TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

rifinwono Archive

View 0 posts and 28 comments by rifinwono on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

it's a cultural phenomenon. men have historically been dominant and the sole decision makers. women are getting educated and taking up positions of leadership more these days. but the norm is still that it's men who are considered natural leaders. maybe it will change in the future, maybe it won't. i'm personally not very concerned about this. i am happy enough if opportunities available for women remain as similar as opportunities available to men. india is going in that direction, but it still…
/r/MensRights01/10/16 09:39 PM
0

perhaps, but it's true in india.
/r/MensRights01/10/16 09:02 PM
0

Mayhaps. Doesn't change the fact that it is male dominated though. Women are not given much importance in any kind of decision making.
/r/MensRights01/10/16 08:16 PM
1

It is a male dominated society. But the laws are biased against men. There's a distinction there
/r/MensRights01/10/16 07:00 PM
2

I mean the British Empire was kind of like an amputation for Indians. It was not a good thing, but it did get us out of our collective slumber. Also, the absolute majority of Indians don't give a fuck about Britain anymore. And there's not much of an inferiority complex here, because 1. The richer people who are more exposed to the west have a very good life 2. The poorer people are indifferent to the rest of the world. West or east. I think this lady is perhaps a product of her own country, ie.…
/r/MensRights21/08/16 04:35 PM
1

Actually, I feel most of the problems are relating to the laws. And these laws have been propped up because of feminism and the type of ideals/propaganda it spreads.
/r/MensRights15/08/16 12:34 AM
2

i am an overseas resident, but very much indian. modi has other things on his plate. even i would be disappointed with him if he bothered with this over more important stuff like military and economy. there are other ministers to deal with this stuff. and it's something that can happen with a similar probability as a traffic accident i imagine. around 10k false cases per year. they are actually planning to amend the law, so situation might become better in the near future. and if it happens, u'l…
/r/MensRights25/01/16 11:50 PM
1

Basically, society is still pretty male dominated and it is better to be a man than a woman. But rich women can and do lord it over poorer people irrespective of gender. Also the laws are really stupid and blindly support women. They are what you can expect from the trash politicians we have I suppose. The richer and savvier women basically exploit these laws in a rather straightforward manner to completely fuck up the lives of the average well meaning dude.
/r/MensRights25/01/16 01:34 AM
2

Plus, the rich women like the accused actually have it better than you can imagine. India is very very good to you if you are rich
/r/PussyPass01/01/16 05:46 PM
5

where do you idiots come from? what has raising men's issues gotta do with restricting women?
/r/MensRights19/11/15 03:42 AM
6

i don't think there was a long con. i think that's crediting them with too much smartness. they actually passionately believe everything they say.
/r/MensRights10/11/15 10:28 PM
1

you seem to be working with an assumption that there is no mental difference between men and women and that "strong and capable men" think the exact same way as "strong and capable women". now, in my experience, the women i consider strong and capable have qualities such as protectiveness, willingness to stand up to authority, sacrificing their own interests for the sake of their families, negotiating out of tricky situations etc.. "strong and capable men" would be those who are responsible, ana…
/r/MensRights05/11/15 09:25 PM
1

But aside from gender specific situations like that These are everywhere if you look for it. The way I see it, there are fundamental differences in mental and physical makeup of the average man and woman and this leads to a lot of differentiation which is present everywhere in society, but which you seem to be missing somehow. Safety for women is often emphasized because if there wasn't a good law and order situation, they will definitely be at risk of assault. So, there's a lot of these restric…
/r/MensRights05/11/15 07:49 PM
2

I'm trying to say I don't think that is true whatsoever. There's always going to be differences and particularly for gender. How can it possibly be dismissed as an irrelevant factor when it is so omnipresent?
/r/MensRights05/11/15 08:53 AM
2

I personally find the question: do you believe in equality of genders? to be a bit weird. What is equality in this case? Identicality or a lack of discrimination wherever the differences between the genders do not make it unjustifiable? I usually go by the latter definition loosely. But the term equality is vague and doesn't have much meaning
/r/MensRights05/11/15 03:28 AM
1

In India, that's around 15% of income per month for a lower middle class/above poverty line person
/r/MensRights31/10/15 01:53 AM
1

Dude it's done propaganda video. I hope you didn't expect critical thinking
/r/MensRights22/10/15 02:56 AM
10

I'm just gonna comment based on the title. As an Indian guy, I've seen a lot of comments about how India needs feminism because rape is in the news a lot. Actually, I've come to see feminism as just a bad idea and bad ideas produce bad results in whatever country they are applied. The problem with feminism is that it works the same as an identity or cult movement and only women can belong to it and men are treated as outsiders. So, this creates an echo chamber and removes the possibility of work…
/r/MensRights18/10/15 07:01 PM
1

Maybe you should explain what you mean. This is a post about a specific issue of how the laws are gender-biased in India and this is causing some people who find it unfair to protest. Why do you start talking about law and order problems, safeguarding life, liberty, governance etc.. Am I missing something?
/r/MensRights24/09/15 07:42 AM
1

Why is it that every post about India has to have some white knight telling us this is actually a good thing for us or that this shouldn't be a primary concern for us? There may be other pressing problems (like in other countries), but does that mean we gotta be ok with shitty laws which create problems instead of solving them? Or you think you got some exclusive right to complain?
/r/MensRights23/09/15 08:29 AM
22

You should consider bailing and leaving your country. And hope that your kid eventually understands your decision.
/r/MensRights23/09/15 06:39 AM
3

let the courts/police determine what is to be determined. we have no business dispensing mob justice anyway.
/r/MensRights29/08/15 11:25 PM
3

are you an idiot? the problem is exactly the same in india too. the gender related laws (which are set up by the feminists who actually work with a hive mind) uniformly affect men in all countries where such laws are applicable. you think just because india has a rape problem (it doesn't, but let's just go with the assumption), justice should be denied to innocent folks?
/r/MensRights29/08/15 10:05 PM
2

I agree with you personally. But I think everyone can make their own decisions. If you think about it, short of going out in the streets and protesting and struggling and being labeled as wusses and stuff, avoiding marriage is an easy and convenient form of protest
/r/MensRights23/08/15 03:49 PM
2

The problem is more with the laws than with human nature. People here feel helpless against the law more than anything else
/r/MensRights23/08/15 03:30 PM
2

actually, the society still massively favours men. but the laws favour women equally massively.
/r/MensRights25/07/15 08:35 PM
3

It's not as simple as you think. Rape is a regional phenomenon within India. And there's a huge range of people here, including a very large genteel class. The rapists that you read about don't give 2 shits about the law anyways. These laws are constantly used by rich women who know how to exploit them against innocent victims and the women who actually suffer violence don't get nearly as much help from the shitty governance system we have. Our idiotic politicians (and a clique of high class fem…
/r/MensRights17/07/15 06:56 PM
1

Splits would make sense if it were 50% (assuming one spouse did no work) up to a certain cap, say 1 million dollars or something. Because at the end of the day, the other person chose to focus on household work. And household work does have a price tag. And that price tag should be less than 1 million dollars no matter which way you see it.
/r/MensRights09/07/15 09:40 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter