TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

rhose32 Archive

View 1 post and 35 comments by rhose32 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
12

rhose32/r/ExRedPill04/03/17 12:05 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

Do you volunteer anywhere? At a homeless shelter, in a big brother/big sister program, or with disaster preparedness network for example? One thing I've noticed about alt-right types is that they believe they have no obligation to care about other people period (vs conservatives who just believe it shouldn't be enforced the government), so volunteering won't appeal to them. Volunteering also doesn't appeal to frat boys since they tend to just want to party. Also, I'm a liberal woman who's dated …
/r/ExRedPill30/11/17 05:21 PM
5

And that's supposed to be "self evident"? Like I said, haven't seen that anywhere, which matters because you're entire premise rests on the idea that anyone would agree with you if they just looked around. Also not sure where you're getting the percentages from. You basically just restarted what AF/BB is, then insisted again it's "self evident", then made up some numbers to "prove" your point.
/r/ExRedPill17/11/17 03:33 PM
8

The women I know had "types" (nerdy academic guys, frat guys, military guys, artists), and who their type was depended on the womens' preferences, interests, and lifestyle. They ended up married to guys who fit their type, and the circumstances. For example, a woman in the neighborhood association is finishing grad school in May and getting married to her college BF in June. He's a middle school English teacher with a tall skinny build. Her previous boyfriend was in high school, also a book worm…
/r/ExRedPill17/11/17 01:45 PM
6

I know what TPR is. I know what af bb is as well. The "WTF" refered to "TPR being right" and "af bb being a real thing" Taking issue with "Toxic masculinity" (or a form masculinity based on hurting other people) is not the same as having an issue with masculinity in general.
/r/ExRedPill17/11/17 02:43 AM
4

If you're changing your life to be more in line with what they would want, if you're not expressing you're self authentically based on their assumed judgement, if you're letting them prevent you from enjoying a relationship with your BF and making you question your sexuality, you're letting them win. Fuck that. They can't actually do anything to you or prevent you from living your life unless you let them, so why give them that power? Repeat after me: fuck. those. assholes. FUCK. THOSE. ASSHOLES…
/r/ExRedPill17/11/17 02:22 AM
5

Masculinity is not in women's best interests? TPR is right? Women are dating AF BB strategy? WTF are you talking about?
/r/ExRedPill17/11/17 02:13 AM
1

This blog post had some useful debunks http://slatestarcodex.com/2014/08/20/ozys-anti-heartiste-faq/
/r/ExRedPill17/11/17 02:08 AM
1

If he comes back: Instead of lying to and cheating on people you're dating, can't you just . . . chill? Make some friends and hang out with/text them from time to time instead of your gf? Work out? Channel your artistic energy into a Deviant Art gallery? Volunteer somewhere? There's literally thousands of things that would keep you from over investing emotionally in a girl in the early stages of dating that don't involve mistreating your dates. If you define "abundance mentality" as "being able …
/r/ExRedPill18/10/17 10:41 PM
2

How would that have worked?
/r/ExRedPill18/10/17 10:14 PM
3

If someone wants to get into an LTR and you promise to go exclusive with the full intention of dumping them latter, you are lying to them and wasting their time. If you tell someone that you're exclusive but sleep with other people behind their back, you're lying and cheating. If the reason you're lying and cheating and wasting people's time is because you're comfortable using them and don't care how they perceive you then fine, you might be able to get away with it for a while (especially if th…
/r/ExRedPill18/10/17 10:06 PM
2

So lying? Wasting people's time? Thinking "a girl your really like" is going to like being cheated on and lied to more than whatever you consider "neediness" to be?
/r/ExRedPill18/10/17 09:53 PM
5

What "product" are you finding at redpill that you can't find at those other forums?
/r/ExRedPill24/05/17 09:07 AM
6

Why can't you buy your "groceries" from /r/fitness, /r/selfimprovement, etc, instead?
/r/ExRedPill24/05/17 02:56 AM
1

Dump him
/r/ExRedPill30/03/17 03:47 AM
2

I accused you of making an unsubstantiated claim (that the 25% of homeless people being women was much lower then in the statistic), and that that claim was based on assumptions about women (that women consider "homelessness" to be "not having the latest items out of designer catalogues"), again for which you provide no evidence. So that puts the burden of proof on you, not me.
/r/MensRights23/03/17 09:22 PM
1

Back yours up, you pathetic coward.
/r/MensRights23/03/17 04:49 PM
1

And that was a blatant lie
/r/MensRights22/03/17 09:30 PM
2

What I said was you have no basis to doubt the 25% statistic other then sexist assumptions.
/r/MensRights21/03/17 11:47 AM
8

You're not. You literally said that with no evidence whatsoever that women who claim to be homeless are lying or their claims of homelessness can be dismissed because to women "homeless means something along the lines of not having exactly every luxury interior design you saw in a magazine". Quoting your exact words and pointing out that you have no basis to make your claim is not "gynocentric bias".
/r/MensRights20/03/17 11:36 PM
7

An article specifically discussing homeless women?
/r/MensRights20/03/17 10:19 PM
2

Did you read /u/Kyoopy2's comment?
/r/MensRights20/03/17 10:17 PM
25

It's not "pointing out discrimination". It's claiming that women aren't really homeless because to women "homeless means something along the lines of not having exactly every luxury interior design you saw in a magazine", a claim for which you provide absolutely no evidence while making sexist generalizations about an entire gender.
/r/MensRights20/03/17 10:16 PM
46

Just out of curiosity, are the "men's shelters" just called "shelters"? That was the case in my city for a long time. The "shelters" only allowed men and women and kids would go to the "women's shelter". They changed it in the past decade so that the women's shelter became the "family shelter" (for parents and kids), and the "shelter" allowed both men and women.
/r/MensRights20/03/17 10:07 PM
3

Yup. They're running for office now. Hence the women's march.
/r/ExRedPill04/03/17 01:40 AM
4

It seems like the OP was objecting to traditionalism. He mentioned part of the appeal of redpill was saying no to the high school -> college -> job -> marriage -> kids -> death path where marriage is between one man and one woman and the man is the provider of money and nobody has sex before marriage. Unless you mean something different by traditionalism that I'm not understanding. Also, what degeneracy of western society are you referring to?
/r/ExRedPill02/02/17 03:02 AM
60

Trump is the Redpill president. His attitudes, language, transactional view of human relationships, belief that strength = violence, need for control, and ability to disregard the humanity of other people in to achieve his goals are Redpill to the core. So was the #RepealThe19th campaign his supporters started. Redpill may not have main stream media presence, but I believe most people have encountered it online at some point or another. Women (and men) recognized the similarities between Trump a…
/r/ExRedPill22/01/17 07:43 PM
2

Exactly that is one of the flaws. That doesn't mean that the issue doesn't exist though. Also, feminism did not create those issues, and prior to feminism there was NO discussion on the subject, no investigation into how society shaped people's views on gender, it was simply assumed to be the "natural order of things" even if that order was damaging.
/r/ExRedPill21/01/17 04:25 AM
2

It is very thoughtful of you to thank the men on this sub. There are many men who have negative views about women, and it's nice to see men who don't have those views. So I would like to thank these guys as well. However, claiming "this was just my interpretation" is a flimsy defensive because not all interpretations are equally grounded in fact. Objectification as I defined it above which is based on the wikipedia definition https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Objectification (note: this has nothing …
/r/ExRedPill20/01/17 04:28 PM
4

It's a place to discuss the redpill, which you can't really discuss without discussing feminism. Also, there is no explicit ban on discussing feminism on this sub. Objectification is the idea that the social value of a woman related exclusively to her sexual appeal to men (something redpillers believe), and also the trend in advertising/media of portraying attractive women as props and in some cases literally objects (tables, rugs, mannequins, etc). What about that is dehumanizing to men? And fr…
/r/ExRedPill20/01/17 03:05 PM
3

How does feminism dehumanize the opposite sex?
/r/ExRedPill20/01/17 01:47 PM
1

Everything you have criticized him for not saying are things he has said on the blog. For example, he has frequently claimed that women want to "fuck hot guys", that women like sex, and that women are not necessarily monogamous. I didn't see a narrative of eternal victemhood at all, on the contrary he claims that women can be assholes who are just as bad as men and it's important for men to recognize that behaviour and be prepared to challenge women on it, leave the relationship, and even get le…
/r/ExRedPill07/01/17 07:54 PM
1

You still haven't answered my question: what advice would you give men instead? What is the alternative is there to accepting an 80% failure rate on online dating with stoicism? Forcing women to respond to messages they don't want to? Forcing women to approach men they don't want to? Having a man insult or harass a woman if she rejects him? His point is that even if you don't like accepting it, there is no alternative to accepting it that would make things better for the man or anyone else. Expl…
/r/ExRedPill07/01/17 06:30 PM
1

If the site doesn't work for you then fair enough. But seriously, what advice would you give instead? For example, you complained that he required men to accept an 80% failure rate. What alternative do you propose to accepting an 80% failure rate? You complained that he suggested that men make themselves more datable by dressing better and going to the gym. What alternative do you propose to dressing better and going to the gym that would make men more datable? Why is explaining why women might …
/r/ExRedPill07/01/17 03:47 PM
1

What advice would you give instead?
/r/ExRedPill07/01/17 02:49 PM
1

Check out Dr. Nerdlove. He is an Ex-PUA relationship coach distills the positive aspects of PUA (Working out, Style and presentation, social skills, confidence, etc) and leaves behind the sexist bs.
/r/ExRedPill03/01/17 05:23 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter