TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

rgeek Archive

View 18 posts and 227 comments by rgeek on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
176

Feminismrgeek/r/MensRights14/07/15 10:00 PM
97

Generalrgeek/r/MensRights17/05/15 10:10 PM
76

Social Issuesrgeek/r/MensRights20/07/15 06:42 PM
35

Edu./Occu.rgeek/r/MensRights06/05/15 06:23 PM
35

Social Issuesrgeek/r/MensRights30/06/15 08:16 AM
29

Eastern Culturergeek/r/MensRights16/06/15 12:01 AM
23

Analysisrgeek/r/MensRights11/10/14 02:06 PM
19

Feminismrgeek/r/MensRights31/07/15 10:44 AM
18

Eastern Culturergeek/r/MensRights31/12/14 11:53 AM
18

Edu./Occu.rgeek/r/MensRights06/01/16 05:37 AM
13

Marriage/Divorcergeek/r/MensRights14/07/15 07:02 PM
13

False Accusationrgeek/r/MensRights02/06/15 11:27 AM
12

Questionrgeek/r/MensRights22/08/14 08:26 PM
12

Edu./Occu.rgeek/r/MensRights29/10/15 03:51 PM
2

Opinionrgeek/r/MensRights15/03/15 05:47 PM
2

rgeek/r/MensRights17/03/15 07:02 PM
1

Social Issuesrgeek/r/MensRights30/06/15 07:41 AM
1

rgeek/r/MensRights06/01/15 03:39 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
0

Is it something that just doesn't bother men? It bothers us that we can be drafted and women cant. But nothing can be done legally to abolish it. If the govt. decided to implement the draft, what can anyone do abt it, legally-speaking? The courts have declared in multiple cases that a draft is completely legal and violators have been punished. Nobody has come up with a working argument against the draft. You can become a draft-dodger, but your hope of returning to your home and family is depende…
/r/MensRights07/12/15 02:00 AM
19

there was one woman who broke the push-up AND pull-up record for the academy Do they keep separate records for men and women or is it gender-neutral, coz I find it hard to believe.
/r/MensRights03/12/15 06:47 PM
1

It was. https://www.reddit.com/r/rage/comments/3v6pnq/how_can_a_wife_be_so_heartless_after_simon_was/
/r/MensRights03/12/15 01:04 PM
-1

Does a troll not downvote the opposite party? Or say bye? Bye!!
/r/MensRights27/11/15 08:25 PM
-1

After you're done jerking your dick fantasising abt women being forced to prostitute themselves, could you explain your reasoning? There! Was my English good enough for you?
/r/MensRights27/11/15 08:18 PM
-1

Yes. Prostitution is always fun esp. the forced variety. I could have understood if women choose to be prostitutes but I dont understand why being forced to enter prostitution is a good idea, according to you.
/r/MensRights27/11/15 08:12 PM
0

That's a better argument. But we do know that mainstream feminists don't extend that to areas like prostitution. I haven't read any article, which said "male prostitutes should earn as much as female prostitutes" or "boys who are forced into prostitution are as important as girls who are forced into it" from them.
/r/MensRights27/11/15 08:03 PM
-2

Are you offended that men cant sell themselves as much or are you happy that women are forced to sell themselves to survive? Or was it that there wasn't a mention of men in the entire article? Or has access to prostitutes become a men's rights issue? This is not a laughing matter for you to title it in such a way.
/r/MensRights27/11/15 07:54 PM
0

What does this have to do with men's rights or feminism?
/r/MensRights27/11/15 07:26 PM
5

Read the italics.
/r/MensRights25/11/15 10:33 PM
8

I read the article you gave but claims in the article are not properly sourced. For example, In New Delhi last year, there were 635 rape cases brought to court, and only one resulted in a conviction. That’s a conviction rate of 0.16 per cent; in comparison, English-speaking countries typically have rape conviction rates of between 40 and 70 per cent. Delhi has a 24% conviction claim. The one-conviction-only claim has no source. I found a Huffingtonpost article making the same claim, which referr…
/r/MensRights25/11/15 10:11 PM
6

I was looking for objections, so could you please tell me where i am wrong? Also, I saw a hit-job (an opinion shared by most Indians) ala "The Hunting Ground", what did you see?
/r/MensRights25/11/15 08:46 PM
12

I dont get why this sub has a hard-on for India. I can understand other subs getting India wrong on rape (among other things) but I assumed this sub knows better, esp. since Indians keep posting various links detailing false allegations, false cases, misrepresentation of men etc here. The Indian community in the West is highly respected and yet these are the very same men, with similar cultural background to those in India. Do some research on rape statistics in India Indian rape stats cant be d…
/r/MensRights25/11/15 08:18 PM
5

Glad to see that false accusers may get exactly what they deserve. Atleast it's a start.
/r/MensRights24/11/15 04:58 PM
2

Well, that's because there is the prevalent definition and then there is the dictionary definition of feminism. The prevalent definition is what most people hold feminism to be i.e equality is a two-way street and feminists advocate for it. Then there is the dictionary definition. From wiki, Feminism is a range of movements and ideologies that share a common goal: to define, establish, and achieve equal political, economic, cultural, personal, and social rights for women You see it says "for wom…
/r/MensRights21/11/15 05:17 AM
1

Yet it was feminists who made sure women cannot be prosecuted for rape in India and Israel.
/r/MensRights13/11/15 01:34 AM
1

Nice story. Enjoyed reading it.
/r/MensRights03/11/15 02:58 PM
3

Well, that's because there is the prevalent definition and then there is the dictionary definition of feminism. The prevalent definition is what you held throughout your life (and your awesome moms by the way) i.e equality is a two-way street. Then there is the dictionary definition. From wiki, Feminism is a range of movements and ideologies that share a common goal: to define, establish, and achieve equal political, economic, cultural, personal, and social rights for women You see it says "for …
/r/MensRights06/08/15 09:51 PM
7

I should have said "nobody will have any problems with you posting that here". I didn't mean people here will unanimously agree with it i.e we are not a hive mind. There are liberals, conservatives, libertarians, communists etc i.e literally every part in the political spectrum is represented here. So its not unusual that some people are downvoting you. It seems though that, reading the comments, most people in this sub either agree with you or have moved on.
/r/MensRights06/08/15 09:00 PM
1

I dont think anybody will have any problem with this. Its well laid out and backed up with evidence. /r/mensrights isnt a safe space, where only certain opinions are allowed. Btw, I completely agree.
/r/MensRights06/08/15 06:34 PM
4

Its not rape and its not her fault she got pregnant. The fact is, she regularly played an innocent childish game of tag with the boy, and sometimes while playing, her clothes used to get caught in a bush. While trying to free herself, she sometimes exerted too much force, resulting in her clothes getting ripped off and her tripping and falling over the boy, whose clothes also got caught in the bush and was naked as well. Such incidents happened several times over 5 months, and in some of those i…
/r/MensRights06/08/15 04:35 PM
6

Just a coincidence but I was reading this yesterday https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sokal_affair
/r/MensRights31/07/15 06:25 AM
1

That's great /r/iamverysmart material. But OP, why you post such deep thoughts, which dumb men like us cant understand, here?
/r/MensRights22/07/15 09:18 AM
18

Mr. Murphy then suggested that what Mr. Elliott had been doing was defending himself, and his views, when he was being attacked on Twitter by her and the other complainants. Wasn’t he entitled to do that? “He’s entitled to defend himself to the world, Mr. Murphy; he’s not entitled to do it to me.” “No matter what you say about or to him?” Mr. Murphy asked. “Not to me,” she said. Thanks OP, for giving a damn good example of snowflake entitlement. Had a good laugh on that one.
/r/MensRights16/07/15 12:45 AM
1

Link.
/r/MensRights15/07/15 12:00 AM
2

This is satire, folks. Relax!
/r/MensRights14/07/15 07:55 PM
1

Depends on the context. "Bitch" is ok when its refers to female dogs, but that's not what it means in common usage. Similarly for "cis male" or "cishet male" or anything of that sort.
/r/MensRights14/07/15 06:15 PM
2

Because #KillAllMen is too kind. Nope! Somebody else has registered killallmen.com
/r/MensRights14/07/15 06:05 PM
3

Can you stop capitalising everything? It hurts my brain.
/r/MensRights13/07/15 09:00 PM
1

Yay! All idiots at one place, where they can be easily identified and ignored. I hope that atleast now, the other British parties start opposing feminism seriously instead of just grovelling before feminists like they do now.
/r/MensRights12/07/15 06:46 AM
2

You took the trouble to state your views in a long post as to why you are a feminist without calling us the usual "neckbeard" insults, so you deserve an answer. If you dont mind, i will try to do it later coz the answer itself will be long and i am short on time. As long as "Patriarchy Theory" has a grip on contemporary feminism there will never be any truce between MRA's and feminists, coz the concept of "Patriarchy" used to determine equality between men and women is flawed. Its useless to mak…
/r/MensRights11/07/15 11:06 PM
5

As some commenter in /r/india said (I'm paraphrasing) Problems in India like caste system, rape or anything else are seen as features of Indian society (i.e society is inherently fucked up) while problems in America like race relations, rape or gun violence are not seen as features in American society but something afflicting society (i.e society is fine, its some people/groups within it who are the problems) Its as if, they have a bottom-up view of Indian society but a top-down view of American…
/r/MensRights10/07/15 02:39 PM
1

Silly boy! All of the women are either lesbians or political lesbians. The men are used as sperm producers. Its the inverse of Mad Max : Fury Road.
/r/MensRights04/07/15 07:45 AM
1

Sex-selection is specifically banned in India. People get into serious trouble for telling the parents the gender of the unborn child.
/r/MensRights01/07/15 05:43 AM
3

/r/raisedbynarcissists/ That's the sub to post this. This doesnt belong in Mens Rights.
/r/MensRights30/06/15 08:12 AM
2

http://www.vice.com/read/is-reducing-the-male-population-by-90-percent-the-solution-to-all-our-problems But i think she has moved on from that.
/r/MensRights30/06/15 07:50 AM
5

Join the club.
/r/MensRights30/06/15 07:24 AM
1

I'm not saying feminism isnt responsible for misusing the idea. I'm saying its unfair to single it out when there was broad support for the idea that a woman deserves alimony after divorce. As to wether alimony is a Western concept and thus alien to Indian values argument is concerned; given that divorce was unknown we may never know that but i would say its but a short step from saying "a widow deserves support" to saying "a divorced woman deserves support" esp. when the immediate status of bot…
/r/MensRights25/06/15 05:46 PM
1

simply copy pasted lot of divorce laws from west without considering local culture I dont think so. I believe they adapted Western ideas to suit Indian context. In any case, the idea that a wife is entitled to maintainence isnt a radical idea for India. Divorce itself was unheard of but widows were expected to be maintained by the husband's family and that idea predates any interaction with the West. As the huge protests from every part of civil society against The Muslim Women (Protection of Ri…
/r/MensRights25/06/15 03:42 PM
1

But the expectation that the wife is "entitled" to have the same level of comfort after divorce is universal. Nothing specifically Indian abt that.
/r/MensRights25/06/15 03:05 PM
2

People who knew abt Robin Williams's situation would think that's a very bad idea, esp. if its lifetime alimony.
/r/MensRights25/06/15 02:44 PM
1

Isn't true Feminism also supportive of a majority of the things you have issues with? Feminists have been seen as arbitrators, or better yet judges, of equality between between men and women. In reality, they act as the legal team for women's side and act for the other side only when the interests of their clients i.e women are not hurt. And we cant blame them for that sexist attitude coz its right in their definition of feminism. From wiki, "Feminism is a range of movements and ideologies that …
/r/MensRights20/06/15 11:24 PM
1

Oh! I missed that. Thanks.
/r/MensRights19/06/15 12:44 AM
3

Where did they say that? Could you point it out?
/r/MensRights19/06/15 12:40 AM
5

Will there also be an analogue to NRA to teach men proper techniques of "women control"?
/r/MensRights17/06/15 08:56 PM
21

Oppressing their feels is as easy as shooting fish in a barrel. The mods must have been asleep to let it stay up that long.
/r/MensRights16/06/15 08:22 AM
7

Ha ha. So true. I didnt consider that.
/r/MensRights16/06/15 05:46 AM
2

Maybe this madness will cause them to take a relook at the laws. We can keep dreaming abt that one.
/r/MensRights16/06/15 05:25 AM
5

Keep dreaming. Like lesbian rape, female slut-shaming doesnt exist.
/r/MensRights16/06/15 04:57 AM
10

Looking at the votes, it seems that we are waaay more popular. Probably bcoz we have double the subscribers.
/r/MensRights16/06/15 04:24 AM
6

This wasnt her first time in the media. http://extracredit.blog.palmbeachpost.com/2015/05/08/arrest-wasnt-first-controversy-for-alleged-pot-smoking-principal/
/r/MensRights17/05/15 10:11 PM
2

That will be the day!! Feminists creating robots. Hold on for a sec while i LMAO. Its clearly fantasy coz robots run on logic and reasoning and feminists have none to give (coz feels >>>> logic yo). Edit : i think OP should x-post to /r/TumblrInAction for some real fun.
/r/MensRights17/05/15 07:40 AM
1

This has been asked many times. Surprisingly, MRA's are more to the left than the avg person. https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/2i2bt6/take_this_social_attitude_test/
/r/MensRights17/05/15 07:33 AM
5

From the article: Housework ---> Men : 1.5 hrs Women : 2.5 per day Difference --> 1 hrs/day From here Officework ----> Men : 8.4 hrs Women : 7.7 per day Difference ---> 0.7 hrs/day OMG, women work a whole 0.3 hrs (20 min) more per day.
/r/MensRights08/05/15 03:52 AM
9

They then forced him to drink an unknown substance from a bottle. This got him aroused quickly even though he was still scared and didn’t want to have sex. Did somebody successfully liquefy Viagra? or was it that the man didnt know it was alcohol? /nitpick
/r/MensRights07/05/15 04:50 PM
3

I am trying not to antagonise him anymore than necessary.
/r/MensRights07/05/15 10:29 AM
18

Its Chairperson Pao. Get it right, shitlord.
/r/MensRights07/05/15 08:53 AM
1

You're right. Dont know how i missed that.
/r/MensRights06/05/15 07:32 PM
24

I am voting with my dick for Putin. /s
/r/MensRights04/05/15 12:31 PM
16

Summary : "#FreeTheNipple". Men are pigs for looking.
/r/MensRights04/05/15 12:21 PM
1

https://www.reddit.com/r/TumblrInAction/wiki/tags
/r/MensRights04/05/15 12:16 PM
1

Not exactly. /u/bukkake_bonanza was trying to show that the amt was small in terms of dollars, but to an Indian that's a lot. Doubt he could buy the same for 8000 (or 80000) $ .
/r/MensRights30/04/15 08:06 PM
1

I am not a real estate dealer and India is notorious for crooked real estate sector but that was what i found. You can find more on the site which suggests its not an anamoly.
/r/MensRights30/04/15 07:51 PM
1

Yup! When he's able to buy this with the money, that will really show her.
/r/MensRights30/04/15 03:09 PM
4

Articles like these need to be published more often. In my opinion, most of the western society (including anti-feminists) have drunk the feminist kool-aid w.r.t the plight of women in the Orient.
/r/MensRights17/03/15 06:34 PM
5

I wasnt a committed feminist but i was definitely pro-feminism. Growing up, i had seen and read several articles and ads detailing the plight of women in my country. Being a young and impressionable male (and having loved the women in my family, which they reciprocated), i bought their arguments wholesale without any examination. Even when some of their arguments didnt make sense, i did the usual mental gymnastics to ensure those arguments became valid - even if doing so meant a reduction in my …
/r/MensRights16/03/15 10:37 PM
1

I agree with the drunk driver bit but you seem to be implying that those comments of the religious leaders are somehow symptomatic of Indian society. Why is that?
/r/MensRights15/03/15 07:58 PM
1

Yes, but religious people say some shit like that everywhere in the world. I am sure i could find some Christian fundamentalist preacher who says similar things.I could also probably find rapists in America saying similar things. But does that mean those sentiments are symptomatic of American society?
/r/MensRights15/03/15 07:43 PM
1

You could have just posted the article and left your analysis in the comment section.
/r/MensRights15/03/15 05:37 PM
1

I'd have to say you are massively wrong on this count. I have read several abt several such incidents over the past 2 decades. http://www.lfhri.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=220:in-the-last-10-months-17-women-were-stripped-naked-lfhri-report&catid=43:investigation-reports&Itemid=37 But /u/fundude1 is right in saying its a caste issue. I have never read abt an upper-caste woman being paraded. So its a caste issue not a men's rights issue.
/r/MensRights15/03/15 04:04 PM
3

My school practised corporal punishment. One really scary math teacher would twist the boy's ears, even if he was crying, until he was sure that the boy was scared. On the other hand if the girl started to sniffle, he would instantly stop. Overall teachers were nicer to girls, regardless of male or female. Boys routinely loose precious seats in engineering/medicine to lesser-qualified girls coz the selection committee applies govt-mandated bias towards girls. This bias even shows up when applyin…
/r/MensRights14/03/15 03:06 PM
1

Tell me, does your society allow a son to slack off, if the father has died off in some war or would he be told that his family is now his responsibility? i dont know of any society which allows that son to slack off unless he is too young. If previous history is any help, the sons will gladly pickup the responsibility and do so with pride. Stable societies might allow them to live their life their own way but in times of need, every man is expected to shoulder the weight society puts upon him, …
/r/MensRights13/03/15 12:59 PM
1

Well. have you researched into eastern europe attitudes towards males? I am a military history buff not a researcher, so you have to educate me here. Now men have been learning to refuse And though many have decided to withdraw in drones, their mere existence fuels the state, which in turn fuels women's ambitions, which in turn fuels status quo. Could you clarify?
/r/MensRights13/03/15 09:09 AM
2

Not really coz standards are not relaxed just because there are fewer men. Scarcity of males has happened several times in our history - most recently after WWII - and in each case, the remaining men were expected to fill the shoes of the missing men, apart from their own, without complain. So Male disposability dictates men aren't valued unless there's a severe lack of men. isnt true, even in extreme cases.
/r/MensRights13/03/15 08:53 AM
6

So after a long rant on why the present format sucks, she presents her vision, What would my Top Gear look like? Cool cars. Some cars that were not cool. Intelligent people saying things that were not facile. A vision for the future; a vision that baffled belief, a little like Tomorrow’s World, except, you know, just around the corner. Realistically, possibly, about to happen tomorrow. and thats it. What the hell does that even mean?
/r/MensRights12/03/15 07:05 PM
2

A small correction, its Valerie Solanas not Valorie Solaris.
/r/MensRights12/03/15 06:40 PM
2

Yes.
/r/MensRights08/01/15 12:23 AM
1

Just go backwards w.r.t the links posted on this sub.
/r/MensRights02/01/15 11:05 PM
7

They certainly did in India. https://toysoldier.wordpress.com/2013/03/06/a-sad-day-for-male-rape-victims-in-india/
/r/MensRights01/01/15 05:19 PM
1

Relevant. http://www.jadaliyya.com/pages/index/9371/orientalist-feminism-rears-its-head-in-india
/r/MensRights31/12/14 04:51 PM
2

I'm saying the gender discourse changed with the advent of feminism. Agreed Now men are considering their gender roles, and that didn't happen so much before. Consideration of gender roles happened before feminism as well. People used to talk abt the different roles of men and women in society, and different roles were assigned, after negotiation between the sexes, in order that society may function smoothly. Feminism turned what was a partnership into an adversarial relationship where motives o…
/r/MensRights29/12/14 06:20 PM
3

Feminism didnt give anybody a RIGHT to speak. People just spoke their mind. In the case of feminism, they actively suppressed male voices inside feminism coz feminism is abt women's experiences not abt the menz. If you dont believe me take a look at Warren Farrell, Karen de Crow, Christina Hoff Sommers etc. Most of the discussions abt men happened OUTSIDE feminism. Feminists today are trying to take credit for something they had no part in, as usual.
/r/MensRights29/12/14 04:06 PM
1

The Aus govt had a wonderful solution. Instead of calling it "mental health" problem, they called it a "mental fitness" problem. Link
/r/MensRights28/12/14 03:43 AM
1

We need more like her. Section 498a is soo misandric the man can either settle or face prison. Winning is not an option as any lawyer in India will tell you.
/r/MensRights28/12/14 12:42 AM
3

Couldnt have said it better.
/r/MensRights25/12/14 06:12 AM
3

I remember some 6 months - 1 yr ago (idk), some Scandanavian feminists worked themselves to a froth abt this and somebody responded with photos of women spreading their legs in public buses and trains. They claimed that they were all taken in one day. Does anybody else remember?
/r/MensRights24/12/14 08:17 PM
1

Could you point out the source of 1.5-7.5 % false rape accusations WITHIN the MRM coz i never heard of that before and feminists use 2-8% which i believe MRM disputes? Nobody here would disagree that a man attempting sex with a passed-out woman while being sober/conscious himself is rape, the question is if both are drunk and near passing out and attempt sex (being charitable), then why is the burden of getting consent fall only on the man (what happened to "Yes means Yes" for him)? Also given t…
/r/MensRights07/12/14 10:06 AM
3

Mensuration has its own meaning. I am wondering, whats sooo important that women need paid leave to measure?
/r/MensRights05/12/14 08:57 AM
1

Who in their right mind thinks commitment is directly proportional to price of the rings? Women compare rings all the time but I have never seen a man brag abt the ring he bought for his fiancee.
/r/MensRights10/10/14 10:47 AM
2

Welcome to the club.
/r/MensRights10/10/14 10:23 AM
1

All those will have passes. Guess we can call it the "pussy pass".
/r/MensRights10/10/14 04:13 AM
4

I will go with the site's findings. Its definitely does turn them off but its not a feminist conspiracy, its just one of those things in life that just is.
/r/MensRights08/10/14 03:07 PM
2

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/goa/Man-held-for-raping-in-laws-child-is-innocent/articleshow/44635509.cms So the man raped his MIL, SIL and daughter in three separate locations and at separate times. No wonder the police were hesitant to register until an NGO asked them to. Hope the police actually carry out their threat of prosecution on the "victims".
/r/MensRights08/10/14 03:01 PM
0

Nothing to do with men's rights, but remember that when someone is telling you how bad someone in their life is. True. But if she is lying, the mother should get the bullshitter of the year award coz the way she presents the guy, i have little doubt believing the guy is narcissistic and is an unsuitable father. On top of that, she has either manipulated the teacher, psychologist to back up her story (or atleast says they are) and is now attracting further scrutiny of her story with her daughter'…
/r/MensRights08/10/14 02:51 PM
8

Wow! The girl who sparked the TW controversy is calling Zoe Quinn "an emotional abuser". Let's wait and see how the feminists react to this.
/r/MensRights08/10/14 02:18 PM
-7

I dont know if they pasted it knowing it was the men's bathroom or mistook it for the women's bathroom.
/r/MensRights08/10/14 01:49 PM
3

You could tell her that it would be sexism against boys if she bans boys from walking on the homecoming court.
/r/MensRights08/10/14 01:43 PM
7

Sorry, the guy she describes is a genuine narcissistic creep. Even the daughter is uncomfortable around him. Glad that the mom caught this early before something happened.
/r/MensRights08/10/14 01:34 PM
5

As Warren Farrell said "Women are human beings, men are human doings". Only women can be objectified since society already treats men like objects.
/r/MensRights08/10/14 01:28 PM
2

Regardless of scenarios, the first thing you do is get a smart lawyer. Someone who can show evidence of consent or that the woman's story has holes in it. Presence of semen itself doesnt constitute rape. Pls remember, the difference between consensual sex and rape is intent. She's the accuser, so its upto her to show there was no intent.
/r/MensRights08/10/14 01:23 PM
1

Hope this is implemented. The no. of false rape cases would decrease and justice would be served.
/r/MensRights08/10/14 01:04 PM
1

Sorry but this is perfectly legal. Look at this law from Belgium and this law from U.S.A.
/r/MensRights08/10/14 12:40 PM
2

First off, why is the mother walking around only 2 yrs after murdering one baby and giving the other baby cerebral palsy? Or is the upcoming visitation to be done in prison? Either way, the Community Services Minister and DHS are going way out of their way to introduce the victim to the perp, when its not clear that the woman has repented.
/r/MensRights08/10/14 11:52 AM
2

Loved the fact that the SJW got called on his bullshit claim.
/r/MensRights08/10/14 09:55 AM
1

Agreed. If we close this sub to others, we risk becoming like feminists ourselves.
/r/MensRights08/10/14 05:30 AM
4

A modern day Don Quixote riding on weak arguments, who fights the imaginary "patriarchy".
/r/MensRights08/10/14 05:22 AM
1

I am not worried abt the possibility. The moment MRA's build some sort of ideology which claims women have since time immemorial oppressed men and that the world will be better off being all-male, is when they will replace feminists as the idiots to be mocked at. Start an Equalism (or something) movement where equality strives to be achieved from the perspective of a person, not a gender. There is a movement called Egalitarianism which does exactly that. Luckily, most MRA's are also egalitarian.
/r/MensRights08/10/14 03:44 AM
1

The comments are really funny.
/r/MensRights08/10/14 03:32 AM
1

So all of them are from Scotland then. OK.
/r/MensRights07/10/14 04:12 PM
1

Its been covered. https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/2hzi05/camille_paglia_thinks_rape_is_intrinsic_to_mens/
/r/MensRights07/10/14 04:08 PM
2

Yes, why cant MRA's use their patriarchal priveliege to fix all these issues instead of using it to bash feminists? /s The feminists refuse to see that we dont live under a patriarchy. They think if we give Obama and members of Congress our super-secret patriarchal handshake, all these items can be solved by tomorrow. It doesnt matter if we show proof that we dont live in a patriarchy. The very fact that we (i.e men) are trying to disprove it, is sufficient proof of the existence of the patriarc…
/r/MensRights07/10/14 04:01 PM
1

Then men dont have to live upto women's expectations. I am sure USA Today also supports that in the interests of equality. /s
/r/MensRights07/10/14 08:47 AM
1

Why is it sexist towards women? Because apparently all women are exactly the same, they have the exact same dating strategies because of society. I am not a mod on /r/feminism but i think they banned you coz they dont consider it sexist to say ""women should make the first move instead letting the men do it first, all the time". Remember the gold standard for female behaviour, according to feminism, is male behaviour. Women should act, walk, talk and think like men so that they achieve "equality…
/r/MensRights07/10/14 08:30 AM
1

Yeah. The idiot of a lawyer didnt mount a proper defense. If he had lined up a DV expert, she would have gotten less coz she was a textbook example of BWS. lets hope she appeals her unfair sentence.
/r/MensRights07/10/14 08:11 AM
1

Yeah, OP should reverse the genders and put it back up. It will serve the same purpose as "Dont be that girl" posters.
/r/MensRights07/10/14 06:53 AM
1

Answer this first. What do women want?
/r/MensRights07/10/14 06:36 AM
1

Could you comment on these? I am not trolling. http://nationalprogressive.blogspot.in/2012/05/feminist-case-against-era.html http://www.eagleforum.org/psr/1986/sept86/psrsep86.html
/r/MensRights06/10/14 04:04 AM
1

The laws that MRM fights against are feminist laws. So it's natural that the MRM is anti-feminism. You cant change those laws without changing the ideology i.e feminism, behind those sexist laws.
/r/MensRights06/10/14 03:58 AM
2

Ever heard of cherrypicking?
/r/MensRights05/10/14 07:42 PM
2

Ahh! Light at the end of the tunnel. So you think feminists dont wish for equality. Actually they do wish for equality and constantly keep talking abt it but the equality that they are thinking of and the equality than you and i think of are two seperate positions. I cant post a voiceformen link but search for the "Feminism v. Equality" article by Diana Davison.. It shows how feminism distorts the word to mean something completely different.
/r/MensRights05/10/14 04:35 PM
1

So you are saying the equality that feminists wish for is the same exact equality that MRA's and anti-feminists think abt. Is that correct?
/r/MensRights05/10/14 04:16 PM
1

Since you treat me like a 5 yr old, could you ELI5 how "Feminists are big fans of Blank Slate" is somehow countered by "Have you heard that feminists hate men?" . What does "Blank Slate" mean to you?
/r/MensRights05/10/14 03:57 PM
2

I thought i was addressing your point Feminists believe it least of all. abt Blank Slate, which is exactly opposite to my knowledge. Most of the opposition to Pinker's book and his ideas come from feminists and from scientists steeped in "Blank Slate". Feminists are big fans of Blank Slate. I would like to know what made you believe it was otherwise?
/r/MensRights05/10/14 03:05 PM
1

You're welcome. Anti-feminism is still new in India so there isnt any "properly published scientific or government study with a fully described methodology" for now, the DCW report is as official as you can get. Its just infuriating sometimes. Most of the negative perceptions abt India emanate, not from Pakistanis (and i have talked to them for 10 yrs), but from the people in the West who are absolutely convinced "Slumdog Millionaire" paints a real picture of India.
/r/MensRights05/10/14 02:31 PM
2

Yeah nobody believes that so there's no need for a rebuttal.Feminists believe it least of all. Sorry, that's not true. Its the entire basis of the feminist version of equality. It says the only reason there is female underachievement is because society conditions women to be calm and demure while conditioning men to be aggressive and competitive. It explicitly denies that boys and girls have any innate tendencies as a result of evolution. This theory underpins those educational programs in schoo…
/r/MensRights05/10/14 08:25 AM
3

Yet another conservative confused over what feminists believe. Their rejection of immutable sex differences Dafuck? I think she meant the feminists pushing the "Blank Slate" theory of sexual differences i.e male infants and female infants have no difference in outlook, behaviour etc and are conditioned by society to behave as a typical male and female. Look up the book by Steven Pinker in the sidebar for a rebuttal to this or watch Hjernevask for the arguments among scientists abt this theory.
/r/MensRights05/10/14 06:19 AM
1

Can you comment abt "Innocent until proven guilty" w.r.t to rape coz the argument you made wouldnt be allowed if it were any other crime. Would you deny a young man a college education coz he was once an accused in a murder trial?
/r/MensRights05/10/14 05:47 AM
1

If you want the long version, here's comment by /u/lafielle abt the phenomena called feminism. https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/2hbot8/tell_me_about_hateful_feminists_that_you_have/ckr9hmm
/r/MensRights05/10/14 05:15 AM
2

These links have been posted before here but people tend to forget http://www.thehindu.com/data/the-many-shades-of-rape-cases-in-delhi/article6261042.ece http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/article6265285.ece http://www.thehindu.com/news/cities/Delhi/rape-cases-scripted-firs-fail-court-test/article6268958.ece I dont understand why people here think that feminist statistics abt US are misleading or false but those released abt India are beyond reproach. Why this schadenfreude?
/r/MensRights05/10/14 04:26 AM
1

Thanks.
/r/MensRights05/10/14 01:15 AM
1

Yes, the term "patriarchy" has been around for a long time but the 3rd wave feminists took it, redefined it and popularized it. Here's the Ngram for "patriarchy". As you can see it started to get popular around late 60's and 70's, right around the time 3rd wave feminism took off. https://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=patriarchy&year_start=1800&year_end=2000&corpus=15&smoothing=0&share=&direct_url=t1%3B%2Cpatriarchy%3B%2Cc0
/r/MensRights04/10/14 06:00 AM
3

I can understand why ordinary people might be unwilling to draft women but are there any proposals to extend the tax on unwilling men onto women? coz that feels like a nobrainer to me in these modern times where women work alongside men.
/r/MensRights04/10/14 05:04 AM
1

Can this "erotic capital gap" be used as a factor in the "wage gap"?
/r/MensRights04/10/14 03:52 AM
2

Part 2 of the conference where a cop talks abt interviewing a suspect. Together they will give you the complete picture as to what happens when you get arrested.
/r/MensRights04/10/14 02:37 AM
4

This is nothing but clickbait. The researchers found that, for fruit flies, the size of the offspring matched the size of the first male the mother mated with – not its biological father. It is thought that molecules of the semen produced by the first partner might be absorbed by the mother’s immature eggs. First of all, nobody is saying the offspring do not have the DNA of the biological father. The article implies that the offspring have the characteristics of the previous partner not the DNA …
/r/MensRights03/10/14 05:29 AM
1

Loved the comments esp. when the other commenters jumped on the feminist who tried the "men do it more" line.
/r/MensRights03/10/14 03:47 AM
2

Ha ha ha! My old-fashioned grandmother told me to watch out for "bitches" (closest thing literally) these days who just suck the life out of the men in their lives. A sentiment shared by most of the women in my family. Grandmas come is all sizes and shapes, so dont try to generalize based on one example.
/r/MensRights03/10/14 03:05 AM
1

Yeah. The interesting thing was the test the doctor used to assign a gender to the baby. Seemed totally legit to me but i guess the "Blank Slate" scientist would blow his brains out on that.
/r/MensRights03/10/14 02:13 AM
1

Is there any law which can put this woman in jail? She just admitted to poisoning 324 men (not to mention the people those men unknowingly infected).
/r/MensRights03/10/14 02:10 AM
1

Some things are so obvious that they dont need to be stated. Dont you understand its a man's God-given right to take pics of naked boys for his own personal pleasure. /s
/r/MensRights03/10/14 02:02 AM
1

Is it "entrapment" only when the police do it? could somebody help me.
/r/MensRights03/10/14 12:49 AM
1

Your comment makes total sense now. Pls dont forget the /s next time. For an hour, i thought one of us had gone full retard. Yeah. you cant win against extremists with logic. But we keep trying, hoping they might have some sort of epiphany. Hopefully soon.
/r/MensRights02/10/14 06:02 PM
1

How does Keep fighting after somebody has surrendered is typically how female on male domestic violence works. lead to Unless you are some kind of woman beater. WTF?? I don't actually know what type egalitarianism is the right kind for every situation, but I hate to muddy that convo. This sub seems to be more about erring on the side of punishment. Which would make sense if you are trying to prove a point. Again, how do those disjoint 3 sentences form a train of thought? Could you ELI5 coz i did…
/r/MensRights02/10/14 04:24 PM
1

Sorry but do you want to keep fighting her after she has surrendered? Yes, society is biased against men (as OP was) but its time to turn the gun against someone else. OP has accepted her mistake or she wouldnt be here. She could have posted on /r/TwoXChromosomes and gotten away with fake regret.
/r/MensRights02/10/14 01:05 PM
1

Progressivism 80 Socialism 31.25 Tenderness 56.25 Your test scores indicate that you are an open-minded progressive; this is the political profile one might associate with a university professor. It appears that you are skeptical towards religion, and have a generally optimistic attitude towards humanity in general. Your attitudes towards economics appear capitalist, and combined with your social attitudes this creates the picture of someone who would generally be described as a libertarian. To …
/r/MensRights02/10/14 11:53 AM
1

Sorry. But you are late by a few decades.
/r/MensRights02/10/14 11:35 AM
2

No. Since feminists are wonderful at creating enemies with their "I am always right OR you are a misogynist turd" arguments, the new ones they have created in the past year created a tipping point for the discussion of anti-feminism in the mainstream.
/r/MensRights02/10/14 12:41 AM
2

At one time, this would have been in the comedy section of the newspaper. Its a commentary on the times that this has become a serious issue.
/r/MensRights02/10/14 12:02 AM
3

You're here, aren't you? /s The fact that various men's rights issues like Men as DV victims rather than always as perpetrators Men as rape victims (sometimes by women) rather than always as rapists. Fathers being seen as an important part of a child's life rather than someone who just pays the bills while the mother takes care of the child etc. Fathers being denied justice in family courts regarding custody. Alimony laws being seen as unfair to men. wouldnt have been talked abt 10 yrs ago. But …
/r/MensRights01/10/14 02:06 AM
1

Thats a good one.
/r/MensRights30/09/14 02:16 AM
4

You should look at Hjernevask (Brainwashing) on youtube, on how scientists are divided w.r.t feminist arguments and non-feminist arguments on various social issues.
/r/MensRights30/09/14 02:08 AM
1

You should take a look at the documentary "Divorce Corp". There are several examples of such stupid behaviour on part of everyone in the family court system. Nobody can appeal against the violations of their rights in these judgements coz they get to dismiss any rights a father has "in the best interests of the child".
/r/MensRights30/09/14 01:51 AM
6

Are you here to debate or to troll? Either be polite or just go back to /r/againstmensrights where this behaviour might be tolerated.
/r/MensRights28/09/14 11:11 PM
1

Back to the Victorian era then. The sexual, moral and political attitudes of those days were so much fun. /s But seriously, saying "women should love, honor and cherish their husbands" is not the same as saying "women should learn to tame their husbands". Nobody wants a master/slave relationship to be the dominant model for interactions between the opposite sexes. Maybe as a kink sometimes, but not always. Tammy Bruce should take the idea she propagated in the video "Thats an idea only an intell…
/r/MensRights28/09/14 09:53 PM
0

Its a free country! But it doesnt mean freedom from consequences. If someone believes a slut walk is necessary coz "The Patriarchy" controls women's sexuality, they should let someone else hold the belief that the women in there are pro-promiscuity. Both are valid beliefs coz beliefs dont need to be proven.
/r/MensRights27/09/14 12:38 AM
2

What was the point? That men are less attracted to a less fertile woman than a more fertile woman. Also, the gender reversed video only proved that women care less abt how the man looks coz being fat or thin is not an indicator of success. If you want a gender-reversed video, see what happens when after a date, a man is asked to pay vs when a woman is asked to pay.
/r/MensRights26/09/14 06:49 PM
1

Apart from Karen Straughn's youtube channel, you should try http://honeybadgerbrigade.com/ They are more regular than the others and are more informative.
/r/MensRights26/09/14 06:26 PM
1

Well, maybe not shove it in their faces, but do remind them when they start their man-hating.
/r/MensRights26/09/14 04:00 PM
1

Thanks. I will get back to reading now.
/r/MensRights26/09/14 02:04 PM
2

They were often motivated by a sense that they had no other way to resolve the issues they faced other than violently lashing out, the analysts said. Apparently "Man up" doesnt work on men with psychological issues.
/r/MensRights26/09/14 02:54 AM
2

Nice intentions. Wrong methods. Even if immensely successful, this will go the way of #BringBackOurGirls i.e a complete and utter waste of time. I dont think male suicide victims respond to emotional words. They respond to emotional actions. A better way would have been to give them emotional support like talking abt things they like or a campaign to intervene if you see a depressed male who you think might commit suicide.
/r/MensRights26/09/14 02:29 AM
2

I am assuming that you copypasted the text from somewhere. Could you post the original link?
/r/MensRights26/09/14 02:07 AM
1

This is a more balanced story. http://www.newyorker.com/currency-tag/do-more-women-on-the-board-mean-better-results
/r/MensRights26/09/14 02:01 AM
1

Sorry didnt feel that way. I enjoyed myself.
/r/MensRights26/09/14 01:16 AM
1

I think its some British female journalist based for a long time in Pakistan. specifically how when curfew is implemented in Karachi (or when its too dangerous), only the men move around or something. Hope that helps.
/r/MensRights24/09/14 07:32 PM
2

Thanks for the long but clear post. You put into writing what so many of us can feel but find expressing it difficult. Upvoting both comments.
/r/MensRights24/09/14 04:32 PM
1

The correct link is http://www.thenation.com/article/181569/how-feminists-and-liberals-enabled-modern-police-state
/r/MensRights23/09/14 07:10 PM
7

So, let them try. Its not like their arguments are so strong that MRAs generally lose. Just make sure they abide by the mod rules. I like this sub coz its a debate hall on gender issues, not a echo chamber like /r/Feminism and i certainly wouldnt want it to turn into one.
/r/MensRights22/09/14 03:07 PM
3

after ALMOST snapping and beating the shit out of a woman today. I am guessing he knows not to use violence. As he said, he's just letting off some steam.
/r/MensRights22/09/14 02:55 PM
1

You're probably right, given that it was so long ago I'm sure she completely forgot about it. Not to mention that since she later on got caught writing a rape threat on her own locker, she probably does this sort of thing all the time as this behavior goes unpunished because everyone thinks punishing this sort of thing will make real victims scared to come forward. I found her twitter and on it she has mentioned numerous times that she was raped. Taking her track record into consideration, you c…
/r/MensRights21/09/14 11:30 PM
7

You are letting your life be determined by someone who doesnt even know that you exist (and i dont think a bully like her is the type to care). Dont let her do that. Try talking abt it to your friends or with a therapist. You shouldnt let any kind of resentment fester or it will eat you away (from personal exp). Focus on the good things in your life, chase your dreams and you will forget her completely. There are support groups for the victims of false allegations (like these) in some areas. Fin…
/r/MensRights21/09/14 10:45 PM
1

I do agree that woman make false allegations but, in this case, its not the woman who identified the accused, its the cops. Which is why the cops should be the one who should pay. Something similar to this. And where did i say anything abt "mental illness" in the comment that you replied to. Look way above to my previous comments, i clearly said If she is nuts, she should just be sent to a mental institution and any further accusations should not be believed straightaway, until evidence is found…
/r/MensRights19/09/14 04:38 PM
1

Well, then release his name after conviction. No reason to assume he is guilty before being convicted or that other victims wont come forward after conviction.
/r/MensRights19/09/14 04:28 PM
1

You seem to be misreading me. I said what if a woman who was actually raped, gives an imprecise description of the assailant and the cops pick some guy off the streets, who matches the description, has no alibi for time when the rape happened. In this case, it was the cops who bungled the investigation. The woman didnt falsely accuse the man, it was the cops who did so, when they charged him and it should be the cops who pay for it. If you think this doesnt happen, read the Causes section of The…
/r/MensRights19/09/14 03:25 PM
0

So, you want a woman to be punished for the cops's mistakes. Sorry, i cannot support that.
/r/MensRights19/09/14 02:08 PM
1

But that comes under the 1st degree, right. Not the 2nd degree. Edit - I think you need 4 degrees here. The 2nd must be split up into 2 seperate degrees.
/r/MensRights19/09/14 01:59 PM
1

I disagree with your 3rd and 2nd degree punishment, but i fully support the 1st. If she is nuts, she should just get sent to a mental institution and any further accusations should not be believed straightaway, until evidence is found otherwise. As for the 2nd, what happens when a woman who is actually raped, describes the assailant imprecisely (happens all the time), but the cops arrest the wrong guy (again, happens all the time). would you punish the woman? In this case, its the cops who shoul…
/r/MensRights19/09/14 01:53 PM
1

Since you seem to have skipped over the part, let me reiterate, NOBODY uses Wikipedia data to conclude ANYTHING. Your claim is FALSE straightaway. Second, you claim i skipped over females. i skipped them if they were victims. if you think i was wrong, show me where. Dont just point, take your time and show me.
/r/MensRights19/09/14 12:28 PM
1

Well, first of all, Wikipedia is not a reliable source coz the data could be incomplete (can you be sure that every thrill killing has been documented there?) and there is the possibility of false information ( it can be edited by anyone, silly). Nobody uses Wikipedia data to derive any sort of facts. Second, even if it were utterly reliable, it still doesnt bear out your claim. Look at it yourself - Nathan Leopold and Richard Loeb (2M) Zodiac Killer (1M) Stephen Wayne Jamieson, Matthew James El…
/r/MensRights18/09/14 10:05 PM
2

Sorry, but could you give a link which says that women and women in groups are the majority of thrill killers, coz i couldnt find a link in wikipedia.
/r/MensRights18/09/14 03:40 PM
3

Reminds me of the joke abt the boy who was sentenced to prison for murdering his parents, asking the judge for leniency coz he is an orphan.
/r/MensRights18/09/14 02:28 PM
9

People still cant wrap their heads around the fact that sometimes women lie, even when proof is staring them in the face. Its like women have a moral gene that men dont or women are angels who gently descended from heaven and men are hell's demons who clawed their way to the surface.
/r/MensRights18/09/14 01:47 PM
8

Google "Feminism is good for men". You will get tons of articles claiming the same. But thats not the same as saying "feminism cares/works for men too". All of the supposed benefits that men get are "trickle down" effects or unintended consequences of feminist laws. To illustrate the difference, here's an example from a British historian called Niall Ferguson, who says "Colonialism is good for India" coz Indians got "proper" Western education, railways, post offices, IAS etc. The counter-argumen…
/r/MensRights17/09/14 07:02 PM
1

The wife doesnt but the her lawyer does, and he always gives one excuse or the other and keeps asking for extensions to do this or that. Courts in India are so interested in accurate justice than speedy justice, that this kind of behaviour is more or less tolerated, even when the judges believe otherwise. On the other hand, the courts are considered fair and even-handed, so they have higher rep than police or govt, who are immensely corrupt.
/r/MensRights17/09/14 03:46 PM
1

Ha ha. Look at the sidebar. She's already loved by the movement.
/r/MensRights17/09/14 01:43 PM
1

I am sorry but werent they always there in the universities.
/r/MensRights17/09/14 01:33 PM
2

I think i have read this article before but it felt good to read it again.
/r/MensRights15/09/14 11:25 PM
1

Ok. I'll bite. The problem is you're hoping that with enough arguments and facts, you will be able to eradicate the influence of religion. But you are assuming people are perfectly rational, when there is enough evidence that they are not. People are born prioritising feelings over logic (we have to be trained to think rationally; children are irrational). There will always be people who use "faith" to stop listening to you or your arguments coz religion is usually a personal experience. The way…
/r/MensRights15/09/14 11:11 PM
4

Yes. Apparently someone told someone "someone's in love with someone else, so someone's moving on". Then someone wrote an article abt someone's love for someone and everyone's happy abt it.
/r/MensRights15/09/14 10:16 PM
2

But I don't think that the point of the MRM is to constantly battle feminists But its not conservatives, liberals or any other political group who are opposing the MRA's, its the feminists. They alone are responsible for opposition to men's rights. I know most feminists ie "coffee shop" feminists (like you) understand the need for the MRA's but if you believe radical feminists (who speak for feminism worldwide) would fight for men's rights, you are clearly delusional. it should be a discussion f…
/r/MensRights15/09/14 06:09 PM
1

Sure, if you used the dictionary definition ie "equality regardless of gender", everybody here is a feminist. But as #womenagainstfeminism have shown, many here call themselves anti-feminists, not because of what feminists preach but what they practice. If feminists made laws, which addressed the concerns of BOTH men and women, there would be no need for MRA's. But as you know, they make unfair laws against men, belittle men who complain and usually exxagerate female issues and shrink male issue…
/r/MensRights15/09/14 04:50 PM
-1

Happy cake day. Have an upvote as well.
/r/MensRights15/09/14 12:45 PM
1

Stick around, many of the MRA's are not knuckledragging apes (like feminists believe). Also, dont worry abt being called a concern troll. it seems like every new guy gets called that once (as i was). just dont start fights and nobody will bother you.
/r/MensRights15/09/14 01:00 AM
3

There is common ground which most (not all) people identifying as feminists and MRA's would agree on, like shared parenting, help for male DV victims etc. We have seen articles written by feminists abt the need to address male issues since the people agitating abt it are anti-feminist MRA's, and not feminists themselves, implying that there is validity in some MRA arguments. The problem arises when feminists (esp. radical feminists) try to link such issues with "The Patriarchy" which is an unfal…
/r/MensRights14/09/14 08:32 PM
2

Most of them would call themselves feminists but can you guarantee that all of them are feminists or that they will put feminism above any other social issue? Probably not, considering FI got only around 4% of the vote. Also most of the women identifying as feminists, and women in general, havent had the chance to hear a proper debate on anti-feminism, only feminist propaganda. No reason to assume that they would forever remain feminists. The arguments which once convinced us to be anti-feminist…
/r/MensRights14/09/14 06:32 PM
1

So thats a little more than 50% potential anti-feminists. Of course political alliances may change, but discussion abt anti-feminism will enter the political mainstream like never before.
/r/MensRights14/09/14 04:51 PM
1

Initially that's true but it also forces the other parties to search for alternatives in the long term. They cant forever counter feminists by copying feminist policies. As i said, it opens up space for discussion abt anti-feminism. Also, given that feminist policies are so one-sided, the political need for anti-feminist policies will increase.
/r/MensRights14/09/14 12:55 PM
1

How strong is the coalition in terms of seats?
/r/MensRights14/09/14 01:39 AM
2

This is good news. 1) When feminists were just lobbying, they could count on multi-party support but when they have their own party, why would other parties support them? Also, it allows other parties to be openly anti-feminists. By chasing power, feminists had to loose their influence on the parties. 2) It allows public discussion on anti-feminism coz its now a political battle. It will be a feminism vs anti-feminism (not all of them MRA's) fight and not the men vs women fight which feminists h…
/r/MensRights13/09/14 11:52 PM
1

Ok. Excuse my ignorance. I am more familiar with the Indian Army than the American Army.
/r/MensRights13/09/14 11:09 PM
1

But doesnt every officer go through West Point before getting his commision. i dont know of any other way someone can become an officer in US Army/Navy/Airforce/Marines , so do you know any other way (except for field commisions which rarely happens in peacetime)?
/r/MensRights13/09/14 10:14 PM
1

True. But the report also says of the 238 West Point graduates commissioned to be infantry officers in 2012, only seven were black I dont know abt the figures regarding intake of blacks as officers yearwise but i hope 2% (7 of 238) is an anamoly. Also USA Today’s research found that 25 relevant brigades it looked at did not have a single black commander in 2014 People can tolerate disparity in the lower ranks but wont do so if that happens in the upper ranks. It again comes back to "cannon fodde…
/r/MensRights13/09/14 09:46 PM
1

This is something to worry abt. An army from a multicultural society cannot be exclusive to one region, group or ethnicity. its composition must reflect that of society for it to be trusted. It might look unfair to people believing in meritocracy but there are good political reasons. For example, in 1971, Bengali politicians saw the Pakistani army as an occupying army coz they were so few of them in it. In recent years, the Pakistan Army has increased its recruitment from Sindh and Balochistan p…
/r/MensRights13/09/14 09:03 PM
2

Not directly related to the topic but, I once watched feminist propaganda which said "Women are better long distance swimmers because they have more fat to burn and have a greater pain tolerance. Soon they will be setting the long distance records". Needless to say that never happened.
/r/MensRights12/09/14 08:22 PM
0

Thats not happening. Its a bit like asking for all protestants and catholics to come together coz they believe in christianity. they may coexist but cannot for the love of god, integrate. One side has to completely give up for that to happen and neither side is in a mood to forget the insults and the attacks.
/r/MensRights06/09/14 08:57 PM
1

What if, in the future,there are good scientific reasons as why they should be seperated? would you hold on to your ideals or would you be practical? Ex - Given that (if we believe Erin Pizzey) most DV victims are themselves violent and tend to seek out violent partners, wouldnt a desegregated environment be the perfect place for such people. such a policy would mean that such shelters would increase DV rather than decreasing it.
/r/MensRights06/09/14 12:43 PM
1

that man is a good father with his priorities straight. Hope he hasnt suffered any further, it would break my heart.
/r/MensRights04/09/14 02:54 PM
0

i bet you didnt read the link. Its a link to a graph, not to any book propounding any theory. this might surprise you but most people here believe that the first and second wave of feminism (do you know what they are?) were necessary for gender equality. if you believe that mra's oppose first and second wave aims, prove it. people here are mostly pissed off abt radical feminists, who form the third wave. Word of advice - I am not an MRA but if you keep a closed mind here and just spout feminist …
/r/MensRights28/08/14 01:51 AM
0

The suffragettes had very little of any ideology. if you use google ngram https://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=patriarchy&year_start=1800&year_end=2000&corpus=15&smoothing=0&share=&direct_url=t1%3B%2Cpatriarchy%3B%2Cc0 you can see the term "patriarchy" came to popularity after 1960. "the patriarchy" came to being with the third wave of feminism. if you have any sources that show the suffragettes believed in patriarchy theory, i would love to see it.
/r/MensRights28/08/14 01:29 AM
1

No, just surprised there are so few stories here. i looked at today's posts and found that to be true as well. lots of arguments, some hate but few experiences. Now i understand that you dont have to experience something to oppose it but given the statistics of discrimination against men and reddit, and particularly this sub, being mostly male, i would have expected to find more. maybe this is par for this sub or maybe i phrased my question wrong or maybe people dont like to talk abt it even her…
/r/MensRights23/08/14 06:54 AM
-1

True but I am not asking for news stories, but stories of redditors whose legal rights have been violated. So far i have only got five.
/r/MensRights23/08/14 01:37 AM
-1

To my knowledge, equal pay laws are gender neutral. You can use it if you have been discriminated against. I have never heard the point you are making that its only one-way.
/r/MensRights23/08/14 12:09 AM
-1

The only case of pay discrimination against men that i know of is from scotland. could you give an US example?
/r/MensRights22/08/14 11:57 PM
-1

Yup. under feminist classification i also come under "shitlord". Exactly! which is why i asked if anybody here had their rights violated.
/r/MensRights22/08/14 11:46 PM
-1

If you have been paid less than a woman in the same job, your rights have been violated. if you have been refused any service given to women coz you are a man, your rights have been violated. I dont know if LAWS is an acronym for something but VAWA is discriminatory
/r/MensRights22/08/14 11:34 PM
0

I know the research. lurking here has exposed me to the research. If i was trolling for stories, i wouldnt have clarified abt asking for violations of "mens rights" and not "mens issues". i would get a lot more if i added "mens issues". I just would like to know this sub has actual victims and not SJW's of the male kind who are outraged anytime a man feels hurt. Edit : Added "violations of"
/r/MensRights22/08/14 11:23 PM
-1

But i do consider it relevant. You get the govt to make laws to protect your rights but you solve your own issues, not get the govt to solve it for you.
/r/MensRights22/08/14 11:11 PM
-1

Pls read my comments to /u/Methodius_ and /u/aussiehank . Also i have removed my leading questions. I believe that "pay gap myth" and "teach men not to rape" come under "mens issues" not "mens rights". i am looking for the later. i agree that the rest of your points come under "mens rights". I believe my question should properly be "How many men here have had their rights violated by courts/laws/women?" Pls do share your personal experiences. Edit : Added a clarification as to my intent.
/r/MensRights22/08/14 10:41 PM
-1

Ok. you're right. i have removed the leading questions.
/r/MensRights22/08/14 10:31 PM
-2

I am looking for people's experiences with shitty laws or unreasonable expectations of people around you coz you are a man. things which come under "men's rights" not "mens issues". You have made a good summary of negative experiences in your life, but only a few of them come under "mens rights". For example, in point 1, you cant expect not to be taught to worship women. parents have a right to guide their children's education as they see fit. Similarly i disagree with points 2,3,4,5,8,9,10. I d…
/r/MensRights22/08/14 10:25 PM
-2

Well i thought i was clear why i cared, but i will elaborate. I dont want to be part of a circlejerk. thats no different from being a feminist (different gender).
/r/MensRights22/08/14 09:44 PM
2

Unless you are willing to be celibate as well , i dont see how this helps.
/r/MensRights22/08/14 07:51 PM
1

If the complaint is congress doesnt represent the views of the people who elected them, join the club. but if you are saying that male congressmen cannot legislate on matters affecting women because they are male, the logical solution would be seperate electorates for men and women. the attitude should be the right person for the job, not the right gender for the job.
/r/MensRights21/08/14 02:38 AM
2

Women are just as aggressive and determined as men are, but suffer from physical limitations. they have more wear and tear injuries compared to male soldiers and they cannot carry heavy loads for the same period as men. IMHO they are better suited for defensive warfare than offensive warfare. Edit : grammer
/r/MensRights21/08/14 01:37 AM
5

Do you know or heard of any female who was falsely accused of rape? I havent heard of any lesbians being prosecuted for rape, even though that happens. So its a mens right problem. Second most rape accusations are usually false, unless you believe feminist sources. Edit: Apparently lesbians can be prosecuted for rape. But i have not been able to find any lesbians who have been falsely accused (will keep looking though).
/r/MensRights21/08/14 12:24 AM
1

Pt 3 by the same author http://www.thehindu.com/news/cities/Delhi/rape-cases-scripted-firs-fail-court-test/article6268958.ece
/r/MensRights01/08/14 01:51 AM
1

Pt 2 by the same author http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/article6265285.ece
/r/MensRights31/07/14 10:06 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter