dad, he is being negligent as a father, operating on past ideals where putting hands on a woman was out of the question for a man. What is going to happen is that she will find the right one, and either be on the losing end of a verbal sparring match, which I guarantee will result in her physically attacking the man, or that man will decide the day is her day, and slap the French toast out her mouth. Your dad, like most …
/r/EverydayMisandry11/09/24 08:01 AM
5

Dr. Curry goes in to heterophobia and phallophobia in The Man-Not. Your sister is projecting her internalized misogyny; she hates and resents her own nature as a woman. You see that with a lot of male feminist 'allies', and fairly often on the self help subs that trend towards men.
/r/EverydayMisandry11/09/24 07:46 AM
5

I would still recommend it, because it gives a lot of context to why feminism is what it is today, answers a fair few questions.
/r/MensRights10/09/24 07:05 AM
14

The perspective changes when you know who she is speaking of in particular; it is not a broad brush, and her regard for white men was as the dominant in-group males. Her idea of 'allyship' for white men was if white men married black women, which hooks considered 'real racism'. Black men were supposed to give up ideas of being 'patriarchs' to be better allies to black women on their march to get white husbands and ascend in social status equal to white women. This is why the words 'Gynocracy' an…
/r/MensRights10/09/24 06:54 AM
27

OP, you are missing something in particular. Unlike some feminists, bell hooks was writing in particular about black men, not all men as a whole, or even American men. That is why her passage about her father's death is so poignant and revealing about what her impetus for writing was. Everything she wrote was based on her daddy issues and hang-ups with black men, and she and Kimberly Crenshaw specifically referenced 1930s and 40s racist pseudoscience to support their arguments, while also ignori…
/r/MensRights10/09/24 06:37 AM
18

Racism very often is misandric in nature. Social Dominance Theory goes in to it very well. Men get the most lethal and outright forms of discrimination.
/r/MensRights07/09/24 05:18 PM
1

Read 'The Man-Not', then 'Social Dominance Theory'.
/r/MensRights07/09/24 03:53 PM
19

It's not a red herring for the Korean men, any more than the extreme misandry African American women show to African American men is a 'red herring'. You see who someone is.
/r/MensRights07/09/24 03:13 PM
17

is that they still expect men to adhere to traditional male gender roles like protecting women. Patriarchy by Feminist specifications: men provide and protect, but do not dare exercise any of the authority or leadership that comes with the responsibility of the above. Men Fund, Women Run.
/r/EverydayMisandry06/09/24 11:27 PM
4

Strange coincidence 🤔
/r/EverydayMisandry06/09/24 04:45 PM
4

I've seen and been in this, and what it came down to was how men explain concepts and women explain concepts tend to be different. The way I explain things (I do not know what you know and do not, so I will explain everything like you are a rookie) is readily understood by men, and considered condescending and 'mansplaining' by women. I actually managed to get a answer from my wife after a week of talking about the topic, and what it came down to was that she felt I was treating her like she was…
/r/MensRights06/09/24 05:09 AM
24

Little difference in actual practice. Its like police in a clearly marked cruiser, versus an undercover: its still a cop getting out.
/r/EverydayMisandry06/09/24 04:58 AM
40

The fun part is how it is a relatively recent bias. Before 1840, men were considered the primary caretaker and guardian of children. Women and Infants Act changed this legally, and 'somehow', social thought came about to reinforce the idea that women should be the ones who caretakers of children, and men shouldn't because of vague threats of danger.
/r/EverydayMisandry06/09/24 04:56 AM
1

This is about you dating, not legal rights. If you were married, it may be topical. Please delete this post, and repost it in the many relationship subs.
/r/MensRights06/09/24 03:09 AM
2

This is not a relationship sub, and never has been. This is a relationship question.
/r/MensRights06/09/24 02:36 AM
1

Off topic as hell. Why is this here?
/r/MensRights06/09/24 02:33 AM
13

Great actually, they get your last pennies before you die. All win.
/r/MensRights05/09/24 10:44 AM
1

Op, I compartmentalize parts of myself depending on who I am around, especially different social circles, of which are fairly broad and at times contradictory. The only place I get to be 'Me' is at home with my wife, and even that has limits because I also have to be 'The Husband' when she needs him. Part of most men's lot, no matter what you want, is that you will have to walk in shoes you don't know, but you can make the shoes yours and add depth to who you are, outside relatively bland labels…
/r/MenSupportMen05/09/24 07:49 AM
67

Single women spend more money and die earlier.
/r/MensRights05/09/24 07:43 AM
4

Words like this usually do not come out until a male they care for is crushed under the weight of the bridge they helped pile rocks on. It's too late for a lot of people; this kind of 'thoughtfulness' was needed 20-30 years ago.
/r/EverydayMisandry05/09/24 06:53 AM
1

If you read Pauli Murray and bell hooks, they are all white supremacists.
/r/EverydayMisandry05/09/24 06:21 AM
3

I once heard a teacher say that people needed to make sure that boys were taught not to hit girls back because the girls will hit the boys. Opened my eyes to how the gendered dynamic starts with the parents, especially the mother.
/r/EverydayMisandry05/09/24 06:19 AM
3

I believe the above was saying 'More women kill men, than men kill women'. I reckon there is IPV data folded in to this, especially when there has been talk about men dying sooner due to unreported abuse, and 'Proxy Violence', both of which go virtually unreported entirely.
/r/EverydayMisandry05/09/24 06:17 AM
1

This is a spam bot trying to sell products.
/r/MensRights05/09/24 06:03 AM
2

The border is open because they need to replace the babies white women aren't having due to a temper tantrum.
/r/MensRights05/09/24 04:08 AM
6

They want minority male votes. I think you need to actually talk to black men before you post about this. They do not 'want our votes', the expect our vote, without offering anything for it, and both parties have said so outright, multiple times, on the record. Hispanics and Asians tend to be evenly split between parties, often on age and gender lines, but that is usually ignored.
/r/MensRights05/09/24 04:06 AM
2

This is amusing, considering in the not too recent past, teaching was primarily a male dominated profession. Men were pushed out.
/r/MensRights05/09/24 04:02 AM
1

My assumption about such posts is to see how the OP responds to interactions before making any manner of judgment either way. Unless the post is nakedly inflammatory, reserve all judgments and respond on face of the text. You will find out quickly what its all about. Or apply 'Trust, but verify' universally.
/r/MensRights04/09/24 03:12 PM
4

I dont see how, when you look at what the policy has produced, or how Title VII and IX were captured.
/r/MensRights04/09/24 03:10 PM
1

You are making bad faith assumptions. See, you can judge someone based on their actions, not their initial posturing. You showed who you are after interacting, and I understand why others are avoiding you.
/r/MensRights04/09/24 12:11 PM
15

Feminism, especially 2nd Wave, is absolutely a Neo-Liberal Capitalist exercise that commodifies everything, especially men, and views success as a zero sum game. The end goal is to have women end up as the elite class.
/r/MensRights04/09/24 12:09 PM
18

That difference comes down to weapons versus fists. Before 1970, fatalities were about equal; in the black community until the 90s, women killed men more often in a number of years by a considerable margin.
/r/MensRights04/09/24 12:06 PM
2

That is an assumption of good faith that you can not really make here.
/r/MensRights04/09/24 12:01 PM
3

That would apply to real life, rarely to online interactions like reddit, with an administration that supports their points and suppresses the one espoused here.
/r/MensRights04/09/24 12:00 PM
10

I have heard multiple teachers, including my wife, openly say that girls are far more likely to engage in bad behavior, including violence (!) than boys in almost all grades.
/r/MensRights04/09/24 09:44 AM
6

I do not disagree with the heart of your post, but most of them are not here to listen, but to fingerwag like the last girl that was in here.
/r/MensRights04/09/24 09:41 AM
1

Hyena babble, from a proud hyena.
/r/EverydayMisandry04/09/24 09:39 AM
1

When men avoid women at work on this exact principle, with the power of the state and corporation behind her as well, the men are called sexist for it 🤣
/r/MensRights04/09/24 05:59 AM
2

Miss, I'm going to give you advice that will help, and the only one you need. Men are human beings, too You view men as threats, not as people, and consequently, you can not hear men speak when they talk about our lives. Your post was SIGN Language, moralizing and fingerwagging at the boys to be quiet and listen to women talk, even in a space for men. In your eyes, you are the real people, and we are the Neanderthals that need to be educated, or at least cowed so we don't Unga Bunga and hurt wom…
/r/MensRights04/09/24 05:56 AM
1

also know women are more likely to be victimized by men. According to what? This is that secondhand trauma again. women have been murdered for rejecting men. How often does that happen? i shared a personal experience that happened in the real world. Where nothing happened, outside you giving in to paranoia. You were not menaced, you were just afraid. Tbh, women like you scare the shit out of me, because you are the ones most likely to call the cops and cry 'this NEGRO is scaring me! 😭😭😭'.
/r/MensRights04/09/24 05:47 AM
3

fear comes from the fact that men can react in crazy and sometimes dangerous ways. So can women, and I have seen far more violently women in my life than violent men. What I have not done is live my life in fear of others, or live according to stereotypes. This is that 'secondhand trauma' coming out that I mentioned; I had figured I was right. it's good that's the worse you've seen, but it's definitely not the worst that happens. Miss, I've had worse happen to me directly. I've been slapped, spi…
/r/MensRights04/09/24 05:40 AM
5

You are not owed sympathy or understanding by anyone in the world. Miss, exactly how old are you, because all your posts scream 'I'm in high school'.
/r/MensRights04/09/24 05:35 AM
1

A democratic politician recently came right out and said the left emasculates men
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/09/24 05:33 AM
6

i also just felt awkward This is the important part. The issue isn't the man, it is you and your fear, your projection and catastrosizing. Its a form of neuroticism. To wit, this is another one of those things I've heard women say often, but despite being fairly outside in my years, the worst I have ever seen a man get is a handful of unpleasant words while walking away, which while indeed rude, is not threatening to a person with sense and self awareness. I'm more liable to believe that you hav…
/r/MensRights04/09/24 05:31 AM
1

One of the podcasts of regular joes talking life I watch, one of the fellows for years has said he is waiting for the news report of a woman gone off the deep end, influenced by things like reddit and podcasts I won't name, will go to their local barber shop with the 🔫🔫 and air it out.
/r/EverydayMisandry04/09/24 05:16 AM
4

Remember, this is what they are really like, and really are. Op should have done an admin report for each transphobic post. Enough of them would see the subreddit put on notice.
/r/EverydayMisandry04/09/24 05:09 AM
4

Not all feminists are misandrists That is debatable. You could credibly claim all feminists are racists, as well, if you actually do your reading about what feminist activists have done over the last 170 years. An ideological group is judged in what they say and do, bad actors included, not the ones you choose to acknowledge. See Strauss and 'One True Feminist'.
/r/EverydayMisandry04/09/24 05:08 AM
12

Empirical data has its place; a lot of men can support what is being described. The 'Pink Tax' applies only to a handful of items that have a male equivalent, but you it is far less widespread than people think. Op just vouched for the fact that women will indeed pay the price because they want it, even with cheaper alternatives.
/r/MensRights04/09/24 04:08 AM
7

with regards to white women blaming white men for all of society’s ills Read the Declaration of Sentiments, then watch the documentary about Pauli Murray. This has always been about elite white women getting power from elite white men, since the start.
/r/MensRights04/09/24 01:22 AM
1

I disagree with half your statement. A woman must remain in good physical and psychological health to have healthy children, and the premise is ONE (1) woman. The only actual realistic solution, since men are not mindless animals, is harvesting her eggs and going all in on artificial wombs, with some genetic selection for females. Given women are born with a full compliment of eggs, an infant could theoretically have her eggs harvested, and repeat the process. The first woman would be heralded a…
/r/MensRights03/09/24 06:22 AM
7

Hey, hey, they don't use 'gay', anymore! They use 'sassy' or 'zesty' instead 😑
/r/MensRights02/09/24 04:19 AM
1

Acceptance does not mean complacence. If you have the means to recognize structural issues, you can seek the means to change them. I think the fact you can recognize this as a structural issue is the step you need to seek how to remedy it. You have gained wisdom, if via unpleasantness, and can make sound choices now. We all need that moment to push ourselves out of comfort in to action.
/r/MensRights01/09/24 07:29 PM
17

You do not cope, you accept. A lot of people can and will do cruel things, great and small, both of us included. The whole 'redpill' thing is acceptance of how the world is, and choosing what you will do with your own freed will. In this situation, you are close enough to these young women to see all of their facets, not just the idealized ones you had in your mind. You have achieved clarity, and can now choose, with full knowledge, if you want to associate with them. Something like this would b…
/r/MensRights01/09/24 03:45 PM
1

I am quite sure this is a man behind the channel. Too much praise suspiciously close to 'you are one of the GOOD ones!'.
/r/MensRights01/09/24 03:22 PM
8

As someone who has been to such places, the answer is 'generally no'. There was even a big sign that said 'The employees do not engage in illegal activities!'. Then she grabbed the little big reverb, to which I replied something like 'Eh wut?!'.
/r/EverydayMisandry01/09/24 01:26 PM
1

My father was the same way, even when I looked him in the eye and told him he should divorce his wife. Sigh 😕
/r/MensRights01/09/24 12:45 PM
15

Apex Fallacy and solipsism hit like a truck.
/r/MensRights01/09/24 12:40 PM
21

Because they have to be willing to listen, and empathize. Otherwise, now you are just 'whining' and need to 'man up'. Most people, let alone women, do not want their comfortable self assurance challenged. I've been in OP's position where I have listened to women talk openly about some of the most scumbag shit they do to men, including sabotaging condoms. They had no sympathy or compassion specifically because their victims were 'dumb men'. See Cardi B, now apply it to 35% of the population.
/r/MensRights01/09/24 12:40 PM
10

I'll do you one better. That's how you know that that fear among women is irrational and is implanted by feminists against native male citizens to destabilize the nation. Feminists in the 1860s to 1900 explicitly used the threat of free Black men raping women, white AND black women, to argue that women needed to be franchised and empowered with the vote before black men. To paraphrase Sojourner Truth's 'Ain't I a Woman' speech, 'black men (she did not use those words), if given power, would be w…
/r/MensRights01/09/24 12:27 PM
2

multiple comments praising the Barbie Movie using Intersectionality without Dr Tommie Curry This is something I'd expect to see posted in men's lib.
/r/MensRights01/09/24 10:25 AM
6

not sure if he was dead before chainsaw woman arrived I hope he was.
/r/MensRights01/09/24 10:20 AM
13

Also, OP, read/watch 'Y, the Last Man'. Both the comic and the show were very frank about what it would mean to be the last man on earth. Hint: he ran for his fucking life from the one side that wanted to exploit him to death, and the other side that actually just wanted to kill him so they could say men were finally gone.... Oh shit, the women in your post are fucking projecting. They think that men would do to them, what the women would do to the man. Scary shit.
/r/MensRights01/09/24 10:17 AM
-7

brings up recent events for something that has been going on for 60 years Stop doing what feminists do and centering your current age gripes when dealing with historic trends.
/r/MensRights01/09/24 10:13 AM
10

Save the thread, and take screencaps. It is absolutely proof of why things are the way they are. To quote Ice Cube: Here's what they think about you.
/r/MensRights01/09/24 10:11 AM
3

Op, I really wonder if you want this conversation, especially from black men 😅 this is likely going to get ugly, then deleted, or just deleted out of hand for tenuous relation to the sub topic.
/r/MensRights01/09/24 07:35 AM
7

Dr. Tommie Curry's paper 'She Touched Me' goes in to how the average age of black boys first sexual experience, at the time, was ages 12-15. Black girls is 16-18.
/r/EverydayMisandry01/09/24 07:30 AM
8

Dr. Tommie Curry's paper 'She Touched Me' directly addresses this for the lie that it is.
/r/EverydayMisandry01/09/24 07:12 AM
8

35 for me. Still remember it.
/r/EverydayMisandry01/09/24 07:11 AM
2

Its not much overlap if you object to the core premise of the sub.
/r/MensRights01/09/24 06:59 AM
4

I'm not going to bother asking what invited such bitter acrimony Your projection. I asked why you are on a sub that does not interest you, and mentioned that if there is no place that serves your interest, why even be on reddit. Yes, I think it is an enormous waste of time being somewhere that doesn't align with your interests. You seem to be offended that your own actions are being 'critiqued', so I can imagine why your post was deleted.
/r/MensRights01/09/24 06:53 AM
4

Then you have nowhere, because this clearly isn't the place for you, either.
/r/MensRights01/09/24 06:03 AM
5

However, policy is the primary goal of this sub, hence the 'Rights' in 'Men's Rights'. If that is not part of your mission, why be at this sub, rather than others? There are other subs for general mens living and health that are not political.
/r/MensRights01/09/24 05:57 AM
3

She is projecting her own sense of superiority and dismissiveness towards others in this.
/r/EverydayMisandry01/09/24 05:56 AM
22

Its a commentary on the social landscape about masculinity, which gives support to the oft denied statement that it is masculinity itself that is considered problematic on its own. Your critique likely didn't stand on its own merits in regards to political activism. If you do not believe in political activism and policy as it regards to safeguarding the health and safety of boys and men, why are you here?
/r/MensRights01/09/24 05:54 AM
1

Or consider the very existence of Valerie Solinas “SCUM manifesto” - a piece that if gender swapped would result in public outcry The Manipulated Man has entered the chat 🤣
/r/MensRights30/08/24 12:39 PM
1

Black boys in America have the same literacy rates currently as black boys did in the 1940s. This is in a educational system controlled and operated by women, and informed by feminist policy. Boys are meat for the grinder, why would you care if they can't read when you fundamentally do not see them as human.
/r/MensRights30/08/24 12:37 PM
1

take issue with the suggestion that men need mentoring to get through the entirety of their lives, which is what it seems OP is referring to I did not see that anywhere in the post. Indeed, the point of both therapy and mentoring is that you eventually stop both, having learned what is needed and apply them to your life. If you have to continue either for lengthy periods without a diagnosis, you are being grifted. I do not adhere to silly presumptions of gender roles You mean sex roles, and many…
/r/MensRights30/08/24 12:26 PM
2

The issue with therapists is that many buy in to feminist rhetoric in an already strongly female coded profession. I watched that happen to my brother in marriage counseling.
/r/MensRights30/08/24 08:09 AM
1

I disagree, in as much as things clearly are not working well. I think you are confusing a mentor for someone who tells you to be like them, rather than advising you to follow your goals on your path, and help you on that path.
/r/MensRights30/08/24 08:07 AM
5

I could have guessed who ran the channel before I read the community tab.
/r/MensRights30/08/24 06:25 AM
1

Wikipedia, ironically, will speak about it.
/r/MensRights28/08/24 06:38 PM
11

I need not show compassion to someone who acts foolish in the face of wise counsel, and the problem with this statement is that it will end up gendered in practice. Men, protect your light from those who would grow tall by letting you burn yourself out.
/r/EverydayMisandry28/08/24 10:25 AM
9

Drizzle Drizzle, Grizzle Grizzle 🐻 Edit: hey man, been a while since I've seen you post!
/r/MenSupportMen28/08/24 06:40 AM
2

Shit, its a large body of feminist lit. Or do you mean about sex differences?
/r/MensRights28/08/24 06:29 AM
21

Feminist orthodox declares that any sex differences are entirely taught, and not inherent. It is a corner stone of Feminist philosophy, and the primary mover of policy. There is a growing body of evidence showing that this is incorrect.
/r/MensRights28/08/24 04:36 AM
1

Father's traditionally had ownership of the children; that is the 'Pater' part of Patriarchy. That changed with the British Women and Infants Act, which made children wards of the state, with the mother as the state's primary actor.
/r/MensRights28/08/24 04:34 AM
2

The actual story of the woman behind the movie 'How Stella Got Her Groove Back' was divorced by her Jamaican husband after he came out as gay. Passport Sis is a joke 🤣
/r/MensRights28/08/24 04:24 AM
-5

To wit, South Korea is indeed a patriarchal society, as are most Asian societies. I'd like know who is speaking in OP, because the 4B nutjobs do not represent any large group.
/r/MensRights28/08/24 02:58 AM
2

Just report and move on.
/r/MensRights28/08/24 02:40 AM
2

Your comment got autozapped by reddit. For what it is, look up British Common Law and alimony's evolution, and the purpose of dowries. The children stayed with the father, not the mother, until 1838 and the Women and Infants Act. Patriarchy, e.g. Rule of the Father, meant the the children classically were the property of the father, not the mother or the state. Miss, you are ill informed about family law, which is why I press you to do your reading.
/r/MensRights27/08/24 04:51 PM
3

Before the feminist movement, abused men usually would have had a way out financially and without social condemnation for leaving That is why spousal support and men supplying dowries have been a thing in many societies for centuries, to prevent exactly what you speak of. Miss, you need to do some historical reading, especially about family law over the centuries. In fact, alimony in particular came about to dissuade men from leaving their wives past their reproductive years, and if the man left…
/r/MensRights27/08/24 04:28 PM
2

You are confusing 'contentment', which has stable longevity, with 'happiness' which is inherently unstable, fleeting. What you are referencing was spoken of in the book 'Feminine Mystique', the Problem with No Name, ie myopic ennui from a stable existence. It is theorized to be why divorces skyrocketed after No Fault divorce became family law, with women overwhelmingly filing. Dissatisfaction with a life without surprises, uncertainty or chaos, which is laid at the feet of the man.
/r/MensRights27/08/24 04:25 PM
2

I saw it on the science sub maybe a month ago, ill see about digging it up. As for family and friends, that turns into dissonance; male family members aren't them, unless they are. You can find more than a few interviews where the women being asked the question if their fathers, brothers, sons are the men they speak so soundly negatively of, and the answer is usually a vehement 'no'. You will also see some women who will say, yes, they are, frighteningly enough.
/r/MensRights27/08/24 04:20 PM
3

how race has been weaponised against men I would then suggest picking up the book 'Social Dominance Theory' by Dr. James Sidanious, and the book 'The Man-Not' by Dr. Tommie Curry, currently of Edinburgh U.
/r/MensRights27/08/24 11:34 AM
1

That is an American norm. You can look at a variety of other cultures, and they do not treat each other the same way, and those cultures are not collapsing in on themselves the way America is.
/r/MensRights27/08/24 11:32 AM
25

Make it less punitive to be married, which means a complete overhaul of family court law. Better tax breaks for families, as well as stipends per child.
/r/MensRights27/08/24 07:59 AM
21

I think men and women both operated under a social contract where everyone knew what was required of them in a reciprocal, complimentary fashion. You 'got along' because everyone knew what the expectations were, and so long as you met them, it was 'good enough' to find contentment. I think that in the new era, women are taught to chase 'happiness', a fleeting concept, and men are taught to seek validation as human beings from women, and those are at odds with each other; women are not taught to …
/r/MensRights27/08/24 07:57 AM
6

Then you are just inept. Even better.
/r/MensRights27/08/24 06:31 AM
6

https://newblackmasculinities.wordpress.com/2020/09/24/the-black-male-political-agenda-by-t-hasan-johnson-ph-d/ This is among the most complete sources of issues facing men, black men in particular, and how policy can be leveraged to alleviate these issues, along with data to support each point. It was created by a host of academicians, lawyers, business men, from various political backgrounds, and, amusingly, the link is blacklisted on most websites recently. Unfortunately, there really is no o…
/r/MensRights27/08/24 04:24 AM
19

I disagree somewhat: I think most women in 1st world nations do not care about men's feelings, or much else of men at all, unless they are within their personal circle or notice. The reason for this is because of something recently demonstrated in studies that I think parents already knew: empathy is a learned trait, not an inherent one. You must be taught to have empathy and understanding of others in a particular fashion. Now how often to you see parents teaching their daughters to have explic…
/r/MensRights27/08/24 04:18 AM
18

Its not about having men that are sexually attractive to women (political lesbianism says hi), but to create a subservient labor class that will fund women's endeavors. I've heard it called 'Patriarchy by Feminist specifications'; men fund, women run. Men supply the labor and finances, but do not exercise any of the decision making authority over anyone, especially a woman. This is the next evolution of feminism, as Feminist policy makers and social planners are realizing that women do not want …
/r/MensRights27/08/24 04:08 AM
12

Feminism was created by and for the benefit of elite white women, at the expense of everyone who is not an elite white man. If you ever opened a history book, you would know this, but unfortunately, the ignorant can be taught. Read the Declaration of Sentiments, first.
/r/MensRights27/08/24 01:03 AM
9

I think you are just an inept, dishonest troll. Go back to inceltears.
/r/MensRights27/08/24 01:00 AM
1

The history of America doesn't support the claims you are making. In fact, the handful of exceptions you care to name prove the rule.
/r/EverydayMisandry26/08/24 11:27 AM
3

Start at the state level, not the national one. Reach out to your city representatives first, then state capital. Your scenario is no different than Kamala Harris using black people to thrust her campaign along, while also being on record as stating she will not address black community concerns in particular unless it 'helps everybody'. I also noticed that Facebook and Instagram is autoblocking websites that list black community political agendas and how current politicos could address them.
/r/MensRights25/08/24 02:05 PM
6

Do you actually think the academics and 'radical feminists' you speak dictate terms in society Yes, and they will say so themselves if you ask them. the ones calling the shots Said academicians want to be a part of the elite class. Your problem is that you consider them something different. Look at the boule gynocracy supporting Kamala Harris, for example. would the repeal of Roe v. Wade have ever been a thing? This betrays how ignorant you are; just as many women do not support abortion as do s…
/r/MensRights25/08/24 01:59 PM
10

Op, much of the policies you see are promoted and advised by women in academia, who follow very pronounced feminist trends. Warren Farrell said himself that when he brought up a variety to politicos, they told him to his face that they knew they were issues that needed addressing, but doing so would 'alienate the female voter base'. There is an assumption of charitability being made that has no factual or empirical grounding. You assume women would actively vote for policy that aided men in part…
/r/MensRights25/08/24 12:39 PM
5

Its difficult to account for 'black rights', since everyone got to eat off the Civil Rights Movement, including white women, for some reason. In fact, black male rights took a hit when race based Affirmative Action was struck down, but not gender based Affirmative Action, but I do not expect wealthy white women to bring that up, because they are the class feminism was created to support.
/r/EverydayMisandry25/08/24 04:31 AM
1

to shitpost Arguing implies you have cogent points.
/r/MensRights24/08/24 01:05 AM
19

The only group that actually enshrines abortion as a 'human right' is Judaism. Beyond that, you are entering a philosophical argument that often has little basis in facts, but how individuals feel.
/r/MensRights23/08/24 01:01 PM
4

Here is the secret: feminism was always about power, specifically in the hands of wealthy white women in order to stand beside wealthy white men, and stepping on anyone who got in the way. Read the Declaration of Sentiments, how the Suffragettes turned on the Abolitionists, and how white women became an oppressed class under Title VII and usurped Affirmative Action from black men.
/r/EverydayMisandry23/08/24 08:36 AM
2

On a fairly popular black talk show, one of the women said, 'I miss back when men would protect, provide, and shut up'. Others have said even worse. The sentiment that your duty as a man is to quietly work yourself to death for the sake of 'Queen Mother-Goddess' is very prevalent in the black community. It's also called 'Patriarchy by Feminist specifications', where you act as paymaster and guard dog, but exercise no authority or leadership 😉
/r/EverydayMisandry23/08/24 08:33 AM
1

You haven't brought up any issues, I'm simply calling out that everyone uses 'identity politics of some sort, whether or not you recognize them for what they are. I call it being honest with myself and what I see in the world, regardless if I like it or dislike it.
/r/MensRights23/08/24 04:27 AM
2

Identity politics is the primary tool of politicians Just because you like the identity politics, doesn't make them something different.
/r/MensRights23/08/24 04:21 AM
1

Look, young boy, you have no experiences to relate, and no particular history or desire to learn. Why are you even here, outside brigading and shitposting?
/r/MensRights23/08/24 04:06 AM
2

I wouldn't even say that much, as feminists actively want to be the oligarchal powers of society.
/r/MensRights22/08/24 04:49 PM
7

My heart to you, bro.
/r/EverydayMisandry21/08/24 08:50 PM
4

/#BlameJermaine
/r/EverydayMisandry21/08/24 08:50 PM
2

Ask the other 7 dead boys they found looking for him from the same river.
/r/MensRights21/08/24 08:21 PM
3

The Manipulated Man and S.C.U.M. Manifesto are from the same era of literature. Calling one 'needlessly hostile' while the other is required reading in some gender studies classes is rich. That said, I recommend it due to the point being that you should be looking for as much information as possible to chew over; be informed enough to craft your own opinion, rather than curating men's knowledge base to lead them on. To add to this list, I would recommend 'The Lucifer Principle', 'Social Dominanc…
/r/MensRights21/08/24 08:19 PM
2

I think you nailed it, but let me recontextualize the argument. 'Women are attracted to men with high status/power, but dislike how such men can, if they desire to, leverage that power against them in the way average men can not.' A man with power and status can curtail a woman's pursuit of negative liberty, and force said woman to live up to that man's approval and standards, further curbing her negative liberty. Joe on the street has no power to make any woman conform to his approval, and I re…
/r/MensRights21/08/24 07:55 PM
6

Most people in real life are not that honest unless you’re on a college campus
/r/EverydayMisandry21/08/24 07:32 PM
3

Black boys literacy rate for their grade is around 10%, the same as it was in the 1940s. Black women hold primary political power in the black community, and generally redirect any efforts for black boys towards black girls. My Brother's Keeper is a shining example, where it was resisted with calls of 'What about black girls?', despite the many programs devoted intra-communally towards black girls academic advancement. The reasons go back to plantation politics dating back to the 19th century, w…
/r/MensRights21/08/24 01:55 PM
1

All true, but I consider him a useful idiot. He is literally the first person I have ever heard pointedly say that programs to aid literacy rates for black boys are stonewalled primarily by black women, and his pedigree means he really can't be canceled for saying it outloud the way some black male academics and politicos have been for even hinting at that. What makes him dangerous is the money that is behind him. The Gates Foundation gave him 20 mil to continue his work, and while Reeves undoub…
/r/MensRights21/08/24 01:21 PM
2

In both India and Israel, for example, rendering laws against rape gender neutral was actively blocked by their respective feminist groups. The original push for the Equal Rights Amendment in America was blocked by feminists who realized it would strip women focused protections and privileges from the legal system, such as VAWA, gender based federal grants, loans, and housing, SSI, family court laws would have to be changed. Programs like My Brother's Keeper, began by President Obama, was active…
/r/MensRights21/08/24 01:16 PM
2

I had recently watched a review of the Chinese 'Laying Flat' movement, and I swear, all they needed to say was Drizzle Drizzle in Mandarin to fit right in. It was honestly hilarious, given how crazy dating culture in China is. It shows how it really is the environment that causes the strange conditioning.
/r/MensRights21/08/24 01:12 PM
0

And are getting pushback from multiple sources, like Brookings Institute via Dr. Reeves (supported by Melinda Gates). My primary concern is the foolish political sports team bs you find from so many here, and on the low low, that too many want revolution for some, status quo for others. I've seen my eldest son pass the line of when he stops being a cute lil boy to a 'Super Predator in Training', so the fight has reached a new level of real for me.
/r/MensRights21/08/24 09:25 AM
0

I disagree that they are not worth thought, because they are just as determined to shackle men back to the spokes as feminists and liberals are, albeit for different reasons.
/r/MensRights21/08/24 08:30 AM
7

I think the issue becomes whether or not you consider any primarily male space to be 'manosphere'. I know that MGTOW has long been a part of the manosphere, as well as the 'pill' philosophy and MRAs, but I had thought that incel spaces were their own sphere that had crossover with the PUA space, but not really within the overall male focused content, by choice. Further, I see a lack of real names in the Wikipedia article overall; it strikes as both sloppy and very white male focused, despite the…
/r/MensRights21/08/24 07:11 AM
6

They are still sipping the kool-aid.
/r/MensRights21/08/24 04:22 AM
29

After the last comic fiasco, I left the sub and muted it.
/r/EverydayMisandry21/08/24 04:00 AM
6

crashing feminists There is a reason for that, considering feminist NGOs are directly responsible for blocking legislation for stronger protection and efforts for struggling men and boys.
/r/MensRights21/08/24 02:56 AM
4

Rome? The Hittites? Asian societies in general? Unless you think 'patriarchy' is what feminists unironically think it is, there have been a number of cultures with 'Rule of the Father' as a social norm. Even the link you posted is about feminist 'Patriarchy Theory', which I already said is not what I am talking about. Its like watching someone incorrectly define feudalism and argue their erroneous definition is the correct one.
/r/MensRights20/08/24 05:04 PM
1

Op doesn't seem to remember how after Elliot Rogers, there was a huge scare about 'incel violence' and how dangerous they are to society. This has led to the current internet dislike of incels as a group, and why 'incel' has become a misandrist slur. You seem to be offended at someone postulating why the Incel Scare turned out to be nothing at all.
/r/ExRedPill20/08/24 12:41 PM
10

You should work on you, for yourself and your own edification.
/r/MenSupportMen20/08/24 10:44 AM
5

That doesn't mean that you should not demand tangibles in return for your vote. Difficulties does not mean surrendering.
/r/MensRights20/08/24 10:39 AM
97

Men should be voting their self-interest, just as women do. The problem is that none of the stage masters of the circus is platforming men's issues directly, if at all. Foolish 'sports team' ideals when voting is foolish. I would suggest men write in on their ballot the person who you want for the job, not the one they tell you to choose.
/r/MensRights20/08/24 07:53 AM
18

There is no discussion with people like this, as most bigots aren't prepared to listen to anything other than themselves and others like them.
/r/EverydayMisandry20/08/24 06:31 AM
6

Why are there people actually questioning if patriarchal societies existed? Do people not understand that 'Patriarchy the social and cultural mechanism' is not 'Patriarchy Theory as told in modern feminist philosophy'?
/r/MensRights20/08/24 04:48 AM
6

It's always Jermaine's fault 🤣
/r/MensRights20/08/24 04:42 AM
4

My doctor told it is 45, actually. You could ask your ob/gyn?
/r/MensRights20/08/24 04:40 AM
3

She's been pulling access to our money from me putting it in an account I can't access or see. This has been a more recent thing She knows what is up, OP. This is something really prevalent in black woman circles, their mothers tell them to have a 'getaway stash' of money 'in case he leaves'. Save the notes, get a lawyer asap, because it will get real bad, real fast.
/r/MenSupportMen20/08/24 04:35 AM
1

Your statement has no play, because the books haven't changed despite the situation you are speaking of not being the case for more than 60 years. Unless there is a bylaw that currently says women can not be psychologically examined, why are such diagnosis still based on, in your opinion, old, flawed data, when it could easily be updated?
/r/MensRights19/08/24 11:31 AM
57

Incel.
/r/MensRights19/08/24 11:25 AM
5

Social media allows for direct brain to text communication without the buffer of editors or pr teams to soften the vitriol.
/r/EverydayMisandry19/08/24 02:28 AM
2

I think the guy is mistaken, especially since both the American and Chinese govts see men checking out of their producer role as an issue of national security. The real end result should be a reckoning and restructuring. If you give men something for their sacrifice, they tend to do it willingly. Hi, Prussian school system.
/r/MensRights18/08/24 07:44 PM
7

Good question. Notice how despite all the cries of 'leftist' in the comments, when is the last time you saw core economic policy changes out of feminist thought? Its because they are not 'leftist', they are wannabe oligarchs that want to be the new lords of the system already in place, not change the system itself.
/r/MensRights18/08/24 04:04 PM
3

Male Emotional Labor in action.
/r/EverydayMisandry18/08/24 08:06 AM
1

Considering that a society lacking men will collapse, which is why Dr. Richard Reeves and Brookings Institute, a military think tank, are trying to stem the tide of men checking out of society. Men in society are the producer class for everyone else, at the bare minimum.
/r/MensRights18/08/24 07:57 AM
4

For black boys, iirc, the age is around 9yo. Tracks with my brother's and I experience, as well as my eldest son. Its going to get fun now.
/r/MensRights18/08/24 12:43 AM
1

The intent is to have a group of traditionally raised women for the men to pursue.
/r/MensRights18/08/24 12:04 AM
8

The govt is importing people to solve the baby problem. This plan was not well thought out.
/r/MensRights17/08/24 11:18 PM
2

Especially when they are lying 🤥
/r/EverydayMisandry14/08/24 06:11 AM
2

.... how are you slim and busty, but also 'androgynous'?
/r/EverydayMisandry13/08/24 07:35 AM
59

Reproductive coercion isn't topical?
/r/MensRights12/08/24 07:55 PM
1

Black men also don't claim BLM, a queen organization that used dead black men to grift millions from people. The actual grassroots organizers, all black men and fathers, that weren't liberal media shills somehow all ended up dead in house and car fires.
/r/MensRights11/08/24 04:35 AM
3

Yea, that's what a shotgun wedding was. You banged my daughter, now you will take care of her for life, or her family will kill you. Happened to one of my granduncles.
/r/MensRights10/08/24 03:32 PM
4

so he can avoid punishment. Are you sure about this? In the west, this was called 'shotgun weddings'.
/r/MensRights10/08/24 01:57 PM
1

Black pill is the red pill without morality or ethics applied. When Neo discovered that the prophesy was another control mechanism created by the Matrix to manipulate The One, and that the Matrix was crucial to the survival of humanity and needed to be saved, he became blackpill. Obama having to daily sign death warrants on men and women around the world to maintain American hegemony is blackpill. Truth, without morals.
/r/MensRights10/08/24 01:42 PM
4

I think too many people have not read the writings of the people who started applying these phrases to real life, and ask a lot of elementary questions. 'Who lied'? The better question is 'Why did they lie?', at least that leads to some food for thought. My favorites is the fools who go on about 'Blackpill is all about looks!'. Like goddammit, no, you idiot; there are irl politicians who call themselves 'blackpill', its not about looks.
/r/MensRights10/08/24 06:07 AM
9

You can see it on reddit all the time, even in this sub. I consider 'red pill' and 'black pill' to be philosophical lenses to view the world, but I can't count how many times I've seen people insist it is only about women.
/r/MensRights10/08/24 03:59 AM
6

A lot of people think 'red pill' is PUA only because of podcasts they watched (or heard of).
/r/MensRights10/08/24 03:56 AM
6

Males have the one thing women want more than anything else: freedom. Males are free to do whatever they want, however they want, with no restrictions at all. This is what feminists believe utterly. Negative liberty is what many women crave, and feminists think men have it. There is more to this, but I don't have the time to expand.
/r/MensRights10/08/24 03:48 AM
-1

They aren't going to hear you, remember who you are talking to.
/r/MensRights10/08/24 03:42 AM
15

We already have techno-feudalism/fascism.
/r/MensRights10/08/24 03:38 AM
12

Said it before I could. I tire of people who do not know what they are talking about, using words they do not know the definition of.
/r/MensRights10/08/24 03:37 AM
1

Op, your post is wildly off topic for the sub, and you are leading with your bitterness. Do yourself a favor, and delete the thread.
/r/MensRights10/08/24 03:35 AM
3

Why are you playing devils advocate for something you don't understand? That is just being contrary.
/r/MensRights10/08/24 03:30 AM
1

Rome wasn't a patriarchy?
/r/MensRights09/08/24 11:25 PM
-11

You are confusing 'Patriarchy Theory' with 'Patriarchy as a cultural practice'. There has indeed been many patriarchal cultures in the west, from the Hittites on forward, where the elder male or father figure (the patriarch) held command power over the family unit.
/r/MensRights08/08/24 08:09 AM
4

Op is a spam poster, or bot.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen08/08/24 08:06 AM
5

Read Dr. Anderson's 'Dark Ghetto', the book that prompted the Moynihan Report. The black community used marriage as a survival mechanism, which is why as soon as the men were not a dire necessity, they were cast off.
/r/MensRights08/08/24 03:14 AM
6

There was supposed to be an Amendment for exactly that. Feminists got it killed. RIP ERA.
/r/MensRights07/08/24 06:20 PM
10

You can, society clearly doesn't, which is why they get lesser criminal punishments across the board. I would love to see you push the kind of 'pull yourself up by your bootstraps' rhetoric on women the way men do 🤣 i would record it for posterity.
/r/MensRights07/08/24 05:10 PM
10

This is something outside your anecdotal experience; similar to the research about the preponderance of 'foodie calls', 'monkey branching' or backup guys was seen at a rate of some 50% of women. So if half of women polled say they actively have another man on the chain to jump to if/when their current relationship fails, what would you say?
/r/MensRights07/08/24 04:54 PM
11

Mothers create and maintain culture, but you can't actually hold women responsible for anything, and mothers even less.
/r/MensRights07/08/24 04:49 PM
4

There is a century of literature describing how the intersection of out-group status + male is a lethal combination, from W.E.B. DuBois, to Dr. Tommie Curry, to Dr. James Sidanious, to Dr. T. Hasan Johnson and Dr. Ronald Neal. Hell, the Kerner Commission talked about this 45 years ago, and Dr. Anderson's 'The Dark Ghetto' correctly predicted how it would metasticize to society at large, the 'niggerization of America'. What it really involves is something I do not expect to see, not from here, or…
/r/MensRights07/08/24 02:51 PM
1

BLM was a white liberal media propped up affair for a bunch of queen women to make money off the blood of dead black men. For some reason, white people keep bringing them up as an example of something other than a grift, but complete ignore the men like Darrell Seales who were the original creators of the grassroots protest movement. Too black, too male, too scary.
/r/MensRights07/08/24 02:43 PM
-13

Being upfront, the majority of posters here are American white men of various stripes. They are not our friends, we just happen to intersect on a double handful of political issues. They will cheerfully uphold the status quo that works for them. You may expect something better, but they are not it. We are on our own, as usual, and the faster you accept that, the better. SYSBM exists for a reason.
/r/MensRights07/08/24 02:40 PM
48

It's funny, because even the matriarchies we have on record... also had stable, long term mate pairings, because they encourage social stability for all involved. Marriage is about social foundation, not individual happiness or 'love'. That is new age thinking by people who never read a book.
/r/MensRights07/08/24 07:23 AM
2

This is good stuff, OP. I would love to see this posted in one of those inane 'purple pill' subs when they start belly aching about the 'pink tax'.
/r/MensRights07/08/24 05:12 AM
6

I remember thinking the story was sus from the start, just like brick lady. Not surprised.
/r/MensRights07/08/24 04:28 AM
2

They don't say 'gay' anymore, you homophobe! They say 'sassy' or 'zesty' 🙃
/r/MensRights07/08/24 04:23 AM
3

Most homophobia and transphobia is rooted in misandry.
/r/EverydayMisandry07/08/24 12:56 AM
2

The only way you could claim 'Neo-Socialist' is if you only listen to what feminists say, and do not look at the policies they promote. Everything, literally everything, behind and around feminism has been about accruing power and status for women solely, at the expense of everyone else except the most powerful men? Read the Declaration of Sentiments, where they outright say the point is to have elite white women share power with elite white men to guide the world to an enthno-utopia (paraphrase…
/r/MensRights05/08/24 07:54 PM
5

Bro, this shit started in the 90s, I've watched it get worse as time went on. I've had boys under 20 tell me they have never seen a male doctor in media, or a girl lose to a boy in anything. The only masculine role models you can find are... nothing in modern media. I have to present figures from the past for my sons, and I speak glowingly of my own father, rest his soul, to counteract the 'niggas ain't shit/deadbeat black father' narrative that surrounds them.
/r/MensRights05/08/24 07:05 PM
1

He didn't get to that part. The real answer is nothing; the honor of working to death for the state is enough, especially if they teach the boys that is what they should aspire to.
/r/MensRights05/08/24 06:57 PM
2

The world would turn in to Mad Max in 20 years tops.
/r/MensRights05/08/24 06:08 PM
1

Just like Richard Reeves wants. He recently was quoted as saying during an interview that men need to overproduce for the sake of the women they will not be with.
/r/MensRights05/08/24 06:06 PM
2

This is addressed in the 18 Point Black Male Political Agenda. A man would have 6 months from the date he is notified, by notarized office, of possible paternity to either contest it or sign off.on his rights (Financial Disassociation).
/r/MensRights05/08/24 06:03 PM
2

Proxy Violence, and the ways women go about it, is purposely ignored when these papers come out.
/r/MensRights05/08/24 05:51 PM
1

If you want neo-fuedalism, just say so, because that is what we are heading to.
/r/MensRights05/08/24 05:49 PM
0

woke No, it is Neo-Liberal and Classist, not 'woke'. That is a buzzword with no foundation comparable to what it used to mean in the 80s when it was created.
/r/MensRights05/08/24 05:40 PM
6

This is a deflection from observable reality that only serves to create an excuse. 51%+ is most, by definition. Outliers prove the majority, not disprove it. That you need to say its not all, means you must also admit it is most.
/r/MensRights05/08/24 05:38 PM
12

More important than you think, considering that this is about how your boys are being aculturated to see themselves. Sometimes this isn't about grown ups, and as another 40+ yo man with sons, I am mightily interested in the media propaganda they consume. My purpose being here is to make a better world for my kids, not bitch about not getting laid or psycho women in Twitter. I want laws being changed; in OP's situation, you had a woman who would actively be working with people using her skewed mi…
/r/MensRights05/08/24 05:27 PM
4

And we have brought up how stupid that is, and how Indian feminists blocked a bill to make rape gender neutral. These are the people you trust, btw.
/r/MensRights05/08/24 04:23 PM
5

not all males are white. There is a reason I say here, 'They are not your friend'. Equality in some areas, status quo in others.
/r/MensRights05/08/24 01:29 PM
7

They want to BE the rich and powerful to lord over others. They hunger for power and status; why would they try to bring down the tower they want to climb?
/r/MensRights02/08/24 12:15 AM
11

No need to apologize here.
/r/MensRights01/08/24 11:19 PM
11

All these different posts show you need to sit down with a licensed clinician, not reddit. This is an unhealthy obsession.
/r/MenSupportMen01/08/24 10:59 PM
1

Would I be banned? Yes. Ftfy. Go ahead and do it.
/r/MensRights01/08/24 02:50 PM
1

This is, for better or worse, what I think most black women believe.
/r/MensRights31/07/24 03:46 AM
1

Look who started the petition: Lexus Exodus, a known, wildly anti-black misandrist.
/r/MensRights31/07/24 03:44 AM
1

bell hooks.
/r/MensRights31/07/24 03:37 AM
9

Please, take this post to a feminist sub, and see how long it lasts.
/r/MensRights30/07/24 11:19 PM
1

We will know in 10 years or so what is the end result.
/r/MensRights30/07/24 07:22 PM
1

Not as worrying as you may think! There is a lot of talk about male advocacy in politics these days, more than ever, but it is very hush-hush because the feminist lobby is still very strong, and women are still the biggest voting bloc. Ironically, for male platforms to gain traction in to policy, women must support it hands down. I think you see what the problem is? 😅
/r/MensRights30/07/24 04:45 PM
2

In America, none that I can name out of hand, as they do it under the table. The politician that created the law that demands mandatory paternity testing was a man who, according the the creator of this male policy agenda https://newblackmasculinities.wordpress.com/2020/09/24/the-black-male-political-agenda-by-t-hasan-johnson-ph-d/ directly contacted him for his advice. Most male policy advocates are academics, like Reeves, Galloway, Curry, Johnson, Neal, that are referenced by politicos.
/r/MensRights30/07/24 01:16 PM
1

You haven't done your research, and need to play to extremes and the minority to make your points. You, and the mods, need to read more of the literature we have. I said 'cope' for a reason.
/r/EverydayMisandry28/07/24 04:24 PM
1

Op, you need to read 'The Man-Not' by Dr. Tommie Curry, and the writings of Dr. James Sidanious and Dr. T. Hasan Johnson. They go in at length about how racism, as it is practiced, is primarily a misandric affair designed to eliminate the men of the group and co-opt the women.
/r/MensRights27/07/24 04:11 PM
1

Exceptions prove rules, not disprove them. The Dating Divide is a publication about the study 2 women did about dating habits showing that racial hypergamy is a thing in practice, the third such I have seen. You are engaging in semantics and cope.
/r/EverydayMisandry27/07/24 03:39 PM
0

Goodbye and Godspeed.
/r/MensRights27/07/24 01:45 PM
0

You are continuing to weaponize your sexuality for brownie points, in a sub about men's rights, as though the topic somehow doesn't include you, or it matters. You seem unable to engage in rationality without flinging baseless accusations, so this is where this stops. Goodbye and Godspeed.
/r/MensRights27/07/24 01:23 PM
0

This is your homophobia talking. I am talking about what you can openly observe online and in academia. You can disagree, but it is so. You think that we have it so much better than you This is your emotions speaking. I am a bisexual man, I speak from acute experience in the scenario I am talking about. Your desire to be right fails in the face of the fact that I also occupy those same LGBTQ spaces, and have heard the talking abouts both within and without. Next time, don't rush to weaponize you…
/r/MensRights27/07/24 01:08 PM
1

The tattoos matter because of where they are placed, and how much clothing needs to come off to put the tattoo where it is. I do not consider them in and of themselves a red flag as some do.
/r/EverydayMisandry27/07/24 07:51 AM
4

whole white man hatred in Reddit You mean online, and its pure projection. I'm a fairly chocolate colored black man, and I know, beyond doubt, all girls want white peen, end of story. I haven't allowed that to stop my egomaniacal swagger, but I prefer honesty over good lies. The reason I asked you is because your race and nationality absolutely will affect who you deal with, and how they respond to you. How I would get treated by a black girl for saying 'XYZ' will he different than if a white du…
/r/EverydayMisandry27/07/24 07:05 AM
2

Sri Lankan Mmmm. How dark skinned are you? Can you pass the paper bag test?
/r/EverydayMisandry27/07/24 06:39 AM
3

2 questions I need to ask you is what is your ethnicity and nationality. That will change things up in ways both minor and major.
/r/EverydayMisandry27/07/24 05:55 AM
1

I think you are misinterpreting what OP said. I agree that the directed animosity is against heterosexual, cisgender men. That is not an assertion that gay or bisexual men don't catch it, as well, but it is noticeable that claiming LGBTQ status does indeed ward off immediate criticism from the people who regularly attack male spaces. The people who insult, belittle and degrade spaces such as this do so based on their feelings about males, primarily, heterosexuality secondary. This is why the ide…
/r/MensRights27/07/24 03:22 AM
1

It is, in fact, perfectly legal, as men do not have ownership over their genetic material the way women do.
/r/MensRights27/07/24 03:09 AM
2

The only thing you can really do is advocate for policy changes to patch up the holes in the legal process that encourage poor behavior. There are a handful of male focused political agendas out there.
/r/MensRights27/07/24 03:06 AM
6

My opinion is that most women don't actually want sex all that much. I disagree; I think women want different sex, chasing emotional thrills and excitement, novelty of experiences.
/r/MensRights27/07/24 03:01 AM
3

'Compromise?! braying hysterical laughter'
/r/MensRights26/07/24 05:03 AM
1

There is an interview, her final one iirc. It was haunting.
/r/MensRights26/07/24 05:02 AM
3

A lot of assertions and implications here, so I will challenge you to back them up.
/r/MensRights25/07/24 06:31 AM
1

Having read this, I don't believe it. Multiple times, it has been noted guys do not vocalize explicitly sexual commentary about women, tending to be subtle or roundabout, whilst women are known to be extremely explicitly. The idea of 'locker room talk' is projection, and that is what OP is showing. That said, I would ask what nationality OP is. Maybe, maybe I could see this in South America with children (Machismo culture can get odd), but even that is extending a lot of grace I am not ready to …
/r/EverydayMisandry23/07/24 08:47 PM
3

Took a look at the linked sub. You are right; they are more concerned with 'harmed women' than helping men.
/r/EverydayMisandry23/07/24 08:33 PM
8

Much of feminism's platitudes and philosophy is made of projecting women's mentality on to men, and using that as the cudgel to beat men with. Apply this to any conversation about violence, and remember that women engage in MORE IPV than men, across the board, and more child abuse and infanticide. Think of the 'man v bear' nonsense, and think of it from the pov of a woman who earnestly believes that men are as violent as the woman wants to be internally. Tell me that it doesn't make a lot more s…
/r/MensRights23/07/24 09:53 AM
8

Especially if you are predisposed to assuming the worst of a group based on specific traits. Sound familiar?
/r/MensRights23/07/24 04:30 AM
4

ideals of feminism It has been an elitist ideology for the structural power of white women since its inception, and has always relied on racist tropes. Read how feminism usurped Affirmative Action, for example.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/07/24 05:51 PM
5

Feminism, for a century and more, has supported, and at times elevated, racist rhetoric about men of color in order to pursue power gains for (white) women. I have a lot of reasons to take issue with Feminism, and I have yet to see any feminist of prominence make a public apology to black males especially for helping to create and maintain a lethal social environment for them.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/07/24 05:30 PM
1

'Patriarchy by Feminist specifications'.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/07/24 05:26 PM
4

It is an ADOS thing, which includes the Caribbean. It is really a social attitude descended from the plantation. It is also called the 'gynocracy' in some circles.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/07/24 05:23 PM
-1

I have little dog in this fight, but it stands to be pointed out that your 'analysis' falls well within the party line about what you are supposed to think when it comes to psychology as it is taught in university, and there is a credible argument being made that it is not serving all populations. People like Dr. Richard Reeves is getting millions of dollars to find out why it isn't working the way it should.
/r/MensRights22/07/24 05:17 PM
11

The sub you are speaking of has a very strict, 'no one gets to be a twat here' policy, and I think you should know why.
/r/EverydayMisandry22/07/24 02:33 PM
3

Op, this will never happen, and anyone who pays attention to geopolitics already knows why. There is a reason she straight up vanished from politics.
/r/MensRights21/07/24 03:11 PM
-1

Having read some of the thing, it rehashes a bunch of arguments dating back to the Confederacy, a lot of political moves Pres. Trump attempted and were blocked.by Congress, and would really succeed in creating a nouveau nobility out of the top 20% of family dynasties, while shutting out the 'poors'. It's a big nothingburger, again.
/r/MensRights19/07/24 04:32 AM
8

Dr. Curry in his book 'The Man-Not' makes a strong case for Androphobia/Heterophobia, in far better a way than I can manage.
/r/EverydayMisandry18/07/24 08:00 AM
-2

Anti-white racism The American white hegemony is fading fast (Google BRICS, petrol yuan), and, being blunt, the non-white (ie black males) have been turned in to such a boogeyman over the centuries that any social power change, even if it serves the cause of restorative justice, is considered an existential threat to the Caucasian masses. It is ultimately self-serving and fear based, easy ways to lead people by the nose as donkeys are. What OP is actually noticing is that there is both money and…
/r/EverydayMisandry18/07/24 07:59 AM
7

You cared enough to respond because I pointed out your racist, misandrist statements. Cope, seethe, mald, etc.
/r/MensRights18/07/24 05:05 AM
27

'Patriarchy by Feminist specifications', I've heard it called. Man funds, Woman runs, ie its about power and status.
/r/MensRights18/07/24 04:45 AM
14

launches in to a misandric rant in a thread about misandry Apropos.
/r/MensRights18/07/24 04:44 AM
1

I will offer pushback about Tate: he had nothing to do with men's uplifting in the slightest, or anything else. He was, I've eloquently described, 'White Boy's First First Nihilist'. His real message, if you listened, was a 1% elitist telling boys if they weren't rich, famous, and/or conventionally handsome, you have no value, and should kill yourself. There is a reason he vanishes for months and cut a deal to stfu. Pearl and Candace Owens is the conservative counterparts to the liberal's Reeve …
/r/EverydayMisandry16/07/24 03:25 AM
14

It depends on where you are, but short version as follows: Politically, write to your representatives about civil reforms. This sub focuses more on the legal issues at play, and the cold, hard truth is that nothing we speak of here will change unless a considerable percentage of women also support it. In every nation that has universal enfranchisement, women are the majority bloc of voters. Put your vote to power. Personally, and I do not mean to insult or belittle you, but this is how I've expl…
/r/MensRights14/07/24 07:59 PM
4

many boys fail to recognise that what's happening is abuse, and as a result are less inclined to report Exactly my experience.
/r/MensRights14/07/24 03:52 AM
6

This is why there's a campaign against male spaces of any sort. If the men start comparing notes (and they already are) and you find out that, no, you aren't crazy, things can change.
/r/MensRights14/07/24 01:15 AM
5

Interacting with other people is always work. Do you not have friends, either?
/r/MensRights13/07/24 08:35 AM
8

" I guess he did catch her outside." OOOOOOOOOHHHHHHHHG! 🤣🤣🤣🤣
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen13/07/24 07:17 AM
2

Who is spreading accusations on social media?
/r/MensRights12/07/24 05:54 AM
4

We have a lot of evidence otherwise.
/r/MensRights12/07/24 05:33 AM
5

Or put you in a situation where you can be taken advantage of by others.
/r/EverydayMisandry11/07/24 03:32 PM
5

I recall a podcast where a teacher said, straight out, that you need to teach boys not to hit back, because the girls will hit the boys. This aligns with some things I've heard from teachers recently about how the girls are more violent than the boys these days.
/r/EverydayMisandry11/07/24 04:39 AM
1

Honor Harrington.
/r/MensRights10/07/24 06:18 AM
4

Michael Jordan has entered the chat
/r/EverydayMisandry09/07/24 06:14 PM
3

Whew, a convicted murderer of multiple women, woman batterer, and rapist, that has taken tiktok thirst traps by storm. Google 'Wade Wilson thirst trap'.
/r/EverydayMisandry09/07/24 03:36 PM
1

Self awareness is sexy for a reason. If all you know is your own point of view, how can you see others?
/r/MensRights08/07/24 10:08 PM
27

Op, the entire conversation hinges on projection. In my experience, a lot of women tend to look at men as objects, be it sexually, financially, or successfully. I've found a lot of the arguments you see coming from the feminist factions make a lot of sense if you take what is being said and put it from a woman's perspective towards men. They truly believe we think the way they do, and we know, for the most part, we don't.
/r/MensRights08/07/24 05:33 PM
2

You think minorities like black people or queer people just gave up? It also took almost 150 years of effort. Change is usually slow.
/r/MensRights08/07/24 05:34 AM
11

Wade Wilson has entered the chat We know you would choose death.
/r/EverydayMisandry08/07/24 05:16 AM
1

Fire post, as usual.
/r/EverydayMisandry06/07/24 07:12 PM
7

At the very least, I’m glad they said the quiet part out loud. Ahem... let'em talk long enough Is now in full effect. That said, the 'fear' part was something that I first noticed when I was around 10 years old. It only snowballed as I got taller, more muscular, and my sardonic sneer improved with practice lolol. I've hard irl face to face talks about such topics as yours in years past, and it is actually fairly amazing how weak a lot of women think women are, or how readily they believe that so…
/r/EverydayMisandry06/07/24 07:16 AM
10

This whole bear thing really proved some things I had always suspected, and confirmed my theory that most women dehumanize men as a standard order of practice. Not mad about it, just will move accordingly, and I think a lot of other guys are, as well. Well, move only so much, I'm married with sons 😅
/r/EverydayMisandry06/07/24 05:52 AM
13

Then you know what time it is. For my part, I consider women like this to be personal threats to my safety for a handful of reasons, and insulate them from inner circle to minimize the harm they could do to me. Even then, I have a dim view of such misanthropes in general.
/r/EverydayMisandry06/07/24 05:28 AM
18

Who is this person to you, because they have let the mask slip in a serious way.
/r/EverydayMisandry06/07/24 05:18 AM
4

It has worked on reddit in the past, it can work again. Especially with fools like Dr. Richard Reeves getting more press (I have some scathing opinions of the man, useful idiot at best), a website with such nakedly vile opinions of males may find its own twist.
/r/EverydayMisandry06/07/24 04:45 AM
3

Women are the dominant voting bloc in almost every country where women as a group have access to the ballot box. You must appeal to women to remain in office.
/r/MensRights06/07/24 04:34 AM
5

In fairness, that entire scenario was pulled directly from the graphic novel.
/r/MensRights06/07/24 03:21 AM
11

Dr. Curry's paper 'She Touched Me' specifically noted that males and females react to sexual violation in the same manner, with the same trauma incurred.
/r/MensRights06/07/24 03:19 AM
10

Take the screenshots and email to various news orgs, see who bites. A fairly popular misandrist on YouTube was taken down after getting an entire article about her in Ars Technica.
/r/EverydayMisandry06/07/24 03:12 AM
2

The fact you have no capital letters I have come to believe this is either on purpose, unless they are on a desktop? Phones autocorrect such things.
/r/EverydayMisandry04/07/24 02:52 PM
6

Its the same as the 4B movement in South Korea, which is a relatively tiny group that gets a lot of western press. Controversy sells, and news media clutches to any controversy in the absence of greater ones.
/r/MensRights03/07/24 07:47 AM
5

If it was wrapped in to the package of the battery of blood tests babies already get, it would be a negligible cost. Childbirth costs 5k already, what is another $80?
/r/MensRights03/07/24 05:11 AM
5

Varies from $60-$100, depending on the lab and the extent of the testing.
/r/MensRights03/07/24 04:34 AM
3

My favorite blackpill quote applies here: individual effort will not overcome institutional inertia
/r/MensRights03/07/24 04:33 AM
1

If this is the comic I think it is, I blocked the poster and left the sub after I saw it. It was the last straw in an increasingly large number of misandrist 'comics' being posted.
/r/EverydayMisandry02/07/24 07:36 PM
3

One of those things is a law, the other is not.
/r/MensRights02/07/24 01:27 PM
29

You need to speak with a licensed clinician. This verges on the absurd; you have invented an issue to flagellate yourself with.
/r/MenSupportMen02/07/24 12:45 PM
1

I see this overwrought post, and not for a single moment do I think it was written for this sub, but for the reddit tone police and overlords. The question this brings is whether this sub is enforcing a NAWALT policy, and if it is, to be stated plainly so in the sub rules.
/r/EverydayMisandry30/06/24 02:02 AM
15

being more aggressive on average Also seem to exercise more control over that aggression.
/r/MensRights29/06/24 02:53 PM
11

That m/m couples are the lowest still has a lot of bearing.
/r/MensRights29/06/24 01:46 PM
4

I am wary of the women I encounter, I just don't wear it on my sleeve or talk about it out loud.
/r/EverydayMisandry28/06/24 02:54 PM
9

I didn't see any major feminists This is the 'no true Scotsman' argument that everyone knew you were making. Op didn't say 'feminist orgs, academics and ngos', but you want to make it about them, rather than people. That is why I said go to public feminist spaces, not NOW's project statement. It is funny how people here went super defensive and barked at me instead of providing any links Your posts, out of hand, are disingenuous, and everyone, myself included, knew it from the start. Would it sh…
/r/MensRights28/06/24 11:50 AM
2

I reckon a lot of people here owe you a thanks and a whiskey of your choice.
/r/MensRights28/06/24 11:32 AM
14

You are claiming to never have seen this sentiment before? If you haven't, that is odd, but alright, can work with that.
/r/MensRights28/06/24 08:57 AM
19

Trawl the feminist subs on reddit.
/r/MensRights28/06/24 07:36 AM
17

That is actually the argument used by the crowd that wants empirical evidence to be ignored.
/r/MensRights28/06/24 07:35 AM
7

You can't pay me (hurr) enough to believe this is an accident. For some reason, the money question never seems to come up, unless its comparing men and women (and economists have already said >30 women make more than >30 men across the board). Strange how all the social force isn't towards remedying the economic disparities between the super wealthy and everyone else.
/r/MensRights24/06/24 06:14 PM
6

Its generally what they want; they are projecting their anger and bitterness due to personal situations on to the group of men at large.
/r/MensRights24/06/24 05:25 PM
20

Wealth and status are more reliable markers of 'negative liberty' than gender, in any place you care to name. The poster talking about your lack of education and/or personal study is spot on. A narrative was told to you, and you never questioned it. Even then, that narrative is almost wholly based on Apex Fallacy, where only the highest status and positions to be found are the benchmark of 'equality'.
/r/MensRights24/06/24 05:24 PM
1

Op is speaking of the 'Sisterhood'. You see it in action in its most distilled form on social media.
/r/MensRights20/06/24 03:30 PM
5

You are pushing long debunked claims here, and then whining/gaslighting as need be.
/r/MensRights19/06/24 04:35 PM
10

white, cis men specifically Hahaha ha bell hooks has entered the chat Gloria Steinberg has entered the chat machismo has entered the chat east asian patriarchy has entered the chat Expand your social circles, all men get hit with this brush.
/r/EverydayMisandry19/06/24 04:06 AM
17

It serves a very fast marker for me, as whether or not the person reads the literature or is prepared to make their decisions based on reason rather than feelings. Its common enough that I keep it to myself, but I also put them in the box of 'I do not take your opinions too seriously', and move on.
/r/EverydayMisandry18/06/24 02:22 PM
7

The entirety of American lynching culture is a fantastic example, as well as past and current tendencies to utilize 'Proxy Violence' via law enforcement and/or male relatives and intimate partners. Emmitt Till remains a premier example, as Carolyn Bryant passed away recently, and didn't recant her accusation until literally being on her deathbed.
/r/MensRights18/06/24 02:46 AM
5

Men's feelings do not get millions of dollars in funding, get legislation passed,or get people killed via vigilante violence. At least in most western nations. Men and women in general care about women's feelings, and will act to assuage them. No one in particular cares about men's, as a group, feelings, or even that of boys.
/r/MensRights18/06/24 01:24 AM
23

In short, people don't care. It is that simple.
/r/EverydayMisandry16/06/24 01:17 PM
1

Klingons Watch out, next you'll start saying 'gynocracy' and I won't be able to contain my laughter.
/r/MensRights15/06/24 06:47 AM
5

Op, smaller sample size, but Dr. Curry's paper, 'She Touched Me', details how African American boys lose their viginity at the average age of 12-13, but African American girls lose their virginity at 16-17. It is a fairly open secret in the black community that adult women prey on pubescent boys very commonly.
/r/MensRights15/06/24 05:01 AM
5

Op, your topic really isn't in the wheelhouse of this sub, which deals more with legal situations, rather than interpersonal relationships.
/r/MensRights15/06/24 04:55 AM
1

I reckon so, as it is a male coded profession.
/r/MensRights15/06/24 04:50 AM
4

femalepessimism, I think.
/r/MensRights14/06/24 05:33 AM
9

Reddit counts it as 'doxxing', and this sub is always under scrutiny. Don't encourage things that will get the sub under the thumb.
/r/MensRights14/06/24 05:32 AM
1

Men are statistically less likely to be sexually assaulted compared to women This seems to depend on what sources you are using. Self reports by the CDC put the numbers as equal, except men report less and are less likely to have their claims investigated by police.
/r/MensRights13/06/24 04:53 PM
1

Alright, you disagree. Offer some proof to refute OP to continue a dialogue that can give context or educate. Studies get posted here all the time.
/r/MensRights13/06/24 06:06 AM
7

True, and my wife, and her friends, have husbands they trust, fathers and brothers they love, men who care for them. The 'male' isn't some creature wearing a human skin to them, we are human beings like they are. That's why I love this entire fiasco, it really represents the scope and scale of the misandry endemic to society, the staggering strength of male dehumanization. If I was a full psych researcher, I could make an entire paper about this because of what it says about sex relations.
/r/MensRights13/06/24 05:56 AM
1

Then you made an overblown disagreement that doesn't actually serve the discussion.
/r/MensRights13/06/24 05:53 AM
3

Bro, both of the parents are surgeons, the father died in the plane crash, and the son ends up at the mother's operating table. You typed before you thought, and have proven the thought experiment works as intended.
/r/MensRights13/06/24 05:14 AM
9

Op, there is a reason I have said before that the framing of the question allowed people to insert their own biases, and is actually a great 'Mask off' test for the women you know. My wife and her married friends all asked each other the man v bear question, and all except one chose a man. That tells me a lot.
/r/MensRights13/06/24 05:11 AM
3

Bye, Felicia 👋
/r/MensRights13/06/24 04:39 AM
3

I can't hear bigots prattling their bigotry, sorry. Now go back to 2x and screech.
/r/MensRights13/06/24 04:04 AM
8

2x poster The fact the mods do not ban you out of hand is a kindness. You proceed to ignore my statement about 'crime is location' and go on about national parks, which are vigorously patrolled by hundreds of armed woodsmen and have a list of rules to make sure that stupid people aren't killed by wild animals, and it still happens anyway despite their efforts. You clearly can not read statistics or research the data about crime, because then you would know that it is some 3% of the totality of m…
/r/MensRights12/06/24 06:52 PM
9

Because you are around men more often, and crime is based on location. If you were in the wilderness more often, you would see more attacks by wild animals, like you will in the Midwest. What I never said is that people (I used the word people for a reason) aren't violent, but the facts are very plain that it is the gross minority (single digit percentages of men and women) of people that commit violent acts, often repeatedly. If you actually look at criminal science, or the wealth of data and p…
/r/MensRights12/06/24 02:59 PM
12

Second, how is this "proven wrong We are living in a 1st world nation with competent civilian and federal policing, where with a Google search you can check to see rates of criminal activity in most areas in particular. Less than 5% of the American population are violent criminals if you include all varieties of such in one box with all of their victims (who are mostly men). If you want to break it down to individual crimes, the number gets smaller, like 1% of both men and women. It is a nonsens…
/r/MensRights12/06/24 02:34 PM
12

A person's feelings do not need to be acknowledged of they are expressly counterfactual. If they are provably wrong by every metric and measure we have, why does it bear noticing outside of changing those feelings to reflect reality?
/r/MensRights12/06/24 02:20 PM
12

That happens a lot. Then you hit them with the rest of the report that shows that it is women 😂
/r/MensRights12/06/24 02:15 PM
13

If you had dealt with wild animals, you would have more than this, which you admit is fantasizing, assumptions, and bias. Wild predators are fucking terrifying in a way that I think most people do not comprehend because most people do not deal with them directly. It means you can make these outrageous fantasies about what some man might do to you because the media puts such things front and center in your mind, versus what a wild predator is likely to do, to the point where you were taught from …
/r/MensRights12/06/24 02:14 PM
17

Are you saying that these are not analogous situations? No, they are not. You are comparing the capabilites of grown women, to children. I have more respect for women than to infantilize them so hard 🤣 Your average woman can absolutely be physically overpowered by your average man Fortunately we live in the not Stone Age era where there are many devices, easily carried in a pocket, that render gendered strength differences fairly moot. I have my CC license and carry regularly, despite being a 6'…
/r/MensRights12/06/24 01:59 PM
17

I think you need to read your own posts. You said 'children', and 'strangers'. Not 'adult women' and 'adult men'. Your posts have been extremely disingenuous and purposely losing the thread.
/r/MensRights12/06/24 01:44 PM
17

The scenario isn't positing that "all men" are bad Have you been looking at the responses that have been made to it? I have done psych profiling on neo nazis, and the language used is very similar to what they say about blacks, jews, immigrants. Very 'all of them are the same, all of them are insert derogatory for insert reasons that generally do not hold up to scrutiny'. The entire conversation is very emotional, and worded just enough to let people insert their own biases; I actually love how …
/r/MensRights12/06/24 01:33 PM
4

People here do not understand what the 'pill' ideas are, constantly confusing pick up artist rhetoric, MGTOW rhetoric, and basic bitch nihilism for the actual different 'pills', which are not ideologies, but philosophical lenses to view the world.
/r/MensRights11/06/24 03:51 AM
5

I've heard this called 'Son-husband'.
/r/MensRights11/06/24 03:36 AM
6

When someone tells you who they are, believe them. When a group of people tell you who they are, especially when they believe there are no repercussions, believe them.
/r/MensRights11/06/24 03:35 AM
1

There is nothing 'red pill' about misusing politico terms because of their emotional baggage, friend. That is purely American culture war nonsense.
/r/MensRights09/06/24 12:40 PM
1

Hey hey, now! Black women have made wonderful crash test dummies for the feminist oligarchy, as well as creating new theories to stea-, err, adopt!
/r/MensRights09/06/24 12:34 PM
1

Yes; I infact did so with my children.
/r/MensRights09/06/24 12:18 PM
2

I think they do know what they want, and it is what they have always strove for: Power, by any means or methods necessary, morality and ethics be damned. It would explain why feminists freely used racist rhetoric, eugenical rhetoric, sex positivity/negativity in equal measure, both hyper and hypo agency, socialist and capitalist theory, whatever was a prevailing thought of the day. It all makes much more sense when you stop looking at the rhetoric spoken, and look at the end result desired. Why …
/r/MensRights09/06/24 12:17 PM
3

Considering that Feminism began and ended as a tool of elites to gain yet more power, that isnt surprising. What is should be how enduring Feminism is, and how it has become so deeply embedded into the social fabric, from schools on. Read the book, 'Beyond Title VII', it is a fascinating reas.
/r/MensRights08/06/24 06:59 AM
3

Nixen, Carter, Ford etc were New dealers, not neoliberals. Yes, and Reagan ushered in Neo-Liberalism when the previous Socialist order collapsed with the Gold Standard. This doesn't explain why actual Marxist Feminism all but disappeared in the 90s along with the ERA and the Promise Keepers (the reason is that Marxist Feminists pushed for the ERA and mainstream feminists didn't want it) and its last vestiges is really in black radfem writings. Even then, Marxist Feminism didn't get any kind of p…
/r/MensRights08/06/24 06:54 AM
12

Yet they haven't managed to beat the patriarchal oppressors in the workforce Because the women that want to put in the work to do so is very few, compared to the number of idealistic, atavistic, conspicuous consumpters that want the power without the work or responsibility. What they actually want is what I have heard called 'Patriarchy by Feminist specifications', ie men fund, women run. Women gain the benefits of the patriarchal structure (order, protection, provision) while not being under th…
/r/MensRights08/06/24 06:46 AM
4

Neoliberalism is hyper capitalism Now tell me that Feminism has not always championed the acquisition of power, wealth and status commodities, specifically in the hands of women? Ask yourself why Feminism (specifically 2nd Wave) as a ideology did not take off until the USA adopted Neo-Liberalism as its primary economic model after the fall of the Gold Standard, after the primary goals of equalizing legal standards had been achieved? I think a lot of people make the gross mistake of looking at wh…
/r/MensRights08/06/24 06:42 AM
3

men are oppressors and women are the oppressed This became a thing in the 70s solely to get white women in to the Affirmative Action program, and did NOTexist in feminist thought in any real way beforehand. The YouTube channel Green Gorilla has an entire series about how feminism attached itself to any prevailing thought of the day to gain power and influence, including racism, eugenics, sex positivity, sex negativity, Communism, Capitalism, Socialism. That is why feminist thought is so schizoid…
/r/MensRights08/06/24 06:23 AM
2

It has become a thing you see because of American political culture war being adhoc'd in to everything. There was a branch of explicitly Marxist Feminism that came about in the 50s, but basically vanished from the sphere in the 90s, coinciding with the collapse of the Promise Keepers and the final death of the Equal Rights Amendment pursuit. This was not accidental, I suspect. There are no more active Marxist Feminists. What you see now is how feminism got its start: elite white women wanting eq…
/r/MensRights08/06/24 06:20 AM
4

I would call them what they are: Neo-Liberals. They are obsessed with monetary and social status gains, and have a long history of throwing other groups under the bus (Google Frederick Douglas Seneca Falls) in order to gain power.
/r/MensRights08/06/24 06:14 AM
10

Except Marxist Feminism fell out of vogue in the 90s and never really gained any prominence; the evidence of this is how feminists do not actively campaign against the post capitalist structure. They, in fact, want to be a part of it. That is why you hear so much talk about female CEOs, business leaders, politicians. They want to be a part of, if not the leaders of, the bourgeoisie/managerial class, not tear it down.
/r/MensRights08/06/24 06:11 AM
8

Its fear venting and trauma bonding. See the bear thing: its all about externalizing internal anxiety.
/r/EverydayMisandry06/06/24 02:02 AM
8

This woman is unironically perpetuating toxic femininity Made some adjustments.
/r/EverydayMisandry05/06/24 05:12 AM
19

Feminism has always, always been a racist, classist, elitist racket, created by elite white women to take power from elite white men while suppressing outgroup (everyone who was not white) men. If you actually read feminist writings, you would know this. Hell, there was a TV interview with the biggest feminist names in 1970 where they said straight out it was about gaining power, not equality, from their very own lips. People need to read. Edit: link to the interviews here https://www.reddit.com…
/r/EverydayMisandry05/06/24 04:46 AM
19

Tell that to the men that are run over with cars, stabbed and shot to death by their gfs and mothers, or call the goon squad on them for lies like the Acorn Corral cops
/r/EverydayMisandry05/06/24 04:44 AM
4

You can go further back than that. Google Frederick Douglas, Susan Anthony and Seneca Falls. In fact, the feminists of that era were the ones who propagated the 'violent Negro rapist' stereotype you see to this day.
/r/EverydayMisandry04/06/24 03:08 PM
13

Dr. Tommie Curry has a paper about this exact topic called 'She Touched Me'. I suggest everyone read it. My rapist as a child was an older woman, and I suspect my older brother had a similar experience.
/r/EverydayMisandry03/06/24 09:25 PM
6

OP, feminists have been saying this about 'men of color' since the 1840s. The entire movement has a well-documented history of both overt and covert racism and misandry, especially from the top names of the movement. This is not only typical, but should be expected.
/r/EverydayMisandry03/06/24 09:13 PM
1

While it may be a troll, their line of thinking meshes in perfectly with some very well known and popular feminist philosophy and literature. Given the variance of people, I see no reason to not take it at face value.
/r/EverydayMisandry03/06/24 01:22 PM
1

What is really important is where the study took place, what their test markers were, and test size. I agree with a poster above who said this was gaslighting; it is incredibly culture dependent.
/r/MensRights02/06/24 08:42 AM
2

I've been here longer than you've probably been alive. Friend, I'm a 40+ year old, married father of 2 young sons. I actively take part in the lives and growth of boys and young men irl. Any bona-fides you have are honestly pretty worthless to me. You still need to cite your sources for people who come to the sub and want to see that is a place of excellence not low brow misogyny. There are dozens of posts that do have their citations, as well as literature to reference. I will 0oint you to book…
/r/MensRights01/06/24 11:23 AM
6

... Doctor Mary P. Koss doesn't ring a bell? The domestic violence studies she headed? Are you new here?
/r/MensRights01/06/24 04:41 AM
2

Homophobia is misandry, by its very definition. What you are seeing is the effect of males erasure from the term 'Homophobia', forcing gay men into the position of 'Man-Not' in order to it to get traction. Your very post shows how if you lead with how gay men are still men, your empathy for them evaporates.
/r/EverydayMisandry31/05/24 05:48 AM
31

when are the feminists going to acknowledge this Never, because it ruins the grift. There is both money and social power that can be gained from the idea that men are monsters and women are brave survivors; they will never give it up until the costs outweigh the benefits.
/r/MensRights31/05/24 03:45 AM
1

how is it objectifying exactly Reducing a human being in to a walking atm with a dido attached is objectifying by definition. ur in the minority of men that actually thinks that way If you actually think that, it explains a lot. Your fundamental misunderstanding of who men are as human beings is depressingly common; we aren't people to you. Show your father these messages, and ask him what he thinks of your opinion of those like him.
/r/EverydayMisandry30/05/24 08:20 PM
6

Short version? No, not if a nation wants to retain its sovereignty. American men not doing their traditional duties is already considered a matter of national security.
/r/MensRights29/05/24 09:17 AM
2

Not every form of patriarchy is the same. African patriarchy != European patriarchy != Asian patriarchy. This is where feminists in particular get very game goofy and history ignorant, becoming unable to read books or use logical thinking.
/r/MensRights29/05/24 09:05 AM
2

You should edit that question in to your initial post, friend. As for that, another poster said that it is up in the air, as dead men tell no tales, and she apparently changed up often enough to not be taken at face value.
/r/EverydayMisandry29/05/24 04:32 AM
1

I thought it was OK for men to have emotions Liars are lying. As for generalities, I am entirely fine with them, so long as they can be supported outside of opinion. The not all argument gets real goofy because it is cherrypicked when it is not all. Shall I say not all men have testes? Some do not, after all. My issue stems from hyperbole and provably false statements being made, and when they are pushed back on for being false, the objection comes from dispelling the lie, not the lie being made…
/r/EverydayMisandry29/05/24 04:07 AM
1

What stuff?
/r/EverydayMisandry29/05/24 03:57 AM
1

The movie Poetic Justice says this almost verbatim.
/r/EverydayMisandry29/05/24 03:57 AM
2

She shouldn't have been executed In that, we must disagree. She was a habitual killer, and she would have done so again, doubtlessly. Some people are, for whatever reason, divorced from their essential humanity, and such people must be removed for the safety of everyone else.
/r/EverydayMisandry29/05/24 03:56 AM
1

How many serial killer are we encouraged to be empathetic to, besides this one?
/r/EverydayMisandry29/05/24 03:53 AM
1

Judges can ignore mandatory sentences whenever they want, and they do.
/r/MensRights27/05/24 11:52 AM
6

'Patriarchy bad, Gynocracy good' is the overarching message of Barbie.
/r/EverydayMisandry26/05/24 04:49 AM
3

https://youtu.be/qGABI6SCbiE?si=-Ng_hbUatXFOH2pJ The original, at least part of it. The other half is missing? Or I am blind. https://www.youtube.com/live/ocJ_82ESt6M?si=vyM7j96_Lujpw5cb https://www.youtube.com/live/n8RJPqWo0_w?si=S7Yw4N9TQhPnVo41 The entire interview with commentary from a black masculinist point of view.
/r/EverydayMisandry26/05/24 04:37 AM
3

I mean Neo-Liberalism, ie mass commercialization and judging everything, and everyone, by capitalist standards.
/r/EverydayMisandry26/05/24 03:21 AM
5

Patriarchy by Feminist specifications Men fund, Women run Feminism is a Neo-Liberal, capitalist venture. It is about accruing social, cultural and monetary power over men, and the feminists in the 70s said this explicitly (albeit paraphrased). There is an entire interview featuring the heads of various feminist orgs in the 70s in said so plainly, whereas today they lie. Edit: I can link the interview on YouTube for anyone who wants it, one with commentary, one without.
/r/EverydayMisandry26/05/24 03:12 AM
10

He was guilty of being loved by his father.
/r/MensRights25/05/24 06:58 AM
7

They want patriarchy by feminist specifications. Men fund, women run, men still protect while being left to fend for themselves.
/r/MensRights25/05/24 06:55 AM
1

This requires more insight than you are making. The reason elders are valued is because they can actively contribute wisdom and tradition to society, as well as filial piety. This is a fairly unique situation created by human society and culture, unless you can point me to a human society that actively purged their elders?
/r/MensRights25/05/24 04:26 AM
1

It is dehumanizing and objectifying in a way that would not be widely celebrated if this was applied to women. I have enough sense and human empathy to not boil women down to tits and ass because that is wrong. There are millions of women celebrating boiling men down to money, labor, and occasionally penis.
/r/EverydayMisandry24/05/24 01:05 PM
3

My wife did all of those things. She was a 'pick me', so I picked her. COBRA-LA-LA-LA-LA-LA-LA
/r/MensRights24/05/24 11:53 AM
2

A friend frequently comments.on his podcast: 'One of these days, one of these women is going to go to the local barbershop and air it out. The iccoculated hatred of men is that strong, and that open.'
/r/EverydayMisandry22/05/24 05:32 AM
13

A number of unpleasant things. Bowl of skittles, my friend 🤣
/r/MensRights21/05/24 03:06 PM
1

I'm going to say this again: HAPPINESS IS FLEETING! You can not 'stay' happy, you can only 'stay' content. The issue is a society that encourages women to chase happiness like a heroin addict chases their next hit, for similar reasons (someone is getting money).
/r/MensRights20/05/24 07:27 AM
1

Short version? Media, specifically Disney princesses. The Disney ceo admitted years ago to marketing 'lifestyle' to girls to make them better consumers, and that lifestyle was upper middle class to wealthy, with a provider husband, big house, luxury vehicle, and the children of her choosing.
/r/MensRights19/05/24 12:35 PM
1

Patriarchy by feminist specifications; men funds, women runs.
/r/MensRights19/05/24 08:22 AM
9

Its less 'end gender roles', its more 'decouple gender roles from the legal system'. Family court, Draft, and sentencing disparities are an excellent example of gender roles being enshrined in law, and feminists have actively campaigned to keep it that way.
/r/MensRights19/05/24 08:21 AM
3

i don’t think women want men to seriously be oppressed. Ahem: Sprinkle Sprinkle.
/r/EverydayMisandry17/05/24 04:17 PM
3

weird how men can never admit that y’all treat women like crap Because women do, too. It is a people and culture problem, not a man problem, like IPV and sexual assault. However, just like how neo nazis use the overpolicing, stereotyping and racial bias as evidence that Africans are inherently lesser humans, so do misandrists create justification for their prejudice, and get just as angry as actual nazis when you point out how they are mistaken 🤣 Your mistake, miss, was to attempt to use rap as …
/r/EverydayMisandry17/05/24 04:15 PM
40

School is the first place (hopefully) that boys learn society doesn't care about them. I can recall incidents from Kindergarten of being treated differently than girls who did the same thing, or even other boys.
/r/MensRights17/05/24 04:08 PM
3

This is the day we ignore the enormous amount of dehumanizing language regarding men, black men in particular, that has been a part of rap music since its inception, especially in songs sung by women 🤣🤣 We will also ignore the hundreds of songs praising mothers, grandmothers, daughters, wives, girlfriends, lost unrequited loves 🤣 But wait, there's more! We will then ignore the many, many women rappers who wrote and sang songs raunchier and more outrageous than all but the most gutter male rapper…
/r/EverydayMisandry17/05/24 03:45 PM
3

being any male teacher to young girls must feel like walking a mile high tight rope. I specifically chose to avoid teaching due to this.
/r/MensRights17/05/24 05:44 AM
7

When you view all men, especially black men, as violent predators, you see all kinds of problems.
/r/MensRights16/05/24 11:15 PM
5

There is a reason why 2nd wave feminism and Neo-Liberalism coincide with each other. Promote mass commercialism and capitalist views of society to the portion of society most vulnerable to 'lifestyle advertising' (thanks Disney for admitting this) and the conspicuous consumption that goes with it, as well as being the primary spending group. As a bonus, you get to weaken the bargaining power of the labor class, and increase elite worship/aspirationalism!
/r/MensRights16/05/24 05:33 AM
1

save Black women, as they’re the least likely to be chosen by white men Adjusted that statement. There is a lot of white male worship and white female envy in the black community, going back to the 19th century. There is a reason why 'Eve chose better, Serena chose better!' and 'about black male fetuses', along with derogatives like 'bullet bag' and 'naker' exist. Google 'Dr. Clarke Tangle of Pathology' and 'Myth of White Womanhood' for more reading.
/r/MensRights16/05/24 05:29 AM
2

Does that discount the validity of the comments? No one here is particularly surprised at violent people being violent, but those who excuse it.
/r/MensRights16/05/24 04:55 AM
1

Source then, because this isn't an uncommon thing to happen. Even then, the comments are from a content farm.
/r/MensRights16/05/24 03:39 AM
2

All he had to do was present a couple other men that said they also had sex with that 13 year old female before, or that she had sex with additional Adult and Teen males being promiscuous and thus a juvenile delinquent, and that she enticed the men.... And he was off the hook. No charges but a warning. What nation?
/r/MensRights15/05/24 03:48 AM
4

🔫 🔫 Always have been.
/r/MensRights15/05/24 03:43 AM
9

The latest Office for National Statistics figures (2022/23) show that one in three victims of domestic abuse are male equating to 751,000 men (3.2%) and 1.38 million women (5.7%). From this, 483,000 men and 964,000 women are victims of partner abuse. (ONS 2022/23)." It is surprisingly close but still women are more often the victims This is compared to a recent longitudinal study of all IPV studies of the last 60 years or so that put men and women evenly as abused, and women edge out men as abus…
/r/EverydayMisandry14/05/24 07:10 AM
14

You are talking about less than 2% of men in all 1st world nations. In most of them, it is less than 1%. Your post is patently untrue, by the data we have about criminality.
/r/EverydayMisandry14/05/24 04:54 AM
2

That is the true 'pro feminist' message.
/r/EverydayMisandry14/05/24 04:43 AM
1

This should have stopped after this post.
/r/MensRights12/05/24 12:24 PM
3

Impossible, feminism as we know it predates Marxism. What you are actually referring to is 'Victim Mentality/Woundology'. Its the same mentality that is fueling the man/bear nonsense: the idea that you must be a victim, because it gives you power over others via your demands for recompense.
/r/MensRights08/05/24 04:44 AM
10

Not sure how someone can be an amazing scientist without critical thinking. Rote training based on logic, versus emotional woundology/victimology. Not the same thing.
/r/MensRights07/05/24 12:17 PM
2

Its legally untrue. The simple fact that women could not be charged with rape because the law is pointlessly gendered, for example. A woman could rape a child and legally, it was scarcely assault. The fantasy that women were these downtrodden victims of all men everywhere is feminist historical revisionism.
/r/MensRights07/05/24 05:07 AM
11

Whoo boy, that could be a thread by itself. The short version is female competitive dynamics, long-standing race issues, and a massive difference in social power and standing. the brutal answer is that black women find the white man in power attractive, the white woman in power is a threat
/r/MensRights07/05/24 03:35 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter