TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

rhllor Archive

View 0 posts and 59 comments by rhllor on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
5

but you wouldn't find men reporters in female locker rooms now would you? That's a lie. • The NFL, Major League Baseball, the NBA and the NHL all designate the locker room as a work environment. While one of the Jets players reportedly yelled at Sainz, "This is our locker room," the reality is that the locker room is a workplace where many people -- including me and other women -- do our jobs. We're not given an alternative option. The rooms are open to the media at designated times. There is no…
/r/MensRights17/09/10 05:50 AM
1

Seriously, the gentleman shit is just plain retarded. I've thought of a snarky retort the next time I'm called on it (e.g. opening doors, lifting shit): "Would you like me to do it with my penis? You have arms too, amirite?"
/r/MensRights28/07/10 01:38 PM
2

Of course it's not a requirement anymore, but most weddings still reflect the traditional sense, like father of the bride "giving her away," but there is no such thing from the groom. Also, IIRC, the veil's purpose in an arranged marriage is so that the groom can only gaze upon the bride once the ceremony is over. The most glaring part however is the surname. Women have the option of keeping their (father's) name, but the majority are still indoctrinated with the taking-the-man's-name tradition.…
/r/MensRights10/07/10 07:20 PM
6

Wait: employers prefer those who achieved higher marks in school? What the... Looking at the bar graph, that's also how I would rank fresh grad candidates for a position. For a more senior position, reverse the top three qualifications. This is despite not having a degree. I left university early because of a lucrative job offer, and I never looked back. Nevertheless, I had good grades. Working hard for your degree is your own choice. Yeah I did party, logged hundreds of hours in video games, et…
/r/MensRights06/07/10 01:33 PM
1

Another major one is that boys are interested in books with violence or rude humor. These books are becoming way less available in favor of mild and proper books more likely to appeal to girls. This leads to way less boys ever learning to enjoy reading. I disagree with your first sentence, but the rest is spot on. And there is only the retarded conservatives who has perverted the education curriculum to blame. Texas, anyone? Also, these are the same people that would be horrified at finding Lord…
/r/MensRights06/07/10 08:14 AM
4

TL;DR Go back to the kitchen. take care of the family at the same time instead of just doing the latter What do you mean? Men should just work at... work, and not at home? This leaves the children of the family without parental care and the whole family often has much more unhealthy meals. Won't somebody think of the children?! pulled from their housewife expectancy This is exactly the kind of barbaric conservatism that necessitated the emergence of feminism.
/r/MensRights24/06/10 07:19 AM
2

Oh so it's a joke site? Okay then.
/r/MensRights24/06/10 01:04 AM
10

Wow. This is from a blog that says We will also do our damnedest to objectify women, not because we believe it’s bad for them but because it makes feminists very unhappy! in its "manifesto" section. But this post is in no way misogyny at all, amirite, it's protecting the rights of men. Way to reinforce the men are less mature than women stereotype. This site is like the Westboro Baptist Church of MR.
/r/MensRights23/06/10 06:51 AM
1

Split parental leave between moms and dads (which I know has nothing to do with the submission, but bear with me). This way, if couples decide to have children, they both know that both their careers are going to be affected --> no obvious need for alimony because both did sacrifice their jobs to care for a baby.
/r/MensRights15/06/10 07:55 AM
5

Yahoo is like the AOL for those who discovered the internet after the AOL era. Click any random news story and check out the comments. Jesus Christ. That being said, it is insecurity - but of women, but of other men. I'M TOUGHER THAN YOU! I HAVE A BIGGER PENIS! I SEE THE FEMINAZIS ARE HARD AT WORK TRYING TO TURN ALL REAL MEN INTO PURSE POODLES--LOL--LOOK AT HOW THESE FEMINAZIS TREAT THEIR MEN BULLING THEM WITH THREATS --DONT BELIEVE THIS CRAP--ONLY GAY MEN ARE ALLOWED TO BE SENSITIVE AND UNTILL …
/r/MensRights11/06/10 05:20 PM
3

Because it's... sexist? As I've posted above, GTA, Manhunt, Hitman, etc. In these games, you can assassinate people regardless of gender. RapeLay specifically targets females for being females, like as if males cannot be raped as well. I'm surprised that this point isn't more popular in MR. Males can be raped too, amirite? So it's discrimination against males (in that males cannot be rape victims) that in RapeLay you can only rape females, amirite?
/r/MensRights10/06/10 01:10 AM
0

GTA: Inflict violent crime on people, male or female. RapeLay: Inflict violence/rape on... women. That's not exactly the same. Both males and females can go out late at night and get mugged; I have yet to see a statistic wherein males getting raped are even comparable to females. So if RapeLay (and HeyBaby) are playable when you can inflict violence on people regardless of gender, then it would be just like GTA. And only conservatives with a stick up their ass (pardon the pun; i.e., Fred Thompso…
/r/MensRights09/06/10 03:43 PM
3

Also, girls can wear pants. Boys can't wear skirts. BUT WHY?!
/r/MensRights04/06/10 01:48 AM
-3

Er... did you confuse MR and 2X?
/r/MensRights02/06/10 02:26 AM
3

Almost all but the smallest reddits have their share of degenerates.
/r/MensRights30/05/10 02:55 PM
10

I like the way this relates to men's rights, in the way that the degree program is actually religious and women's studies, mentioned in one phrase towards the end. What if it's, say, a BA in philosophy, and the case study is a guy?
/r/MensRights30/05/10 04:50 AM
3

someone who's made it clear clear that they didn't want it This sounds good argumentatively - but how does this translate to legalese (in terms of any possible family law reform proposals)? A legal contract at the onset of the relationship, prior to conception? I don't see any other way; any douche who don't care to use contraceptives can just use this kind of reasoning otherwise. Moreover, should there be a punitive clause for fathers who didn't make it clear that they don't want kids, did not …
/r/MensRights27/05/10 05:40 AM
3

I'm curious: why did you choose to call out erszebet_b, when it was IL128 who made the first personal attack in his original comment and you all but ignored it? Sorry, but you are either willfully ignorant or an insensitive ass.
/r/MensRights26/05/10 02:27 AM
11

Retarded conservatives who see sex everywhere.
/r/MensRights25/05/10 03:52 AM
5

Well, to be fair, in the pronoun game, it's always him. It's the default for godfreaking everything, good and bad and neutral. People only use her as a default when talking about nurses and such. Unless we're all gonna use him/her in absolutely everything...
/r/MensRights18/05/10 03:35 AM
7

Like I've said, that also applies reversely. There is also change in power wherein a guy can also lie about taking the pill and ends up knocking up a girl who doesn't want to be knocked up. If this goes to market, both situations can now happen, and it's a good thing to have this male pill so that both parties have responsibilities over contraception.
/r/MensRights17/05/10 06:23 AM
13

Am I the only one who finds it seriously disturbing that this submission (and the comments) is more concerned on what one female wrote (or didn't write, upon reading some comments) rather than what the MR community thinks about this development? Or did I misunderstand the purpose of this community, and that it is required to include some sort of female-bashing to my comments so I won't get downvoted? I think this is awesome, if it comes through. They should sell it in combo packages (well, maybe…
/r/MensRights17/05/10 06:10 AM
6

I see the same problem, but reversed. Right now: Male: You're on the pill, right? Female: Yeah, I am. (Ha ha fooled ya) With male pills: Female: You're on the pill, right? Male: Yeah I am. (Who cares I just wanna cum)
/r/MensRights17/05/10 03:27 AM
7

I dunno why this isn't the top-voted comment. I guess a lot of people only read the headline. I've mostly forgotten my statistics, but I know that you cannot draw a conclusion from such wildly unequal samples, i.e. n women = 16 and n men = 484. Presumably, the null hypothesis is that "There is no correlation between being female and high salary." As with anything statistical, you do not accept the alternative hypothesis, you can only reject or not reject the null, until such time that a better s…
/r/MensRights14/05/10 02:30 AM
0

Well, your previous comments didn't imply anything of the sort, just that different people need different advice, which I would say applies to everyone, male of female. The problem is that women are fickle, and what works on one won't necessarily work on another. It goes both ways. A column written by women for other women wouldn't necessarily please all men. Fickle wouldn't be the correct word choice here. As I've said above, different people need different advice. A generalization doesn't real…
/r/MensRights07/05/10 09:42 AM
-1

Childish insult: Crazy lady So why did you reply to me again, instead of the original name-caller, who doesn't even have an argument, whereas I have articulated mine? And what's your argument?
/r/MensRights07/05/10 05:07 AM
0

So what are you actually saying, that a sex column written by men for other men would be homogenous and wouldn't please all men? You said that the problem is that "sex advice that men need is fairly mixed." Where's the problem in that? Even a defined cross-section of the population is still heterogenous when it comes to behavior. All the sex advice in women's magazines will also do nothing to a girl whose boyfriend only gets hard whenever she makes a sandwich for him. I don't see a problem with …
/r/MensRights07/05/10 05:06 AM
-1

LOL, it says a lot that you replied to me rather than to the original "crazy lady" name-calling comment. What, pray tell, name did I call the OP in that?
/r/MensRights07/05/10 04:49 AM
2

Have you ever checked out /r/AskReddit and /r/sex? Also Dan Savage? It seems like there are a lot of men who could benefit from sex advice, but magazines targeting men already assume that We All Know What To Do During Sex And Don't Need Advice. Also, sex advice is sex advice, there's a little something for everyone. Do you think that men don't need sex advice at all? Because I, a male, would be pleased to see sex advice in mainstream men's magazines where men could ask and discuss sex stuff beca…
/r/MensRights06/05/10 08:40 AM
7

Actually, it's a valid question, if you can just get your head out of your ass and actually read the article. Here's a quote, kind of a TL;DR: I am pretty sure that there are some men out there who need some sex advice, too.....just saying.... Where's the sex advice in men's magazines? Men's magazines like Maxim have all sorts of naked women, but where's the sex advice? Dan Savage FTW.
/r/MensRights05/05/10 02:10 AM
6

Where exactly is the feminism in this? Reading the article, I get the picture of two anti-feminist women who beat up a guy.
/r/MensRights28/04/10 12:31 AM
1

Sorry, I was just illustrating a hypothetical situation, based on your parent comment.
/r/MensRights26/04/10 04:04 PM
1

Huh? Which part of my comment were you replying to? I was implying that you, as a male (presumably), is more of a feminist by refusing to be chivalrous, than the female who feels that she's entitled to your service just because you're male. For many females, that would be quite the insult.
/r/MensRights26/04/10 06:38 AM
1

then a pro-chivalry female may get mad at him. So? I've experienced this a few times. Just mock them and make it clear that you, as male, is more of a feminist than the female who felt that she is entitled of your service. Something like, "Ok because you're so weak you can't do it yourself." Personally, I'd rather that someone who wants chivalrous gestures get mad at me, rather than someone who doesn't want/need it. The latter actually has a point at least, the former only wants to reinforce tir…
/r/MensRights26/04/10 06:18 AM
2

Well and good, but I hope us men would help more to kill it.
/r/MensRights19/04/10 04:43 AM
1

Whenever I see chivalry in practice, e.g. guy pulling chair for girl etc., I don't know who to pity more. I'm embarrassed when I'm in the company of a guy who goes to great lengths just to be chivalrous. What the fuck dude?!
/r/MensRights19/04/10 03:10 AM
1

Are we still reacting to the link posted in the Men's Rights subreddit? We can move the discussion to /r/business and talk about what should be done so that tennis clubs can earn more money. Or we can recognize that prize money and salary are different animals. And that the link posted is not in any way about Men's Rights at all, but just someone who hates women. Because useless people like this are the reason why MRAs are not being taken seriously.
/r/MensRights08/04/10 08:06 AM
1

You're not thinking from a business perspective, because that's what sporting events are. Why spend more money unnecessarily? The douchebaggery comes from the organizers, who charge more for tickets to the male draw (because of more demand and therefore more revenues), and who insist on more sets (for longer matches and more advertising). But we are talking about PRIZE MONEY, and not salary, the writer clearly does not understand the difference between the two, and is only interested in thrashin…
/r/MensRights08/04/10 04:41 AM
3

WTF. Actually, there are five sets in male grand slam tennis because it makes for great TV, and great TV moments. Male tennis players have more fans than females, in the same vein that male basketball, among other sports, have more fans than female basketball. More sets, more advertising, more money. Whoever wrote this is a good-for-nothing asshole.
/r/MensRights08/04/10 02:48 AM
7

It's an outdated notion anyway. There are women who expect chivalrous gestures from males. They may spout grrrlpower stuff, but they are not feminists, in the academic and theoretical sense, in the same way that taxation is not in any way communist because your money could go to someone else. I would say that they're more anti-feminist, because they perpetuate the females-are-in-a-pedestal-chauvinism they were indoctrinated into. tl;dr: Not all women are feminists; not all chauvinists are men.
/r/MensRights07/04/10 09:20 AM
2

On a tangential vein, this occurred to me: What if one of the parties, particularly the female, withdraws consent in the middle of the act? I just read a scary court decision wherein the jury decided that it's not rape - implying that once you have said yes, you are effectively surrendering control of your own body to your partner until he climaxes, whether you want to or not.
/r/MensRights07/04/10 09:11 AM
-1

That was not my definition. That is the religious definition. Open any holy book and it's there, sometimes not explicitly, but it's there. Surely you can't deny that naive belief in imaginary sky fairies have dominated societies throughout history, right? And these stupid religious beliefs have massively contributed to these equally stupid "traditional public roles?" You are defining the traditionally feminine sex role as inferior to the male one. Therefore women either have to compete with men …
/r/MensRights02/04/10 07:02 AM
-2

Er... you're treating feminism as if there's no evolution to the movement at all. The first wave feminists were suffragettes and were still conditioned by society to be stay at home moms and nurture their kids and let men do the moneymaking and the manly task of protecting the country etc. If you claim that not being slaughtered for stupid geopolitics as a privilege for women, then you're basically saying that having a military is stupid because it enables young men to be slaughtered for stupid …
/r/MensRights01/04/10 05:20 AM
1

Feminism in the west started with suffrage - the blanket discrimination forbidding women a citizen's right to vote, and therefore take part in societal matters, on the basis of their genitals. Men have never been subjected to such universal injustice. That flows from there: women were regarded as second class human beings by a society that does not let them vote, have educations and jobs at par with men, etc. For example, when were women allowed to enlist in the military in western countries? Me…
/r/MensRights31/03/10 09:34 AM
-2

Because the philosophy of women as second-class human beings (cannot vote, should stay at home, should not partake in "men's issues," can be sold or stoned to death in some societies) have existed for millenia. This is an almost blanket oppression that half the world endured. On the other hand, most MR issues are applicable only to industrialized countries, where individuals enjoy more rights. For example, a female in a morel liberal country enjoys more freedom than in a conservative country - e…
/r/MensRights31/03/10 07:37 AM
-9

He should try getting raped sometime. Let’s get this straight: any woman who heads to an EI party as an anonymous onlooker, drinks five cups of the jungle juice, and walks back to a boy’s room with him is indicating that she wants sex, OK? To cry “date rape” after you sober up the next morning and regret the incident is the equivalent of pulling a gun to someone’s head and then later claiming that you didn’t ever actually intend to pull the trigger. He's not gonna say this if some dude partied w…
/r/MensRights30/03/10 03:11 AM
1

Who the fuck is "they?" Just because some magazine or TV show celebrates a fat woman doesn't mean it's celebrated in general. Does that same magazine or TV show ridicule a similarly fat male? Too much fat on anyone is gross. If you're fat, go celebrate your obesity.
/r/MensRights25/03/10 02:22 AM
-4

WOMEN ARE BITCHES!
/r/MensRights19/03/10 10:22 AM
1

If I were an employer, I'd avoid hiring females because of the liability and added expense of having female employees due to these "feminist victories". Actually, you should also avoid anybody who is in a minority and had been totally shit on all throughout history and have now only started to catch up. Black people? No. Gay people? No. They might sue you for... something. FYI, suffrage is a "feminist victory." NOW THAT IS SCARY
/r/MensRights15/03/10 09:31 AM
1

Good. Because this is disgusting failures such as those in the cases of the rapists John Worboys and Kirk Reid in London. Both investigations involved men who were allowed to carry out attacks long after they should have been detected. This needs to be addressed research into the truth about the number of women who make false allegations of rape. This is even more disgusting She says the media and public must stop blaming rape victims who are taken advantage of when they are drunk. And this is s…
/r/MensRights15/03/10 09:03 AM
1

file false pay discrimination claims after happily cashing "discriminating" checks for weeks, months, years or decades Just how idiotic is that? Have you even read the legislation? Apparently, it's okay for you to pay women less than a man for the exact same job. And it doesn't matter if she didn't know she was being paid less for weeks, months, years or decades. With your logic, rape should be decriminalized because some women might file false rape claims.
/r/MensRights15/03/10 08:42 AM
6

I get that, but posts like this generally tend to degenerate into women-are-bitches WHAARGARBL in the comments, so I thought I'd get that out of the way first. :)
/r/MensRights15/03/10 05:29 AM
12

Goes for both sexes. Rudeness is a human flaw, not a female flaw. Get a divorce?
/r/MensRights15/03/10 05:19 AM
3

I wouldn't say that feminism has failed. Context is crucial. Say the suffragette movement. Women have only been able to vote for what, a hundred years? Out of thousands of years of history? Other issues are even more recent. Hell, the US only passed the Lily Ledbetter Act last year. It is not fair to say that a few decades of feminism has failed after thousands of years of male domination. Equality is not magic. There are fringe elements though, much as there are fringe elements in every movemen…
/r/MensRights15/03/10 02:47 AM
3

Wrong subreddit. /r/WTF perhaps?
/r/MensRights12/03/10 08:17 AM
9

Hooray!
/r/MensRights01/03/10 05:16 AM
4

Seconded. I'm a guy and I see women at the gym being hounded by guys all the time. And I don't really care for women talking about shoes while working out.
/r/MensRights01/03/10 01:45 AM
1

How about drive-by shootings and gang-related crime? That alone is overwhelmingly committed by males.
/r/MensRights26/02/10 04:05 PM
-4

Yes. Try a little social experiment. Dress up in the most expensive and flashy stuff you can get your hands on and go to random seedy places every night. Your muggers will be overwhelmingly male.
/r/MensRights26/02/10 08:02 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter